Thank you bro for this video lecture. This video help me alot. I had confusion in the phasor diagram, but after watching this video it clear my all concept. 👍💕
thank you manav for your complement. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that also if you want.
i m happy to know this ayithi. thank you very much. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Sir please use a pointer which is easy to notice, genuinally it took me double time to finish the video cause i have to find out the pointer first after every new line
ya i know... actually i didn't know that time how to use highlighted pointer. thats why i couldn't use that. i will rectify this in coming videos. by the way recently a comprehensive video lecture serieshas been added in our channel. u can waty that if uou want. Again thank you bharat for your feedback.
Grear Video!!! I have observations and questions: The resulting diagram that you get will not satisfy these equation V1=E1+I1R1+jI1X1. Why E1 is -E1? There are many books with different phasor diagram, for example: Example 1: magnetic circuits and transformers ee staff mit. This has a convention where the resulting diagram that you get satisfy these equation V1=E1+I1R1+jI1X1. Example 2: AC Machine Theory - A.Langsdorf. This your convention but This mentions the other way to graph the phasor diagram indicated in the previous book. So, Could you explain me about these different points of view? My conclusion is that your convention does not handle the point convention but the other one does handle the point convention. it is correct? As would be the procedure to establish a phasor diagram for an equivalent circuit of the transformer. It would be to establish the signs of the voltages and directions of the currents and based on the equations draw the diagram.
Because EMF(E1) is always induced such that it tends oppose the change producing it in that case, the primary side of things(Lenz Law). That's why E1 was placed on the -y axis and was brought back to y-axis albeit negative. Atleast, thats the rationale I came up with.
Assume there are no loss of energy in the primary side of things, and V1=E1. E1 will be equal but opposite to V1. Hence, if its placed in the +y axis it ought to be negative.
thank you sam. i have explained the the thing in spandan Dash's comment. please read that one. i can't copy the text from that. and yes, we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that also.
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
yes yes ashok. actually you know what... when i started to record screen i didn't know how to highlight the cursor and record. now i learnt. i wl rectify this problem next time. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
yes anik. actually when i started the channel i didn't know how to highlight cursor and record the screen. definitely i wl keep this thing in mind. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive lecture series on power electronics in this channel. please watch that also
sure amit. i will do that next time. actually when I started the video making i didn't know how to highlight the cursor and record. i learnt nw. this won't be problem anymore. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Im is developed due to v1 but what is the reason that the e1 will oppose v1 according to the transformers emf equation (e2)/(e1)=(n2)/(n1)=(v2)/(v1) so why should e1 oppose v1
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
yess nikunj. i wl do that next time. i didn't know that time jow to highlight the cursor. now i learnt. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that.
Mohammed Aamer04 basically it is a theoritical concept that whenever mentioning that lagging or leading of a load is present then we always consider the current should be lead or lag w.r.t the voltage
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
That is because conventionally we take - to + as negative,in E1 current is flowing from + to - ,you know that when we apply kvl we have to assign signs ,if you take the direction of current as clockwise then the equation that was in this video will be formed and you will get the answer you are asking him for.
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
spandan, thank you very much for raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But I have I have seen in other other books that they have drawn E1 in the reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to be correct with respective logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from IIT KHARAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually when the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diagram will produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nptel lecture if you want. i have to find it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want. Once again, Thank You very much.
it depends on the type of load if the load in inductive it will lag ,for capacitive load it will lead voltage by 90 deg ,and in pure resistive case it will be in phase
AR GAMING gave the correct answer. anyway boini... recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
actually my hindi is not so well. thats why i made in English. i wl learn better and provide in hindi also. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
okay bibeka. i wl try to do that. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
thank you mohan. next time i will make it better. by da way recently we have added a new comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too and give your feedback.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
this is the best video on this topic, no unnecessary stuff; short, compact and to the point
I watched many videos to understand this but nothing better than this video .. great explanation
2hr dusre video par waste karne k baad aapke video mile thanks a lot for explaining in superv way and minimum time
thank you punit. inspired by precious feedback. we have come up with a comprehensive lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that also.
So far the best explanation on this topic. Cleared all my doubts. 🤘👌
This is powerpack lecture... All in one... Thankful to u sir
thank you dear, you're most welcome. recently we have added a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that.
Use thicker and darker cursor/pointer.... It's really hard to notice
thank you ayush for your precious feedback. i will rectify this. you can watch our new videos, which cane recently in the channel.
This is the video that I was looking for..... I watched so mannnyyy videos....but this one has got everything covered...... Thanks dude
Thank you bro for this video lecture. This video help me alot. I had confusion in the phasor diagram, but after watching this video it clear my all concept.
👍💕
This just clarified everything..
Thank you good sir. 🎓🤝👏👏
thank you very much.
recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
thank you sir.....very informative video on phasor diagram of transformers...got my doubts cleared because of you..keep it up👍👍
Great explanation.
Excellent explanation bro tqq so much
thank you much dear. we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics in our channel. u can watch that also.
Very impactful and knowledgeable educational video
I am very glad that i have seen this video and learnt something
Thankyou very much again 👍
Thanks bro SAB ache we samjh aaya mereko thanks a lot
Nice explanation. I understood well. Thank you sir.
you are most welcome ritik. we have come up with a comprehensive lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that also 🙂🙂🙂
Very nice explanation thanks a lot
Thank you for this vedio sir am so confused in book but your vedio clear my doubts
such a commendable explanation!!!!....best video on this topic🙌🙌🙌
best phasor diagram video. GIVE THIS MAN A FVCKING AWARD
thank you sayan. thank you very much. recently we have added a new comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
good work man it helps a lot.Appreciate your work. Thumbs up
i m honoured dear. thanks. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Thanku so much sir, you make the the tough topic very easy to understand
thank you manav for your complement. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that also if you want.
Tqsm sir ❤🎉
1:03 starts
Thank you sir😊
So useful, thanks a lot bro
4:36 it's still ideal when u consider the copper loss and leakage flux in primary then its practical
Amazing video ❤❤
thankyou so much sir for yhis video
Nice one ! 👍 quite easy to understand ! 😌
Super explanation!
Bro why didn't you consider -E1 in the primary sidee
Thank you very much sir! It was really good and helpful
thank you very much.
recently we have added a new comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
this video helps me to how to draw a phasor diagrams
i m happy to know this ayithi. thank you very much. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Sir please use a pointer which is easy to notice, genuinally it took me double time to finish the video cause i have to find out the pointer first after every new line
ya i know... actually i didn't know that time how to use highlighted pointer. thats why i couldn't use that. i will rectify this in coming videos.
by the way recently a comprehensive video lecture serieshas been added in our channel. u can waty that if uou want. Again thank you bharat for your feedback.
Grear Video!!!
I have observations and questions:
The resulting diagram that you get will not satisfy these equation V1=E1+I1R1+jI1X1. Why E1 is -E1?
There are many books with different phasor diagram, for example:
Example 1:
magnetic circuits and transformers ee staff mit. This has a convention where the resulting diagram that you get satisfy these equation V1=E1+I1R1+jI1X1.
Example 2:
AC Machine Theory - A.Langsdorf. This your convention but This mentions the other way to graph the phasor diagram indicated in the previous book.
So, Could you explain me about these different points of view?
My conclusion is that your convention does not handle the point convention but the other one does handle the point convention. it is correct?
As would be the procedure to establish a phasor diagram for an equivalent circuit of the transformer. It would be to establish the signs of the voltages and directions of the currents and based on the equations draw the diagram.
Hi, Could you explain me Why E1 is -E1?
Because EMF(E1) is always induced such that it tends oppose the change producing it in that case, the primary side of things(Lenz Law). That's why E1 was placed on the -y axis and was brought back to y-axis albeit negative. Atleast, thats the rationale I came up with.
Assume there are no loss of energy in the primary side of things, and V1=E1. E1 will be equal but opposite to V1. Hence, if its placed in the +y axis it ought to be negative.
Very super Sir ji
thank you ravi. We have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Best one
12:30 Why isnt it -V1. I am asking this because -V1=I1R1+I1X1-E1
Please do vedios according to vtu eee 21 scheme🙏🏻🙏🏻❤ it would be great help fr Karnatka students 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Sir please explain the capacitve load on also. Phasorr diagram
Good one.
Sir pls make video on phasor diagram. By that we can draw any phasor diagram to any circuit
Very good
thankyou very much😊
you're most welcome akshant. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
4:15 E and V are opposite due to.... Reason?
thank you sam. i have explained the the thing in spandan Dash's comment. please read that one. i can't copy the text from that. and yes, we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that also.
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
Sir your explanation is good but that arrow is not visible correctly, that is the negative, so i think you will correct next time sir
yes yes ashok. actually you know what... when i started to record screen i didn't know how to highlight the cursor and record. now i learnt. i wl rectify this problem next time. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
⁷ leading power factor can u please tell me why the current I1 got shifted up closer to -E1?
Same question
Ideal transformer with load?
okay we will make video on that also. we are a small team. so more time we required.
Why the primary e1 takes as minus? Expalin
Exillient
thank you dear. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
You don't show us on the diagram the sign + for the voltage. Why? Maybe it's irrelevant but form me it would be much easier to follow your explanation
Conclusion after watching this.... : cheat bna lo
Nice
thank you dear. recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
Sir please increase the curser sir or else please change the curser symbol. It's not clear . It's hard to find the position of the curser
guys who are watching this video after 3 years 😂😂
Even Your comment become one year old
😂😂😂
@study eetech please show the cursor big ,i can't able to find where are you are pointing
yes anik. actually when i started the channel i didn't know how to highlight cursor and record the screen. definitely i wl keep this thing in mind. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive lecture series on power electronics in this channel. please watch that also
Why i1 increase if E1 decreases
Video is good but when you say this that time i find where is arrow due to small size plz increase the size of arrow
sure amit. i will do that next time. actually when I started the video making i didn't know how to highlight the cursor and record. i learnt nw. this won't be problem anymore. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Im is developed due to v1 but what is the reason that the e1 will oppose v1
according to the transformers emf equation
(e2)/(e1)=(n2)/(n1)=(v2)/(v1)
so why should e1 oppose v1
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
@@jayabratamaity6889 yes plz send the link
Please use curser with another colour bhai
Becoz at last part it is just invisible
yess nikunj. i wl do that next time. i didn't know that time jow to highlight the cursor. now i learnt. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch that.
THANKS
welcome tanvir
Why I2 lags E2 .....I can't understand.
Mohammed Aamer04 basically it is a theoritical concept that whenever mentioning that lagging or leading of a load is present then we always consider the current should be lead or lag w.r.t the voltage
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
@1:36 🤣🤣
wrong, you have not explained why V1 = - E1+I1R1 +JI1X1, primary side
Yes bro
That is because conventionally we take - to + as negative,in E1 current is flowing from + to - ,you know that when we apply kvl we have to assign signs ,if you take the direction of current as clockwise then the equation that was in this video will be formed and you will get the answer you are asking him for.
thank you very much tor raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But l have I have seen in oiher other books that lhey have drawn E1 in 1he reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to bc correct 'Nith respcctive logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from lIT KHAPAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually 'Nhen the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diaqram vvill produce same result. So any convention can be followed. I can send you the link of the nplel lecture if you want. i have to fmd it in the RUclips. it id available there. by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
@@jayabratamaity6889 keep me that Nptel video lecture link sir
@@jayabratamaity6889 ...please send the link...thanks in advance
Why -E1 ?, as V1 = E1 + I1R1 + I1X1.
spandan, thank you very much for raising the question. actually i had this doubt also. i researched a lot. in m g say's book i have seen -E1 is not taken. it was drawn in the same direction as V1. But I have I have seen in other other books that they have drawn E1 in the reverse direction as -E1. Both are seemed to be correct with respective logic. That actually made the confusion, which convention to be followed. Then in one NPTEL lecture from IIT KHARAGPUR, the profossor told that actually both phasor diagram correct. Actually when the transformer parameters calculation is concerned from the phasor, both the phasor diagram will produce same result. So any convention can be followed.
I can send you the link of the nptel lecture if you want. i have to find it in the RUclips. it id available there.
by the way, recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. you can watch that if you want.
Once again, Thank You very much.
Halo help me with generator single phase diagram
Leading me btao na sir
Why i2 is lagging current
it depends on the type of load if the load in inductive it will lag ,for capacitive load it will lead voltage by 90 deg ,and in pure resistive case it will be in phase
AR GAMING gave the correct answer. anyway boini... recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
iron loss is not hysteresis or eddy current loss it is the I^2R loss occuring as heat
Guys "OA"means way
Don't get confuse🤣🤣🤣
hindi m bataya kro
Hindi kaha mile ga
Bhai mila to batana
@@bibekanandanayak8839 kya batau
actually my hindi is not so well. thats why i made in English. i wl learn better and provide in hindi also. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. u can watch them too.
Kuch ache se explain Karo bro.... Thoda acha study karao
Hindi re sir
okay bibeka. i wl try to do that. by da way recently we have come up with a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too.
Not explained well
thank you mohan. next time i will make it better. by da way recently we have added a new comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics. please watch them too and give your feedback.
Hi, Could you explain me Why E1 is -E1?
Thank u so much sir
you're most welcome sweta. a comprehensive video lecture series on power electronics has been added to the channel recently. u can watch that too.
Thank you so much sir