Problem is with excess co2 not absorbed and hence increase greenhouse games resulting global warning etc. Natural co2 is good in environment. We have excess due to burning fossil fuels.
Anaerobic digestion is fine for lets say animal farms to digesting waste products. But those waste products are best suited as natural fertilizers for the farm and others. Inhibiting the production of feed for the animals and relying on corporate fertilizers and feed. And growing crops for anaerobic digesting makes no sense. You take plants that thrive on CO2 and make oxygen tp produce gas that produces CO2 when we have hundreds of years of it under our feet. We do not have a gas problem. We have a politically correct problem.
but if you use plants that takes up CO2 and burn the waste product that releases CO2, that's a net-zero operation. Taking what's in the ground and releasing the CO2 that's been stored for millions of years is not net-zero. That's not a politically correct fact. That's just good accounting. Why do you hate good accounting?
@@bretnoecker758 The exact same thing that happens when you burn oil or gas. I am in favor Anaerobic digestion. But only at a farm or small scale level.
@@bretnoecker758 Because they are fine to be used for waste products like manure. But when you have to start growing thousands of acres of corn or other products to make biogas instead of feeding people or livestock. You have the same situation as growing corn or beans to mane ethanol. That has driven up the cost of all products that feed people and livestock.
@@charleslloyd4253 but most of the corn grown isn't for human consumption....it's for animal food. So why not process the waste product of that? Why not use city solid waste and landfill organics too? Why not build 1000's of these and use the miles of pipelines we already have?
The CO2 produced can be used for fuel (lipid) algae production. Even the "waste" sludges have value.
Man I’ve had this idea for so long. So amazing to see it being optimized and engineered Bravo 👏🏼
Incredible work on scale. Im doing a backyard version for my farm
Rhis is excellent, i am From india telangana hyderabad
Bravo.
Finally keep it up
Am also using plug flow but this seems good too: how can I aquire one in east Africa?
What is the cost of mini plant and per day how much content should be fed
Are you supplying your project to india
hydrothermal liquefaction process remains the fastest means
Oh do you sell one for about 1 to 2 people small home
Sir I have a question. What happens to Co2 produced ? If it Is released in air , it will increase pollution further.
With out CO2 all plants will die,🤔
Problem is with excess co2 not absorbed and hence increase greenhouse games resulting global warning etc. Natural co2 is good in environment. We have excess due to burning fossil fuels.
Most biogas systems have filters to capture the co2 and hydrogen sulfide before the methane is burned
Antec do export this plant system please share contact
We like to know more
4:41 😮
From india telangana hyderabad
Theis iz cutting edgze tekmolozee.
Anaerobic digestion is fine for lets say animal farms to digesting waste products. But those waste products are best suited as natural fertilizers for the farm and others. Inhibiting the production of feed for the animals and relying on corporate fertilizers and feed. And growing crops for anaerobic digesting makes no sense. You take plants that thrive on CO2 and make oxygen tp produce gas that produces CO2 when we have hundreds of years of it under our feet. We do not have a gas problem. We have a politically correct problem.
but if you use plants that takes up CO2 and burn the waste product that releases CO2, that's a net-zero operation. Taking what's in the ground and releasing the CO2 that's been stored for millions of years is not net-zero. That's not a politically correct fact. That's just good accounting. Why do you hate good accounting?
@@bretnoecker758 The exact same thing that happens when you burn oil or gas. I am in favor Anaerobic digestion. But only at a farm or small scale level.
@@charleslloyd4253 why not at a utility scale that produces 1000 MTPD or more? Why should they be limited in scale?
@@bretnoecker758 Because they are fine to be used for waste products like manure. But when you have to start growing thousands of acres of corn or other products to make biogas instead of feeding people or livestock. You have the same situation as growing corn or beans to mane ethanol. That has driven up the cost of all products that feed people and livestock.
@@charleslloyd4253 but most of the corn grown isn't for human consumption....it's for animal food. So why not process the waste product of that? Why not use city solid waste and landfill organics too? Why not build 1000's of these and use the miles of pipelines we already have?