Composite would be better in these scenario than GIC. But in molars, mostly the force is vertical compared to lateral. So the force will be transferred into the access cavity directly with minimal lateral forces. This patient is under my monitor and is fine (so far) Thank you
In case if the tooth requires ReRCT, removal of composite close to the orifices will be extremely difficult. Also usage of ultrasonics with GIC is better in case of reRCT
Sir , that means whenever biological width seems to be compromised, we should opt for endocrowns instead of regular post and core crown. Sir is this correct or wrong?
Thank you very much for the wonderful video sir. Very well explained sir. I have a doubt sir, in the clinical case that you showed us...what material has been used to build the walls sir...will rmgic be sturdy enough to act as walls/ferrule for the endocrown sir...or have you used some core build up material sir? Kindly advice sir. Thank you once again for making such amazing videos sir. You are an inspiration sir.
RMGIC is a reasonably strong material for this purpose. The retention of the endocrown is mostly from the pulp chamber. The walls just act as a supporting structure. Restorative Composite with etch and rinse bonding system will also be a good material. I personally do not recommend using commercial self bonding composite core buildup material as i doubt about the bond strength between the material and tooth.
Nice and informative video sir..well explained
Very neatly presented sir. Much needed video
Thank you
Thank you for the awesome presentation. Please keep doing more!
Thank you. I will do more.
Sir u have said that circumferintially u have built it up with gic... How will that withstand the force of a molar teeth?
Where in the video he says that....
Composite would be better in these scenario than GIC. But in molars, mostly the force is vertical compared to lateral. So the force will be transferred into the access cavity directly with minimal lateral forces. This patient is under my monitor and is fine (so far)
Thank you
thanks for such a knowledgeable video 👍
So nice of you
Why we don't use composite to fill on the floor
In case if the tooth requires ReRCT, removal of composite close to the orifices will be extremely difficult. Also usage of ultrasonics with GIC is better in case of reRCT
Sir , that means whenever biological width seems to be compromised, we should opt for endocrowns instead of regular post and core crown. Sir is this correct or wrong?
Pfm endocrown with butt joint can given only occlusion reduction 2mm and gic used for luting sir in endontic treated molar sir
Yes. We can give. But make sure to design the margin of the preparation in such a way so that chipping of ceramic can be prevented
Hello sir,
Kindly guide on how to temporise in these cases.
A temporary crown with composite after placing a small cotton pellet in the access cavity will be adequate.
Thank u sir. Ur video is very informative.
Thank you very much for the wonderful video sir. Very well explained sir.
I have a doubt sir, in the clinical case that you showed us...what material has been used to build the walls sir...will rmgic be sturdy enough to act as walls/ferrule for the endocrown sir...or have you used some core build up material sir? Kindly advice sir.
Thank you once again for making such amazing videos sir. You are an inspiration sir.
RMGIC is a reasonably strong material for this purpose. The retention of the endocrown is mostly from the pulp chamber. The walls just act as a supporting structure. Restorative Composite with etch and rinse bonding system will also be a good material. I personally do not recommend using commercial self bonding composite core buildup material as i doubt about the bond strength between the material and tooth.
I will try dear
Sure 😊
Sir please do video on class 2 cavity preparation
I will do soon. Also subscribe to my students channel...
ruclips.net/channel/UC__HRBnVTnC0ELSkx88gzrg
💐💐💐🙏
『p』『r』『o』『m』『o』『s』『m』 🎶