Security Puppet Theory; Henry went to jail for the MCI, he built the Security Puppet while one trial and it was implemented at the Freddy's location after he was locked away. This is why Afton takes advantage of Charlie getting's locked out of the building, to avoid the puppet. This is also why Charlie was bullied by other children; because her father was sent to prison. Children often bully kids who's parents have been arrested, convicted and then locked up. It could also be argued that Afton could only work up the "nerve" to do it after Henry wasn't there to protect his own daughter. The main reason children are targeted in crimes by adults is that the adult criminal is trying to only pick "one-sided fights" they know that they will win. Afton has never seen shown being "brave enough" to target an adult, so if he were trying to get "back" at Henry for something, it would make sense for him to not only go after the guy's daughter, but to also do it at a time and place where it's unlikely the father would be there to stop it / beat the ever-living pixels out of the purple guy.
Honestly i prefer William just being a psychopath instead of having a tragic breaking moment or whatever. Grieving parents don't just start killing and mutilating children no matter how much pain they're going through. All the sci-fi murder bot stuff is ridiculous but it'd be ridiculous no matter where in the timeline it was placed imho.
tbh I agree. Never liked 'WillCare'. If anything at all, I could see CCs death hurting his ego and adding fuel to the fire. Definitely already a psychopath tho
I kinda disagree, I feel like giving him a motivation can make him have more depth and just how much of a psychopath he is. Which I think he always ways even before death of cc
I also don't believe that Afton's motive is grief. In the books, there's a scene where Afton punched toddler-Elizabeth in the face when she dared to interrupt him at work. Book!Elizabeth directly says that her father only cared about the Baby-Charlie robot (in terms of family). CC doesn't seem to be part of the Afton family i the movies or the books. In the games, he only indirectly became Afton's son in sister location when Mike was revealed to be Afton's son. CC being part of the Afton family was certainly not Scott's intention when he released fnaf 4. There's no real indication that "I will put you back togehter" line is from William. Especially since the exact same line is said by an unknown character in fnaf world who is definitely not William. Although I do believe that William used the Fredbear Plushie later in his experiments. Also, there is nothing to suggest that William killed Charlie because he blames Henry for his son's death. The Silver eyes implies that Afton killed the children because he was jealous of Henry having a loving family . Afton having children and his him being a mad scientist were probably later concepts
I’ve always interpreted the events as -Fredbear’s opens -Freddy’s opens -boy watches a walking gold bar spring load a McDonald’s worker -golden bear eats child circa 1983 -Charlie gets a drive by -Fredbear’s closes -little girl try’s ice cream and gets ze claw -purple man feels a little fruity and on the mood to stabby stab -Freddy’s closes That’s how I’ve always interpreted it and mostly bc it follows with the other parallels with the books at the time and fits with the evidence of everything, with every piece of media released to me personally it seems that this order comes more airtight, if u follow the interpretation of the help wnated 2 graves being the order they were set free instead of killed, but I know people will always try to argue it one way or another, that’s always kinda been the problem with Fnaf, I can think of abt 2-3 diff timelines in my head with completely different order of events and everyone of em can explain every little detail to a tee with evidence, so at the end of the day it’s always gonna be your own interpretation on what you think the logical events of the timeline are, so just always remember to be respectful and consider other theories when talking abt Fnaf, or any franchise, u don’t have to agree with them, but don’t be rude abt it, it’s always helpful to look at others peoples perspectives with fresh eyes and see how you can add it to ur own ideas :D TLDR: don’t be a respectless dick when theorizing, also local news a orange and Geraic man are competing to rule a failing country but instead are arguing abt golf
To be fair, even though Nightmare Fredbear has teeth in his midsection, all the (main cast) Nightmare Animatronics have horizontal opening on their midsections. This could maybe imply Michael saw Elizabeth’s death at some point, and sees Fredbear as the worst of the Nightmare Animatronics possibly as his guilt ‘eating him up’ for accidentally killing his younger brother (as people forget the characters in the mini-games are not the same characters played in the respective main game)
The way you described the Andrew theory was very convincing, and it could tie into what steel wool was saying about wanting to tell stories about the origins of Freddy’s
It took me a while, but I 100% believe now it’s Charlie The stage 01 kids are the same kids in the security puppet mini game And in the sister location breaker room map puppet is not marked in the Fredbear and that was created in 1983 So that would mean security puppet has already been taken out
I like how no less than 5 people have been forwarded as candiates(Cassidy, Crying Child, Charlie, Susie, and Elizabeth). I've got my own theory idea to pitch. You curious?
Personally, the main thing that convinced me of SusieFirst is the second part of her line: "I have seen everything." And it's not that she just says it, she also places a notable amount of emphasis on the word "everything," which would imply that it's not just simplifying. It's much more explicit & direct than Henry's "A wound first inflicted on me," which is a line that could have a variety of different meanings. So my reasoning is, if Susie wasn't the first victim overall, she wouldn't have seen everything.
MCI is confirmed to happen in 1985 The I have seen everything it’s true because the spirit has seen all of the main events Fnaf 2 Fnaf 1 Fnaf SL Fnaf 6 Also, maybe fnaf 4 if you think nightmare mci is true
@@Sonicmid The Bite of 83 is a main event. Charlie's murder is a main event. And that's why I pointed out how Susie places emphasis on "everything." It's strange to do so if she missed a considerable amount of important stuff.
But if that’s the case Susie wouldn’t be part of the mci but we know that Susie is part of the mci kids u could be correct but William timeline hasn’t killed anyone yet and cc had to be first bcuz two things he cc dies in 83 and the mci kids died in between late 83 to 87 most likely 85 but Susie could have been the second or third for sure but it’s a theory a game theory 😂😂😂
Hear me out, hear me out, what if you play as William afton in fnaf 4 and he’s actually having prophecies of his future creations which he actually based his animatronics on, but then the idea that he based this all off of a couple of nightmares gave him an existential crisis that made him insane and that’s why he started killing. (Jk)
My theory is that the crying child runs away in Midnight Motorist and goes to Freddy’s where he sees the puppet lying on Charlie corpse and believes that the puppet killed her
In my opinion, I think that CC was first, then Charlie, then the MCI happens, and then finally I HAVE NO IDEA WHEN ELIZABETH DIED LOL. Her death could honestly go anywhere.
I have perhaps a stupid question- is it a fact that the MCI were a series of back to back incidents or is it possible one of the disappearances was later linked to it despite happening at a different time? I’m pretty sure it does confirm that but I’m not sure all of a sudden. Cuz if they weren’t then it makes sense for Susie to be first? And her disappearance was only linked later on to the whole incident.
I personally believe it’s Charlotte (Web) and I personally don’t believe in the theory that Aubergine Mna started killing because of EvanBearCC’s death. In F.N.A.F.4, the FredBear plush acts mean towards EvanBearCC, and in F.N.A.F.5 it appears in the private room with a walkie talkie, and that room belongs to Aubergine Man so he must be the FredBear plush, meaning Aubergine Man was saying some mean things towards EvanBearCC. “He hates you” “He knows you hate it here.” Doesn’t sound like a caring father who would help his child out, even if he’s busy, he shouldn’t just stand idly by like that, and wouldn’t say stuff like that. To me, he probably was evil from the start, and perhaps all the craziness of F.N.A.F like the Circus Baby stuff happened earlier like before F.N.A.F.4. There’s a FredBear suit in the backstage that Evan was locked in, and there seems to be hair sticking out, possibly? I don’t completely agree with this, BUT it could tie into the idea that whatever Evan saw, was Aubergine Man wearing a suit, and luring a kid into the backstage and killing them, and the hair sticking out is that victim. Problem I have though is that it’s never brought up again, and I don’t think it’s FredBear plush either as I believe it’s Aubergine Man like I mentioned earlier. In the Encyclopedia, it said EvanBearCC was haunted by the nightmares which ties in to the nightmare experiments seen in F.N.A.F.5 and Dittophobia. Aubergine Man probably pinned him against fake animatronics to scare him. Now there’s a theory that it’s actually Aubergine Man Jr (Michael Schmidt) and the nights in F.N.A.F.4 are nightmares but I personally don’t believe it but I see the points of that theory. F.N.A.F.5 confirms that they’re real, and Dittophobia, regardless of being in the same continuity, says they are real. Now back on topic, as the FredBear plush, he tells Evan he’ll “put him back together” which is something Aubergine Man Jr says he did with Circus Baby as he said in F.N.A.F.5 “It’s me Michael” cutscene. This is strange, I’m not sure what that means, Circus Baby was already possessed by Elizabeth, but it seems that she cares for her father in F.N.A.F.6 unlike in F.N.A.F.5 where she wanted him dead. Maybe it’s the memory theory? I mean all he did was just do technical stuff and remove a green card from her, and she got scooped, and formed as Ennard by combining with the other animatronics. Now why would Aubergine Man say this? My answer is that he just knows how to, it’s never explained in the games. I guess it adds to his craziness. As for the Chomp of 83 being the motivation for his killings, the thing is, I don’t go by speculating, making my own connections to fill in gaps or explain things, at least now I don’t do that. Not everyone is the same, so people will make their own connections which probably won’t align with what Scott intended. Never has Aubergine Man shown his remorse for the death of his son, the series never reflects on that, and as such, I don’t believe it. Aubergine Man was always shown to be crazy in different continuities, always thinking about himself. There’s some things that are different from each continuity, like Give Gift, Give Life mini-games which I think shows The Puppet stuffing the kids in the suits, I think it’s a retcon from F.N.A.F.1, in my opinion at least. The F.N.A.F.1 movie is especially different with having Mike not be related to Aubergine Shaggy, and Vanessa existed since the 80’s or 70’s, and is Aubergine Shaggy’s daughter, and the M.C.I happened in 1987 as the end credits song says. But Aubergine Man being a crazy murderer that wasn’t filled with grief in all continuities seems to be consistent to me. Games, novels, books, and now the F.N.A.F.1 movie. Plus, when it was just F.N.A.F1-3 Aubergine Man was always evil, he didn’t have a motivation, he was just evil, and in later games, it never showed him grieving over Evan so I think he’s still evil. So that is when I think.
Agreed, I don't think he could care less about his kids lol. I love your point about Afton being shown as entirely self centered in other continuities. I think people overlook the way characters act in alternate media. It can be a useful clue 👍
Wait, what about help wanted 2, and the gravestones that show up within the princess quest ending. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, I mean the one with the gravestones that you have to get in order to get the secret Bonnie mask. That labels Susie a.k.a. Chica to be in the order while Charlie to be last. That’s kind of the reason why I believe in Susie first more so than Charlie first, because then what would be the point of showing that .
Yep that's a great point. There's also colored balloons in security breach (monty golf) that people think might give the death order based on the balloon color
The graves kinda f3ck a lot of the timelines up, if Susie is apart of the mci then she would’ve died in 1985 but if Charlie died in 83 then she would have died before the mci. And if Charlie died last why was she the one to have helped the rest into possession and not Susie? I kinda believe that the gravestones is the order in who was put to rest. With Charlie being last as in the happiest day mini game her mask hits the ground last.
What is seen in the dark is often misunderstood in the mind of a child The suit is just wires but in the dark and wit the rumor Dave the crying child saw a body in the suit fueling his existence fear The bite happens in 83 Charlie probably also dies in 83 Elizabeth is probably 85 or 86 depending when circus baby’s open before 87 After the fredbears and the dirst first location closed after the MCI
The whole elizabeth thing was agreee upon to happen after the MCI after sfton understands remnant, so elizabeth dies somewhere around late 1985 or 1986
Ok this may have been looked at already but given the mediocre melody all share a child soul respectively what if they were first maybe they were the original mascots and the two golden ones are just for William (bunny) and Henry (Fredbear) because the melody are much older given they require a battery to be attached at all times while the golden ones don’t have this same battery implying they are much newer it’s the only way to Explain the mini games in fnaf 3 like why are there just random victims that everyone has seemed to completely gloss over then after that it’s CC Then Charlie then the main gang, I just have no idea where to put Elizabeth and Jeremy (fnaf 2) also does Jeremy (fnaf 2) and Jeremy (HW1) also count as victims??
Into the pit of full of Easter eggs that aren’t related to canon so the poster is pretty meaningless Into the pit has so many contradictions on the real McI
My mans so scared he behind da crib 🔥🔥
Security Puppet Theory; Henry went to jail for the MCI, he built the Security Puppet while one trial and it was implemented at the Freddy's location after he was locked away. This is why Afton takes advantage of Charlie getting's locked out of the building, to avoid the puppet. This is also why Charlie was bullied by other children; because her father was sent to prison. Children often bully kids who's parents have been arrested, convicted and then locked up. It could also be argued that Afton could only work up the "nerve" to do it after Henry wasn't there to protect his own daughter. The main reason children are targeted in crimes by adults is that the adult criminal is trying to only pick "one-sided fights" they know that they will win. Afton has never seen shown being "brave enough" to target an adult, so if he were trying to get "back" at Henry for something, it would make sense for him to not only go after the guy's daughter, but to also do it at a time and place where it's unlikely the father would be there to stop it / beat the ever-living pixels out of the purple guy.
Honestly i prefer William just being a psychopath instead of having a tragic breaking moment or whatever. Grieving parents don't just start killing and mutilating children no matter how much pain they're going through. All the sci-fi murder bot stuff is ridiculous but it'd be ridiculous no matter where in the timeline it was placed imho.
tbh I agree. Never liked 'WillCare'. If anything at all, I could see CCs death hurting his ego and adding fuel to the fire. Definitely already a psychopath tho
Yeah, people keep trying to see what turned William's life upside down, his wife, his daughters death, his son's death
But there was no moment
In the books Fazbear was the world to him and he saw the spirits as spending an eternity there as a paradise incarnate
Even wanting to be like them
I kinda disagree, I feel like giving him a motivation can make him have more depth and just how much of a psychopath he is. Which I think he always ways even before death of cc
I also don't believe that Afton's motive is grief. In the books, there's a scene where Afton punched toddler-Elizabeth in the face when she dared to interrupt him at work. Book!Elizabeth directly says that her father only cared about the Baby-Charlie robot (in terms of family). CC doesn't seem to be part of the Afton family i the movies or the books. In the games, he only indirectly became Afton's son in sister location when Mike was revealed to be Afton's son. CC being part of the Afton family was certainly not Scott's intention when he released fnaf 4. There's no real indication that "I will put you back togehter" line is from William. Especially since the exact same line is said by an unknown character in fnaf world who is definitely not William. Although I do believe that William used the Fredbear Plushie later in his experiments. Also, there is nothing to suggest that William killed Charlie because he blames Henry for his son's death. The Silver eyes implies that Afton killed the children because he was jealous of Henry having a loving family . Afton having children and his him being a mad scientist were probably later concepts
I’ve always interpreted the events as
-Fredbear’s opens
-Freddy’s opens
-boy watches a walking gold bar spring load a McDonald’s worker
-golden bear eats child circa 1983
-Charlie gets a drive by
-Fredbear’s closes
-little girl try’s ice cream and gets ze claw
-purple man feels a little fruity and on the mood to stabby stab
-Freddy’s closes
That’s how I’ve always interpreted it and mostly bc it follows with the other parallels with the books at the time and fits with the evidence of everything, with every piece of media released to me personally it seems that this order comes more airtight, if u follow the interpretation of the help wnated 2 graves being the order they were set free instead of killed, but I know people will always try to argue it one way or another, that’s always kinda been the problem with Fnaf, I can think of abt 2-3 diff timelines in my head with completely different order of events and everyone of em can explain every little detail to a tee with evidence, so at the end of the day it’s always gonna be your own interpretation on what you think the logical events of the timeline are, so just always remember to be respectful and consider other theories when talking abt Fnaf, or any franchise, u don’t have to agree with them, but don’t be rude abt it, it’s always helpful to look at others peoples perspectives with fresh eyes and see how you can add it to ur own ideas :D
TLDR: don’t be a respectless dick when theorizing, also local news a orange and Geraic man are competing to rule a failing country but instead are arguing abt golf
Goated comment
To be fair, even though Nightmare Fredbear has teeth in his midsection, all the (main cast) Nightmare Animatronics have horizontal opening on their midsections.
This could maybe imply Michael saw Elizabeth’s death at some point, and sees Fredbear as the worst of the Nightmare Animatronics possibly as his guilt ‘eating him up’ for accidentally killing his younger brother (as people forget the characters in the mini-games are not the same characters played in the respective main game)
Cassidy and Elizabeth CANNOT be the first
The way you described the Andrew theory was very convincing, and it could tie into what steel wool was saying about wanting to tell stories about the origins of Freddy’s
It took me a while, but I 100% believe now it’s Charlie
The stage 01 kids are the same kids in the security puppet mini game
And in the sister location breaker room map puppet is not marked in the Fredbear and that was created in 1983
So that would mean security puppet has already been taken out
Charlie is my personal favorite choice too 👍 I interpret William as being evil right from the start
I like how no less than 5 people have been forwarded as candiates(Cassidy, Crying Child, Charlie, Susie, and Elizabeth).
I've got my own theory idea to pitch. You curious?
Sure! What is it
Personally, the main thing that convinced me of SusieFirst is the second part of her line: "I have seen everything." And it's not that she just says it, she also places a notable amount of emphasis on the word "everything," which would imply that it's not just simplifying. It's much more explicit & direct than Henry's "A wound first inflicted on me," which is a line that could have a variety of different meanings.
So my reasoning is, if Susie wasn't the first victim overall, she wouldn't have seen everything.
MCI is confirmed to happen in 1985
The I have seen everything it’s true because the spirit has seen all of the main events
Fnaf 2
Fnaf 1
Fnaf SL
Fnaf 6
Also, maybe fnaf 4 if you think nightmare mci is true
@@Sonicmid The Bite of 83 is a main event. Charlie's murder is a main event.
And that's why I pointed out how Susie places emphasis on "everything." It's strange to do so if she missed a considerable amount of important stuff.
@@UnoriginalJokester Maybe she just saw the mci and everything after? Unless Susie wasn't in the MCI and died before everyone else in 1983
@@dillydraws Again, that's why I felt the need to emphasize her usage of the word "everything."
But if that’s the case Susie wouldn’t be part of the mci but we know that Susie is part of the mci kids u could be correct but William timeline hasn’t killed anyone yet and cc had to be first bcuz two things he cc dies in 83 and the mci kids died in between late 83 to 87 most likely 85 but Susie could have been the second or third for sure but it’s a theory a game theory 😂😂😂
Hear me out, hear me out, what if you play as William afton in fnaf 4 and he’s actually having prophecies of his future creations which he actually based his animatronics on, but then the idea that he based this all off of a couple of nightmares gave him an existential crisis that made him insane and that’s why he started killing. (Jk)
There’s more evidence of this then Foxybro being the dreamer tbh
I think that afton was an arogant,envious asshole from the begining, however after the bite he finally snapped
My theory is that the crying child runs away in Midnight Motorist and goes to Freddy’s where he sees the puppet lying on Charlie corpse and believes that the puppet killed her
I should add that I didn’t come up with this theory, it’s just my favorite.
CharlieFredbear's better
Puppet is also Fredbear so that could work
In my opinion, I think that CC was first, then Charlie, then the MCI happens, and then finally I HAVE NO IDEA WHEN ELIZABETH DIED LOL. Her death could honestly go anywhere.
What is seen in the shadows can be easily misunderstood in the eyes of a child
I've always interpreted Chica's line as the first murder from the MCI, not the first murder overall. The gravestones from HW2 threw me off.
How would you judge SammyFirst, KelseyFirst, RoryFirst, JakeFirst, BrooksFirst, and CassidyFirst?
I have perhaps a stupid question- is it a fact that the MCI were a series of back to back incidents or is it possible one of the disappearances was later linked to it despite happening at a different time? I’m pretty sure it does confirm that but I’m not sure all of a sudden.
Cuz if they weren’t then it makes sense for Susie to be first? And her disappearance was only linked later on to the whole incident.
T DREADS!!! DROP ANOTHER FNAF VIDEO, AND MY LIFE IS YOURS!!!!
I personally believe it’s Charlotte (Web) and I personally don’t believe in the theory that Aubergine Mna started killing because of EvanBearCC’s death.
In F.N.A.F.4, the FredBear plush acts mean towards EvanBearCC, and in F.N.A.F.5 it appears in the private room with a walkie talkie, and that room belongs to Aubergine Man so he must be the FredBear plush, meaning Aubergine Man was saying some mean things towards EvanBearCC. “He hates you” “He knows you hate it here.” Doesn’t sound like a caring father who would help his child out, even if he’s busy, he shouldn’t just stand idly by like that, and wouldn’t say stuff like that.
To me, he probably was evil from the start, and perhaps all the craziness of F.N.A.F like the Circus Baby stuff happened earlier like before F.N.A.F.4.
There’s a FredBear suit in the backstage that Evan was locked in, and there seems to be hair sticking out, possibly? I don’t completely agree with this, BUT it could tie into the idea that whatever Evan saw, was Aubergine Man wearing a suit, and luring a kid into the backstage and killing them, and the hair sticking out is that victim. Problem I have though is that it’s never brought up again, and I don’t think it’s FredBear plush either as I believe it’s Aubergine Man like I mentioned earlier.
In the Encyclopedia, it said EvanBearCC was haunted by the nightmares which ties in to the nightmare experiments seen in F.N.A.F.5 and Dittophobia. Aubergine Man probably pinned him against fake animatronics to scare him.
Now there’s a theory that it’s actually Aubergine Man Jr (Michael Schmidt) and the nights in F.N.A.F.4 are nightmares but I personally don’t believe it but I see the points of that theory. F.N.A.F.5 confirms that they’re real, and Dittophobia, regardless of being in the same continuity, says they are real.
Now back on topic, as the FredBear plush, he tells Evan he’ll “put him back together” which is something Aubergine Man Jr says he did with Circus Baby as he said in F.N.A.F.5 “It’s me Michael” cutscene. This is strange, I’m not sure what that means, Circus Baby was already possessed by Elizabeth, but it seems that she cares for her father in F.N.A.F.6 unlike in F.N.A.F.5 where she wanted him dead. Maybe it’s the memory theory? I mean all he did was just do technical stuff and remove a green card from her, and she got scooped, and formed as Ennard by combining with the other animatronics.
Now why would Aubergine Man say this? My answer is that he just knows how to, it’s never explained in the games. I guess it adds to his craziness.
As for the Chomp of 83 being the motivation for his killings, the thing is, I don’t go by speculating, making my own connections to fill in gaps or explain things, at least now I don’t do that. Not everyone is the same, so people will make their own connections which probably won’t align with what Scott intended. Never has Aubergine Man shown his remorse for the death of his son, the series never reflects on that, and as such, I don’t believe it. Aubergine Man was always shown to be crazy in different continuities, always thinking about himself.
There’s some things that are different from each continuity, like Give Gift, Give Life mini-games which I think shows The Puppet stuffing the kids in the suits, I think it’s a retcon from F.N.A.F.1, in my opinion at least. The F.N.A.F.1 movie is especially different with having Mike not be related to Aubergine Shaggy, and Vanessa existed since the 80’s or 70’s, and is Aubergine Shaggy’s daughter, and the M.C.I happened in 1987 as the end credits song says.
But Aubergine Man being a crazy murderer that wasn’t filled with grief in all continuities seems to be consistent to me. Games, novels, books, and now the F.N.A.F.1 movie.
Plus, when it was just F.N.A.F1-3 Aubergine Man was always evil, he didn’t have a motivation, he was just evil, and in later games, it never showed him grieving over Evan so I think he’s still evil.
So that is when I think.
Agreed, I don't think he could care less about his kids lol. I love your point about Afton being shown as entirely self centered in other continuities. I think people overlook the way characters act in alternate media. It can be a useful clue 👍
@@TDReads
Thanks! Also just want to ask, what do you think about my other points?
Also you reply fast.
Wait, what about help wanted 2, and the gravestones that show up within the princess quest ending. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, I mean the one with the gravestones that you have to get in order to get the secret Bonnie mask. That labels Susie a.k.a. Chica to be in the order while Charlie to be last.
That’s kind of the reason why I believe in Susie first more so than Charlie first, because then what would be the point of showing that .
Yep that's a great point. There's also colored balloons in security breach (monty golf) that people think might give the death order based on the balloon color
The graves kinda f3ck a lot of the timelines up, if Susie is apart of the mci then she would’ve died in 1985 but if Charlie died in 83 then she would have died before the mci. And if Charlie died last why was she the one to have helped the rest into possession and not Susie?
I kinda believe that the gravestones is the order in who was put to rest. With Charlie being last as in the happiest day mini game her mask hits the ground last.
What is seen in the dark is often misunderstood in the mind of a child
The suit is just wires but in the dark and wit the rumor Dave the crying child saw a body in the suit fueling his existence fear
The bite happens in 83
Charlie probably also dies in 83
Elizabeth is probably 85 or 86 depending when circus baby’s open before 87
After the fredbears and the dirst first location closed after the MCI
Where did you get that Five nights at Freddy's jingle at the 0:18 mark? That was fire
It's from a piano cover by Amosdoll Music of the Living Tombstone song 👍
Thanks
The whole elizabeth thing was agreee upon to happen after the MCI after sfton understands remnant, so elizabeth dies somewhere around late 1985 or 1986
Pure Facts
Nice won keep it up
Ok this may have been looked at already but given the mediocre melody all share a child soul respectively what if they were first maybe they were the original mascots and the two golden ones are just for William (bunny) and Henry (Fredbear) because the melody are much older given they require a battery to be attached at all times while the golden ones don’t have this same battery implying they are much newer it’s the only way to Explain the mini games in fnaf 3 like why are there just random victims that everyone has seemed to completely gloss over then after that it’s CC Then Charlie then the main gang, I just have no idea where to put Elizabeth and Jeremy (fnaf 2) also does Jeremy (fnaf 2) and Jeremy (HW1) also count as victims??
Into the pit of full of Easter eggs that aren’t related to canon so the poster is pretty meaningless
Into the pit has so many contradictions on the real McI
The answer "who" ok who is first
Lol
Had to like it for the kid laroi joke. 10/10 no notes