One common criticism of wing chun that I have heard is that the fighters supposedly do not guard their face. Can you explain your reasoning for why this may have arisen as a criticism?
Because 90% of winch chun schools dont really understand how to apply it. This is due to to a lack of gorr sau ( sparing). WC is really a very free style system. Students confuse training stances and drills with application. There really is no definitive fighting stance. WC is a self defence system. in self defence you react to the situation, there is not usally time to stand in a pose. There is a basic training stance, but it is more for conditioning etc. when free sparring the stance and gaurd looks more like that of traditional bare knuckle fighting.
Wing chun was combimed by ancient Chinese monks those were the original MMA wing chun footwork is actually a drill and a learning exercise its up to the practioner to use whatever footwork he likes I personally use traditional muay thai stance and ive used many wing chun blocks and attacks in sparring
very good,but in my opinion....the chi sao is too high,should be worked at medium height, there is no control with the elbows on the opponent ....Sorry and thanks🙏🙏🙏
Sorry I'm French, I'm using a translator (google translation) sorry if he makes mistakes 😉 I like martial arts, I'm 51, (I have my life behind me) but showing everyone gestures could not harm others? Have knights lost so many values for so little time? Or are you part of a cult?
![How to Chi Sao without a Partner [Wing Chun Sticky Hands Alone]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9mJfuAGLVnk/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey.. Im from Brisbane,,Studied in Brendale Brisbane..Enjoyed Watching. You reminded me of my Sifu. Sifu Paul Maclaine
I’m glad you enjoyed the video. My best wishes to you, Sifu Paul and Dianne Maclaine and all at Brendale Brisbane Wing Chun. Sifu Dominic Békés
One common criticism of wing chun that I have heard is that the fighters supposedly do not guard their face. Can you explain your reasoning for why this may have arisen as a criticism?
Because 90% of winch chun schools dont really understand how to apply it. This is due to to a lack of gorr sau ( sparing). WC is really a very free style system. Students confuse training stances and drills with application. There really is no definitive fighting stance. WC is a self defence system. in self defence you react to the situation, there is not usally time to stand in a pose. There is a basic training stance, but it is more for conditioning etc. when free sparring the stance and gaurd looks more like that of traditional bare knuckle fighting.
Wing chun was combimed by ancient Chinese monks those were the original MMA wing chun footwork is actually a drill and a learning exercise its up to the practioner to use whatever footwork he likes I personally use traditional muay thai stance and ive used many wing chun blocks and attacks in sparring
😇🙏
this reminds me of the good ole days when I would take hung gar kung fu then go out for chinese food after lol..
very good,but in my opinion....the chi sao is too high,should be worked at medium height,
there is no control with the elbows on the opponent ....Sorry and thanks🙏🙏🙏
Sorry I'm French, I'm using a translator (google translation) sorry if he makes mistakes 😉 I like martial arts, I'm 51,
(I have my life behind me) but showing everyone gestures could not harm others?
Have knights lost so many values for so little time? Or are you part of a cult?
Pointless! Just noise.