Supreme Court modifies order on construction ban within one kilometre of protected areas

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 окт 2024

Комментарии • 42

  • @prav047
    @prav047 Год назад +11

    Worst decision ... Even 1 km cannot be maintained .. why cant govt move all their activities outside 1 km ?? and help even the locals to move out (if possible)

  • @dlrishivanthi5047
    @dlrishivanthi5047 Год назад +5

    1 kilometer is not enough! 1.5 billion?! Last count!!! We are set to devour everything! Even the simple act of eating 3 meals (some hardly get 1 meal) a day will finish everything on Earth. Wither are we headed? Each one of us need to ask ourselves this question...@ 8 billion?!

  • @avinashluha188
    @avinashluha188 Год назад +7

    one of the bad judgement ever given by Supreme court of india as Wild Life Should Protect First . villager can be rehablited other area outside Protected forest Or Indigenious people can stay inside the forest but Mining and huge Construction Project Should Not allowed in Protected Forest area .
    as e are Faceing Climate change Rising temperature flood .

  • @dharmeshyadav4563
    @dharmeshyadav4563 Год назад +10

    Dr. Ambedkar through Constitution has indicated towards the importance of nature and it's protection. However, the plight of nation is that even the supreme court is not able to understand what Dr. Ambedkar meant. Nature, when it would be harsh, will not leave the judges and dictators. This decision is unfortunate

  • @sentimentalmindless
    @sentimentalmindless Год назад +6

    In the name of development, we are destroying everything, very sad that I’m helplessly watching this

  • @cosmicseeker1069
    @cosmicseeker1069 Год назад +2

    Definitely a bad judgement mean corruption is setting fast in judiciary!!!

  • @rithikreddy2051
    @rithikreddy2051 Год назад +5

    wrong decision by SC. it can be easily solved by relocating and providing land in other places .

  • @bavinash772
    @bavinash772 Год назад +3

    Kindly add the text in description box, as they were earlier in your videos. They are helpful to take notes. Thank you!!

  • @theeducatedpandaofr
    @theeducatedpandaofr Год назад +1

    @d2e 0:36 106 National Parks and 567 WildLife Sanctuaries

  • @SuerteDelMolinoFarm
    @SuerteDelMolinoFarm Год назад +1

    Greetings from the LooseNatural farm in Andalusia Spain where we currently live through a drought and we are creating swales

  • @opinionopinionz204
    @opinionopinionz204 Год назад +3

    Hi I just want to argue that leaving so many Kharab land, why should we Rehabilitate and Restore communities in Eco sensitive zone. why are we even allowing making of houses. At least the chief conservator of forest will be able to save the sensitive zone and to rehabilitate the diversity which is required for the generations to come.

  • @theeducatedpandaofr
    @theeducatedpandaofr Год назад +1

    @d2e 0:28 Error in Map. Karnala bird Sanctuary, Haryana marked in Maharashtra

  • @crypton_8l87
    @crypton_8l87 Год назад +2

    It's not economic sensitive zone please. It is ECOLOGICALLY sensitive zone! 🤦🏽

  • @nishasharma5018
    @nishasharma5018 Год назад +1

    Map marking needs correction - Maharstra will come where Haryana is written

  • @MaraThamizhan
    @MaraThamizhan Год назад +5

    Poor decision by SC 😢

  • @mashis7299
    @mashis7299 Год назад +3

    This is time we should do soemthing for our environment, naye roada ke liye hajaron ped kaate ja rahe hain, garmi badh gayi hai😢😢😢

  • @vaibhavbansal6034
    @vaibhavbansal6034 Год назад +6

    This ban should not have been lifted. It might be too late for us to realize the damage it can do to our already depleting biodiversity..

    • @rithikreddy2051
      @rithikreddy2051 Год назад

      true

    • @kingnole4237
      @kingnole4237 Год назад

      This is BJP for you....
      Until you will realise Modi may be die but the destruction he left will be immeasurable

    • @utkarshshrivastava6755
      @utkarshshrivastava6755 Год назад

      ​@@kingnole4237you do realize that the ban was lifted by SC not Union government

  • @swatisharma9006
    @swatisharma9006 Год назад +1

    Without population control- all good efforts will be neutralized.
    We need public awareness and public pressure for effective progress.
    It’s sad no leader has come forward with honest discussion. As scare as land is in a highly dense populated country- the ban/“unban”/modifications will all net result to negative impact on ecosystem.

  • @VIKAS_PATEL1997
    @VIKAS_PATEL1997 Год назад +1

    Tribal community live near jungle they live there from thousands of years still they maintain Jungle
    Why people who live in city cut most of there forest. & Pollute environment...
    Most of tribal groups live natural life ...
    .use less resources while city PPL use more products so more carbon emissions.....& Still make law for tribal community....which barely use car,ac, refrigerator etc.. have some shame & let them live with way they are.

  • @pajtmvorvndeifneif
    @pajtmvorvndeifneif Год назад +1

    Map mistake **
    Karnala not in haryana

  • @nikithanimbalkar9617
    @nikithanimbalkar9617 Год назад +4

    Not a good news 😢

  • @tukarammiskin1
    @tukarammiskin1 Год назад +3

    They could have allowed only limited activities

  • @Animalkisser
    @Animalkisser Год назад +1

    Only one kilometer???

  • @motherearth5229
    @motherearth5229 Год назад +1

    PMs of India are corporates.
    Not modi.

  • @selfenquiry456
    @selfenquiry456 Год назад +1

    Jab population control karne ka bill pass nhi huya hai aur strictly koi step nhi liya gya hai toh upr upr se ye sab karke koi fyda nhi, govt. asli kaam nhi karke faltu kar kar rhe hai, prithvi ke pass resources kam hon rhi hai aur population barne se har chiz ki quality toh bahat pehele hi kam hon gya hai that's why diseases baad rhi hai bcz of lack of nutrients in foods, decreasing the quality by increasing the quantity of products & specially water is the biggest issue, using excessive amount of drinking water for agriculture & construction

  • @justchillin_
    @justchillin_ Год назад +2

    Gov should buy the property in those area...

  • @somarakesh3163
    @somarakesh3163 Год назад +1

    Can anyone share the judgement copy dt 26-4-23

  • @sanjibkumar80
    @sanjibkumar80 Год назад +2

    Judges changed decision changed..
    Welcome to new India

  • @utkarshsharma6501
    @utkarshsharma6501 Год назад

    irritable background music

  • @Taikamanvlog
    @Taikamanvlog Год назад

    ❤❤❤

  • @JOSHII87
    @JOSHII87 Год назад

    Good decision.

  • @chefsanjib
    @chefsanjib Год назад +1

    Another game is being played by NGOs