This is not Usul al-fiqh, this is Minhaj al-Salafiyyah, Salafis are weak in Usul al-Fiqh and no scholar takes them seriously. Follow Dr Hatem al-Haj if you would like to learn Hanbali fiqh and Usul al-Fiqh
@---- Sufism has nothing to do with Hanbalism or any particular madhab. Thers were many Sufis who were Hanbali such as al-Jilani. Every single imam of Hadith, Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, Thirmidhi, Nasai, Hakim, ibn Salah, Bayhaqi, Dhahabi and I can go on was not a Salafi. They were mostly Shafi'i Ashari. Ahl al Hadith is not Salafiyyah. Salafiyyah is a methodology that is contrary to traditional scholarship. Overwhelming majority of ulama of the history of Islam were indeed following a madhab such as ibn qudama who did not subscribe to modern day Salafiyyah. Salafiyyah has no scholarship, no roots except that goes back to ibn Abdul Wahhab. Ibn Taymiyyah himself was no Salafi even though his name is hijacked by the Salafis. No, Albani is not considered a Muhaddith by the ummah, only Salafis consider him to be such. Go to a traditional Alim and learn Islam through a madhab for seven years, then do mastery for another couple of years, then you know Salafis have no clue of Islam. Their scholarship is kindergarten compared to traditional scholarship. It is not Salafism against Sufism, it is Salafism against Traditionalism.
@---- that shows your knowledge. That's what all Salafis say, Salafism is to with the Salaf. I was a Salafi for decade and I know all the arguments. It is false, it is not the methodology of the Salafi al Salih. It is the methodology of ibn Abdul wahhab and the Najdi brand of Hanbalism. All madhabs adhere best to the methodology of the Salaf Al Saleh. We know, weve been there, done that. Many of us have moved on from Salafiyyah after having done advanced studies. Again, not a single scholar of moder day in Hadith science, except Salafis consider Albani to be authorative. Most scholars don't even take him seriously. That is why even Sheikh Uthaymeen himself didn't agree with most of what Albani proposed.
@---- Salafis have no Usul. No Usul of anything, not even of Akhlaq or Adhab. Salafism only appeals to people of similar mindsets, others move on, by the grace of Allah 😊
@@alayetira7915 good brother, watch the videos after you finish the usool al fiqh durus also there is between that more you can watch like umdat al ahkam before zad as well because zad should be the last one. Also for an easy book for home I would recommend you to buy the 2 volume by Dr saleh Al fawzan it’s very easy to just go back to quickly. But these series are really good also if you need anything let me know. Or if anything is confusing. You can also look at the books series.
![Sharh 'Umdah al-Fiqh 1 [Introduction-Ibn Qudamah]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2DVTYk1jVE4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Sharh 'Umdah al-Fiqh 1 [Introduction-Ibn Qudamah]](/img/tr.png)
ma sha Allah, jazak Allah khairan for starting usual ul fiqh class,
The Sheikh only did one class... May Allah strengthen him to continue the class, it is really interesting
Assalamalaikum he did make more videos on usul ul fiqh go to his videos and search from the oldest to the newest it will be easier to find
ruclips.net/p/PLn36QGHKpWzhs9dyllfqer3uTZYyUZETE
@@farhaan1924 I don’t see it.
@@servantofthemostmerciful7985 don't go to playlist rather search it in videos
@@farhaan1924 there is only six videos, I’d that, correct?
Shukran jazilan
Could someone tell me which book Shaykh is using?
Is this hanbali usul al fiqh?
This is not Usul al-fiqh, this is Minhaj al-Salafiyyah, Salafis are weak in Usul al-Fiqh and no scholar takes them seriously. Follow Dr Hatem al-Haj if you would like to learn Hanbali fiqh and Usul al-Fiqh
@---- Sufism has nothing to do with Hanbalism or any particular madhab. Thers were many Sufis who were Hanbali such as al-Jilani. Every single imam of Hadith, Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, Thirmidhi, Nasai, Hakim, ibn Salah, Bayhaqi, Dhahabi and I can go on was not a Salafi. They were mostly Shafi'i Ashari. Ahl al Hadith is not Salafiyyah. Salafiyyah is a methodology that is contrary to traditional scholarship. Overwhelming majority of ulama of the history of Islam were indeed following a madhab such as ibn qudama who did not subscribe to modern day Salafiyyah. Salafiyyah has no scholarship, no roots except that goes back to ibn Abdul Wahhab. Ibn Taymiyyah himself was no Salafi even though his name is hijacked by the Salafis. No, Albani is not considered a Muhaddith by the ummah, only Salafis consider him to be such. Go to a traditional Alim and learn Islam through a madhab for seven years, then do mastery for another couple of years, then you know Salafis have no clue of Islam. Their scholarship is kindergarten compared to traditional scholarship. It is not Salafism against Sufism, it is Salafism against Traditionalism.
@---- that shows your knowledge. That's what all Salafis say, Salafism is to with the Salaf. I was a Salafi for decade and I know all the arguments. It is false, it is not the methodology of the Salafi al Salih. It is the methodology of ibn Abdul wahhab and the Najdi brand of Hanbalism. All madhabs adhere best to the methodology of the Salaf Al Saleh. We know, weve been there, done that. Many of us have moved on from Salafiyyah after having done advanced studies. Again, not a single scholar of moder day in Hadith science, except Salafis consider Albani to be authorative. Most scholars don't even take him seriously. That is why even Sheikh Uthaymeen himself didn't agree with most of what Albani proposed.
@---- Salafis are not generally racist though, even though they tend to be judgemental, branding, takfiri, deviding and full of hatred in the heart
@---- Salafis have no Usul. No Usul of anything, not even of Akhlaq or Adhab. Salafism only appeals to people of similar mindsets, others move on, by the grace of Allah 😊
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Sir
I wish you to help me treat a book on usuul fiqh that i will like to learn and use with my family
Wa alykum assalam wa rahmat allahi wa barakatuhu akhi, how are you doing? Did you find the Zad al mustaaqni durus?
@@idreesabdallah.2664 Yes sir
@@alayetira7915 good brother, watch the videos after you finish the usool al fiqh durus also there is between that more you can watch like umdat al ahkam before zad as well because zad should be the last one. Also for an easy book for home I would recommend you to buy the 2 volume by Dr saleh Al fawzan it’s very easy to just go back to quickly. But these series are really good also if you need anything let me know. Or if anything is confusing. You can also look at the books series.
@@idreesabdallah.2664 Ok sir
What is shaykh’s name
Sheikh uthman ibn Farooq
18:35 because the prophet wasn't born in shaban or sha'wal
مُكَلَف and مُكَلِف
are different and not the same brother :)
make sure you pronounce it correctly next time