As a physical therapist , would you say that you use more modalities in treatment from what you learned in your formal PT training/education or more from the PRI perspective. Your knowledge in my opinion seems to be above what I seem to notice coming from many other physical therapist out there. It is great you demonstrate understanding of neurology and nervous system versus just musculoskeletal system. Looking forward to your response. 🙏
Hey, thanks for watching. If the question is directed towards Josh park the physical therapist in the episode then I would send him a DM on IG @jparkdpt In terms of my approach I purposely consider and describe what I do as training to stay in my line. That training does include influences from PRI but it looks very different and almost never occurs on a table. I operate on the gym floor. Does that answer your question?
Interesting that the negative Ober's = compromised hip capsule because typically that tests for more 'superficial' tightness/restriction (eg. IT band and lateral tissue). Any thoughts?
The adduction drop test is all about assessing pelvic positioning and not IT band tension. That is how it is taught through PRI. You can search adduction drop test in google or youtube to find more. Looking into PRI directly and Ron Hruska who created it is a great idea also
@@2fastnfurious4u Amen my friend. Amen. I found Alex Effer to be an incredibly valuable bridge for me to bills approach. They are very different but he has been able to help me understand bill through his approach. We had him on as a guest coach for our mobility coach plus course. ruclips.net/video/34eL0DkRCmA/видео.html
Hey! Thanks for watching. Glad to hear you felt great after our intro. The elite video membership does not cover jaw exercises but as you have found with the Pelvis work you can make huge gains without even thinking about your jaw. It’s really a very individual thing meaning there is a good chance it’s not holding you back
I love that you guys are putting information out on this and I’m not hating. I too am a PRI minded individual. But @11:55 I potentially disagree with that statement of ligament laxity. He didn’t even do an extension drop test. If you go back to myokineomatic restoration, we know that you will have hip (Iliofemoral / pubefemoral ligament) laxity if you have a positive adduction drop test and a negative extension drop test. You can have a neutral pelvis and still present right BC pattern activity. Especially if you’ve been doing PRI activities that have been repositioning the pelvis but haven’t fully addressed/resolved a neck and jaw (or visual system) that may be driving your patterning from the top down. I assume he’s thinking that the pelvis is forward on the left because of limitation in a straight leg raise. From what I saw I don’t feel like he was consistent enough with his testing. He’s going off his own feeling of limitation alone for the first test of SLR, not with the patient’s input as well on the first round. Later he asks for input after the intervention on the second SLR test. This is meant to be objective. I would add more of an objective measure by seeing how the patient may choose to compensate if the leg is taken further back, to verify my feel of tension/end range: like if the hip decides to orient to that side (opposite legs thigh would come off the table) or an inability to keep the testing sides leg from going into ER. For the horizontal shoulder abduction test when he put the lenses on it appeared that he didn’t keep the test arm at the level of the shoulder, but slightly below 90°. These inconsistencies in testing make it hard to determine improvement or lack of, and can lead those with a critical eye think that no ROM improvements are present, but rather it be his inconsistent testing with an assuming hand. **Edit spelling, grammar and clarity
The occupital lobe of one side of your brain interpretes information from both of your eyes in one directional visual field. You would be incorrect to say that blocking an eye causes a contralateral side inhibition.
Love your contents! You always so open to take different perspective.
I appreciate that! Huge part of my mission. Thanks for watching
As a physical therapist , would you say that you use more modalities in treatment from what you learned in your formal PT training/education or more from the PRI perspective. Your knowledge in my opinion seems to be above what I seem to notice coming from many other physical therapist out there. It is great you demonstrate understanding of neurology and nervous system versus just musculoskeletal system. Looking forward to your response. 🙏
Hey, thanks for watching. If the question is directed towards Josh park the physical therapist in the episode then I would send him a DM on IG @jparkdpt
In terms of my approach I purposely consider and describe what I do as training to stay in my line. That training does include influences from PRI but it looks very different and almost never occurs on a table. I operate on the gym floor.
Does that answer your question?
Interesting that the negative Ober's = compromised hip capsule because typically that tests for more 'superficial' tightness/restriction (eg. IT band and lateral tissue). Any thoughts?
The adduction drop test is all about assessing pelvic positioning and not IT band tension. That is how it is taught through PRI. You can search adduction drop test in google or youtube to find more. Looking into PRI directly and Ron Hruska who created it is a great idea also
Excellent info fellas!
Thanks for watching Chris! Appreciate it
It would be nice to see someone with real right BC left AIC pattern assessed and what corrections should be made
Will put it on the film list! In the meantime i would go to the source which is PRI and check out their courses.
@@IanMarkow Tnx, I dived deep into Bill Hartman's system, though it's not easy to get it lol
@@2fastnfurious4u Amen my friend. Amen. I found Alex Effer to be an incredibly valuable bridge for me to bills approach. They are very different but he has been able to help me understand bill through his approach. We had him on as a guest coach for our mobility coach plus course.
ruclips.net/video/34eL0DkRCmA/видео.html
I love this Ian, I did your pelvis intro and my low back has never felt better.
Do you go into jaw exercise stuff in your premium platform
Hey! Thanks for watching. Glad to hear you felt great after our intro. The elite video membership does not cover jaw exercises but as you have found with the Pelvis work you can make huge gains without even thinking about your jaw. It’s really a very individual thing meaning there is a good chance it’s not holding you back
I love that you guys are putting information out on this and I’m not hating. I too am a PRI minded individual. But @11:55 I potentially disagree with that statement of ligament laxity. He didn’t even do an extension drop test. If you go back to myokineomatic restoration, we know that you will have hip (Iliofemoral / pubefemoral ligament) laxity if you have a positive adduction drop test and a negative extension drop test. You can have a neutral pelvis and still present right BC pattern activity. Especially if you’ve been doing PRI activities that have been repositioning the pelvis but haven’t fully addressed/resolved a neck and jaw (or visual system) that may be driving your patterning from the top down. I assume he’s thinking that the pelvis is forward on the left because of limitation in a straight leg raise. From what I saw I don’t feel like he was consistent enough with his testing. He’s going off his own feeling of limitation alone for the first test of SLR, not with the patient’s input as well on the first round. Later he asks for input after the intervention on the second SLR test. This is meant to be objective. I would add more of an objective measure by seeing how the patient may choose to compensate if the leg is taken further back, to verify my feel of tension/end range: like if the hip decides to orient to that side (opposite legs thigh would come off the table) or an inability to keep the testing sides leg from going into ER. For the horizontal shoulder abduction test when he put the lenses on it appeared that he didn’t keep the test arm at the level of the shoulder, but slightly below 90°. These inconsistencies in testing make it hard to determine improvement or lack of, and can lead those with a critical eye think that no ROM improvements are present, but rather it be his inconsistent testing with an assuming hand. **Edit spelling, grammar and clarity
Thanks for watching and thanks for taking the time to write out your thoughts so clearly. A lot of great points.
Do you wear the mouthpiece all the time or only when doing the exercises?
Mostly when doing the exercises
Wow. What a great video. Loved it! What were the glasses Josh was using? Just any colored lens glasses?
Thanks for watching. Reach out to josh directly on IG or through his website linked in the description.
Awesome thanks
No problem! Thanks for watching. We have a new one of these dropping soon so don’t forget to subscribe
Mindblowing stuff :D
Thanks for watching!
The occupital lobe of one side of your brain interpretes information from both of your eyes in one directional visual field. You would be incorrect to say that blocking an eye causes a contralateral side inhibition.
Okay feel free to take that up with PRI! Thanks for watching
If you remember MLB pitchers did the mouthguard thing a few years back.. neck tension.. tension... very interesting stuff
Its all connected! Thanks for watching.