@@Carlos.Explains I don’t know why you aren’t hitting your stride with the algorithm yet but if you keep it up, it’s gotta tip at some point. It’s weird how many views you’ve had on some of your videos without getting a that bump. I hope all is well with you. Btw, love the Oroboros on your logo. Have you ever engaged with Dr Ian Mcgilchrist’s material about the split brain? His book The Master and His Emissary hits on the physiological basis for the Lingham/yoni lecture that Jordan gave. For the short version (even if you’ve already read his book) search “RSA Animate the divided brain”. I’d love to hear your take on it.
@@Tstorm731 Thanks a lot! Hoping over time I can figure this algorithm out. Not in a rush. :) Thanks for the recommendation. Just watched that video (linked below for folks). Incredible production, and I thought my stuff was dense! Will take a couple viewings for it all to soak in. It certainly rings true and seems related to the edge of chaos as well. As Mcgilchrist points out, it feels like there is in imbalance in the modern world. We need to balance the rational with the intuitive. Just added The Master and His Emissary to my reading list. Thanks again! ruclips.net/video/dFs9WO2B8uI/видео.html
@@Carlos.Explains I’m glad it struck a chord. I need to re-read it myself. I think it’s been about 8 years. It’s great seeing people put their hat in the arena. I’ve been trying to get the courage to start a channel myself. You have both inspired and intimidated me with the quality of your content. I hope all is well in your world.
@@Tstorm731 Thanks! And you should man! Biggest thing is to just get started and not worry about what other people think. Gotta be willing to be a fool before you can be a master...
This was exactly what I was looking for without knowing exactly what question to ask. Wonderful video. You should look up viral evolution. Viruses are pushed to the edge of chaos because the more mutations they can make, the faster they adapt to immunity. But just a little more, and they fall off the adaptive cliff into an error catastrophy. One strategy for anti viral drugs is to increase mutation rate to push them off this cliff.
I can't tell you how much I appreciated this video! Over the past several years I've investigated and dabbled with various simulations, and I've been trying to put my finger on many of the concepts and quirks I observed. Though I've run across a fair amount of the information in the video before, I definitely hadn't seen it all, and I also hadn't seen things tied together so expertly. This was an amazing, and inspirational, watch, and thanks again for making it!
@@Carlos.Explains I'm glad to hear you are familiar with it! I got interested in Lenia primarily because I'm interested to see just how much complexity can arise from relatively simple systems. After coming across reaction-diffusion systems years ago and trying to code stuff up, I've seen some neat things but ultimately not that much complexity. Then I came across Lenia, and I was blown away by the "creatures" that managed to emerge. I'm wondering if using that kind of approach, with cellular automata and kernels instead of reactions and diffusion, would be more fruitful to get things to evolve. When I get some time I might try to tinker with Lenia and put the other stuff I had with Gray-Scott reaction-diffusion on the back burner...
I believe this has to be one of the greatest informational videos that has been created.. we would have to live in a sane world to recognize the value of it of course..
WOW!!!! BRILLIANT!!! Inspiring, and sooo cool!!! I just found your channel and am glued to it, can already feel my brain re-wiring itself!!! MUCHÍSIMAS GRACIAS and keep up the stellar work!! ❤
Great Video makes sense of my life NOW on the Edge. Wish I had that stronger foundation though, for the firmly planted foot💁🏼♀️oh well .. it makes more sense to me now at least. Thanks 💜
Thank you for the informative content. Is the goal here to find the marginal point of where a system turns? Is there a way mathematically to find where this point exists given a specific data set?
Jordan Peterson takes money from right wing political misinformation campaigns to spread conspiratorial ideas and pseudoscience. He abandoned the noble field of scientific inquiry when he decided that money was more important than the pursuit of truth. In my mind, this makes his work a potential source of false and manipulative information and thus I don’t think that it’s useful for us to entertain his ideas in any capacity. I would say the same thing about a left leaning political talking-head as well. There is a high chance of bias and manipulated information from such sources, which would only be a hinderance to any real scientific progress.
The thesis you cited applies perfectly to consciousness. I.e., that self-conscious systems, in order to develop most effectively, should be in a permanent state of doubt, because then they enter a perfect state of creation. In practice, this would mean that a scientist maximizes his cognitive effort when he is constantly changing his perspective on the problem he is working on. Consciousness as a complex self-regulating system that utilizes feedback loops would solve any complex scientific issue in the blink of an eye, with the help of constantly balancing chaos and order, wouldn't it?
Chaos creates pressure, pressure is alleviated by order. This dance goes both ways. Order returns to chaos with time and energy, chaos refilters all manners in which to alleviate chaos, ie us, knowers of 😇 and 👿
This video was somewhat interesting until the reference to Jordan Peterson. His work is not credible and he has proven himself to be a source of misinformation.
I disagree with JP on quite a few things, but in this case I think he nails it. But thanks for the feedback, I know he is polarizing and it may be a better idea to synthesize his ideas than to include a full clip.
@@Carlos.Explains I don’t know what is worse, sourceless information or information that came from a source that has proven to lack credibility. If you want to make content that discerning, intelligent people will find useful, you should really avoid any reference to political talking heads like Jordan Peterson. He is directly associated with right wing misinformation campaigns, as is evident by the massive amounts of money that he has been publicly paid by special interest groups. He was a scientist that embraced political dogma for money, he has lost all respect in the scientific community (rightly so) and you should never give his name the power of leaving your lips if the integrity of science is important to you in any capacity whatsoever.
@@Carlos.Explains Appreciate the reply. My suggestion would be to caveat referencing him with a mention of why you think his contribution is valid - given that the main reason he's so polarising is because he loves weighing in on fields that he's not an expert in. Coming back to the video, he's clearly talking about psychology, his field. (granted I'm not an expert in complexity or in psychology, but) I'm not entirely sure, though, that translating so immediately between the quantitative sciences and psychology is appropriate without a bit more exploration. Either way, thanks for the video. Good to see complexity/systems dynamics being presented :)
@@mushyfooproductions Thanks for the reply. I have to weigh the value of bringing in a controversial figure versus a wide swath of viewers' aversion to said figure. I'm not interested in endorsing anyone, but rather extracting valuable ideas. Glad you enjoy the topic of complexity/systems dynamics! There will certainly be more videos coming in this domain. =)
@@Carlos.Explains I loved seeing jordan peterson in this video for the record. His book Maps of Meaning is all about how order and chaos relate psychologically.
This is great. Keep up the great work.
Thank you Jason! Much appreciated.
@@Carlos.Explains I don’t know why you aren’t hitting your stride with the algorithm yet but if you keep it up, it’s gotta tip at some point. It’s weird how many views you’ve had on some of your videos without getting a that bump. I hope all is well with you.
Btw, love the Oroboros on your logo. Have you ever engaged with Dr Ian Mcgilchrist’s material about the split brain? His book The Master and His Emissary hits on the physiological basis for the Lingham/yoni lecture that Jordan gave. For the short version (even if you’ve already read his book) search “RSA Animate the divided brain”. I’d love to hear your take on it.
@@Tstorm731 Thanks a lot! Hoping over time I can figure this algorithm out. Not in a rush. :)
Thanks for the recommendation. Just watched that video (linked below for folks). Incredible production, and I thought my stuff was dense! Will take a couple viewings for it all to soak in.
It certainly rings true and seems related to the edge of chaos as well. As Mcgilchrist points out, it feels like there is in imbalance in the modern world. We need to balance the rational with the intuitive.
Just added The Master and His Emissary to my reading list. Thanks again!
ruclips.net/video/dFs9WO2B8uI/видео.html
@@Carlos.Explains I’m glad it struck a chord. I need to re-read it myself. I think it’s been about 8 years.
It’s great seeing people put their hat in the arena. I’ve been trying to get the courage to start a channel myself. You have both inspired and intimidated me with the quality of your content. I hope all is well in your world.
@@Tstorm731 Thanks! And you should man! Biggest thing is to just get started and not worry about what other people think. Gotta be willing to be a fool before you can be a master...
This was exactly what I was looking for without knowing exactly what question to ask. Wonderful video. You should look up viral evolution. Viruses are pushed to the edge of chaos because the more mutations they can make, the faster they adapt to immunity. But just a little more, and they fall off the adaptive cliff into an error catastrophy. One strategy for anti viral drugs is to increase mutation rate to push them off this cliff.
Excellent video -- kept my attention. Fascinating how you reveal the harmony between the science & philosophy aspects.
I can't tell you how much I appreciated this video! Over the past several years I've investigated and dabbled with various simulations, and I've been trying to put my finger on many of the concepts and quirks I observed. Though I've run across a fair amount of the information in the video before, I definitely hadn't seen it all, and I also hadn't seen things tied together so expertly. This was an amazing, and inspirational, watch, and thanks again for making it!
Samter, thank you so much! I will certainly cover more on cellular automata in the future. =)
@@Carlos.Explains That's awesome! I'm sorry if I already brought this up somewhere, but have you heard of Lenia, developed by Bert Chan?
Hey again! Yes, I'm familiar with Lenia. Do you have any thoughts about it?
@@Carlos.Explains I'm glad to hear you are familiar with it! I got interested in Lenia primarily because I'm interested to see just how much complexity can arise from relatively simple systems. After coming across reaction-diffusion systems years ago and trying to code stuff up, I've seen some neat things but ultimately not that much complexity. Then I came across Lenia, and I was blown away by the "creatures" that managed to emerge. I'm wondering if using that kind of approach, with cellular automata and kernels instead of reactions and diffusion, would be more fruitful to get things to evolve. When I get some time I might try to tinker with Lenia and put the other stuff I had with Gray-Scott reaction-diffusion on the back burner...
My favorite kind of things! Brilliant analogies! Respect and thank you!
Highly underrated channel!! Just found it and I’m binging many of your videos
This video was awesome. It is way too advanced for me but I hope to understand in a few years. Keep it up!
I believe this has to be one of the greatest informational videos that has been created..
we would have to live in a sane world to recognize the value of it of course..
Wow @0xDivi, I really appreciate that! Glad you enjoyed it. 😁
Your channel is a gem!
WOW!!!! BRILLIANT!!! Inspiring, and sooo cool!!! I just found your channel and am glued to it, can already feel my brain re-wiring itself!!! MUCHÍSIMAS GRACIAS and keep up the stellar work!! ❤
Great Video makes sense of my life NOW on the Edge.
Wish I had that stronger foundation though, for the firmly planted foot💁🏼♀️oh well .. it makes more sense to me now at least.
Thanks 💜
Keep up brother, you're a very geniune man and producer , thank you
"Ability to selectively communicate information with complex structures in space-time"
Thanks for calling that out! I should have added that as on-screen text because I think it's critical.
This is so cool, great channel, be sure to get Joscha Bach on sometime
Thank you! Haven't heard back from him after a couple emails... might have to try again when the channel has more subs. :)
Bruuhh I love joscha Bach. I’ve listened to his podcasts with lex Friedman too many times to count.
Indeed an amazing explanation.
Thanks for watching!
Thank you for the informative content. Is the goal here to find the marginal point of where a system turns? Is there a way mathematically to find where this point exists given a specific data set?
11:05 that was a good one liner if ever there was one
I love this topic, and it goes together so well with Emergence.
Also, Jordan Peterson is a genius and he hits the yin yang spot on.
Jordan Peterson takes money from right wing political misinformation campaigns to spread conspiratorial ideas and pseudoscience. He abandoned the noble field of scientific inquiry when he decided that money was more important than the pursuit of truth. In my mind, this makes his work a potential source of false and manipulative information and thus I don’t think that it’s useful for us to entertain his ideas in any capacity. I would say the same thing about a left leaning political talking-head as well. There is a high chance of bias and manipulated information from such sources, which would only be a hinderance to any real scientific progress.
The thesis you cited applies perfectly to consciousness. I.e., that self-conscious systems, in order to develop most effectively, should be in a permanent state of doubt, because then they enter a perfect state of creation. In practice, this would mean that a scientist maximizes his cognitive effort when he is constantly changing his perspective on the problem he is working on. Consciousness as a complex self-regulating system that utilizes feedback loops would solve any complex scientific issue in the blink of an eye, with the help of constantly balancing chaos and order, wouldn't it?
Great video!
Woohoo, thanks Amis!
Why is flow
Great video!!!!!
Thanks Jaxon! Sweet... aardvark?
@@Carlos.Explains It’s the logo for the rapper Quasimoto, check him out!
@@jaxonpallone4377 oh of course! It's been forever since I've thought of him.
Chaos creates pressure, pressure is alleviated by order. This dance goes both ways. Order returns to chaos with time and energy, chaos refilters all manners in which to alleviate chaos, ie us, knowers of 😇 and 👿
So poetic!
Love the concepts. Music is distracting and disconnected
Thanks Chris. Taking note on the music. If folks agree, please give his comment a thumbs up.
10:51 That’s not what Anarchy means…
New sub 🎉
@@di.onesandzeros 🥳
1:59_60_2:00
I’m so confused like how is this even stuff I’m wayyy to confused of what’s he’s saying like I’m super confused?!?!
More more more. More
Thanks Peter! I want to cover a lot more in the complexity space...
in search of the architect!
This video was somewhat interesting until the reference to Jordan Peterson. His work is not credible and he has proven himself to be a source of misinformation.
I disagree with JP on quite a few things, but in this case I think he nails it. But thanks for the feedback, I know he is polarizing and it may be a better idea to synthesize his ideas than to include a full clip.
@@Carlos.Explains I don’t know what is worse, sourceless information or information that came from a source that has proven to lack credibility. If you want to make content that discerning, intelligent people will find useful, you should really avoid any reference to political talking heads like Jordan Peterson. He is directly associated with right wing misinformation campaigns, as is evident by the massive amounts of money that he has been publicly paid by special interest groups. He was a scientist that embraced political dogma for money, he has lost all respect in the scientific community (rightly so) and you should never give his name the power of leaving your lips if the integrity of science is important to you in any capacity whatsoever.
Peter jordanson really? lol
Yeah that turned me off :/
@@mushyfooproductions and Alex, thanks for the feedback. I know he's polarizing, but I think he nails the yin/yang connection with order/chaos.
@@Carlos.Explains Appreciate the reply. My suggestion would be to caveat referencing him with a mention of why you think his contribution is valid - given that the main reason he's so polarising is because he loves weighing in on fields that he's not an expert in.
Coming back to the video, he's clearly talking about psychology, his field. (granted I'm not an expert in complexity or in psychology, but) I'm not entirely sure, though, that translating so immediately between the quantitative sciences and psychology is appropriate without a bit more exploration.
Either way, thanks for the video. Good to see complexity/systems dynamics being presented :)
@@mushyfooproductions Thanks for the reply. I have to weigh the value of bringing in a controversial figure versus a wide swath of viewers' aversion to said figure. I'm not interested in endorsing anyone, but rather extracting valuable ideas.
Glad you enjoy the topic of complexity/systems dynamics! There will certainly be more videos coming in this domain. =)
@@Carlos.Explains I loved seeing jordan peterson in this video for the record. His book Maps of Meaning is all about how order and chaos relate psychologically.
I got here following links from hypercube/tesseract videos. Perfect.