I love your videos! I’ve played probably thousands of hands with my computer game Blue Chip Bridge and my impression is that the lead of 4th down against a NT contract rarely works unless you’ve actually got five cards! Would you have any comment on this, please? Incidentally, I can’t recommend Blue Chip Bridge highly enough as a teaching guide but unfortunately it is no longer available.
Thanks for your comments. Yes, leading from a 4-card holding is not as good as leading from a longer suit, and sometimes a more passive lead - perhaps from a worthless 3-card may work out better. Take a look at one of my videos on active vs passive leads ruclips.net/video/r4fCgpJn7Kc/видео.html
@@TonyStawBridgeClass Thank you. Yes, I’ve watched your passive-active video now and learnt a lot (as I always do from your thoughtful videos). How I wished I lived near your club but videos and your handouts will have to do!
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Excellent lesson thank you
You are welcome!
Brillian lesson!
Thanks
I love your videos! I’ve played probably thousands of hands with my computer game Blue Chip Bridge and my impression is that the lead of 4th down against a NT contract rarely works unless you’ve actually got five cards! Would you have any comment on this, please? Incidentally, I can’t recommend Blue Chip Bridge highly enough as a teaching guide but unfortunately it is no longer available.
Thanks for your comments. Yes, leading from a 4-card holding is not as good as leading from a longer suit, and sometimes a more passive lead - perhaps from a worthless 3-card may work out better. Take a look at one of my videos on active vs passive leads ruclips.net/video/r4fCgpJn7Kc/видео.html
@@TonyStawBridgeClass Thank you. Yes, I’ve watched your passive-active video now and learnt a lot (as I always do from your thoughtful videos). How I wished I lived near your club but videos and your handouts will have to do!