How To Get Arri Alexa Color On Your Panasonic GH5 V-log Footage
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 фев 2025
- How To Get Arri Alexa Color On Your Panasonic GH5 V-log Footage
Want to improve your Portrait Lighting and Retouching?
Learn how here: cb.imageclassr...
---
My Main Video Camera: geni.us/vh7AwI
Best Gimbal Lens: geni.us/3tB7hc
Walk Around Lens: geni.us/OJBf
Favorite Portrait Lens: geni.us/BKbt79
External Monitor For Recording: geni.us/JTKNu
---
Help support the channel, buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoff...
----
Want To Know The 3 Portrait Secrets You Need To Know, To Create Stunning Images? Get The FREE Training Right Here - bit.ly/image-cl...
---
My favourite Raw Photo Editor 30 Day Free Trial:
captureone.sjv...
Software I use for my online business:
www.craigbeckt...
How To Get Arri Alexa Color On Your Panasonic GH5 V-log Footage
In this video you'll discover how to get Arri Alexa colors from your Panasonic GH5 V-log footage. If you want better skin tones and more accurate colors.
Then check out this video where I show you how to apply a lut to your Panasonic Gh5 V-log footage, to transform your GH5 color to the Arri Alexa...
Arri Alexa-GH5 Lut: www.emotivecolo...
Arri Alexa Lut Generator: www.arri.com/c...
My favourite Raw editor 30 Day Free Trial:
captureone.sjv...
Check out the gear I use for Photo and Video:
www.amazon.com...
Adobe Photography Plan: goo.gl/JyHkZD
Subscribe to my RUclips Channel: goo.gl/0AyD4u
Photography Website: imageclassroom...
Photo Blog: shutterslam.co...
Follow Me On The Web...
Facebook: / craigbecktaphotography
Instagram: / craigbeckta
Twitter: / craigbeckta
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As affiliates we get a small percentage of qualifying purchases but rest assured you won't pay a cent more than buying it elsewhere. This helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for your support! I really appreciate it…
Thank you man! 🙏
No problem!
Great work, Can this workflow work for someone who does weddings?
looks great! thanks man
Wait shouldn’t the ordering of those adjustment layers switch? Thought it was applied top down?
Just seeing this now! Love it, you are very informative
Thanks Alex, I will do another one with even more detail soon.
ARRI file came up as a cube.gz file. doesn't seem to work for adobe. here is what it looks like: ARRI_LogC2Video_709_adobe3d_33.cube.gz Any suggestions?
P.S. the rest worked great! Thank you!
FINALLY... somebody that knows how to use GHa properly, and teach it correctly, explaining the right basis to make it work accuratly!
I was about to make a review/tutorial video about it myself, since i was pissed of seeing people using it the wrong way, or ending up with results that don't reflect the true awesomeness off this conversion pack.
Thanks, David. I still have to learn more but when I do, I'll put out a more detailed video.
Great video! Thanks for sharing! Did you try the Panasonic Varicam LUT? Is it good with GH5?
It is ok, not the best LUT out there though.
Great video. Super helpful. Question for you or @alexmack once you've added your adjustment layers and applied all the proper LUTs, would you correct white balance on the main source clip or on the layer that you're adjust exposure/contrast too? Thanks!
You can use either but an adjustment layer means you only need to do it once if all the clips are shot the same.
@@cbphotovideotips Awesome. Thanks for the tip. Great video man, you've got a new subscriber.
Thanks for this great video Craig. What do you think of the Leeming LUT(S)?
Hey Jerry, I think they are the most accurate corrective luts out there.
love this tips thanks alots
Want this with bmpcc4k too plz can make a video on it plzzzz
I don’t own that camera.
Craig, what do you do to minimize noise? I love the colors, but I find that the footage is somewhat grainy when I shoot with the recommended exposure levels and vlog 400iso. Do you make noise reduktion in post?
I don’t do any noise reduction. I find if I expose correctly I don’t really need to.
Ok. I'm following the settings in the dokumentation pdf with skin tones at around 60. Colors are absolutely amazing, but I find that Shadows are pretty grainy. Also, I'm having an issue with banding in the sky if I make bigger adjustments after the initial grade is put on. And that is while shooting 10 bit.
Sooo, is this available in FCPX? Cause I own it, and kind of doesn't work as well. Wish i knew that
Hey Marco, I have a Mac and FCPX now, so I will be writing the documentation for it soon. Here is what I've noted thus far: *In FCPX you will want to use the Custom Lut utility built in, rather than a plug-in to apply GHa. Also, for WB, use the temp/tint controls in the Color Wheels in conjunction with the Vectorscope. Avoid the Basic WB eyedropper (more than just WB). The same basic principles and order of operation in Resolve and Premiere apply to FCPX.
I wonder if there is an equivalent for the Black magic pocket cinema camera 4k
Go to his website and email Alex, the link is in the description.
Hey, why are you applying the GHALEX daylight (LogC) instead of GHALEX daylight?
This is how Alex told me to apply it. It turns your footage into Alexa Log C. Experiment and choose what you like better.
@@cbphotovideotips Alex ''told'' you to simply use the LogC conversion combined with the official Arri 709 LUT?
This is surprising, since Alex created his own versions of the Arri 709 LUT, and it's already combined with the LogC conversion into 1 single LUT.
So you only need to apply the Premiere Pro PRE LUT at the very beginning (if you're using Premiere Pro), then directly apply one of the Rec 709 versions (Main, Soft and Linear).
''Linear'' is simply a nicer version of the regular Arri 709 LUT (i.e. better black level, etc).
''Main'' has a lower highlight ceiling, so it creates smoother, softer skintones, a film-like response with no harsh light.
''Soft'' is really similar to Main, but is useful when you plan to apply a heavy color grade (contrast/saturation levels are a bit lower).
I suggest you always try all different possibilities before settling down on the ''LogC + Arri 709'' method.
From a project to another, certain variations fits better than the other (in context, depending on the desired look at the end).
Sorry for my sloppy English.
I tried all of the options and I preferred the way I demonstrated in the video. But yes, if you are new to the LUT do try all options for yourself.
@@cbphotovideotips That's totally fine. Also try the OLPF (Optical Low-Pass Filter) emulation trick Alex recommends. It helps a lot to remove the oversharp look of the GH5 (especially on hair and fine detail) while retaining edge sharpness. Another step towards the true Alexa look.
@@davidmultimedia2024 Indeed it is so! I've learned that there really are different tastes when it comes to received color, and some do prefer the photometric approach of Arri's R709. Oftentimes, the 'Technicolor' backend of the EC variations is what many expect in conjunction with the Alexa, and many will prefer those
On the C300 M2 using CLog3... generally you keep mid gray at 35-40 units on the scopes. That should work on Vlog as well. I have tried that method on my GH5s and it seems to provide adequate exposure for skin tones. I do like your idea of converting the Vlog footage to Arri log and just plunking in the Arri LUT. To me that makes alot more sense rather than dropping alot of coin on the emotive color LUT. Seems a bit pricey to me.
Nice tutorial, but please ZOOM IN on your screen for smaller menus and buttons.
...or you can just use the colorspace transform in Davinci Resolve, go from v-log to Log-c and save your money.
Resolve CST is great; I use it and its my preferred NLE. That said, the point of EC is to go beyond a whitepaper colorspace transform. To do this, I measured ~27k sample points per camera, and wrote a program in C++ to interpolate between the data sets. www.emotivecolor.com/img/engine.jpg The result is that when shooting under reference sunlight or halogen, the match is not approximate, but exact - www.flickr.com/photos/167269143@N04/albums/72157706039677625
To some this is worth it, and to others its not. And that's ok.