our judicial system it's not one of our own but of foreign influence in the aspect that the pole bar association that they have to graduate from to become a lawyer or a judge and at the beginning with is not under our constitutional law that's under maritime law as if we were pirates on the ocean look up the 14th amendment under birthright status! and then look up the meaning of a national foreign citizen! once you get the answer for that. are you questioning whether you're free here or not?
In Texas the many of the STATE District courts are administrative courts working for the U.S Corporation. They work with the J.P.s that are also working for corporate. Many of the jails are contracted to private businesses. Paid by federal grants.
The presumption of personhood comes from the Trading with the Enemy Act. 48 Stat 1 proclaimed all Americans who are not actually naturalized to be alien enemies. 50 USC 23 (Alien Enemy Act pf 1798) is where this jurisdiction comes from and all licenses come from the Trading with the Enemy Act by order of the President.
We don't have constitutional rights . That document is not the grantor of our rights . We have rights . The constitution is notice to governmental bodies aka trustees of thier limitations not ours . You may correctly say constitutionally protected rights .
A good remedy to use in these statute law courts is to declare yourself as an idiot. An idiot in the legal system is an outsider. Idiots have no accountability. That's why they always ask you if you understand the charges. So you would answer, "I do not understand the charges. I'm not part of the legal society. I'm a complete idiot." And just keep repeating that. Act as though you have no idea what they're talking about. I've even known a few cases where people have been let off drug charges when using this method.
They need you to "stand under" Their authority, not "understand" the words they speak. The only thing you say to cops is NO, I DON'T UNDERSTAND. Watch how mad they get when you don't place yourself below them.
JUST WHY WOULD YOU EVEN DEAL WITH THESE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS? The United States Constitution guaranties your "Right" to a, "Common Law Court of Record Trial by Jury (peers)". CRIMINAL OR CIVIL..... [Trial by Jury, and not an Administrative Jury Trial] For Crimes = any jail time that can be imposed. U. S. Con. Article III, Section 2: This section establishes the "judicial power" of the United States and states that the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury. It ensures that criminal trials are conducted fairly and impartially by a jury of peers. Every Court today that are using Statutes and Codes and not the Common Law are acting Administratively and not Judicially. [Legislative = Administrative law = Statutes/Codes/ Policy] THE JUDGE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A "CLERK" FOR THAT AGENCY. [No Judicial Authority] Proof.... Additionally, courts are prohibited from their substituting their judgments for that of the agency.” American Iron and Steel v. United States, 568 F.2d 284. And; “. . . judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise), act as mere “clerks” of the involved agency…” K.C. Davis., ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West’s 1965 Ed.) “…their supposed “courts” becoming thus a court of “limited jurisdiction” as a mere extension of the involved agency for mere superior reviewing purposes.” K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW., P. 95, (CTP, 6 Ed. West’s 1977)> FRC v. G.E., 281 U.S. 464; Keller v. P.E.P., 261 U.S. 428. And; “It is well settled in administrative law that: “It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is enforcing administrative law they are described as mere ‘extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes’ as a ministerial clerk for an agency…” 30 Cal.596; 167 Cal 762. And; ORCP 21(A) (Defenses and Objections, How presented) (Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading, whether a complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim or third party claim, shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion to dismiss: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) lack of jurisdiction over the person,“ A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principals of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments and rationale for that of the agency. For Civil = Twenty Dollars or more... U.S. Con. Seventh Amendment..... "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. These Legislative, Administrative, Limited Jurisdictional Courts, Non-Judicial courts, Non- Judicial Judges (Clerks), "NOT" a Court of Record, must have your consent in order to proceed in any case. Washington State... Where I am at... Proof CONSENT by both parties is required and right to Trial by Jury... Washington State Supreme Court Makes the Rules for All Lower Courts. Washington State Court Rules: Superior Court Criminal, Civil Rules CR 2A STIPULATIONS No agreement or "consent" between parties or attorneys in respect to the proceedings in a cause, the purport of which is disputed, will be regarded by the court unless the same shall have been made and assented to in open court on the record, or entered in the minutes, or unless the evidence thereof shall be in writing and subscribed by the attorneys denying the same. CR 38 JURY TRIAL OF RIGHT (-) Defined. A trial is the judicial examination of the issues between the parties, whether they are issues of law or of fact. (a) Right of Jury Trial Preserved. The right of "trial by jury" as declared by article 1, section 21 of the constitution or as given by a statute shall be preserved to the parties inviolate. (b) Demand for Jury. At or prior to the time the case is called to be set for trial, any party may demand a "trial by jury" of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing, by filing the demand with the clerk, and by paying the jury fee required by law. If before the case is called to be set for trial no party serves or files a demand that the case be tried by a jury of 12, it shall be tried by a jury of 6 members with the concurrence of five being required to reach a verdict. (c) Specification of Issues. A party may specify the issues which the party wishes so tried in a demand; otherwise the party shall be deemed to have demanded trial by jury for all the issues so triable. If a party has demanded trial by jury for only some of the issues, any other party within 10 days after service of the demand or such lesser time as the court may order, may serve a demand for trial by jury of any other or all of the issues of fact in the action. (d) Waiver of Jury. The failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule, to file it as required by this rule, and to pay the jury fee required by law in accordance with this rule, constitutes a waiver by the party of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties. ALWAYS DEMAND YOUR RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY = COMMON LAW COURT OF RECORD TRIAL BY YOUR PEERS FOR CIVIL OR CRIMINAL.... AM I BEING ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A CRIME? WHERE IS THE INDICTMENT? The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution addresses the right to indictment by a grand jury. It states: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..." “The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261. Jan. 17 1963 This case, Washington State Supreme Court Ruling has never been overturned.
As long as the process is the revenue generator regardless of outcome it will never stop. Try not to live in the master nor slave morality for both celebrate cruelty. Do not join their corporations or fight their wars. Your humanity and goodwill has been hijacked for centuries. Try to cause no harm, commit no fraud, and do not steal.
Always hire a court reporter. They behave better, though not perfectly, when they know you can have a transcript produced for an appeal. You’ll need an official transcript for appeal and you need an official record to get that. A recorded court is not the same as a court of record!
Here is how I’d obtain record in a court of non record: I’d personally hire a court reporter and show up with that court reporter to create a record. Problem solved. I believe there is another way to enforce rights: learn how the courts work and use them
@ Jerome 🤣 you think I’m going to read past the word “false” when opening with that word? You wrote a novel. What you could have done instead is to supply evidence for us all by listing names of jurisdictions and case numbers of cases you won with your theories. So please provide at minimum one case for me to look up. Thanks.
The Jurisdictional Paradox: Courts Not of Record, Constitutional Rights, and the Presumption of Legal Personhood a.co/d/05AHqxo Kindle available now. Paperback next week.
Qedemawi Haile Selassie the First and last king of Israel to rule in Jerusalem 1936 Good video as well Give us a like I have a bundle i am about to post today And not yesterday or tomorrow Why 7 / 12 Yesterday would have been to nast- it-up Listen to His Imperial Majesty Rod Taylor Errmm do you mind saying that again Shaka style
***Not legal advice. a.co/d/7b6fcO5 Amazon paperback
Love your voice. Love your voice. Love your voice. Thank you
We are reaching out to Americans to reinhabit the only lawful, de jure, interim Constitutional Republic using common law effectively.
where did the public go when you need to republic?
Demand everything be on the record!
Presumption stands in law until it's rebutted
Nice easily understood presentation of such complex info. So much to learn around all these matters,unknown by most id argue...
Yep, its also so important for us to know that all roads lead to Rome/Romans!
our judicial system it's not one of our own but of foreign influence in the aspect that the pole bar association that they have to graduate from to become a lawyer or a judge and at the beginning with is not under our constitutional law that's under maritime law as if we were pirates on the ocean look up the 14th amendment under birthright status! and then look up the meaning of a national foreign citizen! once you get the answer for that. are you questioning whether you're free here or not?
Well make it your own
Or drop it
Rastaman time
Get UPON it
Stand UPON it
Riiiiiggghhhhhhttt
Funny part is you don't have to go to law school to take the bar in many states
In Texas the many of the STATE District courts are administrative courts working for the U.S Corporation. They work with the J.P.s that are also working for corporate. Many of the jails are contracted to private businesses. Paid by federal grants.
The presumption of personhood comes from the Trading with the Enemy Act. 48 Stat 1 proclaimed all Americans who are not actually naturalized to be alien enemies. 50 USC 23 (Alien Enemy Act pf 1798) is where this jurisdiction comes from and all licenses come from the Trading with the Enemy Act by order of the President.
Educate the people!👍
We don't have constitutional rights .
That document is not the grantor of our rights .
We have rights .
The constitution is notice to governmental bodies aka trustees of thier limitations not ours .
You may correctly say constitutionally protected rights .
agreed...100%
How will anyone’s rights be protected if the person who claims they do have rights don’t know how to protect them through the courts?
Good info. Solutions???
What about the issue called: KIDNAPPING??
Without standing they never have jurisdiction
How is this pertinent to our Declaration of Independence?? Especially regarding the “Spirit” of the Law?
A good remedy to use in these statute law courts is to declare yourself as an idiot. An idiot in the legal system is an outsider. Idiots have no accountability. That's why they always ask you if you understand the charges. So you would answer, "I do not understand the charges. I'm not part of the legal society. I'm a complete idiot." And just keep repeating that. Act as though you have no idea what they're talking about. I've even known a few cases where people have been let off drug charges when using this method.
They need you to "stand under" Their authority, not "understand" the words they speak.
The only thing you say to cops is NO, I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
Watch how mad they get when you don't place yourself below them.
@@daveizms01 Yes but they will still arrest you and take you to court. You have to act as though you don't understand their language.
Where do we get the book?
Google the twelve presumptions of Court PDF and rebut all 12
Google the Clearfield doctrine 2008 PDF
Stay tuned for links to the book. Hopefully be ready in time for the holidays..
JUST WHY WOULD YOU EVEN DEAL WITH THESE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS?
The United States Constitution guaranties your "Right" to a, "Common Law Court of Record Trial by Jury (peers)". CRIMINAL OR CIVIL..... [Trial by Jury, and not an Administrative Jury Trial]
For Crimes = any jail time that can be imposed.
U. S. Con. Article III, Section 2:
This section establishes the "judicial power" of the United States and states that the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury. It ensures that criminal trials are conducted fairly and impartially by a jury of peers.
Every Court today that are using Statutes and Codes and not the Common Law are acting Administratively and not Judicially. [Legislative = Administrative law = Statutes/Codes/ Policy]
THE JUDGE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A "CLERK" FOR THAT AGENCY. [No Judicial Authority]
Proof....
Additionally, courts are prohibited from their substituting their judgments for that of the agency.” American Iron and Steel v. United States, 568 F.2d 284. And; “. . . judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise), act as mere “clerks” of the involved agency…” K.C. Davis., ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West’s 1965 Ed.) “…their supposed “courts” becoming thus a court of “limited jurisdiction” as a mere extension of the involved agency for mere superior reviewing purposes.” K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW., P. 95, (CTP, 6 Ed. West’s 1977)> FRC v. G.E., 281 U.S. 464; Keller v. P.E.P., 261 U.S. 428.
And;
“It is well settled in administrative law that: “It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is enforcing administrative law they are described as mere ‘extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes’ as a ministerial clerk for an agency…” 30 Cal.596; 167 Cal 762.
And;
ORCP 21(A) (Defenses and Objections, How presented) (Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading, whether a complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim or third party claim, shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion to dismiss: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) lack of jurisdiction over the person,“ A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principals of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments and rationale for that of the agency.
For Civil = Twenty Dollars or more...
U.S. Con. Seventh Amendment.....
"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
These Legislative, Administrative, Limited Jurisdictional Courts, Non-Judicial courts, Non- Judicial Judges (Clerks), "NOT" a Court of Record, must have your consent in order to proceed in any case.
Washington State... Where I am at...
Proof CONSENT by both parties is required and right to Trial by Jury...
Washington State Supreme Court Makes the Rules for All Lower Courts.
Washington State Court Rules: Superior Court Criminal, Civil Rules
CR 2A STIPULATIONS
No agreement or "consent" between parties or attorneys in respect to the proceedings in a cause, the purport of which is disputed, will be regarded by the court unless the same shall have been made and assented to in open court on the record, or entered in the minutes, or unless the evidence thereof shall be in writing and subscribed by the attorneys denying the same.
CR 38 JURY TRIAL OF RIGHT
(-) Defined. A trial is the judicial examination of the issues between the parties, whether they are issues of law or of fact.
(a) Right of Jury Trial Preserved. The right of "trial by jury" as declared by article 1, section 21 of the constitution or as given by a statute shall be preserved to the parties inviolate.
(b) Demand for Jury. At or prior to the time the case is called to be set for trial, any party may demand a "trial by jury" of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing, by filing the demand with the clerk, and by paying the jury fee required by law. If before the case is called to be set for trial no party serves or files a demand that the case be tried by a jury of 12, it shall be tried by a jury of 6 members with the concurrence of five being required to reach a verdict.
(c) Specification of Issues. A party may specify the issues which the party wishes so tried in a demand; otherwise the party shall be deemed to have demanded trial by jury for all the issues so triable. If a party has demanded trial by jury for only some of the issues, any other party within 10 days after service of the demand or such lesser time as the court may order, may serve a demand for trial by jury of any other or all of the issues of fact in the action. (d) Waiver of Jury. The failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule, to file it as required by this rule, and to pay the jury fee required by law in accordance with this rule, constitutes a waiver by the party of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties.
ALWAYS DEMAND YOUR RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY = COMMON LAW COURT OF RECORD TRIAL BY YOUR PEERS FOR CIVIL OR CRIMINAL....
AM I BEING ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A CRIME? WHERE IS THE INDICTMENT?
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution addresses the right to indictment by a grand jury. It states:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
“The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261. Jan. 17 1963
This case, Washington State Supreme Court Ruling has never been overturned.
👍🏻
28 USC 3002 Pargarpah 15. Real action. Real results
As long as the process is the revenue generator regardless of outcome it will never stop.
Try not to live in the master nor slave morality for both celebrate cruelty.
Do not join their corporations or fight their wars.
Your humanity and goodwill has been hijacked for centuries.
Try to cause no harm, commit no fraud, and do not steal.
Always hire a court reporter. They behave better, though not perfectly, when they know you can have a transcript produced for an appeal. You’ll need an official transcript for appeal and you need an official record to get that. A recorded court is not the same as a court of record!
Here is how I’d obtain record in a court of non record: I’d personally hire a court reporter and show up with that court reporter to create a record. Problem solved.
I believe there is another way to enforce rights: learn how the courts work and use them
@ Jerome 🤣 you think I’m going to read past the word “false” when opening with that word? You wrote a novel. What you could have done instead is to supply evidence for us all by listing names of jurisdictions and case numbers of cases you won with your theories. So please provide at minimum one case for me to look up. Thanks.
NESARA will do most of that!
No such thing.
What is the name of the book
The Jurisdictional Paradox: Courts Not of Record, Constitutional Rights, and the Presumption of Legal Personhood
Where can i get a copy of this book. I have made several attempts to find it and nothing comes up in the search engine.
The Jurisdictional Paradox: Courts Not of Record, Constitutional Rights, and the Presumption of Legal Personhood a.co/d/05AHqxo
Kindle available now. Paperback next week.
Article 3 clause 2 😊
US district court, what do you mean? This is about administrative courts, has nothing to do with federal courts...
Don't l get my money
Qedemawi Haile Selassie the First and last king of Israel to rule in Jerusalem 1936
Good video as well
Give us a like
I have a bundle i am about to post today
And not yesterday or tomorrow
Why 7 / 12
Yesterday would have been to nast- it-up
Listen to
His Imperial Majesty
Rod Taylor
Errmm do you mind saying that again
Shaka style