Professor challenged University on Evolution. Find out what happened when he did...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- Professor Rattles University with Evolution DEBATE!
Is evolution the WHOLE story? Professor Coleman sparked a FIRE at University of New York with a groundbreaking lecture questioning the limits of evolutionary theory.
Get ready for a thought-provoking discussion! We dive deep into Dr. Coleman's arguments, analyze the evidence, and explore alternative viewpoints. Is this a scientific breakthrough, or a challenge to the status quo? YOU decide!
***Please comment below-keep it civil too.
Subscribe for the full breakdown! We'll unpack the science, address the controversy, and hear from leading researchers. This is your chance to explore the cutting edge of evolutionary theory!
#evolution #sciencedebate #university #opentodiscussion #knowledgeisevolution
A God who created a universe approximately 93 billion light years long With trillions of galaxies , each one with 100 , 200 or 300 billions stars and He call each one by name , does anyone have any doubts that This God managed to get all these animals inside Noah's ark ? Off course not , put all that animals inside of the ark was the most easy thing for Him .
Exactly. Not an issue for Him.
@@anilkanda611 of course not my friend , was very easy for Him . I do really love your videos ❤️
Not an issue for magic.
@@MrLogo73 Power of God.
What did God do, magically shrink the thousands of "kinds" of animals that would have to have been on the ark. And that doesn't even count the many thousands more that existed but are no [edit] extinct.
Gunter Bechly, PhD a German Paleontologist was forced out of his job as curator of the State Museum of paleontology after 17 years of service, because he disavowed Darwinian evolution.
Sometimes there is a cost for moving to Christ. Bechly paid this price. Christ himself would certainly have understood.
Interestingly, I am not a Christian myself. Not because I reject Christ (which I most certainly do NOT) but because I am unwilling to give up Judaism.
I am a retired surgeon. I hope to have the honor of "symbolically" treating Christ's wounds when and if I am given an opportunity to meet him.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Retired surgeon
I believe you will not see the Father unless you put your trust in Jesus Christ.
He IS the promised Messiah , Jerusalem has been destroyed as predicted in the O.T.
It HAS to be Yeshua.
@@jamesmorgan2064 That stance is characteristic of the Bible and “orthodox Christianity.” However, numerous people have disclosed that during active NDE’s they were allowed to be in his presence.
I realize that some NDE data is not necessarily consonant with Biblical Christianity. There is quite a lot that varies.
Because I love Christ and consider him the most important character in history, I will indeed hope to have the honor of meeting him.
Christ himself was a Jew during every moment of his life. He still is.
Respectfully,
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
@@sanjosemike3137 thank you. Please read the new testament book of Hebrews.
I believe you Will meet Christ. Next will come the judgement
@@jamesmorgan2064 I agree. Many people who have had NDE's talk about their "judgment experience during their life recapitulation. (Although I think you are referring to the "Biblical Judgment." )
But it is still judgment. I am not at all frightened by death, but I am very concerned about my "life review." I know I will be held in judgment for my poor choices and yes, some sins.
I try very hard now to treat everyone, including strangers with love. My words have the power to hurt, so I always reconsider them before I say them.
It is TIME for all of us to kinder to each other, even when we are p****d off!
I know that Christ himself had a temper occasionally. Still, I'm sure he tried to control it.
God bless you.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Thank you brother Anil and coworkers (:
🙋🙋♀️🤝🙏👍
Welcome 👍.
A rather recent film "Darwins Dilemma" shows the absurdity of darwins "species jumping" theory, and shows how the Csmbrian explosion demonstrates that there are no transitional forms and no gradualism required for his theory to be valid .
I want to see this!!!*Don't forget to subscribe for more content! thanks friend!!!!
@annieoaktree6774 "Any creationists here brave enough to answer?"
No, they prefer to believe, that life was poofed into existence by magic. They say it's 'god's power', which is literally magic.
@annieoaktree6774 Hi, that is an interesting point you have put across. Maybe you could clear something up for me. Was there any land type organism present during this time period and how close to the ocean were they found. I have looked and it seems there was only sea life .
The bible interestingly enough says that on day 5 sea creatures were made, this being before land creatures. Could that fit in with precambrian life as the land animals have not been made based on the bible, or would that be a flat out no.
@@MrLogo73 Whether God poofed things into or existence or it says he did it by natural processes over bill of yrs, or this was all purely by natural means without a God we still can only believe it.
You [believe] in the scientist and their origins story, don't you?. You are not able to verify one document that they bring forward. It's a belief system. It could be all true, I can except that, but it's a belief. Be it creation or evolution.
There are many eg of God using natural events to bring about his judgements. eg , sodom and Gomorrah being one,. The evidence is there that supports the story. It is still however a belief. The evidence for or against it, does not change that. It is unverifiable, which makes it a belief.
@annieoaktree6774 "Darwins Dilemma" is a very well made film showing intelligent design as the only possible conclusion to life on Earth. Some dozen or so academics present findings and proofs across three continents demonstrating abrupt appearance of various species and no "species jumping" via gradualization nor transitional forms...they just ARENT THERE. Darwin himself admitted that if the Cambrian explosion held, it would mean special creation, and his "theory" would be invalid . 165+ years since his "book" (bunk), and no supporting findings AT ALL. "Thought to be ancestors" you say...its been calculated that the odds of all this life and systems here happening by random "chance" is greater than the number of atoms in the entire universe . There is no "bad science" in the film . There seems to be, largely, those who accept the science and findings presented, and those who simply avoid it . And on a smaller scale, those who bad mouth it and those who havent bothered to actually watch it but decide to criticize it .
The Flood and the Ark are known in many cultures when studying ancient literature but they are depending on the biblical story about Noah and not vice versa as some say.
Because the biblical story does not use mythos in the flood account.
*Don't forget to subscribe for more content! thanks friend!!!!
And the biblical story depends on myths predating the biblical myth such as the Epic of Gilgamesch, where the supposed flood is ascribed to different gods.
@@MrLogo73this has never been proven. And if you know the details of the true Genesis account of the flood and then the details of other flood myths, like Gilgamesh, you can see the dramatic difference in historical writing and words of legend. Everything that’s historical has the potential to have a legend that resembles it-just like the reality of a World Wide Flood that destroyed everything, laid down the layers of the earth along with its fossils, and showed the destruction of sin by a Holy and Righteous Creator. God promised that he would never again destroy the world by water when he created the rainbow. BUT, Jesus will return one day, and the world will be destroyed by fire instead of a flood. The same exact way it happened in the Genesis account. Scoffers will scoff. Others will repent and believe the Gospel. I pray you do too, for the salvation of your soul. “For the wages of sin is DEATH, but the FREE GIFT of God is ETERNAL LIFE in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Romans 6:23)
Repent of your sins and trust in Christ before the final destruction of fire comes.
Incorrect.
The brain could never survive or evolve without the body
And vice versa
THE END
That’s interesting.
It is true that brains require a blood supply to remain conscious in the way you are now registering consciousness by reading my lines. The atheist materialist concept is that no consciousness can exist without the brain. And that after the brain dies, there is no consciousness. That has been refuted by NDEs. In most cases atheist materialists DISAVOW NDE's, even though they haven't looked at the evidence for it. Susan Blackmore is the most vocal atheist materialist against NDEs. However, she is severely out of date and has not kept up on the latest NDE research.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Retired surgeon
You realize this guy isn't a scientist, right? He's a lawyer and Christian apologetics proponent who has never spent a single day in science classroom or science lab.
Science that has become dogmatic deserves to be challenged. Its very definition is about constant discovery. Most scientific revolutions happened from people outside the accepted fields. Study the history of it.
Then why didn’t any scientists Or you for that matter disprove him and take the $20,000 price? He and several mathematicians scientists etc disproved evolution then why it’s there turn to reprove evolution lol
In which case the scientists should have nothing to fear. All he has asked for is facts and proof.
@@iceman4660Yeah you don't need to be scientist to read scientific paper. I maybe won't understand everything but if there we assume, think and selling some story then it is just an a 'maybe' without any scientific solution.
He knows so much more than you 😂
The water burst forward with the force of a "trillion billion atomic bombs." Just a few thousand atomic bombs would destroy all life on Earth. Imagine what a "trillion billion" would do. Does Coleman have any clue as to what he is talking about?
Yes it would be beyond amazing that 8 people and an wooden boat full animals would survive the force of a "trillion billion" atom bombs.
He's making a point.
No. He's repeating nonsense dreamed up by nutter Walter Brown and his "Hydroplate" claims. Things which violate most of the known laws of physics. Even most other YECs think Brown has a few screws loose.
@@anilkanda611 What do you suppose the point is? Coleman references Walter Brown as his source for this supposed event. I looked him up. He was a a military guy with an education in mechanical engineering. No background in geology or plate tectonics that I found. According to Brown the explosion was equivalent to "10 billion hydrogen bombs". Coleman doesn't explain how he got a "trillion billion atomic bombs" from Brown's 10 billion hydrogen bombs.
So a hydrogen bomb is roughly 1000 times to force of an atomic bomb. That would mean that a "trillion billion" atomic bombs would be equivalent to only a billion billion hydrogen bombs.
So Coleman is only exaggerating Brown's claim by 100 million times.
By way of comparison, the meteor that exterminated the dinosaur and wiped out 3/4 of life on the planet is estimated as the equivalent of 3 billion hydrogen bombs. Using Brown's figure of 10 billion hydrogen bombs, that is the equivalent of 3300 dinosaur exterminating meteors hitting earth at the same time. Coleman's claim would thus be equivalent to 330 trillion such dinosaur exterminating meteors hitting the earth at the same time.
Yeah, it would be amazing that people on a wooden boat would survive. As in amazing way beyond any reasonable belief.
The major also states the thickness of the earth is 60 miles, whereas Brown says it was 10 miles.
So what is the point? Is the point that Coleman feels its OK to wildly exaggerate information to make his story sound more credible? That Coleman isn't smart enough to understand the implications of what he is saying? Or it just that Coleman is sloppy in his research?
Again, whatever the point is, it suggests that Coleman should not be trusted as to the accuracy of his statements.
[Edit:]
After writing this I discovered another video of Brown on his "hydroplate" theory. His early video from 1993 is here:
ruclips.net/video/3jzijddw1qQ/видео.html
There at 0:15 he makes the claim that the waters erupted with a force "exceeding the explosion of 10 billion hydrogen bombs".
His more recent video is here:
ruclips.net/video/sD9ZGt9UA-U/видео.html
AT 0:55 he is now claiming the water eruptions were equivalent to 30 trillion hydrogen bombs! That is a change of over 3000 times in explosive power! That equates to about 10 million dinosaur exterminating meteors hitting the earth at the same time.
Does that sound sensible?
Makes you wonder about the accuracy of his claims when he apparently made a mistake of 3000x the explosive power of the explosion when he made up his theory.
However, it does make Coleman's claims a little less exaggerated. A "trillion billion", or a billion billion hydrogen bombs, is an exaggeration of only 33,000 times more force, which is not as bad as exaggerating it 100 million times.
@@iriemon1796 I mean the time we had was short and he abbreviated his presentations. I think he provides evidences when does his college presentations and does q/a afterwords.
He's pretty reasonable and won't make claims without some basis for it.
@@anilkanda611 I appreciate you had limited time, that doesn't excuse making dubious assertions.
"Prove me wrong". No, you have to produce evidence for your claim and there is non. Making up stories is just not good enough.
What is this guy a professor in. It's not common sense nuts stuff.😮😮😮
So you need evolution to generate the diversity of life today after the kinds that got off the Ark.
If you are referring to change over time, there's no issue with that, Its obvious, and can be tested within limits. If you are referring to macro evolution over millions and millions of years, the answer is no.
Actually speciation is a good term to use. It keeps away from the unscientific term of evolution. Evolution is nothing more then a religious belief system. Things happened you can't see but you believe they happened. The problem arises when you compare the history of the Bible to evolution. There is no proof evolution happened but there is lots of proof names of people and places in the Bible were true. So in reality you have far more proof for the Bible then you do evolution
@@anilkanda611You have no issue with change over time, but you have a problem with changes over long stretches of time? That’s illogical, even self-contradictory!
@@alex-qe8qnchanges within species is self evidentiary.
Changes from ONE type of species (fish) to another (cow)?
Sorry. There is NO plausible scientific evidence that shows any proof this happened.
@@alex-qe8qn
There's no advantage for reproducing.
The females slow down the group, adults share the food with the yougest ones and the babies take nutrients.
No living thing would care about the next generation if survival of the fittest was true.
This is self-contradictory.