Throwing a 78 year old on the ground and telling him he had a bad fall is about all you need to know about why these guys are not qualified to be enforcing the law
Idk. Seems like willingness to harass and abuse any citizen is something police give awards for behind closed doors. So I’d say it proves he’s very qualified. Seems to be the whole point of having police. Should change it from “to protect and serve” to “to harass and abuse”
For sure it shouldn’t be an option. I understand that these body cams are publicly accessible, and it would do some harm for the public to hear police tactics, but they can edit the actual parts that can’t be shared post recording. In reality when they mute their bwc, nobody except for them could possibly know what they’re discussing.
They always do. It's a meme at this point: "We have investigated ourselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing." Any time a PD self-investigates and finds nothing wrong, then loses or settles a lawsuit over the same incident, every investigator and leader in the PD should be fired, as they have been proven to be untrustworthy or incompetent.
They generally back the officers unless the incident was bad enough to get the whole department upheaved. It's a way for them to deter you from continuing your lawsuit. If this case had a large public backlash, they would side with the public and fire the officers
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COVERING THIS. This is my girlfriend's grandfather, he actually felt like he did something wrong after they started to gaslight him after he was thrown to the ground. I was going to just send him the video, but given his age and his possible inability to understand the format of how these videos provide information, I'm going to wait and show him your video the next time we're there. I've been following your channel for years. I'm actually emotional right now to be completely honest. You need more subscribers. If you've read this far, PLEASE share this video, or at least any video from Audit the Audit that you can appreciate enough to share with your friends and family. And please subscribe. I am not being paid to say that, I promise haha. Thank you again.
I share ALLLLL of these types of videos when I see this BS going on with these cops. I am so sick and tired of seeing this shixx done to innocent citizens ESPECIALLY and almost 80 yr old man. This is sickening.
@@HaveAHeartAnimalSanctuary I show these videos to my cop buddies. They all say the same thing....cops like this make their jobs ten times are and more dangerous.
@@MessOfThings Sorry you need to admit that dude had it coming to him. Picking up trash on his own property? WTH? Who does that? That is sus activity right there! Then providing proof he lived there. He definitely had it coming to him.
@@djsi38t no, I expect to have the rights to defend my own property. The signs gave you warning, if you decide to be target practice, that is on you. Police can stay home unless I, as the owner of my property, call them.
@@Axodus *"they seem to forget innocent people's rights shall not be infringed upon."* Guilty people's rights shall not be infringed, either. Being guilty of a crime doesn't negate your rights.
They treated this guy like a criminal, yet we’ve seen countless cases of where a squatter takes possession or a bank “accidentally” seizes a home, the police refuse to intervene because it’s “a civil matter”.
Yep. This encounter had nothing to do with the elderly gentleman trespassing, and everything to do with him refusing to bow down to the swine. This is clearly a 'Contempt of Cop' response.
And not to mention how you might need to do lease agreement with relative, so they can get cops actually evict actual squatters, while if owner calls about it, they ether arrest him or tell its civil matter.
I fully agree, but it's actually "should HAVE," not "should OF." The "of" you're hearing is actually "should've." I don't know why so many zeds don't know that, but now you do!
@friendshipbunny2559 because people are ignorant and don't care about language rules. Why do you think the dumbest people drive language changes in the general population while the educated drive language change in pockets of society, creating 2 languages from 1.
How can you even show up to a suspected trespassing on a foreclosed house without even checking whether or not the house is ACTUALLY foreclosed??? This shouldn't even be possible.
pssst, the secret sauce to tyranny and authoritarianism...is thinking some sort of after life will fix/restore these problems. Right? Push the actual fixing and addressing the problem under the after life rug. Modern Christianity is basically this after life rug.
pssst, the secret sauce to tyranny and authoritarianism...is thinking some sort of after life will fix/restore these problems. Right? Push the actual fixing and addressing the problem under the after life rug. Modern Christianity is basically this after life rug.
They essentially took the word of an anonymous caller who believed the house was foreclosed. The cop essentially forcibly stole the license. These cops have zero business being cops and are unable to investigate anything.
@@JustMe-fo4ev Well there's also the matter of the legal term reasonable articulable suspicion (RAS) of a crime. A RAS is a low standard, but it is a higher standard than a hunch and the court made it clear an anonymous call who is not directly witnessing a crime is not enough to form RAS. Although the anonymous caller allegedly witnessed people on the property, as the non-owner and being anonymous they cannot say without a doubt the persons on the property are in fact trespassing. ^^ This was proven by 2 factors: 1. The house was not in foreclosure 2. The "people" on the property were in fact the owners I'm sorry for the long explanation, but this is important as the police cannot legally detain you without reasonable suspicion (RAS). Additionally, civilians are not obligated to assist the police in their investigation. As a person operating a motor vehicle the driver was obligated to present his ID to the officers, but the officers technically had no reason to detain him and ask for ID to begin with. What really could have solved this is the cops understanding what the words on the sign meant, asking for ID (which they technically could not demand and technically did receive), and releasing the civilians once they realized that their address of record was the property on question. We are not obligated to help the police investigate; so after whatever questions we choose to answer have been answered the police have to let us go unless they find additional evidence (or we self incriminate which is why you should invoke the 5th). It's the job of the police to investigate on their own. 911 systems record the phone number of the caller so why did the police fail to back trace the number, and speak to the caller in person?
@@MegaKaiser7 Yep which would fall under me saying it could have been handled better and differently so I don't really know what your reply adds to the conversation. The call also stated squatters were there so police likely had to go over there at the very least at that point.
@@JustMe-fo4ev “better and differently” gives off an “oh well, aw shucks” feel. The truth of the matter was it was sheer laziness that ended up with this guy thrown down the way he was.
I’m not surprised 16:22 at all. “We’ve investigated ourselves and found out that the force used on a 78 year old man was completely justified. After all, he’s elderly, so like who cares?”
"Just take the cuffs off" when the officer said that, he knew they messed up. I hope this gets laughed out of court and they get the justice they deserve.
Wow, absolutely brutal for the old man. 78? Y’all are treating a 78 year old man like this? for what? Disgraceful, imagine this was your grandpa or dad 😔
I remember this one, the cops don’t know what a foreclosure is, and tried to make up a charge. Pure garbage. The cops were the ones who were doing the trespassing.
Still a civil issue, not anything for the police to do until the civil actions were decided. And at that…. Unless he sued himself, there was no crime here
@@jsncrsocourts already rueld if the call is anonymous there is nothing to much the cops can do. They can ask questions buy if the answers don't match any part of the call give them no legal groudn to do anything. Also of you watched the video the man explains the whole thing the cops was wromg from the jump.
so basically this is a crime of living next to a nosey neighbor cause why are you lookin at my door so hard that you see a paper or people from the town at my house 😂
imagine a cop randomly entering your property to question if your the actual owner and make you show them documents and stuff just because some random person called the cops and said unchecked stuff
The police should be fired for not doing a proper investigation. They took one look at the sign and didn’t even bother to read the entire thing. None of this happens if they just read the entire posting. But nope, they just skim over it and assault an old man because that’s what they wanted to do the entire time.
They never go after the callers. Because those calls = revenue. They'll never make people think twice before calling because that would invalidate most of their employment and negate a good amount of their revenue. For most of the officers out there, if they get a call, someone is going to pay. They love getting calls.
@@bojohannesen4352 he was incredibly calm and collected for someone being unlawfully harrassed by the government. Any sane person would be angry in that circumstance
I love how cops like to say “he tried to fight me.” The man tried to get back what you took from his hand! If he wanted to “fight” you he could have punched you in the face. You know he wasn’t “fighting” you!
He was 'out here trying to run people over' too. Smfh. How many lies can come out of a pigs mouth in one short vid? Imagine being such a piece of shit to rough up a 78 year old man and then telling a shit load of lies about it. Pathetic and repulsive.
Lmao as if a 78 year old man could beat up a police officer in his prime. The dude that said that should be fired immediately with that kind of behavior. If you and your buddy get beat up by a 78 year old man then you shouldn’t be a cop to begin with. Sheesh.
@@Not_Ciel Usually I would agree, though I will say my uncle, who was 71 at the time, beat the shit out of the truancy officer who came after my cousin so don't underestimate all old men.
Okay, so apparently in Utah, if you call the police and tell them your neighbors have been foreclosed on, they’ll come right out to harass them regardless of the facts or even the law. However, if you report your neighbor is beating and starving their kids, it takes 3 goddamn years and one of the kids climbing through a window to get help for them to respond. Good to know.
“You started grabbing people and trying to run people over” Their ability to blatantly lie and gaslight people without hesitation never fails to amaze me.
9:10 the officer says “he was detained until he started grabbing people and trying to run people over” definitely missed that part in the video. His qualified immunity should be forfeited for lying to other LEO.
Qualified Immunity should be abolished period. Cops get way to much protection that allows them to get away with a lot more shit than anyone else could.
I’m a 71 year old lady living in the UK. I came across this channel by accident and I’m transfixed. So impressed with the format of videos and quality of USA law information but I am beyond horrified at the behaviour of the police. One of the benefits of social Media is that this information reaches a wide audience
Atter seeing videos such as this one I think anyone would be horrified at the police behavior shown. The good news though is that cases like this are actually very rare here despite how these videos make it seem. While this channel has hundreds, possibly thousands, of cases of officers behaving badly, you must remember that we are talking about years of real world time across a land mass the size of the USA, in which every single day there are probably millions of police interactions nationwide. When you are talking about billions of total police interactions having only a failure rate in the three to four digits long while still tragically too big is well within statistical norms for any country.
We the people university covered this months ago. These calls are ridiculous, the homeowner was treated like a criminal. And they snatched his ID out his hand, yet tried to say the guy tried to fight the cop. I hope he wins his lawsuit!
I bet if someone tossed around their damn near 80-year-old dad, they would be fighting mad. But it's completely fine to beat up everyone else's Grandpa/Dad. The way he just ripped his license out of his hand really angered me. These cops should be ashamed of themselves. Absolutely no respect for elderly people.
Turning off your body camera after a physical altercation should be a crime. If more than one turns it off, it should be treated as a conspiracy to commit that crime.
Okay, so when it's a bunch of young thugs, squatting is a civil matter, but when it's a couple in their 70s, you beat them up and make up a charge. Great.
@@glee21012 stupid reply, doesnt matter. The fact a cop in one state would treat a squatter like that but in another state treat a 78 year old homeowner this way is beyond fucked up. different jurisdiction is just a bunch of crap its not an excuse this guy has a point here.
So we have a policy where we can mute body cameras that we control and that we can audit/blur out any information before submitting it for public view. Body cams should never be allowed to be changed in any form by court purposes. If it’s sensitive information, I’m pretty sure it’s not sensitive enough for a judge and 2 lawyers to view in chambers. If they can mute this when releasing it, there’s no need what so ever to ever mute body cams.
You inspire me. I am a law graduate and I live in Brazil, we don't have anything like your channel down here. I plan on one day creating a channel inspired by your to analyze the interactions between individuals and the brazilian police/civil service officials in general. Kudos, my man. God bless you. ∴
11:42 disgusting behavior from the cops. “You did this to yourself cause your wouldn’t comply, and also, we can’t read signs that are posted and don’t understand what a foreclosure is”.
Truly disgusting. Rushing up to an elderly couple and accusing them of trespassing in their own home, and then being harmed for reaching for his license.
Might be my European point of view but he did do it to himself. conversation could've gone like this. cop: You are trespassing Man: No, I live here. here is my ID and the keys to the house. cop: there is a sign that says foreclosure man: No thats only for the bassement. cop: "Checks name with dispatch, goes to read sign again" OK seems fine, sorry for the inconvenience. Situation fixed. also shouldn't have tried to drive away and start shouting. Also Americans so uptight about giving their ID/license to cops as if they couldn't figure out everything about you without. I will never understand
@@plzcallmymom he gave his ID. And he doesn’t need to show keys to the house. The issue was, there was no foreclosure to begin with, the cops can’t read a sign.
I have an incident I'd like to hear more about. A woman in NYC was jailed for not complying when police were called to her apartment that she rented to evict squatters. Not sure if I have all the details. She kept saying "they're arresting me and taking me out of my house" Have you heard about this?
Love this channel everybody should watch it because you learn about law. I know it's a little bit boring at times but man this guy's well informed and it's good information to have
Welcome to America, where you can be arrested for tresspassing on your own property. Meanwhile, ACTUAL squatters have to be taken to court because it's a "civil matter".
The old man is a legend!! Such a sweet man geniunely confused what whas going on but still very clear to the officers in my opinion. Hope the couple is doing good! And hope the officers dont sleep well ever again
Seriously. This psycho pig is lucky he didn't kill this guy. My neighbor was 83 and she got hurt (mysteriously. She never would tell me what happened) one night when some family I never met came to stay. She was the toughest woman I ever met and after she broke her hip she was a shell of her former self 6 months later. It was fucking heart breaking because we were very close.
Muting to Confer should be illegal. They are coming up with an EXCUSE to pin a crime on someone since they have nothing and they know they just screwed up.
This man reminds me so much of my grandfather and his brothers. Stand up for yourself. My grandpa would always tell me it’s his right to demand a warrant if they wanted to search. Even though he was a law abiding citizen. He would have filed a law suit as well. Makes me miss and respect him even more.
On Nov 22, 2023. The Ogden Police Dept posted on their Facebook page about this incident. It read, ""The Ogden Police Department is aware of a complaint filed by Attorney Bob Sykes. The complaint is in regards to Ogden Police case 22G85110 which occurred on November 29th, 2022. Rand Briem was charged with Interfering with an Arresting Officer. The case is still pending in the Ogden Justice Court. A complete After Action Use of Force review was completed in November of 2022. There is complete Body Worn Camera footage of the interaction which was reviewed by the officers chain of command as part of our After Action Review process. The Ogden Police Department is confident that the court will find our officers use of force justified as our internal review did."" That last sentence says it all. Bunch of tyrants. The whole department.
Apart from the flagrant lie that "there is complete Body Worn Camera footage of the interaction ...", how could any reasonable person view the footage and conclude it was appropriate to put him on the ground under these circumstances? So you're correct. This wasn't just two power-tripping cops acting disgracefully. It's the entire chain of command for the department endorsing tyrannical behavior.
@@jeepliving1 I completely agree but don’t worry, there will be a bunch of bootlickers showing up that can’t think for themselves. They will attempt to work together to develop a half-cocked narrative (if their media overlords don’t have one). Some of them are already in this comment section working it out. So far at least one goober has attempted to justify the aggressive license snatch by saying “people don’t own their license, the state does”.
So many stories like this, with people on their own property. And yes, i understand as a cop, you do not know who that person is, but a simply check with their radio to dispatch, get the owners name/date of birth based upon the address, ask the person on the property their name and birth (no need to ID as its extreme unlikely that a trespasser knows the exact name and birth year/date) and done. See, how easy that is and it did not involve the need for any ID. How many people even carry their ID on them, when they are on their own property. 99% of them need to enter the home to get the ID, and then we enter the whole cops that enter with people into their homes issue.
@@benjiro8793Investigation is way too much work though, it's easier to just "investigate" and let the courts figure things out with taxpayer money later
Muting to confer basically means we have something to hide in the discussion we are about to have. And, in court, hiding evidence should be assumed to be a criminal act.
The ironic part is if you call as a property owner and want the police to remove squatters on your property they cops won't do a thing. They always say its a "Civil matter" and walk away.
Lesson Learned: If you live in Ogden and you seriously want to prank your neighbor or maybe you want to get even with your boss then just call Ogden PD and file an anonymous complaint and let the Blue Bulldogs do the rest. Why is there no repercussions for the idiots that initiate these incidents?
Qualified Immunity. Can't read? Too lazy to do any real investigation? Impulse control problems? ADHD? Don't know any laws? Not a problem; you've got qualified immunity, just do whatever you want, you'll never be held responsible.
He could literally have DEMENTIA! or any illness at that age, broken rib/hip/ect from a fall, brittle bones in general, what type of loser does that ? he can’t over power a old man even if he was struggling with them? he’s gunna go home to his wife n kids knowing he abused a 78 y old before coming home.
They couldn't even finish reading the notice in plain view on the house. Those officers couldn't investigate their way out of a paper bag. Even if it hadn't been for their despicable behavior after all that, I wouldn't have wanted them on the force. Edit: grammar
The mortgage company didn’t call them to report a foreclosure or complain that someone is trespassing at a property that they foreclosed on. They can’t take the word of someone that’s in the neighborhood because they really don’t know what’s going on with that property.
Our justice system sucks! And no "internal review" should be enough to exonerate the officers! It was BLATANTLY OBVIOUS they abused that man!!! JFC...makes me wanna SCREAM!!! 😠
Serious question. How would you handle it as a police officer? “Someone made a phone call” and you have been asked by the dispatcher to attend the call. What would you do? Tell the dispatcher that there is a person there, but I can’t legally question them? Or? I am from UK.. just wondering.
It doesn't sound like a call that can be solved in the field. At the end of the interaction those cops don't have any clue if the house was foreclosed on or when. So they don't know if he can be there or not. Getting his ID doesn't advance that. They needed more information before arriving at the house. They failed their investigation further when they couldn't understand the sign on the front door and took it to mean their anonymous tip was correct.
Personally, I would have simply let the man leave. After all, the supposed illegality was him staying on the property so him leaving the property should have been allowed. I would have simply written a report that I arrived at the property in question, witnessed an elderly man leaving the premises in a vehicle and finished by putting in a request to the department for a follow up visitation / investigation.
It is a crime. Violating the constitution is also a crime. Excessive force is also a crime. And not a single one of these cops will be charged with it because they are considered above the law and don’t have to follow to same laws me and you do. It’s a disgrace.
I personally dealt with the latter recently. Cop tried to force his way into my house without a warrant and without any exigent circumstances. Filed a report and requested the body cam footage showing him doing it. "We don't have any of that footage b/c officers are only required to start recording when they make contact with an individual." I told them "So as long as there's no one looking, you guys can do whatever the fuck you want and violate any amendment you see fit and it's all gravy b/c you don't record shit. Or you probably do record it and just delete it when it incriminates you. Nice job on the internal investigation. Not corrupt at all..."
This is infuriating. The way these officers discuss the incident exactly describes their mindset: "You took a hard fall." Do you mean when you pushed an elderly man to the ground when he tried to get his ID back after you grabbed it from him? "You tried to run us over." Do you mean when he tried to leave his property and you were standing in his driveway trespassing? Unbelievable.
ATA i think it'd be a nice idea to create some vids showing end results of these pending lawsuits with videos. I would love to see the results of these and many other lawsuits.
Exactly. Without an eviction notice posted these clowns have no reason to detain or arrest them. These kinds of criminal cops need to be charged, jailed and their pensions should be forfeited to their victims. End qualified immunity and disband the FOP.
Doesn't the fact you can mute them invalidate the whole point? Instead of "this is a record of everything that happened", it's literally "this is what happened minus what the cop personally cut out"
@@keya31gville The blockchain isn't a good idea. I think a simple online server is better and easier to access. Not only this but the files don't even need to be hosted on police servers themselves, they can be hosted on the Internet Archive which is the case for a lot of government documents already, like the unsealed Epstein/Maxwell documents.
The man was on his own property and had broken no law. He had no duty to identify to aggressive officers that had performed absolutely no investigation whatsoever. The fact that officers physically attacked a man in which had broken no law is testament to their lack of confirming any crime had occurred before resorting to violence. And understanding that even if that homeowner was in fact a criminal, the criminal would be set free because of a “technicality” that police had not established any reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain a suspect. It’s “fruit of a poisonous tree” doctrine.
When people say this I always ask them if you get pulled over and the cop says pull down your pants and bend over the hood you're going to comply right???
Throwing a 78 year old on the ground and telling him he had a bad fall is about all you need to know about why these guys are not qualified to be enforcing the law
Imagine how these two might treat their families behind closed doors and
Yeah, they acted like thuggish gangsters with this guy. I'm surprised they didn't hand him a napkin and tell him to clean himself up 🙄
After they snatched the license too
I often wonder if they get erections from making a power move like this one.
Idk. Seems like willingness to harass and abuse any citizen is something police give awards for behind closed doors. So I’d say it proves he’s very qualified. Seems to be the whole point of having police. Should change it from “to protect and serve” to “to harass and abuse”
Muting bodycams shouldn’t be possible . Function should be disabled . Disgraceful
That policy needs to be changed immediately.
The only reason it exists is provide plausible deniability for officers
IMHO, it's equivalent to disabling the bank security camera. Preparing to commit a crime?
SHOULD BE DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE !!
For sure it shouldn’t be an option. I understand that these body cams are publicly accessible, and it would do some harm for the public to hear police tactics, but they can edit the actual parts that can’t be shared post recording. In reality when they mute their bwc, nobody except for them could possibly know what they’re discussing.
The fact that the “internal review” found the officer’s actions justified is batshit insane. Talk about a systematic failure.
They always do. It's a meme at this point: "We have investigated ourselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing."
Any time a PD self-investigates and finds nothing wrong, then loses or settles a lawsuit over the same incident, every investigator and leader in the PD should be fired, as they have been proven to be untrustworthy or incompetent.
The supervisors making these decisions should be named so they can carry this decision with them “proudly”.
They're not officers, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo.
They generally back the officers unless the incident was bad enough to get the whole department upheaved. It's a way for them to deter you from continuing your lawsuit. If this case had a large public backlash, they would side with the public and fire the officers
It's part of trying to minimize the lawsuits paid out to the citizens they've wronged.
Love this old man. He said and I quote "....I don't think you have enough back up. You should call SWAT." 78 Y.o. this is a man
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COVERING THIS. This is my girlfriend's grandfather, he actually felt like he did something wrong after they started to gaslight him after he was thrown to the ground. I was going to just send him the video, but given his age and his possible inability to understand the format of how these videos provide information, I'm going to wait and show him your video the next time we're there. I've been following your channel for years. I'm actually emotional right now to be completely honest. You need more subscribers. If you've read this far, PLEASE share this video, or at least any video from Audit the Audit that you can appreciate enough to share with your friends and family. And please subscribe. I am not being paid to say that, I promise haha. Thank you again.
I hope he gets paid
Does your girlfriend take it balls deep?
You or someone definitely should file complaints. I’m so sorry.
@@kittydollkori it's all already been done. Trust me. Thank you for your concern ♥️
I share ALLLLL of these types of videos when I see this BS going on with these cops. I am so sick and tired of seeing this shixx done to innocent citizens ESPECIALLY and almost 80 yr old man. This is sickening.
You would think that violating the Constitution would be a serious crime
In America the second amendment is the only right that we care about. Literally all other human rights are optional /s
It is, but rarely charged
"started grabbing people and trying to run people over" all a lie, what cowards.
Qualified immunity has made our bureaucrats into a privileged ruling class of tyrants.
@@HaveAHeartAnimalSanctuary I show these videos to my cop buddies. They all say the same thing....cops like this make their jobs ten times are and more dangerous.
Cop, "the neighbor is trespassing you from this house that he doesn't own" 😂😂😂😂😂
Wow, my own no trespassing signs can be used by police to say that they have reason to investigate me for being on my property?
Look up
Zayd Atkinson
@@MessOfThings Sorry you need to admit that dude had it coming to him. Picking up trash on his own property? WTH? Who does that? That is sus activity right there! Then providing proof he lived there. He definitely had it coming to him.
with a call to 911 of suspicious behavior?....you are damn right...would you want police to ignore such calls about people on your property?.
@@djsi38t no, I expect to have the rights to defend my own property. The signs gave you warning, if you decide to be target practice, that is on you. Police can stay home unless I, as the owner of my property, call them.
@@djsi38tWith that logic, any neighbor who dislikes you could swat you at any time because he thinks your acting suspiciously
What I learn from these videos: whenever officers mess up, they charge the victim with "interference" or "disorderly conduct".
Disorderly is "not bowing down to a cop's authority" about 99.99% of the time.
“All you had to do was comply and you wouldn’t have gotten hurt”
@@zakers202 they seem to forget innocent people's rights shall not be infringed upon.
"Obstruction" is another one of their magic go-to's.
@@Axodus
*"they seem to forget innocent people's rights shall not be infringed upon."*
Guilty people's rights shall not be infringed, either. Being guilty of a crime doesn't negate your rights.
They treated this guy like a criminal, yet we’ve seen countless cases of where a squatter takes possession or a bank “accidentally” seizes a home, the police refuse to intervene because it’s “a civil matter”.
The American Taliban Strikes again!!!!!!
Yep. This encounter had nothing to do with the elderly gentleman trespassing, and everything to do with him refusing to bow down to the swine. This is clearly a 'Contempt of Cop' response.
And not to mention how you might need to do lease agreement with relative, so they can get cops actually evict actual squatters, while if owner calls about it, they ether arrest him or tell its civil matter.
Exactly
@@Hellsong89 they never really read what was on the door. They took the 1 cops word for it. Everyone should have read the notice.
I love that “should of just complied” really gives Comply or Die energy.
I fully agree, but it's actually "should HAVE," not "should OF." The "of" you're hearing is actually "should've." I don't know why so many zeds don't know that, but now you do!
This could have went differently if the retort was “are those level 3 plates?”
“Should of” 🤦🏽♂️
That sounds like something a guy says of the women he just beat.
@friendshipbunny2559 because people are ignorant and don't care about language rules. Why do you think the dumbest people drive language changes in the general population while the educated drive language change in pockets of society, creating 2 languages from 1.
Given the guys age, the force wasnt only unreasonable, but deadly as well
Right! Hell for all they knew the guy could have been on blood thinners cause of
At that age, blood thinners like the other guy said, hear problems, brittle bones, hip problems, reparatory issues.
Zero investigation, zero knowledge. They came in based off a random caller, didn’t verify anything. Pathetic
And they didn't take an extra two seconds to read and comprehend the sign.
Oh, wait, that would require reading skills and comprehension skills...
Was it a prank call? Why don't we find out about that?
Typical FEELINGS Police.
How can you even show up to a suspected trespassing on a foreclosed house without even checking whether or not the house is ACTUALLY foreclosed??? This shouldn't even be possible.
@@thomasarmstrong9327They can't even get addresses right in the first place.
To tell a bloodied old man "we told you what we wanted, you wanted to fight"
Theres a special place in hell waiting for these cowards
A very very special place. Bunch of new aged nazis.
pssst, the secret sauce to tyranny and authoritarianism...is thinking some sort of after life will fix/restore these problems. Right? Push the actual fixing and addressing the problem under the after life rug.
Modern Christianity is basically this after life rug.
Absolutely.
having the audacity to cite him for it in an attempt to cover their assess is just the icing on the cake
pssst, the secret sauce to tyranny and authoritarianism...is thinking some sort of after life will fix/restore these problems. Right? Push the actual fixing and addressing the problem under the after life rug.
Modern Christianity is basically this after life rug.
"We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing."
"We are confident the courts will agree with us" sounds like a veiled threat when it comes from a police department.
Confidence and ignorance are a terrible combination
They essentially took the word of an anonymous caller who believed the house was foreclosed. The cop essentially forcibly stole the license. These cops have zero business being cops and are unable to investigate anything.
they did have to respond to the call but ya basically the entire thing could have gotten handled differently and better
@@JustMe-fo4ev Well there's also the matter of the legal term reasonable articulable suspicion (RAS) of a crime.
A RAS is a low standard, but it is a higher standard than a hunch and the court made it clear an anonymous call who is not directly witnessing a crime is not enough to form RAS. Although the anonymous caller allegedly witnessed people on the property, as the non-owner and being anonymous they cannot say without a doubt the persons on the property are in fact trespassing.
^^ This was proven by 2 factors:
1. The house was not in foreclosure
2. The "people" on the property were in fact the owners
I'm sorry for the long explanation, but this is important as the police cannot legally detain you without reasonable suspicion (RAS). Additionally, civilians are not obligated to assist the police in their investigation. As a person operating a motor vehicle the driver was obligated to present his ID to the officers, but the officers technically had no reason to detain him and ask for ID to begin with.
What really could have solved this is the cops understanding what the words on the sign meant, asking for ID (which they technically could not demand and technically did receive), and releasing the civilians once they realized that their address of record was the property on question.
We are not obligated to help the police investigate; so after whatever questions we choose to answer have been answered the police have to let us go unless they find additional evidence (or we self incriminate which is why you should invoke the 5th). It's the job of the police to investigate on their own. 911 systems record the phone number of the caller so why did the police fail to back trace the number, and speak to the caller in person?
@@JustMe-fo4evan extremely quick search would have told you if the property was foreclosed or not.
@@MegaKaiser7 Yep which would fall under me saying it could have been handled better and differently so I don't really know what your reply adds to the conversation.
The call also stated squatters were there so police likely had to go over there at the very least at that point.
@@JustMe-fo4ev “better and differently” gives off an “oh well, aw shucks” feel. The truth of the matter was it was sheer laziness that ended up with this guy thrown down the way he was.
I’m not surprised 16:22 at all. “We’ve investigated ourselves and found out that the force used on a 78 year old man was completely justified. After all, he’s elderly, so like who cares?”
Got to love when the police investigate themselves.
The only justice in America is vigilante justice
Needs to be a third party board to review and punish the police, preferably one assembled by local citizens.
Some more HERO SHIT!!!!😡😡😡😡
@@xxIAshesIxx Don't disagree but never happening
"I think you guys should call a SWAT Team, you don't have enough back up." Priceless.
"Muting to confer" should be a mandatory 20 year prison sentence.
Their "muting" of microphones is tampering with evidence and should be a felony in all departments.
It still wouldn't matter because of qualified immunity.
Muting microphones button on all Police & Security guards cameras should be removed from the devices
It's absurd that any unsubstantiated phone call can allow a violation of your rights.
It's called "swatting"
@@GaryGoldbaugh No it's not.
@@fkcoolers2669 are you a cop, because youre dumb enough to be one.
And all they had to do was ask him for ID at the top, politely.
We got a call = your rights suspended
Wrong, but it's how cops think.
"Not going to fight when these come off are ya?" This police officer is beyond immoral
"Just take the cuffs off" when the officer said that, he knew they messed up.
I hope this gets laughed out of court and they get the justice they deserve.
Snatching that man’s ID like that was straight up childish.
Cops are childish…
All part of the Ego Escalation training they receive
Not as childish as throwing the old man down because he wanted it back.
AND UNLAWFUL...
@@matthewmuellner and then gaslighting him, saying he fell down!
"That was a pretty hard fall that you took."
That's a creative way to avoid saying "I threw you down on the ground pretty hard."
"I knocked you down pretty good didn't I? Kinda why I joined the force :) cant wait to sleep soundly tonight"
How do we tackle playground bullying or domestic abuse when police are trained in same tactics
Wow, absolutely brutal for the old man. 78? Y’all are treating a 78 year old man like this? for what? Disgraceful, imagine this was your grandpa or dad 😔
It is your grandpa or Dad. Here in South Central. The neighbors would all come out & defend this man. We don't play about our elderly
wow dude straight up snatched it.
these cops are GARBAGE
I remember this one, the cops don’t know what a foreclosure is, and tried to make up a charge. Pure garbage. The cops were the ones who were doing the trespassing.
Doesn't matter if it was a foreclosure or not, the call came in as trespassing squatters.
@@jsncrso2:53 is where the cop explains about the foreclosure, so it does matter in context of why they were there.
Still a civil issue, not anything for the police to do until the civil actions were decided. And at that…. Unless he sued himself, there was no crime here
@@jsncrsocourts already rueld if the call is anonymous there is nothing to much the cops can do. They can ask questions buy if the answers don't match any part of the call give them no legal groudn to do anything.
Also of you watched the video the man explains the whole thing the cops was wromg from the jump.
@@jsncrsoAnother bootlicker who didn't watch the video.
So many aggressive police interactions start with "We got an anonymous call that you're a criminal. Present yourself for arrest!"
At this point, it's not even accurate to call US cops "police", not even Nutsee Germany was so brutal.
so basically this is a crime of living next to a nosey neighbor cause why are you lookin at my door so hard that you see a paper or people from the town at my house 😂
imagine a cop randomly entering your property to question if your the actual owner and make you show them documents and stuff just because some random person called the cops and said unchecked stuff
Sounds like a lot like a fascist govt from the 40s
Disgusting - these "officers" needed to be prosecuted for Assault, fired and NEVER be allowed to be in any law enforcement position ever again
And whoever conducted the alleged "internal review" should be considered an accomplice.
9:06 meanwhile they're conspiring to set him up for attempted murder of a police officer....
Sounds like the neighbor should be charged with a false report.
Wanna bet there was no report?
And they should mind their own business too.
The police should be fired for not doing a proper investigation. They took one look at the sign and didn’t even bother to read the entire thing. None of this happens if they just read the entire posting. But nope, they just skim over it and assault an old man because that’s what they wanted to do the entire time.
They never go after the callers. Because those calls = revenue. They'll never make people think twice before calling because that would invalidate most of their employment and negate a good amount of their revenue. For most of the officers out there, if they get a call, someone is going to pay. They love getting calls.
@@skillethead15 - now you are assuming that the police officers can in fact read.
They'd be first to scream if this happened to their parents
"We have conducted an internal investigation on ourselves and determined we did nothing wrong"
Protected and served the shit outta those senior citizens 🫡👌
Literally at 6:40
Heros. They deserve a medal.
Being old is not a get-out-of-jail free card. He was unhinged, God have mercy on all the people he interact with.
@@bojohannesen4352Right the old man made that situation worse he didn't have to lash out
@@bojohannesen4352 he was incredibly calm and collected for someone being unlawfully harrassed by the government. Any sane person would be angry in that circumstance
I'm floored that these actions could be even remotely legal.
That is so respectful that you didnt give the old man a grade. And its true, old people can be senile and need more care when speaking to them.
I love how cops like to say “he tried to fight me.” The man tried to get back what you took from his hand! If he wanted to “fight” you he could have punched you in the face. You know he wasn’t “fighting” you!
He was 'out here trying to run people over' too. Smfh. How many lies can come out of a pigs mouth in one short vid? Imagine being such a piece of shit to rough up a 78 year old man and then telling a shit load of lies about it. Pathetic and repulsive.
They definitely knew he wasn't trying to fight them. They just had to "justify" their charges against that they came up with after "muting to confer."
9:06 apparently he also tried to run them over with his car.
Lmao as if a 78 year old man could beat up a police officer in his prime. The dude that said that should be fired immediately with that kind of behavior. If you and your buddy get beat up by a 78 year old man then you shouldn’t be a cop to begin with. Sheesh.
@@Not_Ciel Usually I would agree, though I will say my uncle, who was 71 at the time, beat the shit out of the truancy officer who came after my cousin so don't underestimate all old men.
Okay, so apparently in Utah, if you call the police and tell them your neighbors have been foreclosed on, they’ll come right out to harass them regardless of the facts or even the law.
However, if you report your neighbor is beating and starving their kids, it takes 3 goddamn years and one of the kids climbing through a window to get help for them to respond.
Good to know.
I guess in Utah this is what they do instead of swatting?
@@S8ERnope swatting still happens in Utah, and has resulted in several people being shot.
Look at the bald cop, he's obviously pro child abuse cults. Yt people aren't good for much else
“You started grabbing people and trying to run people over”
Their ability to blatantly lie and gaslight people without hesitation never fails to amaze me.
How can we have any sort of faith in the process if they are clearly in the wrong and yet their actions are validated after an internal review
9:10 the officer says “he was detained until he started grabbing people and trying to run people over” definitely missed that part in the video. His qualified immunity should be forfeited for lying to other LEO.
Lying is cowardice
@@mikeveis6393 You summed it all up with three words. I agree with you.
Qualified Immunity should be abolished period. Cops get way to much protection that allows them to get away with a lot more shit than anyone else could.
@@snyperwulffgaming9575 That's why their gang is so successful, they get to make their very own laws.
I don't know how it isn't defamation it's like we hold cops to a lower standard of conduct than everyday citizens. Make it make sense!
Taking somebodies property by force is robbery. The police literally just robbed an old man, while trespassing on his property.
@@TP517You never are forced to give your ID, only to present it to be visible and legible.
G@@TP517 yet the state makes you pay money so you can carry around their property.
@@TP517mmmm. How's them boots taste?
No a drivers license is your property the state of Washington ruled on it and many others
This is called Monday for the police
“Alright that was one second” 😂😂
I’m a 71 year old lady living in the UK. I came across this channel by accident and I’m transfixed. So impressed with the format of videos and quality of USA law information but I am beyond horrified at the behaviour of the police.
One of the benefits of social
Media is that this information reaches a wide audience
Atter seeing videos such as this one I think anyone would be horrified at the police behavior shown. The good news though is that cases like this are actually very rare here despite how these videos make it seem. While this channel has hundreds, possibly thousands, of cases of officers behaving badly, you must remember that we are talking about years of real world time across a land mass the size of the USA, in which every single day there are probably millions of police interactions nationwide. When you are talking about billions of total police interactions having only a failure rate in the three to four digits long while still tragically too big is well within statistical norms for any country.
We the people university covered this months ago. These calls are ridiculous, the homeowner was treated like a criminal. And they snatched his ID out his hand, yet tried to say the guy tried to fight the cop. I hope he wins his lawsuit!
Me too 😮😮
He won't and you won't do shit about it
@@GurziakHe never said he was fine do shit, tough guy. Go learn to read
@@Gurziak dude are you okay?? 😭😭😭
@@Gurziak Until someone does 🤞
I bet if someone tossed around their damn near 80-year-old dad, they would be fighting mad. But it's completely fine to beat up everyone else's Grandpa/Dad. The way he just ripped his license out of his hand really angered me. These cops should be ashamed of themselves. Absolutely no respect for elderly people.
No respect for anyone and then they get offended when people are scared of them
We can't let them keep getting away with this.
I wonder if Utah has statutes relating to Elder Abuse?
My guess is their dads/granddads beat them and taught them it's normal to abuse other humans.
Great stuff! Keep up the EXCEPTIONAL work
Thanks for the follow-up!
Turning off your body camera after a physical altercation should be a crime. If more than one turns it off, it should be treated as a conspiracy to commit that crime.
How dumb they treat the general public is almost more infuriating than all the crimes our crime stoppers get away with
Okay, so when it's a bunch of young thugs, squatting is a civil matter, but when it's a couple in their 70s, you beat them up and make up a charge. Great.
Different jurisdictions, you have evidnece THIS police dept does what you say?
@@glee21012 stupid reply, doesnt matter. The fact a cop in one state would treat a squatter like that but in another state treat a 78 year old homeowner this way is beyond fucked up. different jurisdiction is just a bunch of crap its not an excuse this guy has a point here.
Anarcho tyranny
video after video showing how cops always pick the soft targets
So we have a policy where we can mute body cameras that we control and that we can audit/blur out any information before submitting it for public view. Body cams should never be allowed to be changed in any form by court purposes. If it’s sensitive information, I’m pretty sure it’s not sensitive enough for a judge and 2 lawyers to view in chambers. If they can mute this when releasing it, there’s no need what so ever to ever mute body cams.
You inspire me. I am a law graduate and I live in Brazil, we don't have anything like your channel down here. I plan on one day creating a channel inspired by your to analyze the interactions between individuals and the brazilian police/civil service officials in general. Kudos, my man. God bless you. ∴
11:42 disgusting behavior from the cops. “You did this to yourself cause your wouldn’t comply, and also, we can’t read signs that are posted and don’t understand what a foreclosure is”.
Truly disgusting. Rushing up to an elderly couple and accusing them of trespassing in their own home, and then being harmed for reaching for his license.
Cops actually have the logic of an abusive spouse
Oh wait...
its irrelevent even if he was tresspassing you can't beat up an old man cause u dont like their attitude.
Might be my European point of view but he did do it to himself.
conversation could've gone like this.
cop: You are trespassing
Man: No, I live here. here is my ID and the keys to the house.
cop: there is a sign that says foreclosure
man: No thats only for the bassement.
cop: "Checks name with dispatch, goes to read sign again" OK seems fine, sorry for the inconvenience.
Situation fixed.
also shouldn't have tried to drive away and start shouting.
Also Americans so uptight about giving their ID/license to cops as if they couldn't figure out everything about you without. I will never understand
@@plzcallmymom he gave his ID. And he doesn’t need to show keys to the house. The issue was, there was no foreclosure to begin with, the cops can’t read a sign.
Muting a bodycam should be a federal crime punishable by immediate dismissal and prosecution.
It is a federal crime to tamper with evidence. But they have a badge.
It also meets the definition of conspiracy
I have an incident I'd like to hear more about. A woman in NYC was jailed for not complying when police were called to her apartment that she rented to evict squatters. Not sure if I have all the details. She kept saying "they're arresting me and taking me out of my house" Have you heard about this?
Love this channel everybody should watch it because you learn about law. I know it's a little bit boring at times but man this guy's well informed and it's good information to have
Welcome to America, where you can be arrested for tresspassing on your own property. Meanwhile, ACTUAL squatters have to be taken to court because it's a "civil matter".
Unreal isn't it!
you are on nothing by 2030 and be glad of it
I was about to say that...
squatters have more rights than actual owners
Shut up and pay your taxes, Prole! 👮
Exactly.
Any officer that mutes their bodycams while on duty should be fired and charged.
You're under arrest because you trespassed yourself from your own house, you told yourself not to return
Cop just needed to read lol
The old man is a legend!! Such a sweet man geniunely confused what whas going on but still very clear to the officers in my opinion. Hope the couple is doing good! And hope the officers dont sleep well ever again
THROWING 78 YEARS OLD to the ground without a reason and found no wrong doing? The lawsuit should extend to the chief too
the fact they looked at the video evidence and found nothing wrong must be deeply disturbing
Seriously. This psycho pig is lucky he didn't kill this guy. My neighbor was 83 and she got hurt (mysteriously. She never would tell me what happened) one night when some family I never met came to stay. She was the toughest woman I ever met and after she broke her hip she was a shell of her former self 6 months later. It was fucking heart breaking because we were very close.
Muting to Confer should be illegal. They are coming up with an EXCUSE to pin a crime on someone since they have nothing and they know they just screwed up.
Conspiracy is a crime
To me, that is evidence of guilty.
Make a video on the Chille Decastro situation por favor. ¡Gracias!
I'd love you to review the video he got convicted over
This man reminds me so much of my grandfather and his brothers. Stand up for yourself. My grandpa would always tell me it’s his right to demand a warrant if they wanted to search. Even though he was a law abiding citizen. He would have filed a law suit as well. Makes me miss and respect him even more.
The thing that kills me is that they almost always still try to charge people even when they find out they're wrong. It's inconceivable
It must be a power move because if they had just walked away they would be admitting they were wrong😡
You can beat the charge, but you can't beat the ride.
If a cop goes hands on they are required to arrest them regardless
@@roberth2833 wrong, they're just trying to cover their ass
@@Brian-bi4yj same exact thing as I said, just said in less words
@@roberth2833 "If a cop goes hands on they are required to arrest" was the part that was wrong.
On Nov 22, 2023. The Ogden Police Dept posted on their Facebook page about this incident. It read, ""The Ogden Police Department is aware of a complaint filed by Attorney Bob Sykes. The complaint is in regards to Ogden Police case 22G85110 which occurred on November 29th, 2022. Rand Briem was charged with Interfering with an Arresting Officer. The case is still pending in the Ogden Justice Court. A complete After Action Use of Force review was completed in November of 2022. There is complete Body Worn Camera footage of the interaction which was reviewed by the officers chain of command as part of our After Action Review process. The Ogden Police Department is confident that the court will find our officers use of force justified as our internal review did."" That last sentence says it all. Bunch of tyrants. The whole department.
Apart from the flagrant lie that "there is complete Body Worn Camera footage of the interaction ...", how could any reasonable person view the footage and conclude it was appropriate to put him on the ground under these circumstances? So you're correct. This wasn't just two power-tripping cops acting disgracefully. It's the entire chain of command for the department endorsing tyrannical behavior.
They should all be in jail then
“F”
@@jeepliving1 I completely agree but don’t worry, there will be a bunch of bootlickers showing up that can’t think for themselves. They will attempt to work together to develop a half-cocked narrative (if their media overlords don’t have one). Some of them are already in this comment section working it out. So far at least one goober has attempted to justify the aggressive license snatch by saying “people don’t own their license, the state does”.
Hope people in the Facebook comments asking the Police Department for the part where he was "trying to run people over" 9:06
Once they realize he's innocent, they need to find some BS charge to cover their asses. Even if they have to make a charge up.
This cop is basically saying "I can barge into your house and make sure youre the legal owner, you might be trespassing"
So many stories like this, with people on their own property. And yes, i understand as a cop, you do not know who that person is, but a simply check with their radio to dispatch, get the owners name/date of birth based upon the address, ask the person on the property their name and birth (no need to ID as its extreme unlikely that a trespasser knows the exact name and birth year/date) and done. See, how easy that is and it did not involve the need for any ID. How many people even carry their ID on them, when they are on their own property. 99% of them need to enter the home to get the ID, and then we enter the whole cops that enter with people into their homes issue.
And it's on the civilian to prove their innocences to bogus accusations.
the cops can NOT do this they are the ones actually trespasing without the permission of the property owner.
@@benjiro8793Investigation is way too much work though, it's easier to just "investigate" and let the courts figure things out with taxpayer money later
@@benjiro8793 dude I won't ever tell the cops my name, especially on my own property. They can F off.
There's no situation a cop can't make worse
Underrated statement.
Aren’t they suppose to de-escalate?
@@paulaclark2101And do you think "supposed to" matters anymore?
"Supposed to"'s throat was slit.
You don't actually even need a situation, they will just make one and then make it worse
@@MessOfThings This hit different
I feel for this guy and hope something is done.
Is it a dumb idea to call that department to tell them how unacceptable this is?
Muting to confer should NEVER be a valid argument, that is literal the most important golden part.
Muting to confer basically means we have something to hide in the discussion we are about to have. And, in court, hiding evidence should be assumed to be a criminal act.
if they have nothing to hide then there is no need to mute
Conferring is thug talk for conspiring.
seen this before but for their bosses not to see wrong in this is deeply disturbing...in the UK they would be starting long prison sentences now
*mutes body cam* "we screwed up, how do we throw him under the bus to cover our butt"
It should be a felony charge of destruction of evidence if a body camera is muted during an interaction.
100% agreed. Good episode.
This is INSANE!!!
The ironic part is if you call as a property owner and want the police to remove squatters on your property they cops won't do a thing. They always say its a "Civil matter" and walk away.
Lesson Learned: If you live in Ogden and you seriously want to prank your neighbor or maybe you want to get even with your boss then just call Ogden PD and file an anonymous complaint and let the Blue Bulldogs do the rest. Why is there no repercussions for the idiots that initiate these incidents?
Qualified Immunity. Can't read? Too lazy to do any real investigation? Impulse control problems? ADHD? Don't know any laws? Not a problem; you've got qualified immunity, just do whatever you want, you'll never be held responsible.
swatting
@@nuclearmedicineman6270Please don't use ADHD as a fucking insult.
ADHD doesn't make you be a fucking pig.
He could literally have DEMENTIA! or any illness at that age, broken rib/hip/ect from a fall, brittle bones in general, what type of loser does that ? he can’t over power a old man even if he was struggling with them? he’s gunna go home to his wife n kids knowing he abused a 78 y old before coming home.
They couldn't even finish reading the notice in plain view on the house. Those officers couldn't investigate their way out of a paper bag. Even if it hadn't been for their despicable behavior after all that, I wouldn't have wanted them on the force.
Edit: grammar
The mortgage company didn’t call them to report a foreclosure or complain that someone is trespassing at a property that they foreclosed on. They can’t take the word of someone that’s in the neighborhood because they really don’t know what’s going on with that property.
These cops are such good guys.
Show up, beat up an old man, cite the guy and take off.
All for ego trips
Real heroes here
And if you think about it. Actual crimes were committed the entire time they were harassing this man
Our justice system sucks!
And no "internal review" should be enough to exonerate the officers!
It was BLATANTLY OBVIOUS they abused that man!!! JFC...makes me wanna SCREAM!!! 😠
Serious question. How would you handle it as a police officer? “Someone made a phone call” and you have been asked by the dispatcher to attend the call.
What would you do? Tell the dispatcher that there is a person there, but I can’t legally question them? Or?
I am from UK.. just wondering.
It doesn't sound like a call that can be solved in the field. At the end of the interaction those cops don't have any clue if the house was foreclosed on or when. So they don't know if he can be there or not. Getting his ID doesn't advance that. They needed more information before arriving at the house.
They failed their investigation further when they couldn't understand the sign on the front door and took it to mean their anonymous tip was correct.
Personally, I would have simply let the man leave. After all, the supposed illegality was him staying on the property so him leaving the property should have been allowed. I would have simply written a report that I arrived at the property in question, witnessed an elderly man leaving the premises in a vehicle and finished by putting in a request to the department for a follow up visitation / investigation.
Intentionally editing or destroying bodycam footage should be a crime.
it is but will never be enforced
It is a crime. Violating the constitution is also a crime. Excessive force is also a crime. And not a single one of these cops will be charged with it because they are considered above the law and don’t have to follow to same laws me and you do. It’s a disgrace.
@@skillethead15you can thank Republicans for that.
I personally dealt with the latter recently.
Cop tried to force his way into my house without a warrant and without any exigent circumstances.
Filed a report and requested the body cam footage showing him doing it.
"We don't have any of that footage b/c officers are only required to start recording when they make contact with an individual."
I told them "So as long as there's no one looking, you guys can do whatever the fuck you want and violate any amendment you see fit and it's all gravy b/c you don't record shit. Or you probably do record it and just delete it when it incriminates you. Nice job on the internal investigation. Not corrupt at all..."
Cops are sovereign citizens.
This is infuriating. The way these officers discuss the incident exactly describes their mindset: "You took a hard fall." Do you mean when you pushed an elderly man to the ground when he tried to get his ID back after you grabbed it from him? "You tried to run us over." Do you mean when he tried to leave his property and you were standing in his driveway trespassing? Unbelievable.
ATA i think it'd be a nice idea to create some vids showing end results of these pending lawsuits with videos.
I would love to see the results of these and many other lawsuits.
Damn! You can never get cops to think 💭
Exactly.
Without an eviction notice posted these clowns have no reason to detain or arrest them.
These kinds of criminal cops need to be charged, jailed and their pensions should be forfeited to their victims.
End qualified immunity and disband the FOP.
Even if there was a notice, they can't just randomly come and remove him without the proper process
Harassing a 75-year-old man for being on his own property. This country is disgusting.
This government is disgusting. America is awesome.
Thank a republican voter near you.
@@andykrueger7564change government to Republicans and you'll be factually correct.
@@ThatOpalGuy How's that? Democrats have caused this baby like behavior with their weak on crime laws. This old man should be ashamed.
@@ThatOpalGuyoh ya because the liberal cities are safe 😂
Can you please put in the description of your videos the social media profiles or the contact information of the police departments involved?
The fact that they just grab his license without consent is so childish, shows that those 2 cops aren’t capable of being civil
We got a call.....like lighting a fuse.
Muting camera should mean immediate firing or may never be an officer again.
It should also open a criminal investigation against the officers for tampering with evidence!
Cameras need to be uploaded to the block chain.and only a4 person committy can redact.
@@keya31gville lol
Doesn't the fact you can mute them invalidate the whole point? Instead of "this is a record of everything that happened", it's literally "this is what happened minus what the cop personally cut out"
@@keya31gville The blockchain isn't a good idea. I think a simple online server is better and easier to access. Not only this but the files don't even need to be hosted on police servers themselves, they can be hosted on the Internet Archive which is the case for a lot of government documents already, like the unsealed Epstein/Maxwell documents.
Not Big Man screaming at an old lady 😂😂😂
"Alls you gotta do is comply"
The man was on his own property and had broken no law. He had no duty to identify to aggressive officers that had performed absolutely no investigation whatsoever. The fact that officers physically attacked a man in which had broken no law is testament to their lack of confirming any crime had occurred before resorting to violence. And understanding that even if that homeowner was in fact a criminal, the criminal would be set free because of a “technicality” that police had not established any reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain a suspect. It’s “fruit of a poisonous tree” doctrine.
"All you had to do was comply"
Disgusting.
When people say this I always ask them if you get pulled over and the cop says pull down your pants and bend over the hood you're going to comply right???
Sociopaths always say that.