First Principles Explained - How First Principles affect ALL of Us
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
- In this video, we explain what First Principles are and how they affect all of society.
Aristotle describes First Principles as "Known by Nature." When we align our understanding with how the world actually operates, we are closer to First Principles and increase our potential. The growth of Societies and Individuals is highly dependent on acceptance of Correct Principles. First Principles are the foundation of Correct Principles & can also be one and the same.
My Skillshare Classes - www.skillshare...
Whiteboard Animation Software - t2m.io/SeU5fmpw
Video Equipment I Use - kit.co/dreamle...
My Website: dreamletblue.com/
Consider Supporting me on Patreon! - / dreamlet
My First Video About First Principles Reasoning:
• First Principles: Elon...
Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Objective Truths:
• Elon 2015 Spring Convo...
Editing Software I Use (Affiliate Links):
Adobe Creative Suite - t2m.io/R5u9R7uH
Whiteboard Animation Program - t2m.io/SeU5fmpw
Motion Presets - www.misterhors...
Check out My Podcast on:
Anchor: anchor.fm/drea...
Spotify: sptfy.com/4P89
______________________________________
Social Media:
Instagram: / scottyluu
Twitter: / scottyluu
Facebook: / dreamletblue
Music:
Track 1: "Inspiring" by AudioLounge (Standard License Purchased)
Track 2: "Cute" Royalty Free Music from www.bensound.com
#aristotle #firstprinciples #knownbynature
Love the way you think. Don't hesitate to share more of your ideas. Thank you for the current ones!
what a great compliment to give and recieve :)
I hardly leave comments, but keep making videso like this, you'll surpass many others soon. Awesome work done here.
Thank you! I truly appreciate your comment & am very glad to know you enjoyed it!
I actually didn't understand the deduction of statements, wish you had some more examples on 1st Principles to separate them from statements. Thanks!
i thought the same but i guess it is because you can go on to say, 'what are humans?' and 'what is age?' which means it is not a 1st principle because you have to reason up from a 1st principle and not down....? I guess
@@Scoutsourced
An example of a first principle in logic would be the law of non-contradiction: (A) and (not A) cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense.
This is undeniably true, but you can’t deduce it from any observation.
GREAT video!
3:08 That's the question I was struggling from.
You solved it great
As a German Biologist -
In Ancient Times
We called this
LAWS of NATURE
Isaac Newton studied this all his Life
Now we make it political
And a Cult
Praying to the Priest
To do something
And he is unable to…
Iv watched this video a thousand times but I still don't know how to apply it in real life lol
Help us out and discuss about first principles of mental health and security
I like this video the most!
Great work. You deserve more views and subscribers but keep on doing your hardwork.
Great content and quite useful!
I'm trying to apply the 1st Principle to figure out the plausibility of uploading a 2nd set of mind opening videos like this (w/o any particular music playing in the background) that would still get some views/likes ...
You definitely deserve more suscribers
So cool!
good video. this video should be viewed more
Science is objective truth? Can you scientifically prove that statement? Scientism = infinite regression = oxymoron.
I believe the concept of objective truth can't be disconnected from the idea of God.
Commenting for the algorithm
Wow you write so neat.
Hey!, Do you know about nicest books to read?
If I heard you right, you said that truth is science. Can you prove that proposition by the scientific method? No, the proposition that the only certain truth is scientific truth, is self-defeating. The law of non contradiction is true. It cannot be false.
Moral and epistemic realism. Scientism. This is oversimplified and there are fair criticisms but thanks for the great explanation.
You are the ones who should share their ideas and thoughts, like Elon Musk.
What? "Cannot be deduced" then example is how it's deduced...
I guess you mean broken down further into smaller parts...
Its close but natural mind only uses since and modern living doesn't grasp Imagination being creative not science that come afterward. Ecclesiastes 3:15: “That which is, already has been; that which is to be, already has been; and God seeks what has been driven away.” The “natural man” cannot grasp that, for to him reality is based only on the evidence of the senses. The man of reason could justify the verse’s end, saying if it has any meaning then the writer must mean recurrence. The sun comes every day and the moon completes its cycle and the seasons come and go. If we took a picture of the universe today, the scientists can compute how long it will take to return to this point in the picture. So the intellectual man could justify the verse; but that is not what is meant, for it is addressed not to the man of reason or the man of sense, but to the man of Imagination. What is it all about? “That which is, already has been; that which is to be, already has been, and God seeks what has been driven away.”
Our family calls this common sense.
This could go on an infinite loop. You age as not a first principle that doesn't make sense. Because using all humans age could be deduced to: all animals age -> humans are animals -> all humans age. Couldn't you make this argument for all things?
I was excited to see "PNC" but instead it said science .
"If everyone just disappeared then the fundamental forces such as gravity don't just cease to exist"
How do you know this? Our current understanding of gravity comes from testing in the sandbox that our, and others', perceptions allow. How do you know what there is when perception and experience are removed? How can you ever know "true first principles"?
Because we know
Nothing to indicate that the fundamental forces rely upon us looking at them. Just close your eyes and pretend gravity doesnt exist. See what happens.
Know by Nature?
As an Hindu, you explained nothing. Can you challenge me as a Hindu?
Polynani a great physicist, says science is not objective. The scientist uses intuition, makes value judgements in the process and most clearly, she is part of the process. A subjective, human does science. If value judgements, are just personal opinions, relative to the individual or for some her culture. Then, why do things matter to people. Why are rational humans, including brilliant scientists, found upset if someone cuts in front of them in line. Why do issues, that are mere value judgements, opinions, like the guy who takes the last piece of cake without apology, concern us. So, he values his pleasure over the others at the table. Why do people then act as if there is some rule, some rule known by all that says, "Ask first, jerko."
You've made a grave mistake by making science the first principle. Science is not the first principle science is a product of first principles. Therefore, it works within the limits of first principles and can never supersede them.
Would it be better to say that science is the process of discovering and building on first principles?
I thought you were going to say 1st principles, simplicity. Of each particular thing ask: What is it in itself? What is its nature? - Good video, you think clearly, understanding is all about accurate analysis.
Now, great video, first of all. But keep in mind, that "The laws of nature are permanent", is an assumption in of itself. Just because we have never witnessed anything otherwise, doesn't mean it will always hold true. Although, I can't imagine how the world could exist without permanent rules, but then again, who am I?
U SIR ARE AN AMAZING ARTIST !! I APPLAUD YOU'RE SKILL I CAN NOT BELIEVE THESE EYES WHEN U DRAWED A GALAXY WITH A SHARPY RIGHT IN FRONT OF THESE LITTLE EYES OF MINE. I AMN NOT LET THEM SHINE, SUBSCRIPTION EARNED !! !!
Post script !!
Pls sir, do u take commissiioon requeats? I am have a new wiffe that is a genuine sight for these tired and sore eyes. I can send crypto just lamme no !!!!! fam !
With all do respect, I totally disagree with the second part of this video. The argument that we knew nothing and because of science (provisional) we found the right path and we have been on the road to glory ever since is at best insufficient and ineffective, and at worst totally bankrupt. Why else would we tear through our planet like a confused frustrated bull in a china shop? Destroy everything in our vicinity for a moment of peace and sense of being in control which never comes. What is the source of all this restlessness in human race? Could it be false teachings of science or religions or cultures ? Social systems? Why do we think because we have always been the loudest people on the planet we are saying the right things? Why do we think the purpose of human race is all these materialistic advancement we are so proud of? To what price? destroying a planet with over billion years of biological history in 500 years of science and civilization. "This place was a paradise before you monkeys showe up" the mushroom to Terrence Mckenna.
Thanks for teaching first principles thinking and reasoning but these should be used to critic and reject some of old ideas fed to us by science, culture and society as facts. Science has a convergence issue. To find closed exact solutions, scientists need to make assumptions which simplfies the reality. Some of these solutions developed by old monkeys are wrong but unfortunately been used as facts for years to create a false baseline completely detached from the experiences of individuals and personal creativity.
We need to use these principles to find out when and why we lost our way.
Apologies for bad spelling and messy punctuation. 🙏
Reza Vand
PhD in Computional Mechanics.
Maybe you can go even faster.
Anyone who does not know the Creator of the universe, Jesus , is Truth Less and Lost.
Objective Truth is not science.....it's God.
Scientific 'theories' change as time goes on......Objective Truth on the other hand cannot change. Without Jesus you will never see nor enter heaven.
do YOU know him? I doubt it
@@lutzreloaded yes i do, do you?
@potato psoas cause God is the objective Truth, not 'science'.
@potato psoas Well, whats the opposite of Truth? False. So if you don't have the Truth then you are false.....also you wont end up in heaven. Nothing is as important as TRUTH and God is the Truth and without Him you are lost forever and ever.
ruclips.net/video/3gyP_xdMl8E/видео.html
@jparkerwillis There is no reasoning with a person that has strong religious beliefs and a closed off worldview and paradigm of their own reality.
This video based its roots in the Ancient Greek way of thinking about things. That stuff is either true or false. But that isn't how things work in real life and especially in science. So the point is invalid mostly.
Plus, humanity does not have yet all answers and some things just cannot be proven or unproven. On such matters, anyone's guess is as best as anyone's. (For example the gravity thing. As far as we know, we could be just living in a simulation or maybe the world doesn't function as we know it unless there's someone to experience it (many ways of seeing this))
Iv watched this video a thousand times but I still don't know how to apply it in real life lol