Oxford Calculus: Jacobians Explained

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • University of Oxford mathematician Dr Tom Crawford explains how to calculate the Jacobian for a 2D coordinate change and applies the general formula to polar coordinates.
    Test yourself with some exercises on calculating Jacobians for parabolic, hyperbolic and spherical polar coordinates with this FREE worksheet in Maple Learn: learn.maplesof...
    We begin with a discussion of when it is appropriate to change coordinates in an integral and how area calculations work in general. This is then exemplified with the unit circle and switching from Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates where the Jacobian - or ‘stretch factor’ - is given by r.
    We then derive the general formula for a 2D Jacobian using a geometrical approach and the deformation of a rectangle to a parallelogram. Finally, the general formula is used to verify the earlier result of the area of the unit circle being equal to pi.
    Check your working using the Maple Calculator App - available for free on Google Play and the App Store.
    Android: play.google.co...
    Apple: apps.apple.com...
    Other videos in the Oxford Calculus series can be found here: • Oxford Calculus
    Finding critical points for functions of several variables: • Oxford Calculus: Findi...
    Classifying critical points using the method of the discriminant: • Oxford Calculus: Class...
    Partial differentiation explained: • Oxford Calculus: Parti...
    Second order linear differential equations: • Oxford Mathematics Ope...
    Integrating factors explained: • Oxford Calculus: Integ...
    Solving simple PDEs: • Oxford Calculus: Solvi...
    Find out more about the Maple Calculator App and Maple Learn on the Maplesoft RUclips channel: / @maplesoft
    Produced by Dr Tom Crawford at the University of Oxford. Tom is an Early-Career Teaching and Outreach Fellow at St Edmund Hall: www.seh.ox.ac....
    For more maths content check out Tom's website tomrocksmaths....
    You can also follow Tom on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram @tomrocksmaths.
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    Get your Tom Rocks Maths merchandise here:
    beautifulequat...

Комментарии • 375

  • @TomRocksMaths
    @TomRocksMaths  3 года назад +58

    Check out the full 'Oxford Calculus' series here: ruclips.net/p/PLMCRxGutHqflZoTY8JCm1GRzCdGXvZ3_S

    • @THEMATT222
      @THEMATT222 3 года назад +1

      👍👍👍

    • @ranam
      @ranam 3 года назад +1

      the jacobian has an rate of scaling under transformation and jacobians are the true derivative and finding the correct scaling factors from determinants to make the explosion in Riemannian rectangles of the integrals the error converges with infinite sum so the scaling factor is there to rectify the error rate in convergence in rectangles under transformation the rectangles explode and contract and at miniature scale the each point under transformation has the scaling factor

  • @shashwatkumar6536
    @shashwatkumar6536 3 года назад +316

    You're exactly like how Machine Gun Kelly would have looked if he taught Calculus

  • @Hijinz
    @Hijinz 3 года назад +1

    I often did my math problems like a robot (replicating from class and not really understanding lol...)
    Thxs for the lesson, I finally understand the jacobian

  • @abbe23456789
    @abbe23456789 3 года назад +206

    Feels great to know why the Jacobian comes into the calculations when switching coordinate systems. I never learned that while doing multivariate calculus this past semester. Keep up the good work! Regards from a fellow math nerd from Sweden.

    • @SquidBeats
      @SquidBeats 3 года назад

      Jesus Christ is God Almighty, The everlasting Father !

    • @sachin-mavi
      @sachin-mavi 3 года назад

      Its multivariable calculus, not multivariate calculus.
      there is a difference ...
      rest everything is affirmative ...

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI 2 года назад +6

      @@sachin-mavi multivariable and multivariate calculus are the same thing yo uoaf

    • @bb5k947
      @bb5k947 Год назад

      🤓

    • @bb5k947
      @bb5k947 Год назад

      @@SquidBeats amen

  • @dmc-au
    @dmc-au 3 года назад +58

    I brushed across the Jacobian while learning statistics recently. It seemed reasonable that we'd need to scale by the change of space in that context, but this video made it concrete as to what was going on behind the scenes. Thanks, Tom!

  • @davidgillies620
    @davidgillies620 3 года назад +22

    This really should be taught at A-level rather than first-year undergrad courses. Jacobians act as a nice sliproad onto the main highway of tensors and differential geometry in general, whose introduction is in turn often delayed (or even omitted) at bachelor's level.

  • @megistone
    @megistone Год назад +19

    I'm shocked how you've packed many topics such as vector product, Jacobian, areas, and more into such a video, while clearly explaining Jacobian, the main topic. Even if I don't speak English well I can understand it and it is very interesting to watch the explanation and behavior as if you are transmitting energy to the viewer. I'm very satisfied.

  • @leocheung2578
    @leocheung2578 Год назад +14

    Hey there! The second you explained the Jacobian as the stretch factor of converting from one coordinate system to another, I understood it so much better! This was so much better of an explanation than my textbook

  • @Deviated88
    @Deviated88 3 года назад +14

    I envy the ability to be good and understand math, I’m doing intermediate algebra right now in college and I’m having a hard time grasping the concept. Love your videos, keep it up!

  • @anirudhsilverking5761
    @anirudhsilverking5761 3 года назад +6

    New album dropping soon?

  • @prille09
    @prille09 3 года назад +14

    I love your explainations, I now have a better understanding of what I’ve learned in the past 😊 thanks so much for your videos

  • @sabzimatic
    @sabzimatic Год назад +4

    Today I understood what Jacobian really means. Thank you.

  • @nareshmehndiratta
    @nareshmehndiratta 3 года назад +9

    congratulatons, please make use of maths in simplifying the wonders of theoretical physics

  • @RC32Smiths01
    @RC32Smiths01 3 года назад +37

    Thank you for always providing such valuable learning content!

  • @AcryllixGD
    @AcryllixGD Год назад +5

    This is such a fantastic video! I'm currently in year 13, thinking of doing a maths degree, im fascinated with calculus, its by far my favourite aspect of maths, not only did multivariable integration make sense but also the use of determinants. Amazing video!

  • @paulmcghee6160
    @paulmcghee6160 3 года назад +12

    Thanks for your exceptional work Tom. I've got a degree in maths and still learning little things like this really makes sure I keep lifting my knowledge.
    You're putting a load of effort into these videos. It is greatly appreciated.

  • @sarkiskaralian1765
    @sarkiskaralian1765 3 года назад +7

    You sir are a very valuable math resource for students and perhaps even teachers. Thank you!

  • @Stand_Up_Guys
    @Stand_Up_Guys 3 года назад +1

    I used πr^2 but that's probably a little advanced for you.

  • @mitchellsteindler
    @mitchellsteindler 3 года назад +7

    8 years after taking calculus, I finally understand wtf a jacobian is. Teachers have so little empathy for that their students don't ALREADY know this stuff, that they forget to try and really explain it. "Oh just make it r dr dtheta because that's you transform from rectangular to polar". What?

    • @tetrabromobisphenol
      @tetrabromobisphenol 3 года назад

      The sign of a true master is humility. Those who feel the need to belittle students or obfuscate ideas are not intellectual heavyweights. The real masters are putting their efforts into solving serious problems and winning Fields Medals, not wasting their time flexing on undergrads.

    • @mitchellsteindler
      @mitchellsteindler 3 года назад

      @@tetrabromobisphenol I'm talking about high school. Nobody was flexing on anybody...

    • @MarcAntoine1
      @MarcAntoine1 3 года назад

      As an engineering student I can totally relate to this

  • @likithstochastic
    @likithstochastic 3 года назад +8

    Thanks! That was explained in an intuitive way. I guess the key here is to think of the elemental rectangular areas changing in to rotated parallelograms during the coordinate transformation. The example you gave in the beginning with regard to the area of the circle makes the concept clearer.

  • @erikross-rnnow5517
    @erikross-rnnow5517 3 года назад +22

    Whenever I encounter double integrals of some version of the unit circle I’ve always been frustrated by the sudden appearance of the r term in rdrdtheta. But thanks to your wonderful explanation It finally begins to make a little sense :))

    • @Rene_Christensen
      @Rene_Christensen 3 года назад +2

      The further you go out radially, the bigger the area you sweep for a given angle.

  • @abdulrahmanmahmoudanter8829
    @abdulrahmanmahmoudanter8829 2 года назад +2

    Using the differential approximation of x,y as functions os r and theta I think of the Jacobian matrix as the linear transformation that acts upon the space of dr and dtheta and the determinant of it as the stretch factor, I don't know if this is the formal way but i like it 😂

  • @facr
    @facr 3 года назад +6

    And this works so well also for triple integrals and volume calculations. Nice video. Greets!

  • @science-therealfun4765
    @science-therealfun4765 3 года назад +6

    This video is too good. So informative and he explained such a difficult calculation so easily. Hats off and keep it up.Thanks Tom👍❤

  • @ian-haggerty
    @ian-haggerty 2 года назад +1

    Defining basis vectors as the rate of change of position vector would make this clearer: i = dR / dx, j = dR / dy, dA = |(dx * i) x (dy * j)|. The Jacobian naturally springs up when considering change of coordinates under these definitions. You don't need to rely on cartesian and the area element is well defined.

  • @boukharroubamediane119
    @boukharroubamediane119 3 года назад +2

    Nicely and clearly explained.
    To be grateful to your video, I thank you, subscribe, like and share.👍

  • @saraswatasensarma6041
    @saraswatasensarma6041 2 года назад +3

    Thank you so much. I am a first year Maths student from India, and these simple yet beautiful concepts are what keep mathematics in my heart. Keep up the great work Sir!!

  • @kevindegryse9750
    @kevindegryse9750 3 года назад +4

    I already knew how to use change of coordinates and Jacobian. But it is actually the first time I understand the geometric meaning of it :)
    Thank you

  • @daniellund3840
    @daniellund3840 2 года назад +4

    Absolutely love this video, currently in the process of studying vector calculus (and some other stuff I also don't understand) for machine learning and struggled to wrap my head around jacobian's, this makes so much more sense now

  • @nestorv7627
    @nestorv7627 3 года назад +2

    Instead of giving a vague argument for approximating the curvy rectangle in polar as a "normal" rectangle, you could've simply derived the area for an annular sector:
    The area of an annulus is
    A = π(b² - a²), b>a
    So that the area of an annular sector is
    A = π(b² - a²) × θ/2π
    Now let a=r, b=r + dr, and θ -> dθ
    Which gives the area of an infinitesimal annular sector:
    dA = [(r + dr)² - r²] dθ /2 = (r² +2r dr + dr² - r²) dθ = r dr dθ

  • @jeffersonluizbento20
    @jeffersonluizbento20 3 года назад +4

    Excelente explicação. Foi a primeira vez que vi Jacobiano explicado de forma tão simples.

  • @jpmagnos
    @jpmagnos 2 года назад +3

    You really are saving me in university... I feel like I can understand where things comes from and why they are the way they are when you explain it... much better than my university professor who is more interested in making us fail class

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI 2 года назад +2

      This is super funny, because this is literally just out of the textbook. Maybe if you oafs read the textbook, you'd learn something. I tutor math and physics, and people say the same thing to me. "You make it so much easier than the professor, and you actually explain where it comes from!"
      This jacobian 'proof' is straight out of any Calculus textbook

  • @starsun7455
    @starsun7455 3 года назад +5

    I always feel grateful for sharing your high-level lectures on RUclips. you are cool.

  • @Paraglasses
    @Paraglasses 3 года назад +1

    This guy looks like Machine Gun Kelly if he became a math major.

  • @dv5855
    @dv5855 3 года назад +3

    What a mesmerizing presentation. I had math through differential equations at university thirty-five years ago. If you had given lectures, such as you present here, perhaps the 4.0 GPA achieved would had met something. Grade Inflation was in full bloom. Thank you.

  • @someonethereto
    @someonethereto 3 года назад +3

    A Mathematician With a Strong style. (#Breaking_all_the_Stereotypes)

  • @codeplaysgames7681
    @codeplaysgames7681 3 года назад +3

    Me as a kid seeing this: I wanna be him.
    Friends: Why?
    Me as a kid: He sounds cool.

  • @thegrandmuftiofwakanda
    @thegrandmuftiofwakanda 3 года назад +2

    Looks like Boris has missed a few meals recently...

  • @jamesjohnson2394
    @jamesjohnson2394 3 года назад +3

    Tom I really like your videos. You're taking complex ideas and really explaining them clearly and you're very good at presenting!. Thank you for taking the time in doing them! they're very helpful!
    I'd say you're very good at this so keep up the great work! :)

  • @timothywilliams8530
    @timothywilliams8530 3 года назад +3

    your hair is fantastic!

  • @chordssongs7046
    @chordssongs7046 3 года назад +2

    Great explanation. I'd want to ask a question about the area ( 23:40 ) , I think you miss to put absolute value, it means
    Area = | Xu δu Yv δv - Xv δv Yu δu |

  • @Hackers-wrld
    @Hackers-wrld Год назад +1

    I see MGK has had a career change, respect to Eminem. The gift that keeps on giving. Now we have a good math lecture.

  • @gossipGirlMegan
    @gossipGirlMegan Год назад +1

    hi,professor,very helpful and very straightfoward, many thanks to you ,great expaination!!!

  • @Fomalhaut0802
    @Fomalhaut0802 3 года назад +2

    Nice explainings! Huge thanks and greetings from Spain!

  • @carterhall2653
    @carterhall2653 3 года назад +1

    Whats happened to the world? There was a time when Professors from Oxford were uptight looking and well groomed 🤦‍♂️🤣jk

  • @pazzy768
    @pazzy768 3 года назад +3

    loving the hair my guy #MakeEmoGreatAgain

  • @ChandrasegaranNarasimhan
    @ChandrasegaranNarasimhan 19 дней назад

    Thank you. I always wondered what jacobian was. The geometric explanation was beautiful.

  • @Ethan-de5kt
    @Ethan-de5kt Год назад +1

    Is this related to the jacobian in robotics? What would we do differently if we knew the new coordinate frame was only a rotation of the previous and not a scale?

  • @geoellinas
    @geoellinas 3 года назад +10

    This teacher when he can not have a blackboard, then does the geometry on his body! However, he teaches very well.

    • @00blaat00
      @00blaat00 3 года назад

      I take offense to your use of 'however' here. It implies that Tom should be bad at maths because he has tattoos. 'But lo and behold, for as inked as this monster of a man was, calculate he could!'.
      If you'd left out the word entirely, your preconceptions of a tattooed person would not have shone through.

    • @geoellinas
      @geoellinas 3 года назад

      @@00blaat00 I personally do not like tattoos. I see no reason for anyone to damage their skin. But everyone's decision is his own.

  • @nahuelleiva8460
    @nahuelleiva8460 3 года назад +1

    Nice video. I remember studying the Jacobian and the conversion from cartographic to polar coordinates during my degree career, good times. I remember too that these concepts could be applied to Physics but that was another thing that I didn't engage with haha

  • @uselessstuff3133
    @uselessstuff3133 3 года назад +1

    Jacobian is the basis in robotics task manipulation, if you understand it you can almost do everything that involves speed/kinetic energy.

  • @hreader
    @hreader 3 года назад +2

    I've already got the Maple Calculator! And very useful it is, too, especially as you say for visualisation.

  • @jameshamilton356
    @jameshamilton356 3 года назад +2

    OMG! You are the best teacher to explain complex subjects.

  • @thinkingabout5641
    @thinkingabout5641 3 года назад +2

    Это было впечатляющее объяснение. Огромное спасибо 👍

  • @alvinpitti5966
    @alvinpitti5966 3 года назад +1

    NIels Henrik Abel from the future, reincarnated

  • @花火-i2o
    @花火-i2o Год назад

    Professor,your class about the jocobian is excellent,but I don't understand what does dx/du ×delta u i(j)means😢😢Can you explain it,thanks sincerely

  • @antoniofernandesdequeiroga6197
    @antoniofernandesdequeiroga6197 2 года назад +1

    Congratulation to Tom for introducing the geometrical concept of Jacobian in a very clear manner.(Brazil).

  • @henrymarkson3758
    @henrymarkson3758 3 года назад +2

    Demystifying the Jacobian in 30 minutes. Nicely done.

  • @Johnny-tw5pr
    @Johnny-tw5pr 2 месяца назад

    Shouldn't it be the absolute value of the Jacobian since in spherical coordinates the jacobian is -r^sinφ but in integrals you always take the positive of that

  • @johnchristian5027
    @johnchristian5027 2 года назад +1

    This was a great video for self learning multivariable calculus, nice!

  • @joelallieu9132
    @joelallieu9132 Год назад

    Thank you very much, Sir.
    You have achieved so great a worldly treasure that will vanish soonest, one thing is needful now and it is very urgent, that's your soul to be saved before the rapture or death. I mean you have to give your life to Jesus Christ and live a holy life before it is too late.
    Your soul matters now!!!!!! Please beware that the world will end at any time from now.....
    I pray that the Lord Jesus Christ will intervene in your case and show mercy on you in Jesus Christ's loving name!!!!! Amen!!!
    Thank you as you give your life to Jesus Christ... ❤

  • @edawgroe
    @edawgroe 3 года назад +1

    Can you recommend a good resource to explain the difference between 'd', 'cursive d', and 'delta' as they appear in these formulas?

    • @RichWoods23
      @RichWoods23 3 года назад

      They indicate (respectively) a derivative, a partial derivative and an infinitesimal change. Understanding the first and last of those is the starting point for learning calculus (assuming you already understand limits), for which you can find a number of online tutorials (I honestly can't advise on which might be the best for you, because it will depend on what you already know and how comfortable you are with it).

  • @erigor11
    @erigor11 3 года назад +1

    You should be ashamed to sell your name and, even worse, to dare to talk in the name of mathematics in such a clearly biased and improperly made bogus "study" like the one you did for Live Score, establishing Cristiano Ronaldo as the "best football player in history" using one of the most flawed maths I've ever seen in my life.
    What a shame for Oxford University to have something like that linked to them and what a shame for mathematics in general. Truly shameless, utterly pathetic... all just for money. If you have any kind of decency left and actual love for mathematics, you should get that video down. Spreading misinformation like that only goes against what you're supposed to be doing with your channel and against actual critical thinking. No one should be using their academic renown in such a negligent and disrespectful way. Reconsider your actions...

    • @h4teher0
      @h4teher0 Год назад

      what the hell? where is the actual critique? what did he do wrong?

    • @erigor11
      @erigor11 Год назад

      @@h4teher0 This is not a critique to his so called "reasoning" or "analysis" (such thing shouldn't even be necessary for anyone beyond any successful middle school studies).
      This is clearly a criticism to his lack of morals and for the lack of respect for his own field and even for the sport.

    • @h4teher0
      @h4teher0 Год назад

      @@erigor11 lol I get it, seems like you're just furious about his trendy hairstyle and tattoos, that's the whole reason for your embittered whining

    • @erigor11
      @erigor11 Год назад

      @@h4teher0 How off can someone be regarding a topic?

  • @ВадимАвва
    @ВадимАвва Год назад +1

    Excellent explanation. Thank you very much

  • @blakejohnson4834
    @blakejohnson4834 3 года назад +2

    Hi Tom. I come from practically 0 background of mathematics. I enjoy these videos however as you’re concise with your explanations and breakdown the overall operation to the basics in a sense.
    I think I may dive into mathematics at some stage and see more what it’s all about.
    Take care my man !
    With love from Australia

  • @sam-ep9fy
    @sam-ep9fy 5 месяцев назад

    your hair looks like cotton candy not trying to be offensive . and amazing teaching you helped me a lot in preparing for my uni exams . Thankss

  • @zizo-ve8ib
    @zizo-ve8ib 2 года назад +1

    Literally best Jacobian video I've seen so far (and I've been searching for a *long* time about it), just have a few things I was wondering
    1. Why do you do the u in the i direction and v in the j direction ?
    2. The very last part of the Jacobian you were writing J = (Xu Yv - Xv Yu) del u del v, and the double integral was like -> J du dv
    So I didn't really get the very last approximation

    • @RexxSchneider
      @RexxSchneider Год назад

      1. He didn't. He set x in the direction of the vector i and y in the direction of the vector j. He then set u in some arbitrary direction made up of one component of i and one component of j. Watch again from around 18:30 and you'll see that he transforms the vector i.dx into the vector (∂x/∂u).du.i + (∂x/∂v).dv.j. Similarly he sets up v in another arbitrary direction with i and j components. That transforms the vector j.dy into (∂y/∂u).du.i + (∂y/∂v).dv.j.
      2. For some reason, he needlessly switched to using the confusing notation Xu to mean ∂x/∂u, and similarly Xv=∂x.∂v, Yu=∂y/∂u, Yv=∂y/∂v. You won't be the only one confused by that.

  • @Dheeraj5373
    @Dheeraj5373 9 месяцев назад

    Well as curious student i just want to know what's your GPA in Oxford University

  • @seferkeshet
    @seferkeshet 3 года назад +1

    HE LOOKS LIKE HE WANTS TO EXPLAIN HOW FRUIT SNACK GUSHERS WORK

  • @just_another_wandering_soul
    @just_another_wandering_soul 2 года назад +1

    Amazing lecture! Thank you so much...

  • @rianby64
    @rianby64 3 года назад +1

    nice explanation! thank you so much for this video! )))

  • @manfredvonrichtofen3863
    @manfredvonrichtofen3863 8 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much, theoretical physics is soooo much easier with your explanation for the mathematical concepts ♥️

  • @CaravaggioRoma
    @CaravaggioRoma 3 года назад +1

    This is the ultimate meaning of the determinant. Stretching space.

  • @drvanhelsingz5133
    @drvanhelsingz5133 Год назад +1

    Amazing amazing stuff

  • @LucasVieira-ob6fx
    @LucasVieira-ob6fx 2 года назад +1

    This is by far the most comprehensible explanation of the Jacobian I've ever found. Nice work!

  • @christianorlandosilvaforer3451
    @christianorlandosilvaforer3451 3 года назад +1

    great!!!! awesome explanations greetings from colombia

  • @a.s.l711
    @a.s.l711 Год назад

    why cant uni lecturers explained it like he did? ii i knew, i shouldve worked harder to enter oxford and learn from lecturers like him.

  • @maxwellsequation4887
    @maxwellsequation4887 3 года назад +2

    Thank you sir for creating such a brilliant lecture ☺️

  • @zwwx2142
    @zwwx2142 3 года назад

    I just graduated mathematics is very difficult I like to learn. Bro

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro Год назад

    Jacobian in a way explain as a stretching torque producing torque for a drift in area as a tilt between xy and uv planes.

  • @اوابالخليفه
    @اوابالخليفه Год назад +1

    That is so brilliant! Thank you so much❤️

  • @thobilemahlangu2574
    @thobilemahlangu2574 11 месяцев назад

    At 11:03 wasn't the "dr" suppose to be at the end? to correspond with the integral part cause that is what we were taught. someone correct me please if I am incorrect

  • @sniperwolf50
    @sniperwolf50 3 года назад +2

    I always get my Jacobians and Hessians mixed, given that, for a scalar field, they are related by the gradient of that field.

    • @crimfan
      @crimfan 3 года назад +1

      Easy mistake to make. I think one of the easiest ways to remember is to recall that the Jacobian has first derivatives while the Hessian has second derivatives.

    • @rickdoesmath3945
      @rickdoesmath3945 3 года назад +2

      i remember it because of all the maxima/minima theorems that have something to do with the hessian

    • @crimfan
      @crimfan 3 года назад

      @@rickdoesmath3945 First order conditions on the gradient, second order on the Hessian, yep.

  • @elijahhallbasketball
    @elijahhallbasketball 2 года назад +1

    Wow I'm speechless this video is so amazing

  • @elgenelavizares1051
    @elgenelavizares1051 3 года назад +1

    Watching MGK doing math make me going crazy

  • @pyropulseIXXI
    @pyropulseIXXI 2 года назад

    This notation is so weird..... underlining vectors, no hats on the unit vectors.......

  • @arthurcpiazzi
    @arthurcpiazzi 3 года назад +2

    Best lecture about this subject I ever seen 👏👏👏

  • @sekac888
    @sekac888 3 года назад +4

    Hmm... "you have to trust me on this" (and then repeat it a few more times) does not sound encouraging if the major part of the lecture/video is to explain what the listener is asked to put thrust into. :)
    Moreover, showing how Jacobian is actually derived "is beyond the scope of this video" does not justify the title "Jacibian explained". The whole idea of a rectangle being transformed into a parallelogram comes out of nowhere, which would probably be okay if explaining Jacobians is not the main purpose here.
    Pretty sure my comment sounds negative, but that's not the goal.

  • @Zonnymaka
    @Zonnymaka 7 месяцев назад

    28:52 Question 2 is wrong. u=ln[sqrt(x/y)]

  • @SouvikCivil
    @SouvikCivil 2 месяца назад

    Very nice explanation sir,deserve more views and likes

  • @samferrer
    @samferrer 9 месяцев назад

    So, the jacobian tells some cost of coordinate transformation ...

  • @noelnakka1056
    @noelnakka1056 2 года назад

    what an wonderful explainantion by you .love you bro from india

  • @cangulec4206
    @cangulec4206 3 года назад

    Jakoben değilim. Her boku Batı Terimleri ile açıklamaya çalışmayın. Her şeyi bilmeyin. Dağılın.

  • @haroldvs
    @haroldvs 3 года назад +2

    Now it all makes sense

  • @poggamus4330
    @poggamus4330 2 года назад +1

    JACOBIANS KEEP KNOCKING ON MY DOOR.

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  2 года назад

      not sure i get the reference but i love it nonetheless!

  • @harrymason1053
    @harrymason1053 Год назад

    I hate his hair but I'll try to ignore for the sake of his teaching which is good.

  • @marspalk7611
    @marspalk7611 5 месяцев назад

    I am glad that remann and jacobian did not look like this teacher.

  • @crashandsideburns
    @crashandsideburns 3 года назад +1

    Woah, I was just talking to a friend about Jacobians yesterday. What a coincidence!

  • @billthon1099
    @billthon1099 11 месяцев назад

    Love this chap, i could easily learn from him.

  • @sabahhadhood603
    @sabahhadhood603 2 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot. An outstanding lecture.