Hello Sir, i would like to know whether a defensive player can block vision of offensive player in .. (the way battier defends kobe, or the way Lu Dort defends Lebron)??? Please answer this
I can confirm it's the same rule in FIBA. When appropriate, you'd give a warning, even if it means instructing the player to stop during live play. But by rule, it's a technical foul.
Just gonna jump in here to say that although you are technically correct, the pivot foot movement is so minimal and doesn't create any advantage, so that's a travel you would let go. The more important action is the out-of-control defender taking the shooter out. As a guideline, after any whistle, you need to be able to articulate the advantage or disadvantage that was caused. If you can't, you should have passed on it. On the theme of game management, if you call that travel, you are going to have a field day trying to manage the yellow teams coach, who is going to be rightfully furious! For reference: I would watch the Olympics Gold medal match between US and France. Curry shuffles his pivot foot slightly before many 3 pointers, but there's no whistle because it doesn't create an advantage.
@@ReffyRef You really can not justify not calling a travel based off what the NBA calls or doesn’t call. There are some many fouls and travels that do not get called it is ridiculous.
@@ReffyRef Being devil’s advocate here but based on what you said that the travel by yellow did not create an advantage, then if a players travels away from the basket does not create an advantage either but we are still taught to call it. J/S..
Hello Sir, i would like to know whether a defensive player can block vision of offensive player in .. (the way battier defends kobe, or the way Lu Dort defends Lebron)??? Please answer this
In NFHS, purposefully obstructing an opponents vision is a technical foul. Not sure about FIBA.
I can confirm it's the same rule in FIBA. When appropriate, you'd give a warning, even if it means instructing the player to stop during live play. But by rule, it's a technical foul.
@@ReffyRef ty
@@OfficialsInstitute My pleasure!
During the drive on the 1st video, before the foul the player in yellow actually traveled.
Thnx for watching
@@OfficialsInstitute I enjoy the videos as it prepares me as a new official and makes really understand my role in the game.
Just gonna jump in here to say that although you are technically correct, the pivot foot movement is so minimal and doesn't create any advantage, so that's a travel you would let go. The more important action is the out-of-control defender taking the shooter out. As a guideline, after any whistle, you need to be able to articulate the advantage or disadvantage that was caused. If you can't, you should have passed on it.
On the theme of game management, if you call that travel, you are going to have a field day trying to manage the yellow teams coach, who is going to be rightfully furious!
For reference: I would watch the Olympics Gold medal match between US and France. Curry shuffles his pivot foot slightly before many 3 pointers, but there's no whistle because it doesn't create an advantage.
@@ReffyRef You really can not justify not calling a travel based off what the NBA calls or doesn’t call. There are some many fouls and travels that do not get called it is ridiculous.
@@ReffyRef Being devil’s advocate here but based on what you said that the travel by yellow did not create an advantage, then if a players travels away from the basket does not create an advantage either but we are still taught to call it. J/S..