Wow what an excellent quick summary. You are articulate and sussinct in your teaching. I love your straight forward style. From what I have seen it is the best video on RUclips for this topic! Thank you. Continue making other science related videos!
This is EXCELLENT! You have a gift for explaining complex concepts, and made me laugh when the image of the angry lion popped up as you said, "There is a lot of the spectrum that we are not equipped to detect, because we were evolved only to not be eaten by lions which are definitely visible in the visible spectrum." I'm watching other videos of your as well, keep up the good work!
5:31 - - you can send an AC current encoded with your song to the antenna (at your/a frequency); the antenna will convert the AC current into an electromagnetic wave - - which can then be received by your friend. 5:49 - - Chart 1 - - US Frequency Allocations of the Radio Spectrum 5:58 - - Chart 2 - - Radio Spectrum
You are the smartest man I ever heard. And you have an exquisite and beautiful talent to explain the complex where it is understandable (at least somewhat to a guy like me). Thank you profoundly!!!❤️❤️❤️
No radio waves are exactly like visible light but have even less energy than visible light so they are not harmful , unless you are near a very high power radio source which can definitely cause burns , the most harmful are x rays and gamma rays , whenever you take X-ray of your body it causes mutation of your DNA.
Soundwaves are not just carried by air and water as many people would think by your generality. There are also transferred by steel at many times the speed of air .
At 0.46 , you said " when you pass a current ". Here, you did not say DC or AC current . Then again 0.57 you said, " when you pass a AC current ". So, that means you were talking about DC current at 0.46 ?
I’m bought a crypto called theta. And I realize that really no one understands what they’re talking about!! I’m trying to write a paper to get into a PhD program for Health and Human Performance and I chose to write about theta because I like it, might make me wealthy, and I love learning!!! I keep going back, and back, and back...I’m fairly certain I will be reading the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita, or listening to Beethoven next. Thanks again.
I just read Bhagavad Gita and loved it! The Tao is similar. You'd like the Kyballion I bet!! The Bible still amazes me, as it transforms its meaning over time to be exactly what I need at any particular time in my life. Truly "The Living Word."
hey great video , really well explained. It would have just helped to say "alternating current " instead of " AC" lost 10 minutes figuring out what that was lol
At 0:46 , you said " when you pass a current through a wire". Here, you did not say DC or AC current . Then again 0:57 you said, " when you pass an AC current through a wire". So, that means you were talking about DC current at 0:46 ?
wait but the othes said like the magnetic field is the electric field field but with some moving of charges so how the both magnetic and electric exist in the same time ??
No mention of photons? If I understand Feynman correctly, all EMR is photons and not waves. Feynman says the wave-particle duality is just due to confusion and EMR is only particles. Einstein’s Nobel prize was for proving that photons do not add amplitudes as waves would and thus the Photoelectric Effect proves light is not a wave. Yet we have AM radio (Amplitude Modulation) which Feynman would explain by saying there are MORE photons, not stronger photons nor bigger waves. So it seems to me radio signals are produced by “emergent” waves composed of a shower of photons and that the “color” of the photons that make up the shower is immaterial. Do I misunderstand Feynman and Einstein or are they just wrong?
Nice one the imige of magneticle feilds flow . I wonder if it is olso consition the behaviure of the particle feild fllow and there behaviure of core colapses of particles to produse thise waves😍 Like in cosmos we see polar switsh inside the black hole.(innercore) But do to the phisicle stuck in position we have vemale pull a litle harder we have counterfeildflow we have male and pull a lotle more harder we have maly femal(look to the angle of the beaks. They are the resemblend of the stuck switsh and the thentional pull and releas for the manivesting exsteems of thention diverentional in a stuck position😍🛸💜 But you see the feilds going outwarts equatorial same as the planet eurth. And not a plus and min in the poars boths are going inwards😍 on the demand of eurths magnetude of feilds in motion (🌀>🌐>>) Lool the the { { than you olso understand whay the woble exists has noting to do with planets oldo they go hand in hand with the event they are part of the evend🌈 If you don't understand masser the combas neadle . A compas neadle with the magneticle going in on one side and going out on the other side is a broken compas neadle and will olwaays dance do to the South arow is bending away from south. And north arow is pulling in to north. 4 jears i have shown manny thinks to show and jad it still is not added bi the pressend commen science👀 whay??¿ Every one can do it at how to see if polars realy are plus and min. I understood it from selfsustaineble plasma of creation its space and motion and magnetude ophone itself. To manivest the presentation of the furts particle of existance. I made neadles with to of the same directions of magnetice motion towart the midle of the neadle Manny times to show til mi blond hears became like hu wat em i doin i can olso masher the compas neadle wit mlamps as it masssures direction of feildflow. So i put one in the midle and the other on its thurn on bothes ends😍 And 🤣😋🤣 jeb boths are counting in plus and when i swiths the penns in the midle and do the same boths are countin in the min😍 Actualy wat i see here is whay old lightbold are able to give light. Not thermodinamics.of elextrons pushing trou. But exileteretet particles to reseave and schink to release and grow. And with it there colective cosmos expands and scrinks😍 For our aminos of the eye there free plasma to interact ophone it for us to see light🌈 Bit this becomes understandeble if we walk away from plus and min🙏 Thention diverentional😍🙏🌈
Thention diverentional is equal to the intention of the thention diverentional. Bevore space time of this structure and bevore there colective coherence towart ther princeple (the soul of the cluster totalety)😍
But WHAT are the waves made of? What IS the wave? And plz don't just answer "it's a magnetic field" and what is the magnetic field then? If it's some particle involved please name that particle but if no particle is involved then please explain if these waves are made of nothing or something?
These waves are nothing but just light waves, yes particles are involved but these are mass less particles called photons , these photons have energy , now depends on your research how deep you want to go .
@@anandsystemsengineering9142 I'm trying to approach this from a logical point of view and I suddenly realised that to be able to make any kind of claim that suggests that I have some sort of basic understanding of what a photon is I literally have to accept something so proposterous (that photons are both mass/energy/particles and at the same time they're massless, zero energy nonexistent waves) that it just doesn't make any god damn sense. If this was biology instead of quantum physics I'd be asked to accept that there is a creature in the animal kingdom that is a mammal, it has 4 feet and weighs 100kg and it doesn't exist and no one has ever seen it. We have mapped their habitat we know where evey single one of them lives, we have tagged every one of them with a ear tag, and of course this animal has never existed and no one has ever heard of it. I mean how would you even start to grapple with this idea? So I have another question. Could it be that physicists have simply just missed to understand something fundamental and instead of realizing this blunder they are instead 100% sure that they have the right understanding and since it can't be their astronomical blunder it has to be the fact that these "photons" are ghosts, and they're real, they exist, they don't exist, sometimes they both exist and don't exist at the exact same time, it's whatever really. Could this possibly be the case? That there's a major blunder? Hope I make sense English isn't my first language. Peace
@@anandsystemsengineering9142 And thank you for your reply, Idk if I made sense in the last post so let me clarify. Just so you know what my lever understanding is I'm 40yo average intelligence and have always been low key interested in these things. I read about the double slut experiment probably 20 years ago, I have also read about the fallacies involved when non physicists attempt to convey the "mystery" from a very limited understanding. I get that it's complex, and I get that physicists are certain they have the right understanding since they can predict how photons will behave. Let's assume that ghosts are real, I mean the spirits of dead people. Imagine if they were so frequently manifested that they could be studied to the point of living humans being able to predict where a ghost will appear and when. But just because a scientist can use mathematics to accurately predict where a ghost will appear is NOT synonymous in ANY WAY with "understanding what ghosts are" would you agree? Perhaps physicists have ZERO clue about what electromagnetic radiation is and the only thing they actually know is how to mathematically predict and categorize different types of radiation. I hope I don't sound very stupid now hehe. A caveman that lived 40.000 years age could very well have been fully aware of the connection between dark clouds and rainfall, to the point of him being able to predict if its gonna rain or not with 100% accuracy, but does that mean that he understands the liquid and gas state of water and how humidity and temperature and pressure plays a roll? Hardly. So being able to predict something with great accuracy means nothing really (in this sense, not in every sense of evey thing of course) would you agree? How deep is the physicists understanding of what subatomic "particles" are or aren't?
@@anandsystemsengineering9142Doesn't sound like they're "massless" if you read their wiki page, you'll find terms such as "angular momentum of the photon" "high energy photons" you'll even find equations for calculating mass. And of course you'll also find lots of sentences that say "since the photon is massless...." Now this is what I'm talking about, it's a 4 legged ghost that is a mammal and a fish and doesn't even exist, hasn't ever even been conceptualized actually 🐠 Okay, if I use my average intelligence I'd say that everything that moves at the speed of light can not: 1 Be a particle 2 Have mass 3 Have angular momentum 4 Consist of high energy But then again I guess you have to have really high intelligence to understand these things, it's not like you can rely on math and logic. 99.99999% of all physics seems to be calculating 'probabilities' and then inventing a thousand new theoretical "concepts" in an attempt to explain weird phenomena. I'm not saying I don't believe in science obviously I do, but it's not like I automatically assume that there's 0% chance that smart educated people can be wrong even about fundamental stuff in their profession. History teaches us that in 50 or 100 years we'll probably cringe or laugh about most of the theories we're 100% sure of today. No? 😂
Dear Mobile Technicallaser , We cannot see radio waves with Human eyes , we can detect radio waves with spectrum analyzer or you can use antenna , For Detection of X-Rays you can use Geiger Counter & For Infrared Light you can use Infrared camera .
![What is Infrared Radiation & Electromagnetic Spectrum? - [4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PHDiXiEc9ro/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow what an excellent quick summary. You are articulate and sussinct in your teaching. I love your straight forward style. From what I have seen it is the best video on RUclips for this topic! Thank you. Continue making other science related videos!
You sir , made our day , this makes us work even harder. Thanks a lot!
Very well done! Thank you for a good job explaining /showing the mechanics of Electromagnetic waves.
Searched for a lot of videos on Radio waves. This was the only one so easily explained and information ! 👍🏻
Awesome, thank you!Glad you liked it.
True👏👏👏
This is EXCELLENT! You have a gift for explaining complex concepts, and made me laugh when the image of the angry lion popped up as you said, "There is a lot of the spectrum that we are not equipped to detect, because we were evolved only to not be eaten by lions which are definitely visible in the visible spectrum."
I'm watching other videos of your as well, keep up the good work!
Well done. Best synopsis of electro magnetic waves I have heard ..👍
Thanks a lot Matthew , you made our day !
@@anandsystemsengineering9142 come back
Despite the Indian accent, the contents are very clear & quite easy to follow.. Thank you...
You can definitely tell he was kind enough to slow down and articulate. It helped me a lot as well!
I learned a lot. I like the way he used sources.💯
Clear cut and easily understandable!
Easily explained video on Radio technology....Great work👍
Siddharth Chandanshive thanks a lot Siddharth . 👍👍
5:31 - - you can send an AC current encoded with your song to the antenna (at your/a frequency); the antenna will convert the AC current into an electromagnetic wave - - which can then be received by your friend.
5:49 - - Chart 1 - - US Frequency Allocations of the Radio Spectrum
5:58 - - Chart 2 - - Radio Spectrum
Wow! Thanks for this helpful, clear explanation.
great and simple explanation. thanks
Very well done and easy to understand - thank you! :D
Thank you. Very much appreciate your efforts
Thank you for watching and taking time out for writing the kind words. Much appreciated .
Thank you very much. Well explained and understandable.
thanks
You are the smartest man I ever heard. And you have an exquisite and beautiful talent to explain the complex where it is understandable (at least somewhat to a guy like me).
Thank you profoundly!!!❤️❤️❤️
Appreciate that
What are your 5 favorite books please?
Very great knowledge shared regarding radio waves..!!!!
Vinay Balani thanks a lot for your comment . Much appreciated .
thanks for making this video it was very helpful👍
"We have only evolved to not be eaten by lions, which are definitely visible in the visible spectrum."
Now that's the kind of teaching I like
You did an amazing video!!!!!
Excellent video!!! Thank you!
Thanks
Well done 👏 Thank you for the information. Hope to see more videos.
Thanks a lot a Alice !!
Thanks.. Very Informative
Thanks a lot for watching !
thank for making this clear
❤ very very yusful and nice video thanks 🙏 the great Riyal great,,,, knowledge and experience
Nicely explained, thanks
Please tell me.are the radio waves hamful for the body
No radio waves are exactly like visible light but have even less energy than visible light so they are not harmful , unless you are near a very high power radio source which can definitely cause burns , the most harmful are x rays and gamma rays , whenever you take X-ray of your body it causes mutation of your DNA.
Soundwaves are not just carried by air and water as many people would think by your generality. There are also transferred by steel at many times the speed of air .
Good formulas to use on how to catch a thief. Thank you
Thanks
So Informative
Thank you the excellent video.
Welcome illustrious1 !!!!!
Absolutely loved this video, jokes had me cracking up
Great, thank you. The background noise (music) seems pointless and I find it distracting. Otherwise excellent info well presented.
Sorry about it. Its hard to make videos .we will improve
Sir sun emitted electromagnetic wave, why these electromagnetic wave not produced emf in a close loop coil in a space
Very nice sir
Where do these radio waves come from?
well defined sir
Thanks a lot Bidit , means a lot !
Well done
thanks
Thank you 😊
very useful, thank you
At 0.46 , you said " when you pass a current ". Here, you did not say DC or AC current . Then again 0.57 you said, " when you pass a AC current ". So, that means you were talking about DC current at 0.46 ?
Very helpful
I’m bought a crypto called theta. And I realize that really no one understands what they’re talking about!! I’m trying to write a paper to get into a PhD program for Health and Human Performance and I chose to write about theta because I like it, might make me wealthy, and I love learning!!! I keep going back, and back, and back...I’m fairly certain I will be reading the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita, or listening to Beethoven next.
Thanks again.
I just read Bhagavad Gita and loved it! The Tao is similar. You'd like the Kyballion I bet!! The Bible still amazes me, as it transforms its meaning over time to be exactly what I need at any particular time in my life. Truly "The Living Word."
@@chasityawesome are you tripping bro..... you sound high as fuc-
👍👍👍👍 thank you
Thanks!
hey great video , really well explained. It would have just helped to say "alternating current " instead of " AC" lost 10 minutes figuring out what that was lol
Sorry for making you work for 10 minutes
Information is super awesome but plz put the pdf
At 0:46 , you said " when you pass a current through a wire". Here, you did not say DC or AC current . Then again 0:57 you said, " when you pass an AC current through a wire". So, that means you were talking about DC current at 0:46 ?
wait but the othes said like the magnetic field is the electric field field but with some moving of charges so how the both magnetic and electric exist in the same time ??
Two sides of the same coin
Thanks👍
No mention of photons? If I understand Feynman correctly, all EMR is photons and not waves. Feynman says the wave-particle duality is just due to confusion and EMR is only particles. Einstein’s Nobel prize was for proving that photons do not add amplitudes as waves would and thus the Photoelectric Effect proves light is not a wave. Yet we have AM radio (Amplitude Modulation) which Feynman would explain by saying there are MORE photons, not stronger photons nor bigger waves. So it seems to me radio signals are produced by “emergent” waves composed of a shower of photons and that the “color” of the photons that make up the shower is immaterial.
Do I misunderstand Feynman and Einstein or are they just wrong?
But why the music of Institute of Human Anatomy??
Nice one the imige of magneticle feilds flow .
I wonder if it is olso consition the behaviure of the particle feild fllow and there behaviure of core colapses of particles to produse thise waves😍
Like in cosmos we see polar switsh inside the black hole.(innercore)
But do to the phisicle stuck in position we have vemale pull a litle harder we have counterfeildflow we have male and pull a lotle more harder we have maly femal(look to the angle of the beaks.
They are the resemblend of the stuck switsh and the thentional pull and releas for the manivesting exsteems of thention diverentional in a stuck position😍🛸💜
But you see the feilds going outwarts equatorial same as the planet eurth.
And not a plus and min in the poars boths are going inwards😍 on the demand of eurths magnetude of feilds in motion
(🌀>🌐>>)
Lool the the { { than you olso understand whay the woble exists has noting to do with planets oldo they go hand in hand with the event they are part of the evend🌈
If you don't understand masser the combas neadle .
A compas neadle with the magneticle going in on one side and going out on the other side is a broken compas neadle and will olwaays dance do to the South arow is bending away from south.
And north arow is pulling in to north.
4 jears i have shown manny thinks to show and jad it still is not added bi the pressend commen science👀 whay??¿
Every one can do it at how to see if polars realy are plus and min.
I understood it from selfsustaineble plasma of creation its space and motion and magnetude ophone itself.
To manivest the presentation of the furts particle of existance.
I made neadles with to of the same directions of magnetice motion towart the midle of the neadle
Manny times to show til mi blond hears became like hu wat em i doin i can olso masher the compas neadle wit mlamps as it masssures direction of feildflow.
So i put one in the midle and the other on its thurn on bothes ends😍
And 🤣😋🤣 jeb boths are counting in plus and when i swiths the penns in the midle and do the same boths are countin in the min😍
Actualy wat i see here is whay old lightbold are able to give light.
Not thermodinamics.of elextrons pushing trou.
But exileteretet particles to reseave and schink to release and grow.
And with it there colective cosmos expands and scrinks😍
For our aminos of the eye there free plasma to interact ophone it for us to see light🌈
Bit this becomes understandeble if we walk away from plus and min🙏
Thention diverentional😍🙏🌈
Thention diverentional is equal to the intention of the thention diverentional.
Bevore space time of this structure and bevore there colective coherence towart ther princeple (the soul of the cluster totalety)😍
I'm going to watch further .
Oei oei oei i love the imigery💟🙏❤
Jeb i liked it ferry match .💜
thank you for your surves of contribution 🙏
Wish you and oll match love and joy💟🙏❤🌈🍀
Thank you
Welcome bro 😎
Nice
Grate
Thanks
We have only evolved to not be eaten by a lion which is in the visible spectrum. Haha that got me
But WHAT are the waves made of? What IS the wave? And plz don't just answer "it's a magnetic field" and what is the magnetic field then? If it's some particle involved please name that particle but if no particle is involved then please explain if these waves are made of nothing or something?
These waves are nothing but just light waves, yes particles are involved but these are mass less particles called photons , these photons have energy , now depends on your research how deep you want to go .
@@anandsystemsengineering9142 I'm trying to approach this from a logical point of view and I suddenly realised that to be able to make any kind of claim that suggests that I have some sort of basic understanding of what a photon is I literally have to accept something so proposterous (that photons are both mass/energy/particles and at the same time they're massless, zero energy nonexistent waves) that it just doesn't make any god damn sense.
If this was biology instead of quantum physics I'd be asked to accept that there is a creature in the animal kingdom that is a mammal, it has 4 feet and weighs 100kg and it doesn't exist and no one has ever seen it. We have mapped their habitat we know where evey single one of them lives, we have tagged every one of them with a ear tag, and of course this animal has never existed and no one has ever heard of it.
I mean how would you even start to grapple with this idea? So I have another question.
Could it be that physicists have simply just missed to understand something fundamental and instead of realizing this blunder they are instead 100% sure that they have the right understanding and since it can't be their astronomical blunder it has to be the fact that these "photons" are ghosts, and they're real, they exist, they don't exist, sometimes they both exist and don't exist at the exact same time, it's whatever really. Could this possibly be the case? That there's a major blunder? Hope I make sense English isn't my first language. Peace
@@anandsystemsengineering9142 And thank you for your reply, Idk if I made sense in the last post so let me clarify. Just so you know what my lever understanding is I'm 40yo average intelligence and have always been low key interested in these things. I read about the double slut experiment probably 20 years ago, I have also read about the fallacies involved when non physicists attempt to convey the "mystery" from a very limited understanding. I get that it's complex, and I get that physicists are certain they have the right understanding since they can predict how photons will behave.
Let's assume that ghosts are real, I mean the spirits of dead people. Imagine if they were so frequently manifested that they could be studied to the point of living humans being able to predict where a ghost will appear and when. But just because a scientist can use mathematics to accurately predict where a ghost will appear is NOT synonymous in ANY WAY with "understanding what ghosts are" would you agree?
Perhaps physicists have ZERO clue about what electromagnetic radiation is and the only thing they actually know is how to mathematically predict and categorize different types of radiation. I hope I don't sound very stupid now hehe.
A caveman that lived 40.000 years age could very well have been fully aware of the connection between dark clouds and rainfall, to the point of him being able to predict if its gonna rain or not with 100% accuracy, but does that mean that he understands the liquid and gas state of water and how humidity and temperature and pressure plays a roll? Hardly. So being able to predict something with great accuracy means nothing really (in this sense, not in every sense of evey thing of course) would you agree? How deep is the physicists understanding of what subatomic "particles" are or aren't?
No it cannot be a blunder , these photos which are massless are used by plants for photosynthesis
@@anandsystemsengineering9142Doesn't sound like they're "massless" if you read their wiki page, you'll find terms such as "angular momentum of the photon" "high energy photons" you'll even find equations for calculating mass. And of course you'll also find lots of sentences that say "since the photon is massless...."
Now this is what I'm talking about, it's a 4 legged ghost that is a mammal and a fish and doesn't even exist, hasn't ever even been conceptualized actually 🐠
Okay, if I use my average intelligence I'd say that everything that moves at the speed of light can not:
1 Be a particle
2 Have mass
3 Have angular momentum
4 Consist of high energy
But then again I guess you have to have really high intelligence to understand these things, it's not like you can rely on math and logic. 99.99999% of all physics seems to be calculating 'probabilities' and then inventing a thousand new theoretical "concepts" in an attempt to explain weird phenomena. I'm not saying I don't believe in science obviously I do, but it's not like I automatically assume that there's 0% chance that smart educated people can be wrong even about fundamental stuff in their profession. History teaches us that in 50 or 100 years we'll probably cringe or laugh about most of the theories we're 100% sure of today. No? 😂
Wave ko kese dekhege
Dear Mobile Technicallaser , We cannot see radio waves with Human eyes , we can detect radio waves with spectrum analyzer or you can use antenna , For Detection of X-Rays you can use Geiger Counter & For Infrared Light you can use Infrared camera .
Thanks but it was better if video would in urdu.
But I don’t know urdu
🙋♂
Kori wave plots
Sir
Kabhi hindi language me bhi bataye
Okay sure we will make once more in future in Hindi .
waves are waves... 🧐🤭🤣
and light is basically sound that your eyes can hear...
🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤
Thanks
Thank you