I like the way this man makes extremely difficult concepts seem easy by always focussing on the big picture. The big picture is always important to him
@@ArvinAsh I really like your way of explaining things. You Sir are one of those guys, who are filling those big shoes left by Feynmann and other wonderful science communicators and teachers. Thank you for your passion to educate and help others to understand a little better that world around us :)
Her : The chances I go out with you are the same as me being on Mars at this very moment. Virgin quantum physicist : So, you're telling me there's a chance?
At 4:00 in describing Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Ash says it depicts that “we cannot know with 100% certainty what the position of [any mass] is”. It’s not a matter of “knowing”. QM implies that there no such thing as absolute position to begin with till you measure it in which case the position resolves (via the apparent collapse of the wave function or splitting into another universe as per two dominant theories trying to make sense of this). This property of QM then transcends our everyday usage of “knowing” which would imply that the universe knows a truth (an absolute position in this case) that we cannot perceive, to a meta-level implication that there is no truth to begin with and that the universe creates the truth (the absolute position in this case) at the time of measurement to confirm to a probabilistic function. This is what makes QM fairly trippy.
This property of QM by the way is what freaked Einstein out. That “God” himself (the Universe) did not “know” the truth about nature at a fundamental level, and rolled the dice (conformed to a probabilistic function) at the time of measurement (which then raised the issue of what “measurement” is and who is doing the measurement and all that jazz which is the discussion around the “Measurement Problem” in QM).
Well if it ever happens that my hand passes through the wall, I bet I'll never stop thinking about it for the rest of my life. Just imagine, you make history by passing your hand through a wall! Wouldn't that be just an indescribable feeling! If you could somehow prove it, you'd probably become famous all over the world
I have enjoyed your videos for a loving time I am glad to see someone with talent that spreads understandable science on RUclips that’s finally getting the following you deserve. You have always followed up with comments and we appreciate you!
I read this, Quantum Tunneling, at my age of 15. This was while reading about how a transistor worked. This was in 1965. The mystery has been solved at last in a simple language. Thank you to Arvin Ash.
Hello my friend... I'm back sorry if I didn't follow you for the last 7 months.. since I arrived in the Philippines was very busy... Lol I have few past video to look at.. you still impressed me.. keep doing great stuff, you make it so simple thanks Arvin
Take heart. "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics" - Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in physics. You are in GOOD company. :-)
While the math behind it can be tricky, the basic derivation of tunneling in particular is not too complicated in concept. It's basically a condition we impose on the function that describes the particle (wave function). Imagine we have 3 sections: one before the barrier (section a, x < 0 with x the position of the particle), one in the barrier (section b, 0
@@shokmail3875 haha... and the more you understand, the more you will start to realize that you never understood as well as you thought you understood.
You won't thank quantum mechanics when, because of the gravity, you also "phase through" the ground you were standing on, while being punched in the face. 😅😅
@@vdiitd no because you will only “phase” through one set of atoms the ones in the guys fist each atom in the ground has its own probability of you phasing through it
You are great at explaining things simply it’s fantastic. Also love the calm demeanor.I only sub to a channels with great content and all I needed for this channel was 4 minutes. Have a blessed existence to all!
I would just like to say, your method of delivering this information makes understanding all this a lot more intuitive than how other people tend to explain this!
Have to admit, couldn’t understand this stuff for the life of me when I was still in school. But as an adult I still find interest in it and hearing it come from someone with such a respectful soft spoken voice makes it that much easier to listen to. Thanks for all your hard work Sir!
Как всегда невероятно интересно и захватывающе! Отдельное спасибо за русские субтитры. Не пропускаю ни одной вашего выпуска и всегда с нетерпением жду новых.
That is right. Another way to understand this is that the atom doesn't really "exist" in your nose. It is something that has a distribution of probability, so in a way it is everywhere.
The horizontal gate in your diagram was the situation when I entered the industry in 1983. By the time I left the industry in 2018, topologies had become so tiny that new geometric arrangements of terminals was necessary. The 'fin" type of transistor was discovered to have a much higher barrier against tunneling while consequently reducing the amount of leakage current to such minimal levels that the much more densely packed microprocessors could operate for a day on smaller batteries. The reason all that computational power fits in your smartphone is the fin transistor.
It seems to me that our day-to-day experience of interacting with matter at a classical level is akin to a user interface on a computer and the real “engine” behind it all - the code and software - is the quantum world. It’s as if classical mechanics is the computer and its operating system and quantum mechanics is the circuitry and software behind it all. We know enough to operate the computer but we don’t know enough yet to code the software and build the circuits.
@@shaunakbaradkar Simulation is a possibility or it could be something entirely different we haven’t even thought of yet. All we can be sure of is that our current interpretation of reality cannot be entirely real - as if it’s filtered - like some kind of distorted reflection or translucent projection of the truth... like as if we’re seeing the graphics on a computer screen and not all the circuitry and software behind the screen itself.
Lol I was thinking that he must have left a lot of people behind. There's a few years of high level university physics in this video. Luckily I am STEM major so I understand but yeah there's a lot he's skimming over
One of the best and richest videos of the channel, so far!!! I wonder how long it took to orderly assemble the information in a understandable way... Congrats!!!
@@Stan_144 Just reading the papers abstract and decided to stop and ask you if you had read it or are you just making an assertion? The paper does not read like a fantasy any more than any of the other accepted mainstream hypotheses. That said I do have one minor issue The author claims that the two options, Objective Reality and Virtual Reality are contradictory. While this is true in one specific reality it can't be true from the perspective of all potential realities, above and below. Unless the simulations are cyclic there should be a primary reality that is objective. Which begs the question, how was it created? Did we create the creators or are we the primary? Elephants all the way down or all the way around?
@@sagittariusa2008 If we are a simulation created by some civilization in a "real" universe, no, we would not have created them. That makes no sense. And asking the question "how would that universe have been created" is basically a non-sense question. You're assuming the universe we are being simulated in has any properties similar to our universe, which is not nessicary as it's just a simulation. The "parent" universe could have an extremely simple, logical and obvious explanation for how it started assuming it wasn't an infinite static universe in which energy is not subject to entropy, which it may have been.
@@ArvinAsh Arvin, I like you, but that's not Hawking radiation. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation Hawking radiation is when two particles BOTH appear on the outside of the event horizon, and only one is captured by the black hole.
@@prateekgupta2408 If you would like to know a little bit more on the subject, i would suggest reading Hawking's book "A brief history of time". Just a little outdated (it's from 1988), but still a great source of knowledge. Just be prepared for some headaches and rereading chapters as you go. I think i red that book once in a paper form then listened to an audiobook 2 times :) Understanding Hawking even when he is dumbing down that physics, is still a challenge :)
@@TheNameOfJesus That's just a simplified way that Hawking explained it in his book, but he knew that was not precise. That's probably not how it actually happens. Hawking's paper actually describes a different mechanism. See my video on Hawking radiation where I go into this a bit more.
@@ArvinAsh Sure there is. Its possible that every atom in your body (and some from the environment) will all tunnel in exactly the right way to convert you into a product equivalent to being immolated. Though I imagine the actual probability of those exact conditions occurring is likely even smaller than the chance of falling through the floor.
Yes, there is non-zero chance you will wake up on Mars tomorrow. There is non-zero chance you have been created with all your memories in this instant. But both are so highly improbable that you can sleep well, it just won't happen ;)
Its been suspected for some time now that QT does play a role in biological processes - Personally, I am quite convinced quantum effects led to the first cell.
Great to catch such a new video on your wonderful channel here Arvin. Best explanation of QT I've ever seen. I think I actually get it now. Wish you'd been my Science Teacher at School... 🙏👍
The number is showed is a rough estimate. It is highly likely that I underestimated, and the actual probability is even lower. The point is that it is a very very low probability.
I'll have to run this by Deepak Chopra to make sure the quantum calculations are correct. He says we create our own reality. Trump does create his own reality.
Though, the wave form of sound/vibration of your fist or ball hitting the wall will traverse the barrier and emit itself on the other side, especially in a vacuum. Have someone go into a room and close the door behind them. Have them put themselves next to a wall. Have an observer stand on the exact opposite side of the wall. Have the inside person hit the wall really hard (or with a ball like a base ball or basket ball). The outside person should hear, though muffled, a noise. If the outside person puts there palm on the spot opposite where the inside person is hitting the wall, they should feel the impact though muffled (or resisted by the wall materials). Have the outside person put a glass (open end against the wall, creating a sealed vacuum space) and put their ear against the bottom of the glass. The outside person may hear and feel the vibration better. Is it "energy" (photon, protons, electrons) passing through the barrier or is it the vibration wave (of impact and sound, the wall acting as a drum skin or diaphragm) resounding the transporting of physical energy (kinetic energy) through the wall? Unless the whole experiment is done weightless and in a vacuum, its kinetic. Because of Newton's Third Law of Physics, a person in a room in zero-g and doing an activity (hitting the wall), that person will go in the opposite direction as the transference of kinetic energy will result in an opposite reaction. So the experiment will have to be done using an active energy forms, like a photon projector or an electron collider (I highly recommend not doing that with people around) aimed at the wall and a sensor (target) being on the other side. Now what's cool, is you don't have to go to space for the zero-g and pulse shot/wave for wall penetration. There are several places all over the world that can host the experiment as energetic particles are penetrating Earth's atmosphere and "boxes with sensors in them" all the time. Solar neutrinos penetrate the Earth's atmosphere and penetrate the land into the dark-water holes where sensors called Cerenkov radiation detectors exist; a neutrino is a form of energized particle; you also have the gravitational field measuring devices (L-shaped sensor lines called LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory), www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/what-is-ligo), detecting "waves" of gravity, though gravity in itself is not a particle, but still a form of energy that can push or pull, and that kind of energy can be detected through walls.
Arvin Ash, you are brilliant. I on the other hand struggle struggle struggle to comprehend. so how is quantum tunneling and quantum entanglement related, or are they. Does Quantum tunneling make quantum entanglement or spooky at a distance possible??
Way back in ancient times, one of the problems I had on a test was to compute the probability of a Buick tunneling through a 1 ft high, 100 ft long sinusoidal bump in the road....this video brought back 55 year old memories! Needless to say, the probability was rather tiny...
1:00 The use of this "tunneling" has been used on electronics since the 1950's with Esaki Diodes, and later in Tunneltrons - - later used in experimental computers of the 1960's
Great teacher is Arvin. Thank you for your wonderful teaching methodology. I am so impressed by your teaching that I have become your student my friend.
Thank you Arvin. Another informative video. Although I know a fair bit about QM but your explanation was very educational and interesting. If you come to London and go to the Kings Cross station you'll find a half of a shopping cart buried in a wall and this has become good money maker. Tourists queue to take pictures. Keep up the good work.
On a very light note not to point out anything wrong, just wanted to express myself. When you said a ball rolling back and forth in a frictionless box, first thing came to my mind that rolling can't happen without friction. I studied Newtonian mechanics a decade ago but I'm proud that the concepts are fresh in my memory. Btw really great video. Thanks.
I like the way this man makes extremely difficult concepts seem easy by always focussing on the big picture. The big picture is always important to him
Yes, without the context of the big picture, I feel science is mostly meaningless.
Exactly, something university professors should keep in mind.
Still stunned you replied though 😍
@@ArvinAsh I really like your way of explaining things. You Sir are one of those guys, who are filling those big shoes left by Feynmann and other wonderful science communicators and teachers. Thank you for your passion to educate and help others to understand a little better that world around us :)
Professors are usually hired for what they know, if they can get published, and if they can get grants, not for how well they can teach.
Perspective is everything
Arvin is like a physicist big brother that I never had. I could talk to him forever and ever.
I can listen.
The chances of quantum tunneling a car through a wall are better than for abiogenesis
🥰
@@covenantsoul8027 What do you believe?
@@jeffhu2385 I believe God created life. How about you?
Her : The chances I go out with you are the same as me being on Mars at this very moment.
Virgin quantum physicist : So, you're telling me there's a chance?
Lol. Yep.
Virgin quantum physicist... is there any other kind?
i try to go into a comment section where someone doesnt talk about girls...never happens
Yeah but there’s some tunnels you may not want your quanta to go down
@@arpitthakur45 Dude, it's the internet and this is a video about nerdy physics stuff. What in the world did you expect for the comment section?
At 4:00 in describing Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Ash says it depicts that “we cannot know with 100% certainty what the position of [any mass] is”.
It’s not a matter of “knowing”. QM implies that there no such thing as absolute position to begin with till you measure it in which case the position resolves (via the apparent collapse of the wave function or splitting into another universe as per two dominant theories trying to make sense of this).
This property of QM then transcends our everyday usage of “knowing” which would imply that the universe knows a truth (an absolute position in this case) that we cannot perceive, to a meta-level implication that there is no truth to begin with and that the universe creates the truth (the absolute position in this case) at the time of measurement to confirm to a probabilistic function.
This is what makes QM fairly trippy.
This property of QM by the way is what freaked Einstein out. That “God” himself (the Universe) did not “know” the truth about nature at a fundamental level, and rolled the dice (conformed to a probabilistic function) at the time of measurement (which then raised the issue of what “measurement” is and who is doing the measurement and all that jazz which is the discussion around the “Measurement Problem” in QM).
It always puzzles me how fast we forget about the greatness of the universe in our daily life
Well if it ever happens that my hand passes through the wall, I bet I'll never stop thinking about it for the rest of my life. Just imagine, you make history by passing your hand through a wall! Wouldn't that be just an indescribable feeling! If you could somehow prove it, you'd probably become famous all over the world
I have enjoyed your videos for a loving time I am glad to see someone with talent that spreads understandable science on RUclips that’s finally getting the following you deserve. You have always followed up with comments and we appreciate you!
Thanks. I appreciate that.
I read this, Quantum Tunneling, at my age of 15. This was while reading about how a transistor worked. This was in 1965. The mystery has been solved at last in a simple language. Thank you to Arvin Ash.
Hello my friend... I'm back sorry if I didn't follow you for the last 7 months.. since I arrived in the Philippines was very busy... Lol I have few past video to look at.. you still impressed me.. keep doing great stuff, you make it so simple thanks Arvin
Welcome back!
Coincidentally, non-zero is also the odds of me ever understanding quantum mechanics.
Non-Zero, so at least you have a chance lol.
Keep trying. High school dropout here, you can get to understand this stuff. Keep reading, keep exploring.
Take heart. "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics" - Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in physics. You are in GOOD company. :-)
While the math behind it can be tricky, the basic derivation of tunneling in particular is not too complicated in concept. It's basically a condition we impose on the function that describes the particle (wave function). Imagine we have 3 sections: one before the barrier (section a, x < 0 with x the position of the particle), one in the barrier (section b, 0
@@shokmail3875 haha... and the more you understand, the more you will start to realize that you never understood as well as you thought you understood.
I'm going to watch this a bunch more times and wait for some of it to tunnel into my skull.
😊 Good humor
And did your experiment work?
It helps to play it slower than normal. At least it did for me. Cheers
The probability that it will work depends on how thick the barrier is 😄
As the saying goes,-"repation brings retention "!!!
Bro imagine u get in a fight and the other guy's punch just phases through you and ur like: "Thank you quantum mechanics"
Get this man more likes
You won't thank quantum mechanics when, because of the gravity, you also "phase through" the ground you were standing on, while being punched in the face. 😅😅
@@vdiitd no because you will only “phase” through one set of atoms the ones in the guys fist each atom in the ground has its own probability of you phasing through it
that's how vision works
What if his fist gets stuck in your skull
Blessing us with quality content on a Saturday!
Wow, Arvin, you explain complex subjects so clearly. Thank you!
You are great at explaining things simply it’s fantastic. Also love the calm demeanor.I only sub to a channels with great content and all I needed for this channel was 4 minutes. Have a blessed existence to all!
I love you when you say "the explanation is coming up right after this" and thank you for adding arabic language in translation❤❤❤
Arvin's explanations are incredible. I like that he does not dumb it down ignoring theoretical foundations. I am very appreciative of this approach.
Thank you for this enlightening video, Arvin.
I would just like to say, your method of delivering this information makes understanding all this a lot more intuitive than how other people tend to explain this!
you nailed it again... no doubt about this channel: one of the best on internet.
Have to admit, couldn’t understand this stuff for the life of me when I was still in school. But as an adult I still find interest in it and hearing it come from someone with such a respectful soft spoken voice makes it that much easier to listen to. Thanks for all your hard work Sir!
" Universe may be born by itself "
We should be independent
------ mr.universe
Thanks for all the videos. All are incredible! Thanks for teaching like you do
Finally, a good explanation of how Homer Simpson was walking through the walls of a Japanese house.
L
😅
Another great video. Thanks Arvin for all the effort!
U’re the BEST Thanks from France
Thank God you uploaded . Was waiting for this for so long! You are the best . Keep it up 👍👍👍
Как всегда невероятно интересно и захватывающе! Отдельное спасибо за русские субтитры. Не пропускаю ни одной вашего выпуска и всегда с нетерпением жду новых.
Я рад слышать это. Дайте мне знать, в каких еще видео вы хотите включить русские субтитры.
@@ArvinAsh
Гугл переводчик: я рад помочь вам, сэр
Thanks!
many thinks!
So that means there's a possibility than an entire atom of let's say my nose can be mesured and then it appears on mars? that's so cool.
That is right. Another way to understand this is that the atom doesn't really "exist" in your nose. It is something that has a distribution of probability, so in a way it is everywhere.
Yes. It actually does appear on Mars in a parallel word in multiple world theory.
no your atoms of nose can tunnel through selena gomez and detect what she is wearing
@@teacupxcupx902 finally a useful scientific fact
@@greytroll1632 kind of sounds like the single electron theory
The horizontal gate in your diagram was the situation when I entered the industry in 1983. By the time I left the industry in 2018, topologies had become so tiny that new geometric arrangements of terminals was necessary. The 'fin" type of transistor was discovered to have a much higher barrier against tunneling while consequently reducing the amount of leakage current to such minimal levels that the much more densely packed microprocessors could operate for a day on smaller batteries. The reason all that computational power fits in your smartphone is the fin transistor.
Arvin is my Step dad at This Point
Bob Chelsy chill.
For real?
i watched your many videos and i can say that you are a great teacher Mr. Ash, thanks for this explanation.
Excellent Programme
U are awesome
You make the most complicated subjects very understandable. I love physics, i love this channel. Thanks a lot Arvin Ash 👏
You make me feel smart
Strange. He makes me feel stupid
The first time I understand what quantum mechanics is. Thank you sir! Best explanation ever.
It seems to me that our day-to-day experience of interacting with matter at a classical level is akin to a user interface on a computer and the real “engine” behind it all - the code and software - is the quantum world.
It’s as if classical mechanics is the computer and its operating system and quantum mechanics is the circuitry and software behind it all. We know enough to operate the computer but we don’t know enough yet to code the software and build the circuits.
That is a great analogy!
Are you implying simulation?
@@shaunakbaradkar
Simulation is a possibility or it could be something entirely different we haven’t even thought of yet. All we can be sure of is that our current interpretation of reality cannot be entirely real - as if it’s filtered - like some kind of distorted reflection or translucent projection of the truth... like as if we’re seeing the graphics on a computer screen and not all the circuitry and software behind the screen itself.
Thanks for so .. clearly ... Audio and better understanding your.... topic
Imagine watching this and understanding what he's talking about
But still there is a non zero chance
I understood it it's amazing
Lol yep
Lol I was thinking that he must have left a lot of people behind. There's a few years of high level university physics in this video. Luckily I am STEM major so I understand but yeah there's a lot he's skimming over
@@shawnscientifica7784 yeah computer science doesnt teach you this stuff
One of the best and richest videos of the channel, so far!!! I wonder how long it took to orderly assemble the information in a understandable way... Congrats!!!
Schrödinger: "Here kitty, kitty." I'm a dog person myself.
Excellent video. Thank you Arvin.
"explanation is coming up right AFTER THIS" this time - not "right now" which irritated me every time
my selective OCD is gone now, ty Arvin Ash !
That must be Mandela effect, it was always 'after this', wasn't it? xD
Awesome video! Complex concepts explained very neatly!!
*Arvin,* see the QM interpretation _The Physical World as a Virtual Reality_ by Whitworth.
Another fantasy ?
There is no book, but I found article: arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.0337.pdf
@@Stan_144 Just reading the papers abstract and decided to stop and ask you if you had read it or are you just making an assertion?
The paper does not read like a fantasy any more than any of the other accepted mainstream hypotheses.
That said I do have one minor issue The author claims that the two options, Objective Reality and Virtual Reality are contradictory. While this is true in one specific reality it can't be true from the perspective of all potential realities, above and below.
Unless the simulations are cyclic there should be a primary reality that is objective. Which begs the question, how was it created? Did we create the creators or are we the primary?
Elephants all the way down or all the way around?
@@sagittariusa2008 If we are a simulation created by some civilization in a "real" universe, no, we would not have created them. That makes no sense. And asking the question "how would that universe have been created" is basically a non-sense question. You're assuming the universe we are being simulated in has any properties similar to our universe, which is not nessicary as it's just a simulation. The "parent" universe could have an extremely simple, logical and obvious explanation for how it started assuming it wasn't an infinite static universe in which energy is not subject to entropy, which it may have been.
@@DBZHGWgamer I knew it didn't make sense when I wrote it. My tongue was being pressed against my cheek at the time. 😏
Very easy comprehensive presentation. Thanks a lot.
Photosynthesis is supposed to use quantum tunnelling. 100% efficiency in photon energy capture.
Photosynthesis is far from 100% efficiency. C4 carbon fixation plants, which are the ones with a higher efficiency, has an efficiency of 4.5%
Another great video from this channel.
Waiting Anxiously
For what?
Excellent video Arvin!
I love how simply (if you can call it that, haha) Arvin explains these quantum concepts. SO COOL.
Amazing videos! Greatly made and explained in details. Thank you!
To life, the universe and everything ;)
And good bye and thank you for all the fishes....
I really love the way he teaches...! Thank you very much sir for the astonishing videos you provide.
What if there is a particle at the edge of the event horizon inside a black hole. Can it Tunnel outside the Black hole
That's one theory about how Hawking radiation works.
@@ArvinAsh okay, thanks
@@ArvinAsh Arvin, I like you, but that's not Hawking radiation. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation Hawking radiation is when two particles BOTH appear on the outside of the event horizon, and only one is captured by the black hole.
@@prateekgupta2408 If you would like to know a little bit more on the subject, i would suggest reading Hawking's book "A brief history of time".
Just a little outdated (it's from 1988), but still a great source of knowledge. Just be prepared for some headaches and rereading chapters as you go. I think i red that book once in a paper form then listened to an audiobook 2 times :) Understanding Hawking even when he is dumbing down that physics, is still a challenge :)
@@TheNameOfJesus That's just a simplified way that Hawking explained it in his book, but he knew that was not precise. That's probably not how it actually happens. Hawking's paper actually describes a different mechanism. See my video on Hawking radiation where I go into this a bit more.
well explained sir, really big fan of your work. keep spreading knowledge
I'm curious!
Fb: #lock3dinthesh3d for more quantum
That's what makes us human, and it's good :)
BEST YT CHANNEL EVER
Well another amazing video by the 1 and Only “Arvin ash”🙌🙌🙌🙌
Mr. Ash, I tip all of my trillions of hats to you ! From Taiwan, Winston Chang . Thanks !
a universe that while expanding contracts simultaneously
👍Thanks, Arvin. Outstanding, as usual.
Are you saying there is a non-zero chanse that I will colapse in to dust as I write th
No. but there is non zero chance that you fall straight through the floor.
@@ArvinAsh OK
@@ArvinAsh Sure there is. Its possible that every atom in your body (and some from the environment) will all tunnel in exactly the right way to convert you into a product equivalent to being immolated.
Though I imagine the actual probability of those exact conditions occurring is likely even smaller than the chance of falling through the floor.
You made it very easy to understand. I watched other videos on quantum tunneling but they make it very confusing and hard to understand.
Basically, whenever there is a singularity like this, it means the entire law is false and we need a new one.
Well, they do redefine nothing to make it work, so.....
Arvin Ash, the Best teacher ever 👏🏻
does that mean that there is a non zero chance that i could fall through the earth to the other side
Yes, there is non-zero chance you will wake up on Mars tomorrow. There is non-zero chance you have been created with all your memories in this instant.
But both are so highly improbable that you can sleep well, it just won't happen ;)
yes it is, but don't worry, it is less then a probability of creating another universe... probably ;)
This is a great video that explains both Schrödinger's wave equation and quantum tunneling in an understandable way with a mathematical model.
At least it is the key to communication _across the whole universe in zero time._
Hmm? Time is vertically layered....So is Know? No Time!
Thanks Bob
No, tunneling is not instantaneous and can't overcome the light speed limit.
@@wasd____ Hmm? Check out “Unlimited” Which has to be. Spontaneous! Whoops did you see that?
Thanks for 'splaining Arvin. It all makes perfect sense now.
Its been suspected for some time now that QT does play a role in biological processes - Personally, I am quite convinced quantum effects led to the first cell.
Sure... and by sheer dumb luck too... lol Too bad nobody can replicate that... lol
Great to catch such a new video on your wonderful channel here Arvin. Best explanation of QT I've ever seen. I think I actually get it now. Wish you'd been my Science Teacher at School... 🙏👍
did anybody ever check how many electrons get through the barrier, to see if the statistics are correct?
The number is showed is a rough estimate. It is highly likely that I underestimated, and the actual probability is even lower. The point is that it is a very very low probability.
Oh the itch you scratched with that question could’ve haunted me for years.
Your videos are always informative
I hit like so fast my finger tunneled through my phone no bs😂
Too much kinetic energy put in that "hit". Remember, press it gently and you don't have to worry that much about tunelling ;)
Haha!
Your video is an amazing and hopeful message about life and existence. Really deep
Must know key to life and the universe - please don't say 42.
43
Nine times six...
ruclips.net/user/Thoughty2videos
Amazing! I really enjoy going through the math. The plots were also great.
I'll have to run this by Deepak Chopra to make sure the quantum calculations are correct. He says we create our own reality. Trump does create his own reality.
Amazing video! Very interesting stuff
So where are you?
Electron: yes
electron: *teleports behind you*
You: nanai?
Every single video makes me want to slap that like button.
Meow
Erwin Schrodinger, is that you?
Great content, amazing soundtrack 👌
I just love the intro music. It's Dark Synth Retrowave by Oleksandr Koltsov
Thank you sir. Quantum tunneling was difficult concept to understand for me. Now i have got it. Please make your upcoming episode on supersymmetry.
Love it, as always thanks for the video
Thanks!!! This video explained a lot for me!!!
Another great video Sir.
...an epiphany...you are one incredible Teacher!
Though, the wave form of sound/vibration of your fist or ball hitting the wall will traverse the barrier and emit itself on the other side, especially in a vacuum. Have someone go into a room and close the door behind them. Have them put themselves next to a wall. Have an observer stand on the exact opposite side of the wall. Have the inside person hit the wall really hard (or with a ball like a base ball or basket ball). The outside person should hear, though muffled, a noise. If the outside person puts there palm on the spot opposite where the inside person is hitting the wall, they should feel the impact though muffled (or resisted by the wall materials). Have the outside person put a glass (open end against the wall, creating a sealed vacuum space) and put their ear against the bottom of the glass. The outside person may hear and feel the vibration better. Is it "energy" (photon, protons, electrons) passing through the barrier or is it the vibration wave (of impact and sound, the wall acting as a drum skin or diaphragm) resounding the transporting of physical energy (kinetic energy) through the wall? Unless the whole experiment is done weightless and in a vacuum, its kinetic. Because of Newton's Third Law of Physics, a person in a room in zero-g and doing an activity (hitting the wall), that person will go in the opposite direction as the transference of kinetic energy will result in an opposite reaction. So the experiment will have to be done using an active energy forms, like a photon projector or an electron collider (I highly recommend not doing that with people around) aimed at the wall and a sensor (target) being on the other side. Now what's cool, is you don't have to go to space for the zero-g and pulse shot/wave for wall penetration. There are several places all over the world that can host the experiment as energetic particles are penetrating Earth's atmosphere and "boxes with sensors in them" all the time. Solar neutrinos penetrate the Earth's atmosphere and penetrate the land into the dark-water holes where sensors called Cerenkov radiation detectors exist; a neutrino is a form of energized particle; you also have the gravitational field measuring devices (L-shaped sensor lines called LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory), www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/what-is-ligo), detecting "waves" of gravity, though gravity in itself is not a particle, but still a form of energy that can push or pull, and that kind of energy can be detected through walls.
Arvin Ash, you are brilliant. I on the other hand struggle struggle struggle to comprehend. so how is quantum tunneling and quantum entanglement related, or are they. Does Quantum tunneling make quantum entanglement or spooky at a distance possible??
Way back in ancient times, one of the problems I had on a test was to compute the probability of a Buick tunneling through a 1 ft high, 100 ft long sinusoidal bump in the road....this video brought back 55 year old memories! Needless to say, the probability was rather tiny...
love your vids! pls continue doing this
1:00 The use of this "tunneling" has been used on electronics since the 1950's with Esaki Diodes, and later in Tunneltrons - - later used in experimental computers of the 1960's
Fantastic explanation!
Great teacher is Arvin. Thank you for your wonderful teaching methodology. I am so impressed by your teaching that I have become your student my friend.
Wonderful!
Thank you Arvin. Another informative video. Although I know a fair bit about QM but your explanation was very educational and interesting. If you come to London and go to the Kings Cross station you'll find a half of a shopping cart buried in a wall and this has become good money maker. Tourists queue to take pictures. Keep up the good work.
On a very light note not to point out anything wrong, just wanted to express myself. When you said a ball rolling back and forth in a frictionless box, first thing came to my mind that rolling can't happen without friction. I studied Newtonian mechanics a decade ago but I'm proud that the concepts are fresh in my memory. Btw really great video. Thanks.
Honors to you Sir Arvin, greater kind of teacher you are in the view of humans and greater kind of energy you are w.r.t the Cosmos.
excellent! i love everything about your show.