Does Stuart Broad believe in the Spirit of Cricket? 🏏 | Up Front
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 фев 2024
- Taken from: • “I was staring at them...
This is Up Front with Simon Jordan, a new podcast from William Hill which sees the broadcaster and former Premier League club owner test the biggest names in sport.
Simon will ask the questions most interviewers shy away from and hold his guests' opinions up to proper scrutiny. He will investigate how sporting challenge, achievement and experience have influenced athletes' lives whilst imparting his own forthright views on a range of sports and topics.
Expect some twists, robust debates and high-profile sportsmen and women being put under the spotlight in the company of Simon. How will they cope with a forensic examination of their views, career, successes and failures?
Subscribe for future episodes and head to @upfrontwithsimonjordan for full video episodes.
This is Up Front, brought to you by William Hill. 18+ please gamble responsibly.
#StuartBroad #SimonJordan #UpFront
I was at a few of those Tests. The abuse Broad got was beyond hysterical whipped up by Lehman and the press. Of course they showed their true spirit with sandpapergate not long after. Broad was a true warrior.
Been plenty of players that walked like Adam Gilchrist
You are a lightweight.
That’s one player not plenty
Hashim amla
He's got a point though with the "nahh thats a red im off" comparison. Simon wormed his way out saying footballs not claiming to be honest😂 Tell me one fully honest sport Simon? even snooker and Darts is packed full of stunts mate come on hahaha
Simon really cut through the nonsense in this one. The bottom line was reached.
I've learned something, and with a bit of luck, you will have too.
I loved watching Stuart Broad play
My issue is how he behaved and tuning the opposition about “spirit of cricket “ after the Bairstow run out and he was just THE WRONG guy in the situation when he knicked a ball not to a wicketkeeper but to A SLIP, was that in the spirit in 2013
It’s a load of
The spirit of cricket has gone because of the other countries who play the game. I played professional cricket both home and abroad in the 1980s and there was a spirit of cricket in England. You also had it to a point in South Africa and Australia. That said cricketers in both SA and Australia both played the game to the absolute limit which I prefer because you know exactly where you stand.
The spirit of cricket 🏏 that people talk about has gone. It’s a Victorian era view of cricket and that probably lasted until the early to mid 1960s.
Gilchrist from Australia
He is the only one!
Hashim amla
Gilchrist walked off in 2003 semi final of the World Cup when given not out, every cricketer knows this!!
Every stumping is called a stumping instead of a run out when you don't run!!
The umpires didn't move or call over, Bairstow moving his foot does not mean the overs over!!
England invented destroying the spirit of cricket way back in 1932-33 when they aimed the ball at players heads (no helmets then) to stop Bradman scoring runs, classy as always.
The question should be, 'who nicks one to 1st slip and walks?' Answer - everyone. Everyone except Stuart Broad.
2 issues here
England are the country that continuously go on about Spirit of cricket. Ask fans from any other nation and they will mention England as the noise makers.
Secondly, Stuart Broad didn't just knick the ball, it was a full blooded edge 😂
Edge? He bloody middled it!!
Once any sport goes professional,then spirit of game goes.cheat if you can get away with it 😅
No one is cheating. That’s the wrong phrase.
Remember England are the one's who go on about the Spirit of the game.... England are the same country that fought against other countries hosting a world cup in the early days untip India challenged them in court.
India should concentrate on providing sanitation for their people.
Broad is a 🔔 end IMO. Now don’t all overreact…. Breathe….it’s just my opinion. He was a great bowler but a 🛎️ end
yeah a deeply unpleasant piece of work, nice to see someone else who thinks it , horrible bastard he is.
His response to or defence of his Daily Mail article was unconvincing & Simon set this up cleverly. Comes across as a bit of a twit & shallow hyprocrite. As was his struggle to define what is "cricket" and what is "not cricket" in terms of sportsmanship.
Legend!
Play to win. Lad Broad.