I love the attention to detail with the set itself. Bobbys backgrond is all about him, even the mic cord is yellow, same with Andrew. Its so well designed.
I remeber seeing a podcast with these too long before this podcast was made. Must have been 2015-16 or maybe earlier. It was the most mean funny show ive ever seen. This is tame compared
Ooooohhh soooo good!!! The way Santino gets Bobby all worked up is so deliciously masterful. Don’t get me wrong, Bobby is a straight up bully to everyone that is around him so to have Bobby unknowingly go upside down in Santinos comedic bits is pure gold!! DAMN I LOVE BAD FRIENDS
This was so funny 😂 I’m a painter and grown Art School kid this was hilarious... love these guys, lmao! Who knew Elf and Creed are Bobby’s triggers 🔥🔥🔥
The way Monet painted light was abstract in its way. If you look at them closely they just look like a muddle of colours they only look like realism when looked as a whole. That’s amazing. Not everyone can do that
Reminds me how Picasso started realistic and was only able to draw "badly" after many decades, takes a lot of experience to break the rules in such an organized way
Nope. Modern art is just a rejection of beauty and aesthetics - a demoralising and subversive force which serves as an allegory for the decline of Western civilisation. We now place the ugly before the beautiful, the unhealthy above the healthy, and through propaganda, we have midwits like Bobby Lee pretending that Basquiat's art isn't simply hideous rubbish.
I know right? The very moment unreleased movies started slapping "Certified Fresh On Rotten Tomatoes!" on their trailers back in 2015(?) was the moment the site was evidently not a reliable source of criticism anymore.
Ironically the Renoir Impressionist painting that Santino calls “technical” was called "impressions" by the art critics at the time because they didn’t look like finished paintings done using traditional methods.
@@lukapajovic8209 yeah the post just seems to be implying that the term impressionist came from what critics were saying but I always understood the term to come from Impression, Sunrise by Monet which was the first piece of the movement
Asian artist period like not only painting? DAVID CHOE, JAMES JEAN, TWO-ONE, JIM LEE, DUSTIN NGUYEN etc. Dustin and Jim are my favorite comic/hero type artists!
@@shadcovert1160 i'm not really sure. I've devoted so much time watching the podcast that they feel like actual people I regularly hang out with (which probably sounds weird). it just keeps out the stress that normally comes with work.
I'm sure Hokusai art is somewhere in Bobby's house. And he has an Akira Kurosawa movie poster, he was a painter before becoming a director. He story boarded Kagemusha before making it. Dream too, I believe
Are you working there.... floored me laughing. You two are the best laugh ever. I think I've spit out my drink so many times listening to you both that I purposely now don't drink while watching you both. Thanks for great laughs always keeping it real. ❤
Greatest artist ever? Aurther Rackham. His work shaped the imagination of 3 generations of children worldwide. He illustrated all the greats from Alice in wonderland to grims fairytales.
I agree with Andrew! Lol, I love when Bobby’s like “yea, but when u see a basciatt (sp), u know it’s a basciatt.” And Andrew said “yea, cuz it’s uniquely bad”. EXACTLY what I was thinking when he said it. Lol.
Not only was he spot on with his view that you could find a Basquiat comparable painting on any parents fridge, I’ve got a wall full of better paintings by my kids.
Or the trump comment since Hawaii and east Palestine and ww3 and Afghanistan and inflation and crime and the border and the supply chain and fentanyl deaths and dementia and race relations and so on and so on and so on.
While 99% of Chapelle is great, the trans stuff seems a bit forced and not naturally as funny as pretty much all his other shit. He has a couple good thoughts about the commitment and conundrums being trans presents, but it just comes off as trying too hard on it or being too invested. It's actually kind of weird to me how he is hung up on it. Like observe shit and make fun of it and change peoples take. But those jokes didn't hit in the same way. Which is also crazy to me considering how well he can make you think about race, class and sexuality in different ways effortlessly. Anyway still love Chapelle, but his regular jokes and his trans jokes are two different styles, and it only strikes me as weird because everything else he touches is much more honest and genuine and thoughtful imo. His trans jokes are the only ones where it feels like he's punching down. Maybe because of the harsh reaction his first jokes in that arena got, but the double down just didn't feel like his usual style. That's it.
also it's black and white - reviews are either classified as bad or good. when in reality a movie that is, "95% fresh" could have a bunch of reviews that go, "yeah, this is slightly above average but nothing special" but the 95% number makes it look like a classic. you can use it but you've gotta take it with a huge grain of salt
MOST of the official critics are on the Left and will always have Left opinions. Not to mention censoring comments and fudging the numbers. The whole point of the site is to get a true sense of what people thought. As soon as it's clearly biased, the entire exercise breaks down.
Andrew/Bobby have the ultimate gaslighter/gaslightee relationship. Andrew: You'll never get an Emmy. Bobby: Yes I will. It's possible. Andrew: No, no Emmy for you. Bobby: I think I will. Andrew: Nope. Never in a hundred years. Bobby: Okay, maybe I won't get an Emmy, but I'll... Andrew: Don't say that, you'll get an Emmy one day.
Judging quality of technique in art (and other creative expressions) depends on what you're trying to accomplish and express, and to whom. Rick & Morty is technically badly drawn compared to a Rembrandt painting if judged on what Rembrandt is trying to accomplish (realism). But a Rembrandt painting is technically horrible for an animated satirical comedy show. When judging Basquiat's paintings, look at what he wants to convey, and to whom, and ask yourself if his style is effective in conveying this message to this group. It's not about realism, but expression. He's classified as a neo-expressionist after all. Judging from how well he's been received, I'd say it's hard to argue that his style and technique is more or less perfect for what he's trying to accomplish.
Bobby pretending he's so intellectual and has all this knowledge of art and film is the best. He's a fake elitist and it's just the best. Keep being you bobby lol.
Santino is right. You can't just look at what the critics think anymore. Movie reviews used to be way more objective, but so much of it is political now. RIP Roger Ebert.
Santino is 100% correct. Basquiat’s work was revolutionary - because quite honestly it was the first to incorporate graffiti and “hood” art (famous “crown”) into fine art, it did help because one of the top artists of his generation Warhol,endorsed his work. The work itself looks like it was done by a 5 year old. But to modern expressionist abstract art- all of it looks like junk anyway. None of these guys can hold a candle to the technical gifted genius of da Vinci, Michelangelo, Rafael, or Rembrandt, Vermeer and others.
As an artist and doctor get a real job Truthfully I must admit saving someone's life is no where near as satisfying as someone understanding and appreciating my art but anyone who says shit like art "changed lives" makes me wanna strangle them. That self importance shit is unproductive and exhausting with doctors but maddening with artists
@@keard558 everybody has their own perception about how they want to function in a society. satisfaction means a lot of different things to a lot of people. and an artist should understand this better.
Dude, I completely understand Santino's rage over shit like Bastiat, or Pollock.. "my niece!!!!" lofllll I couldn't agree more, and all my life I've been told how beautiful Matisse and Monet and Picasso were
I think Banksy is an EXCELLENT example of the art vs artist. You have the art they paint and can it stand up on its own… and it’s does in my opinion. And then you have the character that the artist is and whether they’re art is popular because of how good it is or the mystique, absurdity, and or pure snobbish hype (usually out of the hands of the artists who suffer this aspect). Like, Banksy’s art is good, but it’s not worth what people are willing to pay for it….. and Banksy agrees with that statement… Though I do like the length he went to to fuck over the rich art snobs who unknowingly bought his self shredding painting.
This is hilarious, though I kinda disagree with them both. I think the appreciation of certain types of modern art depend on how much value you place on the intention behind the painting. It relates to how much you think it matters that the roughness is intentional and many of the artists can paint well in terms of technical realism, as is usually the case (look at Jackson Pollock's early stuff), yet chose to paint in a style your "kid could paint." Do you buy into the idea that this context can imbue it with some deeper meaning and allow you to appreciate the subtler aesthetic value that you might otherwise dismiss or that simply wouldn't be there if your child actually did it. I'm not sure how much I buy into it myself, but I think you'd have to decide how much truth there is to it on and artist-by-artist basis, rather than dismissing all of this kind of stuff. If it's ugly or a gimmick, it might be art, but I wouldn't want it, nor do I understand the appeal beyond as a way to launder money. Some of it is likely a combination of market manipulation, laziness, and bullshit, but at the other end of the spectrum sometimes there is something deeper. To use the least controversial example possible: many, including the French Academy, originally thought impressionism was just sloppiness, that more obvious brushstrokes were simply mistakes, and that the subject-matter was trite nonsense, rather than it representing innovative techniques to more accurately represent light and its interplay with everyday subjects that would go on to revolutionize painting completely. People said at the time that new students wouldn't get away with such sloppiness, but they simply didn't understand what they were trying to do. I think there's a broad spectrum between genuine attempts to advance the medium and fraud, but to dismiss all modern art is ridiculous. I don't really know enough about Basquiat, though, to say where he falls on that line, but I think there's probably a vast number of artists on the chopping block before his work is judged. Also, rest assured, I'm aware these are jokes.
I was going to correct the "alive" part but then saw the comment was 6 months old. Still so sad though, I had only known about him for about a year before he died. So young.
I’m with Santino. I appreciate skill and technique when it comes to art, while also understanding everyone has a different opinion on things. Bobby thinks half of America is dumb and doesn’t deserve to have a voice, and whose opinions don’t matter. Audience score for Rotten Tomatoes all the way. Critics are manipulated by those they want to please and answer to.
More than half of *all people* are idiots and shouldn't have a voice; not everyone's meant to be heard. The advent of social media has ruined that fact, and we're collectively worse off for it.
@@dy120481That’s the fault of the intellectuals, not of the „idiots“. If you’re smart, then educate the less smarter instead of looking down on them. There is a reason why people like Trump have come this far.
Not a fan of abstract art. Not just because it's unique means it's good. If I put a turd on a stick, it's not a work of art just because it hasn't been done before.
That drawing of bobby is funny af. It should be on a shirt
Maybe the funniest thing I ever seen 💀 🤣 😂 😅
Lol
I drew it! It was my first attempt at a portrait. Haha was so excited when they put it on the podcast.
@@cannabisdeathmorbs 0p
@@fishseason101 lp90
That was hilarious. They both changed sides in between and defend each other’s point 😂😂😂
I love the attention to detail with the set itself. Bobbys backgrond is all about him, even the mic cord is yellow, same with Andrew. Its so well designed.
Hehehehehehe yellow
Wow well spotted I hadn't noticed!
I was about to be like 👀 until I saw andrews was orange lmao maybe you’re on to something
cos joe rogan was on his case about his set looking bad lol
I watched the entire video and didn't realize they had different backgrounds.
I love how angry this podcast is. The pacing is intense. Deep breath...
I remeber seeing a podcast with these too long before this podcast was made. Must have been 2015-16 or maybe earlier. It was the most mean funny show ive ever seen. This is tame compared
F the masses, F the corporate
Bobby literally has a James Jean mural on the wall of his house and didn't name him as an Asian artist
Lol he choked on the spot
I really like JJ art. But i cant understand why people say its basic
@@shayZero James Jean is a very talented artist
Ooooohhh soooo good!!! The way Santino gets Bobby all worked up is so deliciously masterful. Don’t get me wrong, Bobby is a straight up bully to everyone that is around him so to have Bobby unknowingly go upside down in Santinos comedic bits is pure gold!! DAMN I LOVE BAD FRIENDS
Santino as he shakes his finger “elf is better” chanting it harder each time lmfao
This was so funny 😂 I’m a painter and grown Art School kid this was hilarious... love these guys, lmao! Who knew Elf and Creed are Bobby’s triggers 🔥🔥🔥
Love that you guys are doing clips :) Not only can i rewatch the best parts.. it's easy to share :)
Keep er up :)
Bobby-" I'm not elitist"
Also Bobby-" the masses duuuhhh"
😂😂😂I love these guys
The way Monet painted light was abstract in its way. If you look at them closely they just look like a muddle of colours they only look like realism when looked as a whole. That’s amazing. Not everyone can do that
Reminds me how Picasso started realistic and was only able to draw "badly" after many decades, takes a lot of experience to break the rules in such an organized way
@@nodruj8681 your mom literally just asked me last night tho
@@nodruj8681 I did
So he got lazy?
@@mafinalmessagechangedaworl7131 drugs
Nope. Modern art is just a rejection of beauty and aesthetics - a demoralising and subversive force which serves as an allegory for the decline of Western civilisation. We now place the ugly before the beautiful, the unhealthy above the healthy, and through propaganda, we have midwits like Bobby Lee pretending that Basquiat's art isn't simply hideous rubbish.
"My niece! My niece!" Santino entering courtroom drama mode.
Bobby not thinking critics are bought and paid for is actually hilarious
I know right? The very moment unreleased movies started slapping "Certified Fresh On Rotten Tomatoes!" on their trailers back in 2015(?) was the moment the site was evidently not a reliable source of criticism anymore.
My like was accidental but I will allow it, MrBeans. Proceed.
@@Duciousness as is this one..... continue
Yeah and it's already proven that you can pay critics in rotten tomato
They are not, they are very ethical people
Ironically the Renoir Impressionist painting that Santino calls “technical” was called "impressions" by the art critics at the time because they didn’t look like finished paintings done using traditional methods.
where did you hear that about the art critics?
@@simongunther8414critics looked negatively at impressionists, favists, cubists
@@lukapajovic8209 yeah the post just seems to be implying that the term impressionist came from what critics were saying but I always understood the term to come from Impression, Sunrise by Monet which was the first piece of the movement
Asian artist period like not only painting? DAVID CHOE, JAMES JEAN, TWO-ONE, JIM LEE, DUSTIN NGUYEN etc. Dustin and Jim are my favorite comic/hero type artists!
I swear to God I love this podcast so much I at least make sure that I listen to the new episode 4x a week before another new one comes out.
Well that's bizarre. That's what little kids do, they will literally watch the same exact movie 3 times in a row with no complaints.
@@shadcovert1160 lol right
@@shadcovert1160 i'm not really sure. I've devoted so much time watching the podcast that they feel like actual people I regularly hang out with (which probably sounds weird). it just keeps out the stress that normally comes with work.
@@mingthemerciless834 That’s fucking disturbing dude, listen to Tigerbelly and whiskey Ginger along with bad friends.
samen only 8x a week for me 🤣
That drawing of Bobby is timelessly disrespectful af!!!!! Wich makes it perfect! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Andrew looks like Van Gogh's self portrait
I'm sure Hokusai art is somewhere in Bobby's house. And he has an Akira Kurosawa movie poster, he was a painter before becoming a director. He story boarded Kagemusha before making it. Dream too, I believe
Asia has a way richer art history than 'the west' fact. White washing and recency bias says otherwise.
@@felix-bk7ne Longer history but Western artists (and composers) clearly pushed art to new heights.
Bobby for sure knows Takashi Murakami, Hokkusai, and Yoshitomo Nara but it can be hard to pull names on the fly.
Andrews deep “NOOOOO!” When Bobby said his uncle Hahn could paint a Renoir 😂😂😂😂
Bobby actually has Luke Chueh hanging in his house and can’t come up with a second Asian painter!!
James Jean too
it's wild how popular the great wave off kanagawa has gotten while nobody knows who katsushika hokusai is
@@ennuiii or yayoi kusama stuff
I forgot I clicked on this video because of the Bobby drawing. But man “MY NIECE!!! MY NIECE!!! MY NIECE!!!” was hilarious
Are you working there.... floored me laughing. You two are the best laugh ever. I think I've spit out my drink so many times listening to you both that I purposely now don't drink while watching you both. Thanks for great laughs always keeping it real. ❤
MYYYY NIECE MYYYYY NIECE
Santino definitely said "Bournain" the first time 😆
the rotten tomato critics gave chappelle's special a 0. so yeah critics don't know everything, they're bought and paid
Comedy is subjective tho. Drama not so much
“Elf is better” 😂😂😂
That picture is hilarious
I drew it. Haha it was my first attempt at a portrait drawing.
They’re outbursts at each other gets me every time 😂
I loved "Fishing With John", that was a great one, especially the Dennis Hopper and Willem Dafoe episodes.😁
I tell you what there is nothing better just popping this podcast up after a stressful ass day
5:47 😄😂🤣🤦♂️ I busted out laughing.....did Bobby dirty!
2:16 Donaldo?! I think he means Donatello, alongside Michelangelo, Raphael and Leonardo 😅
Greatest artist ever? Aurther Rackham. His work shaped the imagination of 3 generations of children worldwide. He illustrated all the greats from Alice in wonderland to grims fairytales.
That Bobby drawing had me crying! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
"You KNOW it's not better! You KNOW it's not better!!" lmao
I can't unhear bobby ending sentences with "yea,yea,yea" a ridiculous amount of times every podcast lol
From Elf being the best to critics not knowing diddly squat...Santino just gets it
but I think he was very wrong about basquiat.
Props for editing, I noticed the little things backing up the conversation more please, appreciate it.
I agree with Andrew! Lol, I love when Bobby’s like “yea, but when u see a basciatt (sp), u know it’s a basciatt.” And Andrew said “yea, cuz it’s uniquely bad”. EXACTLY what I was thinking when he said it. Lol.
Oh please!
Hahahahahahaha, "he was my AA sponsor"
The drawing 😂☠️ I need a print to hang up next to a portrait of Kramer.
Comparing Basquiat to Cho is like comparing Basquiat to Cho
That drawing of bobby made me laugh hysterically
Not only was he spot on with his view that you could find a Basquiat comparable painting on any parents fridge, I’ve got a wall full of better paintings by my kids.
Huge opportunity missed to name the TMNTs among the artists
To be fair that artwork looks exactly like Bobby
I drew it! Lol thanks!
"Bourdain's his name"....the way Bobby says this just kills me🤣🤣🤣
Not a fan of Creeds music but their guitarist is really god damn good.
hell yeah man. Mark Tremonti is killer! his playing in Alter Bridge is really good. the intro to "Broken Wings" 💣
Bobby ~ "name 240 painters. ready go."
Rotten tomatoes argument didn’t age well since the Chappell special.
Or the trump comment since Hawaii and east Palestine and ww3 and Afghanistan and inflation and crime and the border and the supply chain and fentanyl deaths and dementia and race relations and so on and so on and so on.
Honestly every art and art history classroom has had this conversation followed by a portrait of bobby
Very late but props to Bobby for the Ok Computer shout.
Can't trust rotten tomatoes. Gave Dave Chapelle a 0 because it was controversial
While 99% of Chapelle is great, the trans stuff seems a bit forced and not naturally as funny as pretty much all his other shit. He has a couple good thoughts about the commitment and conundrums being trans presents, but it just comes off as trying too hard on it or being too invested. It's actually kind of weird to me how he is hung up on it. Like observe shit and make fun of it and change peoples take. But those jokes didn't hit in the same way. Which is also crazy to me considering how well he can make you think about race, class and sexuality in different ways effortlessly.
Anyway still love Chapelle, but his regular jokes and his trans jokes are two different styles, and it only strikes me as weird because everything else he touches is much more honest and genuine and thoughtful imo. His trans jokes are the only ones where it feels like he's punching down. Maybe because of the harsh reaction his first jokes in that arena got, but the double down just didn't feel like his usual style. That's it.
also it's black and white - reviews are either classified as bad or good. when in reality a movie that is, "95% fresh" could have a bunch of reviews that go, "yeah, this is slightly above average but nothing special" but the 95% number makes it look like a classic. you can use it but you've gotta take it with a huge grain of salt
MOST of the official critics are on the Left and will always have Left opinions. Not to mention censoring comments and fudging the numbers. The whole point of the site is to get a true sense of what people thought. As soon as it's clearly biased, the entire exercise breaks down.
5:48 I swear I was laughing for a good 15 mins just howling ☠️☠️☠️☠️😂😂🤣🤣🤣
I like to think Andrew was actualy talking about Alf the whole time
My niece may be the greatest quote ever
OMFG when they put the smiley face up after the bobby drawing 😂
Andrew/Bobby have the ultimate gaslighter/gaslightee relationship.
Andrew: You'll never get an Emmy.
Bobby: Yes I will. It's possible.
Andrew: No, no Emmy for you.
Bobby: I think I will.
Andrew: Nope. Never in a hundred years.
Bobby: Okay, maybe I won't get an Emmy, but I'll...
Andrew: Don't say that, you'll get an Emmy one day.
Nah, Bobby’s got a point on this. Popularity and quality rarely are one in the same.
I can see Bobby as italian yeayeayea
Judging quality of technique in art (and other creative expressions) depends on what you're trying to accomplish and express, and to whom. Rick & Morty is technically badly drawn compared to a Rembrandt painting if judged on what Rembrandt is trying to accomplish (realism). But a Rembrandt painting is technically horrible for an animated satirical comedy show.
When judging Basquiat's paintings, look at what he wants to convey, and to whom, and ask yourself if his style is effective in conveying this message to this group. It's not about realism, but expression. He's classified as a neo-expressionist after all. Judging from how well he's been received, I'd say it's hard to argue that his style and technique is more or less perfect for what he's trying to accomplish.
As an art historian I’m biting my tongue 😂
Andrew did cross some lines with that back hand to the mic, good on bobby to call it out 😂
I would only be friends with Bobby just to piss him off as much as possible 😂
Best description of Basquiat. Santino's on point.
These two are hilarious together. Bobby getting angry cracks me up and Andrew always says the funniest sh- which only keeps Bobby wound up.
Bobby pretending he's so intellectual and has all this knowledge of art and film is the best. He's a fake elitist and it's just the best. Keep being you bobby lol.
Bobby is an elitist lol.
Did he hurt you?
I think you might be taking this a little too serious, wouldn't a fake elitist imply he's pretending.
Lol and youre a real elitist in youtube comments of a podcast
Lmao so true
Bobby and santino throwing up rakes 😂
I apologize but the musicians of creed are some of the most technically proficient instrumentalists walking today, Scott stapp dragged em down
Dude the thumbnail is gold😂😂😂😂😂. Please out it on a trucker hat and beanie
Santino is right. You can't just look at what the critics think anymore. Movie reviews used to be way more objective, but so much of it is political now. RIP Roger Ebert.
Santino is 100% correct. Basquiat’s work was revolutionary - because quite honestly it was the first to incorporate graffiti and “hood” art (famous “crown”) into fine art, it did help because one of the top artists of his generation Warhol,endorsed his work. The work itself looks like it was done by a 5 year old. But to modern expressionist abstract art- all of it looks like junk anyway. None of these guys can hold a candle to the technical gifted genius of da Vinci, Michelangelo, Rafael, or Rembrandt, Vermeer and others.
OK computer is a master piece! Damn bobby is on fire
"Bullsht, Bullsht..., Derivative - Ongo Gablogian the Art Collector."
Elf 👏🏽is 👏🏽better👏🏽
As an artist, this conversation feels like a thousand knives piercing through my one ear to the other.
As an artist and doctor get a real job
Truthfully I must admit saving someone's life is no where near as satisfying as someone understanding and appreciating my art but anyone who says shit like art "changed lives" makes me wanna strangle them. That self importance shit is unproductive and exhausting with doctors but maddening with artists
@@keard558 everybody has their own perception about how they want to function in a society. satisfaction means a lot of different things to a lot of people. and an artist should understand this better.
Dude, I completely understand Santino's rage over shit like Bastiat, or Pollock.. "my niece!!!!" lofllll I couldn't agree more, and all my life I've been told how beautiful Matisse and Monet and Picasso were
This is where my knowledge of the ninja turtles comes into play
I think Banksy is an EXCELLENT example of the art vs artist.
You have the art they paint and can it stand up on its own… and it’s does in my opinion.
And then you have the character that the artist is and whether they’re art is popular because of how good it is or the mystique, absurdity, and or pure snobbish hype (usually out of the hands of the artists who suffer this aspect).
Like, Banksy’s art is good, but it’s not worth what people are willing to pay for it….. and Banksy agrees with that statement…
Though I do like the length he went to to fuck over the rich art snobs who unknowingly bought his self shredding painting.
Haha all the musicians in Creed would smoke the black keys in regards to technicality Andrew was talking about
This is hilarious, though I kinda disagree with them both. I think the appreciation of certain types of modern art depend on how much value you place on the intention behind the painting. It relates to how much you think it matters that the roughness is intentional and many of the artists can paint well in terms of technical realism, as is usually the case (look at Jackson Pollock's early stuff), yet chose to paint in a style your "kid could paint." Do you buy into the idea that this context can imbue it with some deeper meaning and allow you to appreciate the subtler aesthetic value that you might otherwise dismiss or that simply wouldn't be there if your child actually did it. I'm not sure how much I buy into it myself, but I think you'd have to decide how much truth there is to it on and artist-by-artist basis, rather than dismissing all of this kind of stuff. If it's ugly or a gimmick, it might be art, but I wouldn't want it, nor do I understand the appeal beyond as a way to launder money. Some of it is likely a combination of market manipulation, laziness, and bullshit, but at the other end of the spectrum sometimes there is something deeper. To use the least controversial example possible: many, including the French Academy, originally thought impressionism was just sloppiness, that more obvious brushstrokes were simply mistakes, and that the subject-matter was trite nonsense, rather than it representing innovative techniques to more accurately represent light and its interplay with everyday subjects that would go on to revolutionize painting completely. People said at the time that new students wouldn't get away with such sloppiness, but they simply didn't understand what they were trying to do. I think there's a broad spectrum between genuine attempts to advance the medium and fraud, but to dismiss all modern art is ridiculous. I don't really know enough about Basquiat, though, to say where he falls on that line, but I think there's probably a vast number of artists on the chopping block before his work is judged.
Also, rest assured, I'm aware these are jokes.
Game idea, "is it a child's painting or is it a baskiot"
This painting of Mr.Lee looks like a hedgehog with d. Syndrome become human 😂
“Stop it” 😂😂
Kim Jung Gi is amazing. Damn you Bobby. You should know this guy. One of the best living artists alive and his comic art is pretty good too
I was going to correct the "alive" part but then saw the comment was 6 months old. Still so sad though, I had only known about him for about a year before he died. So young.
didnt he have photographic memory too? His art is insanely good
I love how Bobby is the Bert
(standing applause to Santino for his Basquiat views) more people need to be less afraid of calling him out as a mediocre artist.
God I love you guys, If I had a podcast with my friends this would be it.
I promise that if I someone who doesn't even know the basics to acting ever go to the emmy's I will invite Bobby Lee as my guest.
Bobby Lee trusts the opinions of fart huffers.
Just name teenage mutant turles
he almost named Donatello but said "Donaldo" haha But also: Donatello wasnt a painter
Can we say he was an Afro Latino Artist and recognize who he really was.
I’m with Santino. I appreciate skill and technique when it comes to art, while also understanding everyone has a different opinion on things. Bobby thinks half of America is dumb and doesn’t deserve to have a voice, and whose opinions don’t matter. Audience score for Rotten Tomatoes all the way. Critics are manipulated by those they want to please and answer to.
More than half of *all people* are idiots and shouldn't have a voice; not everyone's meant to be heard. The advent of social media has ruined that fact, and we're collectively worse off for it.
@@dy120481That’s the fault of the intellectuals, not of the „idiots“. If you’re smart, then educate the less smarter instead of looking down on them. There is a reason why people like Trump have come this far.
John Lurie was in 'Down by Law Stranger than Paradise' by Director Jim Jarmusch.. now that's art!🤔
Santino's remarks on Basquiat are spot on.
Not a fan of abstract art. Not just because it's unique means it's good. If I put a turd on a stick, it's not a work of art just because it hasn't been done before.
The Rotten Tomatoes "critics" give "Cuties" high ratings .
Triggered Bobby is the best and optimal Bobby i fucking love how far you've come since "BOBBY SUCK! BOBBY SUCK!" on MadTV
andrew really pissing me off with the basquiat
Dude im so glad people thought the same thing
fully agree lol - Bobby was completely right here
Naw, that shit looks like actual trash
Basquiat was phenomenal
Id like to see anyone paint a masterpiece close to basquiats untitled (skull). Id like to see andrew paint anything