Track width of that "tractor" is supposed to be 7 feet. The cart total width is supposed to be about 13 feet on tracks. I doubt that includes the auger extended since the same cart with "flotation" tires has a width of 14 feet which sounds about right for a cart that big with tires that wide given a typical highway "lane" is around 12 feet from shoulder to center line. That cart should also overall length be as long as half of that tractor trailer give or take. There's no way that's a 1300 bushel cart behind that little part-time 4wd wannabe "farm tractor". I drug around a Kinze 1240 on flotation tires behind a JD 9300 for a few months and those carts make big tractors look small and small tractors look tiny. They also weigh empty more than that "tractor" weighs and on tracks they pull like big, blue anchors. Either that cart is smaller than what the specs say by a lot or that "high-speed" so-called "farm tractor" with a 43 mph max speed is way too wide to be "transporting" at those speeds even "empty" which of course is the only way its going to be allowed to do 43 mph just like other "commercial" wheeled "tractors" made for high-speed transport and to be able to be effectively and efficiently and "legally" driven where they cannot be hauled are only allowed to reach top speed in "transport" mode and within the maximum speed/weight ratings of their tires. Deere 4930 and 4940 "commercial applicators" have a 43 mph/35 km/h "empty" transport speed even with some solution in the tank because they're highest empty weights are with dry box spreaders on them. But put any product in one that compresses the suspension "too far" and they drop back to being "slow moving vehicles" because they lack mechanical steering and braking systems and have fuel and hydraulic oil capacities in excess of what a "vocational" commercial vehicle can transport without being placarded and MSDSed and DOT-numbered and "insured" and do not have DOT-approved fuel and/or hydraulic oil tanks. There's also no way those things have "310 PTO HP" at "either end" instead of "both ends combined" given that they're "standard" 540-rpm PTOs and they're kicking the engine speed up 400+ rpm to get a "1000 rpm" PTO speed from 1500-odd RPM. If that were a 175+ HP 1000-rpm PTO it would be 1 3/4" 1000 "standard" and would be rated at 2100-2200 engine rpm so it could spin 540 at 1250 engine rpm or so and have "half" its rated PTO horsepower at about half its engine rated horsepower and high-idle speed. Just like 150 hp is kind of the maximum "safe" PTO "POWER LEVEL" ONCE TORQUE-RISE IS FIGURED IN WITH A 1 3/8 SHAFT, 300 IS ABOUT THE LIMIT WITH AN 1 3/4 SHAFT DUE TO ANGULARITY AND DRIVELINE WEIGHT AND "CRITICAL SPEEDS". WHICH IS WHY BIG ROW-CROPS AND FOUR WHEEL DRIVES ARE "TORQUE LIMITED" WITH THE PTO ON AND THE TRACTOR IN MOTION AND WITHOUT A 600 HP PTO DYNO WITH A 3600 LB-FT. DRIVELINE YOU CAN'T "DYNO" THEM DOING A FULL TORQUE-RISE PULL AND THEY'RE RATED FOR FLYWHEEL GROSS HORSEPOWER WHICH WITH AN EFFICIENT AND WELL-ENGINEERED PTO DRIVETRAIN THEY SHOULD PRODUCE AT "PTO RATED SPEED" WHEN DOING A "TORQUE-RISE" PULL FROM HIGH IDLE TO RATED ENGINE SPEED TO PTO SPEED. THAT'S THE ONLY WAY TO GET "RATED HORSEPOWER" AT A SPECIFIC ENGINE AND/OR PTO SPEED. START AT HIGH IDLE AND "NO LOAD" AND LOAD THE PTO AND ENGINE UNTIL SPEEDS DROP TO RATED SPEEDS. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS HORSEPOWER WITHOUT TORQUE AND "SPEED" BUT TORQUE CAN EXIST WITHOUT SHAFT ROTATION AND "SPEED" RESULTING IN "0 HORSEPOWER" BECAUSE TORQUE IS FORCE AND ACTUAL "POWER" AND "HORSEPOWER" IS JUST A "RATE".
![Natanael Cano - Amor Eterno [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EO4prCs6WpM/mqdefault.jpg)
Track width of that "tractor" is supposed to be 7 feet. The cart total width is supposed to be about 13 feet on tracks. I doubt that includes the auger extended since the same cart with "flotation" tires has a width of 14 feet which sounds about right for a cart that big with tires that wide given a typical highway "lane" is around 12 feet from shoulder to center line. That cart should also overall length be as long as half of that tractor trailer give or take. There's no way that's a 1300 bushel cart behind that little part-time 4wd wannabe "farm tractor". I drug around a Kinze 1240 on flotation tires behind a JD 9300 for a few months and those carts make big tractors look small and small tractors look tiny.
They also weigh empty more than that "tractor" weighs and on tracks they pull like big, blue anchors. Either that cart is smaller than what the specs say by a lot or that "high-speed" so-called "farm tractor" with a 43 mph max speed is way too wide to be "transporting" at those speeds even "empty" which of course is the only way its going to be allowed to do 43 mph just like other "commercial" wheeled "tractors" made for high-speed transport and to be able to be effectively and efficiently and "legally" driven where they cannot be hauled are only allowed to reach top speed in "transport" mode and within the maximum speed/weight ratings of their tires.
Deere 4930 and 4940 "commercial applicators" have a 43 mph/35 km/h "empty" transport speed even with some solution in the tank because they're highest empty weights are with dry box spreaders on them. But put any product in one that compresses the suspension "too far" and they drop back to being "slow moving vehicles" because they lack mechanical steering and braking systems and have fuel and hydraulic oil capacities in excess of what a "vocational" commercial vehicle can transport without being placarded and MSDSed and DOT-numbered and "insured" and do not have DOT-approved fuel and/or hydraulic oil tanks.
There's also no way those things have "310 PTO HP" at "either end" instead of "both ends combined" given that they're "standard" 540-rpm PTOs and they're kicking the engine speed up 400+ rpm to get a "1000 rpm" PTO speed from 1500-odd RPM. If that were a 175+ HP 1000-rpm PTO it would be 1 3/4" 1000 "standard" and would be rated at 2100-2200 engine rpm so it could spin 540 at 1250 engine rpm or so and have "half" its rated PTO horsepower at about half its engine rated horsepower and high-idle speed.
Just like 150 hp is kind of the maximum "safe" PTO "POWER LEVEL" ONCE TORQUE-RISE IS FIGURED IN WITH A 1 3/8 SHAFT, 300 IS ABOUT THE LIMIT WITH AN 1 3/4 SHAFT DUE TO ANGULARITY AND DRIVELINE WEIGHT AND "CRITICAL SPEEDS". WHICH IS WHY BIG ROW-CROPS AND FOUR WHEEL DRIVES ARE "TORQUE LIMITED" WITH THE PTO ON AND THE TRACTOR IN MOTION AND WITHOUT A 600 HP PTO DYNO WITH A 3600 LB-FT. DRIVELINE YOU CAN'T "DYNO" THEM DOING A FULL TORQUE-RISE PULL AND THEY'RE RATED FOR FLYWHEEL GROSS HORSEPOWER WHICH WITH AN EFFICIENT AND WELL-ENGINEERED PTO DRIVETRAIN THEY SHOULD PRODUCE AT "PTO RATED SPEED" WHEN DOING A "TORQUE-RISE" PULL FROM HIGH IDLE TO RATED ENGINE SPEED TO PTO SPEED.
THAT'S THE ONLY WAY TO GET "RATED HORSEPOWER" AT A SPECIFIC ENGINE AND/OR PTO SPEED. START AT HIGH IDLE AND "NO LOAD" AND LOAD THE PTO AND ENGINE UNTIL SPEEDS DROP TO RATED SPEEDS. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS HORSEPOWER WITHOUT TORQUE AND "SPEED" BUT TORQUE CAN EXIST WITHOUT SHAFT ROTATION AND "SPEED" RESULTING IN "0 HORSEPOWER" BECAUSE TORQUE IS FORCE AND ACTUAL "POWER" AND "HORSEPOWER" IS JUST A "RATE".