These are really underrated headphones, the sound quality makes the Bose and Sony sound like $20 toys. If you get a chance A/B them together and it’ll really stand out. I was really hesitant to buy these because there aren’t many reviews and I didn’t trust the brand to make wireless. But wow am I impressed. People have gotten so used to bad sound quality, perhaps. The intense cabin pressure noise cancelling of the Bose QC45 is kind of impressive I guess but is it worth the loss of audio quality for that price? Not for me.
2.5 balanced input is a plus giving much better sound over 3.5 as soon as you said 2.5 input my decision was made and went straight to Amazon FINDING THEM FOR $99.00 & One Day Prime delivery
@@LeechTM Oh, i understand. Thank you! Could I get a headphone recommendation? Aroun 200, 250 bucks, something I could use for the office, for gym, errands outside and have a good mic I can use for phone calls, too? Thanks in advance
Nice review. Just want to correct a point made in the video. The Shure Aonic 40 does not support LDAC Bluetooth CODEC compared to his big brother Shure Aonic 50. Good points otherwise ! Thank you
They are available for 150€, should i buy it ? Or a much more affordable headphone, like jbl live 660nc ? ( I only dont buy razer opus cuz it only have bluetooth 4.2 so im worried about that...)
I don't see how but you're microphone. Test using this headphone was better much better than another reviewer's microphone test using the headphone. So that's a little bit confusing.
I have serious doubts here. The price is very high. The frequency range only standard 20Hz to 20kHz. But it's not perhaps the most important. They have very low sensivity - only 94,7dB. That's quite disappoining.
you do know, that 94 Decibels, is as loud as Power Mower, and long term exposure to anything over 85 Decibels will cause a Hearing Loss / damage to your ears.
@@LeechTM Well, I don't like to listen to music "at full power". However isn't it like that if the headphones are much stronger (higher sensivity) they are also capable to assure a bit better sound quality (especially at lower volume settings)?
Yes and no. I personally like the aesthetics and build quality of the 50s more, also the sound quality to my ears is better. Everything else, portability, functions, anc, and price are better on the 40s.
@@LeechTM i only saw 50s in some audio store in Warsaw but it seems that 40s are more flexible (phisically and usage-wise). Like i look for something with an extraordinary sound but also is really usable for work. 50s are a bit to big and heavy for 8 hours home office type of work. Would you agree?
I did some work for Shure, and they gave me a pair. I had no idea what I missing. Much Love for Shure!
They are making some great headphones
These are really underrated headphones, the sound quality makes the Bose and Sony sound like $20 toys. If you get a chance A/B them together and it’ll really stand out. I was really hesitant to buy these because there aren’t many reviews and I didn’t trust the brand to make wireless. But wow am I impressed. People have gotten so used to bad sound quality, perhaps.
The intense cabin pressure noise cancelling of the Bose QC45 is kind of impressive I guess but is it worth the loss of audio quality for that price? Not for me.
That was a very informative review! Looked up a review for this specific headset but gonna follow you for the amazing review 👌🏻👌🏻
thanks Anthony.
2.5 balanced input is a plus giving much better sound over 3.5 as soon as you said 2.5 input my decision was made and went straight to Amazon FINDING THEM FOR $99.00 & One Day Prime delivery
saw you on another video review of these headphones lol
@@whyjerrywhy meaning ?
Nice review man . Love it
Lovely review, thank you! Are these good for gym, too? I googled but I couldn't find a solid answer if these have any kind of water/sweat resistance
im not to keen on using these in the Gym to be honest, since these have no iPX rating at all.
@@LeechTM Oh, i understand. Thank you! Could I get a headphone recommendation? Aroun 200, 250 bucks, something I could use for the office, for gym, errands outside and have a good mic I can use for phone calls, too? Thanks in advance
Just discovered that these headphones exist. If you can, can you describe how these compare to the Bose QC35II and Sony XM4?
Hey, havent had neither the Bose or the Sony in my Studio yet.
Awesome review!
Thanks mate 👌
Nice review.
Just want to correct a point made in the video. The Shure Aonic 40 does not support LDAC Bluetooth CODEC compared to his big brother Shure Aonic 50.
Good points otherwise ! Thank you
For review 2years ago, and for to day, for ther price, its comparable with another headphone? Pick this stuff or sony mx4 headphone?
xm4 for anc.
@@LeechTM for sound quality aonic40 win ithnk?
Type of sound is bright right? Make ears feal 'sick' for medioker ears?
They are available for 150€, should i buy it ? Or a much more affordable headphone, like jbl live 660nc ? ( I only dont buy razer opus cuz it only have bluetooth 4.2 so im worried about that...)
Nearly 2 years after this review, to buy this Aonic 40 is still a good option in 2024 ?
if you can get them for around 150 Euros, then yes.
I don't see how but you're microphone. Test using this headphone was better much better than another reviewer's microphone test using the headphone. So that's a little bit confusing.
probably my sound treated studio i suppose...
I have serious doubts here. The price is very high. The frequency range only standard 20Hz to 20kHz. But it's not perhaps the most important. They have very low sensivity - only 94,7dB. That's quite disappoining.
you do know, that 94 Decibels, is as loud as Power Mower, and long term exposure to anything over 85 Decibels will cause a Hearing Loss / damage to your ears.
@@LeechTM Well, I don't like to listen to music "at full power". However isn't it like that if the headphones are much stronger (higher sensivity) they are also capable to assure a bit better sound quality (especially at lower volume settings)?
Whould You say these are better than Aonic 50?
Yes and no. I personally like the aesthetics and build quality of the 50s more, also the sound quality to my ears is better. Everything else, portability, functions, anc, and price are better on the 40s.
@@LeechTM i only saw 50s in some audio store in Warsaw but it seems that 40s are more flexible (phisically and usage-wise). Like i look for something with an extraordinary sound but also is really usable for work. 50s are a bit to big and heavy for 8 hours home office type of work. Would you agree?
Gits & Shiggles