I was finna get Pixel, the design is 🔥 but for that price, it needs to perform, not just look good. Ain’t no way Im finna be paying premium money just to get blurry edges, shaky night videos, and slow ass charging. Google gotta step up if they wanna compete 🤦🏼♀️
still wondering how can they achieve thos neat edge detection ..even at those hair strains.. pro editing apps like light room premium still having bad edge detection for blur feature..
I have a theory, so they take the blur on the zoom coz that will give a smooth edge detection, then stitch up the whole background with blur. So what you see on the edge is from the zoom, they cut the subject out, then paste the artificial background blur. Again, theory. Haha!
I actually care more about photography including the dynamic range and low light shots. Those night shots are too extreme and most people will not take photos on pitch black scenarios. But I get the idea of testing the cameras. What about moving subjects? how will they handle those?
@GadgetRevNow Thanks for the reply. I wonder if they can freeze the movement without being blurred. Because my phone can't capture moving people sharply especially indoors unlike my old Pixel, even if the movement is not that fast. but testing long exposure is cool too.
a matter of preference on colors... but the stabilization of vivo at night is impressive... i have not tried a pixel phone... but, enjoying x200 pro now
2:05 did the pixel made her clothes grainy? 2:37 vivo x200 pro has much better edge detection, upper left side hair is wrongly blurred 2:54 no details on pixel 9 pro xl hehe 5:16 a lot of clipping with the pixel 9 pro xl 5:18 far better HDR with x200 pro 10:34 way better selfie video on the x200 pro On the other hand, hands down to pixel 9 pro xl selfie cam during daylight. Nonetheless everything else goes to the x200 pro.
I think Vivo is overrated.Especially when it comes to taking photos or videos of people, Apple, Google and Samsung are overall better than Vivo. Chinese brands just do too much skin beauty mode and make the color too punchy. Vivo and Xiaomi photos are like the high quality version of the Galaxy S21 series which had saturated colors.
It's not true. I have x200 pro and without beautification off, it's very natural and i tookany photos and it came as it is. Don't always believe what you see on RUclips.
@Getquora Really? I have Neo 9S Pro Plus and it has the Vivo filters . Yes, the color is not that bad, but still, I don't feel it is natural. I tried Xiaomi 14 Ultra, and it still is too punchy like a painting. Maybe the X200 Pro has better color science and is realistic, but I want to state that Chinese brands' photos in general still seem like a good painting rather than a photo.
true 💯I tried VIVO x200 (NOT pro) for portraits & video. 1) All portraits by default came out very 'unnatural' (as if someone put a white paint on person's face). I guess 'beauty' mode & toomuch saturation used by default. 2) The video quality was very 'ordinary', not impressed at all. 3) I tried same portraits & videos in SAMSUNG s25. They were not great, but certainly much better than VIVO. 4) I want to buy VIVO x200 pro, but with this experience (especially Portraits), I started doubting VIVO capability.
The Vivo isn't really completely superior to the Pixel by 2-3 notches, but it's overall better than the Pixel in photo-video (especially video 📹) which is supposed to be the Pixel's great strength, honestly, it's even harder today to justify the price of the Pixel 9 Pro XL today.
Every phone he had Vivo compared with all of them are more accurate in his opinion. "The iPhone is more accurate, Pixel more accurate, Samsung's looks more natural...etc" I wonder if he is color blind
When I compare both phones, regardless of what I know about other brands, I will only compare and explain which phone is closer in real life inside those two phones. No one wants to hear Apple while I compare Samsung or Pixel, people click because they need answers specifically on those two phones. This comes with years and years of experience. Here's your unspoken suggestion... "Oh, I'm comparing Pixel and Vivo right now but in terms of colors, Samsung is closer and iPhone is the closest in real-life." No one clicked this video wanting to know about Sammy and Apple.
I've always loved Google but come on, the skin tones are still terribly inaccurate and the portrait mode is not even close to its pairs in terms of edge detection and blur intensity ( it's very intense) first if of all Google has to get rid of the Samsung sensor they've been using for 4 years now, even the older sony sensor on the pixel 7a and 8a produces a better portrait shots and more accurate skin tune in my opinion.
Maybe they can also consider Qualcomm? Not sure if Tensor is up to the task. Cant even do a raw 8K readout, Pixel 9 Pro XL is faking an 8K cloud upscalling. Turning an FHD or 4K into 8K, something like that.
they are pretty even...it cames down to price only in your country...i can get a pixel 9 pro with the same ram and storage for 1000 euros...i can get the vivo from shenzen for 200 less...for me vivo is the winer at least for now...
If u are using flagship chinese phone from past year or two, and want to upgrade, I wouldnt even recommend the pixel. Its overall downgrade quality of life, and definitly affecting my daily use. Just got Pixel 8 Pro recently to switch from my Xiaomi 12 Pro(Xiaomi's flagship from 2022) after I use it past 2years. Pixel has slightly worst battery life, even tho pixel8pro is 5050mah and x12pro only 4600mah. Gaming performance is a joke, in pixel u cant get consistent 60fps, and fps drop alot in moba game(in my case its LoL Wild rift) and fps games, which is not that hard to run compared to genshin. My X12pro can run it smootly even tho it have less antutu score (1.020.000 vs 1.130.000). Idk how is it but i think pixel has worse memory management as well, if I browse my gallery and fast scroll down far enough, the pixel takes way longer time to load the photo preview, like it load all the upper photo first before previewing the older photo, the same thing happen if u want to post older photo and scroll from IG as well. It was never a problem from my previous phone, it load in second to almost none loading time. Getting used to charge my phone with 120w charger and fully charge within less than 15minutes, versus 1hour in pixel is quite bothering me that I need to change my charge habits before bedtime or long trip. The reverse wireless charging on pixel also cant charge my TWS (Huawei Freebuds 4) for some reason and its hard to charge the phone wirelessly in my car with phone chase attached, and charge slower too, which was never problem in my previous phone. The only aspect I find it better are the camera and AI feature. The selfie cam are crips clear!, the lowlight quality is awesome as well.
Well the only reason I got it is because I got a good deal on the pixel in 2nd hand market, and I never own any pixel device before, so I try to gave it a shot since I hear so many good things about it.
Nah i already got it. That guy is def hater of vivo. I have x200 pro and it's natural with zeiss natural mode. I have tested against my S23ultra and iphone 15 pro max. It's very natural and has better quality than all. Idk why these RUclipsrs show vivo bad like this guy. For me it's clear what vivo's capability of taking photos and videos. And i have already tested against Samsung and iphone. so I don't believe what he here shows up vivo bad.
hello sir , I am from India, I definitely like your videos and I also like you very much and I have been following you for a long time, will you please gift me a s23 plus phone, your brother 🙏
Haz vídeos reales y no que te pague pixel. Vas a decir en el vídeo de la matricula del coche a 20x que el pixel es mejor. Cuando no hay a dia de hoy mejor zoom que Vivo. Una pena engañar así a la gente.
@GadgetRevNow Well realistically no body sees a portrait shot and make emphasis on edge detection, all people care about is how good the subject turned out to be. And let's not even pretend the edge detection is even noticeable without being nit picky 🥲
I hear yah! I want Google to change the style of portrait mode so I am really stubborn about this. I want Pixel phone to be great in Portrait Mode. If I continuously call them out, maybe someone from the Pixel team will hear this.
@@GadgetRevNow But pixel are already best for portrait photos overall, because it's only with pixel that i can take those jaw dropping photos that make people doubt of it was taken with a phone. The quality scares people and no one ever complained to me about the edge detection so... And you don't necessarily need a pixel 9,8 or even 7 to that to people. Pixel 3, 4 and 5 too look super good
I feel that he has not been entirely honest with the comparison, he has put the photos and videos that most favor Vivo. I have seen other comparisons where the Pixel is better, obviously not in a portrait mode, by edge detection, because in color the Pixel is much better, it is of no use to me that it makes the perfect cut and then you look like a vampire. It has not used video boost either, where the processing is given to you by Google and you don't have to do anything in post-editing, and the Pixel is much better too. And as for the selfie, it has not shown the real potential of the Pixel. The fact that I started the comparison with portrait mode, where I know that the Vivo's crop is superior, gives me a clear idea of the true intention of the video.
If Pixel is better, did I not call that in favor of Pixel? A lot of Pixel fans are really screaming on the comment section. Arguements are so silly. If I dont call out Google on Portrait mode and other stuff, they will not change. P.S. I'm not trashing the phone, I'm calling out the brand to improve on certain aspects. There's a difference.
Can you try Xperia 1Ⅵ? I think that is the most color accurate one. Pixel phones are overall nice, but they tend to have a cooler tone and sometimes the sky is just too blue.
I love the pixel 9 overall. I just seen someone who said the pixel video isn’t good enough to film stuff. It looked pretty solid here
I felt Pixel 9 Pro XL did a marvelous job! Love the quality and clean audio (speech enhancement). Not a fan of 5X but ultrawide and main are solid.
Absolutely insane, it looks awful compared to Vivo, it makes human subjects look like they just swallowed ink, why is the contrast so bad
I was finna get Pixel, the design is 🔥 but for that price, it needs to perform, not just look good. Ain’t no way Im finna be paying premium money just to get blurry edges, shaky night videos, and slow ass charging. Google gotta step up if they wanna compete 🤦🏼♀️
Vivo is the clear winner and the edge detection of the pixel 9 pro xl is terrible.
Better edge detection for sure! ❤️👌
still wondering how can they achieve thos neat edge detection ..even at those hair strains.. pro editing apps like light room premium still having bad edge detection for blur feature..
maybe, it just overdo the actual bokeh effect... even without portrait mode, there is an obvious bokeh effect on close up...
I have a theory, so they take the blur on the zoom coz that will give a smooth edge detection, then stitch up the whole background with blur. So what you see on the edge is from the zoom, they cut the subject out, then paste the artificial background blur.
Again, theory. Haha!
@@GadgetRevNow if that so, the portrait mode on the main and wide camera should be less accurate compare to tele..is that right?
X200 Pro a clear winner 🏆
I did call this out on my Verdict 🤜🤛
Imagine what massive improvements would be for Google pixel 10. Cant wait!
That is 🔥
Pixel is better ❤
❤️❤️❤️
Portraits had never been strongest point of pixel. Pixel should allow telephoto lens for portraits.
Agree 💯
I have been waiting for thissss 😊
Hope you liked it! 😊
I wish I had the Colors of the pixel 9 and the bokeh of the Vivo x200.
Ooooooh that's perfect!
Chose Pixel 👍😎🎉
❤️❤️❤️
Color rendition is better on pixel. Vivo is a bit brighter but looks unreal
Agree 💯
Great review, a lot people can't swallow the pill that vivo is just too good for this camera smartphone era.
I got backlash too over this comparison lol
Bro how about vivo x200 pro or iqoo 13
Galing mo kabayan. Saan ang location nyo sa canada for this video?
Are you from Canada too?
Are these Vivo shots in Zeiss natural mode or vivid? Because vivid will give you a brighter color tone.
I shot all of them on Zeiss Natural.
I'll take the pixel because it's a better looking phone
It does, also the flat screen is safer in my opinion. 😉👍
I liked the Pixel the most with more natural colours
❤️❤️❤️
The transition between all the camera’s vivo is better.
Agree 💯
Pixel far better
Too much unusual colours from Vivo
Vivo won imo. But I’m keeping my pixel 9 pro 🤷🏻♂️
Best of both worlds! Yeah!!!
Are u using origin os or funtouch os on vivo?
Origin OS
Pixel: Natural
Vivo: Saturated
Vivo x200 pro is photography king. After software update it will improve in video too
👍👍👍
I actually care more about photography including the dynamic range and low light shots. Those night shots are too extreme and most people will not take photos on pitch black scenarios. But I get the idea of testing the cameras. What about moving subjects? how will they handle those?
Hmmmm, I did it before. Maybe I should continue testing them too. Like the long exposure blur?
@GadgetRevNow Thanks for the reply. I wonder if they can freeze the movement without being blurred. Because my phone can't capture moving people sharply especially indoors unlike my old Pixel, even if the movement is not that fast. but testing long exposure is cool too.
a matter of preference on colors... but the stabilization of vivo at night is impressive... i have not tried a pixel phone... but, enjoying x200 pro now
Agree, once we go zoom. I didnt notice that on the phone screen, just when I exported the files and reviewed them 👍👍
2:05 did the pixel made her clothes grainy?
2:37 vivo x200 pro has much better edge detection, upper left side hair is wrongly blurred
2:54 no details on pixel 9 pro xl hehe
5:16 a lot of clipping with the pixel 9 pro xl
5:18 far better HDR with x200 pro
10:34 way better selfie video on the x200 pro
On the other hand, hands down to pixel 9 pro xl selfie cam during daylight. Nonetheless everything else goes to the x200 pro.
Thanks for sharing ❤️
Always pixel 😊
Can’t argue with that! 👍
I think Vivo is overrated.Especially when it comes to taking photos or videos of people, Apple, Google and Samsung are overall better than Vivo. Chinese brands just do too much skin beauty mode and make the color too punchy.
Vivo and Xiaomi photos are like the high quality version of the Galaxy S21 series which had saturated colors.
Agree! I think the big 3 are very reliable. ❤️👍
It's not true. I have x200 pro and without beautification off, it's very natural and i tookany photos and it came as it is. Don't always believe what you see on RUclips.
@Getquora Really? I have Neo 9S Pro Plus and it has the Vivo filters . Yes, the color is not that bad, but still, I don't feel it is natural. I tried Xiaomi 14 Ultra, and it still is too punchy like a painting. Maybe the X200 Pro has better color science and is realistic, but I want to state that Chinese brands' photos in general still seem like a good painting rather than a photo.
true 💯I tried VIVO x200 (NOT pro) for portraits & video.
1) All portraits by default came out very 'unnatural' (as if someone put a white paint on person's face). I guess 'beauty' mode & toomuch saturation used by default.
2) The video quality was very 'ordinary', not impressed at all.
3) I tried same portraits & videos in SAMSUNG s25. They were not great, but certainly much better than VIVO.
4) I want to buy VIVO x200 pro, but with this experience (especially Portraits), I started doubting VIVO capability.
I am looking for 24 fe vs iphone 13 camera comparison
pls compare Huawei pura 70 ultra vs vivo x200 pro camera 💥💥
Vivo zoom n portrait best on the otherhand pixel is the best camera
Agree 💯
@GadgetRevNow ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Pixel detail video ,.best..❤
You got it! ❤️
Pixel is better 🎉
❤️❤️❤️
What’s your main phone
Right now, Galaxy S24 Ultra.
i really glad choose vivo x200 pro mini over pixel9pro
❤️❤️❤️
Vivo way better and more versatile in camera and the macro mode will kill Pixel for good..
3.7x macro is so good!
pixel looks better
Vivo is miles ahead of pixel in terms of camera 🔥🔥
Joke😅
@devangT how so?
yes
It really isn't miles ahead. In some scenarios it is ahead, in some it isn't.
Lol
vs oppo find X8 pro pleasee...
Yes it is Google pixel 9 pro xl has 8k video 4:29 it has 8k video
So does Vivo.
Vivo = Real 8K sensor readout
Pixel = 8K cloud upscaling
I will definitely talk about this upscaled 8K. Don't worry. I will make tons of Pixel videos.
Which device has longer battery life?
Pixel 9 has one of the longest battery life, Pixel 9 Pro XL is up there too!
Front camera of vivo is suck😂😂😂😂vote for pixel
❤️❤️❤️
The Vivo isn't really completely superior to the Pixel by 2-3 notches, but it's overall better than the Pixel in photo-video (especially video 📹) which is supposed to be the Pixel's great strength, honestly, it's even harder today to justify the price of the Pixel 9 Pro XL today.
Pixel is true to life
Agree 💯
Wife as thumbnail🤭
She always gets the massive clicks! Kiddin! Sometimes, I switch it up, I made 8 consecutive comparisons with my face, I told wife... "your turn!" 👌
Google need to update hardware for pixel 10... CPU and camera sensor are too old.
Agree 💯
Every phone he had Vivo compared with all of them are more accurate in his opinion. "The iPhone is more accurate, Pixel more accurate, Samsung's looks more natural...etc" I wonder if he is color blind
When I compare both phones, regardless of what I know about other brands, I will only compare and explain which phone is closer in real life inside those two phones. No one wants to hear Apple while I compare Samsung or Pixel, people click because they need answers specifically on those two phones. This comes with years and years of experience.
Here's your unspoken suggestion... "Oh, I'm comparing Pixel and Vivo right now but in terms of colors, Samsung is closer and iPhone is the closest in real-life."
No one clicked this video wanting to know about Sammy and Apple.
pixel is better
Hdr on pixel look garbage.
The skin tone accuracy is so bad on the Vivo 😭
Agree 💯
I've always loved Google but come on, the skin tones are still terribly inaccurate and the portrait mode is not even close to its pairs in terms of edge detection and blur intensity ( it's very intense) first if of all Google has to get rid of the Samsung sensor they've been using for 4 years now, even the older sony sensor on the pixel 7a and 8a produces a better portrait shots and more accurate skin tune in my opinion.
Maybe they can also consider Qualcomm? Not sure if Tensor is up to the task. Cant even do a raw 8K readout, Pixel 9 Pro XL is faking an 8K cloud upscalling. Turning an FHD or 4K into 8K, something like that.
@GadgetRevNow yes. I even the pictures coming from pixel 5 has better skin tones
pixel camera is really outdated
Well, on the portrait. Everything else I think is great.
I will upgtade to pixel 9 pro.
Enjoy ❤️❤️
X200 is better not even close
😱😱😱
they are pretty even...it cames down to price only in your country...i can get a pixel 9 pro with the same ram and storage for 1000 euros...i can get the vivo from shenzen for 200 less...for me vivo is the winer at least for now...
Pixels is the best photo phone🎉❤
They are ❤️
Only portrait is better other than that nothing if samsung apple google uses these oversized sensor then whole china tech industry will finish
👍👍👍
If u are using flagship chinese phone from past year or two, and want to upgrade, I wouldnt even recommend the pixel. Its overall downgrade quality of life, and definitly affecting my daily use. Just got Pixel 8 Pro recently to switch from my Xiaomi 12 Pro(Xiaomi's flagship from 2022) after I use it past 2years. Pixel has slightly worst battery life, even tho pixel8pro is 5050mah and x12pro only 4600mah. Gaming performance is a joke, in pixel u cant get consistent 60fps, and fps drop alot in moba game(in my case its LoL Wild rift) and fps games, which is not that hard to run compared to genshin. My X12pro can run it smootly even tho it have less antutu score (1.020.000 vs 1.130.000). Idk how is it but i think pixel has worse memory management as well, if I browse my gallery and fast scroll down far enough, the pixel takes way longer time to load the photo preview, like it load all the upper photo first before previewing the older photo, the same thing happen if u want to post older photo and scroll from IG as well. It was never a problem from my previous phone, it load in second to almost none loading time. Getting used to charge my phone with 120w charger and fully charge within less than 15minutes, versus 1hour in pixel is quite bothering me that I need to change my charge habits before bedtime or long trip. The reverse wireless charging on pixel also cant charge my TWS (Huawei Freebuds 4) for some reason and its hard to charge the phone wirelessly in my car with phone chase attached, and charge slower too, which was never problem in my previous phone. The only aspect I find it better are the camera and AI feature. The selfie cam are crips clear!, the lowlight quality is awesome as well.
Well the only reason I got it is because I got a good deal on the pixel in 2nd hand market, and I never own any pixel device before, so I try to gave it a shot since I hear so many good things about it.
Thanks for sharing your experience!
Pixel is destroyed when put in compare with Vivo
👍👍👍
there's monsters missing
xiaomi flagship
oppo find
Is it possible to turn beautifilter 100% OFF on Vivo or not?
I think Global version can.
Nah i already got it. That guy is def hater of vivo. I have x200 pro and it's natural with zeiss natural mode. I have tested against my S23ultra and iphone 15 pro max. It's very natural and has better quality than all. Idk why these RUclipsrs show vivo bad like this guy. For me it's clear what vivo's capability of taking photos and videos. And i have already tested against Samsung and iphone. so I don't believe what he here shows up vivo bad.
@Getquora x100 is better due to a better and bigger sensor. But as a photographer I wouldn't say vivo x200 is natural even with natural mode.
Pixel 9 pro xl has done excellent. Surprisingly holds up
❤️❤️❤️
hello sir ,
I am from India, I definitely like your videos and I also like you very much and I have been following you for a long time, will you please gift me a s23 plus phone, your brother 🙏
Bro learn much about pixel phones because pixel 9 pro has 8k video recording with cloud processing
Marketing. Not sure if that cloud-based upscalling warrants a review. Google should do it natively. 8K but not real.
@GadgetRevNow So you were to be ask that,does the pixel 9 pro capable of taking 8k videos what will be your answer?
Not taking or shooting, but manipulating a certain resolution to 8K. I will not say "Yes", but I will answer, "Sure!"
Is that hard to accept vivo has the best camera lately in the industry.?! By reading his replies to comments i guess he is using pixel.he is too bias
It's called preference. Some people don't like heavily beautified pics.
@CZP-01 then why compared it with another phone.
Relax, everyone got their opinion tho..buy what pleasing to you
I'm using S25 Ultra 🫶
É vergonhoso vivo não ter estabilização descente na câmera frontal
Agree 💯
Haz vídeos reales y no que te pague pixel. Vas a decir en el vídeo de la matricula del coche a 20x que el pixel es mejor. Cuando no hay a dia de hoy mejor zoom que Vivo. Una pena engañar así a la gente.
I did comment that Pixel oversharpens the 20x. Didn't I?
All i see is better shots from pixel lol
Just my ick on portrait's edge detection and FHD video blur but all is well! ♥️
@GadgetRevNow Well realistically no body sees a portrait shot and make emphasis on edge detection, all people care about is how good the subject turned out to be. And let's not even pretend the edge detection is even noticeable without being nit picky 🥲
I hear yah! I want Google to change the style of portrait mode so I am really stubborn about this. I want Pixel phone to be great in Portrait Mode. If I continuously call them out, maybe someone from the Pixel team will hear this.
@@GadgetRevNow But pixel are already best for portrait photos overall, because it's only with pixel that i can take those jaw dropping photos that make people doubt of it was taken with a phone. The quality scares people and no one ever complained to me about the edge detection so... And you don't necessarily need a pixel 9,8 or even 7 to that to people. Pixel 3, 4 and 5 too look super good
Hello brother can you help me give galaxy s24 fe phone gift for me please. I am long time follow your yt account. I am not afford smart phone.
If you beg one more time you will be removed from RUclips.
I feel that he has not been entirely honest with the comparison, he has put the photos and videos that most favor Vivo. I have seen other comparisons where the Pixel is better, obviously not in a portrait mode, by edge detection, because in color the Pixel is much better, it is of no use to me that it makes the perfect cut and then you look like a vampire. It has not used video boost either, where the processing is given to you by Google and you don't have to do anything in post-editing, and the Pixel is much better too. And as for the selfie, it has not shown the real potential of the Pixel. The fact that I started the comparison with portrait mode, where I know that the Vivo's crop is superior, gives me a clear idea of the true intention of the video.
If Pixel is better, did I not call that in favor of Pixel? A lot of Pixel fans are really screaming on the comment section. Arguements are so silly. If I dont call out Google on Portrait mode and other stuff, they will not change.
P.S. I'm not trashing the phone, I'm calling out the brand to improve on certain aspects. There's a difference.
Vivo waste
😱😱😱
Pixel sucks 😅
😱😱😱
Its fake😂😂😂 pixel win ...use your mind...
😱
Can you try Xperia 1Ⅵ?
I think that is the most color accurate one.
Pixel phones are overall nice, but they tend to have a cooler tone and sometimes the sky is just too blue.