Consolidated Financial Statements. Explained + Example CPA exam

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 мар 2022
  • In this session, I discuss consolidated financial statement as it related to the CPA exam
    ✅For more visit: www.farhatlectures.com
    #cpaexam #cpareview #cpa

Комментарии • 19

  • @user-sm1fh1iy4p
    @user-sm1fh1iy4p 3 месяца назад

    I generally avoid Farhat's YT videos since I find a lot of them a bit too rushed, but this lecture is gold.

  • @giryilham5892
    @giryilham5892 Год назад +1

    i wanna meet this guy and shake his hand. Thank you so much for this lecture sir!

  • @eyadmasoud641
    @eyadmasoud641 2 года назад +4

    Amazing lecture . compressive example

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 года назад +1

      Thank you. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures

    • @antonmursid3505
      @antonmursid3505 Год назад +2

      Antonmursid🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏✌🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨✌👌💝🙏

  • @julieshah-ne4bt
    @julieshah-ne4bt 4 дня назад

    In the Adjustment column can you please explain how did you ended up with figure 593,500?

  • @georgecortezee6091
    @georgecortezee6091 2 года назад +1

    THANK YOU
    GOOD LUCK

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 года назад

      Thank you. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures`

  • @shumirahman2382
    @shumirahman2382 5 месяцев назад

    I am in a confused situation. I need to know the complete guide of Consolidated financial statement. You have so many lectures. I am not getting the sequence of it.

  • @jonathanwieler8863
    @jonathanwieler8863 2 года назад +1

    Thank you!

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 года назад

      Most welcome. Please connect with me: linktr.ee/farhatlectures

  • @mp-sv2cp
    @mp-sv2cp 2 года назад +2

    I think the adjusted balance for COGS is wrong? should be $11,300,000?

    • @riyaziaf
      @riyaziaf Год назад

      YES, U R RIGHT. IT SHOULDBE 11300K. ALSO GROSS MARGIN AFTER ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE 7300K. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE OF 60K IN BOTH.

  • @sonerguney3225
    @sonerguney3225 2 года назад +1

    Super

  • @Lotus0305
    @Lotus0305 Год назад

    Shouldn’t R&as be expensed (recorded in P&L instead of an asset)?

    • @Lotus0305
      @Lotus0305 Год назад

      I mean… Shouldn’t *R&D* be expensed (recorded in P&L instead of Assets)?

    • @user-sm1fh1iy4p
      @user-sm1fh1iy4p 3 месяца назад

      @@Lotus0305 Yes you are correct. However, the R&D expense mentioned in this problem is not the same as the concept you are mentioning. Here, the acquirer is willing to pay 150K excess over the Book Value of the net assets of the acquiree because of some on going R&D in the company which is valuable. In the acquiree's books the R&D expense, whatever the amount, is already a part of its expenses on the Income Statement. Finding some hidden worth in that R&D, the acquiror is now willing to pay 150K over and above the book value of the acquiree's firm to get a hold of it.

    • @user-sm1fh1iy4p
      @user-sm1fh1iy4p 3 месяца назад

      Thus this R&D is a part of the FMV-BV component and will only reflect as an amortizable item on the consolidated balance sheet. The other place this 150k will be embedded is in the Investment account on the parent's standalone books. This has nothing to do with the actual R&D expense incurred buy the subsidiary.