My only complaint. And seriously the only huge problem in my eyes. The global ranger has rear ac vents. I figured they’d carry it over and never doubted they wouldn’t. And they didn’t. Why? Fleets, kids, adults, dogs all can benefit from rear ac vents, and they just give us a little cubby hole. That was the last thing I thought they’d remove from the global ranger for us.
agree...my kids complain that they don't have that in my current 2022...I thought with all the people saying this would have caused someone in FORD to recognize it...nope...I hate to say this, I might really...get the colorado tb just because of this feature. :(
You look very comfortable in that beautiful new Ranger! Even as a shorter guy. *Ford is absolutely gonna own the midsized class w/this Gen3 Ranger. Kudos to Ford Motor* ! Best truck builder out there. All American!
A long bench in the back instead of 60/40 or 50/50 is a miss in my opinion. Appears like it need more storage. I think you're right about that rear shoulder belt and that they need a grab handle.
They always wait and watch. Look at it this way, when the Dakota comes out, all of these will seem ancient. And Ram will easily take "midsize truck of the year". But who will get it this year?
@@Dusdaddy Who owns them today?? Dakota was a bust, couldn't give me a Chrysler product .... or what's their name today??? I just remember, Rust never sleeps!!👎
The newest crop of midsize trucks have matched or exceeded the towing/hauling capability of the early 2000's half tons. And cost has almost doubled. My first new truck was a 2001 F150 Crew cab 4x4 5.4, tow rating was 7700 and payload was 1500. Out the door for $30k.
Think about it, the Ranger has a payload of 1500lbs. Technically, it's a 3/4 ton! And it can tow more than my 2011 Hemi Ram. And it also costs the same...
Supply and demand I think is another factor - most people buy trucks for basic transportation which explains why many manufacturers are getting out of the car business - found a google research that indicated “75% of truck owners use their truck to tow about once a year and just 35% of owners actually haul something more than once a year”…. Combine this with 25% margins on trucks vs 10% on passenger cars it’s a perfect recipe for these continuous upward trending of prices above and beyond inflation
The midsized market is really heating up. Both GM and Ford have really stepped up their game. I can't wait to see what Toyota brings to the party with the redesign of the Tacoma.
I think Toyota will still be king on cause of how many different configurations they still offer. For example GM is using only double cab short bed and no manual. Also this ranger looks like a bigger maverick lol
Glad you finally got back from under your stone. The whole world is already downsizing and thinking of fuel consumption and fuel costs. Like always: USA is late to the party.
Why is GM not delivering the Colorado, the plant parking lot is full? What's wrong with the new model? I'm not buying that they can't get enough car haulers.... what is GM hiding?
I am not a truck person or even need one, but like to listen to these kind of videos about them and what the provide. Thanks for the video and take care.
If you were to test drive one truck try the ram 1500. I'm not a truck guy but i drive trucks for work and the only truck i felt was worthy to be a daily driver is the ram 1500. Go for the 6 cylinder engine. It's easy to find used v8 rams because "gas is too expensive."
Great review! It looks much better than the previous generation, although I’m personally not a fan of vertically oriented infotainment screens. One thing that bothered me was that there are large gaps in the manually sliding window when closed.
@@PlayWaves1 yep, I know and that's the problem. You can't get a nice wide camera or map view. Just the top 6" so it is a much smaller usable area than the nice horizontal in the F150 or GM. I know as I drive a Ram with a similar setup for two years. I didn't need a radio station taking up half the screen.
I would really like Ford having in their lineup a Ranger Single Cab with a 7ft bed Work Truck, with a 4cyl or v6, without any Electronic Gizmos. A Base and Affordable Work Truck, for WORK and other Serious stuff. Do not want an Off Road or and 1/4 mile beast, we want a REAL Pickup, for Work, like the previous Ford Rangers was doing so well in the past. NOT the Maverick. We want the Ranger, a small/mid-size Robust and reliable Pickup Truck with a Chassis.
I was ready to buy the 24 Tacoma extra cab but they dont have any rear access doors you have to slide the front seat forward as much as possible and reach in. Its super awkward and not good for your back.
I like GM's looks better, but the Ranger is acceptable. The lack of 4-wheel Auto is a big miss. The Denali feels more upscale than the Lariat. I bet the Ranger will win on gas mileage.
I bought a new Ranger in 2011. All options except automatic transmission and paid $22,000. The old Rangers were great little trucks that ran forever and were reasonably priced. These new ones are practically the size of an F150 with no bed and are way overpriced. Some people still want an am/fm radio, knobs and buttons instead of screens, and simplicity.
@@markcrandall2794 I have to disagree. There are a lot of people(Men) that don't want or need a TV Screen on the dashboard! Give me real gauges with an AM/FM radio and CD Player. I don't need "Bluetooth" because I don't have a damn cell phone because they don't work out here on the Ranch and I just need a truck that works and can go to town and back when I need it to.
@@bryanbennett972 Well, judging by what automakers are putting in the cars today, it’s pretty clear that more people want the technology. You can either adapt to the new offerings in cars, or you can go buy an old pos and drive that.
@@bryanbennett972I am a man, the reason I’m looking at forward is because I do want the technology and for is ahead in this aspect with their safety features. Apple car play is massive for GPS and I haven’t listened to the radio old school since 2013. I drive a 2010 ford focus nicest car I have ever owned but my life has outgrown it and I need a all purpose vehicle with more space as well as being able to drive in bad weather conditions. Bluetooth by the way was common place back then and the fact that you don’t have a cellphone I don’t really believe because you can’t even do banking now a days without one since most bakes require a phone on record to receive verification texts. Plus your also on RUclips on the internet right now
I have a mint 93 Ranger XLT SC with the 4.0 engine and it's 4x4 w only 140k miles. I Totally Love my Classic Ranger. One day I may get a new one. I'm liking the Raptor a lot. I just saw a 2020 Ranger Sport today in red, that's what got me started on possibly getting a new Ranger.
Nice truck. Couldn't wait for it to come out. I was seriously considering buying one. However, since Ford decided to price gouge its loyal customers by hiking the cost of the Ranger into what the F-150 used to cost only tells me their greed exceeds their concern. I'll pass.
I died laughing when Tim looked into the camera and said, "I'm not 300 lbs."..comment section can be a cruel place..poor guy lol Great video as always, Tim!
Power rear window, lockers, intelligent headlights, power radiator shutters, paddle shifters in the Raptor those you forgot to mention. And one correction the xlt heaflogjt are also LED but reflector type. Thanks my friend.
Good walk-around, but you didn’t mention that you can now lay 4x8 paneling flat on the bed floor like a full-size pickup. That’s a HUGE advantage the Ranger has over the midsize competitors. That is mentioned in the Ford press release.
@@dand2334 That's a waste. If I knew I had to carry plywood that often, I would be buying a full-size. For the three times a year I do buy it, I'd use the raised bed on the GMC . Probably just shut the tailgate and stick it over which is even easier. Not going to buy a truck just because plywood can lay flat.
@@Dusdaddy it’s more than just plywood that is 4’ wide. In Europe VW sells this platform and there is a need to load a standardized European pallet in the bed of the truck
When it’s 97 degree and humid as all get out at the farm. The last thing I want is to wait for my tailgate to lower because my hands are full. Pull that handle and let it slam. Can’t believe how soft people have gotten, notice the manufacturers cater to it….like a four door option and now that’s all you can get. That’s why the price starts out so dang high
It is annoying sometimes, but I just push my dampened tailgate down when I don't wanna wait the extra 1.5 seconds. I do totally get what you mean about people getting soft.. and it's backward when big companies cater to the weak mob mentality. But I think that temporary trend is gonna be looked back upon with shame and ridicule after us real folk take back the narrative and make common sense great again. It's already started and now we can't be stopped as companies like Bud Light, Fox "News" and so on learn the hard way🤡 This next era is gonna be glorious👍🏻
Tim love the reviews! I am excited about the increase in back seat comfort! Wish it was a 60 40 for ease if dog entry in rear or cargo on one side and a pac on the other. Huge positive change for me is 48 inches between the wheel wells sir! Now I can haul stuff on pallet! But please tell Ford we need a 6 foot bed behind this crew cab for more cargo! Tail gate down doesn't put the load center of mass in front of rear axle on a 5 foot bed but with a six foot bed a pallet load would be very safe and stable and within the payload of a ranger for around town delivery in tight places shining over a much larger foot print half ton.
I was in the new Dodge, a couple years ago with the round electric knob shifter... On the test drive it malfunctioned... Drive was like being in neutral, and it wouldn't go nowhere.... After several tries and even opening and closing the door..... Had to turn the engine off, and restart....
I think that Step Up by the rear bumper is just that... 1 foot step in, hold on to the top of the bed, and lift the other leg over into the bed... You made it sound so hard to do or something.... :)
Wow, nice work, Ford. I like this new Ranger better than the new Colorado, if only for the better transmission. I still wish a manual was available (way to go, Toyota!). Seems to me that GM really did themselves a disservice by axing the baby Duramax. Without the diesel, there's not much to separate the Colorado from its peers.
Tim great review!!! Love the truck. But the deal breaker for me is no 6 foot bed. Wonder why Toyota and Nissan give the consumer that choice but Ford and GM dictate to you.
I want to see a regular cab long bed 4x4 with roll up windows, no carpet, a/c, ps, pb, cruse control, tow package, steel wheels priced under $30k....All they want to sell are overpriced trucks loaded with garbage that will cause issues when there is a HUGE market for basic low priced vehicles.
@@robertchapman4488 Intrerior looks better. The screen is integrated into the dash neater. I do like the fold down back seat though. And typical Ford, you gotta option so many things into it.
Looks better than the outgoing model but still ugly IMO. The Canyon and Colorado beat it in every category, exterior styling, interior quality and layout. Toyota better bring it with the new Tacoma or GM is going to own this market.
There's a 3 memory setting on drivers door for your seat, side mirrors and steering wheel. Key fob for the xlt is too big, prefer the fob on my 2004 lariat pick up. I can't wait to get my '24 ranger.thenpricebblurb at 20:45is deceptive. Expect to pay about 50k. you deffo need an extended warranty with all the electronics.
Guess my new fav mid sizer will be between the Colorado and what ever I think about the Tacoma when it comes out. This is just ok,,,,looks like the out going model except for the diff front end….same way they did the f-150
Colorado for looks and specs on paper did incredible. I disagree on them with canceling the other engine types they normally carried. Chevy is very close to Making some leading vehicles. Off subject. Stick that 2.7l into their trailblazers and trailblazers will double in sales
@@nogamblinge2671 no doubt on the engine choices….I wish they had kept a few others….I’m not much on 4 cyl turbos, I know it’s a strong engine. Just not my thing I guess.
10:35 There's a handle above your head, but yeah, I'd rather it be in the "B" pillar. Agreed on the foot step into bed. It should be standard on a truck. It's not some tech marvel and would probably reduce manufacturing costs by only offering it one way like you said. I'm not sure how I feel about vertical screen. I initially liked them when RAM did it, but with time I'm not liking it as much. At least they're starting to semi-integrate them into dashboards now as opposed to sticking a tablet.
Well, Tim, as far as the truck you're gonna buy for the channel? I think that if you were to purchase any of the newly released midsize trucks you wouldn't go wrong. I was thinking maybe the r Ranger since you seem to think the seats are so comfortable. You should probably stay away from the Raptor even though it's pretty cool. I think most of us are more likely to purchase one of the other trims. We already know about the 2.3 so definitely equipped with the 2.7.
I TOO have a COMPLAINT about the 2024 FORD RANGER. I THINK THE 2024 FORD RANGER is a GOOD LOOKING TRUCK but, to GET THE CONVENIENCE OF ALL WHEEL DRIVE, YOU have to STEP UP TO THE RAPTOR. I currently have a 2022 FORD RANGER LARIAT...I THINK I'LL KEEP IT. Another option (if i want a TRUCK) maybe look at a 2023 CHEVY COLORADO. TO GET a RAPTOR WITH 4WHEEL DRIVE is around $60,000. CHEVY COLORADO can BE HAD WITH FULL TIME ALL WHEEL DRIVE (IN LT ) FOR LESS.
@@jerryavlon4780 if that's the case, the longer wheelbase Ranger would make a nice replacement. I think mid sized crew cabs with 6' beds are very practical. Being 6" or so narrower than full sized makes them easier to live with.
Why cant we have colum shifters so it opens up all the center console room? Shifters in the middle, nob or shifter, just annoy the crap out of me. And why cant we get a longer bed?
Nice truck cod Tim. The Raptor is a bargain in the Raptor family. Not the most capable version, but still very impressive. I used to comment more when you had the PowerBoost F150. I switched from my PowerBoost to a Tremor with the Torsen front differential and ProPower Onboard. The power was more than enough. I have since gotten rid of all my new vehicles while I still could get most of my $$ back. I’m kinda protesting new vehicles pricing. The large increases are problematic, especially now that Ram is discounting their pickups quite heavily. Some poor bugger bought a Ram last year for over asking & now sees up to 20% off of retail. (Here in Alberta Canada) I respect buyer beware, but sooo many owners are owing so much more than what a brand new truck of identical content sells for this year!! Ugghhhh. My current newest 4x4 that can go off-road is a 79 GMC, loaded up for the year and running a serious powertrain, fuel injected 503 (because I can 😂😂) with the 6 speed automatic, lifted on 33s and lockers front & rear. It does not ride nearly as nice as the worst riding new products mind you,,,, 😂😂. My newest truck is a 2003 F150 Lightning (one of 3 I own). I daily drive my 2001 Lightning and have another Lightning from 1995. All are mint, but the 2003 & 1995 have less than 40,000 km on them each. They get lightly driven, the 20p1 is a truck! I tow with it, everything. I have a 2002 Harley Davidson F150 on factory 22” wheels and with 4wd, but it’s a mall crawler. Easy to get into because it’s low. Tows well though. It’s my SUV so to speak. I have 24bother classic trucks I drive off & on, including a 66 C10 283 automatic that is restored to rock stock,,, thought you might like that one, but the rest are mostly 67-72 C10 & K10 models. I decided to get into vehicles that generally don’t depreciate and appreciate instead!! Make some money, yet get to drive as well!! If I get a new vehicle it will be one of 2 F350 DuperCab Dually XLT 4x4 s my buddy has coming into his dealership. The most base trucks that still have heated seats & 5th wheel prep. 7.3 gas and a 6.7 diesel. I will be hauling a slide in, box mounted, Arctic Fox truck camper with slide out. I’m sure the gas powertrain is more than enough for that,,,, but the HO diesel is soo nice as well. 😊 Keep ‘em coming!! Just thought it would touch base. I am busier than ever so I don’t often get to get this close to being caught up!! I like the new Tundras a lot!! They were a consideration before I decided everything is too expensive. A SR5 Double Cab TRD Off-Road model is a very good price for today’s market. Later, Eh!!
@@CJ-fh8up yep, and they don’t offer a push button start unless you buy a $45k Lariat… but you can go buy a 7 year old based model Nissan Altima and it will have push button start
Id have to play around with the build and price once it comes out, but from what Ive seen here, the GM twins take the win for me. Nicer interior, and more available features. Lack of 4auto here is a bummer considering it's available in Europe/Australia
Gotta agree. The GM just looks and seems to function better. The way the integrated that screen is nice. I do like how the back seat folds flat though.
@@PlayWaves1 Ok, more standard features. Granted, we don't know pricing yet but an XLT w/o keyless and an available bed step? Who knows? Maybe an optioned out XLT will be cheaper than the like GM? But we don't know because they didn't load pricing with the reveal.
@@PlayWaves1 IMO the Ranger missed out on a few key features: - Lack of horizontal screen means your eyes will be totally off the road when looking at it. - no rear air vents - no 4auto. - the rear side bedstep is pretty much useless with the tailgate down unlike the corner steps in the GM twins. - no available sunroof - a sea of cheap looking grey plastic all the cabin even on Lariat. Some pros over the GM twins: - available V6 - rear seats fold down not just up - can apparently fit a 4x8 flat between the wheel wells - base smaller digital gauge cluster looks better than the GM twins Overall, I think the GM twins win out over the new Ranger.
Good to see they made a usable rear seat. It didn't make any sense to offer these as a 4-door, compromise the bed length, and then not really be able to have rear passengers sit back there for anything other than a very short ride.
True but to go thru all that effort on a redesign and no rear air vents? Really Ford? They finally put in a trailer brake but no rear air vents? I dont get that as they put these vents on most of their line up
Thanks Tim. Good lookin truck. I like the butt impressions you do, can't think of any other reviewer that does that very important thing. I mean, if the seat is not comfy, it makes for a hated truck on long rides. Also, see u realized the "leaked" photo of taco was fake. Gotta be careful.
So what are the advantages of putting the step in the body instead of the bumper? Or did they just need to adopt GM’s feature without copying them exactly?
@@Pickuptrucktalk but it’s built into the structure and not the actual frame, like initially stated. I would think the bumper will be more durable and last longer with constant pressure applied vs. a part of the actual structural siding of the truck. Idk 🤷🏾♂️
What about it? Same towing as last year but they are offering the silly little "trailer knob" like the F-150. According to other reviewers, the rear window is powered. Not sure what level gets cooled seats.
I notice the Raptor is rated at 405 hp. The Australian Raptor is rated at 292 kW which converts to 397 hp. I wonder if the difference is down to a different tune or fuel type.
If I knew for sure that Ford has resolved their transmission issues, this is a truck I might want. However, my brother and son in law each had 2019 Rangers, and the transmission in each of them began slamming into gear, "hunting" for a gear on the highway, and generally not working correctly. (Each of those had a 10 speed transmission, BTW). Any idea if Ford has resolved this?
All the trim levels in Australia have the rear step to access the bed except for the Raptor which doesn’t because of the fancy multi mode exhaust system it has under there. I don’t understand why some non Raptor American trim levels don’t have it.
@@stevesafety6743 all midsize trucks are built to a specific length to fit into a garage. That's why they all have the same bed length and why they all have the same dimensions. Going 2" bigger would mean it doesn't fit into traditional garages. Automakers, like Ford, tell me fitting into a garage is at the top of the purchase reasons for a midsize truck. They don't dare mess with that length.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I’d like to put that to a test. 1 most people use their garage for storage not cars. And I would think the engineers could find some way if increasing leg room without increasing overall length. But hey I believe it’s 2 more inches than the Tacoma gives it’s rear passengers
I noticed that they finally went away from the piano black finish on the center console area, that’s a good change, but also noticed that the shifter in the XLT is different than that in the Lariot trim.
Ford. I need a real midsize truck. Not a 4 seat SUV with a little bed in the back. Bring back bed and cab options like you had a few years ago. Single cab, extended cab, crew cab. 5 foot, 6 foot and 7 foot bed options. Trucks are supposed to have optional configurations.
Tim, there was a grab handle above the rear seat on the headliner. And I prefer that the tailgate be capable of lowering it below level line, because there are things I need to load in the back that I want to get closer to floor before lifting, and so I don't need to lift them as high, the tailgate becomes a ramp. The damper feature is a negative to me, because I'm seeing that Ford now tethers the tailgate cables with that design feature, you can't quickly release the side cables.
It depends on the country, the Aussies get more choices to select from, including 3.0 litre diesel biturbo. The philippines very few accessories from Ford. Only Wildtrack and Raptor comes with rear a/c vents. I think the safety sensors should be across all models.
You always know when an Embargo lifts when you get10 videos about the same vehicle pop up on your feed at the same time! 🤣
And watch all of them even though it's the same info
@@ItMeDwaeji I only watched Tim and Andre this time
Exactly
IKR…
I watch them all!
My only complaint. And seriously the only huge problem in my eyes. The global ranger has rear ac vents. I figured they’d carry it over and never doubted they wouldn’t. And they didn’t. Why? Fleets, kids, adults, dogs all can benefit from rear ac vents, and they just give us a little cubby hole. That was the last thing I thought they’d remove from the global ranger for us.
agree...my kids complain that they don't have that in my current 2022...I thought with all the people saying this would have caused someone in FORD to recognize it...nope...I hate to say this, I might really...get the colorado tb just because of this feature. :(
They reserve certain features for higher trims and or more expensive models. They do this to get you to justify spending more money.
@@krusejonathan01 they don’t have them in higher trims.
@@ghilliemanreviews They have them in more expensive models. F150 ect. They’re trying to get you to justify purchasing a more expensive model.
@@krusejonathan01 not for the Ranger. Not in US versions. All trims don’t have the vents.
You look very comfortable in that beautiful new Ranger! Even as a shorter guy. *Ford is absolutely gonna own the midsized class w/this Gen3 Ranger. Kudos to Ford Motor* ! Best truck builder out there. All American!
No rear AC or vented seats on a Raptor for $60k is a deal breaker for me.
A long bench in the back instead of 60/40 or 50/50 is a miss in my opinion. Appears like it need more storage. I think you're right about that rear shoulder belt and that they need a grab handle.
The rear seat assist handles are over the door. Look just above his head in the video.🙄
Who'll be the first to review the Rainbow Raptor ?
The lack or rear vents in this day and age is silly. My 2004 4Runner had them.
My dads 1989 Ford Falcon GL (Australia) had them. In fact they had them around 1984 I believe.
In other countries this same exact truck has rear AC vents.
My 2004 4runner currently has them lol
I wish there was a moonroof. And the price wasn't ridiculous.
Booyah 👊🏽 😁 👍🏽 🇺🇸.
Thank you for your review
Thanks, Tim. I'm really liking the new styling. Ram is missing out not having an offering in this segment.
They always wait and watch. Look at it this way, when the Dakota comes out, all of these will seem ancient. And Ram will easily take "midsize truck of the year". But who will get it this year?
Gladiator
@@DusdaddyOMG 🤣🤣🤣
@@Dusdaddy Who owns them today?? Dakota was a bust, couldn't give me a Chrysler product .... or what's their name today??? I just remember, Rust never sleeps!!👎
The newest crop of midsize trucks have matched or exceeded the towing/hauling capability of the early 2000's half tons. And cost has almost doubled. My first new truck was a 2001 F150 Crew cab 4x4 5.4, tow rating was 7700 and payload was 1500. Out the door for $30k.
yeah and $1.00 from 2001 would have the purchasing power of $1.70 today, its called inflation.
Think about it, the Ranger has a payload of 1500lbs. Technically, it's a 3/4 ton! And it can tow more than my 2011 Hemi Ram. And it also costs the same...
These new midsize trucks are also the same size as a 2000 era full size truck
@@dand2334 Probably. Just narrower. Back then you could have a bench seat that fit three across easy, not these.
Supply and demand I think is another factor - most people buy trucks for basic transportation which explains why many manufacturers are getting out of the car business - found a google research that indicated “75% of truck owners use their truck to tow about once a year and just 35% of owners actually haul something more than once a year”…. Combine this with 25% margins on trucks vs 10% on passenger cars it’s a perfect recipe for these continuous upward trending of prices above and beyond inflation
The midsized market is really heating up. Both GM and Ford have really stepped up their game. I can't wait to see what Toyota brings to the party with the redesign of the Tacoma.
I think Toyota will still be king on cause of how many different configurations they still offer. For example GM is using only double cab short bed and no manual. Also this ranger looks like a bigger maverick lol
@@ChrisTejada-nl7mh yep and for good reason. 👍
I would trust a 2.7 Ford turbo Over the GM 4banger any day, Ford eco boost has been on the road for a number of years, and with Millions produced
Glad you finally got back from under your stone. The whole world is already downsizing and thinking of fuel consumption and fuel costs. Like always: USA is late to the party.
Why is GM not delivering the Colorado, the plant parking lot is full? What's wrong with the new model? I'm not buying that they can't get enough car haulers.... what is GM hiding?
I am not a truck person or even need one, but like to listen to these kind of videos about them and what the provide.
Thanks for the video and take care.
If you were to test drive one truck try the ram 1500. I'm not a truck guy but i drive trucks for work and the only truck i felt was worthy to be a daily driver is the ram 1500. Go for the 6 cylinder engine. It's easy to find used v8 rams because "gas is too expensive."
Bed size seems tiny. 6' bed please. While many use these as a weekend-buy-bags-of-mulch vehicle, others need more work capacity.
What is with the one piece rear seat back, and no LED headlights and key start on XLT. Sorry Ford, no sale.
Great review! It looks much better than the previous generation, although I’m personally not a fan of vertically oriented infotainment screens. One thing that bothered me was that there are large gaps in the manually sliding window when closed.
Yeah, I hate these new screens that just look like an afterthought. The GM looks best so far.
The advantage of the vertical screen is you can have 2 displays up. One for Google maps and one for Sirius for example.
@@PlayWaves1 yep, I know and that's the problem. You can't get a nice wide camera or map view. Just the top 6" so it is a much smaller usable area than the nice horizontal in the F150 or GM. I know as I drive a Ram with a similar setup for two years. I didn't need a radio station taking up half the screen.
I would really like Ford having in their lineup a Ranger Single Cab with a 7ft bed Work Truck, with a 4cyl or v6, without any Electronic Gizmos. A Base and Affordable Work Truck, for WORK and other Serious stuff. Do not want an Off Road or and 1/4 mile beast, we want a REAL Pickup, for Work, like the previous Ford Rangers was doing so well in the past. NOT the Maverick. We want the Ranger, a small/mid-size Robust and reliable Pickup Truck with a Chassis.
If Ford or Chevy offered a long bed option on the crew cab like the Toyota Tacoma, I’d seriously consider them.
Agreed, can’t understand the one useless box option.
If it wasn’t for that this is the truck I’d buy.
Maybe in a year? One was seen testing earlier.
I was ready to buy the 24 Tacoma extra cab but they dont have any rear access doors you have to slide the front seat forward as much as possible and reach in. Its super awkward and not good for your back.
I like GM's looks better, but the Ranger is acceptable. The lack of 4-wheel Auto is a big miss. The Denali feels more upscale than the Lariat. I bet the Ranger will win on gas mileage.
GM 4 banger turbo is too complicated and will not go 200k miles before failure
Still no ventilated seats?? In Florida I'd rather have ac in seat than heat
I bought a new Ranger in 2011. All options except automatic transmission and paid $22,000. The old Rangers were great little trucks that ran forever and were reasonably priced. These new ones are practically the size of an F150 with no bed and are way overpriced. Some people still want an am/fm radio, knobs and buttons instead of screens, and simplicity.
Too bad. Things have changed since 2011.Most people want their vehicles equipped with more than what you bought in 2011.
@@markcrandall2794 I have to disagree. There are a lot of people(Men) that don't want or need a TV Screen on the dashboard! Give me real gauges with an AM/FM radio and CD Player. I don't need "Bluetooth" because I don't have a damn cell phone because they don't work out here on the Ranch and I just need a truck that works and can go to town and back when I need it to.
@@bryanbennett972 Well, judging by what automakers are putting in the cars today, it’s pretty clear that more people want the technology. You can either adapt to the new offerings in cars, or you can go buy an old pos and drive that.
@@bryanbennett972I am a man, the reason I’m looking at forward is because I do want the technology and for is ahead in this aspect with their safety features. Apple car play is massive for GPS and I haven’t listened to the radio old school since 2013.
I drive a 2010 ford focus nicest car I have ever owned but my life has outgrown it and I need a all purpose vehicle with more space as well as being able to drive in bad weather conditions. Bluetooth by the way was common place back then and the fact that you don’t have a cellphone I don’t really believe because you can’t even do banking now a days without one since most bakes require a phone on record to receive verification texts.
Plus your also on RUclips on the internet right now
I have a mint 93 Ranger XLT SC with the 4.0 engine and it's 4x4 w only 140k miles. I Totally Love my Classic Ranger. One day I may get a new one. I'm liking the Raptor a lot. I just saw a 2020 Ranger Sport today in red, that's what got me started on possibly getting a new Ranger.
Finally someone talks about how hard-easy these vehicles are to get into. Thank you
The bed is too short.
There were several US market Rangers with 6ft beds spotted over the last year. Maybe it'll be a late release.
How about a real work truck with a full back end and just two doors
Nice truck. Couldn't wait for it to come out. I was seriously considering buying one. However, since Ford decided to price gouge its loyal customers by hiking the cost of the Ranger into what the F-150 used to cost only tells me their greed exceeds their concern. I'll pass.
It sucks that you can’t get a Ranger double cab with a 6’ bed, like is available on the Tacoma
I have a Ranger 4x4 I bought new in 2006 I really like the new Ranger's.
I died laughing when Tim looked into the camera and said, "I'm not 300 lbs."..comment section can be a cruel place..poor guy lol
Great video as always, Tim!
Power rear window, lockers, intelligent headlights, power radiator shutters, paddle shifters in the Raptor those you forgot to mention. And one correction the xlt heaflogjt are also LED but reflector type. Thanks my friend.
I love that color combo! And the tan interior!!! They don't even offer that in other markets!.
Good walk-around, but you didn’t mention that you can now lay 4x8 paneling flat on the bed floor like a full-size pickup. That’s a HUGE advantage the Ranger has over the midsize competitors. That is mentioned in the Ford press release.
Huge advantage? That's a stretch.....How much plywood do you think is getting carried around?
VW made this ã requirement
@@dand2334 That's a waste. If I knew I had to carry plywood that often, I would be buying a full-size. For the three times a year I do buy it, I'd use the raised bed on the GMC . Probably just shut the tailgate and stick it over which is even easier. Not going to buy a truck just because plywood can lay flat.
@@Dusdaddy it’s more than just plywood that is 4’ wide. In Europe VW sells this platform and there is a need to load a standardized European pallet in the bed of the truck
@@dand2334 But we ain't in Europe so my point still stands, it doesn't matter.
Still no sunroof? could have made it an option.
When it’s 97 degree and humid as all get out at the farm. The last thing I want is to wait for my tailgate to lower because my hands are full. Pull that handle and let it slam. Can’t believe how soft people have gotten, notice the manufacturers cater to it….like a four door option and now that’s all you can get. That’s why the price starts out so dang high
It is annoying sometimes, but I just push my dampened tailgate down when I don't wanna wait the extra 1.5 seconds.
I do totally get what you mean about people getting soft.. and it's backward when big companies cater to the weak mob mentality.
But I think that temporary trend is gonna be looked back upon with shame and ridicule after us real folk take back the narrative and make common sense great again. It's already started and now we can't be stopped as companies like Bud Light, Fox "News" and so on learn the hard way🤡
This next era is gonna be glorious👍🏻
ANd the bed is too high on the Ford to lean over the side
Tim love the reviews! I am excited about the increase in back seat comfort! Wish it was a 60 40 for ease if dog entry in rear or cargo on one side and a pac on the other. Huge positive change for me is 48 inches between the wheel wells sir! Now I can haul stuff on pallet! But please tell Ford we need a 6 foot bed behind this crew cab for more cargo! Tail gate down doesn't put the load center of mass in front of rear axle on a 5 foot bed but with a six foot bed a pallet load would be very safe and stable and within the payload of a ranger for around town delivery in tight places shining over a much larger foot print half ton.
I find it interesting that the XLT has the older tall shifter compared to what the Lariat had.
Isn't the Lariat a notch above XLT?
@@Dusdaddy Yes it is. To me it is odd that Ford would spend the money to have 2 different shifters in the same vehicle.
@@FBHSswimmer2006 Is one electronic vs mechanical?
@@Dusdaddy That is how it looks.
I was in the new Dodge, a couple years ago with the round electric knob shifter... On the test drive it malfunctioned... Drive was like being in neutral, and it wouldn't go nowhere.... After several tries and even opening and closing the door..... Had to turn the engine off, and restart....
I think that Step Up by the rear bumper is just that... 1 foot step in, hold on to the top of the bed, and lift the other leg over into the bed... You made it sound so hard to do or something.... :)
Wow, nice work, Ford. I like this new Ranger better than the new Colorado, if only for the better transmission. I still wish a manual was available (way to go, Toyota!). Seems to me that GM really did themselves a disservice by axing the baby Duramax. Without the diesel, there's not much to separate the Colorado from its peers.
I'd say the trannys are wash but the Ford has a better motor choice. Much better mpg for basically the same power.
Rear a/c and a 6ft bed please!! Nice video and overview. Which has a reputation better reliability and longevity the 2.3 or 2.7? 🤔
Tim great review!!! Love the truck. But the deal breaker for me is no 6 foot bed. Wonder why Toyota and Nissan give the consumer that choice but Ford and GM dictate to you.
I don't have any issues in the new Colorado sitting behind myself. I'll be interested to see the actual paper specs for all dimensions.
Love the V6 is coming back. Hope it will be in most trim levels. Not just the Raptor. Intrested in the king cab but most are only base XL trims.
I want to see a regular cab long bed 4x4 with roll up windows, no carpet, a/c, ps, pb, cruse control, tow package, steel wheels priced under $30k....All they want to sell are overpriced trucks loaded with garbage that will cause issues when there is a HUGE market for basic low priced vehicles.
Good to see Ford it’s making comfortable seats!
after seeing multiple videos on this truck, I've decided its def not worth the prices, hold your used vehicles longer guys
If the seats in these new ones are as good as the ones that were in my 21' then that alone is a reason to buy this new truck.
Interesting different shifter on xlt. Raptor model looks good. I like that there is more space in the interior.
Lol...yep, right fater Tim says how great the shifter is, the next truck has the old style.
I think the Canyon is better
Y?
@@robertchapman4488 Intrerior looks better. The screen is integrated into the dash neater. I do like the fold down back seat though. And typical Ford, you gotta option so many things into it.
@@Dusdaddy That's the same with the GM trucks. Some of the higher end Colorado's don't even have cruise control. Check out Andre from TFL's truck.
@@PlayWaves1 lol.....a TrailBoss isn't exactly "high end". All the GMC come with keyless entry and cruise.
@@PlayWaves1 the Trailboss is literally a WT trim with off road goodies. It is far from a “higher end” Colorado.
I want one, but It needs a longer bed option and a powerboost 2.7 before I'll trade my f150 for one.
I see Raiti back there hiding his twinkies.
Looks better than the outgoing model but still ugly IMO. The Canyon and Colorado beat it in every category, exterior styling, interior quality and layout. Toyota better bring it with the new Tacoma or GM is going to own this market.
Yup.
Fangirling much, the GM's are some seriously ugly munters !!
Love my 23 Trail Boss ! All I need and more.
Few plastic touches I could do with out but like the simple and functional layout
Plus looks bad ass !
There's a 3 memory setting on drivers door for your seat, side mirrors and steering wheel. Key fob for the xlt is too big, prefer the fob on my 2004 lariat pick up. I can't wait to get my '24 ranger.thenpricebblurb at 20:45is deceptive. Expect to pay about 50k. you deffo need an extended warranty with all the electronics.
Guess my new fav mid sizer will be between the Colorado and what ever I think about the Tacoma when it comes out. This is just ok,,,,looks like the out going model except for the diff front end….same way they did the f-150
Colorado for looks and specs on paper did incredible. I disagree on them with canceling the other engine types they normally carried. Chevy is very close to
Making some leading vehicles. Off subject. Stick that 2.7l into their trailblazers and trailblazers will double in sales
@@nogamblinge2671 no doubt on the engine choices….I wish they had kept a few others….I’m not much on 4 cyl turbos, I know it’s a strong engine. Just not my thing I guess.
10:35 There's a handle above your head, but yeah, I'd rather it be in the "B" pillar. Agreed on the foot step into bed. It should be standard on a truck. It's not some tech marvel and would probably reduce manufacturing costs by only offering it one way like you said. I'm not sure how I feel about vertical screen. I initially liked them when RAM did it, but with time I'm not liking it as much. At least they're starting to semi-integrate them into dashboards now as opposed to sticking a tablet.
Would consider this over the rest just for the v6 even though all the others are better looking trucks.
The recent model Ridgeline has a decent back seat area. This one looks similar in terms of the amount of space. Not bad.
True the Honda backseat isn't bad at all
Interesting the gear shifter is different between XLT and Lariat. Think I prefer XLT, more “truckish” and less sedan.
No extended cab option. No 6ft bed. No truck for me. So sad....😢😢
Leaf springs??? 🙈
Like the radio side to side rather then up and down radio.
Yes and if all the nimrods would just quit buying them the price just might go down.
This is a heavy refresh, the cab is a carry over and identical to last years, just has new interior. That’s why there is no sunroof option.
The all new GMC AND Colorado look better!
They forgot to put AC in the back of the passengers. Just like the Bronco
The new canyon looks a lot better inside and out
In your opinion; in my opinon, they aren't as fugly as the Colorado and near every recent GM truck !!
Well, Tim, as far as the truck you're gonna buy for the channel? I think that if you were to purchase any of the newly released midsize trucks you wouldn't go wrong. I was thinking maybe the r
Ranger since you seem to think the seats are so comfortable. You should probably stay away from the Raptor even though it's pretty cool. I think most of us are more likely to purchase one of the other trims. We already know about the 2.3 so definitely equipped with the 2.7.
Last time I looked at a 2023 Ranger, the local dealer had an $8K “Market Adjustment” , plus their $2K, “Special Dealer Benefits”, no thanks.
Nothing to brag about, but not too shabby either, but it's either Canyon or Taco now
Good review! Interior is much improved, but no push start on the XLT is a bummer. Optional sidestep should be standard too.
Yeah, pretty sad for an XLT
Idk maybe it's just preference, but I consider that a win lol.
I TOO have a COMPLAINT about the 2024 FORD RANGER. I THINK THE 2024 FORD RANGER is a GOOD LOOKING TRUCK but, to GET THE CONVENIENCE OF ALL WHEEL DRIVE, YOU have to STEP UP TO THE RAPTOR. I currently have a 2022 FORD RANGER LARIAT...I THINK I'LL KEEP IT. Another option (if i want a TRUCK) maybe look at a 2023 CHEVY COLORADO. TO GET a RAPTOR WITH 4WHEEL DRIVE is around $60,000. CHEVY COLORADO can BE HAD WITH FULL TIME ALL WHEEL DRIVE (IN LT ) FOR LESS.
Lol I watched Raitis video and wondered who was videoing the other truck in the background and here I am discovering your channel.
Yup! Joe is a great guy and friend.
Im looking forward to seeing the crewcab with a 6' bed!
Don't think there will be a 6' bed option.
@@jerryavlon4780 it was spied and it will come later
@@jerryavlon4780 then Ford should not have said they were including that configuration for the new model.
Gotcha. Guess i was thinking Extended cab and 6' bed. Either way this is a nice truck. I'll be downsizing from a F150 2.7 ecoboost so we'll see.
@@jerryavlon4780 if that's the case, the longer wheelbase Ranger would make a nice replacement. I think mid sized crew cabs with 6' beds are very practical. Being 6" or so narrower than full sized makes them easier to live with.
Why cant we have colum shifters so it opens up all the center console room? Shifters in the middle, nob or shifter, just annoy the crap out of me. And why cant we get a longer bed?
The shifter was different from the XLT to the Lariot. L feel that shifter should have been across all models
You can hear Raiti zonks and balls In the back ground 😅
Nice truck cod Tim. The Raptor is a bargain in the Raptor family. Not the most capable version, but still very impressive.
I used to comment more when you had the PowerBoost F150. I switched from my PowerBoost to a Tremor with the Torsen front differential and ProPower Onboard. The power was more than enough.
I have since gotten rid of all my new vehicles while I still could get most of my $$ back. I’m kinda protesting new vehicles pricing. The large increases are problematic, especially now that Ram is discounting their pickups quite heavily. Some poor bugger bought a Ram last year for over asking & now sees up to 20% off of retail. (Here in Alberta Canada) I respect buyer beware, but sooo many owners are owing so much more than what a brand new truck of identical content sells for this year!! Ugghhhh.
My current newest 4x4 that can go off-road is a 79 GMC, loaded up for the year and running a serious powertrain, fuel injected 503 (because I can 😂😂) with the 6 speed automatic, lifted on 33s and lockers front & rear. It does not ride nearly as nice as the worst riding new products mind you,,,, 😂😂. My newest truck is a 2003 F150 Lightning (one of 3 I own). I daily drive my 2001 Lightning and have another Lightning from 1995. All are mint, but the 2003 & 1995 have less than 40,000 km on them each. They get lightly driven, the 20p1 is a truck! I tow with it, everything. I have a 2002 Harley Davidson F150 on factory 22” wheels and with 4wd, but it’s a mall crawler. Easy to get into because it’s low. Tows well though. It’s my SUV so to speak.
I have 24bother classic trucks I drive off & on, including a 66 C10 283 automatic that is restored to rock stock,,, thought you might like that one, but the rest are mostly 67-72 C10 & K10 models.
I decided to get into vehicles that generally don’t depreciate and appreciate instead!! Make some money, yet get to drive as well!!
If I get a new vehicle it will be one of 2 F350 DuperCab Dually XLT 4x4 s my buddy has coming into his dealership. The most base trucks that still have heated seats & 5th wheel prep. 7.3 gas and a 6.7 diesel. I will be hauling a slide in, box mounted, Arctic Fox truck camper with slide out. I’m sure the gas powertrain is more than enough for that,,,, but the HO diesel is soo nice as well. 😊
Keep ‘em coming!! Just thought it would touch base. I am busier than ever so I don’t often get to get this close to being caught up!! I like the new Tundras a lot!! They were a consideration before I decided everything is too expensive. A SR5 Double Cab TRD Off-Road model is a very good price for today’s market.
Later, Eh!!
Interesting. Here in NZ we have rear AC vents, and the bed side steps is standard on all trims.
Here in the states manufacturers have been removing items from packages as a money grab. So you have to pay even more. Nothing but greed.
@@CJ-fh8up yep, and they don’t offer a push button start unless you buy a $45k Lariat… but you can go buy a 7 year old based model Nissan Altima and it will have push button start
You need to mention Ford like the prior Ranger provides Amber Turn Lamps on the tail lights ….Toyota Nissan, Chevy /GMC Honda do not!
Id have to play around with the build and price once it comes out, but from what Ive seen here, the GM twins take the win for me. Nicer interior, and more available features. Lack of 4auto here is a bummer considering it's available in Europe/Australia
The GM has nicer? I don't think so
Gotta agree. The GM just looks and seems to function better. The way the integrated that screen is nice. I do like how the back seat folds flat though.
What more available features are you referring to? They make you pay for cruise control.
@@PlayWaves1 Ok, more standard features. Granted, we don't know pricing yet but an XLT w/o keyless and an available bed step? Who knows? Maybe an optioned out XLT will be cheaper than the like GM? But we don't know because they didn't load pricing with the reveal.
@@PlayWaves1 IMO the Ranger missed out on a few key features:
- Lack of horizontal screen means your eyes will be totally off the road when looking at it.
- no rear air vents
- no 4auto.
- the rear side bedstep is pretty much useless with the tailgate down unlike the corner steps in the GM twins.
- no available sunroof
- a sea of cheap looking grey plastic all the cabin even on Lariat.
Some pros over the GM twins:
- available V6
- rear seats fold down not just up
- can apparently fit a 4x8 flat between the wheel wells
- base smaller digital gauge cluster looks better than the GM twins
Overall, I think the GM twins win out over the new Ranger.
Ford always had the best seats! I love that Ranger!
I guess he missed the grab handles in the roof above the rear door window.
Yeah, this guy is not a reviewer.... Just some clueless person who thinks he can make videos... :)
Wow good stuff Gord!
Great review 👍🏻
The lack of 4wd auto is very disappointing.
Good to see they made a usable rear seat.
It didn't make any sense to offer these as a 4-door, compromise the bed length, and then not really be able to have rear passengers sit back there for anything other than a very short ride.
True but to go thru all that effort on a redesign and no rear air vents? Really Ford? They finally put in a trailer brake but no rear air vents? I dont get that as they put these vents on most of their line up
@@kennordsfan1494 I didn't notice that - you're absolutely correct!
@@kennordsfan1494 Blame your fellow Americans, as the rest of the world DOES GET REAR VENTILATION !!
Thanks Tim. Good lookin truck. I like the butt impressions you do, can't think of any other reviewer that does that very important thing. I mean, if the seat is not comfy, it makes for a hated truck on long rides. Also, see u realized the "leaked" photo of taco was fake. Gotta be careful.
So what are the advantages of putting the step in the body instead of the bumper? Or did they just need to adopt GM’s feature without copying them exactly?
Ford claims they are more durable over a long period of time and can handle weight better.
@@Pickuptrucktalk but it’s built into the structure and not the actual frame, like initially stated. I would think the bumper will be more durable and last longer with constant pressure applied vs. a part of the actual structural siding of the truck. Idk 🤷🏾♂️
GM's bumper steps are definitely better designed.
What about towing and cargo? Power rear window? Heated seats what about cooling?
What about it? Same towing as last year but they are offering the silly little "trailer knob" like the F-150. According to other reviewers, the rear window is powered. Not sure what level gets cooled seats.
I like the overseas version better. 😢 I would get the wild track version if I could.
The US version is surprisingly bland
I notice the Raptor is rated at 405 hp. The Australian Raptor is rated at 292 kW which converts to 397 hp. I wonder if the difference is down to a different tune or fuel type.
If I knew for sure that Ford has resolved their transmission issues, this is a truck I might want. However, my brother and son in law each had 2019 Rangers, and the transmission in each of them began slamming into gear, "hunting" for a gear on the highway, and generally not working correctly. (Each of those had a 10 speed transmission, BTW). Any idea if Ford has resolved this?
All the trim levels in Australia have the rear step to access the bed except for the Raptor which doesn’t because of the fancy multi mode exhaust system it has under there. I don’t understand why some non Raptor American trim levels don’t have it.
I noticed that too. Here in N.Z the bed side steps is standard on all trims (minius Raptor ofcourse).
Are owners of the Raptor so dense they don’t know where the steering wheel location is without having an orange marker.
Ranger Rear leg room 34.6 Maverick 36.5 F150 43 cmon Ford giving the Ranger 2 more inches of leg room wouldn’t hurt.
That would mean shrinking the bed by 2 inches. Which would you prefer? More legroom with shorter bed, or less legroom with same size bed?
@@Pickuptrucktalk same bed more leg room. 2 inches would still make it smaller than the F150 and give it equivalent leg room to the smaller Maverick
@@stevesafety6743 all midsize trucks are built to a specific length to fit into a garage. That's why they all have the same bed length and why they all have the same dimensions. Going 2" bigger would mean it doesn't fit into traditional garages.
Automakers, like Ford, tell me fitting into a garage is at the top of the purchase reasons for a midsize truck. They don't dare mess with that length.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I’d like to put that to a test. 1 most people use their garage for storage not cars. And I would think the engineers could find some way if increasing leg room without increasing overall length. But hey I believe it’s 2 more inches than the Tacoma gives it’s rear passengers
3 Tacomas in my neighborhood and all are parked in the driveway not the garage
Ford just announced cutting components and pricing.
Let us see how that goes in improve quality and affordability.
They should have put the screen the other way now one looks like you're going to have to look Down on the screen.
I think the 3.3 Engine would be perfect in this Truck.
No manual transmission and no longer bed option is a major FAIL for Ford. I won't be buying one.
Geez Ford engine bay always look like a mess
What about a 2” lift/ leveling kit? So those 2023 GMC Canyons are not looking down on us.
I noticed that they finally went away from the piano black finish on the center console area, that’s a good change, but also noticed that the shifter in the XLT is different than that in the Lariot trim.
Yea cause it’s impossible to not scratch!
Ford. I need a real midsize truck. Not a 4 seat SUV with a little bed in the back. Bring back bed and cab options like you had a few years ago. Single cab, extended cab, crew cab. 5 foot, 6 foot and 7 foot bed options. Trucks are supposed to have optional configurations.
Tim, there was a grab handle above the rear seat on the headliner.
And I prefer that the tailgate be capable of lowering it below level line, because there are things I need to load in the back that I want to get closer to floor before lifting, and so I don't need to lift them as high, the tailgate becomes a ramp. The damper feature is a negative to me, because I'm seeing that Ford now tethers the tailgate cables with that design feature, you can't quickly release the side cables.
It depends on the country, the Aussies get more choices to select from, including 3.0 litre diesel biturbo. The philippines very few accessories from Ford. Only Wildtrack and Raptor comes with rear a/c vents. I think the safety sensors should be across all models.