How to Devour a Research Paper in Seconds | Fast and Easy Technique!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июн 2024
- In this video, I'll share my personal strategies on how to read a research paper quickly and efficiently. If you've ever felt overwhelmed trying to figure out how to write a research paper or how to read journal articles, this guide is for you. I'll walk you through my process of dissecting a research paper, focusing on the sections that give you the most important information in the least amount of time.
▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
andrewstapleton.com.au/newsle...
▼ ▽ MY COURSES AND EBOOKS ▼ ▽
▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12 Point Success System for Aspiring PhDs to start your PhD strong: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ My best RUclips advice curated into an an easy to follow course, Effortless Academia: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE PhD application resource pack to apply with confidence: www.subscribepage.com/freeapp...
▶ Learn what I wish I had known before starting my PhD in my ebook bundle: academiainsider.com/ebook-bun...
Understanding research methodology can be daunting, but I'll break it down into simple, manageable steps. This approach is essential whether you're a high school student or pursuing a PhD. Knowing how to read a research paper quickly can make a huge difference in managing your workload and understanding complex material.
A key part of any research paper is the literature review and introduction, and I'll show you how to tackle this efficiently. By learning how to read research papers efficiently, you'll save countless hours and enhance your comprehension of the subject matter.
Reading research doesn't have to be a chore. I'll share tips on how to read journal articles efficiently, making your academic journey smoother and more productive. These techniques have helped me tremendously, and I'm confident they'll help you too.
Beyond just reading and writing papers, these skills are vital for anyone planning a career in research or academia. By mastering these techniques, you'll be better prepared for any academic challenge, from high school projects to doctoral theses.
Whether you're just starting out or looking to improve your existing skills, this video is packed with practical advice and tips to help you read and write research papers more effectively. Let's dive in and make your research process easier and more efficient!
................................................
▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Intro
00:09 Looking at the bottom
01:10 Where to go from there
06:08 Looking at another paper
08:51 More tips
09:52 Authors
10:55 The take home message
................................................
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ Recommended Apps, Books and Courses: academiainsider.com/recommend...
AI TOOLS
▶ Best PhD Writing Tool - Writefull - link.andrewstapleton.com.au/w... (Get 10% off with my link)
▶ Best Literature Search - Litmaps - app.litmaps.co (Get 10% off with code STAPLETON)
▶ Best Literature Review Writing Tool - Jenni.ai - jenni.ai/ (Get 20% off with code ANDY20)
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED RUclips TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ VidIQ - vidiq.com/drandy
▶ Camera - Canon EOS 650D amzn.to/3aDOog6
▶ On camera mic - amzn.to/3iMTzx0
▶ Webcam - amzn.to/43a8YyP
▶ Shotgun microphone - amzn.to/34gzcUX
▶ Portable recorder - amzn.to/3kUzF53
▶ Lighting - amzn.to/2YgbAfv
▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels
Instagram: / drandystapleton
TikTok: / drandystapleton
![How write a research paper in a weekend [My AI Sprint Framework]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dPRNzPtgOeI/mqdefault.jpg)
![How write a research paper in a weekend [My AI Sprint Framework]](/img/tr.png)
Well, some papers you need to dig deeper than the abstract. As most abstracts are exaggerated to a point It it’s almost unethical.
Can you do a video on business or marketing related paper?
Thank you Dr. Andy,
I like!
Awesome
Fantastic tips. Thanks for posting. What software do you typically use to markup PDFs and save them for future reference? Not everyone has adobe acrobat pro. Do you use "snip and sketch" to cut and paste the figures into PPT file as mentioned at the end of your video?
I fully agree with most of the video, except the part about not reading the method section. One of the main reasons we publish is to allow others to replicate or build on our work. I think you should advise PhDs to take extra time in reading this section. With this advice in mind, it is no wonder why most experiments cannot be replicated.
Being a methods guy, I love it when people skip the methods. That means when they have their own data to analyze, they come to me and write the methods and results. They do the hard part, I crunch the numbers. I get a pub. You're right though, you should absolutely read the methods. I read it right after then abstract. If the methods suck, the findings are immediately suspicious.
Pretty easy to read your own paper just saying. BUT you should do a paper that you would mark up and need to know as well as who ever did the paper but one that isn't your own.
Hey Andy, what do you prefer for research? Chatgpt 4 or perplexity pro? Cheers mate.
I do this during my lit reviews for papers.
#Objection
I am an epidemiologist. I am more attracted to tables and methods!
I need to replicate as far as I can the methods so I can compare how my results change in the population I work with.
Yes I raised my eyebrow at that. For my field methods are the most important (I suppose partially because they can sometimes be so bad that you can entirely dismiss the results lol).
Sorry if I missed it - but what pdf markup software are you using here?
I will re-watch to try figure it out
Foxit PDF reader
@@flingnflythanks!
Besiddes these videos are you still engaged in academic reaserch?
What’s really annoying is the acronyms. Most of them are unnecessary.
????? All acronyms are introduced once.... It makes the reading painful otherwise.... It is the norm....
@@boredscientist5756 yes. But as I mentioned, most of them are not necessary. Also, maybe a table would be better so there’s one place for it.
@@keerthanrrao579 specialists know the acronyms by heart .... I don't see any problem
@@keerthanrrao579 most of them ARE necessary, are you still a student? For us researchers, SEM, EDS, TEM, XRD, TOC, DSC, TMA, NMR, FTIR, DCDC etc makes total sense, and it would be totally ridiculous to write the full name more than once. You just make no sense......
@@boredscientist5756 chill out. I get your perspective. I guess we’re simply seeing it from different perspectives here. It’s convenient to list a bunch of popular acronyms that support your argument. And as I mentioned in my reply, maybe a table for it right at the beginning would do wonders. And chill out again. Not sure why you need to take it personally or keep editing your responses.
Unless you’re from one of the top ten universities in the world, nobody (especially journalists who report on science) gives a toss about what you write anyway. It’s automatically considered lacking in credibility or to be taken with a grain of salt. If more academics realised this, fewer people would waste their life and earning potential there. Not to mention sanity.
This is so wrong, it only depends on the field and the team. MIT or Stanford would have no chance in my field, they are barely peasants. I now work in a top 8 Univ, and trust me, they are very far from my 2 previous teams...VERY far.
You can have "low" rank universities who are world leaders in a specific field, I have many examples! The ranking is MEANINGLESS.
I really doubt that you know how researchers work together. Even NASA worked with my 2 previous teams (THEY came to us, because we were just the best in the world)... Same goes for Cambridge or MIT. To get my current position, it was uberly easy considering my background in a "low" ranked university, go figure.
People should stop taking QS rankings too seriously, and realize that good researchers do not give a damn.
@@boredscientist5756 The public only cares about the names of institutions they recognise (and keep hearing) and journalists know this too. Don’t even get me started on non-Western institutions which have basically ZERO credibility even in the minds of their own people.