From John Macarthur For some strange reason people have accused me of denying the blood of Christ, which is not so. I affirm that a literal Jesus Christ who was man in every respect, one hundred percent man yet God incarnate, died on the cross, shed His literal blood as a sacrifice for sin. And I believe that, and I believe that it was that sacrificial death of Christ on the cross that atoned for the sins of man, and those who believe appropriate that atonement and receive eternal life through His death and resurrection, and that's historic Christian theology.
@@Sherlock245 You speak for John MacArthur? I watched the video and am not happy with the way he addressed this subject. He should have said, "Jesus had to die, not just spill a little blood. It was His death on the cross that gave His split blood the power to cleanse us from all sin." Had he said that, there wouldn't have been an issue. Sometimes our words fail us, but God never fails us and His words are Spirit and Life. John 6:63
@@Cmedic57 no words are from double doctrate. Your happiness is not truth and you are too obey Gods Word and no one better then double doctrate pastor has explain it well.
@@Sherlock245 Not sure what you mean by "Your happiness is not truth", and find it rude and very judgmental. All I said was that the way it was presented I was not happy with because I could not agree with what he said as it seemed he misconstrued the truth he was trying to express. Found it confusing, and your reply has only confused me even more, so no help there. Sorry for bothering you, was a waste of time. Will not bother you again sir. P.S. I like MacArthur and follow him, but don't agree with everything he says. He is only a man, and man is not perfect, only God is. We are only supposed to put our trust in God alone, and test every spirit.
" through His blood" is omitted in many Modern Translations. Check MacArthur's translation, the Legacy Standard Bible, most likely, it's omitted there too,I dint have one,so I can't say for sure.
The very 1st time John MacArthur says this statement originally was in 1976, and this was the 2nd time, He is blasphemous, about the Precious Blood of Jesus our Passover Lamb, because the life is in the Blood. Look up also, where He says you can take the mark of the beast and be forgiven....WHAT? John is definitely a wolf in Sheep's clothing, and majority of people like him, and also He gives summer camp meetings to youth groups ( I am sorry I forget the name of these Irish witches, but that is what is is giving at these summer events to youth.........He is so not saved!!! P.S. He also brags about his grandfather, and his father being Mason's ( this is so satanic )
So how were Jewish people saved before Jesus came? They were saved by repentance. We still have to do our part. Repent and sin no more. Jesus dying confirms OUR repentance.
7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin. You removedthe condition. If you walk in the light. Why would you try to hide that part of the verse?
@@dansimpson271 goodness, it wasn't intentional, I was remembering that the blood of Jesus purifies us from sin, and truly thank you for posting the whole verse, the day I posted was because I was focused on what was being said in the message. Is that a condition for Jesus blood to purify us or is that a result? of walking in the light, confessing your sin, being in fellowship with the Lord? it's amazing if you think about it. the idea that He loved us before we knew Him, gave himself up for us as a sacrifice, tasted death, defeated death, all before we ever knew Him. and that He allows us to find Him and know Him, if we are truly seeking, not just about Him, but Him, so yes, walk in the light with the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of glory!
@@myrrhmadelove Thanks for the reply, it’s evident that you are wise and really seem to have the fruit of the spirit. John does say if we walk in the light. I Would say yes that is a condition. Yes it is amazing that he loved all mankind and died before any of us thought about living for him, and amen to all the rest of what you said! God provides a way! Praise be to God the father and our king Jesus!
@@kingdomambassador1904 GO BACK TO BIBLE .. THE BLOOD IS FOR FORGIVENESS OF SINS .. JESUS SAID MY BLOOD IS SHED FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS ... WE HAVE REDEMPTION BECAUSE OF THE BLOOD FOR SINS
“Would you be free from your burden of sin? There’s power in the blood, power in the blood. Would you or evil a victory win, there’s wonderful power in the blood”🎼
Leviticus 17:11 " For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that make the atonement for the soul." Old testament but true today in the Age of grace. Hebrews 9:12 " Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." Kjv Praise the Lord Jesus Christ!!! Thank you Jesus!
We are Saved by Jesus Christ's finished Work on The cross His Powerful Innocent Precious Blood was shed for all our sins past present future His death burial Resurrection paid for all our sins. At that very moment that we believe in Jesus Christ alone for Salvation we are saved and sealed with The Holy Spirit until the day of redemption. Having life forever/ eternal life/ everlasting life. Praise GOD Amen Hallelujah.❤🙏
Hey, look, it's brother Tom. I agree. Many seem to forget we are all the body of Christ, that we love Him, and He loves us all even more. He doesn't want us to fight.
@gregmiell3037 And your sins would not be able to be forgiven unless THE BLOOD of Jesus was spilled. For there are no Levitical priests to sacrifice your lamb, goat, or bullock to forgive sins. The blood of Jesus swallowed death in victory.
His blood cursed that entire nation, and the land for two thousand years and counting. The curse will only be washed away with the river of blood from His enemies, neck deep, and two hundred miles long.
This Pastor Jesse guy TOTALLY GETS IT. I so enjoy hearing him speak on topics of Faith an Life. Obviously Legit Born Again and super edifying. I really enjoy his work.
@@MikeOzmun I read my My Bible as it is written, and it is written in Acts 20:28 that Christ has purchased me with HIS OWN BLOOD. Judas MacArthur is a false teacher.. All of us who believe on the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross are aware of his false gospel. Open your eyes and study more so you won't be deceived.
JM has many Augustine-Calvin influenced issues. I don't know what breaks my heart more...his Calvinistic-Lordship Salvationist theology or those that can't see thru it & nearly idolize him, believing him to be America's darling of Pastors???
I believe only unsaved people will WILLINGLY receive The Mark of The Beast. Saved believers at that time will be distinguished by the fact that they refused to receive it.
@johntrevett2944 😮 why yes, you're pledging allengce to satan himself by taking the mark, saved or not.! Thankfully saved people won't have to face the mark though.! Only the one's left here during the tribulations will have the choice of taking the mark.
Imagine a world where the the common man had no access to the word of God, it'd be medieval, or rather evil, thank God we can access his word for ourselves 🙏
The shedding of blood is not just dying. It is a brutal death. It is the destruction of life, murder, slaughter. This is how He had to die. Not by accident or through disease. It is an intentional taking of life and He intentionally laid down his life for us. This stuns me.
21 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22 in the body of His flesh through DEATH, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight. Its pack and parcel. The blood that is shed that led to His death is one and the same. If Jesus was to slice his hand so He bleeds out but not die, it would not be sufficient, it is His death that completes the sacrifice. So John MacArthur is correct. It is the same with any sacrificial animal, they did not cut it only for the blood to be on the Altar and for the animal to later be set free, but that animal had to die for the sacrifice to be complete. And even then it was only a cover, it didn't take the sin away.
@@4truthistrue434 John Mac Arthur may have a point, but he takes it too far. Nobody would argue that merely cutting a goat on his ear and sprinkling its blood on the altar counts as an animal sacrifice. It is about death and the shedding of blood, don't downplay either one, that is how to be consistent with the whole Bible.
@@Alrich-uo4rc That is true, but the notion of this video as well as a lot of the comments here, seem to separate the two, placing emphasis on the blood while disdaining his death, when it is His death that officiates the sacrifice, making his blood significant.
Good video. I so agree. Jesus's blood was divine blood ( born of a virgin ) in order to save us ( and His plan ). He also had to be sinless and was. He was the perfect and ONLY possible sacrifice for our salvation.
Isaiah 53:5 King James Version 5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
J Mac is getting further and further from scripture the older he gets A whole new generation coming along is going to battle this stuff again and again I remember posting a comment on his statement to this and it being removed a few times Folks unless they are willing to take a honest look at the text over what some man says they will never see the truth
What about Luke 22:20 In the same way he also took the cup after supper and said, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you."
21 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22 in the body of His flesh through DEATH, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight. Its pack and parcel. The blood that is shed that led to His death is one and the same. If Jesus was to slice his hand so He bleeds out but not die, it would not be sufficient, it is His death that completes the sacrifice. So John MacArthur is correct. It is the same with any sacrificial animal, they did not cut it only for the blood to be on the Altar and for the animal to later be set free, but that animal had to die for the sacrifice to be complete. And even then it was only a cover, it didn't take the sin away.
I think John MacArthur is trying to explain it in a way where it’s kind of confusing because scripturally it is the blood of Christ that cleanses us from all sin. Yes, he was bleeding, but he was going to die and that’s all part of it. That’s why we take the cupand the bread and remembrance of him until he comes
its actually both Megical doesnt mean spells necesarilly it means that which influences the world through supernatural or unknown forces thus christs blood being divine in nature was thus magical and it was Holy because of the infusion of the Holy Spirit mixed with divine creation
John Calvin’s “Institutes of the Christian Religion is full of explanations of the necessity of the blood being shed to purchase us, and save us from Gods wrath, and that both were needed to obtain full redemption.
There was absolutely something special about the blood of Jesus; otherwise any person’s blood could have been used. Remember he was perfect, without spot or blemish. His blood alone was worthy and pure.
Yeah, no. It wasn't his blood that was special. No one else could've done what Jesus did because he was (1) the Son of God and (2) the only person in the entirety of history who never sinned.
OK, I was going to throw out a few scriptures but you beat me to it. That's what I get for trying to comment before the video is finished. In fact, you blew MacArthur out of the water on this one. When he says "His blood doesn't save" it just about makes me hurl my lunch. Thanks for taking this man to task Pastor Jesse!
The sacrificial animals all bled to death, Jesus did not bleed to death, he suffered the death of his spirit (my God, my God , why have you forsaken me?) and then said "it is finished" then he willfully pushed his head forward and gave up his spirit.
@@4truthistrue434 Exposing false teachers is NOT slander! Jesus himself exposed all false teachers in Matthew chapter 7. We are called as believers to expose all false teachers who teach another gospel other that the one that Paul preached. Please study The Book of Galatians because that is what that book is all about. If someone who has never heard the true gospel of grace hears the false message that John MacArthur propergates, that person will not be saved and will go on believing that they are saved. We are in the end times and Satan is working overtime because he know his time is near. Please, know God's Word and stop accusing me of doing something bad when I am doing what scripture teaches! God bless!
@4truthistrue434 I hear ya, but there are countless videos of him doing the very thing you are saying. All the panels he's been associated with just straight up judging an entire generation.. Constantly judging.
Please subscribe, like and share this video if it helped you! We do pray for JMac in two ways: If he is not saved, then that he would trust in Christ. If he is saved, then that he would get cleared up of the muddy doctrines. Thanks! - Trent
"And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the bason, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the bason; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning." (Exodus 12:22) The blood of the passover lamb saved the Israelites from the destroying angel.
Blood is the only thing that covers our sins. So the blood does save us all. Jesus Christ blood that is not mine. Mine blood couldn’t save a flea on its best day.
Levititcus 17:11 "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." The new testament verses in Hebrews show the fulfilment of this verse at the cross. The blood is what was taken from the sacrifice and sprinkled on the arc of the covenant by the high priest. It was not to be a death of strangulation or with a broken bone, it was very specific.
None of you seem to be able to exegete from the original to get it correct but insist on taking all of it out of context. Oh well the apostacy of the roman church is well rooted! That cup of wine magically turns to blood.
I use to listen to and read books from John MacArthur up until 2000. He said the same thing on the radio back then, not only does MacArthur deny the shedding of the blood but MacArthur also believes that not only Christ had to die physically but Christ also had to die spiritually. Another thing is MacArthur says things real vague, so you can take what he is saying several different ways. Also, there are no Protestant Reformers who taught this heresy.
I agree with MacArthur on the necessity of the suffering and death of Jesus Christ. I disagree with MacArthur on the value of the literal blood of Jesus. Without the suffering and deaths of the savior the blood alone would be of doubtful value. We need both in the atonement.
@@galewollenberg786 You should examine that verse in context an understand what it really is saying. Usually "touch not the anointed" is used. Pastors are not beyond reproach. Paul would have never corrected Peter if they are not to be judged.
@@galewollenberg786 Peter was an apostle also. An apostle can correct another apostle, just as one christian can correct another. These pastors that preach bad doctrine are not above reproach from others. That is the analogy I was giving, which you missed.
Blood represents a figurative cleansing (washing), from a perfect or unspotted sacrifice. But animal sacrifices point to the human sacrifice of Christ, because it had to be a sinless human to take away sins from the rest of sinful humanity. Christ shed His literal blood and we receive the benefits - forgiveness of sins. We are not literally being washed by His literal blood, but due to the literal shedding of His blood, we receive the benefits upon accessing His grace through faith.
Without the resurrection we are still in our sin... 1Corinthians 15:12-17. Yes, Jesus is the unblemished Lamb of God. His blood most certainly was unstained; perfect. So it made the perfect sacrifice for sin, but His resurrection gives us Everlasting Life.
well, yes but we can't take away an essential puzzle from the whole beautiful mysterious picture by our Lord Jesus Christ. His Blood cleaned us and it is also the Scripture, and then comes everlasting life... not without blood. So the words of John went far over the red line
I'm glad you addressed this. I've heard about it but never looked into it. Thank you for doing reaction videos. I like how you deal with scripture alone and don't resort to personal attacks like so many others do. ❤
Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sin. Christ had to die to shed His innocent blood to save us sinners. John 3:18. John is clearly an UNBELIEVER. He preaches a perverted message of works salvation. Not the free gift by a one time faith alone apart from any works for the Gift of God. Romans 6:23. John 3:16. Faith alone. John 6:47. God said. First John 5:13. The gospel. First Corinthians 15:1-4. Romans 1:16. Galatians 1:6-9. Anyone who preaches any other gospel, LET THEM BE ACCURSED. And Paul said it twice. In his book, "Hard to be saved", He says this. It is not the words we speak but the life "we" live that determines our eternal destiny. HOG WASH. It is the sinless life that Jesus lived that determines our eternal destiny. Romans 3:26-28. First John 1:8. John believes and preaches that Jesus died for nothing and we can save ourselves.
@@galewollenberg786 I can tell false teachers, Matthew 7:15, wolves in sheep's clothing that are preaching another gospel. Not First Corinthians 15;1-4. Romans 1:16. Galatians 1:6-9. Though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you, than we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we said before, so say I again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received of us, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. John plainly preaches a works based salvation. Romans 11:6. Romans 4:5-8. Romans 3:26-28. I do not know whether He is saved or not. But what He preaches leads people to believe a false idea. That we can save our selves and Jesus died for nothing. Galatians 2:21. I do not void the grace of God, for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ died for nothing. What a horrible thing to say. Jesus gave His life a ransom to save us. John 6:47. John 10:28-29. John 3:18. First John 5:13. These things have I written unto you that BELEVE on the name of the Son of God, that ye may KNOW YE HAVE ETERNAL LIFE. Romans 6:23. For the penalty for sin is death, but, (the good news) THE GIFT OF GOD IS ETERNAL LIFE. No one can earn it. When we add anything to the gospel of grace, we pervert the gospel and make it by man works. Not Gods work. John 6:40 and John 6:29. Matthew 7:21-23. Romans 8:9. Without the Spirit there is no salvation. With the Spirit we have eternal life. Ephesians 1:13-14. Ephesians 4:30. Acts 16:31. John 3:18
Your reaction to this one was great! I could hear the John M video myself and knew there was something wrong but i needed you to make it seem so simple to understand how he twisted it. Shame on John M. He is too educated to make these mistakes by accident. He is a deceiver. Bless you Pastor Jesse as always.
Wow, you are right. I have come in contact with many people who love to attribute their doctrine more so to church history rather than to scripture in its context.
I loved your response. God shed _his own blood_ to purchase the church. Acts 20:28 "Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God _which He purchased with His own blood."_
If you’ve read the Bible all the way through…..BLOOD Is prettttttttty significant. From The Blood of Abel which cried out from the earth to The Lord….. all the way to The Cross of Christ Jesus our Lord’s precious Blood.
Thank you pastor Jesse because he was one of the few I'd listen to but something never seemed right about his teachings and you brought it out through the scriptures thank you and may God continue to bless you and your family.
"The innocent blood of Messiah unto death is the cost exacted by lawlessness," Gregg. The shedding of blood means killing someone. If someone says you have blood on your hands, it means you are responsible for their death not that you have the actual blood on your hands. So it's an equivalency. I think this is where McArthur is coming from.
Except that’s not what the Bible teaches in the subject. The Bible teaches were are cleansed, washed and literally saved by the blood of Christ. The Bible teaches that Christ’s blood is MIRACULOUS and that there is power in His blood. John MacArthur is preaching pure heresy here. Open your ears.
cleansed by the blood of Messiah which resulted in His death. Without the death there would be no cleansing or salvation. The shedding of the blood was the means to the death (and the conquering f death) that saves us. Sometimes there's more to the story. But of course you are free to see it how you see it I'm not trying to argue with anyone, just stating what I "see".
Leviticus 17:11 (NIV):"For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one's life."
He is calling out the behavior of alot believers today who misuse the "blood" like/ as if you pray over arsenic you won't die when you drink it!! Don't miss the lesson...Don't be disrespectful to the Blood, treating it like some ABRACADABRA thing.
lol, what? That’s not what he was saying. Go back and listen again. He is saying we are not saved by Christs blood, because in truth, John doesn’t understand the gospel.
John McArthur is not wrong.. Christ physical blood is always in reference to his death. It was Christ shedding his blood. Stop reading into the scripture. Stop saying what the scripture does not say. There is no case against what John McArthur is saying. He says it exactly right.
Revelation 12:11 They overcame him, by the word of their testimony and the BLOOD 🩸 of the Lamb. 1 John 5:7-8 And there are three that bear witness on each: the Spirit, the Water and the BLOOD. Revelation 1:5 Unto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood, hath made us kings and priests unto God, and his Father.❤
Without the shedding of blood there is no remission ( of sins ) Hebrews 9:22 I think of the blood painted on the doorposts by the Israelites who by doing so were passed over a foreshadowing of what was to come There are s many scriptures that point to the shedding of his blood and yes, Jesus paid our wage of sin which was death but the life was in his blood , his perfect sacrifice that superseded the temporary payment of the blood of animals because he was 💯 holy.
It is Jesus who saves. That is why He is called the Savior. Cleansing of His blood for our sin is one of the consequences of believing in and on Jesus as God and Savior for everlasting life. Other consequences are: we become new creatures in Christ, God becomes our Father, we become God's children, we receive the gift of everlasting life, all sins are forgiven, we receive Jesus' Righteousness, and we receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Revelation 1:5 And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
Brother, you said it so perfectly. The shedding of blood is what causes the death, and Jesus was the final sacrifice. I'm not trying to get into a Calvinist discussion, but it has been rearing it's ugly head where I am. When I try to point them to verses like 1 John 2:2 when they say that Jesus didn't die for the world (also see John 3:16, and Revelation 3 "Behold...I stand at the door and knock, if ANYONE hears my voice"). I have read through the New Testament, and I cannot understand how people get stuck on and elevate the writings of Paul as supreme to everything else. I recently felt led to read each book written by the Apostle John - The one whom Jesus loved (Gospel of John, 1-3 John, and The Revelation of Jesus Christ). In 1st John, it tells us exactly how to live as Christians. We are to believe in the command of the Father, which is to love the one He sent (i.e. Jesus Christ), and Jesus Christ's command for us is to love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself. We are to be feeding, clothing, equipping the poor and less fortunate, as well as the orphans and widows. We are to be helping everyone, not building larger church buildings, but I digress. The thing I've noticed lately is that so many established Christian churches and their pastors are falling into error. They seem to want to cause controversy, enrich themselves, and beat their chests to say "I'm right, you're wrong" and to confuse the masses as the profound simplicity of belief/faith in Jesus Christ's finished work (1 Cor. 15:1-4, John 3, Romans 10, 1 John). The arguments these pastors, and pastor, I'm not saying this to you, are divisive, and the love of Christ is not in them. I cannot fathom how a pastor could not say that the blood of Jesus has nothing to do with salvation. The legalism some portray is mindblowing.
If Jesus was under so much stress in Gethsemane He literally sweat blood because of the task set before Him praying fervently like no other prayer ever offered up to God "If it be thy will let this cup pass from Me, nevertheless not My will but Thine be done. DO you for one moment believe there was another way for Jesus Christ to buy us back? Yet if the spilling of blood without the intense suffering for our sins and death were the issue then James Harrison ruclips.net/video/DIJ8H202QFw/видео.html is the world record blood donor @ ~ 495 gallons of blood and he really did not suffer in any real painful manner to donate all that blood. If the spilling of blood alone was the issue then Jesus could have simply filled up bottles and bottles of His blood over time then spilled it on the ground. However then exactly what meaning would that have? The blood on the doorposts in the Exodus was evidence that an animal was slain for the firstborn and it stopped dead the destroyer from coming in. Yet without the sacrifice and pain of death what good would the blood be though it would be the blood of God incarnated into a sinless human. The suffering was the propitiation and the expiation without which I really do not believe the blood had that much meaning.
sinless blood is what made this sacrifice perfect and the LAST payment (not just a covering) for sin. I did not know John Mac said this. Never saw this before. This is a big deal.
Pastor Jesse, Thank you so much for bringing to our attention. Let us see, what the scripture has to say. This is so important to rightly divide the word of truth. I always felt that Paul was very protective over the message of the Cross, like when when he said in 1 cor. 1:18 he did not want to confuse the importance of the blood, with any other Religious activity. Thank you!
The Death of Christ is what makes His Blood significant. Innocent blood is deemed Innocent because that innocent soul died. if that soul did not die it would just be deemed as blood.
I think maybe all of us people that are in the chat should pray for John MacArthur because if you can reference Jesus's blood as equivalent with other bodily fluids that he didn't want to get too graphic with... That's very scary. I'm going to pray for him and I would really appreciate any brothers and sisters in the Lord joining me with this Ty to those who do. This man really needs to see the truth
I stopped listening to this guy decades ago. What Bible is he reading? "God presented Him as the atoning sacrifice through faith in His blood" I'm a student of the Word and I know this. As an aside, I know the pain of dying from loss of blood. I had internal bleeding, and three or four doctors gave up on me and told my brothers to prepare a funeral for me. I was dead without the transfusions and it was painful. I often think of this and wonder how much pain Christ endured before and on that cross. Thank God!
In inserting the word magic into his talk, he seemed to be equating the blood of Jesus Christ with witchcraft in a subtle or maybe not-so-subtle. Manner, this is absolute blasphemy
It's explicitly stated in this verse. Redeemed.. with the precious blood of Christ. I Peter 1:18-19 NKJV [18] knowing that you were not 👉redeemed👈 with corruptible things, like silver or gold, from your aimless conduct received by tradition from your fathers, [19] but with 👉the precious blood of Christ,👈 as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.
Colossians 1:20 “Having made peace through the blood of His cross…”. This peace that Christ made through His blood is the satisfaction of God’s eschatological wrath. The first words Jesus spoke when he appeared to His disciples in their midsts, after His resurrection, was “Peace be unto you”. This was Him comforting the disciples and anyone who places their faith in Him, that they are no longer enemies of God. And this only comes by the blood He shed.
The blood and water and the spirit testify. Ron Wyatt saw the blood of Christ that came down from His crucifixion that anointed the ark of the covenant to seal all who believe in Him upon the mercy seat of God.
We are save Forever by faith Alone in Crist Alone trusting in his perfect blood shed on the cross to forgive our sins past presente and future..we are save by his precious blood.
WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT? It took the blood of Jesus to purchase our salvation! Am I hearing this correctly? This is what is causing division among Christians. So he denies Revelation 1:5? Here it is: "And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and WASHED US FROM OUR SINS IN HIS OWN BLOOD."
Man, Jesus couldn't go down to the local Stewart blood drive RV and make a blood donation!! Jesus had to pay the sacrifice with His Life!! Without the shedding of blood, means you give up your life! As a pastor, rightly dividing the Truth is one of your most important jobs! Keep at it! This a battle you might want to pass on!
There are plenty of reasons, but I’ll keep it practical. 1) 1 John regarding “practice sin” vs “commit sin.” KJV translates it as “commit, do.” 2) Romans 8:1. KJV includes the latter end of that verse. 3) John 7-8. KJV includes the end of John 7 and into John 8. 4) The accuracy is unparalleled concerning the Greek and Hebrew. The translators went the extra mile to make sure they did the best they can. It was a form of checks and balances. 5) There is no copyright change, nor is there a need for “making it easier to understand today.” 6) The texts the other translations are derived from (Alexandrian, Sainaticus and Vaticanus - I prob misspelled this) were oldest and well kept, but this is because they weren’t used. 7) Other figures such as Wescott and short have preferred the other texts (not the Majority text) so as to discredit their viability. 8) The KJV has stood the test of time. There’s more, but these are some shorthand points. - Trent
Innocent blood had to be shed in order for the guilty to be pardoned. The only Person that could pay for our sins by shedding His blood is our Lord Jesus Christ❤❤❤
I would also like to say hello and thank you to all my brothers and sisters in Christ in the comments section. It add so much wisdom and relevant verses of GOD's Word to the video.
The Bible simply teaches us that we are saved by the Grace of God. Because God chose us for a gift to the Son as His bride. So we are saved By God through faith in Jesus Christ.
Without blood there cannot have Salvation. Jesus shed his Holy Blood for all of our sins. He arose from the grave in total victory over death, the grave, and of course satan! Jesus Christ Reigns Forever!
He said there’s nothing magical( bad choice of word) in his saliva, blood ect. Did Jesus not spit in the mud and heal the blind man. He’s not wrong it’s not magical it was son of God Himself in the flesh.
I remember over 100 years ago the U.S currency used to be back by gold, for every dollar in use there was a certain amount of gold in weight, kept back in Banks. Regarding this, in the OT God told Moses to build Tabernacle according to the pattern he sees in Heaven. There is a lot of blood in the OT books(Deut, Lev, and Numbers). There is a Heavenly Temple with an altar. We know that sin is real, so is The Blood(Of Christ). In Rev 7:14, 12:11. I don't understand it all, I know that Our LORD still has wounds that haven't fully healed for our benefit.
I can't believe I fell for John MacArthur. I been deceived. I'm glad God help me open my eyes. John MacArthur is really a false teacher. Thank pastor Jesse for shedding light about this. I will never fall for these mega church pastors ever again. I'm glad I didn't go to Grace Community Church and other false churches. I feel blessed that the Lord protected me from harm. Amen praise the Lord hallelujah. God bless you Pastor Jesse Martinez. I'm glad I subscribed to your channel.😀😇🙌🙏👍🌞🌄🌈
Thank you, Pastor for dealing with this issue. This man has disturbed me for decades. How would the Israelites have been saved the night of the Passover if they just killed the lamb but didn’t apply the blood! If one studies the Levitical system, the blood was always being applied. The final and perfect application is Jesus’s precious blood.
JM opinion on the matter obviously got twisted. 1. He's right about the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ: it's not magical. Not a dna extra or less. It's not supernatural. Why? He's human. That's why. He had to be, if He's to assume the role of a Kinsman Redeemer! He's no kinsman if his blood isn't as ours. 2. What sets his human blood apart (again, not in the sense extra supernatural) is this: innocence. It is untainted by human sin. His blood is innocent enough to pay for the guilty. 3. Quoting "Without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness of sin" to mean the blood that trickles down is enough to save has failed to acknowledge the demand of the Law: death. Nowhere in the OT did the priests plug the wound of the animal since enough blood was shed - the animal is then released. No, the shedding drains the animals dry. "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man his blood will be shed; for in His own image God has made mankind." Gen 9:6 4. Life is in the blood. Indeed. So life for life.
Are you sure that you are going to heaven? Watch here:
ruclips.net/video/t_6L7E_mfIw/видео.html
Are you loving thy neighbour rather then thumping them with hell???
From John Macarthur
For some strange reason people have accused me of denying the blood of Christ, which is not so. I affirm that a literal Jesus Christ who was man in every respect, one hundred percent man yet God incarnate, died on the cross, shed His literal blood as a sacrifice for sin. And I believe that, and I believe that it was that sacrificial death of Christ on the cross that atoned for the sins of man, and those who believe appropriate that atonement and receive eternal life through His death and resurrection, and that's historic Christian theology.
@@Sherlock245 You speak for John MacArthur? I watched the video and am not happy with the way he addressed this subject. He should have said, "Jesus had to die, not just spill a little blood. It was His death on the cross that gave His split blood the power to cleanse us from all sin." Had he said that, there wouldn't have been an issue. Sometimes our words fail us, but God never fails us and His words are Spirit and Life. John 6:63
@@Cmedic57 no words are from double doctrate. Your happiness is not truth and you are too obey Gods Word and no one better then double doctrate pastor has explain it well.
@@Sherlock245 Not sure what you mean by "Your happiness is not truth", and find it rude and very judgmental. All I said was that the way it was presented I was not happy with because I could not agree with what he said as it seemed he misconstrued the truth he was trying to express. Found it confusing, and your reply has only confused me even more, so no help there. Sorry for bothering you, was a waste of time. Will not bother you again sir.
P.S. I like MacArthur and follow him, but don't agree with everything he says. He is only a man, and man is not perfect, only God is. We are only supposed to put our trust in God alone, and test every spirit.
"In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;"
Ephesians 1:7
" through His blood" is omitted in many Modern Translations. Check MacArthur's translation, the Legacy Standard Bible, most likely, it's omitted there too,I dint have one,so I can't say for sure.
AMEN PRAISE JESUS ❤️✝️❤️
@@Steve-og4ii KJV only i am.
Jesus Encounter Ministries RUclips channel=
The very 1st time John MacArthur says this statement originally was in 1976, and this was the 2nd time, He is blasphemous, about the Precious Blood of Jesus our Passover Lamb, because the life is in the Blood. Look up also, where He says you can take the mark of the beast and be forgiven....WHAT? John is definitely a wolf in Sheep's clothing, and majority of people like him, and also He gives summer camp meetings to youth groups ( I am sorry I forget the name of these Irish witches, but that is what is is giving at these summer events to youth.........He is so not saved!!! P.S. He also brags about his grandfather, and his father being Mason's ( this is so satanic )
Only through the blood of Jesus is the remission of Sin
I love this comment! Amen 🙏 ❤
So how were Jewish people saved before Jesus came? They were saved by repentance. We still have to do our part. Repent and sin no more. Jesus dying confirms OUR repentance.
@@mycharmedunicorn8715 there sins were covered because of the high priest preforming the sacrifice on behalf of Israel
1 John 1:7(b) "And the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin."
7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
You removedthe condition. If you walk in the light. Why would you try to hide that part of the verse?
@@dansimpson271 goodness, it wasn't intentional, I was remembering that the blood of Jesus purifies us from sin, and truly thank you for posting the whole verse, the day I posted was because I was focused on what was being said in the message. Is that a condition for Jesus blood to purify us or is that a result? of walking in the light, confessing your sin, being in fellowship with the Lord? it's amazing if you think about it. the idea that He loved us before we knew Him, gave himself up for us as a sacrifice, tasted death, defeated death, all before we ever knew Him. and that He allows us to find Him and know Him, if we are truly seeking, not just about Him, but Him, so yes, walk in the light with the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of glory!
@@myrrhmadelove Thanks for the reply, it’s evident that you are wise and really seem to have the fruit of the spirit. John does say if we walk in the light. I Would say yes that is a condition. Yes it is amazing that he loved all mankind and died before any of us thought about living for him, and amen to all the rest of what you said! God provides a way! Praise be to God the father and our king Jesus!
The BLOOD has LIFE. Only the BLOOD OF THE RIGHTHEOUS LAMB OF THE ALMIGHTY is the ONLY thing that can wash us of our sin.
Ron Wyatt … the blood of Christ showed the living blood of Christ
John 1 : 29 kjv sins
Christians Have Failed 2 Understand The blood
@@kingdomambassador1904 GO BACK TO BIBLE .. THE BLOOD IS FOR FORGIVENESS OF SINS .. JESUS SAID MY BLOOD IS SHED FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS ... WE HAVE REDEMPTION BECAUSE OF THE BLOOD FOR SINS
They just said that@@stevenrebelo1821
“Would you be free from your burden of sin? There’s power in the blood, power in the blood.
Would you or evil a victory win, there’s wonderful power in the blood”🎼
“Without the shedding of blood there is no remission “. ❤
The blood of animals were a foreshadowing of the SACRIFICIAL LAMB OF THE ALMIGHTY'S BLOOD.
Bingo!
Yes! How is this hard to understand? Even people who don't believe in Christ know this is the claim of the bible.
Leviticus 17:11 " For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that make the atonement for the soul." Old testament but true today in the Age of grace. Hebrews 9:12 " Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." Kjv Praise the Lord Jesus Christ!!! Thank you Jesus!
surely the b[ood of Jesus was unadultrated He was the pure lamb of God, pure in every way.
We are Saved by Jesus Christ's finished Work on The cross His Powerful Innocent Precious Blood was shed for all our sins past present future His death burial Resurrection paid for all our sins.
At that very moment that we believe in Jesus Christ alone for Salvation we are saved and sealed with The Holy Spirit until the day of redemption.
Having life forever/ eternal life/ everlasting life.
Praise GOD
Amen Hallelujah.❤🙏
Exactly.
I loved the way you handled this my brother. You spoke truth but you didn’t trash this Pastor which is the way many do it today. Good video. 🙏🏻❤️
Hey, look, it's brother Tom. I agree. Many seem to forget we are all the body of Christ, that we love Him, and He loves us all even more. He doesn't want us to fight.
Hey brother Tom!!!
If people touched Jesus's robe and got healed, imagine the blood of Christ...
Their faith was in Jesus, not His robe.
@gregmiell3037 And your sins would not be able to be forgiven unless THE BLOOD of Jesus was spilled. For there are no Levitical priests to sacrifice your lamb, goat, or bullock to forgive sins. The blood of Jesus swallowed death in victory.
His blood cursed that entire nation, and the land for two thousand years and counting. The curse will only be washed away with the river of blood from His enemies, neck deep, and two hundred miles long.
It was their faith, not touching Him. Easy to skirt the edge of idolatry.
"For she said within herself, If I may but touch his garment, I shall be whole." - Matthew 9:21.
This Pastor Jesse guy TOTALLY GETS IT. I so enjoy hearing him speak on topics of Faith an Life. Obviously Legit Born Again and super edifying. I really enjoy his work.
The church of God, which He hath purchased WITH HIS OWN BLOOD ( Acts20:28).
Thank you Pastors for exposing a false teacher under the church age.
Get this soul a cookie!!
So because you can only think in literal and not metaphorical, he's a false teacher. smh.
@@MikeOzmunThe Bible is literal.
@@MikeOzmun I read my My Bible as it is written, and it is written in Acts 20:28 that Christ has purchased me with HIS OWN BLOOD. Judas MacArthur is a false teacher.. All of us who believe on the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross are aware of his false gospel. Open your eyes and study more so you won't be deceived.
I bet he's done a lot more for the Kingdom than many others have. Context is always key. I wouldn't be too quick to judge.
JM has many Augustine-Calvin influenced issues. I don't know what breaks my heart more...his Calvinistic-Lordship Salvationist theology or those that can't see thru it & nearly idolize him, believing him to be America's darling of Pastors???
Facts!!!
John MacArthur has said many appauling things. Including you can take the mark of the beast and still be saved.
If John MacArthur said that, he's a total blasphemer and heretic.
So a saved person that takes the mark loses salvation?
@@johntrevett2944 The mark pledges allegience to the beast. They are not saved people. It's a clear choice during the tribulation. KJV Rev 14:9-11.
I believe only unsaved people will WILLINGLY receive The Mark of The Beast. Saved believers at that time will be distinguished by the fact that they refused to receive it.
@johntrevett2944 😮 why yes, you're pledging allengce to satan himself by taking the mark, saved or not.! Thankfully saved people won't have to face the mark though.! Only the one's left here during the tribulations will have the choice of taking the mark.
Imagine a world where the the common man had no access to the word of God, it'd be medieval, or rather evil, thank God we can access his word for ourselves 🙏
The shedding of blood is not just dying. It is a brutal death. It is the destruction of life, murder, slaughter. This is how He had to die. Not by accident or through disease. It is an intentional taking of life and He intentionally laid down his life for us. This stuns me.
Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins... except if you're smarter than the Bible like John MacArthur.
So people for thousands of years prior to Jesus’s coming were never forgiven?
@@mycharmedunicorn8715 Those who looked forward and trusted in the coming Messiah is forgiven.
21 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22 in the body of His flesh through DEATH, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight.
Its pack and parcel. The blood that is shed that led to His death is one and the same. If Jesus was to slice his hand so He bleeds out but not die, it would not be sufficient, it is His death that completes the sacrifice. So John MacArthur is correct. It is the same with any sacrificial animal, they did not cut it only for the blood to be on the Altar and for the animal to later be set free, but that animal had to die for the sacrifice to be complete. And even then it was only a cover, it didn't take the sin away.
@@4truthistrue434 John Mac Arthur may have a point, but he takes it too far.
Nobody would argue that merely cutting a goat on his ear and sprinkling its blood on the altar counts as an animal sacrifice.
It is about death and the shedding of blood, don't downplay either one, that is how to be consistent with the whole Bible.
@@Alrich-uo4rc That is true, but the notion of this video as well as a lot of the comments here, seem to separate the two, placing emphasis on the blood while disdaining his death, when it is His death that officiates the sacrifice, making his blood significant.
Good video. I so agree. Jesus's blood was divine blood ( born of a virgin ) in order to save us ( and His plan ). He also had to be sinless and was. He was the perfect and ONLY possible sacrifice for our salvation.
Isaiah 53:5
King James Version
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
J Mac is getting further and further from scripture the older he gets
A whole new generation coming along is going to battle this stuff again and again
I remember posting a comment on his statement to this and it being removed a few times
Folks unless they are willing to take a honest look at the text over what some man says they will never see the truth
What about Luke 22:20
In the same way he also took the cup after supper and said, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you."
I was gonna quote the Lords supper also. We are purchased by his blood 🩸✝️💜
" a propitiation through FAITH IN HIS BLOOD...Romans 3:25.
Not sure. What Bible he's reading, but my Bible says without the shedding of blood. There is no remission of sins, it's his blood.
21 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22 in the body of His flesh through DEATH, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight.
Its pack and parcel. The blood that is shed that led to His death is one and the same. If Jesus was to slice his hand so He bleeds out but not die, it would not be sufficient, it is His death that completes the sacrifice. So John MacArthur is correct. It is the same with any sacrificial animal, they did not cut it only for the blood to be on the Altar and for the animal to later be set free, but that animal had to die for the sacrifice to be complete. And even then it was only a cover, it didn't take the sin away.
I think John MacArthur is trying to explain it in a way where it’s kind of confusing because scripturally it is the blood of Christ that cleanses us from all sin. Yes, he was bleeding, but he was going to die and that’s all part of it. That’s why we take the cupand the bread and remembrance of him until he comes
Jesus’ blood is Holy not magical.
its actually both Megical doesnt mean spells necesarilly it means that which influences the world through supernatural or unknown forces thus christs blood being divine in nature was thus magical and it was Holy because of the infusion of the Holy Spirit mixed with divine creation
Or: 'miraculous'--supernaturally powerful to act upon and change men and women both spiritually and physically.
Ephesians 1:7 “IN WHOM WE HAVE REDEMPTION
THROUGH HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, ACCORDING TO THE RICHES OF HIS GRACE;”
without the SHEDDING OF BLOOD there is no remission of sins
John Calvin’s “Institutes of the Christian Religion is full of explanations of the necessity of the blood being shed to purchase us, and save us from Gods wrath, and that both were needed to obtain full redemption.
There was absolutely something special about the blood of Jesus; otherwise any person’s blood could have been used. Remember he was perfect, without spot or blemish. His blood alone was worthy and pure.
Yeah, no. It wasn't his blood that was special. No one else could've done what Jesus did because he was (1) the Son of God and (2) the only person in the entirety of history who never sinned.
@@Jason_Hubred hmmm?? 🤔 And that is the reason why HIS blood was special!! Make it make sense Jason.
OK, I was going to throw out a few scriptures but you beat me to it. That's what I get for trying to comment before the video is finished. In fact, you blew MacArthur out of the water on this one. When he says "His blood doesn't save" it just about makes me hurl my lunch. Thanks for taking this man to task Pastor Jesse!
thanks for good comment!
The sacrificial animals all bled to death, Jesus did not bleed to death, he suffered the death of his spirit (my God, my God , why have you forsaken me?) and then said "it is finished" then he willfully pushed his head forward and gave up his spirit.
@@galewollenberg786 Who said Jesus bled to death? I have never heard anyone say that. Did I miss something?
HIS BLOOD IS ALIVE!!! THAT'S WHY IT SAVES. Reformed Orthodox Theology is No Bueno
Rev 1:5 KJV, " Unto Him that loved us and washed us from our sins in His own Blood"
John MacArthur is a real piece of work! Probably one of the biggest false teacher's of our day with regard to the gospel!
It is easy to slander someone else, But i would be careful not to judge, for in the same measure it will be measured back to you.
@@4truthistrue434 Exposing false teachers is NOT slander! Jesus himself exposed all false teachers in Matthew chapter 7. We are called as believers to expose all false teachers who teach another gospel other that the one that Paul preached. Please study The Book of Galatians because that is what that book is all about. If someone who has never heard the true gospel of grace hears the false message that John MacArthur propergates, that person will not be saved and will go on believing that they are saved. We are in the end times and Satan is working overtime because he know his time is near. Please, know God's Word and stop accusing me of doing something bad when I am doing what scripture teaches! God bless!
@4truthistrue434 I hear ya, but there are countless videos of him doing the very thing you are saying. All the panels he's been associated with just straight up judging an entire generation.. Constantly judging.
@@Yaksonator Where is that condemned in Scripture? Jesus judged. His disciples judged. The apostles judged. Why can't we judge all of a sudden?
Broooooooo what??? I'm washed in his blood tho!!!!
MacArthur's teaching is like a rotten apple
Please subscribe, like and share this video if it helped you! We do pray for JMac in two ways: If he is not saved, then that he would trust in Christ. If he is saved, then that he would get cleared up of the muddy doctrines. Thanks! - Trent
Sorry 1cor 1:17
Yes! 🙏
What can wash away my sin?
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.
What can make me whole again?
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.
Jesus spoke this in Matthew 26:28 kjv - For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
"And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the bason, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the bason; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning." (Exodus 12:22) The blood of the passover lamb saved the Israelites from the destroying angel.
Blood is the only thing that covers our sins. So the blood does save us all. Jesus Christ blood that is not mine. Mine blood couldn’t save a flea on its best day.
Levititcus 17:11 "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." The new testament verses in Hebrews show the fulfilment of this verse at the cross. The blood is what was taken from the sacrifice and sprinkled on the arc of the covenant by the high priest. It was not to be a death of strangulation or with a broken bone, it was very specific.
None of you seem to be able to exegete from the original to get it correct but insist on taking all of it out of context. Oh well the apostacy of the roman church is well rooted! That cup of wine magically turns to blood.
I use to listen to and read books from John MacArthur up until 2000. He said the same thing on the radio back then, not only does MacArthur deny the shedding of the blood but MacArthur also believes that not only Christ had to die physically but Christ also had to die spiritually. Another thing is MacArthur says things real vague, so you can take what he is saying several different ways. Also, there are no Protestant Reformers who taught this heresy.
I agree with MacArthur on the necessity of the suffering and death of Jesus Christ. I disagree with MacArthur on the value of the literal blood of Jesus. Without the suffering and deaths of the savior the blood alone would be of doubtful value. We need both in the atonement.
Rom. 14:4, And who are you to judge another man"s servant?
@@galewollenberg786 You should examine that verse in context an understand what it really is saying. Usually "touch not the anointed" is used. Pastors are not beyond reproach. Paul would have never corrected Peter if they are not to be judged.
@@dieselsoggydog6299 You are the one plainly out of context having no concept of apostolic authority for Paul to correct Peter!
@@galewollenberg786 Peter was an apostle also. An apostle can correct another apostle, just as one christian can correct another. These pastors that preach bad doctrine are not above reproach from others. That is the analogy I was giving, which you missed.
Blood represents a figurative cleansing (washing), from a perfect or unspotted sacrifice. But animal sacrifices point to the human sacrifice of Christ, because it had to be a sinless human to take away sins from the rest of sinful humanity. Christ shed His literal blood and we receive the benefits - forgiveness of sins. We are not literally being washed by His literal blood, but due to the literal shedding of His blood, we receive the benefits upon accessing His grace through faith.
Without the shedding of blood there is NO REMISSION OF SIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pray first then read Chapter 9 all the way through. Maybe that'll clear it up.
Without the resurrection we are still in our sin... 1Corinthians 15:12-17. Yes, Jesus is the unblemished Lamb of God. His blood most certainly was unstained; perfect. So it made the perfect sacrifice for sin, but His resurrection gives us Everlasting Life.
well, yes but we can't take away an essential puzzle from the whole beautiful mysterious picture by our Lord Jesus Christ. His Blood cleaned us and it is also the Scripture, and then comes everlasting life... not without blood. So the words of John went far over the red line
This video was fantastic! Thank you so much!
I'm glad you addressed this. I've heard about it but never looked into it. Thank you for doing reaction videos. I like how you deal with scripture alone and don't resort to personal attacks like so many others do. ❤
Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sin. Christ had to die to shed His innocent blood to save us sinners. John 3:18. John is clearly an UNBELIEVER. He preaches a perverted message of works salvation. Not the free gift by a one time faith alone apart from any works for the Gift of God. Romans 6:23. John 3:16. Faith alone. John 6:47. God said. First John 5:13.
The gospel. First Corinthians 15:1-4. Romans 1:16. Galatians 1:6-9. Anyone who preaches any other gospel, LET THEM BE ACCURSED. And Paul said it twice.
In his book, "Hard to be saved", He says this. It is not the words we speak but the life "we" live that determines our eternal destiny. HOG WASH. It is the sinless life that Jesus lived that determines our eternal destiny. Romans 3:26-28. First John 1:8.
John believes and preaches that Jesus died for nothing and we can save ourselves.
Right on, Jim.
- Trent
💯
And who are you to judge another man's servant? Rom. 14:4.
@@galewollenberg786 I can tell false teachers, Matthew 7:15, wolves in sheep's clothing that are preaching another gospel. Not First Corinthians 15;1-4. Romans 1:16.
Galatians 1:6-9. Though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you, than we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we said before, so say I again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received of us, LET HIM BE ACCURSED.
Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin.
John plainly preaches a works based salvation. Romans 11:6. Romans 4:5-8. Romans 3:26-28.
I do not know whether He is saved or not. But what He preaches leads people to believe a false idea. That we can save our selves and Jesus died for nothing. Galatians 2:21. I do not void the grace of God, for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ died for nothing. What a horrible thing to say. Jesus gave His life a ransom to save us. John 6:47. John 10:28-29. John 3:18. First John 5:13. These things have I written unto you that BELEVE on the name of the Son of God, that ye may KNOW YE HAVE ETERNAL LIFE.
Romans 6:23. For the penalty for sin is death, but, (the good news) THE GIFT OF GOD IS ETERNAL LIFE. No one can earn it.
When we add anything to the gospel of grace, we pervert the gospel and make it by man works. Not Gods work. John 6:40 and John 6:29. Matthew 7:21-23. Romans 8:9. Without the Spirit there is no salvation. With the Spirit we have eternal life. Ephesians 1:13-14. Ephesians 4:30. Acts 16:31. John 3:18
Your reaction to this one was great! I could hear the John M video myself and knew there was something wrong but i needed you to make it seem so simple to understand how he twisted it. Shame on John M. He is too educated to make these mistakes by accident. He is a deceiver. Bless you Pastor Jesse as always.
Wise,wise soul.
@@JesusismyGOD right...he makes it seem so simple...lol
The power of the blood is everything!!! This man denies our lord the creator😢😢
With out the shedding of blood there is no remission for sin.
Hebrews 9:22
Wow, you are right. I have come in contact with many people who love to attribute their doctrine more so to church history rather than to scripture in its context.
By His stripes we were healed. That was before He even died, showing the power of His blood! Woo!
I loved your response. God shed _his own blood_ to purchase the church.
Acts 20:28
"Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God _which He purchased with His own blood."_
If you’ve read the Bible all the way through…..BLOOD Is prettttttttty significant. From The Blood of Abel which cried out from the earth to The Lord….. all the way to The Cross of Christ Jesus our Lord’s precious Blood.
Thank you pastor Jesse because he was one of the few I'd listen to but something never seemed right about his teachings and you brought it out through the scriptures thank you and may God continue to bless you and your family.
"The innocent blood of Messiah unto death is the cost exacted by lawlessness," Gregg. The shedding of blood means killing someone. If someone says you have blood on your hands, it means you are responsible for their death not that you have the actual blood on your hands. So it's an equivalency. I think this is where McArthur is coming from.
Except that’s not what the Bible teaches in the subject. The Bible teaches were are cleansed, washed and literally saved by the blood of Christ. The Bible teaches that Christ’s blood is MIRACULOUS and that there is power in His blood. John MacArthur is preaching pure heresy here. Open your ears.
cleansed by the blood of Messiah which resulted in His death. Without the death there would be no cleansing or salvation. The shedding of the blood was the means to the death (and the conquering f death) that saves us. Sometimes there's more to the story. But of course you are free to see it how you see it I'm not trying to argue with anyone, just stating what I "see".
Leviticus 17:11 (NIV):"For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one's life."
He is calling out the behavior of alot believers today who misuse the "blood" like/ as if you pray over arsenic you won't die when you drink it!!
Don't miss the lesson...Don't be disrespectful to the Blood, treating it like some ABRACADABRA thing.
No
@@cotydanger4071 Yes
lol, what? That’s not what he was saying. Go back and listen again. He is saying we are not saved by Christs blood, because in truth, John doesn’t understand the gospel.
John McArthur is not wrong.. Christ physical blood is always in reference to his death. It was Christ shedding his blood. Stop reading into the scripture. Stop saying what the scripture does not say. There is no case against what John McArthur is saying. He says it exactly right.
Amen Pastor. Thank you for this video
Revelation 12:11 They overcame him, by the word of their testimony and the BLOOD 🩸 of the Lamb.
1 John 5:7-8 And there are three that bear witness on each: the Spirit, the Water and the BLOOD.
Revelation 1:5 Unto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood, hath made us kings and priests unto God, and his Father.❤
We are reconciled by Christ's death and saved by his life.
Without the shedding of blood there is no remission ( of sins )
Hebrews 9:22
I think of the blood painted on the doorposts by the Israelites who by doing so were passed over a foreshadowing of what was to come
There are s many scriptures that point to the shedding of his blood and yes, Jesus paid our wage of sin which was death but the life was in his blood , his perfect sacrifice that superseded the temporary payment of the blood of animals because he was 💯 holy.
It is Jesus who saves. That is why He is called the Savior. Cleansing of His blood for our sin is one of the consequences of believing in and on Jesus as God and Savior for everlasting life. Other consequences are: we become new creatures in Christ, God becomes our Father, we become God's children, we receive the gift of everlasting life, all sins are forgiven, we receive Jesus' Righteousness, and we receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Revelation 1:5 And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
Brother, you said it so perfectly. The shedding of blood is what causes the death, and Jesus was the final sacrifice. I'm not trying to get into a Calvinist discussion, but it has been rearing it's ugly head where I am. When I try to point them to verses like 1 John 2:2 when they say that Jesus didn't die for the world (also see John 3:16, and Revelation 3 "Behold...I stand at the door and knock, if ANYONE hears my voice"). I have read through the New Testament, and I cannot understand how people get stuck on and elevate the writings of Paul as supreme to everything else.
I recently felt led to read each book written by the Apostle John - The one whom Jesus loved (Gospel of John, 1-3 John, and The Revelation of Jesus Christ). In 1st John, it tells us exactly how to live as Christians. We are to believe in the command of the Father, which is to love the one He sent (i.e. Jesus Christ), and Jesus Christ's command for us is to love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself. We are to be feeding, clothing, equipping the poor and less fortunate, as well as the orphans and widows. We are to be helping everyone, not building larger church buildings, but I digress.
The thing I've noticed lately is that so many established Christian churches and their pastors are falling into error. They seem to want to cause controversy, enrich themselves, and beat their chests to say "I'm right, you're wrong" and to confuse the masses as the profound simplicity of belief/faith in Jesus Christ's finished work (1 Cor. 15:1-4, John 3, Romans 10, 1 John). The arguments these pastors, and pastor, I'm not saying this to you, are divisive, and the love of Christ is not in them. I cannot fathom how a pastor could not say that the blood of Jesus has nothing to do with salvation. The legalism some portray is mindblowing.
If Jesus was under so much stress in Gethsemane He literally sweat blood because of the task set before Him praying fervently like no other prayer ever offered up to God "If it be thy will let this cup pass from Me, nevertheless not My will but Thine be done. DO you for one moment believe there was another way for Jesus Christ to buy us back? Yet if the spilling of blood without the intense suffering for our sins and death were the issue then James Harrison ruclips.net/video/DIJ8H202QFw/видео.html is the world record blood donor @ ~ 495 gallons of blood and he really did not suffer in any real painful manner to donate all that blood. If the spilling of blood alone was the issue then Jesus could have simply filled up bottles and bottles of His blood over time then spilled it on the ground. However then exactly what meaning would that have? The blood on the doorposts in the Exodus was evidence that an animal was slain for the firstborn and it stopped dead the destroyer from coming in. Yet without the sacrifice and pain of death what good would the blood be though it would be the blood of God incarnated into a sinless human. The suffering was the propitiation and the expiation without which I really do not believe the blood had that much meaning.
There is no remission of sin without the shedding of blood.
sinless blood is what made this sacrifice perfect and the LAST payment (not just a covering) for sin. I did not know John Mac said this. Never saw this before. This is a big deal.
He is a liar like his father the devil 👹
John MacArthur Cleary went against the clear teaching of scripture
Pastor Jesse, Thank you so much for bringing to our attention. Let us see, what the scripture has to say. This is so important to rightly divide the word of truth. I always felt that Paul was very protective over the message of the Cross, like when when he said in 1 cor. 1:18 he did not want to confuse the importance of the blood, with any other Religious activity. Thank you!
The Death of Christ is what makes His Blood significant. Innocent blood is deemed Innocent because that innocent soul died. if that soul did not die it would just be deemed as blood.
I think maybe all of us people that are in the chat should pray for John MacArthur because if you can reference Jesus's blood as equivalent with other bodily fluids that he didn't want to get too graphic with... That's very scary.
I'm going to pray for him and I would really appreciate any brothers and sisters in the Lord joining me with this
Ty to those who do. This man really needs to see the truth
“And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;”
(Revelation 5:9, AV)
"to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel." - Hebrews 12:24
I stopped listening to this guy decades ago. What Bible is he reading? "God presented Him as the atoning sacrifice through faith in His blood" I'm a student of the Word and I know this.
As an aside, I know the pain of dying from loss of blood. I had internal bleeding, and three or four doctors gave up on me and told my brothers to prepare a funeral for me. I was dead without the transfusions and it was painful. I often think of this and wonder how much pain Christ endured before and on that cross. Thank God!
In inserting the word magic into his talk, he seemed to be equating the blood of Jesus Christ with witchcraft in a subtle or maybe not-so-subtle. Manner, this is absolute blasphemy
It's explicitly stated in this verse. Redeemed.. with the precious blood of Christ.
I Peter 1:18-19 NKJV
[18] knowing that you were not 👉redeemed👈 with corruptible things, like silver or gold, from your aimless conduct received by tradition from your fathers, [19] but with 👉the precious blood of Christ,👈 as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.
Colossians 1:20 “Having made peace through the blood of His cross…”. This peace that Christ made through His blood is the satisfaction of God’s eschatological wrath. The first words Jesus spoke when he appeared to His disciples in their midsts, after His resurrection, was “Peace be unto you”. This was Him comforting the disciples and anyone who places their faith in Him, that they are no longer enemies of God. And this only comes by the blood He shed.
The blood and water and the spirit testify. Ron Wyatt saw the blood of Christ that came down from His crucifixion that anointed the ark of the covenant to seal all who believe in Him upon the mercy seat of God.
We are save Forever by faith Alone in Crist Alone trusting in his perfect blood shed on the cross to forgive our sins past presente and future..we are save by his precious blood.
WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT? It took the blood of Jesus to purchase our salvation! Am I hearing this correctly? This is what is causing division among Christians. So he denies Revelation 1:5? Here it is: "And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and WASHED US FROM OUR SINS IN HIS OWN BLOOD."
Man, Jesus couldn't go down to the local Stewart blood drive RV and make a blood donation!! Jesus had to pay the sacrifice with His Life!! Without the shedding of blood, means you give up your life! As a pastor, rightly dividing the Truth is one of your most important jobs! Keep at it! This a battle you might want to pass on!
Great videos. I am assuming you are using the King James translation. Can you please explain why you prefer that one?
There are plenty of reasons, but I’ll keep it practical.
1) 1 John regarding “practice sin” vs “commit sin.” KJV translates it as “commit, do.”
2) Romans 8:1. KJV includes the latter end of that verse.
3) John 7-8. KJV includes the end of John 7 and into John 8.
4) The accuracy is unparalleled concerning the Greek and Hebrew. The translators went the extra mile to make sure they did the best they can. It was a form of checks and balances.
5) There is no copyright change, nor is there a need for “making it easier to understand today.”
6) The texts the other translations are derived from (Alexandrian, Sainaticus and Vaticanus - I prob misspelled this) were oldest and well kept, but this is because they weren’t used.
7) Other figures such as Wescott and short have preferred the other texts (not the Majority text) so as to discredit their viability.
8) The KJV has stood the test of time.
There’s more, but these are some shorthand points.
- Trent
Innocent blood had to be shed in order for the guilty to be pardoned. The only Person that could pay for our sins by shedding His blood is our Lord Jesus Christ❤❤❤
God bless 🙏🏿✝️🔥
I would also like to say hello and thank you to all my brothers and sisters in Christ in the comments section. It add so much wisdom and relevant verses of GOD's Word to the video.
The Bible simply teaches us that we are saved by the Grace of God. Because God chose us for a gift to the Son as His bride. So we are saved By God through faith in Jesus Christ.
1000 % Amen and Amen !!~
Without blood there cannot have Salvation. Jesus shed his Holy Blood for all of our sins. He arose from the grave in total victory over death, the grave, and of course satan! Jesus Christ Reigns Forever!
He said there’s nothing magical( bad choice of word) in his saliva, blood ect. Did Jesus not spit in the mud and heal the blind man. He’s not wrong it’s not magical it was son of God Himself in the flesh.
I immediately thought of that as well. Jesus literally spit in the dirt, made some mud, and created new eyeballs for that man.
Agreed. There are two types of supernatural power. "Magic" is evil and Jesus Christ's supernatural power is the only one that is good.
I remember over 100 years ago the U.S currency used to be back by gold, for every dollar in use there was a certain amount of gold in weight, kept back in Banks. Regarding this, in the OT God told Moses to build Tabernacle according to the pattern he sees in Heaven. There is a lot of blood in the OT books(Deut, Lev, and Numbers). There is a Heavenly Temple with an altar. We know that sin is real, so is The Blood(Of Christ). In Rev 7:14, 12:11. I don't understand it all, I know that Our LORD still has wounds that haven't fully healed for our benefit.
I can't believe I fell for John MacArthur. I been deceived. I'm glad God help me open my eyes. John MacArthur is really a false teacher. Thank pastor Jesse for shedding light about this. I will never fall for these mega church pastors ever again. I'm glad I didn't go to Grace Community Church and other false churches. I feel blessed that the Lord protected me from harm. Amen praise the Lord hallelujah. God bless you Pastor Jesse Martinez. I'm glad I subscribed to your channel.😀😇🙌🙏👍🌞🌄🌈
I got burned big time for following and supporting pastors preaching less than clear gospel messages.
5:12 I winced at the same moment you did.
Thank you for sharing this.
Thank you for this video, I had thought about this so long
Thank you, Pastor for dealing with this issue. This man has disturbed me for decades. How would the Israelites have been saved the night of the Passover if they just killed the lamb but didn’t apply the blood! If one studies the Levitical system, the blood was always being applied. The final and perfect application is Jesus’s precious blood.
JM opinion on the matter obviously got twisted.
1. He's right about the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ: it's not magical. Not a dna extra or less. It's not supernatural. Why?
He's human. That's why. He had to be, if He's to assume the role of a Kinsman Redeemer! He's no kinsman if his blood isn't as ours.
2. What sets his human blood apart (again, not in the sense extra supernatural) is this: innocence. It is untainted by human sin.
His blood is innocent enough to pay for the guilty.
3. Quoting "Without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness of sin" to mean the blood that trickles down is enough to save has failed to acknowledge the demand of the Law: death.
Nowhere in the OT did the priests plug the wound of the animal since enough blood was shed - the animal is then released. No, the shedding drains the animals dry.
"Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man his blood will be shed; for in His own image God has made mankind." Gen 9:6
4. Life is in the blood. Indeed.
So life for life.