@@aussieintexas61 first rule 18.4.1 is that ruckman who’s purpose is solely to contest the ball shall be allowed to do so or shall be awarded a free kick. 14.4.3 b - cant push or bump deliberately before contesting the football. Watch the replay, on almost EVERY contest he has in the ruck his first objective is to push the opposing ruck, and often blatantly in the back but yet somehow (Carlton paper bag payments the highly likely key reason) the umpires seem to allow it to continue despite many other rucks in the AFL regularly being penalised. De Koning by the rules gave away at least 15 free kicks v Geelong along that weren’t paid. He was the same against Essendon the game prior also.
@@aussieintexas61 go watch the first goal of the game v Geelong. Clearly not watching the ball, and blatantly shoves a ruckman. Then that’s not called but the tiniest little bit of body the other way gets called a block in the ruck lol. Carlton are such an embarrassing charity case of a club.
ngl I'm okay with dangerous tackles like dangerfields just being a free kick, no issue with it being called considering how walsh's head hit the ground. But it wasnt hard enough for a week
Only a minute or so, but at least an acknowledgement of how the Swans have destroyed this season like only 2 other teams in the history of the AFL competition (Essendon 2000 and Cats 2007). However, I do enjoy all the wishfulfilment-like, pithy, hypotheticals about [insert random team] even coming close to the Swans this year.
@@BlooBagger he definitely did. I have almost 20 years experience in sports biomechanics and human movement. There is absolutely nothing other than Walsh deliberately throwing his head downward causing that movement and anyone in the biomechanics world will tell you the same. He should be fined like May.
@@BlooBagger take a polygraph into the tribunal and ask Walsh to answer one question if he threw his head towards the ground, also, he did it twice last week and both times the umpires didn’t pay it and one even said “nah, you played for it”
![DDG & G Herbo - Nosey [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I9Ra0Zc2NlQ/mqdefault.jpg)
If Weitering doesn’t get Aa full back this year there’s something wrong with the selection committee
Lacks composure in big moments
The afl needs a brothers ruleset, if two brothers are on eachother you cant suspend or give free's against. Let them fight it out haha
TDK does amazing things....(to football)
Nicely done
that is a deep cut of australian tech!
TDK has had a very good year.. actually better than Max Gawn
Idiotic Carlton fans lol. TDK breaks the rules every ruck contest.
@@Littleyeti7 how. please explain.
@@aussieintexas61 first rule 18.4.1 is that ruckman who’s purpose is solely to contest the ball shall be allowed to do so or shall be awarded a free kick.
14.4.3 b - cant push or bump deliberately before contesting the football.
Watch the replay, on almost EVERY contest he has in the ruck his first objective is to push the opposing ruck, and often blatantly in the back but yet somehow (Carlton paper bag payments the highly likely key reason) the umpires seem to allow it to continue despite many other rucks in the AFL regularly being penalised.
De Koning by the rules gave away at least 15 free kicks v Geelong along that weren’t paid. He was the same against Essendon the game prior also.
@@aussieintexas61 go watch the first goal of the game v Geelong. Clearly not watching the ball, and blatantly shoves a ruckman. Then that’s not called but the tiniest little bit of body the other way gets called a block in the ruck lol. Carlton are such an embarrassing charity case of a club.
ngl I'm okay with dangerous tackles like dangerfields just being a free kick, no issue with it being called considering how walsh's head hit the ground. But it wasnt hard enough for a week
If Weitering doesn’t get Aa full back this year there’s something wrong with the selection committee
Only a minute or so, but at least an acknowledgement of how the Swans have destroyed this season like only 2 other teams in the history of the AFL competition (Essendon 2000 and Cats 2007). However, I do enjoy all the wishfulfilment-like, pithy, hypotheticals about [insert random team] even coming close to the Swans this year.
Gawn free kick for/against ratio getting back to the 2020 level highs again lol
Dons keep rolling 😂
Sam Walsh had both his arms pins so he couldn’t protect himself , Dangerfield was responsible and failed duty of care..
Shut up, it’s clear as day that Walsh deliberately through his head into the ground and he should be fined like Steven May.
Nah, Paddy shouldn’t get a week for that! Bloody Rubbish.
@@Littleyeti7you serious????you really think that. I don’t think Danger should go btw
@@BlooBagger he definitely did. I have almost 20 years experience in sports biomechanics and human movement. There is absolutely nothing other than Walsh deliberately throwing his head downward causing that movement and anyone in the biomechanics world will tell you the same. He should be fined like May.
@@BlooBagger take a polygraph into the tribunal and ask Walsh to answer one question if he threw his head towards the ground, also, he did it twice last week and both times the umpires didn’t pay it and one even said “nah, you played for it”