Why I use GlusterFS and not a NAS

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июл 2024
  • Introduction to GlusterFS an advanced filesystem for scale up and scale out workloads. How it works, and how I use it in my home lab.
    Support me on Patreon: / djware
    Follow me:
    Twitter @djware55
    Facebook: / don.ware.7758
    Gitlab: gitlab.com/djware27
    "Brightly Fancy" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
    "Militaire Electronic" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
    Werq by Kevin MacLeod
    Link: incompetech.filmmusic.io/song...
    License: filmmusic.io/standard-license
    Industrial Cinematic by Kevin MacLeod
    Link: incompetech.filmmusic.io/song...
    License: filmmusic.io/standard-license
    Music Used in this video
    "NonStop" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
    #scaleout #glusterfs #storage
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 15

  • @peppe540
    @peppe540 2 года назад +1

    Great one DJ, looking forward to the livestream!

  • @The-Other-Mario
    @The-Other-Mario 2 года назад +5

    "If I'm to have a symbol, it shall be one I respect."

  • @KingZero69
    @KingZero69 2 года назад +1

    great video… very cool 😎

  • @Anonymous______________
    @Anonymous______________ Год назад +1

    The only cavet with Glusterfs is performance during any type of file interaction (stat, readdir, readdirp getattr, etc) is horrendously slow due to DHT. Whereas, disturbed file systems like MooseFS or BeeGFS handle file/directory operations much better due to their use of dedicated metadata services. GlusterFS's actual read/write performance is pretty good when you do not use any of the performance translators. For perspective, I manage a 16 node setup scaling up to eight petabytes using distributed-dispersed volumes and it has been rock solid in terms of stability and durability.

  • @abobader
    @abobader 2 года назад +3

    Great subject DJ! Well done, sure easy to go with it, I know you are not considering Ceph, but you was clear for the reason, for me if I will go with scaling, Ceph will be the way, again very well done video.

    • @CyberGizmo
      @CyberGizmo  2 года назад +1

      thanks abobader I am running on arm. It has been awhile since I have tried ceph, but in the past the install usually dies around the part where the osd servers are being set up, I might give it another try. Works fine on x86 hardware though.

    • @abobader
      @abobader 2 года назад

      @@CyberGizmo Thanks DJ, looking to that video in future, well done.

  • @lukeengstrom2712
    @lukeengstrom2712 Год назад +2

    as a data engineer the concept of Clustered storage being the best for home seems like an oximoron when very mature solutions exist like TrueNAS.. with Clustering there are just so many gotchas that are not worth it unless your running a multi-building enterprise.

  • @guilherme5094
    @guilherme5094 2 года назад

    👍!

  • @davidunderwood9037
    @davidunderwood9037 2 года назад +1

    TrueNAS Scale just released version with GlusterFS and it has a GUI!!!

    • @CyberGizmo
      @CyberGizmo  2 года назад +1

      nice, thanks David for the tip

  • @Nimitz_oceo
    @Nimitz_oceo 2 года назад

    Hi Dj, can you make a video explaining the difference between Gluster and Ceph? Redhat offer these services but no video out there explaining the main differences and why would a customer use one vs the other

    • @CyberGizmo
      @CyberGizmo  2 года назад +1

      Sure, Christian, I think I can do, but will have to say I have never had a lot of success trying to run Ceph on ARM, but who knows maybe this time it will work :D

  • @dustycarrier4413
    @dustycarrier4413 Год назад +1

    Gluster seems really great for a larger group environment, but very inappropriate and unwieldly for an individual.