G. Loomis IMX-Pro Blue Review - Are they worth the money?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @SCHan247
    @SCHan247 3 года назад +1

    Hey man. Nice review. I have that same 844s mf rod. I'm wondering if you have a rod pulse when reeling like I do? When I put my saragosa 5000 on it, the line rubbed the first guide so hard that you could hear it when reeling. I think I can hear it in your video, but not a 100% sure. Can you confirm this? Also, the first guide is huge compared to the others right?

    • @reelcastcharters1306
      @reelcastcharters1306  3 года назад

      Braided line will make some noise in the guides, I have never noticed anything that isn't normal with mine.

  • @grantd.5438
    @grantd.5438 Год назад

    It would be really neat to do a side-by-side comparison between the IMX-pro blue rod and the Teramar NE XX 70 MH. I am really torn between these two lol

    • @robe997
      @robe997 Год назад

      Good idea. I was in the same spot and went with the imx. Hbu you??

    • @grantd.5438
      @grantd.5438 Год назад +1

      @@robe997 I have one of each lol, found used. I am leaning toward Teramar XX though (lighter in hand IMO). Both paired with Penn Spinfisher VI 4500s and balanced out well, actually can't see putting a much heavier reel on....but that is just personal preference.

  • @Craiggy83
    @Craiggy83 3 года назад

    Thanks for your review. I wanted to pick up a spinning rod for a party boat. I was thinking of using it this year for Tautog, but maybe use it for striper fishing and also fluke fishing. I know on the party boat I could go up to 10-12oz or more. Do you like the 844s MF or 844s f. I'm thinking the MF because it's a good middle ground between say M and F. I wish I had the rods in front of me to compare. Thank you!

    • @reelcastcharters1306
      @reelcastcharters1306  3 года назад

      I prefer the 844SMF for my fishing, it has a softer tip. The 844SF is a "stiffer" rod.

    • @Craiggy83
      @Craiggy83 3 года назад

      @@reelcastcharters1306 Thanks for your quick reply. My understanding is the power would be the same, but the 844SF would have a softer tip that starts to bend mainly at the end while the 844SMF would extend a little further down the rod. Which one do you think would handle larger weight bottom fishing? I'm still leaning towards the 844SMF because I think it would be more versatile but I'm sure it would be less sensitive.

  • @jinsu0504
    @jinsu0504 2 года назад

    how sensitive is this? and how is the castability compared to the st croix legend surf rods.

  • @ReelFrontier
    @ReelFrontier 2 года назад

    By looks of if it, the 844S MF can throw 2oz pretty comforablely. How well does it throw baits in the 3oz range? Thanks.

  • @Avv45
    @Avv45 2 года назад

    Hi, do you think the 904c would suit a tranx 500? As I have one but I know there’s a bit of a size/weight difference between the 400 and 500 tranx, or would one of the other imx pro blues suit it better? Cheers

  • @alphasports-socalusa.7355
    @alphasports-socalusa.7355 Год назад

    Why doesn't G Loomis list the Lure Rating for these rods on their website?

    • @zveryok1
      @zveryok1 Год назад

      They used to at some point. The 2 powered rods had a max of 1.5 oz or about 45 grams. The 3 powered rods maxed out at 2 oz or 60 grams. The 4 powered at 3 or so oz.

  • @angelorivera4720
    @angelorivera4720 3 года назад

    love my spinning versions but im truly disappointed in the casting versions i have 3 casting 845 nd 905 have busted on me several times on a fish strike. im baffled to say the least !!!!!!!