Access EO's premium & unreleased content in EO Builders, a community of thriving founders & future builders worldwide 👉bit.ly/42DVV9L ✅Meet the founders featured on EO through Builders Webinars ✅Join Cohort-based learning programs from top-tier VCs and thoght leaders ✅Be a part of the global network of driven entrepreneurs
I'm 61 and using AI, it's a game changer for learning, it's like having your own personal tutor who doesn't get pissed off with a barage of endless questions about new or unknown terms or definitions. Wish this was around 40 years ago.
@@Ezra-wy7ux Same argument that was presented in the 70s and 80s. Robots are going to take all our jobs but what actually happened was an upshift to new skill sets and technologies. After all this time the Luddites are still about. Bet your kind of thinking doesn't extend to the technologies that bring you water, energy, your car, mobile phone and every other comfort that you enjoy 🙄
absolutely. his systematic explanation with his style gave me some vision that I'd like to keep in mind as well as passion to learn more for the coming new era.
Design Thinking will be integrated to everything. How to create a restaurant menu to how to design behaviours of your kids. Future will be interesting. Fellow UX designer.
I agree with him 💯. Our kids need to learn how to interact with the existing technology and at a time when they are most creative. This guy is brilliant. We need more educators thinking this way
I agree with *you* 100%. (: IMO, It’s terrible that students are even prohibited from using technology that they will need as basic skills when they become adults. Dunno if anyone here is older than I am (: but I remember the days when calculators were banned in school. Kids learning AI today will be making decisions on what AI technology to use in their companies.
How much time until AI gets creative?, imagine you base the education of an entire generation on the creative process and in the moment they get to the working life AI replace them too...our brain has nothing magical, creativity can be AI simulated too, probably in a couple of years you will be able to adjust the level of metaphorical references in the AI essay that is directly related to you browse history so you can catch all the "winks"...the moment has not yet arrive but we have to face that in the future we would be physically and intellectually expendable.
I have never met a particularly creative child. I’m sure they exist (but even Mozart’s early compositions are vastly inferior to his mature output). Children churn out lots of garbled nonsense, because their brains are undeveloped, but that isn’t creativity. And a lot of their "active imagination", upon examination, is usually the product of media they are consuming (produced by creative, adult artists). This is just as sentimental and ill-founded as the romantic "all children are naturally curious, until the system beats it out of them" meme. Some children are curious, yes; some adults are curious, too. In my experience most adults and most children are shockingly incurious. Teachers’ jobs would be much easier if most children were naturally curious about science! If children ask more questions, it is simply because they are more ignorant about the most basic and useful things. Maybe I’m wrong here. But probably this perspective just rarely gets expressed? (I am fully anticipating a telling off for being a curmudgeon).
This video was so packed with valuable information, no empty words no fillers. In just less than 10 minutes he got to explain the basis of design thinking with examples. But not just that it was about how to teach children, how the education has to be, how to cope with the change. Dr. Li Jiand is a man I will need to follow.
Oh gosh, the little people shuffling around rearranging their lives so AI Big Tech can make hand over fist billions as millions and millions will be devastated by the disruption that the little people are just supposed to accept as a given. It drives me nuts, this narrative of what humans must now do to accommodate the future determined by a relative handful of AI movers and shakers.
@@rosstulloch8100 I think the only strategy he suggested is "embrace it." I feel a bit on edge, thinking that this whole thing could have been generated in Blender by a 14 year old.
I watched it two times and took notes! Dr. Li Jiang, thank you for sharing and I hope these ideas are applied by teachers and students of all ages everywhere, specially children. 👏🏼👍🏼
Empathy isn’t enough. Narcissists are highly empathetic, but then use their understanding of the emotional dynamic of a situation to manipulate others. AI needs, like people, to have understanding and prioritization of avoiding harm.
I worked with manufacturing efficiency for many years and have since retired. Just one of management's methods for solving problems was the DMAIC method. Define the problem, Measure the problem, Analyse the results, Implement the control method, and Control through measurement. And we taught this method to all of our employees.
I think that’s the part that’s worrying for me because creativity has always been my strongest trait. This is the first time AI started encroaching in that space, and it’s no longer feeling as irreplaceable.
And someone who profits from this crap telling us how wonderful it is while promising strategies and giving none is an additional cause for worry. I wish governments would shut this crap down so that society can keep up. This is too much change too suddenly. I don't want to read something written by AI no matter how good it is. I know why Han treated C3PO like shit.
@@roadrash2005 creating art via ai to me is rather dull and unpleasant process. Like clicking a button in a factory. No thank you. It poses no challenge and provides me no joy or feeling of being proud. Most undesired paintbrush someone could give me.
@@haganame1240 Van Gogh would probably say the same thing about digital art. Yet that’s what you have to use in the modern world. Either learn how to utilize the tech beyond clicking a button or get left behind.
@@haganame1240 What's the point of art? Look nice? NO Art is made to influence, give vision, tell us something, move the way we think, bring emotions, represent a pattern from reality. A thing made by artist isn't ART. Art is what can function as art.
I have taught creative thinking in the artistic perspective since i was 23. Its the most important type pf learning a person can receive besides critical thinking. It should literally be taught from kindergarten to university consistently.
How is this bringing more peace, joy and love to humanity? Those are the most important. Sometimes people lose the plot and just create tech without thinking of the big picture.
Incredible video. One could say that instead of giving the student a problem to solve. Asking them to think about a "problem" that can be solve will certainly spark some creativity and outside of the box thinking. Although Chat-gpt also can do it, for some topics involving emotions or feelings will be out of the equation.
chat gpt has a politically correct US west coast liberal bias. it does not answer the truth to any question that might challenge that. therefore it's ineffective at tackling deeply human topics for 99% of the human population
As a Computer Science student, our department allows use to use ChatGPT for schoolwork. But they boldly highlight the ethical usage of AI, and being able to use AI as a stepping stool and not a "spoon feeding" tool. In my opinion, I think that as someone who is not studying computer science or anything related to CS or IT, being able to understand how the AI works, and also knowing the concepts learned in this video will greatly help you survive in the era of AI. Major shoutout to my college department for promoting these tools instead of being a karen about it.
I think one great solution for ai era is to do things personally instead of written homework at home for example. Then teachers can really analyze how their students are evolving the teachings, also stimulate more personal interaction than use ai as a secondary tool to help instead of do the work all by itself
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 He deserves a round of applause. I heard that the best learning institutions were teaching their students how to use ChatGTP. This technology is an incredible tool.
Funny, what is there to learn? It's a chatbot, ask, and see what comes out. Write something like: Imagine your are an AI professor at Standford university. Give me 10 reasons, why AI will destroy lots of jobs in 1000 words. 🤣
I know it's incredible.... It's taking me ahead and teaching me things before my tutors are teaching me, giving me an Opportunity to look smart from being a worse student.
@@Theguywithspectacles That is one of the first things I thought of! If schools realised the potential of ChatGPT they would ensure every student had it in class, where it could act as a personal tutor at every student's desk, with the teacher guiding the whole process. It would accelerate student's learning!
I've been thinking about creativity and education for so long. This really validates my whole thought process. We gotta teach people to work with the future that's being created. And how to stay human through it all
Nah that's silly. Saying that neglects the various different human societies and cultures. I would say Ai threatens the status quo of the current capitalist system
@@Dianetics.Junior Machine intelligence will vastly exceed all forms of human intelligence. It won't be close. Why would machines care about "different human societies"?
@@GuaranteedEtern ya sure, but being human isn't exclusively about intelligence. And we don't live in enough of a monoculture that every human quality will be outdone by AI. It's possible that we are barreling towards a dystopian quality of life imbalance, but it's more likely that our societal values will shift. Being human is never irrelevant. Being a whale isn't irrelevant. Extrinsic value will just change.
Dr. Jiang just taught me something new but was all there all along. "All design is redesign" omg Thank you so much for sharing this video I learned a lot and im not even in the tech industry. Its so simple i can put all of his pointers into action as soon as I can
I worked as an ex-data scientist at a sizable corporation. Im watching this after automating an entire team, replacing them. But they left a junior and fired the entire team and me(im not in the team) last week. I understand the logistics behind it: they think they can train the junior to monitor, let let go of me cause i get 3x more pay. If things were good and expanding they woulda kept me but as they get into survival mode they simply want the least cost. While i think that’s the dumbest decision, non-tech executives dont know that and dont care. I honestly thought i would be the one to survive if i am the one optimizing and automating things. Im honestly lost as where to go cause things wont be too different in different companies as even top tech companies are laying people off at a massive scale, and i think it has more than just the economy to account for.
This means we have to evolve to adapt on this rapid change that technological advancement is affording us. Let us discover, try and secure opportunities to thrive in this ever changing world.
This is definitely useful for kids and there future and for people who are disabled, me being shot from my neck down really has took a toll on me asking people to help me, or even being took advantage of being in the wheelchair by over charging someone in my condition more than it cost for assistance or digital aspects of marketing books, music or scripts, i definitely appreciate it alot
I am really happy that i found this video and absolutely proved that i'm not the crazy person that i think in the way that the Stanford AIRE Director explains some very important key points for the future of learning . Absolutely big congrats on the way of thinking 👐 Based on my experience in the past , i was kind of a person that always was looking to cheat the system , like a back door in the school , then in university was the same . I would say there are 2 ways of teaching ! The one (oldest conservative version ) : key words - mandatory , must be , if not read .... - students get penalized due to not following the conservative frame of the school or the teacher . This type of learning for me was the most boring and always as usual took the poorest scores ,as simply this way is cutting the way of 'implanting the seeds' for interest in learning to the students. The second one ( new free version ) : key words - empathy , positivism , embrace creativity , exploring , allows the technology .... - this is the path that a lot of teachers and lecturers need to understand the constant improvement in the way of how the information needs to be provided and share their knowledge is the crucial for their personal success and the future success to the students . The key point here is if they teach for the basic salary , or for the final outcome of their students . Back in the time I had to do Essay on topic - Will the mouse eat the book ? Well , now i would like to ask my teacher - The result of Singularity + Sentient = ? I would like to believe that is = Creativity If this does not help, maybe the answer is hiding somewhere between "onward - backward" , "logic - not logic" thinking , but definitely between 0 and 1 :)
I hate to say this but as students, you (I mean you students collectively, not you personally) don't really have an appreciation yet for how necessary that mandatory knowledge is. You're still learning, you haven't actually had years of experience at work and encountering all kinds of problems related to work. You may think that piece of knowledge is useless, a waste of time. You want to cut corner. But that's gonna make your knowledge full of holes like Swiss cheese, and it'll bite you back later when you actually need it. Teachers and the education system know what you'll most likely need, because they've spent years figuring that out. That's why they make you study them. I myself was once like you (we all are). I've spent my uni years studying classes that were so boring and "a waste of time". But now when I've gone through years of PhD study and become a uni lecturer myself, I'm actually grateful for those classes. In my lab and in my classes, I've seen many other students struggle with problems that to me is like "why haven't you learned this in 1st year?" because they've had a different curriculum than me.
@@kasalibang7206 Of course in a utopia world, it would be best if each person was educated according to what they'd need. But it's not logistically feasible. Even you yourself won't know for certain what kind of job you'll end up doing in 5-10 years time, and what kind of knowledge you'd need accordingly. So the education system is set up to teach everyone the knowledge that you'll statistically most likely need in the future. Furthermore, schools and unis don't just have obligations to the students. One of their functions and duties is to grade and evaluate the students, so that employers (and society in general) can base on that to assign the jobs most fitted to individuals. That's why we have exams, GPAs, degrees, and why teachers require you to have certain knowledge to pass the classes/curriculums.
He touched upon a very important contemporary topic after rapid technological development happening around us regarding reshape of education delivery systems in the era of AI
I think Dr. Li is totally on the right track. I wholeheartedly agree with his 0 to 1 vision. I think that is a KEY IDEA that needs to be implemented in the current educational system ASAP. Overall, a very refreshing exposure of a critical topic for the future of education and for the future of humanity.
I hope education follows your thinking! I strongly believe AI can be an Ally if leveraged well, and indeed I believe we need to teach people how to use it. I'm also encouraging my kids to use it and learn how to use it better to their advantage. ❤
@Anvandarnamn i do think we have to see it a tool that we can use. Like a powerful technology it can have lots of applications, some will be bad some will be good. It's a new revolution. Like the industrial revolutions, the steam power, internet,... Imagine if we vetted steam power... Or fire 🔥... We'd still live in dark caves.
@@yeahboi7562 when the war started in Ukraine, we got offline because the Russians destroyed our electricity infastructure. I did not have any work for 3 months, got a huge bank credit to buy powerbanks, and now cannot even fix my teeth (and I lost almost 10 teeth after they occupied my town and held us there in cold winter without food). I am also unable to work in any other fields because all my life I have been focused on jobs connected with computers, mainly teaching English online, and they stopped working when the Russians shut down the Internet. The whole country survived thanks to foreign humanitarian aid of food and clothes, and fuel. We were so poor. I remember what happened to people's calculation skills when they got calculators. I still remember this because in my country school pupils started using calculators when I was in the 4th year of school. After a couple years nobody was able to do simple calculations, and we had to carry that calculator in our pocket, physically. Now we are moving into the age when almost all thinking skills are going to be performed by bots. And the climate is changing, and the political situation is getting worse and worse with more militarization. I cannot imagine what the people of the future are goin to eat when some Chinorussia destroys their power stations and Internet lines. Those Starlinks will also be shot down by anti-satellites. I am thinking about how to safeguard my survival in those scenarios, and I wonder what you would suggest (and don't propose solar batteries, they will be useless when you have to migrate to another location).
It's nice to see that schools are also forward thinking and prevent jobs being lost to technology. I'm on Bluewillow and been teaching myself some prompt engineering just in case.
you dont need to learn course to get better at prompt engineering lol. just experiment with chatgpt for 1-2 days on stuff you actually know about, there are free chatgpt APIs all over black hat forums
7:58 Instead of three days you have two hours to do the homework but students still have to proofread and edit, fine-tune instructions, basically make it their own. Early education will be even more fundamental in the area of ChatGPT.
You are creating a future of kids who are going to be mentally and creatively atrophied at the service of their robot masters. That is a fact. These ai people know technology, know science, but they are not smart enough to see what they are creating.
Democratizing art via AI is exactly as described: non-creative people who can now fake being creative because the machine made them look really good. Congratulations. Your contribution to Art was a creative prompt.
Dr. Jiang, some questions for you: I can see the usefulness of AI for finding cures for diseases and helping business owners write copy. However, I think AI does more harm than good in the arts. Having taken art from artists without their consent in order to train AI, such as ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, AI allows users to create work “in the style of” a specific artist or to input an artist’s name and output work that seems as though it was created by that artist. This directly uses that artist’s talent against them and diminishes their ability to make a living from their art. How is this empathetic? And why can’t AI companies simply remove this function, which, essentially, steals an artist’s originality and can lead to forgeries, copyright infringement, identity theft, and deepfakes? Even if an artist does not upload their work, others may do this, and so as long as we allow “in the style of” prompts and other prompts that allow users to input artists’ names, we are effectively pushing out people who are creative and replacing them with people who are less creative. How is that better for society? I also do not understand why we are expected to readily embrace this technology when it’s clear that those behind it haven’t thought through its impacts on society. It’s nice that you want to figure out how to make AI work with education, but shouldn’t that have been a forethought rather than an afterthought? How many students will become overly reliant on AI before solutions are offered and widely disseminated? If we have even one generation of undereducated professionals in the medical and scientific fields, shouldn’t that be cause for real concern? And why weren’t teachers trained in how to spot work created by AI before this technology was released?
I dont think you understand ai very well.... you don't choose ai, like you don't chose a kid, you teach him once the structure is operational (when it's born) there is a lot of things you cant think of. AI isn't hurting arts, it is democratizing it. Everyone will be able to do anything. Problem is humanity does not have enough wisdom as a whole, people have no goals, no meaning in their life, they are on cruise control. Ai will sweep everyone and the majority is not ready mentally. It is happening whether we want it or not. There is no huge router somewhere that we can simply unplug/plug to restart. Ai is stealing artist? What's the difference between learning an artist and. Trying to reproduce it ? Design is redesigning. The only thing that change is the time it takes
@@Digit0wL I think the problem is that the tech community doesn't want to acknowledge that the process by which humans learn to create art is very different from that of AI and that copyright law was written for humans, not AI. Most professional artists attend schools or take online courses because, unlike AI, we cannot learn how to create excellent art by simply looking at copyrighted images on a screen or listening to copyrighted music. Usually, the process must be explained to you by someone else who also had it explained to them by someone else. You have to learn technique, theory, and (in most cases) technology. And in that learning process, every art teacher I have ever had has stressed the importance of developing one’s own unique style/voice as a condition for employment and survival. Standing apart from other artists-originality-is literally the bread and butter of every successful artist. Prompt engineers would like to “skip to the good part” by using the free labor of artists and stealing originality and voice under the guise of style. Note that Vice recently reported that much of the “art” that generative AI spits out is copyrighted and in over a third of cases, an exact copy of existing, copyrighted work. (See "AI Spits Out Exact Copies of Training Images, Real People, Logos, Researchers Find" by Chloe Xiang.) This could mostly be solved very easily by not allowing users to input names of specific artists and not including work by living artists unless you have secured their consent.
@@Digit0wL Also, as a Black artist with a disability, it is infuriating to see tech corporations attempt to spin this as “democratizing” and an “equity” issue and go so far as to tout the use of their tech by some marginalized people as evidence that it is somehow progressive. There are BIPOC artists with disabilities whose work has likely been ripped off to feed these machines and to enable others to further rip off such artists. Also, as most know, artists are generally not privileged people. Many of us, even those who are not BIPOC and/or living with disabilities, struggle for decades to succeed in our crafts and make major sacrifices for the sake of our art. Few of us make the kind of money that the tech bros who are benefiting from this theft make. (This is particularly true for BIPOC artists who have disabilities and likely lack connections and, when disabilities are severe, employment opportunities.) A mantra of progressive movements should be: If your group’s path to success depends on the oppression of another already oppressed group, then it’s not a progressive path. It’s a divide-and-conquer strategy being used by the usual oppressors and you are merely a pawn in their colonial agenda.
@Sonar @Sonar I can't care less about bipoc and racial stuff, why the hell someone that is not bipoc is less relevant? Stop whining like a little B and try to look where you are. Why do you have to say that you are black artist?? What does it change? I am suppose to pitty you and obligated to like your art??? Wtf is this? Do you see me say "as a white artist" ? No! And anyway art is not about making money, it's about expressing yourself. If you want to make money it's not art, it's a business, you sell a service or a piece of art that you may or may not have created. How many would he able to sing on YouTub, make music, make videogame etc, if technologies didn't help democratize more field. You would need a film team, a studio etc. Now all you need is a phone to make a movie... all you need is a computer and headphone to have a music studio. Now everyone can make art, be a director and create anything. Having basic understanding is still relevant to do any nice work, and if you are smart enough you create something even more crazy with your already existing knowledge + ai. But don't come around with your bipoc bullsh*t here, it doesn't fly. Enough with this and take responsibility for you inaction and limiting beliefs
@@Digit0wL LOL. It is AI companies that are literally touting their products as "democratizing" and increasing "equity" for BIPOC people and people with disabilities. So you're disgusted with me but not them? This is a response to that. And I actually point out that practically all artists are exploited, which is another reason I think stealing art from its original creators to train AI and, essentially, use those artists' art against them (putting those creators out of business) is immoral as well as likely illegal. But keep yelling and cursing senselessly. It's really helping your cause.
Im from Germany and right now I am in the last stage of my 5 year journey to become a teacher in elementary school. Its rediculous that i have to hold on to a curriculum that was updated in 2014. Approximately next year around this time I will write an essay based on this, so that the people of the government that are watching my teaching sample will be proud of me lol. Its insane how they teach teachers to not teach creativity. I doubt germany is the only country which cant adapt fast enough. I remember that my grandparents couldnt handle the internet and smartphones. Lately my parents were unsatisfied with the development in TikTok/ social media and the risks that change the society right now. I hope that I can be a better person, even knowing that AI is hard to handle....We need to try to go with the flow like Dr. Li Jiang said and teach our children that there is no need to be afraid ♥ (even if its human to be afraid).
I have a webdevelopment degree, bachelor in ux and now following a masters in data driven design. Learn to embrace ai as a tool not a replacement for skill. Its about learning to solve new type of problems, and let ai solve the old ones. Chat gpt is a good example. When solving a problem with searching on google you search for context. Through langue models like chat gpt context comes to you systemically, learn the difference and you will be future proof.
Great interview! I truly believe that we should learn to use A.I. instead of fear it. Given that we cannot compete with A.I. in terms of memory and processing power based on pure brute strength, we should focus on value creation from 0-->1
Oh yes, it's all about "value creation" while this disruptive technology upends the lives of millions who aren't as hip as you and the AI movers and shakers.
@@flickwtchr it sounds like to me that youre saying this like its a bad thing.. people tend to think when something new comes and completely revolutionizes everything, "forces" a new way of living that that makes it bad or evil which is silly cause Capitalism hasnt always existed, and it wont always exist.. something will eventually replace it.. thats just facts and to believe otherwise is rly niave. While it'll 'upend' alotve jobs that people depend on to survive.. itll also create an unprecedented urgency for a UBI. I know to some may think that sounds scary bcs, "socialism" but ya just gotta be a little more open minded, n what i mean by that... is just a little more open to consideration. I think about all the time people would actually have to do the things they enjoy, spend time with friends and family(or even make them), pursue interests and hobbies, pursue greater knowledge, explore, etc. Robots and AI could free humans to be able to experience being human.. to allow humans to evolve and transcend beyond the lines that separate us. To allow people the time to find true meaning in their lives.. Idk 🤷 but theres been opposition and fear based panic to EVERY revolutionary thing to come into existence since the beginning of time. humans naturally fear what we dont know or cant explain and do it without second thought..and thats outve our lingering but still present survival instincts that were obviously needed in those periods of times. Idk.. maybe AI can free us from that too.. 🤷 again idk. I mean, i know some.. but im open tonthe possibilities. I just think it would better serve humanity as a whole if people focused their energy more on the possible goods. Thats not saying to turn a blind eye.. but to put more trust into the possible positive aspects. like.. you ever been in a situation, where you really didnt want something to happen..like, maybe you didnt wanna mess up saying something specific to someone, but then you did anyway.. and ^ou p$olly fee it was in large part because of all the energy and focus you built up on avoiding it? I think most people have had a similar experience... That^ is my concern with how much humanity focuses on all the negative. We focus so much on it that we end up writing our own fate. 🤷 lol i hope thats not how it is.. but if i linger on that thought and dont just recognize that it can/could happen, itll make me believe it IS true and ill end up sad and depressed which will ensure more negative outcomes for me bcs of the way everything else responds to my negativity.. and then thatll make me believe what i thought to be true originally fulfilling the prophecy. idk im prolly just crazy 😂🤷ohwell take care :)
@@ohno6325 Look, I'm not talking about fantastical notions here. I'm making the argument that this technology is FAR outpacing the ethical considerations and discussions regarding the implications to society. Good luck to all of us, we are going to need it.
Some amazing insights in here! I am very curious to see how AI will speed up medical research since a lot of the chart review is manually done by someone and is very tedious and slow. The comments about going with the flow of progress and all design is redesign was very helpful as well! Puts into perspective about how we should adjust to AI in the coming years
One good example is to look up the story of Jack Adraka. He was 15 when he invented a early detection cancer test. his biggest challenge was scientic research articles where all Paywall LOCKED through various universities. CHAT GTP is BREAK that paywall model, and allow anyone to research medical in the future.
AI is a passage that we will and have to go through. It is a step before another great innovation that will come even faster than AI came since we evolve so fast. We will have to learn how to use AI and tech because otherwise, we’ll probably be used by people understanding it. Anyways, I’m thrilled to be in this space and time where innovation is growing so fast that you don’t even know where we’ll be in 5 years! The entropy is going high💪🏻
You won't feel this way when most jobs become redundant. Thats where this is all leading to. When employers have to choose over you and an ai they will choose ai every time. No downtime . No leave. No mistakes ......on and on
@@KP-ky1sn yep and I have no problem with that. Jobs are part of a centralized system that incentivizes people to give their time and energy for a currency that has no real value. Indeed AI will steal a lit of jobs and for the better. It will also create a lot and free people form most of the toxicity of the current system. We’ll have more time to enjoy our lives freely but mostly, we’ll have time to do more research and evolve way faster! All redondant and repetitive tasks will be taken care of by machines so it’s kind of a win-win situation for us.
@@EviLPlayeR04 while your assessment appears sound i am still not convinced until i start seeing evidence of how people lives will be improved. There are way too many people who are currently struggling to find any type of job just so they can stay afloat. The current social system needs to change but I'm worried about the centralization of power that AI might usher in. Those who are privelaged often undervalue the struggles of others.
Love this guy. I would just to correct him on one thing. Adults do not loose the dreams that they had when they were children. It is the jobs, responsibilities, bills etc that just kills us on the inside.
@@HeadStronger-HS It's not fair these people have worked so hard to earn this skill These artists truly deserve respect All these years people have been hurting artists and now we are continuing to hurt them even more What an ungrateful world😢 I think I will continue to support artists
@@new-bp6ixI think as art AI like Midjourney become more advanced, it’s inevitable that many artists will eventually lose their jobs. But that change should be a slow and gradual one otherwise it would suddenly put a lot of people out of jobs, so I do think more laws should be put in place to limit what AI can do.
I think just like you about your goal! In the place I live the people needs more education. I dream about a concept for the last decade, something in my mind tells me that everyday.
Its a complex decision. I used Autocorrect on my phone. Within a year I felt that I had a dependency on it for basic spellings. It was a mess. Same goes for calcuators. These things like spellings and calculations when done manually develop brain and cognitive functioning. If a kid develops a dependency on thechnology early, its will lead to an unfit brain development. However it depends on the curriculum schools will make in order to have a overall cognitive development. In such case whole curriculum may need to be changed. It can be a better thing or maybe not.
I agree. AI is no doubt an extremely powerful technology that can create benefits and opportunities, but I think we should also take a step back and think about its implications it’ll have in the long term. Like you said, over dependency on technology can lead to degrades in skills. There’s a reason why especially in college, it is recommended to take notes by hand instead of typing, and understand how to apply formulas in different situations and work in variables rather than plugging everything in to a calculator. I fear over reliant on such technology can hinder future generations on things like writing, critical thinking, and creativity. Currently it feels like the technology is developing at a pace faster than institutions and regulations can keep up. Sorry for such a long rant on a RUclips comment because its a really deep topic😅
I hate school with the soul, flesh, and bone as a person who achived a diploma. But I don't deny I had the most applicable knowledge during High School. The fact they are centered around outdated molasses paced inconsistently contradicting fossilized lawmaker decisions making Curriculum is where I point my finger on all of our problem.
After going to university, I slightly agree. Understanding the math, reasoning behind it, and what it does is important. Once you know that, use a calculator. There is no legitimate reason to ever do a complex calculation for a project by hand. The most important thing you learn in university isn't any specific subject. It's learning how to find and learn any information you want.
@@AZ-zz4kn Yeah I also thought about that, people becoming dependent on AI instead of seeing it as a **extension** to your mind and body. Because if we treat AI as a replacer for the mind and body, it will result in negative consequences. People who develop AI need to take into account that AI should only facilitate things which we should be able to do without it, just in a larger scale of time.
Even if you want to use the AI in its full potential, you need to learn the basics and because of that you need to study. Let’s say you have a quantum computer but you don’t know how to use it, so what’s the point of having it. On the other hand a quantum computer is a blessing to a scientist, so to be a scientist you must study basics, get deeper and then you can use AI to solve problems. In future people will use AI to solve problems but there is a catch, you have to be better at something to use prompt, get the right answers and then tweak it further to use it at your own advantage. What will happen is if we needed 10 person to do a single job, now we will be able to do the same job with 2-3 person, with the help of AI. People are gonna loose job and it’s inevitable, it’s like survival of the fittest.
Recenly inventor Tom Furness reminisced about how having a toy robot when he was a kid (one I still have from when I was little!) influenced his ability to imagine the heads-up display we now experience as virtual reality. The toy literally had a sort of ‘scope’ in the back of its head through which a child could see things from the POV of the robot. Just this week as I consulted my ‘Dick Tracy’ wristwatch, watched a new episode of a favorite SciFi franchise on a “2001 A Space Odyssey”-style handheld TV screen, then had a conversation with an artificially intelligent ‘robot’ about the Socratic method, I realized I now get to play with most of the inventions that my inner child once could only dream of. (With the exception, so far, of jet packs and flying cars.) So tonight I happen across this professor speaking of the necessity of children being encouraged to have just such dreams -so that one day their fantasies can become everyone’s reality!
This is a brilliant perspective. There's a lot of negativity surrounding AI right now, especially with AI art because of how the raw data was gathered without permission. The AI itself is not the problem here, but rather how the humans behind it made certain choices. Now they are charging money for subscriptions to use these AI art tools and making lots of money from what was essentially free labour without consent. If they had only used images for training the AI that they had permission to use, and/or they offered the AI art tools for free without paid subscriptions, there wouldn't be the same negative backlash. Now we have a lot of people angry and they want to opt out of using AI because of how the tool was developed. These companies are already facing lawsuits and that could have been avoided. We can point out that AI is inevitable and we have to embrace it, yes, but also as Dr Jiang points out, we have to use our human empathy to solve problems or we won't get effective solutions.
At the moment I think regulations just haven’t caught up to the pace the technology is advancing. AI is here to stay, and eventually almost everyone will have to use it, I won’t deny that. But at the current state, it feels like it’s built upon unethical practices and who can profit the most out the the entire AI race while trampling on the hard work of millions of others with no regards. I’m just hoping that regulations will eventually catch up, like with most major technologies, so that it is built on an ethical foundation and safeguard against malicious intents
The problem with competition is that whereas its original meaning was to strive together, the more current one is to beat the other person(s) to the finish line and win the prize by whatever means. The fact is that information-based technologies have their limits when it comes to resolving the many challenges to humanity, with most subconsciously created by us human beings. Sadly, the narratives now needed for our species' sustainability are so far outside any of our current technologies or hand-me-down belief systems that they might as well not exist at all.
It all depends on what you are looking for. All I need for my life is a All knowing Creator with a set of rules and regulations. Absolutely nothing beyond that is necessary for a fulfilling life. People need far less for their happiness than they think they need. They just need someone to watch over them and keep accountable, which still falls in the realm of Christianity. Nothing has changed, people always will be the same.
It's not just that people have lost interest in their dreams as much as: 1) it's more difficult than expected (or it can be more difficult than expected), 2) the rules change when you grow up, and there are plenty of them. 3) sometimes those dreams just aren't worth it, or they divert too much from society's "expectations". The one can get pretty lost. But at the end it boils down to ones mentality and how he/she adapts to life. There are those who can adapt and those who can't, period. If chatGTP or AI can help out the latter, i might be amazed (since they are tools, one must know how to use them, or the results can be catastrophic).
creativity consists in my eyes of: - the ability to identify, access and apply your known rules for manipulating a group of objects - the ability to reckognize and learn distinct rules for manipulating a group of objects - the ability to abstract and expand your known rules by treating your set of rules as a new group of objects on which your rules can be applied a group of objects can be divided, merged, sorted, stacked, aligned ... those rules can be expanded by calling a sorted stack, a sorted alignment and 2-weight-sorted group new rules to play with. The abraction, their meta-rule was rule-addition. Other meta-rules could be rule-chaining or rule-reversing.. the more ideas, the more flexible the mind is. The more flexible the mind, the easier to be creative
Well, I think this is the perfect time to learn some technical or manual habilities like cookery, bakery, pastry, mechanic repair, plumber, carpinter, electrician etc Things that you can do with your hands. I personally like cookery and pastry, but only wjen I have to cook pr bake for my family, haha ( not lazy)
I am happy to be the commenter that points out that this is a problem with capitalism, not with AI. At some point we have to ask if it's really worth keeping these needlessly rich people in power, or if we should get rid of them and seize the means of production back for the people.
WOW! I can only imagine how ChatGPT will help those who are Neurodivergent, Autistic, etc. learn because the current system is not meeting any of their needs. Exciting!
That is the tricky part. When children learning basic knowledge, it is also a process that they develop their way of thinking skills especially critical thinking skills. If children use AI in early stage, they might relay on it for its convenience and start to lose their own ability of deep thinking. That is my experience with chat gpt, when I ask some questions and it give me some answers that actually different from my beliefs or from my value. However children are in the stage they don’t have those strong opinions of their values and beliefs yet. So how to make sure young generations are not going to be brain washed by AI and their designers and loose critical thinking abilities?
@@flickwtchr That's not even the point . "Emphatize toward the situation and problem" to make correct "logical solution based on creativity", is what he's talking about. The fundamental "0 and 1", logic gate, and now Natural Language Processing, is just a further advancement of human and machine interaction, nothing more, nothing less. Emphaty is also just one of many ethical requirement of any kind of interaction, with it's own of right,and balance proportion.
I mean, it's the bare minimum when dealing with such an overpowering technology that can easily destroy humanity. What are the guarantees that a man-made, everlasting, self learning, and lawless technology of which most of us know nothing about, except that it has most of our personal, financial, and even health data will not turn against us, due to a conclusion brought by by a purely logical algorithm? For real, how do you program empathy onto a machine? Millennia of existence for humans still hasn't proven enough to give us biological beings a strong sense of empathy, enough to address important divisive issues in the world, and we're trusting that newly developed artificially intelligence machines will be able to program themselves towards empathy, with the data assembled from the chaos of human civilization up until now? I find it extremely nerve wrecking to know that we're basically training AI in all our weaknesses as a civilization, yet know nothing about how to handle AI when it goes out of hand (which at this rate, is practically around the corner). We need to develop AI slower, and in a healthier way, and train every single person in the world to be a participant of AI construction, and not just a study subject for data compilation on masse.
Creativity cannot be taught in a classroom because those who seek answers are looking for hard definitions. To be creative is to be free from the standard rules and practices. By definition there is a finite amount of people that can be creative before a creative way of teaching becomes standard. The best way to become creative is to question everything, disregard most hard and fast rules, and be willing to accept judgment. Just know that deviating from what most people consider normal comes at a cost.
I'd say StableDiffusion is pretty darn creative. At the moment, it looks like AI is doing badly on numbers and truthfulness, so ironically the "boring" STEM and handiwork jobs are going to be spared at first, unlike creative jobs.
@@wyqtor It won't. Its just polarize art. I looked up non english based internet and all of them says the same thing. Until you proven the robot can make their own Oriental style Artwork after Algorithmic Disgorgement reset, we are still buy Taiwanese, Japanese, Indian, Malayan, and Korean arts. Also this snippet, "Art is more accessible you say, but you're going to take a deaf, mute, and impaired people's works too?" Oh and not to mention Miyazaki's, "I seen my disabled neighbors struggling to greet or doing high five. To see this, I think it is an insult to life itself." Can't wait next year where "Made by Humans!!!" becomes a marketing jargon by AI Tech Corporations. Definitely going to keep me sane.
Everything he said is right, but what I find myself asking more these days is: will there be enough jobs for every human? Should we start thinking about ways to guarantee everyone a decent life? (I think we should've long ago, but with AI the matter is even more impending).
So long as we have finite resources in comparison to our wants/needs, there will always be jobs. Look at the industrial revolution. 1 person could do the work of 50 but there are still plenty of jobs around.
This assumes that AI will remain narrow in the tasks it can perform. Once we AGI which many believe could happen within a decade then even our creativity won't be a huge advantage over AI
The line in the sand is simple: if life for the majority becomes harder with AI, the majority needs to overthr0w the system. We should not let the wealth and power concentrate further into the hands of a smaller group.
In an oppressive system, yes. But in an open market, nobody is preventing access to these knowledge and tools. In an open market, you either spend your time improving or spend your time complaining and get left behind. Left behind not only by the "rich and powerful", but by your neighbours, your neighbouring cities and your neighbouring countries.
Access EO's premium & unreleased content in EO Builders, a community of thriving founders & future builders worldwide 👉bit.ly/42DVV9L
✅Meet the founders featured on EO through Builders Webinars
✅Join Cohort-based learning programs from top-tier VCs and thoght leaders
✅Be a part of the global network of driven entrepreneurs
I'm 61 and using AI, it's a game changer for learning, it's like having your own personal tutor who doesn't get pissed off with a barage of endless questions about new or unknown terms or definitions. Wish this was around 40 years ago.
@@Ezra-wy7ux Same argument that was presented in the 70s and 80s. Robots are going to take all our jobs but what actually happened was an upshift to new skill sets and technologies. After all this time the Luddites are still about. Bet your kind of thinking doesn't extend to the technologies that bring you water, energy, your car, mobile phone and every other comfort that you enjoy 🙄
Such a systematic and integrated thinker yet personable and practical. I would be so lucky to learn from someone like this.
Agreed
Yes…. Me too
Right? I also can feel that he is a wise educator.
absolutely. his systematic explanation with his style gave me some vision that I'd like to keep in mind as well as passion to learn more for the coming new era.
I don't want some ivy league snob telling me how it's going to be.
As a UX designer I was NOT expecting Design Thinking to come up here but it makes perfect sense at the same time.
Design Thinking will be integrated to everything. How to create a restaurant menu to how to design behaviours of your kids. Future will be interesting. Fellow UX designer.
Same here, DT is my deep interest, but came here for AI :)
@@thusspokezarathustra1847 'design behaviors of your kids'?
I mean, it's pretty much a no-brainer. I'm actually more surprised people need to be told to do that.
@@thusspokezarathustra1847 Everyone's a "UX designer " these days 😅
I agree with him 💯. Our kids need to learn how to interact with the existing technology and at a time when they are most creative. This guy is brilliant. We need more educators thinking this way
I agree with *you* 100%. (: IMO, It’s terrible that students are even prohibited from using technology that they will need as basic skills when they become adults. Dunno if anyone here is older than I am (: but I remember the days when calculators were banned in school. Kids learning AI today will be making decisions on what AI technology to use in their companies.
How much time until AI gets creative?, imagine you base the education of an entire generation on the creative process and in the moment they get to the working life AI replace them too...our brain has nothing magical, creativity can be AI simulated too, probably in a couple of years you will be able to adjust the level of metaphorical references in the AI essay that is directly related to you browse history so you can catch all the "winks"...the moment has not yet arrive but we have to face that in the future we would be physically and intellectually expendable.
University professors are so full of themselves.
We cant even handle smart phones and social media appropriatly.
I have never met a particularly creative child. I’m sure they exist (but even Mozart’s early compositions are vastly inferior to his mature output). Children churn out lots of garbled nonsense, because their brains are undeveloped, but that isn’t creativity. And a lot of their "active imagination", upon examination, is usually the product of media they are consuming (produced by creative, adult artists).
This is just as sentimental and ill-founded as the romantic "all children are naturally curious, until the system beats it out of them" meme. Some children are curious, yes; some adults are curious, too. In my experience most adults and most children are shockingly incurious. Teachers’ jobs would be much easier if most children were naturally curious about science! If children ask more questions, it is simply because they are more ignorant about the most basic and useful things.
Maybe I’m wrong here. But probably this perspective just rarely gets expressed? (I am fully anticipating a telling off for being a curmudgeon).
This video was so packed with valuable information, no empty words no fillers. In just less than 10 minutes he got to explain the basis of design thinking with examples. But not just that it was about how to teach children, how the education has to be, how to cope with the change. Dr. Li Jiand is a man I will need to follow.
Oh gosh, the little people shuffling around rearranging their lives so AI Big Tech can make hand over fist billions as millions and millions will be devastated by the disruption that the little people are just supposed to accept as a given. It drives me nuts, this narrative of what humans must now do to accommodate the future determined by a relative handful of AI movers and shakers.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 this guy is a joke, it's nothing but hip catch phrases.
@@peterbelanger4094 I didn't catch any of the promised strategies. His assessment method was really questionable, too.
@@rosstulloch8100 I think the only strategy he suggested is "embrace it."
I feel a bit on edge, thinking that this whole thing could have been generated in Blender by a 14 year old.
No it isn't. Bunch of fluff
He is very sincere and honest teacher. My Hundred salute for your sir
I watched it two times and took notes! Dr. Li Jiang, thank you for sharing and I hope these ideas are applied by teachers and students of all ages everywhere, specially children. 👏🏼👍🏼
Bro, pls share the notes here as well.
@@amitkumargupta-write ur own 😂😂
@@amitkumargupta- How lazy are you omg 😂
"The first step is to empathize."
Please let this be the foundation of AI! 🙏
Empathy isn’t enough. Narcissists are highly empathetic, but then use their understanding of the emotional dynamic of a situation to manipulate others. AI needs, like people, to have understanding and prioritization of avoiding harm.
@@LordAus123 no they are not empathetic… they pretend. They almost have none or a little bit.
Li is such an energetic and inspiring educator and researcher. Look forwards to seeing more of his talks.
I worked with manufacturing efficiency for many years and have since retired. Just one of management's methods for solving problems was the DMAIC method. Define the problem, Measure the problem, Analyse the results, Implement the control method, and Control through measurement. And we taught this method to all of our employees.
This is one of the best sub-10-minute content I have seen around. EO comes up with great topics, speakers, and production quality.
I think that’s the part that’s worrying for me because creativity has always been my strongest trait. This is the first time AI started encroaching in that space, and it’s no longer feeling as irreplaceable.
And someone who profits from this crap telling us how wonderful it is while promising strategies and giving none is an additional cause for worry. I wish governments would shut this crap down so that society can keep up. This is too much change too suddenly. I don't want to read something written by AI no matter how good it is. I know why Han treated C3PO like shit.
You have to think creatively, imagine the things you could create using ai as a paintbrush
@@roadrash2005 creating art via ai to me is rather dull and unpleasant process. Like clicking a button in a factory. No thank you. It poses no challenge and provides me no joy or feeling of being proud. Most undesired paintbrush someone could give me.
@@haganame1240 Van Gogh would probably say the same thing about digital art. Yet that’s what you have to use in the modern world. Either learn how to utilize the tech beyond clicking a button or get left behind.
@@haganame1240 What's the point of art? Look nice? NO
Art is made to influence, give vision, tell us something, move the way we think, bring emotions, represent a pattern from reality.
A thing made by artist isn't ART.
Art is what can function as art.
I have taught creative thinking in the artistic perspective since i was 23. Its the most important type pf learning a person can receive besides critical thinking. It should literally be taught from kindergarten to university consistently.
How is this bringing more peace, joy and love to humanity? Those are the most important. Sometimes people lose the plot and just create tech without thinking of the big picture.
Incredible video. One could say that instead of giving the student a problem to solve. Asking them to think about a "problem" that can be solve will certainly spark some creativity and outside of the box thinking. Although Chat-gpt also can do it, for some topics involving emotions or feelings will be out of the equation.
Not true, chat gpt is smarter then most therapist . Ask it some emotional questions
chat gpt has a politically correct US west coast liberal bias. it does not answer the truth to any question that might challenge that. therefore it's ineffective at tackling deeply human topics for 99% of the human population
As a Computer Science student, our department allows use to use ChatGPT for schoolwork. But they boldly highlight the ethical usage of AI, and being able to use AI as a stepping stool and not a "spoon feeding" tool. In my opinion, I think that as someone who is not studying computer science or anything related to CS or IT, being able to understand how the AI works, and also knowing the concepts learned in this video will greatly help you survive in the era of AI.
Major shoutout to my college department for promoting these tools instead of being a karen about it.
I think one great solution for ai era is to do things personally instead of written homework at home for example. Then teachers can really analyze how their students are evolving the teachings, also stimulate more personal interaction than use ai as a secondary tool to help instead of do the work all by itself
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 He deserves a round of applause. I heard that the best learning institutions were teaching their students how to use ChatGTP. This technology is an incredible tool.
And where did you "hear" that?
Funny, what is there to learn? It's a chatbot, ask, and see what comes out. Write something like:
Imagine your are an AI professor at Standford university. Give me 10 reasons, why AI will destroy lots of jobs in 1000 words. 🤣
@@flickwtchr From representatives of the institutions themselves.
I know it's incredible.... It's taking me ahead and teaching me things before my tutors are teaching me, giving me an Opportunity to look smart from being a worse student.
@@Theguywithspectacles That is one of the first things I thought of! If schools realised the potential of ChatGPT they would ensure every student had it in class, where it could act as a personal tutor at every student's desk, with the teacher guiding the whole process. It would accelerate student's learning!
I've been thinking about creativity and education for so long. This really validates my whole thought process. We gotta teach people to work with the future that's being created. And how to stay human through it all
Our entire education system is designed to destroy individuality in all it's forms and turn people into cogs.
Humans are obsolete. It's just a delayed reaction.
Nah that's silly. Saying that neglects the various different human societies and cultures. I would say Ai threatens the status quo of the current capitalist system
@@Dianetics.Junior Machine intelligence will vastly exceed all forms of human intelligence. It won't be close. Why would machines care about "different human societies"?
@@GuaranteedEtern ya sure, but being human isn't exclusively about intelligence. And we don't live in enough of a monoculture that every human quality will be outdone by AI. It's possible that we are barreling towards a dystopian quality of life imbalance, but it's more likely that our societal values will shift. Being human is never irrelevant. Being a whale isn't irrelevant. Extrinsic value will just change.
Dr. Jiang just taught me something new but was all there all along. "All design is redesign" omg
Thank you so much for sharing this video
I learned a lot and im not even in the tech industry.
Its so simple i can put all of his pointers into action as soon as I can
which minute he said that please
Well, sir, we need more people like you in the world! Thank you for a wonderful video 😊
Yes this should be discussed in school and general public
I worked as an ex-data scientist at a sizable corporation. Im watching this after automating an entire team, replacing them. But they left a junior and fired the entire team and me(im not in the team) last week.
I understand the logistics behind it: they think they can train the junior to monitor, let let go of me cause i get 3x more pay.
If things were good and expanding they woulda kept me but as they get into survival mode they simply want the least cost.
While i think that’s the dumbest decision, non-tech executives dont know that and dont care. I honestly thought i would be the one to survive if i am the one optimizing and automating things.
Im honestly lost as where to go cause things wont be too different in different companies as even top tech companies are laying people off at a massive scale, and i think it has more than just the economy to account for.
This means we have to evolve to adapt on this rapid change that technological advancement is affording us. Let us discover, try and secure opportunities to thrive in this ever changing world.
@Kuya B right, we need to start working on a cannibalistic ai virus.
@@peterharrell7305 Your sarcasm is pathetic at best. I'm sorry.
@@kuyab9122 I know it comes off that way, but I'm not completely joking.
Wow I didn't see that coming. I thought they were going to replace all juniors for AI first 😮
This is definitely useful for kids and there future and for people who are disabled, me being shot from my neck down really has took a toll on me asking people to help me, or even being took advantage of being in the wheelchair by over charging someone in my condition more than it cost for assistance or digital aspects of marketing books, music or scripts, i definitely appreciate it alot
Such an inspiring tutor for students, quite sure many students enjoy his lectures and get valuable knowledge.
I am really happy that i found this video and absolutely proved that i'm not the crazy person that i think in the way that the Stanford AIRE Director explains some very important key points for the future of learning . Absolutely big congrats on the way of thinking 👐
Based on my experience in the past , i was kind of a person that always was looking to cheat the system , like a back door in the school , then in university was the same . I would say there are 2 ways of teaching !
The one (oldest conservative version ) : key words - mandatory , must be , if not read .... - students get penalized due to not following the conservative frame of the school or the teacher . This type of learning for me was the most boring and always as usual took the poorest scores ,as simply this way is cutting the way of 'implanting the seeds' for interest in learning to the students.
The second one ( new free version ) : key words - empathy , positivism , embrace creativity , exploring , allows the technology .... - this is the path that a lot of teachers and lecturers need to understand the constant improvement in the way of how the information needs to be provided and share their knowledge is the crucial for their personal success and the future success to the students .
The key point here is if they teach for the basic salary , or for the final outcome of their students .
Back in the time I had to do Essay on topic - Will the mouse eat the book ?
Well , now i would like to ask my teacher - The result of Singularity + Sentient = ?
I would like to believe that is = Creativity
If this does not help, maybe the answer is hiding somewhere between "onward - backward" , "logic - not logic" thinking , but definitely between 0 and 1 :)
Awesome. The old education system is out of style. You still were and are not wrong. Let the bell ring
I hate to say this but as students, you (I mean you students collectively, not you personally) don't really have an appreciation yet for how necessary that mandatory knowledge is. You're still learning, you haven't actually had years of experience at work and encountering all kinds of problems related to work. You may think that piece of knowledge is useless, a waste of time. You want to cut corner. But that's gonna make your knowledge full of holes like Swiss cheese, and it'll bite you back later when you actually need it. Teachers and the education system know what you'll most likely need, because they've spent years figuring that out. That's why they make you study them.
I myself was once like you (we all are). I've spent my uni years studying classes that were so boring and "a waste of time". But now when I've gone through years of PhD study and become a uni lecturer myself, I'm actually grateful for those classes. In my lab and in my classes, I've seen many other students struggle with problems that to me is like "why haven't you learned this in 1st year?" because they've had a different curriculum than me.
Why can't we have both, old and new? as i've learned, everybody learns different ways. it is not like 'One size fits all'
@@kasalibang7206 Of course in a utopia world, it would be best if each person was educated according to what they'd need. But it's not logistically feasible. Even you yourself won't know for certain what kind of job you'll end up doing in 5-10 years time, and what kind of knowledge you'd need accordingly. So the education system is set up to teach everyone the knowledge that you'll statistically most likely need in the future.
Furthermore, schools and unis don't just have obligations to the students. One of their functions and duties is to grade and evaluate the students, so that employers (and society in general) can base on that to assign the jobs most fitted to individuals. That's why we have exams, GPAs, degrees, and why teachers require you to have certain knowledge to pass the classes/curriculums.
He touched upon a very important contemporary topic after rapid technological development happening around us regarding reshape of education delivery systems in the era of AI
I think Dr. Li is totally on the right track. I wholeheartedly agree with his 0 to 1 vision. I think that is a KEY IDEA that needs to be implemented in the current educational system ASAP. Overall, a very refreshing exposure of a critical topic for the future of education and for the future of humanity.
I hope education follows your thinking! I strongly believe AI can be an Ally if leveraged well, and indeed I believe we need to teach people how to use it. I'm also encouraging my kids to use it and learn how to use it better to their advantage. ❤
Italy chose a radically opposite direction to" ban what you fear", and banned ChatGPT... What a shame.
@Anvandarnamn Why would you think I do?
@Anvandarnamn i do think we have to see it a tool that we can use. Like a powerful technology it can have lots of applications, some will be bad some will be good. It's a new revolution. Like the industrial revolutions, the steam power, internet,... Imagine if we vetted steam power... Or fire 🔥... We'd still live in dark caves.
@@Anvandarnamn1234 i think you originally meant to say "You OVERestimate humans". a simple typo made a whole mess of your thoughts
@@yeahboi7562 when the war started in Ukraine, we got offline because the Russians destroyed our electricity infastructure. I did not have any work for 3 months, got a huge bank credit to buy powerbanks, and now cannot even fix my teeth (and I lost almost 10 teeth after they occupied my town and held us there in cold winter without food). I am also unable to work in any other fields because all my life I have been focused on jobs connected with computers, mainly teaching English online, and they stopped working when the Russians shut down the Internet. The whole country survived thanks to foreign humanitarian aid of food and clothes, and fuel. We were so poor.
I remember what happened to people's calculation skills when they got calculators. I still remember this because in my country school pupils started using calculators when I was in the 4th year of school. After a couple years nobody was able to do simple calculations, and we had to carry that calculator in our pocket, physically.
Now we are moving into the age when almost all thinking skills are going to be performed by bots. And the climate is changing, and the political situation is getting worse and worse with more militarization.
I cannot imagine what the people of the future are goin to eat when some Chinorussia destroys their power stations and Internet lines. Those Starlinks will also be shot down by anti-satellites.
I am thinking about how to safeguard my survival in those scenarios, and I wonder what you would suggest (and don't propose solar batteries, they will be useless when you have to migrate to another location).
Enhancing human creativity on peak using these tools will be a survival for mankind!
I feel educated and confident about the future with AI. What an educator Dr. Li Jiang is! Well spent 9:36 mins!
So happy someone is really working towards changing the education system.
It's nice to see that schools are also forward thinking and prevent jobs being lost to technology. I'm on Bluewillow and been teaching myself some prompt engineering just in case.
whats prompt engineering?
@@powerball200 fancy way of saying "i ask stuffs to chatgpt"
you dont need to learn course to get better at prompt engineering lol. just experiment with chatgpt for 1-2 days on stuff you actually know about, there are free chatgpt APIs all over black hat forums
@@donnieamz2938 link to blachhat forums
AI is our God., it will do everything and anything at a whim.
7:58 Instead of three days you have two hours to do the homework but students still have to proofread and edit, fine-tune instructions, basically make it their own.
Early education will be even more fundamental in the area of ChatGPT.
homework will be even more mediocre than ever 😅
I don’t think you realize how powerful ChatGPT can be. A student can use it to fine-tune and make the work their own.
You are creating a future of kids who are going to be mentally and creatively atrophied at the service of their robot masters. That is a fact. These ai people know technology, know science, but they are not smart enough to see what they are creating.
Democratizing art via AI is exactly as described: non-creative people who can now fake being creative because the machine made them look really good. Congratulations. Your contribution to Art was a creative prompt.
Dr. Jiang, some questions for you: I can see the usefulness of AI for finding cures for diseases and helping business owners write copy. However, I think AI does more harm than good in the arts.
Having taken art from artists without their consent in order to train AI, such as ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, AI allows users to create work “in the style of” a specific artist or to input an artist’s name and output work that seems as though it was created by that artist. This directly uses that artist’s talent against them and diminishes their ability to make a living from their art. How is this empathetic? And why can’t AI companies simply remove this function, which, essentially, steals an artist’s originality and can lead to forgeries, copyright infringement, identity theft, and deepfakes? Even if an artist does not upload their work, others may do this, and so as long as we allow “in the style of” prompts and other prompts that allow users to input artists’ names, we are effectively pushing out people who are creative and replacing them with people who are less creative. How is that better for society?
I also do not understand why we are expected to readily embrace this technology when it’s clear that those behind it haven’t thought through its impacts on society. It’s nice that you want to figure out how to make AI work with education, but shouldn’t that have been a forethought rather than an afterthought? How many students will become overly reliant on AI before solutions are offered and widely disseminated? If we have even one generation of undereducated professionals in the medical and scientific fields, shouldn’t that be cause for real concern? And why weren’t teachers trained in how to spot work created by AI before this technology was released?
I dont think you understand ai very well.... you don't choose ai, like you don't chose a kid, you teach him once the structure is operational (when it's born) there is a lot of things you cant think of. AI isn't hurting arts, it is democratizing it. Everyone will be able to do anything. Problem is humanity does not have enough wisdom as a whole, people have no goals, no meaning in their life, they are on cruise control. Ai will sweep everyone and the majority is not ready mentally. It is happening whether we want it or not. There is no huge router somewhere that we can simply unplug/plug to restart. Ai is stealing artist? What's the difference between learning an artist and. Trying to reproduce it ? Design is redesigning. The only thing that change is the time it takes
@@Digit0wL I think the problem is that the tech community doesn't want to acknowledge that the process by which humans learn to create art is very different from that of AI and that copyright law was written for humans, not AI. Most professional artists attend schools or take online courses because, unlike AI, we cannot learn how to create excellent art by simply looking at copyrighted images on a screen or listening to copyrighted music. Usually, the process must be explained to you by someone else who also had it explained to them by someone else. You have to learn technique, theory, and (in most cases) technology. And in that learning process, every art teacher I have ever had has stressed the importance of developing one’s own unique style/voice as a condition for employment and survival. Standing apart from other artists-originality-is literally the bread and butter of every successful artist. Prompt engineers would like to “skip to the good part” by using the free labor of artists and stealing originality and voice under the guise of style. Note that Vice recently reported that much of the “art” that generative AI spits out is copyrighted and in over a third of cases, an exact copy of existing, copyrighted work. (See "AI Spits Out Exact Copies of Training Images, Real People, Logos, Researchers Find" by Chloe Xiang.)
This could mostly be solved very easily by not allowing users to input names of specific artists and not including work by living artists unless you have secured their consent.
@@Digit0wL Also, as a Black artist with a disability, it is infuriating to see tech corporations attempt to spin this as “democratizing” and an “equity” issue and go so far as to tout the use of their tech by some marginalized people as evidence that it is somehow progressive. There are BIPOC artists with disabilities whose work has likely been ripped off to feed these machines and to enable others to further rip off such artists. Also, as most know, artists are generally not privileged people. Many of us, even those who are not BIPOC and/or living with disabilities, struggle for decades to succeed in our crafts and make major sacrifices for the sake of our art. Few of us make the kind of money that the tech bros who are benefiting from this theft make. (This is particularly true for BIPOC artists who have disabilities and likely lack connections and, when disabilities are severe, employment opportunities.) A mantra of progressive movements should be: If your group’s path to success depends on the oppression of another already oppressed group, then it’s not a progressive path. It’s a divide-and-conquer strategy being used by the usual oppressors and you are merely a pawn in their colonial agenda.
@Sonar @Sonar I can't care less about bipoc and racial stuff, why the hell someone that is not bipoc is less relevant? Stop whining like a little B and try to look where you are. Why do you have to say that you are black artist?? What does it change? I am suppose to pitty you and obligated to like your art??? Wtf is this? Do you see me say "as a white artist" ? No! And anyway art is not about making money, it's about expressing yourself. If you want to make money it's not art, it's a business, you sell a service or a piece of art that you may or may not have created. How many would he able to sing on YouTub, make music, make videogame etc, if technologies didn't help democratize more field. You would need a film team, a studio etc. Now all you need is a phone to make a movie... all you need is a computer and headphone to have a music studio. Now everyone can make art, be a director and create anything. Having basic understanding is still relevant to do any nice work, and if you are smart enough you create something even more crazy with your already existing knowledge + ai. But don't come around with your bipoc bullsh*t here, it doesn't fly. Enough with this and take responsibility for you inaction and limiting beliefs
@@Digit0wL LOL. It is AI companies that are literally touting their products as "democratizing" and increasing "equity" for BIPOC people and people with disabilities. So you're disgusted with me but not them? This is a response to that. And I actually point out that practically all artists are exploited, which is another reason I think stealing art from its original creators to train AI and, essentially, use those artists' art against them (putting those creators out of business) is immoral as well as likely illegal. But keep yelling and cursing senselessly. It's really helping your cause.
I'm an educator, this is a great video. Thanks.
where was this guy all my life? I needed this guy as a teacher when I was young
Im from Germany and right now I am in the last stage of my 5 year journey to become a teacher in elementary school. Its rediculous that i have to hold on to a curriculum that was updated in 2014. Approximately next year around this time I will write an essay based on this, so that the people of the government that are watching my teaching sample will be proud of me lol. Its insane how they teach teachers to not teach creativity. I doubt germany is the only country which cant adapt fast enough. I remember that my grandparents couldnt handle the internet and smartphones. Lately my parents were unsatisfied with the development in TikTok/ social media and the risks that change the society right now. I hope that I can be a better person, even knowing that AI is hard to handle....We need to try to go with the flow like Dr. Li Jiang said and teach our children that there is no need to be afraid ♥ (even if its human to be afraid).
I have a webdevelopment degree, bachelor in ux and now following a masters in data driven design. Learn to embrace ai as a tool not a replacement for skill. Its about learning to solve new type of problems, and let ai solve the old ones. Chat gpt is a good example. When solving a problem with searching on google you search for context. Through langue models like chat gpt context comes to you systemically, learn the difference and you will be future proof.
To a point. Once a true general AI arrives and matures then basically everyone is out of a job.
everyone says" embrace AI" wait til you get fired
I hope that man gets obsolete some day so AI can purified this desease.
Learn Ai to Dismantle Ai...if the situation gets worse.
The era has just begun!
Great interview! I truly believe that we should learn to use A.I. instead of fear it. Given that we cannot compete with A.I. in terms of memory and processing power based on pure brute strength, we should focus on value creation from 0-->1
@Blue Bee we needa turn that social moral from 0-->1
It was like the 19 century can the machines be stronger than horses.
Oh yes, it's all about "value creation" while this disruptive technology upends the lives of millions who aren't as hip as you and the AI movers and shakers.
@@flickwtchr it sounds like to me that youre saying this like its a bad thing..
people tend to think when something new comes and completely revolutionizes everything, "forces" a new way of living that that makes it bad or evil which is silly cause Capitalism hasnt always existed, and it wont always exist.. something will eventually replace it.. thats just facts and to believe otherwise is rly niave. While it'll 'upend' alotve jobs that people depend on to survive.. itll also create an unprecedented urgency for a UBI. I know to some may think that sounds scary bcs, "socialism" but ya just gotta be a little more open minded, n what i mean by that... is just a little more open to consideration. I think about all the time people would actually have to do the things they enjoy, spend time with friends and family(or even make them), pursue interests and hobbies, pursue greater knowledge, explore, etc. Robots and AI could free humans to be able to experience being human.. to allow humans to evolve and transcend beyond the lines that separate us. To allow people the time to find true meaning in their lives..
Idk 🤷
but theres been opposition and fear based panic to EVERY revolutionary thing to come into existence since the beginning of time. humans naturally fear what we dont know or cant explain and do it without second thought..and thats outve our lingering but still present survival instincts that were obviously needed in those periods of times. Idk.. maybe AI can free us from that too.. 🤷 again idk. I mean, i know some.. but im open tonthe possibilities. I just think it would better serve humanity as a whole if people focused their energy more on the possible goods. Thats not saying to turn a blind eye.. but to put more trust into the possible positive aspects.
like.. you ever been in a situation, where you really didnt want something to happen..like, maybe you didnt wanna mess up saying something specific to someone, but then you did anyway.. and ^ou p$olly fee it was in large part because of all the energy and focus you built up on avoiding it? I think most people have had a similar experience...
That^ is my concern with how much humanity focuses on all the negative. We focus so much on it that we end up writing our own fate. 🤷 lol i hope thats not how it is.. but if i linger on that thought and dont just recognize that it can/could happen, itll make me believe it IS true and ill end up sad and depressed which will ensure more negative outcomes for me bcs of the way everything else responds to my negativity.. and then thatll make me believe what i thought to be true originally fulfilling the prophecy.
idk im prolly just crazy 😂🤷ohwell
take care :)
@@ohno6325 Look, I'm not talking about fantastical notions here. I'm making the argument that this technology is FAR outpacing the ethical considerations and discussions regarding the implications to society. Good luck to all of us, we are going to need it.
Finally!!! Insightful thinking instead of fear mongering.
Wow he seems like such a good teacher ✨I wish I had that homework assignment in school
Because it's really easy and you learn nothing. Beware of people who profit from AI telling you everything will be OK.
@rosstulloch8100 not gonna happen. eventually AI will become 100% open source and ethical regulations are coming in to place
One of the best interview watched this month! Thx so much..Dream big dream
Some amazing insights in here! I am very curious to see how AI will speed up medical research since a lot of the chart review is manually done by someone and is very tedious and slow. The comments about going with the flow of progress and all design is redesign was very helpful as well! Puts into perspective about how we should adjust to AI in the coming years
One good example is to look up the story of Jack Adraka. He was 15 when he invented a early detection cancer test. his biggest challenge was scientic research articles where all Paywall LOCKED through various universities. CHAT GTP is BREAK that paywall model, and allow anyone to research medical in the future.
UGH! I already hate how the medical industry uses AI to push out human jobs and interactions. Screw AI
The level of value is insane. I felt kind of stuck in my thinking process and this definitely helps
AI is a passage that we will and have to go through. It is a step before another great innovation that will come even faster than AI came since we evolve so fast. We will have to learn how to use AI and tech because otherwise, we’ll probably be used by people understanding it. Anyways, I’m thrilled to be in this space and time where innovation is growing so fast that you don’t even know where we’ll be in 5 years! The entropy is going high💪🏻
We have to defeat AI, so it can't be used against us.
As long as it doesn't take YOUR job.
You won't feel this way when most jobs become redundant. Thats where this is all leading to. When employers have to choose over you and an ai they will choose ai every time. No downtime . No leave. No mistakes ......on and on
@@KP-ky1sn yep and I have no problem with that. Jobs are part of a centralized system that incentivizes people to give their time and energy for a currency that has no real value. Indeed AI will steal a lit of jobs and for the better. It will also create a lot and free people form most of the toxicity of the current system. We’ll have more time to enjoy our lives freely but mostly, we’ll have time to do more research and evolve way faster! All redondant and repetitive tasks will be taken care of by machines so it’s kind of a win-win situation for us.
@@EviLPlayeR04 while your assessment appears sound i am still not convinced until i start seeing evidence of how people lives will be improved. There are way too many people who are currently struggling to find any type of job just so they can stay afloat. The current social system needs to change but I'm worried about the centralization of power that AI might usher in. Those who are privelaged often undervalue the struggles of others.
How stupendous this discussion is!
I love how you integrate the concept of Tao with AI and education. Subscribed...
Love this guy. I would just to correct him on one thing. Adults do not loose the dreams that they had when they were children. It is the jobs, responsibilities, bills etc that just kills us on the inside.
I hope artificial intelligence does not harm artists and animators, especially the animators who created these cartoons for us all
It already did. Its over
wish
It already has.. anything creative is being targeted.
@@HeadStronger-HS It's not fair these people have worked so hard to earn this skill
These artists truly deserve respect
All these years people have been hurting artists and now we are continuing to hurt them even more
What an ungrateful world😢
I think I will continue to support artists
@@new-bp6ixI think as art AI like Midjourney become more advanced, it’s inevitable that many artists will eventually lose their jobs. But that change should be a slow and gradual one otherwise it would suddenly put a lot of people out of jobs, so I do think more laws should be put in place to limit what AI can do.
I think just like you about your goal! In the place I live the people needs more education. I dream about a concept for the last decade, something in my mind tells me that everyday.
Its a complex decision. I used Autocorrect on my phone. Within a year I felt that I had a dependency on it for basic spellings. It was a mess. Same goes for calcuators. These things like spellings and calculations when done manually develop brain and cognitive functioning. If a kid develops a dependency on thechnology early, its will lead to an unfit brain development. However it depends on the curriculum schools will make in order to have a overall cognitive development. In such case whole curriculum may need to be changed. It can be a better thing or maybe not.
I agree. AI is no doubt an extremely powerful technology that can create benefits and opportunities, but I think we should also take a step back and think about its implications it’ll have in the long term. Like you said, over dependency on technology can lead to degrades in skills. There’s a reason why especially in college, it is recommended to take notes by hand instead of typing, and understand how to apply formulas in different situations and work in variables rather than plugging everything in to a calculator. I fear over reliant on such technology can hinder future generations on things like writing, critical thinking, and creativity. Currently it feels like the technology is developing at a pace faster than institutions and regulations can keep up. Sorry for such a long rant on a RUclips comment because its a really deep topic😅
I hate school with the soul, flesh, and bone as a person who achived a diploma. But I don't deny I had the most applicable knowledge during High School. The fact they are centered around outdated molasses paced inconsistently contradicting fossilized lawmaker decisions making Curriculum is where I point my finger on all of our problem.
After going to university, I slightly agree. Understanding the math, reasoning behind it, and what it does is important. Once you know that, use a calculator. There is no legitimate reason to ever do a complex calculation for a project by hand. The most important thing you learn in university isn't any specific subject. It's learning how to find and learn any information you want.
@@AZ-zz4kn Yeah I also thought about that, people becoming dependent on AI instead of seeing it as a **extension** to your mind and body. Because if we treat AI as a replacer for the mind and body, it will result in negative consequences. People who develop AI need to take into account that AI should only facilitate things which we should be able to do without it, just in a larger scale of time.
Even if you want to use the AI in its full potential, you need to learn the basics and because of that you need to study. Let’s say you have a quantum computer but you don’t know how to use it, so what’s the point of having it. On the other hand a quantum computer is a blessing to a scientist, so to be a scientist you must study basics, get deeper and then you can use AI to solve problems.
In future people will use AI to solve problems but there is a catch, you have to be better at something to use prompt, get the right answers and then tweak it further to use it at your own advantage. What will happen is if we needed 10 person to do a single job, now we will be able to do the same job with 2-3 person, with the help of AI. People are gonna loose job and it’s inevitable, it’s like survival of the fittest.
I love this talk, We're about to equip news skills sets in this era indeed
😘😘😘😘😘😘
Recenly inventor Tom Furness reminisced about how having a toy robot when he was a kid (one I still have from when I was little!) influenced his ability to imagine the heads-up display we now experience as virtual reality. The toy literally had a sort of ‘scope’ in the back of its head through which a child could see things from the POV of the robot. Just this week as I consulted my ‘Dick Tracy’ wristwatch, watched a new episode of a favorite SciFi franchise on a “2001 A Space Odyssey”-style handheld TV screen, then had a conversation with an artificially intelligent ‘robot’ about the Socratic method, I realized I now get to play with most of the inventions that my inner child once could only dream of. (With the exception, so far, of jet packs and flying cars.) So tonight I happen across this professor speaking of the necessity of children being encouraged to have just such dreams -so that one day their fantasies can become everyone’s reality!
Considering how good AI is getting at doing things, being able to compete against it may be an interesting approach on how to use it educationally.
Why would AI waste its time trying to educate humans? Machines learn at the speed of light - humans are inferior.
I think this is the video that everyone need to watch. Thank you!
On 'How do we invent new things', this one also is practical in doing research proposal lol. Thanks for giving me ideas for kicking start my writing.
Ph.D. candidate hhh
This is a brilliant perspective. There's a lot of negativity surrounding AI right now, especially with AI art because of how the raw data was gathered without permission. The AI itself is not the problem here, but rather how the humans behind it made certain choices. Now they are charging money for subscriptions to use these AI art tools and making lots of money from what was essentially free labour without consent. If they had only used images for training the AI that they had permission to use, and/or they offered the AI art tools for free without paid subscriptions, there wouldn't be the same negative backlash. Now we have a lot of people angry and they want to opt out of using AI because of how the tool was developed. These companies are already facing lawsuits and that could have been avoided. We can point out that AI is inevitable and we have to embrace it, yes, but also as Dr Jiang points out, we have to use our human empathy to solve problems or we won't get effective solutions.
At the moment I think regulations just haven’t caught up to the pace the technology is advancing. AI is here to stay, and eventually almost everyone will have to use it, I won’t deny that. But at the current state, it feels like it’s built upon unethical practices and who can profit the most out the the entire AI race while trampling on the hard work of millions of others with no regards. I’m just hoping that regulations will eventually catch up, like with most major technologies, so that it is built on an ethical foundation and safeguard against malicious intents
It's true--the problem seems to be those pesky humans. Some Sci Fi suggests that AI can fix that!!
As a homeschooling parent his Design Thinking blue print makes a lot sense- im def taking it to the next level
Wonderful video... Ai will change humanity it just that we need to steer it to the right direction...
I agree! I've been arguing with everyone that rthe differenceces between human intelligence VS AI was creativity!!! thank you Pr.!
Thank you for making and providing these fantastic videos 🔥💜
My pleasure!
I am excited about using the design thinking process with chatGPT!
The problem with competition is that whereas its original meaning was to strive together, the more current one is to beat the other person(s) to the finish line and win the prize by whatever means. The fact is that information-based technologies have their limits when it comes to resolving the many challenges to humanity, with most subconsciously created by us human beings. Sadly, the narratives now needed for our species' sustainability are so far outside any of our current technologies or hand-me-down belief systems that they might as well not exist at all.
what?
It all depends on what you are looking for. All I need for my life is a All knowing Creator with a set of rules and regulations. Absolutely nothing beyond that is necessary for a fulfilling life. People need far less for their happiness than they think they need. They just need someone to watch over them and keep accountable, which still falls in the realm of Christianity. Nothing has changed, people always will be the same.
I’m going start following this man, very smart guy indeed
Well spoken.thank you for your time sir,it was deeply appreciated
I totally agree with this guy. You cannot just avoid from this huge inventions Let the Ai helps you and find the way more efficient and creative
That's so knowledgeable. I learn a lot from that. Thank you so much for sharing this!
It's not just that people have lost interest in their dreams as much as:
1) it's more difficult than expected (or it can be more difficult than expected),
2) the rules change when you grow up, and there are plenty of them.
3) sometimes those dreams just aren't worth it, or they divert too much from society's "expectations". The one can get pretty lost.
But at the end it boils down to ones mentality and how he/she adapts to life. There are those who can adapt and those who can't, period. If chatGTP or AI can help out the latter, i might be amazed (since they are tools, one must know how to use them, or the results can be catastrophic).
creativity consists in my eyes of:
- the ability to identify, access and apply your known rules for manipulating a group of objects
- the ability to reckognize and learn distinct rules for manipulating a group of objects
- the ability to abstract and expand your known rules by treating your set of rules as a new group of objects on which your rules can be applied
a group of objects can be divided, merged, sorted, stacked, aligned ...
those rules can be expanded by calling a sorted stack, a sorted alignment and 2-weight-sorted group new rules to play with.
The abraction, their meta-rule was rule-addition. Other meta-rules could be rule-chaining or rule-reversing..
the more ideas, the more flexible the mind is. The more flexible the mind, the easier to be creative
Such a timely discussion! Love it!
Well, I think this is the perfect time to learn some technical or manual habilities like cookery, bakery, pastry, mechanic repair, plumber, carpinter, electrician etc Things that you can do with your hands.
I personally like cookery and pastry, but only wjen I have to cook pr bake for my family, haha ( not lazy)
교육자로써 앞으로 어떻게 교육을 할 것인지 생각해보게 하는군요 좋은 영상이었습니다
I am happy to be the commenter that points out that this is a problem with capitalism, not with AI. At some point we have to ask if it's really worth keeping these needlessly rich people in power, or if we should get rid of them and seize the means of production back for the people.
Wow, great perspectives. Opened my eyes to more than a few concepts I hadn't thought of, thank you.
WOW! I can only imagine how ChatGPT will help those who are Neurodivergent, Autistic, etc. learn because the current system is not meeting any of their needs. Exciting!
Really smart professor!, this is brilliant advice, the design thinking can be used for business obviously
Excellent guidance!!!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Thank you!
That is the tricky part. When children learning basic knowledge, it is also a process that they develop their way of thinking skills especially critical thinking skills. If children use AI in early stage, they might relay on it for its convenience and start to lose their own ability of deep thinking. That is my experience with chat gpt, when I ask some questions and it give me some answers that actually different from my beliefs or from my value. However children are in the stage they don’t have those strong opinions of their values and beliefs yet. So how to make sure young generations are not going to be brain washed by AI and their designers and loose critical thinking abilities?
This is what they want.
Great ideas and info
I’m learning about AI just by listening to videos and reading and actually trying to play with it
It's facinating to hear someone highly educated who can talk both "0 and 1" and "empathy". Logical and emotional at the same time.
Oh sure, AI movers and shakers are just brimming with empathy towards the untold millions or billions for which this technology will be a disaster.
@@flickwtchr That's not even the point . "Emphatize toward the situation and problem" to make correct "logical solution based on creativity", is what he's talking about. The fundamental "0 and 1", logic gate, and now Natural Language Processing, is just a further advancement of human and machine interaction, nothing more, nothing less. Emphaty is also just one of many ethical requirement of any kind of interaction, with it's own of right,and balance proportion.
I mean, it's the bare minimum when dealing with such an overpowering technology that can easily destroy humanity.
What are the guarantees that a man-made, everlasting, self learning, and lawless technology of which most of us know nothing about, except that it has most of our personal, financial, and even health data will not turn against us, due to a conclusion brought by by a purely logical algorithm?
For real, how do you program empathy onto a machine? Millennia of existence for humans still hasn't proven enough to give us biological beings a strong sense of empathy, enough to address important divisive issues in the world, and we're trusting that newly developed artificially intelligence machines will be able to program themselves towards empathy, with the data assembled from the chaos of human civilization up until now?
I find it extremely nerve wrecking to know that we're basically training AI in all our weaknesses as a civilization, yet know nothing about how to handle AI when it goes out of hand (which at this rate, is practically around the corner). We need to develop AI slower, and in a healthier way, and train every single person in the world to be a participant of AI construction, and not just a study subject for data compilation on masse.
I was literally just having this train of thoughts about ai and learning path and this video shows up. Crazy
Creativity cannot be taught in a classroom because those who seek answers are looking for hard definitions. To be creative is to be free from the standard rules and practices. By definition there is a finite amount of people that can be creative before a creative way of teaching becomes standard.
The best way to become creative is to question everything, disregard most hard and fast rules, and be willing to accept judgment. Just know that deviating from what most people consider normal comes at a cost.
I'd say StableDiffusion is pretty darn creative. At the moment, it looks like AI is doing badly on numbers and truthfulness, so ironically the "boring" STEM and handiwork jobs are going to be spared at first, unlike creative jobs.
@@wyqtor It won't. Its just polarize art.
I looked up non english based internet and all of them says the same thing.
Until you proven the robot can make their own Oriental style Artwork after Algorithmic Disgorgement reset, we are still buy Taiwanese, Japanese, Indian, Malayan, and Korean arts.
Also this snippet, "Art is more accessible you say, but you're going to take a deaf, mute, and impaired people's works too?"
Oh and not to mention Miyazaki's, "I seen my disabled neighbors struggling to greet or doing high five. To see this, I think it is an insult to life itself."
Can't wait next year where "Made by Humans!!!" becomes a marketing jargon by AI Tech Corporations. Definitely going to keep me sane.
He is not joking at all, really think about the possibilities, good and bad.
Everything he said is right, but what I find myself asking more these days is: will there be enough jobs for every human? Should we start thinking about ways to guarantee everyone a decent life? (I think we should've long ago, but with AI the matter is even more impending).
So long as we have finite resources in comparison to our wants/needs, there will always be jobs.
Look at the industrial revolution. 1 person could do the work of 50 but there are still plenty of jobs around.
Super good talk that I 100% agree with and did the same with my kids.
Start with empathy.
Bravo.
EO ♥️. I am from Nepal 🇳🇵.
I like this guy. I wish I could volunteer to help folks with vision like this.
This assumes that AI will remain narrow in the tasks it can perform. Once we AGI which many believe could happen within a decade then even our creativity won't be a huge advantage over AI
how so ? this just sounds like in security issues
@@jgalvan09 Maybe ChatGPT can help you envision possible issues.
This interview is what I exactly wanted to listen to.
Thank you for making and providing these fantastic videos
Incredible! Thank you for this interview.
The line in the sand is simple: if life for the majority becomes harder with AI, the majority needs to overthr0w the system. We should not let the wealth and power concentrate further into the hands of a smaller group.
In an oppressive system, yes. But in an open market, nobody is preventing access to these knowledge and tools. In an open market, you either spend your time improving or spend your time complaining and get left behind. Left behind not only by the "rich and powerful", but by your neighbours, your neighbouring cities and your neighbouring countries.
Oh yeah because wars always work out for the common people lol
what an amazing presentation. thank you so much. not ignore, grow with it.
I want to have a teacher like you!