Understanding plasticity theory (for Mises UMAT)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @pablocb3529
    @pablocb3529 Год назад +2

    Congratulations for your video. Very well explained. It is difficult to find so good and professional plasticity explanations in internet. I’ve found out that the p-q diagram is very useful to visualize pressure dependency and to progress to Drucker-Prager models for example with tension-compression asymmetries.We are using more and more pressure dependent plastic models for metals in car crash finite element simulations. We need pressure dependent models to build up accurate fracture models.

  • @DineshKumar-bz1lg
    @DineshKumar-bz1lg 11 месяцев назад

    Good Explanation. Appreciate the efforts to explain so nicely.

  • @linghaokong4396
    @linghaokong4396 24 дня назад

    thanks a lot for the vedio! But in 13:08, it should be subtract sign in stead of add sign in the maternal

  • @vignarajahkm4462
    @vignarajahkm4462 Год назад

    good one

  • @shahbazshzzi
    @shahbazshzzi 2 года назад

    Good explanation

  • @hamedrahmatavar4397
    @hamedrahmatavar4397 11 месяцев назад

    great great

  • @Jehosafath
    @Jehosafath 2 года назад

    excellent

  • @selvamraj11
    @selvamraj11 Год назад +1

    @ 7.21 Why we are calculating the effective plastic strain rate tensor instead of effective plastic strain?

    • @engineering_software
      @engineering_software  Год назад

      plastic deformation depends on loading history therefore the problem is solved incrementally.

  • @albinbenny2384
    @albinbenny2384 Год назад

    Thankyou

  • @arash4232
    @arash4232 5 месяцев назад

    Hi, the equation of the linear hardening (time 2:44) does not match with the figure; the intercept of the line is less than sigma y.

    • @engineering_software
      @engineering_software  5 месяцев назад +1

      Please note that in the formula plastic strain is used while in the curve horizontal axis shows total strain.

  • @hoseinabedi3448
    @hoseinabedi3448 Год назад

    👍

  • @azz650
    @azz650 5 месяцев назад

    in 11:28 , when calculating the normal (n), why did we divide by 2*sqrt(3/2 sigma':sigma') ?

    • @engineering_software
      @engineering_software  5 месяцев назад +1

      Please note that we are making a derivation from sigma-e, which its definition contains square root.

    • @azz650
      @azz650 5 месяцев назад

      @@engineering_software oh yes, thank you so much :)

  • @selvamraj11
    @selvamraj11 Год назад

    Excellent Video I understand the concept of effective stress for various cases. how do you write effective stress equal to Sqrt(2/3 sigma':sigma'), any derivation is available?

    • @engineering_software
      @engineering_software  Год назад

      2/3 can be found by this fact:
      In simple tension effective stress is equal to applied stress.

    • @selvamraj11
      @selvamraj11 Год назад

      @@engineering_software Thank you very much, This is my long-time doubt, it is clear Now. Still, I am wondering how they introduce the factor!