Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter, etc.. ( Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve our future content. A big thank you from all of us.
Asteroids are NOT only the ones in the asteroid belt, all minor planets of metallic, rocky or carbonaceous composition are asteroids and they are spread all across the SS
I have no idea why this talk of the formation of planets and the kuiper belt, gives me a strange desire to see a project of just start throwing all the KBO's at each other to form a new planet. I wonder just how possible/impossible that would be. Eventually you'd get enough of a mass that it would start attracting the other smaller objects into itself. You wouldn't really have to launch objects hard, just nudge them into the right direction.
@@MrGrumblier That only really would apply if the the target object/ objects were already in a highly elliptical orbit that brought them in close enough to the outer giants. Keep in mind the belt is way farther out than we might like to think of it. The kuiper belt and oort cloud have substantial objects several times the distance from Neptune than neptune even has to the sun. Neptune probably wouldn't be that big of a factor, or at least on any mortal timescale.
@@TheJadeFist Neptune is the reason for the KB. Its gravity is likely what prevented those bodies from coalescing into a planetoid, just as Jupiter prevented the formation of a planet where instead we have the asteroid belt.
@@MrGrumblier Maybe in the earlier solar system, it ejected objects out that way is partially or largely responsible for the kuiper belt. But as it stands now, a lot those objects are already pretty far away. Pluto hasn't been torn asunder by tidal forces.
@@TheJadeFist No, it hasn't, and neither has Eris, but you were talking about nudging bodies in order to form a new planetoid. Neptune's gravity would most likely prevent such a formation.
Liquid water can, and likely does exist among the KB objects. For those bodies orbiting with forces such that it contorts the volume within such objects, thereby warming their interior.
Fwarf planet yes as few bodies already discovered there, but Pluto is 2/3 of our Moon-so dearf planet is okay...it got his own classification of planets also
Thunderbird is ford brother ... It's Firebird lol.. I have had my Trans Am for over 20 years now... I'll never let it go!! Pontiac always had the best stuff!! GM hasn't been the same since Pontiac had been gone
I don't understand how Neptune could be discovered with 19th century math and technology, yet this planet x (9) remains a mystery. Neptunes magnetic field is strange and powerful but it's not that powerful. not for all of that that's out there
It's a natural insainly large elliptical orbit. Per the theory...based on supposed oddities of Neptunes behavior. Truth is there are many many unknowns that could effect Neptune similarly. It keeps coming back and forth...our ability to observe is over the top now and getting better. Far far out pacing our ability to truly understand what we observe. Nothing goods gonna come from jwst for years...we'll hear a lot of crap, but years to understand.
Why not call the "Kuiper belt" the Edgeworth comets torus? there's a gap in the two tori ("toruses") called Kuiper cliff in the video, as far as computational discovery goes (yet), so would there be an object in between? in this "documentary" there lacks a lot of content, from comparisons or not. The maker of this video must have dealt with some restrictions forcing "him" to avoid the larger part of data... like the Grand Tack or planet migration in general. Or as the question if the hills cloud (you don't know) would be pulled inward due to the missing of "Nemesis", the sun's twin or silbling (feeding Jupiter). For being published in mid-2024 there would have been a lot of data (re)sources to optimize this elongated "info-tainment" that "viewers want to see in this way". Telling "us" why some told observations would be so deeply as-t(r)on-ishing. Such video stuff "is all about" not (being able to?) tell an american truth (of "must-know facts") to viewers in countries foreign to the "U.S.", i'd add. Or did i mis-lead me into Kindergarten here?
If only objects in the asteroid belt are considered " asteroids" then Kuiper Belt Objects could be called "Gastroids", since most these objects are gaseous and would act like comets....?
Great topic, and yes I believe there are many more large objects in the belt. No I don't think there are 200 dwarf planets yet I do think there are some big ice balls out there. Then there is the Ort cloud...
@@allan9603 But I did not reference anything as not asteroids. Large iceballs. So what you're saying makes no sense. It's like you're looking for a fight. I choose not to play your game. I don't understand what the F you're talking about. So either explain it in detail, or F -off I don't want to play your game but I can
These repetitive images of countless rocks flying very near each other are highly misleading. If you were to sit in any random KBO without a binary companion observing the sky, you would unlikely be able to even see any other KBO due to the enourmous distances between objects. The visible sky would be only your own rock, a very distant sun, the still much more distant stars and a vast empty void between all of those.
The Oort Cloud is a distant region of our solar system, much farther out than the Kuiper Belt. It's believed to be a huge sphere of icy objects surrounding the Sun, and it's where many comets come from.
Hi! Thanks for your comment. Sedna is a distant, mysterious object in our solar system, located far beyond the Kuiper Belt. It has an extremely elongated orbit, taking around 11,400 years to complete one trip around the Sun. Sedna is interesting because its unusual orbit suggests it might have been influenced by something beyond the known planets, possibly even another star.
KBOs can leave their orbit due to gravitational interactions with other objects, such as Neptune or other large Kuiper Belt Objects. These interactions can alter their paths, sometimes sending them into the inner solar system or even ejecting them entirely.
@@InsaneCuriosity So its kind of like that coin game at the funfair with the sliders and only if you time it right (Neptune gets close to a part of the belt that is sensitive to changes) does a KBO drop out. Makes sense.
There was a planet twice the size of Earth it was called Tiamat. Tiamat got pulled in half to form the Asteroid belt. The other half reformed round to be come Earth with a new orbit. Sumerian Tablets.
What a nonsense. Asteroids are any object that is smaller than a planet, not shaped like a sphere and not a comet (with a tail). Please don't teach us the basics, learn them yourself first!
Thank you for your hard work putting this video together. You did a wonderful job. You are teaching us that find everything universe fascinating..I wish I discovered this love for this subject 35 years ago..I would have known what I wanted to do with my lifes work instead of getting a business degree and wasting my time with a meaningless career that will never move humanity forward and I will never get to make a difference in this world to any meaningful degree. The way I wish I could. I admire astrophysics and scientists similar to them.
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Insane Science of Neutron Stars [4K]](/img/1.gif)
Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter, etc.. ( Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve our future content. A big thank you from all of us.
"HD191089 is younger, and hotter" sounds like our solar system is going through a bit of a midlife crisis.
😂
Asteroids are NOT only the ones in the asteroid belt, all minor planets of metallic, rocky or carbonaceous composition are asteroids and they are spread all across the SS
I was going to make comment about this. The Trojan Asteroids are not in the asteroid belt but are still asteroids because they orbit the sun
Make a video about the Oort cloud if there is enough information is available.
I'll consider making a video about it
I want to know more about the oort cloud as well
Oort cloud is hypothetical.
Great video and information !
There were KBOs found in the 1970s, we just did not know how to classify them. I remember the discovery of Object Kowal in 1977.
Absolutely amazing. I learned so much, but I'd still have to watch this video 20 more times to understand 50% of what was covered.
I have no idea why this talk of the formation of planets and the kuiper belt, gives me a strange desire to see a project of just start throwing all the KBO's at each other to form a new planet. I wonder just how possible/impossible that would be. Eventually you'd get enough of a mass that it would start attracting the other smaller objects into itself.
You wouldn't really have to launch objects hard, just nudge them into the right direction.
I think they would end up just spreading out into a ring again due to Neptune's gravity after ejecting a few bits and bobs into the inner system.
@@MrGrumblier That only really would apply if the the target object/ objects were already in a highly elliptical orbit that brought them in close enough to the outer giants. Keep in mind the belt is way farther out than we might like to think of it.
The kuiper belt and oort cloud have substantial objects several times the distance from Neptune than neptune even has to the sun.
Neptune probably wouldn't be that big of a factor, or at least on any mortal timescale.
@@TheJadeFist Neptune is the reason for the KB. Its gravity is likely what prevented those bodies from coalescing into a planetoid, just as Jupiter prevented the formation of a planet where instead we have the asteroid belt.
@@MrGrumblier Maybe in the earlier solar system, it ejected objects out that way is partially or largely responsible for the kuiper belt. But as it stands now, a lot those objects are already pretty far away. Pluto hasn't been torn asunder by tidal forces.
@@TheJadeFist No, it hasn't, and neither has Eris, but you were talking about nudging bodies in order to form a new planetoid. Neptune's gravity would most likely prevent such a formation.
One of my favourite topics❤ downloaded & will enjoy it in free time :)
Astronomers are the most unimaginative namers😂
Me: still reeling from Pluto's demotion.
Pluto's smaller than many moons
First sentence: 'The Kuiper Belt is one of the most distant objects in the solar system '. Uhm......object? Is the asteroid belt AN object, then?
ENGLISH matters.
Liquid water can, and likely does exist among the KB objects. For those bodies orbiting with forces such that it contorts the volume within such objects, thereby warming their interior.
Great video
I believe it was like most astronomical anomalies, stuff hit stuff.
I’m amazed our planets don’t bump into each other at times.
I don't care what anyone says.... Pluto is a PLANET!!!!
Yup. A dwarf planet
How do you throw a party for Pluto?
You planet.
Your onto it, mate ! Cheers from New Zealand 😊
That's like the "a trans woman is a woman" argument. :)
Fwarf planet yes as few bodies already discovered there, but Pluto is 2/3 of our Moon-so dearf planet is okay...it got his own classification of planets also
The Kuiper Belt is made up of the remnants of a planet once called Alderran...
Thunderbird is ford brother ...
It's Firebird lol..
I have had my Trans Am for over 20 years now... I'll never let it go!!
Pontiac always had the best stuff!! GM hasn't been the same since Pontiac had been gone
I don't understand how Neptune could be discovered with 19th century math and technology, yet this planet x (9) remains a mystery. Neptunes magnetic field is strange and powerful but it's not that powerful. not for all of that that's out there
It's a natural insainly large elliptical orbit. Per the theory...based on supposed oddities of Neptunes behavior. Truth is there are many many unknowns that could effect Neptune similarly. It keeps coming back and forth...our ability to observe is over the top now and getting better. Far far out pacing our ability to truly understand what we observe. Nothing goods gonna come from jwst for years...we'll hear a lot of crap, but years to understand.
Why not call the "Kuiper belt" the Edgeworth comets torus? there's a gap in the two tori ("toruses") called Kuiper cliff in the video, as far as computational discovery goes (yet), so would there be an object in between? in this "documentary" there lacks a lot of content, from comparisons or not. The maker of this video must have dealt with some restrictions forcing "him" to avoid the larger part of data... like the Grand Tack or planet migration in general. Or as the question if the hills cloud (you don't know) would be pulled inward due to the missing of "Nemesis", the sun's twin or silbling (feeding Jupiter). For being published in mid-2024 there would have been a lot of data (re)sources to optimize this elongated "info-tainment" that "viewers want to see in this way". Telling "us" why some told observations would be so deeply as-t(r)on-ishing. Such video stuff "is all about" not (being able to?) tell an american truth (of "must-know facts") to viewers in countries foreign to the "U.S.", i'd add. Or did i mis-lead me into Kindergarten here?
If only objects in the asteroid belt are considered " asteroids" then Kuiper Belt Objects could be called "Gastroids", since most these objects are gaseous and would act like comets....?
Light sail technology - 20% of the speed of light.
Nibiru is up there😅
Great topic, and yes I believe there are many more large objects in the belt. No I don't think there are 200 dwarf planets yet I do think there are some big ice balls out there.
Then there is the Ort cloud...
Nobody is going to change the name of asteroids, be they in the Belt or not.
@@allan9603 what?
@@jssomewhere6740 As I said.
Just because an asteroid is in the Kuiper Belt, doesn't mean it's no longer called an asteroid ,as the narrator stated.
@@allan9603
But I did not reference anything as not asteroids. Large iceballs. So what you're saying makes no sense. It's like you're looking for a fight. I choose not to play your game. I don't understand what the F you're talking about. So either explain it in detail, or F -off
I don't want to play your game but I can
@@jssomewhere6740 I have a feeling that he thinks he was replying to a different comment.
At around 21:00, you mentioned that the Antipolus twins are 125,000 km apart, but the onscreen distance showed 12,500 km. Can't be both, I.C..🤨
"Too far from the sun" to have any liquid water. Because that is the only factor. Tidal forces, radiation Nope.
The kb is sphere of rocks and is not a ring isn’t?
You're right! The Kuiper Belt is often depicted as a ring, but it's actually a sphere of icy objects surrounding our solar system.
@@InsaneCuriosity You were right the first time: the Kuiper Belt is a circumsolar disk. The Oort Cloud is a spherical distribution of objects.
These repetitive images of countless rocks flying very near each other are highly misleading. If you were to sit in any random KBO without a binary companion observing the sky, you would unlikely be able to even see any other KBO due to the enourmous distances between objects. The visible sky would be only your own rock, a very distant sun, the still much more distant stars and a vast empty void between all of those.
There’s a reason why you have almost 2m subscribers…. YOU ARE GOOD 1:56
Sublimation is to go from a solid state to a gas state.
I thought t.n.o where the asteroids in the oort cloud
The only thing you don't have in your video is the radiation exposure for people getting there🤔
Roger, there is a tone difference in your voice. Go see your PCP, seriously.
... the 'stame' star...😂😅
Pluto is a planet
Bro "TNBs can't be astroids", there is allot of asteroid talk around 1:45. Less than a minute lol
how 'bout the oort cloud?
The Oort Cloud is a distant region of our solar system, much farther out than the Kuiper Belt. It's believed to be a huge sphere of icy objects surrounding the Sun, and it's where many comets come from.
@@InsaneCuriosity any kryptonite there?
What about Sedna?
Hi! Thanks for your comment. Sedna is a distant, mysterious object in our solar system, located far beyond the Kuiper Belt. It has an extremely elongated orbit, taking around 11,400 years to complete one trip around the Sun. Sedna is interesting because its unusual orbit suggests it might have been influenced by something beyond the known planets, possibly even another star.
@@InsaneCuriosity But it is currently inside the Kuiper belt (84au).
How do KBOs leave their orbit?
KBOs can leave their orbit due to gravitational interactions with other objects, such as Neptune or other large Kuiper Belt Objects. These interactions can alter their paths, sometimes sending them into the inner solar system or even ejecting them entirely.
@@InsaneCuriosity So its kind of like that coin game at the funfair with the sliders and only if you time it right (Neptune gets close to a part of the belt that is sensitive to changes) does a KBO drop out. Makes sense.
10×6
Are solar system is not done evolving ! In fact our earth is still accumulating tons of mass year after year !
There was a planet twice the size of Earth it was called Tiamat. Tiamat got pulled in half to form the Asteroid belt. The other half reformed round to be come Earth with a new orbit. Sumerian Tablets.
Ah, yes, ancient tablets are definitely the definitive source for scientific information 🙄
What a nonsense. Asteroids are any object that is smaller than a planet, not shaped like a sphere and not a comet (with a tail). Please don't teach us the basics, learn them yourself first!
AI voice = dislike
Pluto is Mickey's pet, and is an orange-ish color. But I'm almost nearly certain that he is not a planet.
They are not asteroids,they’re hemorrhoids.
It's still smaller than my mother-in-law's belt.
Thank you for your hard work putting this video together. You did a wonderful job. You are teaching us that find everything universe fascinating..I wish I discovered this love for this subject 35 years ago..I would have known what I wanted to do with my lifes work instead of getting a business degree and wasting my time with a meaningless career that will never move humanity forward and I will never get to make a difference in this world to any meaningful degree. The way I wish I could. I admire astrophysics and scientists similar to them.