Creating Google-Friendly Content With ChatGPT

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024

Комментарии • 32

  • @breyonbradford3404
    @breyonbradford3404 Год назад +1

    Hey Mike, GREAT CONTENT AS USUAL!!! In the description, you stated that as of March 13, 2023, you modified this prompt to get it to perform more consistently with recent ChatGPT updates. Is the modified promo the one above?

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      Hey Breyon. The modified version is the one in the description. It's slightly different from what I used in the video. RUclips doesn't allow for any editing once a video is published, so I couldn't edit it out and put the new one in. Use what I put in the video description instead.

  • @FlemmingCLund
    @FlemmingCLund Год назад +1

    Awesome stuff, thanks. It's interesting how almost day by day you realize how insane and beneficial this technology actually is.

  • @Samex4rill
    @Samex4rill Год назад +1

    This is insane ❤️

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      Glad you found it useful.

  • @MariaTukhas
    @MariaTukhas Год назад +1

    Wow this is incredible! A few questions please - 1) did you run the ouput via AI detector? Does it show up as human content or what is the ratio? 2) What in your opinion is the future of these pre-trained models? Is there a way to "buy it as a template" type of thing? As after watching this I understand how cool that is and would love just to get the pre-trained model and start writing on the topic instead of priming it myself😅

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад +3

      1) I did not. I have never been worried if AI generated content was detectable or not.
      2) I'm sure as the ChatGPT API is now available someone will create templates or the ability to create your own templates for this sort of thing. I believe there are some Chrome browser extensions that will let you save prompts or run through a series of prompts as well. My testing with those has been very limited.

    • @MariaTukhas
      @MariaTukhas Год назад +1

      @@TheSEOPub Wonderful! Why not worried about the first one if not a secret? Everyone seems to be so obsessed with measuring how much AI detection it shows?

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад +3

      @@MariaTukhas I really don't understand why people are obsessed with that. The only reason I could see why someone would care is if they are taking jobs as a writer and don't want their clients to know that they did not write the majority of the work they submitted.
      Outside of that, I truly don't understand why anyone cares. Google doesn't, so why obsess over it?

  • @LifeIsATest4TheHereafter
    @LifeIsATest4TheHereafter Год назад

    Great video. I have a question though. Would it be okay if I were to feed gpt4 with my own researched info or expertise as part of a prompt, and have it write the paragraph for me? I'll then fine-tune the next prompt for a much more detailed response or reasoning from gpt4 (section by section), followed by me manually editing or paraphrasing the responses myself for fact-checking & readability.
    Or would you recommend having gpt4 drafting out the paragraph, and me manually editing the paragraphs for added info? The first method truly does save a lot of time tho and gpt4's ability to reason and provide nuances from the info input is definitely something.

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      Yeah, the more instruction and data you give it in a prompt the more useable the output will be.

    • @LifeIsATest4TheHereafter
      @LifeIsATest4TheHereafter Год назад

      ​@@TheSEOPub okay. which method would you personally recommend? Having it write the content based on the detailed info, nuances and instructions fed into the prompt? or manually edit gpt4's first basic draft with info, and nuances ourselves? I find the first method extremely timesaving though

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад +1

      @@LifeIsATest4TheHereafter That's entirely up to you. Whichever is best meeting your needs and goals.

    • @LifeIsATest4TheHereafter
      @LifeIsATest4TheHereafter Год назад

      ​@@TheSEOPub thanks for your responses so far. Either method will do just fine in terms of ranking on Google from an seo standpoint. Correct?

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      @@LifeIsATest4TheHereafter Rankings have more to do with how well the page is optimized than how it was generated.

  • @Jay-sy5yf
    @Jay-sy5yf Год назад +1

    Bro. Bro. Bro!

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      Great app. Can't believe it sold for $60 million.

  • @johnf.renner3577
    @johnf.renner3577 Год назад

    what is the latest Google helpful content update we should use to insert as text to guide Chat? There have been numerous updates since August of 2022 which cover a variety of topics. Is there a newer update you suggest we use?

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      Honestly, just whichever one or ones you feel are important. You could even write your own bullet points summarizing the helpful content update or updates and just feed that in.

    • @johnf.renner3577
      @johnf.renner3577 Год назад

      @@TheSEOPub I feel the one you used from August of 2022 is a good one. Has it been superseded since then or is it still a good resource to use? Are you still using it?

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      @@johnf.renner3577 I had ChatGPT summarize it in bullet points and I use that.

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      @@johnf.renner3577 That one should be fine. I think the only update they may have made after that was adding some information about AI generated content, but that is not necessary.

  • @mslug9999
    @mslug9999 Год назад

    that's great. it's true that chatgpt remembers just the first 4000 words?

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      I think it is 4096 credits which comes out to about 3000 words.

    • @manidipchakrabarty743
      @manidipchakrabarty743 Год назад

      Hey Mike,
      Does that mean the instructions above the fold must be within 3000 words, and named separately.
      Amazing content once again 👍

    • @TheSEOPub
      @TheSEOPub  Год назад

      @@manidipchakrabarty743 I don't know what you mean by "above the fold". It means that after 3000 words, ChatGPT is potentially not storing previous prompts. It's not a big deal for this. Even if you wanted to feed it a lot more documents and information, all you would do is take all the summarized points into a new chat and use them there. You will be well under 3000 words.

    • @manidipchakrabarty743
      @manidipchakrabarty743 Год назад +1

      @@TheSEOPub You nailed it Mike. Exactly the answer I wanted to know. Now do us a favor and make the video unlisted so that we few do not have much competition 😂. Keep it up Boss.