This is awesome! Just having a open perspective on the present matters at hand can have an empowering affect. Thinking of new solutions to problems-- such as emissions and the impact it creates, that have intensified since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Change is difficult at first, uncomfortable and perhaps even rigid. But change... change in perspective, in a new invention, improved solution(s) and unique ideas provide us with a shift in outcome. It preserves are curiousity, motivation and most importantly our hope to keep moving forwards. To improve not as a province or country but as a whole planet.
A guy in a fancy studio with expensive lighting systems that gobble horrendous amounts of electricity while wearing designer clothing made from petroleum distillates, and who jets around the world in his role as an NGO Director attending pointless conferences with other overpaid paper-pushers like himself, has the gall to tell other people that they must reduce their consumption. Hypocrisy, thy name is Phil De Luna. "Rules for thee, but not for me."
He's the only one I saw that didn't include a whole audience of people so that saved some lighting and emissions. His shoes look worn as well, perhaps you should try to walk in them first before passing judgements.
@@mojorising1 You're wrong, and an apologist for the champagne socialists. I am a natural living and wild foraging expert. I grow or find 90% of my own food. I acquire my clothing 2nd hand, and wear it till it's threadbare. I will never own a personal use vehicle, as I'm an avid long distance bicyclist. I've never been on an airplane. In my spare time, I operate an informal charity that builds beautiful raised bed art garden for free. Some of us walk the walk. This guy just talks the talk, like he's doing here.
Wait, he was born in Windsor, Ont. must count for something! I'm a forest technician chick from Montreal! Left my career in '88 because no one cared to replant properly!
Of course, we can work together only with people with sincere people of good faith who understand the extent of the problem. Unfortunately, both sides don't.
The CO2 that you produce is so small and insignificant, that trees and other plant-based life will take care of it. The Idea of Netzero is not to stop all emissions of CO2, but rather to limit it to the point, that the amount of CO2 we emit, is not greater than the amount the plant-based life absorbs. There are also a couple of other ways we can absorb CO2 that we have emitted, but plant-based life is currently the best.
Fighting emissions is a matter of politics. Just like solving hunger (since we already produce more than enough food to feed everyone) and other problems that "we" overcomplicate. Follow the money and you will find the culprit. Until companies are allowed to rule politics by lobbying, lack of transparency, corruption, nothing will change for better, only get worst.
How do you honestly expect anyone to travel sustainably when entire countries are built for car travel alone? Where I live, there is no public transportation and everything is too far to be reached on foot or bike.
The low spending percentage compared to what you earn is your wealth indicator. Try to reduce this percentage by 1% every month, first by spending less, secondly by earning more ;) keep in mind they aren't worth a hill of beans until you act on them ♥
The eviction MORATORIUM crowd should all get voted out. They forced private citizens to pay rents for total strangers for 2 long years while they had to pay theirs also. The pains, the headaches that landlords have been going through are unfair. They did that just on the name of a mysterious disease that everyone had to go through.
Crying for the hipocresy of someone who speak how u have to live meanwhile he is dress with 5000€ cloth and is filmed with a lot of lights consuming a lot of resources or is just joy? Beacuse i only see a fasciixx doing fasciixx things
I’m all for reducing pollution and keep the environment clean - we have to life in it so makes sense. But saying that we don’t need to worry about any natural events (like drought, flooding, forest fire etc) if we just go CO2 neutral is naive… like nature does not have this events before industrialisation. Also completely ignore that thanks to cheep reliable energy (fossil fuels) a lot of the effects of nature can be mitigated, life expectancy is higher, less poverty… Unfortunately renewable sources have often a hidden cost which is not mentioned, eg. destruction of nature and toxic waste for production of batteries to store solar power… unlike CO2 (which is harmless at the levels we emoting it) some of the toxic waste can’t be removed… Unfortunately the proper pros and cons are often not shown…
Um what? We are definitely emitting enough co2 for it to not be harmless. Do you not know the primary driver of unnatural climate change is co2? Yes, climate change is a natural process. Naturally it takes millions of years for the climate to change. We have done millions of years worth of change in about 200 years.
Maby they should limit desil trucks to only military and fraight carriers thats all these personal disel trucks are polluting the campgrounds and all the metropolitian areas and when you have your window down going down the road its in your face especially when they kick it down they should be required to have stacks just like the commercial carriers have! This is unhealthy to all drivers!
We could also make a good example for them by doing it first and showing them the economic benefits to going green. Yes, they'll be hard to convince but if nobody does then nothing will happen
The per capita carbon emission of USA is more than twice as much as China and that's only if you don't count the amount of carbon the US emitted before China and India and the other developing countries started industrialization. GET EDUCATED TROLL. We can't start with China and India we need everyone.
@@klydewithak9456 I guess you haven't been paying much attention! The US has been doing this For Years! Even US companies have offered China Scrubbers (the cleaning filters for cleaning the pollutants. By the way, the US (dispite MEDIA LIES) burns Coal CLEAER THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY) for Free! An if you look at Reality! The US has done More in the ECO than any other country! Most of the EU solved vehicle emissions problem by, JUST NOT HAVING ANY OR VERY FEW VEHICLES! THAT IS NOT SOLVING AN ISSUE,! That is called LIMITING THE PEOPLE'S FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT! CHINA DOES NOT CARE!
@@denysecoop7356 probably, we Are already in one. Some pple believe the pandemic is a biological war, and the effects and consequences are being and will Be like a normal one. The pandemic is the scenario for more profound systemic changes
I suppose he thinks that CO2 has a warming effect. Venus: 96.5% atmospheric CO2, average temp. 467 degrees C Mars: 95% atmospheric CO2, average temp. -63 degrees C (-157 at the poles) Still think CO2 has a warming effect?
Where is Mars relative to the sun, how much is in mars' atmosphere? These are both really important questions. You are correct, CO2 itself does not increase the temperature. Since Mars is both smaller (edit: and further away from the sun) it can't contain as much heat as, say, Venus. Additionally, when dealing with an expanding wave of energy steming from a point (the sun) is expentaly decreasing. For example, if one where to put Venus in the same orbital pattern as Mars one would observe that venus' average temperature would drastically drop similar to that of mars. However, since Venus has a larger surface area, has more carbon dioxide in volume (not proportion), and has a stronger gradational pull relativity more energy would be stored within the confides of the atmosphere. If this is to much let's put the planet a few light years from our sun: in this case the planet would be even colder than Mars as no sufficient source of energy would be applied to the planet. However if you take, let's take 2 Mars's. One of these Mars's instead of 95% CO2 it's 95% O2 (air) we would see that the rate in which the heat escapes the air Mars would be greater than that of the CO2 Mars. Inferences can be made from this: the more CO2 is in the air the more heat is contained rather than dispursed back into space which results in an increase of temperature.
@@cheebawobanu very informative and factual thank you for contributing your voice. However a rhyme does not make it true statement. I'm going green and you're mean!
might I add, even IF putting carbon dioxide into the air didn't increase the temperature natural gases are a limited resource and using so much of it instead of solar panels & and other renewable energy sources to replace them so that we can send more rocket into space later if and when we want to.
@@klydewithak9456 Earth has very little atmospheric CO2. We're going to be fine on this planet. NASA has commented more than once that it's the Sun from which we get most of the heat here.
If we really want clean air, we would convert every car to electric engine or propane engine in America. That money Biden just got for pet projects and free daycare should be used to help people afford a new engine. The engines have been around for years. We should invest developing a process making clean battery that help run electric engines. The problem with your speak it’s to pie in the sky focus.
Yes let's get rid of everything that is fun and live boring robot like lives. You still haven't proved that emissions are a problem. It's the sun that drives climate
He doesn't have to, that wasn't his point. But let me explain why carbon is an issue for him. Let's look at two other planets: Venus and Mars. Mars has an atmosphere comprised of 95% carbon and an average temp. Of -60°C and Venus with 96% of the atmosphere comprised of carbon with a daily temperature of 462°C. However as you pointed out the sun is the source providing the heat. So the % of carbon doesn't affect the amount of heat the planet receives. I'm really proud of you btw for getting to this point :). Okay, so, now let's take Venus and put it in an orbital flight as that of mars. We'd notice that the planets temperate would drastically drop similar to that of mars. However it wouldn't be the same. Here's why: let's say we make a copy of Venus, we'll name it Venus 2, and it has instead of 95% carbon, 95 O2. We place venus 1 & 2 light years away from any stars. They would both eventually reach roughly the same temperature. However we would notice that in Venus 1 that the temperature would more slowly decrease than Venus 2 (O2 Venus). If we then put a star next to the two we'd notice that venus 2 would release more heat than Venus and thus would be colder. Now, Earth's atmosphere is only comprised of a little bit of CO2. But since the more CO2 we have the less heat escapes it. This results in the planet gaining temperature. Although this doesn't directly affect humans it does affect a variety of ecosystems which humans use to harvest food, live on, ect,. and if anything goes wrong then it chains into other issues in other ecosystems and eventually back to us. Not to mention worse/weird climate disasters. Even IF we ignore all of this natural gases aren't renewable and we use so much of it on a daily basis, if we go green then we can latter use this fuel to do stuff that we normally cannot with electric machinery. Such as send rockets into space.
This is awesome! Just having a open perspective on the present matters at hand can have an empowering affect. Thinking of new solutions to problems-- such as emissions and the impact it creates, that have intensified since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Change is difficult at first, uncomfortable and perhaps even rigid. But change... change in perspective, in a new invention, improved solution(s) and unique ideas provide us with a shift in outcome. It preserves are curiousity, motivation and most importantly our hope to keep moving forwards. To improve not as a province or country but as a whole planet.
This was such a fantastic video! I love how he focused on the BIG picture. I try to have a similar style in my videos 🙂
Nah, we just need to fight eachother to zero emissions.
Not to sound cliché, but.. Team Work makes the Dream Work
A guy in a fancy studio with expensive lighting systems that gobble horrendous amounts of electricity while wearing designer clothing made from petroleum distillates, and who jets around the world in his role as an NGO Director attending pointless conferences with other overpaid paper-pushers like himself, has the gall to tell other people that they must reduce their consumption.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Phil De Luna. "Rules for thee, but not for me."
He's the only one I saw that didn't include a whole audience of people so that saved some lighting and emissions. His shoes look worn as well, perhaps you should try to walk in them first before passing judgements.
@@mojorising1 You're wrong, and an apologist for the champagne socialists.
I am a natural living and wild foraging expert. I grow or find 90% of my own food. I acquire my clothing 2nd hand, and wear it till it's threadbare. I will never own a personal use vehicle, as I'm an avid long distance bicyclist. I've never been on an airplane. In my spare time, I operate an informal charity that builds beautiful raised bed art garden for free.
Some of us walk the walk. This guy just talks the talk, like he's doing here.
0p
Wait, he was born in Windsor, Ont. must count for something! I'm a forest technician chick from Montreal! Left my career in '88 because no one cared to replant properly!
I've no car 🚗!
💯 THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. WE CANNOT FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE WITHOUT WORKING TOGETHER AS ☝️.
Of course, we can work together only with people with sincere people of good faith who understand the extent of the problem. Unfortunately, both sides don't.
Hope you can convince Russia - China - India to stop building Hydrocarbon based industries / power generation !! Good Luck !
⌚ at 04:::40 in the morning 👋
does exhaling CO2 count as a carbon emission? how do we get to net zero on those emissions? asking for a friend
Trees.
Lol that's the point, they want us normal people dead
The CO2 that you produce is so small and insignificant, that trees and other plant-based life will take care of it. The Idea of Netzero is not to stop all emissions of CO2, but rather to limit it to the point, that the amount of CO2 we emit, is not greater than the amount the plant-based life absorbs. There are also a couple of other ways we can absorb CO2 that we have emitted, but plant-based life is currently the best.
@@lusilver4304 you relise that the ocean and volcanic activity blows our little cars away right?
@@mblake0420 Have you even done a second of research?
Fighting emissions is a matter of politics. Just like solving hunger (since we already produce more than enough food to feed everyone) and other problems that "we" overcomplicate. Follow the money and you will find the culprit. Until companies are allowed to rule politics by lobbying, lack of transparency, corruption, nothing will change for better, only get worst.
Here is a thought...
How about all the corporations that made millions off of cutting down the world's trees plant them back.
That makes sense to me but unless there's a profit motive, that won't happen. People over profit.
India is the best at replanting.
That's not enough. How about they produce less emissions?
How else are they going to make room for the 100s of billions of farm animals we slaughter for food
@Ron Hastings Lol there is more trees than ever u moron
Nice talk
Ted needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress
The 1%: "Hold my beer..."
Very nice video , my friend
How’d you get to the TED talk? Horseback?
I has think the same thing about that. This People is so much hipocraty, these people can't see that they're as toxic as any other in this planet.
How do you honestly expect anyone to travel sustainably when entire countries are built for car travel alone? Where I live, there is no public transportation and everything is too far to be reached on foot or bike.
One day i am gonna tell my story there !
Best speeches and advices ❤
I hope 🙏
Future ~ Biomimicry ; ‘Natural Motion, does N🚫T require an e❌plosion’ •☂️
The world is one home. We May act as one people.
Ok commie
It is time to do in real time Best for climate!💑😍👍
The low spending percentage compared to what you earn is your wealth indicator.
Try to reduce this percentage by 1% every month, first by spending less, secondly by earning more ;)
keep in mind they aren't worth a hill of beans until you act on them ♥
More people more Co2 and less plants and biodiversity.
I remember Linus in Peanuts , "I love humanity, it is people I hate !"
As we all know, CO2 kills plants.
@@arkology_city I see what you did there. ;)
The eviction MORATORIUM crowd should all get voted out. They forced private citizens to pay rents for total strangers for 2 long years while they had to pay theirs also. The pains, the headaches that landlords have been going through are unfair. They did that just on the name of a mysterious disease that everyone had to go through.
i’m literally crying. what a speech.
Crying for the hipocresy of someone who speak how u have to live meanwhile he is dress with 5000€ cloth and is filmed with a lot of lights consuming a lot of resources or is just joy? Beacuse i only see a fasciixx doing fasciixx things
Exactly !!!🙌🙌🙌🙌
Sure 🤣
I’m all for reducing pollution and keep the environment clean - we have to life in it so makes sense.
But saying that we don’t need to worry about any natural events (like drought, flooding, forest fire etc) if we just go CO2 neutral is naive… like nature does not have this events before industrialisation.
Also completely ignore that thanks to cheep reliable energy (fossil fuels) a lot of the effects of nature can be mitigated, life expectancy is higher, less poverty…
Unfortunately renewable sources have often a hidden cost which is not mentioned, eg. destruction of nature and toxic waste for production of batteries to store solar power… unlike CO2 (which is harmless at the levels we emoting it) some of the toxic waste can’t be removed…
Unfortunately the proper pros and cons are often not shown…
Um what? We are definitely emitting enough co2 for it to not be harmless. Do you not know the primary driver of unnatural climate change is co2? Yes, climate change is a natural process. Naturally it takes millions of years for the climate to change. We have done millions of years worth of change in about 200 years.
Shoutout 🇵🇭
😃👍
This is absolutely trueee
🇺🇳6:02 😉
These are valuable thoughts.
Maby they should limit desil trucks to only military and fraight carriers thats all these personal disel trucks are polluting the campgrounds and all the metropolitian areas and when you have your window down going down the road its in your face especially when they kick it down they should be required to have stacks just like the commercial carriers have! This is unhealthy to all drivers!
Finally someone said it
영상감사합니다ㆍ솜결
I love this discussion👍
I suggest that you start with CHINA, INDIA SOUTH AND CENTRAL!
We could also make a good example for them by doing it first and showing them the economic benefits to going green. Yes, they'll be hard to convince but if nobody does then nothing will happen
The per capita carbon emission of USA is more than twice as much as China and that's only if you don't count the amount of carbon the US emitted before China and India and the other developing countries started industrialization.
GET EDUCATED TROLL. We can't start with China and India we need everyone.
@@klydewithak9456 I guess you haven't been paying much attention!
The US has been doing this For Years!
Even US companies have offered China Scrubbers (the cleaning filters for cleaning the pollutants. By the way, the US (dispite MEDIA LIES) burns Coal CLEAER THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY) for Free! An if you look at Reality! The US has done More in the ECO than any other country! Most of the EU solved vehicle emissions problem by, JUST NOT HAVING ANY OR VERY FEW VEHICLES! THAT IS NOT SOLVING AN ISSUE,! That is called LIMITING THE PEOPLE'S FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT!
CHINA DOES NOT CARE!
après la guerre il y aura moins de monde , nous n'auront même plus à nous soucier des émissions de Co2
After what war?
@@denysecoop7356 the one coming, ww3
@@denysecoop7356 probably, we Are already in one. Some pple believe the pandemic is a biological war, and the effects and consequences are being and will Be like a normal one. The pandemic is the scenario for more profound systemic changes
Like 🌹 🌟🌲🌲🌵🌹
World is my home, we are all one
I suppose he thinks that CO2 has a warming effect.
Venus: 96.5% atmospheric CO2, average temp. 467 degrees C
Mars: 95% atmospheric CO2, average temp. -63 degrees C (-157 at the poles)
Still think CO2 has a warming effect?
Where is Mars relative to the sun, how much is in mars' atmosphere? These are both really important questions. You are correct, CO2 itself does not increase the temperature. Since Mars is both smaller (edit: and further away from the sun) it can't contain as much heat as, say, Venus. Additionally, when dealing with an expanding wave of energy steming from a point (the sun) is expentaly decreasing. For example, if one where to put Venus in the same orbital pattern as Mars one would observe that venus' average temperature would drastically drop similar to that of mars. However, since Venus has a larger surface area, has more carbon dioxide in volume (not proportion), and has a stronger gradational pull relativity more energy would be stored within the confides of the atmosphere. If this is to much let's put the planet a few light years from our sun: in this case the planet would be even colder than Mars as no sufficient source of energy would be applied to the planet. However if you take, let's take 2 Mars's. One of these Mars's instead of 95% CO2 it's 95% O2 (air) we would see that the rate in which the heat escapes the air Mars would be greater than that of the CO2 Mars. Inferences can be made from this: the more CO2 is in the air the more heat is contained rather than dispursed back into space which results in an increase of temperature.
Don't buy The Carbon Lie!
@@cheebawobanu very informative and factual thank you for contributing your voice. However a rhyme does not make it true statement. I'm going green and you're mean!
might I add, even IF putting carbon dioxide into the air didn't increase the temperature natural gases are a limited resource and using so much of it instead of solar panels & and other renewable energy sources to replace them so that we can send more rocket into space later if and when we want to.
@@klydewithak9456 Earth has very little atmospheric CO2. We're going to be fine on this planet. NASA has commented more than once that it's the Sun from which we get most of the heat here.
People don’t want to give up eating animals.
That is correct.
Meat replacement is the next industry, turning men into women, just what Karens want.
Over my dead body
Tell me little german how u gonna stop the fight?
is that why you guys keep sabotaging oil refineries?
Well said.
If we really want clean air, we would convert every car to electric engine or propane engine in America. That money Biden just got for pet projects and free daycare should be used to help people afford a new engine. The engines have been around for years. We should invest developing a process making clean battery that help run electric engines. The problem with your speak it’s to pie in the sky focus.
on point
Go vegan.
Yes let's get rid of everything that is fun and live boring robot like lives. You still haven't proved that emissions are a problem. It's the sun that drives climate
This is how al gore made millions. How better to take on something that can't be proven either way
He doesn't have to, that wasn't his point. But let me explain why carbon is an issue for him. Let's look at two other planets: Venus and Mars. Mars has an atmosphere comprised of 95% carbon and an average temp. Of -60°C and Venus with 96% of the atmosphere comprised of carbon with a daily temperature of 462°C. However as you pointed out the sun is the source providing the heat. So the % of carbon doesn't affect the amount of heat the planet receives. I'm really proud of you btw for getting to this point :). Okay, so, now let's take Venus and put it in an orbital flight as that of mars. We'd notice that the planets temperate would drastically drop similar to that of mars. However it wouldn't be the same. Here's why: let's say we make a copy of Venus, we'll name it Venus 2, and it has instead of 95% carbon, 95 O2. We place venus 1 & 2 light years away from any stars. They would both eventually reach roughly the same temperature. However we would notice that in Venus 1 that the temperature would more slowly decrease than Venus 2 (O2 Venus). If we then put a star next to the two we'd notice that venus 2 would release more heat than Venus and thus would be colder. Now, Earth's atmosphere is only comprised of a little bit of CO2. But since the more CO2 we have the less heat escapes it. This results in the planet gaining temperature. Although this doesn't directly affect humans it does affect a variety of ecosystems which humans use to harvest food, live on, ect,. and if anything goes wrong then it chains into other issues in other ecosystems and eventually back to us. Not to mention worse/weird climate disasters. Even IF we ignore all of this natural gases aren't renewable and we use so much of it on a daily basis, if we go green then we can latter use this fuel to do stuff that we normally cannot with electric machinery. Such as send rockets into space.
Keşke türkçe alt yazı olsa :(
Turn on closed captions. Roughly accurate. Might help.
@@coconutwatersupreme maalesef türkçe altyazı yok
@@fairytale1445 oh sorry. Earlier your comment was translated here by google as wanting english subtitles. Misunderstanding. Sorry.
🗣?WHEN IT COMES TO CLIMATE CHANGE💬👤
First 🥇
1st 😬