@@MysteriesUnearthed well first of all you blatantly obfuscated the entire experiment. Starting with, particles change their behavior when observed with human eyes. We can't see particles with the human eye, we can see a massive collection of them in the form of matter, but we can't see individual particles with the human eye. Observation in the double slit experiment means measuring. We use very very powerful measuring machines to observe particle behavior. These tools emit photons and their own EM fields etc. When the measuring device is activated ITS own EM field interferes with the particles that are being used in the experiment, causing an interference pattern. That's all. Just the act of measuring. It has nothing to do with conscious beings viewing their behavior. It's literally the effect of the machines we use to measure with.
Is it interesting? Sure, but more in the sense of deducing probabilities. Being that we have to bounce photons off of the particles being fired in order to even see them, accurately predicting where that collision or interference will happen is indeed a super interesting problem... even though we should absolutely be able to predict their locations in space without sacrificing other data. But we can't. We just don't have devices that sophisticated yet.
Yadda, yadda, yadda……and isn’t it interesting that our legs just happen to be long enough to reach the ground? This is all very interesting speculative fiction. But why would our descendants go through the trouble of creating such an intricate menagerie where all our ills persist? And when this suggested simulation we’re supposedly living in reaches the point in time when it’s created, does everything stop? There’s just too many possibilities to answer. Personally, I think the concept of ours being a simulated existence - one which conveniently pseudo-answers why the double-slit exercise produces the results we’ve seen - is for those hyperactive minds searching for an answer that is beyond their reach. And thus, they attribute it to a simulation. Much like those people who invent a God to give them answers to questions that our ape minds - barely out of the trees - are as to yet unable to answer.
Well...if you create such an indepth simulation to come to a specific answer you may be seeking, why would you omit things like the negatives and impact the outcome of said simulation to begin with? What if a great filter that resulted in a catastrophe has already been removed and we're checking the outcome? What if we are simply watching to confirm the root of a problem in the future? That's a pretty easy question to answer, any others?
But, but, but I swallow the red pill.
It is indeed a simulation and it is made as a prison for consciousness...
4:20 bro we know exactly why this happens... Enough with the quantum woo.
Why lol
@@danielmohrer7209 why what? Why that happens?
Since you know. Enlighten us. Please.
@@MysteriesUnearthed well first of all you blatantly obfuscated the entire experiment. Starting with, particles change their behavior when observed with human eyes. We can't see particles with the human eye, we can see a massive collection of them in the form of matter, but we can't see individual particles with the human eye. Observation in the double slit experiment means measuring. We use very very powerful measuring machines to observe particle behavior. These tools emit photons and their own EM fields etc. When the measuring device is activated ITS own EM field interferes with the particles that are being used in the experiment, causing an interference pattern. That's all. Just the act of measuring. It has nothing to do with conscious beings viewing their behavior. It's literally the effect of the machines we use to measure with.
Is it interesting? Sure, but more in the sense of deducing probabilities. Being that we have to bounce photons off of the particles being fired in order to even see them, accurately predicting where that collision or interference will happen is indeed a super interesting problem... even though we should absolutely be able to predict their locations in space without sacrificing other data. But we can't. We just don't have devices that sophisticated yet.
You taught me nothing just another day dreamer . When you get proof or anything good I’ll be waiting.
Yadda, yadda, yadda……and isn’t it interesting that our legs just happen to be long enough to reach the ground?
This is all very interesting speculative fiction. But why would our descendants go through the trouble of creating such an intricate menagerie where all our ills persist? And when this suggested simulation we’re supposedly living in reaches the point in time when it’s created, does everything stop?
There’s just too many possibilities to answer. Personally, I think the concept of ours being a simulated existence - one which conveniently pseudo-answers why the double-slit exercise produces the results we’ve seen - is for those hyperactive minds searching for an answer that is beyond their reach. And thus, they attribute it to a simulation.
Much like those people who invent a God to give them answers to questions that our ape minds - barely out of the trees - are as to yet unable to answer.
we are all in a strip mall we sat down in a chair some dude was giving us a free test trial.
There is a yellow turtle behind you
Well...if you create such an indepth simulation to come to a specific answer you may be seeking, why would you omit things like the negatives and impact the outcome of said simulation to begin with? What if a great filter that resulted in a catastrophe has already been removed and we're checking the outcome? What if we are simply watching to confirm the root of a problem in the future?
That's a pretty easy question to answer, any others?
@@BanditUshanka and the yellow turtle?
@@UltraGeezer 4th dimension entity running the simulation