If you’re pro Palestine or pro humanity please don’t be harsh on the brother. He is not being paid for what he’s doing on X on behalf of the Palestinians if anything we should be thankful and keep on encouraging him for what he is doing. I’m one of those who’s constantly posting on SM and it can easily take a toll on you. If he lacks knowledge in certain areas there’s always improvement for that. Let him be and stop your negative comments.
The setup and camera quality is fire allahumma barik. May Allah swt grant you success. We need many independent muslim political commentators, and social media provides that opportunity who are fighting the agenda of mass media.
He says the truth when it comes to Palestine and Syria. But I think if we really want to help Palestine - we need a caliphate. Almost all modern countries were literally created by the British. This leads to populations divided which also lead to suffering and constant war.
@@mikhailbabushkinumI think your being a bit harsh, I understand how some people would think that having a caliph would solve everything but it’s simply wrong, a caliph or a leader of any sorts are usually born out of necessity. You need a movement that lots of people who contribute towards then and only then sometimes but not always someone prominent can arise. But don’t ignore all the hard work that individuals do. I really get annoyed when a person says something like what can one person do? Look and learn history it was always starts with individuals who come together to get the ball rolling, it might not happen even in our lifetime but your meant to have hope that it will become reality.
We're not pro iran not because of sectarian issues but because iran like the west has committed atrocities against innocent people. Iran isn't against the US because they're evil and iran is righteous. But because they have separate goals and interests.
Is then the man who believes no better than the man who is rebellious and wicked? Not equal are they. We have a 40 year track record on Iran they have always been on the side of the oppressed and against the oppressor.
@@KhalerJex theres a difference in level of morality when your wrongness is limited to your neighbors vs those on otherside of world you never interacted with.
Say, “Is it other than Allah I should desire as a lord while He is the Lord of all things? And every soul earns not except against itself, and no bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another. Then to your Lord is your return, and He will inform you concerning that over which you used to differ.” ~ Qur’an 6:164
Sulaiman is good on Gaza, however, lacks the Islamic knowledge on major Islamic issues! So not surprise he’s getting promoted by anti Islam groups, they see him as someone they could use to confuse the mass about Islam!
1:03:21 what are you talking about, BASHAR did KUFFOUR, he was no longer a Muslim, there is countless proof of this, the majority of Syrians (no-alawya ) were persecuted before revolting, they did not revolt for nothing, i think he should study more this question. Bachar army turtured muslim for saying the SAHADA and not ADDING ACHAR IS g#d...
Say, Whoever is in error - let the Most Merciful extend for him an extension until, when they see that which they were promised - either punishment or the Hour - they will come to know who is worst in position and weaker in soldiers. ~ Qur’an 19:75
It is He who shows you His signs and sends down to you from the sky, provision. But none will remember except he who turns back. So invoke Allah, sincere to Him in religion, although the disbelievers dislike it. ~ Qur’an 40:14
Fuentes is absolutely a positive force. Maybe Muslims will stop worshipping George Floyd and crying about "imperialism" and "colonialism" as if we didn't do that.
The difference is that jews and Christians were allowed to freely practice under muslim lands and allowed autonomy while the opposite isn't true. The west not colonized to just simply be in power but to extract resources with no benefit to the people
@@Revolutionary1449Muslims did have imperial rule, but all the empires ruled and adapted to their location which is why it wasn't colonialism. I make the distinction because the colonizing the west did decimated the lands they conquered to the benefit of their actual homelands.
Milosevic didn’t run Yugoslavia. In 1987 he became the communist leader of Serbia, which was a federal republic in Yugoslavia. After the first multiparty elections in 1990 he becames Serbia’s president. Yugoslavia broke up in 1991.
Western society is very unsuccessful. The elite is successful. But the common person is struggling, depressed, divorced, lonely, burned out. The governments of the West have been successful at providing for the elite and that’s because of their brutal colonialism. Totally do not agree about the ethno state.
With all due respect, how is he qualified to speak about these topics? Not everyone can just speak about political affairs. And no just because you have a degree that doesn't make you qualified, every second person has a degree at this point. At most he can speak about the Tate stuff.
Many people with high-level degrees but still not qualified. I think qualifications cannot be measured with degrees or diplomas. What have these qualified politicians done to the entire world?
@@prop_co What do you mean? I always find what you guys do superb. I didn’t find the comment pleasing that’s why I responded. I am sorry I didn’t mean to downgrade your efforts in anyway just the cruelty provoked me.
We have seen qualified politicians dissapointing us with their dishonest answers. Good that this channel bringing people and discussing these important topics without zionism propagandas.. We r done with zionism propagandists at this point.
When it comes to the difference between saying j or zionist. America has domestic issues which are being caused overwhelmingly by that one group and they aren't all zionists. From a Muslim perspective you are more focused on the middle east and foreign policy issues which is why you say it's just a zionist issue. But your interests aren't the same.
His opinions about Syria are bit discomforting. I don't know if he is really against overthrowing of government or in undertones he is hopping for saudi monarchy to continue for ever. People like Suleiman and Jackson are supporting some very disturbing and shady persons.
@@QwertAsdfg-ih1ow no one said anything about that. Most countries rulers in the middle east only care about themselves or are puppets. Are you brave enough to admit the atrocities committed by Asad and iran?
@@infinitebeast5517 You and everybody who are against Assad are just Sunni islamist who mad bc Russia enter war and saved Syria from Sunni islamist.... Oh, i never said they did commit war crimes..... Thing is that people like you wont say that opposition is Sunni islamist, people who you supporting is Sunni islamist and dont act like they didnt commit war crimes, especially against all non-Sunni. You are mad bc Russia didnt support Sunni islamist, thats delusional from you (and people like you)..... V
@@infinitebeast5517it is not a "brave" position to criticize Assad or Iran. If that were the case the western corporate media and the neo-cons in DC would be the bravest people on earth. 🤣
@@elmotarealI don’t know if he does, that’s why I asked you 😂. Again, I’m only 26 minutes into the podcast. If he really doesn’t, then that would be a problem as you suggest. This isn’t a matter of belief. 😂
Well it doesn't work that way 😀 We Arabs can tell if someone is an Arab, and he definitely isn't an Arab. Learning Arabic for Islamic purposes doesn't cut it to understand what the duochbag called bashar is saying
@@elmotarealok, so you don’t know for sure. That’s my answer, thanks. I think you took my initial question like I was trying to start a debate. It was just an innocent question. 🤦🏽♂️
Hey I remember you from peace house! Whatever happened with them? I remember they were more of a social Democrat/left-populist outlet, have your politics changed since then?
Hey there Glad to have you here! Those were good days! Views have evolved since then but still retain some previously held beliefs Thanks for commenting
@@frozendilemma No. you are just brainwashed to believe that Assad is this evil Sunni genocider when all he did is fight off the salafist rebellion. And the ones who actually were peaceful protestors would never make this an armed conflict against the state. So why are u equating these two. The actual revolution never wanted to go and arm themselves. It's always been the islamists.
I think multiculturalism can work if the immigrant population assimilates, and the native population doesn’t drop below 70%-75%. There will be a correction after the right takes power.
China and India are not ethno states. China has 56 ethnic groups and 302 living languages. Han Chinese is the largest ethnic group that dominate all the other groups and Mandarin was chosen has the official state language.CV
I really disagree about his opinions on Syria, and his opinions about rebelling against the leaders. Bringing justice is a core principle of Islam, (And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice.) Anaam 115 It is our duty as Muslims to bring justice. Nabi (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “Whomsoever harms a Muslim unjustly it is as if he has destroyed the Ka’bah” Who killed the people of Syria? It was Bashar and his regime, including the support of Iran and Russia. America also got involved in creating and "destroying" ISIS. This solely falls on the corrupt leader.
Suliman really needs to live for at least a year in an arab country (excluding the gulf) to know what is about to live there, then see how it is (not worth it) to rebel against the ruler. & btw he seems to be on Hanafi madhab & surprisingly enough Hanafi is the most obvious position to oppose unrighteous leaders given Afghanistan is on this madhab & they can't stand a ruler who is not practicing the sharia let alone being evil & unrighteous
Thank you for clarifying some disinformation on Syria. I realised I was hoodwinked into the Syrian narrative early on in the civil war. You realise that Syria is only talked about from a secterian standpoint. It was a large collaboration by the same Arabs and “Muslims” who don’t dare to say a word regarding Palestine, but had no issues calling for jihad in Syria. Not to mention full western support in the form of media coverage, weapons, training and resources. Turkey played a large role in this as a NATO ally, and you can see how turkey is stabbing Palestine in the back by continuing trade. Syria was essential in the fight against Israel, and they successfully dismantled it using secterian strife and the hatred of bashar s father to fuel a civil war. Syria in fact had a very high standard of living compared to other Arab countries. It was definitely corrupt, but people did go to school for free, lived in homes and ate to their fill.
Brother, you have no clue about former Yugoslavia and Bosnia. Th 1.Yugoslavia was federation with 6 republic and 2 autonomous regions (AR), run by collective presidency from all the republic and AR and prime minister and his cabinet. You might confused Milosevic with Ante Markovic , he was prime minister, and Milosevic was running Serbia, and Serbia basically destroyed Yugoslavia, with changing constitution and annexing two AR. One of these regions was Kosovo with 95% ethnic Albanians, and Kosovo was only under Serbian rule after WWI, after they kick out Ottomans. They also captured monetary reserve around 4 billion Deutsch mark. Btw, Milosevic was deployed to work in the USA and in charge of one bank. Interior minister from 1990, Petar Gracanin went to Israel for training and all other support. Israel was supplying Serbia with weapons, and you could check Ratko Mladic diary. 2.To discuss Bosnia, you must be familiar with British and especially France (Mitterrand), how they imposed military embargo on former Yugoslavia, but was only applied to Bosnia. (God help Iran and Pakistan for their support), and they only problem was Muslim in the middle of Europe, and they gave Serbia green light for genocide. 3. Bosnia army was stopped when they were starting liberation of the country in 1995. From 1992-1995 it was mostly man hunting season on Bosnians by Serbia military and their proxies, with weapons acquired from 45 years stock piling of former Yugoslavia and from all the republics. 4. If you want to talk about Bosnia, you should also talk about how the West and USA, suspend constitution on one day last year and that day put in power minority "Vichy" government that also has close connection with UAE. You should stick to area that are you familiar, otherwise you are ruining your credibility on some issues that are you maybe correct.
Couldnt listen to this, he said significant too many times. Although he has interesting takes, the use of significant took significance and i had to shut this down. Anyone else annoyed by significant or is this something brits doo
You posted on twitter “there were many comments expressing frustration towards us for speaking about Fuentes and America First. Is it problematic to simply mention Nick Fuentes, Lucas Gage, and America First?” I don’t see any comments saying it’s problematic to “speak about” or “merely mention” Nick Fuentes or America First. I left a comment providing info/feedback on your question regarding whether Fuentes should be accepted as part of the pro-Palestinian movement, giving an unequivocal no. That’s not a critique of “merely mentioning” Fuentes, it’s a substantive answer to your question. I also draw red lines at coddling Nazis, so if your bizarre behavior continues on this front I’ll be unfollowing without hesitation
Episode 5, already love the show, Ahmad. Discourse is the way. I understand the eagerness to critique any one’s points - but let’s appreciate the fact that high level conversations like this can take place, at a time when it’s most essential @prop_co
Saying that rebeling is haram full stop is a lie or a half lie. Generally it is haram no question but in extreme situations, it is allowed. I read some papers about it. In reality There r many other views through out centuries, Differernt ways to interprete these texts. He is being academically dishonest, just like madkhalies. They do that for their arab masters, He is doing it for Basar. I will suggest dont take any Islamic ideas for him uncritically. He talks a lot but when was given pushbacks he backs down and gives a more moderate view. that is funny. He loves absulate freedom of speech for himself but dont like for syrians? suggest violent ways to supressed the protesters! how is that make any sense?
“The truth has come and falsehood has vanished. Indeed, falsehood is bound to vanish.” ~ Qur’an 17:81
I can see the improvement, the quality, and all the efforts . I am looking forward to it.
keep saying the truth , we are in you side ,
If you’re pro Palestine or pro humanity please don’t be harsh on the brother. He is not being paid for what he’s doing on X on behalf of the Palestinians if anything we should be thankful and keep on encouraging him for what he is doing. I’m one of those who’s constantly posting on SM and it can easily take a toll on you. If he lacks knowledge in certain areas there’s always improvement for that. Let him be and stop your negative comments.
So true
You must be out of reality mr.
The setup and camera quality is fire allahumma barik. May Allah swt grant you success. We need many independent muslim political commentators, and social media provides that opportunity who are fighting the agenda of mass media.
#Freepalestine🇵🇸💔
He says the truth when it comes to Palestine and Syria. But I think if we really want to help Palestine - we need a caliphate. Almost all modern countries were literally created by the British. This leads to populations divided which also lead to suffering and constant war.
No thanks- Palestine is for Palestinians only (including Muslims and Christians) stop fircing your religion on everyone.
Who will be the caliph ?
@@mikhailbabushkinumsomeone who doesn’t want to be.
@@ZK-7 People need to be realistic and not stuck in the past
@@mikhailbabushkinumI think your being a bit harsh, I understand how some people would think that having a caliph would solve everything but it’s simply wrong, a caliph or a leader of any sorts are usually born out of necessity. You need a movement that lots of people who contribute towards then and only then sometimes but not always someone prominent can arise. But don’t ignore all the hard work that individuals do. I really get annoyed when a person says something like what can one person do? Look and learn history it was always starts with individuals who come together to get the ball rolling, it might not happen even in our lifetime but your meant to have hope that it will become reality.
We're not pro iran not because of sectarian issues but because iran like the west has committed atrocities against innocent people. Iran isn't against the US because they're evil and iran is righteous. But because they have separate goals and interests.
Same as Sunni islamist
when ur on your toes 24/7 u tend 2 get jittery
There is no country who is righteous. all countries pursue interests. the thing is that Iran's interests do not encompass everyone in the globe.
Is then the man who believes no better than the man who is rebellious and wicked? Not equal are they.
We have a 40 year track record on Iran they have always been on the side of the oppressed and against the oppressor.
@@KhalerJex theres a difference in level of morality when your wrongness is limited to your neighbors vs those on otherside of world you never interacted with.
Say, “Is it other than Allah I should desire as a lord while He is the Lord of all things? And every soul earns not except against itself, and no bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another. Then to your Lord is your return, and He will inform you concerning that over which you used to differ.” ~ Qur’an 6:164
This is a glaring example of why a brother on Twitter should not be talking about politics.
Sulaiman is good on Gaza, however, lacks the Islamic knowledge on major Islamic issues! So not surprise he’s getting promoted by anti Islam groups, they see him as someone they could use to confuse the mass about Islam!
You need some meds for your paranoia.
@@keyboardwarriorsaint and you need to learn insulting doesn't refute the argument
This guy is the biggest fraudster a grifter, You should have asked him why he calls himself a Sheikh?
Nick Fuentes 💖💖
1:03:21 what are you talking about, BASHAR did KUFFOUR, he was no longer a Muslim, there is countless proof of this, the majority of Syrians (no-alawya ) were persecuted before revolting, they did not revolt for nothing, i think he should study more this question. Bachar army turtured muslim for saying the SAHADA and not ADDING ACHAR IS g#d...
Say, Whoever is in error - let the Most Merciful extend for him an extension until, when they see that which they were promised - either punishment or the Hour - they will come to know who is worst in position and weaker in soldiers. ~ Qur’an 19:75
Agree with suleiman on london muslim influencers being sectarian
They should be in jail for promoting child marriage.
Ali Dawah , Dilly and Hijab are wahhabi $çum.
@@OFFICIALRAMKO who does this?
@@minnie3906 r u drunk?
Which one?
It is He who shows you His signs and sends down to you from the sky, provision. But none will remember except he who turns back. So invoke Allah, sincere to Him in religion, although the disbelievers dislike it. ~ Qur’an 40:14
Great pushback!
Amazing interview
Fuentes is absolutely a positive force. Maybe Muslims will stop worshipping George Floyd and crying about "imperialism" and "colonialism" as if we didn't do that.
We spoke quite a bit about Fuentes and America first
The difference is that jews and Christians were allowed to freely practice under muslim lands and allowed autonomy while the opposite isn't true. The west not colonized to just simply be in power but to extract resources with no benefit to the people
@@infinitebeast5517 That's just a completely ridiculous take.
If you think the Muslim conquests were some hippy love ceremony then that's on you.
@@Revolutionary1449Muslims did have imperial rule, but all the empires ruled and adapted to their location which is why it wasn't colonialism. I make the distinction because the colonizing the west did decimated the lands they conquered to the benefit of their actual homelands.
@@infinitebeast5517 Again lies...
Milosevic didn’t run Yugoslavia. In 1987 he became the communist leader of Serbia, which was a federal republic in Yugoslavia. After the first multiparty elections in 1990 he becames Serbia’s president. Yugoslavia broke up in 1991.
Yes!!!!
Western society is very unsuccessful. The elite is successful. But the common person is struggling, depressed, divorced, lonely, burned out. The governments of the West have been successful at providing for the elite and that’s because of their brutal colonialism. Totally do not agree about the ethno state.
Like Mandela said, our attitude towards anyone is determined by their attitude towards our liberation struggle
Great podcast! #Freepalestine
Much love to this brother, it’s like he says out loud what I think in my head.
With all due respect, how is he qualified to speak about these topics?
Not everyone can just speak about political affairs. And no just because you have a degree that doesn't make you qualified, every second person has a degree at this point.
At most he can speak about the Tate stuff.
Many people with high-level degrees but still not qualified. I think qualifications cannot be measured with degrees or diplomas. What have these qualified politicians done to the entire world?
I think you’ll find this conversation to be very interesting
@@prop_co What do you mean? I always find what you guys do superb. I didn’t find the comment pleasing that’s why I responded. I am sorry I didn’t mean to downgrade your efforts in anyway just the cruelty provoked me.
@@prop_cothis guy is legit known to an extend to spread misinfo and exaggerations
We have seen qualified politicians dissapointing us with their dishonest answers. Good that this channel bringing people and discussing these important topics without zionism propagandas.. We r done with zionism propagandists at this point.
Extremely well said, need more of these!
Wow Sunnis really got rubbed the wrong way by this guys straightforwardness
Why don't you bring Lucas Gage to this Podcast?
Excellent interviews Ahmad
When it comes to the difference between saying j or zionist. America has domestic issues which are being caused overwhelmingly by that one group and they aren't all zionists. From a Muslim perspective you are more focused on the middle east and foreign policy issues which is why you say it's just a zionist issue. But your interests aren't the same.
His opinions about Syria are bit discomforting. I don't know if he is really against overthrowing of government or in undertones he is hopping for saudi monarchy to continue for ever.
People like Suleiman and Jackson are supporting some very disturbing and shady persons.
He supports the genocide of Albanians/ Muslims in kosovo but thinks we’re dumb enough to but into his excuse why they don’t deserve to be independent.
What?! You call out somebody while in same time you supporting Sunni islamist...
@@QwertAsdfg-ih1ow no one said anything about that. Most countries rulers in the middle east only care about themselves or are puppets. Are you brave enough to admit the atrocities committed by Asad and iran?
@@infinitebeast5517 You and everybody who are against Assad are just Sunni islamist who mad bc Russia enter war and saved Syria from Sunni islamist....
Oh, i never said they did commit war crimes.....
Thing is that people like you wont say that opposition is Sunni islamist, people who you supporting is Sunni islamist and dont act like they didnt commit war crimes, especially against all non-Sunni.
You are mad bc Russia didnt support Sunni islamist, thats delusional from you (and people like you)..... V
@@infinitebeast5517it is not a "brave" position to criticize Assad or Iran. If that were the case the western corporate media and the neo-cons in DC would be the bravest people on earth. 🤣
Maybe if you understood Arabic, you'd know bashar better 🤷 you wouldn't like him that much
Does he not know Arabic? I just started watching this. Does he admit not knowing Arabic?!?
What makes you believe he does?
@@elmotarealI don’t know if he does, that’s why I asked you 😂. Again, I’m only 26 minutes into the podcast. If he really doesn’t, then that would be a problem as you suggest. This isn’t a matter of belief. 😂
Well it doesn't work that way 😀
We Arabs can tell if someone is an Arab, and he definitely isn't an Arab. Learning Arabic for Islamic purposes doesn't cut it to understand what the duochbag called bashar is saying
@@elmotarealok, so you don’t know for sure. That’s my answer, thanks. I think you took my initial question like I was trying to start a debate. It was just an innocent question. 🤦🏽♂️
Hey I remember you from peace house! Whatever happened with them? I remember they were more of a social Democrat/left-populist outlet, have your politics changed since then?
Hey there
Glad to have you here!
Those were good days!
Views have evolved since then but still retain some previously held beliefs
Thanks for commenting
Prop and co with the solid content, par for the course.
Not the biggest fan of this sulayman shaykh guy though, his take on Syria was terrible lol
Absolutely disgusting take. It's Assad apologia at its finest.
@@frozendilemma No. you are just brainwashed to believe that Assad is this evil Sunni genocider when all he did is fight off the salafist rebellion. And the ones who actually were peaceful protestors would never make this an armed conflict against the state. So why are u equating these two. The actual revolution never wanted to go and arm themselves. It's always been the islamists.
He should have been asked about the behavior of arab rulers on Gaza issue?
Lol he sounds like a madkhali but for Bashar saying you cant rebel against him, pathetic grifter.
ethno state countries are not successful just tell him about china and he will lose the argument
China has to oppress multiple ethic groups in its own territories 😂😂😂
It's such an obviously bad argument I have a hard time believing that he actually thinks it's true.
I think multiculturalism can work if the immigrant population assimilates, and the native population doesn’t drop below 70%-75%. There will be a correction after the right takes power.
China and India are not ethno states. China has 56 ethnic groups and 302 living languages. Han Chinese is the largest ethnic group that dominate all the other groups and Mandarin was chosen has the official state language.CV
@@InfiniteCuriosity1210 by ethno state i mean country without huge perenct of immigrants not one race country there is a difference
Everything was fine but sulyman the entire time = Shia sunni, sunni Shia, lolzzzz 😂😂😂😂
Black shoes and white socks is criminal.
I really disagree about his opinions on Syria, and his opinions about rebelling against the leaders. Bringing justice is a core principle of Islam, (And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice.) Anaam 115 It is our duty as Muslims to bring justice.
Nabi (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:
“Whomsoever harms a Muslim unjustly it is as if he has destroyed the Ka’bah”
Who killed the people of Syria? It was Bashar and his regime, including the support of Iran and Russia. America also got involved in creating and "destroying" ISIS. This solely falls on the corrupt leader.
Yes, Assad "bad" bc he was fighting against Sunni islamist...
Suliman really needs to live for at least a year in an arab country (excluding the gulf) to know what is about to live there, then see how it is (not worth it) to rebel against the ruler.
& btw he seems to be on Hanafi madhab & surprisingly enough Hanafi is the most obvious position to oppose unrighteous leaders given Afghanistan is on this madhab & they can't stand a ruler who is not practicing the sharia let alone being evil & unrighteous
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
So basically left his PhD to do Twitter full time… ما شاء الله
Thank you for clarifying some disinformation on Syria. I realised I was hoodwinked into the Syrian narrative early on in the civil war. You realise that Syria is only talked about from a secterian standpoint. It was a large collaboration by the same Arabs and “Muslims” who don’t dare to say a word regarding Palestine, but had no issues calling for jihad in Syria. Not to mention full western support in the form of media coverage, weapons, training and resources. Turkey played a large role in this as a NATO ally, and you can see how turkey is stabbing Palestine in the back by continuing trade. Syria was essential in the fight against Israel, and they successfully dismantled it using secterian strife and the hatred of bashar s father to fuel a civil war. Syria in fact had a very high standard of living compared to other Arab countries. It was definitely corrupt, but people did go to school for free, lived in homes and ate to their fill.
This guy need to renew his Islam. He deny Hadith
This guy is a fake.
I really like this guy, but unfortunately he has fallen for Tate’s deliberate disinformation campaign regarding his case.
Yeah, when he opened with this I was disappointed but glad I stayed around. He makes some interesting points.
Türkçe altyazı lütfen
Why invite such a weird dude, did not provide any knowledge of substance whatsoever
Slugman is a loser.
Brother, you have no clue about former Yugoslavia and Bosnia. Th
1.Yugoslavia was federation with 6 republic and 2 autonomous regions (AR), run by collective presidency from all the republic and AR and prime minister and his cabinet. You might confused Milosevic with Ante Markovic , he was prime minister, and Milosevic was running Serbia, and Serbia basically destroyed Yugoslavia, with changing constitution and annexing two AR. One of these regions was Kosovo with 95% ethnic Albanians, and Kosovo was only under Serbian rule after WWI, after they kick out Ottomans. They also captured monetary reserve around 4 billion Deutsch mark.
Btw, Milosevic was deployed to work in the USA and in charge of one bank. Interior minister from 1990, Petar Gracanin went to Israel for training and all other support. Israel was supplying Serbia with weapons, and you could check Ratko Mladic diary.
2.To discuss Bosnia, you must be familiar with British and especially France (Mitterrand), how they imposed military embargo on former Yugoslavia, but was only applied to Bosnia. (God help Iran and Pakistan for their support), and they only problem was Muslim in the middle of Europe, and they gave Serbia green light for genocide.
3. Bosnia army was stopped when they were starting liberation of the country in 1995. From 1992-1995 it was mostly man hunting season on Bosnians by Serbia military and their proxies, with weapons acquired from 45 years stock piling of former Yugoslavia and from all the republics.
4. If you want to talk about Bosnia, you should also talk about how the West and USA, suspend constitution on one day last year and that day put in power minority "Vichy" government that also has close connection with UAE.
You should stick to area that are you familiar, otherwise you are ruining your credibility on some issues that are you maybe correct.
Non of this is True......
@@QwertAsdfg-ih1ow all of it is true
@@Mason500. None its true.....
Couldnt listen to this, he said significant too many times. Although he has interesting takes, the use of significant took significance and i had to shut this down. Anyone else annoyed by significant or is this something brits doo
1:05:55 / what ? allegedly, you're brainwashed
I think the Border issue is a Psyop too
How?!
@@QwertAsdfg-ih1ow To cause divisions
@@daniellacutter301There is no milions of migrants who cross border...
You posted on twitter “there were many comments expressing frustration towards us for speaking about Fuentes and America First. Is it problematic to simply mention Nick Fuentes, Lucas Gage, and America First?” I don’t see any comments saying it’s problematic to “speak about” or “merely mention” Nick Fuentes or America First. I left a comment providing info/feedback on your question regarding whether Fuentes should be accepted as part of the pro-Palestinian movement, giving an unequivocal no. That’s not a critique of “merely mentioning” Fuentes, it’s a substantive answer to your question. I also draw red lines at coddling Nazis, so if your bizarre behavior continues on this front I’ll be unfollowing without hesitation
Episode 5, already love the show, Ahmad. Discourse is the way. I understand the eagerness to critique any one’s points - but let’s appreciate the fact that high level conversations like this can take place, at a time when it’s most essential @prop_co
Saying that rebeling is haram full stop is a lie or a half lie. Generally it is haram no question but in extreme situations, it is allowed. I read some papers about it. In reality There r many other views through out centuries, Differernt ways to interprete these texts. He is being academically dishonest, just like madkhalies. They do that for their arab masters, He is doing it for Basar. I will suggest dont take any Islamic ideas for him uncritically. He talks a lot but when was given pushbacks he backs down and gives a more moderate view. that is funny. He loves absulate freedom of speech for himself but dont like for syrians? suggest violent ways to supressed the protesters! how is that make any sense?
Hey suleiman, how bout dopping significant?
Dopping?