The Paladin is more well rounded, plus it has some problem with Composite armor upgrade- receiges only 20, not 25 percent armor. And of course, let's not forget the strategy plans, they give huge boost.
That is because Paladin is NOT a replacement for Crusader. In my days of playing, I always considered Paladin to be more of a counter-tank to GLA's Scorpion, which, when upgraded properly, can take down battlemaster, even in groups.The Scorpion rocket upgrade is the tipping point for this match up, but Paladin take's that advantage away, thanks to it's laser.
paladin is meant to fight mixed units and base defenses, so while he shoots at vehicles and buildings, lasers will protect from whatever rockets come at them. Same-cost Paladins would win vs same-cost Battlemasters if they were tested vs mixed armies
Its kinda crazy that in CnC games, Allies/USA has weak tanks when in reality, they have a really strong tanks that they are still in use just minor adjustments to armors and stuff even as an old model.
And he needs to make the matches only four versus four so that the Battlemasters don't get their horde bonus. If they do get to The horde bonus, then it's only fair that the paladin tank gets the buffs from the strategy center.
After Zero Hour introduced Avengers, Paladins lost what made them unique. I would given the Paladin a machine gun to be able to deal with infantry or something.
Sure the Paladin tank can have a drone and has a laser that can shoot down incoming projectiles but it costs a promotion point and I'd rather spend that on the a10 strike or the fuel air bomb
Some USA and GLA ground units cannot fight China's mass ground units due to Horde Effects bonus if they are 5+ units of them. Soften them or decrease their numbers with artillery, air support and splash damage weaponry. Use Guerilla Warfare and Hit & Run Tactics against a large but slow moving army.
The Paladin isn't good in competitive, where it's good is in compstomps when your facing usa or gla. Why? Paladins are good in being a wall between your squishy units like, tomahawks, avengers, or even soms humvees (when the enemy has equel or more range then em). In china slug matches crusaders do fine but in gla or usa slug matches the paladins anti rocket laser is great to diminish dmg from stinger sites or rocket buggies. Patriots or other usa missile units. Yes they won't shoot all rockets down but, they make up for that in armor. Support a group of paladings with anti air or arty and they will do fine in compstomps.
please prepare for us a new video which is about dragon tank VS toxin tractor or paladin VSmaruder or red guards VS rangers maybe rebels or emperor VS scorpion i liked this videos please keeep it up
@@aldrichbalnazzar8214 yes, but you need 5 battlemasters to activate horde bonus, paladins with upgrades like ''search and destroy" and "advanced training" feels more sure on the battlefield
Go SCUD launcher vs deployed NUKE cannon all in range (without any of the units moving) but at least 100 vs 100 cause the destruction will be beyond imagining
The paladin is not using one of his best weapons which is the missile interceptor laser! And the battlemasters are made for raw battle in the open field, their number bonuses give them a big advantage.... are they up to date against chain blast? ANOTHER ADVANTAGE!!! In short.... I love the Chinese faction... but this is an unfair battle.... it's like sending the Navy Seal into the open field, melee without their tactical weapons, facing a gigantic group of barbarians, where his battle element is the OPEN FIELD GRRRR
У танкового баттлмастера с двойной лычкой и перезарядкой с апом на урановые снаряды, будет бонус преимущества в толпе против 5 Паладинов. По сути Паладин самый слабый танк в игре, Крестоносец на его фоне выглядит лучше.
Why are your numbers always so wonky? 800 * 60 = 48,000 1100 * 43 = 47,300 That is not nearly the same cost?? There's a 700$ difference. That's almost a full Battlemaster. Why couldn't you just do 55 Battlemasters and 40 Paladins? 800 * 55 = 44,000 1100 * 40 = 44,000 This is the same cost without any difference whatsoever. All your videos are completely wrong about the cost and it's incredibly confusing why that is so when it's so easy to get the same cost without always having such massive differences.
Your description fails to take into consideration The horde bonus that the Battle Master tanks get when they are in groups of five or more.
In mixed unit composition, Battlemasters would also have propaganda bonus from Overlords.
i remember battlemaster and gattling tank rushing my dad, he found a counter to it eventually but not before pissing him off countless times
No wonder why people use rocket humvees instead of tanks in competitive games.
USA Faction tanks are garbage.
rocket humvee is essentially a rocket buggy, but can target air units as well
also no USA generals have tanks(except for laser)
Because of better micro , humvee is much faster than a tank and have much better turn rate.
tanks are just too slow to do anything, while rockvees are so versatile, fast and deal more damage to all targets
This is why rocketvees were removed in the ROTR mod
The Paladin is more well rounded, plus it has some problem with Composite armor upgrade- receiges only 20, not 25 percent armor. And of course, let's not forget the strategy plans, they give huge boost.
@@topkitena , according to "Strike Team".
One of the best reason why I always choose China during multiplayer coop is the Horde bonus.
Atleast 10 BMs per wave causes panic. Ah good old days
until you meet USA player with rocket humvee and his micro harassment BS in competitive
Horde bonus. That's why i love Battle master tanks
Would like to see not enough BMs to have the Horde Bonus vs Paladins.
Ahh your Profile
sparkle/hanabi ❤
When I saw Palidan tank lose to a soloing marauder, that's when I realize they are not worth the General Points.
Yeah, it's kind of a shame that their only use is really successfully assaulting Patriots.
They're good as general purpose unit. But as you mentioned, they don't have anything special when it comes to firepower.
Perhaps not as strict anti-armor, but the laser is a good soft counter to scorpion rockets and stinger sites.
That is because Paladin is NOT a replacement for Crusader. In my days of playing, I always considered Paladin to be more of a counter-tank to GLA's Scorpion, which, when upgraded properly, can take down battlemaster, even in groups.The Scorpion rocket upgrade is the tipping point for this match up, but Paladin take's that advantage away, thanks to it's laser.
@@MajorHickEpaladins can also shoot down scuds from scud launchers
i see a paladin as a defensive units, they're good on disabling rockets. as for battlemaster is really good with that china buffs.
paladin is meant to fight mixed units and base defenses, so while he shoots at vehicles and buildings, lasers will protect from whatever rockets come at them.
Same-cost Paladins would win vs same-cost Battlemasters if they were tested vs mixed armies
Look folks 1v1 Paladin wins, in stuff these where the horde bonus is in effect Battle Master always wins
Nope, 1v1 against a Marauder, the Paladin loses, and the Marauder gets a salvage upgrade.
@@Marinealver now now stick to the topic, were talking about battlemasters vs Paladins
@@Marinealver Then the Overlord shows up and literally crushes the Marauder.
Its kinda crazy that in CnC games, Allies/USA has weak tanks when in reality, they have a really strong tanks that they are still in use just minor adjustments to armors and stuff even as an old model.
because balance, USA is strong in airpower, while china is strong in ground
The idiotic balance.
This really didn't age well lol. Allied and USA tanks in Ukraine proved they burn just as good as any other.
You can also include temporary upgrades provided by the strategy center.
And he needs to make the matches only four versus four so that the Battlemasters don't get their horde bonus.
If they do get to The horde bonus, then it's only fair that the paladin tank gets the buffs from the strategy center.
That horde bonus really does wonders in tank battles. This is why I love to have attack choppers around as a counter.
After Zero Hour introduced Avengers, Paladins lost what made them unique. I would given the Paladin a machine gun to be able to deal with infantry or something.
paladin should have laser plus machine gun to make it able to counter infantry considering that it cost a whole god damn general point to use.
they already have a laser point that attacks enemy infantry
@@whatrulookinatm8 You're right, I forgot...
Congrats on getting to 500+ subscriber keep it up your videos are amazing
Battlemaster Tank: Rate of fire is the key to any victory!
Sure the Paladin tank can have a drone and has a laser that can shoot down incoming projectiles but it costs a promotion point and I'd rather spend that on the a10 strike or the fuel air bomb
u should make a video on world builder how u make these videos and explain all the steps about it specially om armies and the civilian buildings
I'd like to see some infantry vs battles
Some USA and GLA ground units cannot fight China's mass ground units due to Horde Effects bonus if they are 5+ units of them. Soften them or decrease their numbers with artillery, air support and splash damage weaponry. Use Guerilla Warfare and Hit & Run Tactics against a large but slow moving army.
The Paladin isn't good in competitive, where it's good is in compstomps when your facing usa or gla.
Why?
Paladins are good in being a wall between your squishy units like, tomahawks, avengers, or even soms humvees (when the enemy has equel or more range then em).
In china slug matches crusaders do fine but in gla or usa slug matches the paladins anti rocket laser is great to diminish dmg from stinger sites or rocket buggies.
Patriots or other usa missile units.
Yes they won't shoot all rockets down but, they make up for that in armor.
Support a group of paladings with anti air or arty and they will do fine in compstomps.
Make it day lol i can barely see anything
How do you make unit fight each other like this. Would you mind if you share this map with its scripts?
please prepare for us a new video which is about dragon tank VS toxin tractor or paladin VSmaruder or red guards VS rangers maybe rebels or emperor VS scorpion i liked this videos please keeep it up
Paladins are more universal tanks, battlemasters don't have so many advantages like paladins
Yeah but horde bonus doesn't care
Absolutely, they can defend themselves from air missiles and rockets and against ground rockets and missiles.
@@aldrichbalnazzar8214 yes, but you need 5 battlemasters to activate horde bonus, paladins with upgrades like ''search and destroy" and "advanced training" feels more sure on the battlefield
@@adnanadil4498 Also paladin's laser can kill infantry at a close range, sometimes it's a big advantage
except being better per cost.
Subscribed yo
Go SCUD launcher vs deployed NUKE cannon all in range (without any of the units moving) but at least 100 vs 100 cause the destruction will be beyond imagining
The paladin is not using one of his best weapons which is the missile interceptor laser!
And the battlemasters are made for raw battle in the open field, their number bonuses give them a big advantage.... are they up to date against chain blast? ANOTHER ADVANTAGE!!!
In short.... I love the Chinese faction... but this is an unfair battle.... it's like sending the Navy Seal into the open field, melee without their tactical weapons, facing a gigantic group of barbarians, where his battle element is the OPEN FIELD GRRRR
Make it four versus four so that the Battlemasters lose their horde bonus.
Nope. It's a not same cost
Nationalism will bring us victory!!
nice video keep it up
Paladin strength is against missile plus US drone, China BM tanks has horde effect.
Now I wonder about Rocket Buggies vs Paladins.
У танкового баттлмастера с двойной лычкой и перезарядкой с апом на урановые снаряды, будет бонус преимущества в толпе против 5 Паладинов. По сути Паладин самый слабый танк в игре, Крестоносец на его фоне выглядит лучше.
battelmaster have way more units than paladin ....why not the same unit number ?!
Same cost, stupid
Based on cost.
Now do Rise of the Reds battles.
looks like he used 3 pc to make vid ?
well add 50% china tanks 50% usa tanks cuz this doesnt prove nothing that china tanks are better cuz they are more numbered
Paladins are nighmare to gla players.just 3 of them with ambulance and just can do tons of harm gla army even when u skillful gla playa.
1v1
Why are your numbers always so wonky?
800 * 60 = 48,000
1100 * 43 = 47,300
That is not nearly the same cost?? There's a 700$ difference. That's almost a full Battlemaster.
Why couldn't you just do 55 Battlemasters and 40 Paladins?
800 * 55 = 44,000
1100 * 40 = 44,000
This is the same cost without any difference whatsoever.
All your videos are completely wrong about the cost and it's incredibly confusing why that is so when it's so easy to get the same cost without always having such massive differences.
USA 💙Is better. it is cheaper and tactical
their tanks are garbage though
@@Marinealverpowerful yet expensive