Small factor loadings in CFA???
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- QuantFish instructor Dr. Christian Geiser discusses reasons and remedies for weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
#Mplus #statistics #cfa #sem #quantfish #statisticstutorials #mplusforbeginners #geiser
FREE weekly stats tips: christiangeise...
Get Dr. Geiser's FREE POWER ANALYSIS & SIMULATION MINI-COURSE: www.goquantfis...
FREE PATH ANALYSIS & MEDIATION MINI-COURSE:
www.goquantfis...
MPLUS FACTOR ANALYSIS COURSE: www.goquantfis...
Dr. Geiser's BOOKS:
****Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: amzn.to/3ekOLOW
****Data Analysis with Mplus: amzn.to/3eg9vY4
ON-DEMAND MPLUS COURSES:
****Mplus from Scratch: www.goquantfis...
****Multilevel Modeling with Mplus: www.goquantfis...
****Latent Class Analysis with Mplus: www.goquantfis...
GET IN TOUCH with DR. GEISER:
****Facebook: / christiangeiserauthor
****Website: christiangeise...
ABOUT THIS INSTRUCTOR:
Dr. Christian Geiser is a quantitative psychologist, author of two books on Mplus, and a leader in the development of latent variable techniques for complex data. With his accessible books and sought-after workshops, he has helped thousands of researchers and students around the world to achieve their analytic goals. Sign up for his newsletter at christiangeiser.com.
ABOUT QUANTFISH:
We bring top-level stats training from the world's leading methodologists to researchers and students all over the world. Learn more at goquantfish.com.
Some affiliate links may be included at no additional cost to purchasers.
How to interpret/read negative loadings in CFA?
What if the factor loadings are too good like .91 or .96 while others are between .80s. While the overall model fit looks decent, are 'too big' factor loadings problematic also?
If by "too good" you mean implausibly high, then you should think about your model. Loadings that are "too good to be true" may indicate model misspecification.
Best, Christian Geiser