Yes, this is because this video was more focused on the integration part. I will be making a separate video just for the API in the upcoming days (thinking about the appropriate use case for it at the moment)
@@d.d.z. Oh! Actually, that is supposed to be private 😃 You can visit mistral.ai/, login and click on codestral to generate yours. I believe you will be asked to provide a OTP as a part of the verification in the process but that would be all.
I don't get hows that misleading, using codestral in vs code and integrating it means the same thing to me because codestral has no interface except for the "Le chat". So when someone says, "use" codestral in vs code you should get what that mean. I make weekly videos and the intention is to teach not to "mislead" and get views.
Also, here's another video in which im "using" codestral in"vs code" to build a full stack app. If you were a regular viewer, you would have realized that these videos are a part of playlist and i introduce a model, integrate it and then build apps with. Its amazing! ... and not that misleading 😊 Ciao! ruclips.net/video/9fz3tUiliGg/видео.htmlsi=C0Fpi41W0nCjiUa_
@@thecodecruise Not trying to be grammar police but "How to use codestral with VS code?" isn't the most clear title for a video where you simply integrate codestral, as in, make the VS code work so that codestral can help developers in their task by it's code Completion feature. What I expected was a video that showed how to create our own Codestral based LLM application, which, I must admit, was wrong as well. But after seeing a trend of GenAI videos titled "how to use in VS Code", I expected the same here but apparently it wasn't. And honestly, the video really should be titled Integrate, since using "use" may not be intended to mislead for views or anything but it still misleads. And, honestly, I'm pretty sure more than 90% of your viewers aren't your subscribers so there's no chance I was a regular on your channel because that's how youtube mostly works.
I know dude, its just that Mis-tral's webpage writes it as Codestral... and nobody's gonna type in on google "what is code-stral" so gotta follow the seo trends for the youtube titles.
Volume now excellent, it's a pleasure. Thank you for this review of Codestral in VS Code
Thanks!
What hardware are you running it on? Can it run fast on a 32 cores CPU or only on a big GPU?
It's not running local so its independent of the GPU, it uses Mistral's API. So you're good!
@@thecodecruise is it limited in requests amount though, as i saw while generating the api key there was a tag "free trial" ?
@n0pcode I's free on the Le chat, which is their chat version but for the API key, its only free for 8 weeks till its in Beta
You hide your your API key untill at 3:33 where it's shown in the code.
API keys are private, you can obtain yours at mistral.ai
@@rid9 How much time did you put in to slow the video down 😁 Just saying because I removed the API key from the platform 😋
Tabnine also and I think they stated this in official website....❤
Yep!
You showed the API for a brief moment. Consider to change it.
Yes, this is because this video was more focused on the integration part. I will be making a separate video just for the API in the upcoming days (thinking about the appropriate use case for it at the moment)
@@thecodecruise thank you, but besides that I was referring to the API you generated, it's visible when you clicked on Done. Great content 👍.
@@d.d.z. Oh! Actually, that is supposed to be private 😃 You can visit mistral.ai/, login and click on codestral to generate yours. I believe you will be asked to provide a OTP as a part of the verification in the process but that would be all.
@@thecodecruise I have mine, check your video again, you will see what I'm talking about.
gotcha, thanks!
The appropriate title should be "How to integrate Codestral in VS Code" but you choose to mislead. Amazing.
I don't get hows that misleading, using codestral in vs code and integrating it means the same thing to me because codestral has no interface except for the "Le chat". So when someone says, "use" codestral in vs code you should get what that mean. I make weekly videos and the intention is to teach not to "mislead" and get views.
Also, here's another video in which im "using" codestral in"vs code" to build a full stack app. If you were a regular viewer, you would have realized that these videos are a part of playlist and i introduce a model, integrate it and then build apps with.
Its amazing! ... and not that misleading 😊
Ciao!
ruclips.net/video/9fz3tUiliGg/видео.htmlsi=C0Fpi41W0nCjiUa_
@@thecodecruise Not trying to be grammar police but "How to use codestral with VS code?" isn't the most clear title for a video where you simply integrate codestral, as in, make the VS code work so that codestral can help developers in their task by it's code Completion feature.
What I expected was a video that showed how to create our own Codestral based LLM application, which, I must admit, was wrong as well. But after seeing a trend of GenAI videos titled "how to use in VS Code", I expected the same here but apparently it wasn't. And honestly, the video really should be titled Integrate, since using "use" may not be intended to mislead for views or anything but it still misleads. And, honestly, I'm pretty sure more than 90% of your viewers aren't your subscribers so there's no chance I was a regular on your channel because that's how youtube mostly works.
@@mysticlunala8020 Thanks for the feedback, I will try to accommodate it for future videos.
@@mysticlunala8020 grow up
Codéstral? It's code-stral dude. Mis-tral. Code-stral.
I know dude, its just that Mis-tral's webpage writes it as Codestral... and nobody's gonna type in on google "what is code-stral" so gotta follow the seo trends for the youtube titles.
@@thecodecruise No I mean your pronunciation. It's like nails on chalkboard to my ears, each time you say "co-des-tral". Code-stral please.
@divpolitics9520 Bear the chalk for this one my friend, I will make it up for you 🤕
I think did good this time ruclips.net/video/9fz3tUiliGg/видео.html 😉😉😉
@@thecodecruise thx man, a joy to hear