Considering how RTX 4090 doesn't do that much better on 4K...yes I'm happy with my 3060 to that I got at MSRP during the height of the crisis. 3060 ti gang!
@@cryptex94 Probably not in newset games but in olders like Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition 3060ti can handle RT on ultra without DLSS in 1080p and Cyberpunk 2077 with quality DLSS in 1080p. I plan to test Control soon but so far its impressive i think for mid tier GPU besides RT is just cherry on top not something that will change game much.
My man literally tested my GPU with Hogwarts Legacy after I wondered about it's performance yesterday! Thanks a lot! I am still not going to buy that game so close too launch though. Buying Cyberpunk on launch day taught me a valuable lesson lol 😂
@@luislack7655 I dunno wtf u guys on about, I've played CP at launch on a 3060ti and it was flawless, ultra + rt ultra + dlss balanced worked like a charm.
@@spectraleggings I don't know why people only talk about gpu only,when in the games now cpu just as important.Thats why I have no problem at all. (R7 5800x3d/rtx 3080ti/32gb ram/m2ssd) I'm getting 120-200fps all on ultra 1440p.
@@netsoldier363 yea I was getting happy when I saw the framerates for 4k with dlss then I realized his CPU eats mine alive... Still I hope for the best, I will play in march.
@@gramazdil I would consider that more like a 4k gaming gpu even though Nvidia says it's made for 1440p gaming because of the cost and dlss. Also it wasn't released when I purchased my rtx 3060 ti
@Ellie m might be a cpu bottleneck. I new it's pretty new but it might bottleneck it in rdr2? I have a i7 6700k. It's old but I can get 60+ in rdr2. You also might play on to high settings in rdr2? You maybe run out of VRAM. I get like 120 fps plus in GTA V with almost maxed out settings with 4 times MMSA or what it's called. So it's nothing wrong with the graphic card hun. Your graphics card might be broken?
@@atnfn you can probly get away with 1440p so I bet the CPU won't hold you back too much. I think it's a good sign that Kryzzp was getting held up by trying to play the game so IDK - not my bag but I do hope it's good.
b550m, 5800x, 32gb 3200 ram, 1tb gen4 nvme, 3060ti. I play this game on my 27" 1080x60 monitor. All ultra settings with just RT settings off. I keep a constant 60FPS all the time. I played in TAA for many hours, but did change to DLAA & DLSS quality just to test it. Since I am capped at 60 fps, I don't see an FPS difference. But, I do think DLAA & DLSS quality look better.
The instability might because the games not actually out yet officially. The day 1 GPU drivers will be on the 10th of February I think, hopefully that resolves some of these issues. *EDIT* No official drivers have been launced. :(
Quick update, atleast for me it feels like the game is running much better now for me on my 3060ti then it did a few days ago. Assuming something improved over the past few days. Just got done playing a quick hour session on high settings with like two things on medium and it managed to maintain constant 70-75 fps for me ( i have it capped since im on a 75hz monitor). It only tends to dip into the low 60's during certain areas where the game considers demanding i suppose, like a couple areas at hogwarts castle. But the vast majority of the time, its running well enough past 60, up into the 90-100's uncapped, no constant huge stutters anymore ( the notorious 20 fps drop aswell), all gone it seems.. Im playing on a 16gb system with a 3600 if that helps. Had the most fun just now flying around and seeing how well good the world looks surrounding the castle. Honestly, despite the minor issues with fps/optimization and whatnot, im enjoying the game immensely and would say some of the early criticism were overblown. This game was definitely worth the price.
I've seen a lot of people complain that there is a memory leak. People have seen it go over 32GB and it just slowly creeps up there. So, they might have a problem, rather than it being RAM intensive.
It’s not a memory leak. Ps5 has ridiculous ssd to vram bandwidth that pcs just can’t match. Only way is to cache in ram. TLOU, Returnal, Hogwarts all have exactly the same issue: Vram load spikes that amd has not.
@@teahousereloaded That "could" explain it, but if that is what's going on... it's still a dev issue, not a hardware one. PCs can absolutely match, and even beat, the consoles at this point because they have Direct Storage, and PCs have the ability to use Gen5 SSDs so they can be even faster than the consoles can. If they decided not to include that in their game for the PC and it causes these issues, it's still a problem with the game... not the hardware, because PCs are absolutely capable of the same, or faster, SSD to VRAM bandwidth as the consoles.
The game looks BEAUTIFUL at MEDIUM settings (Native resolution). This really surprised me! It also seems to have few bugs, nothing like Forspoken... Kryzzp, thank you for testing this game at so many different resolutions, settings and DLSS and the 3060 Ti is a great card
If anyone's wondering about Rx 6750xt, you can run the game on ultra setting without RT, 1440p for Above 90fps in interior and outside it stays around 60 with intense scenes dropping it around 54fps. Process: i5 12400f Ram: 16gb
@@MrJavi94 yes I got home today and found that playing with ultra and fsr 2.0 is best of both world, I get around 87fps outside without much visual difference. And I was surprised that my games end up using only 10-11gb ram for some reason idk why. Even when fsr was off.
Really not bad for launch, I expect that after a few patches we'll see a way smoother experience. In the mean time I can definitely live with 65-70 avg at 1440p high .
In another benchmark I saw this game easily taking 18 Gb of RAM in 1080p Ultra with no RT. So yeah, I suppose it's either game is badly optimized or the age of 16 Gb RAM is over. Sad, because that's how much RAM I have
@@maksymokolot4648 no the optimization is pretty good actually, if you experience major stutter that's most likely denuvo doing, even the ryzen 5 5600g can run this at 900p with fsr balance at 30fps, pretty mind-blowing
You should test more in castle, because sometimes I got huge stutters and frames from 100 to 20 for like about 10 seconds and it's not because of loading textures.
Kudos to you for covering this game, even with great production quality! The way you delivered information was fast and precise, your settings used actually made sense (compared to the 60000 articles out there reviewing the performance with Ultra settings + RT on), and having timestamps was a nice touch. After seeing Digital Foundry chickening out of covering this game due to outcries from Twitter nobodies, I think this could be a great time for you to boost this channel's popularity even further. Keep up the good work!
quick tip, You can swap between day and night by opening the map and pressing R3 (on controller) - the exact button to press on PC will be at the bottom right
I’m playing on an RTX 3070 on high with no ray tracing and sometimes the game drops to 30fps and it crashed like 2 times. The game is fun and amazing when it doesn’t crash, but I hope the developers will patch the game with an update later. I don’t know how al they are going to make this thing run on switch though
Awesome video man, I'd love to see a video at some point where you show how to set up your On Screen Display. Like how to get the different colours for GPU, CPU and how to get the gaps between them and also the frametime graph, I really like the way it looks. Anyway, great video man, love the content!
Thanks this has definitely reassured me that it’s definitely my Ram at this point and not my VRAM and once the game’s optimized it’ll be even more enjoyable
Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk o jogo é extremamente pesado, e nem gráficos muitos bonitos ele tem, a placa precisa de dlss pra rodar em FULLHD e no alto e ainda caí abaixo dos 60 fps, stutterings em todos os lados. Queria saber em mundo vcs vivem
@@capetamenino Ele tem graficos bonitos sim? Roda melhor que muitos jogos que sairam recentemente kkk, tem um problema de stuttering (e o mais calmo que vi recentemente também)
I remember when the min spec was once said to be a 1070 until they changed it to a 960, I wonder what both would be like performance wise on this game. 🤔
GTX 1060 is getting decent performance on 1080p medium, so 1070 would get significantly better. For 960, I haven't seen benchmarks but I guess the 2Gb version is struggling hard
This game looks great, I assume by the time full release comes out it would have a fullscreen mode. Seems a bit weird that its not there but it doesnt stop this game from looking stunning
I don't normally like blaming bad optimization if it is unclear as to why a game performs worse than expected or a bit more intensive than usual but the gpu usage was dropping regularly below 98% regardless of settings even if only by a few points and cpu usage was never very high, this is a clear indication of bad optimization.
I’m so glad this game isn’t broken/unoptimised as some may have been fearing, especially after the whole “Foresbroken” situation. Glad to hear no “Hogwarts LAGecy” from Kryzzps :)
@@ryanspencer6778 i play 1080p ultra on rx6600xt, it run fine thoo, just stutter a bit because i install my game on HDD And cutscene sometime it drop so nothing special, the game look better than expected, even a gtx 1650 can play this game well
I tried my 3070 today with the game with rtx on medium and everything high and experienced huge drops from 90 to 20 fps. I'm curious if you're going to have similar issues. I was on quality DLSS
I got a 3060ti and installing the game as we speak ... but wanted to watch your vid first hehe. The 1030 vid was horrifying with those textures and Jack lol.
of course it will, otherwise there would be no need to upgrade for people. My brother just sold his less then one year old 3080 for 570€ and bought himself 4080 for 1100€ people are insane I'm ok with my 3060ti strix and a770le for years to come. Not everyone needs to play the newest AAA titles at 4k. After all the game is the same shit anyway
G'day Kryzzp & Digimoon, Yeah I agree this game does look so much better than ForsBROKEN! While some of the Textures are a bit lacking the Shadows are Amazing, it will be interesting to see how Textures react with 12GB-16GB VRAM. Also when Harry is moving there is Fluidity rather than the Right foot down/Left foot down clunkiness of the Character in ForBROKEN! Ps it will be interesting to see how GPUs with 4GB-6GB VRAM like the RX570/580 & GTX1060 do in this one.
The ram usage seems to be rather erratic. Sometimes it’s using 10ish and other times it’s using more than 25gb. (In the same areas). I’m disappointed in the performance thus far. A lot of stuttering, extremely low dips in nearly single digit fps that require a restart to fix. Fps dips in the beginning of cutscenes with a lot of npc’s around. I’m confident patches will come out to resolve these eventually. But sadly it’s just another case of a poorly optimized pc title/port. Whether it’s a lack of testing or strict release date windows it still blows my mind studios release games in this kind of state. Though at the very least, it’s not as bad as some other titles we have seen in the past….
Ох парень, как я рад что наткнулся на твой канал. Хоть я и плохо знаю английский, но твой посыл в видео понимаю, продолжай в том же духе😊! P. S. Я думаю многим тут интереснее видеть тесты более слабых видеокарт, нежели средне-топовых, на них и так понятно что все будет более менее хорошо, про топовые решения вообще молчу
I have almost everything same as your except RAM but I can't get the same FPS. But FPS always at 40-70 inside Hogwarts then in the open world around 60-70fps. My NVIDIA only utilise at 30% +- Any idea anyone can help me :') I have tried so many methods.
the issue is with people wanting games to use more of the cpu is it 1. the engine handles a lot of the multithreading but can be done by devs as well 2. the more threads you use for your game the more unstable it makes your operating system and also you have to handle locking the threads so windows doesn't take the thread the game uses vies versa because then it would cause the game to crash or different issues 3. you could run into an issue with diminishing returns because using multithreading each thread waits for another thread to finish as i have seen in a video on how it works compared to multiprocessing
I've been playing at 1440p dlss quality Ultra settings with a 3070 and 5600x and the stutter and random single digit frame rate when loading ateas or cutscenes with 2 crashes in 8 hours is annoying but it fixes itself quickly. Thinking about saving up for a 4070ti for vram and power as it's the cheapest upgrade and would perfectly make my experience for this game specifically nicer
@@davidjames3259 From what I've been told and from what I know, the 3070 beats the 6700xt in most games. There are some games that make it closer or make the 6700xt better. The 12gb of vram the 6700xt has makes it better off for games like Hogwarts Legacy where in Ultra settings the more vram is needed. In games like Forza Horizon 5 the 6700xt can beat the 3070 by a lot. When using RT the 3070 wipes the 6700xt though. The price difference is insane though. You can get a 6700xt for almost $200 cheaper than a 3070 rn. A 6800 xt which is closer to 3080 performance, for only $50 more than the cheapest 3070 when looking at PCPartPicker. A 3080 cost $300 more than that right now.
many years ago a GTX460 was considered premium GPU for gaming and nowadays people worry about if a 60 series card can still run the game on high not sure if i like what Nvidia has been doing
Makes me love my Xbox series x even more now, performance is about on par with an rtx3060ti with this game. I have an rtx3060ti, but haven’t tried the game on that but now I know I don’t need to at all, and now I’ll just keep playing it on the Xbox
I have a completely different experience with the game. Running on a desktop with 3060 12 GB vram, an i5 10500 and 16GB memory I get 40-70 frames. on 1080p resolution always. And the weird part is that it doesn't matter what settings I choose. Whether it's ultra with rtx on or mid with RTX off and DLSS, still 40-70 fps. Even after restarting the game. I'm not sure what's going on but if you have any ideas feel free to share them with me. I'm on the newest nvidia drivers as well
i wait this video so much !thanks lot!!i love this chanel ...u do nice job!!my salutation from far country Algeria !!u have all my support!!i folow this chanel long long time and every time enjoy any video there!!have fun and VIVA GAMING
its worth noting that this game doesn't care much about the GPU as it does the CPU. You need a hefty CPU for this game to run on high settings like that. I have the same GPU and my frames are halfed at the same settings.
hello, i love your videos and watch every one of them. i have a suggestion for you which i think would be great. what if you had 2 pcs, one with your 5800x3d and another with something like a 5600 and depending on the video card, you used the most fitting cpu. i know this is expensive and is probably not practical because the videos are to show the power of the gpu and it should not be limited at all by the cpu, but i really think a few people would appreciate it because for certain people, they will get a more accurate representation of their setup. keep making videos
The amount of GB's of video memory a card has is not an accurate measurement of how good a card will perform. A card with a larger memory bus can do more with 8GB's than a card with a smaller memory bus. So, just saying "You'll need more than 8gb's of video memory" is not really a sufficient claim. A 3070 with 8GBs does more with that 8GBs than a 3060 does with it's 12GB's. Just thought I'd throw that out there.
DO NOT TRUST THIS!!! I have 3060ti and i7 8700k and i can barely maintain 60 fps in this game with medium settings with DLSS. I do not know if its a problem on the game or epic games store or my pc or what not, but its totally unplayable for me.
that 58003d must be doing a lot of heavy lifting in Hogsmeade because I am running the same card paired with an i5-10400 and I get drops down to the 30s there though not frequently
I really don't know what to think about DLSS anymore. Lately it's starting to bother me a lot. It can enhance some details and degrade the rest and add ghosting.
Nice test... It looks like the specs they released for 1440p 60fps on ultra on RTX 2080 Ti were soon on... Next time maybe show some more intense combat with effects like the one at the beginning in the vault, that'll test the usage just right :D
one of the most intensive spots in the game that i have experienced is within Hogwarts. theres a hallway with some windows and it absolutely tanks for some reason. I can play on ultra ray tracing on and be fine until i hit that specific hall for some reason. I have a 6700xt. that would be a good place to test honestly lol
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
3060Ti was the best decision i've made in a while.. it's insane for the price
Considering how RTX 4090 doesn't do that much better on 4K...yes I'm happy with my 3060 to that I got at MSRP during the height of the crisis. 3060 ti gang!
Well, nothing is insane for the price... But compared to other GPU's the 3060 TI is one of the better buys I guess.
@@kezziekz try to turn on Ray Tracing and you see the difference between 4090 and 3060
@@kezziekz bruh even the 3080 has like 40% more fps than the 3060ti lmao thats cap asf
@@cryptex94 Probably not in newset games but in olders like Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition 3060ti can handle RT on ultra without DLSS in 1080p and Cyberpunk 2077 with quality DLSS in 1080p. I plan to test Control soon but so far its impressive i think for mid tier GPU besides RT is just cherry on top not something that will change game much.
My man literally tested my GPU with Hogwarts Legacy after I wondered about it's performance yesterday! Thanks a lot!
I am still not going to buy that game so close too launch though.
Buying Cyberpunk on launch day taught me a valuable lesson lol 😂
Thx god u didn't man, I'm using same GPU and playing ultra 1080p using dlss u can get up to 14 fps on some cinematics, it's so fking ugly.
@@luislack7655 I dunno wtf u guys on about, I've played CP at launch on a 3060ti and it was flawless, ultra + rt ultra + dlss balanced worked like a charm.
@@spectraleggings I don't know why people only talk about gpu only,when in the games now cpu just as important.Thats why I have no problem at all. (R7 5800x3d/rtx 3080ti/32gb ram/m2ssd) I'm getting 120-200fps all on ultra 1440p.
@@netsoldier363 yea I was getting happy when I saw the framerates for 4k with dlss then I realized his CPU eats mine alive... Still I hope for the best, I will play in march.
Bro same. Thank god this guy exists😁.
So happy to see you testing this game😁
the rtx 3060 ti is an amazing gpu. Upgraded it from my gtx 1070 since I had a 1440p monitor. Best decision that I've ever made!!
I upgraded from my 1660 Ti a couple months ago. This thing is a monster. Got it mildly below MSRP as well, so I’m more than happy with it.
4070ti best choise
@@gramazdil I would consider that more like a 4k gaming gpu even though Nvidia says it's made for 1440p gaming because of the cost and dlss. Also it wasn't released when I purchased my rtx 3060 ti
@Ellie m might be wrong with something else in your PC?
@Ellie m might be a cpu bottleneck. I new it's pretty new but it might bottleneck it in rdr2? I have a i7 6700k. It's old but I can get 60+ in rdr2. You also might play on to high settings in rdr2? You maybe run out of VRAM. I get like 120 fps plus in GTA V with almost maxed out settings with 4 times MMSA or what it's called. So it's nothing wrong with the graphic card hun. Your graphics card might be broken?
I hope we will see more 3060TI testing in future. Good work!
YES! i was wondering what the performance would be for my PC with this card and this is the first one used. Thank you!
I have a 2080, which is a bit slower, but close enough that it should perform quite similarly. My 3700x however is way slower than a 5800x3d.
@@atnfn you can probly get away with 1440p so I bet the CPU won't hold you back too much. I think it's a good sign that Kryzzp was getting held up by trying to play the game so IDK - not my bag but I do hope it's good.
@@atnfn I'm using an i9 9900k. i know its slower than his cpu but idk by how much. Should still perform well
@@atnfn о чем вы, у меня райзен 3600 и rtx 3060ti
also update the DLSS file to 2.5.1! makes a huge improvement to DLSS!! just a tip if you didn't know. take care!
Thanks for this friend your the only person that uploaded on a 3060ti
b550m, 5800x, 32gb 3200 ram, 1tb gen4 nvme, 3060ti. I play this game on my 27" 1080x60 monitor. All ultra settings with just RT settings off. I keep a constant 60FPS all the time. I played in TAA for many hours, but did change to DLAA & DLSS quality just to test it. Since I am capped at 60 fps, I don't see an FPS difference. But, I do think DLAA & DLSS quality look better.
That gpu looks beautiful
I love it
@@Jason_Bover9000 my 3080 looks better
@@bradlyboy328 where is it
@@bradlyboy328 calm down hotshot
@@bradlyboy328 you're so cool
The instability might because the games not actually out yet officially.
The day 1 GPU drivers will be on the 10th of February I think, hopefully that resolves some of these issues.
*EDIT* No official drivers have been launced. :(
Yeah i hope so
Lol pc gaming sucks
@@sunnyjim28 yeah right now, every game comes out fuckn broken lol so I feel you
This is a great video! Thanks for sharing so many settings options.
Quick update, atleast for me it feels like the game is running much better now for me on my 3060ti then it did a few days ago. Assuming something improved over the past few days. Just got done playing a quick hour session on high settings with like two things on medium and it managed to maintain constant 70-75 fps for me ( i have it capped since im on a 75hz monitor). It only tends to dip into the low 60's during certain areas where the game considers demanding i suppose, like a couple areas at hogwarts castle. But the vast majority of the time, its running well enough past 60, up into the 90-100's uncapped, no constant huge stutters anymore ( the notorious 20 fps drop aswell), all gone it seems.. Im playing on a 16gb system with a 3600 if that helps.
Had the most fun just now flying around and seeing how well good the world looks surrounding the castle. Honestly, despite the minor issues with fps/optimization and whatnot, im enjoying the game immensely and would say some of the early criticism were overblown. This game was definitely worth the price.
I've seen a lot of people complain that there is a memory leak. People have seen it go over 32GB and it just slowly creeps up there. So, they might have a problem, rather than it being RAM intensive.
It’s not a memory leak. Ps5 has ridiculous ssd to vram bandwidth that pcs just can’t match. Only way is to cache in ram. TLOU, Returnal, Hogwarts all have exactly the same issue: Vram load spikes that amd has not.
@@teahousereloaded That "could" explain it, but if that is what's going on... it's still a dev issue, not a hardware one. PCs can absolutely match, and even beat, the consoles at this point because they have Direct Storage, and PCs have the ability to use Gen5 SSDs so they can be even faster than the consoles can. If they decided not to include that in their game for the PC and it causes these issues, it's still a problem with the game... not the hardware, because PCs are absolutely capable of the same, or faster, SSD to VRAM bandwidth as the consoles.
70-100FPS 1080P/Ultra settings, thats really good. I knew i bought good card for its price
i have the same card but have 40-50 fps at default settings (medium + DLSS Quality, 1080p) what's wrong?
The game looks BEAUTIFUL at MEDIUM settings (Native resolution). This really surprised me! It also seems to have few bugs, nothing like Forspoken...
Kryzzp, thank you for testing this game at so many different resolutions, settings and DLSS and the 3060 Ti is a great card
It's still very intensive
Forspoken was good too
@@Kiporino it's Not.
If anyone's wondering about Rx 6750xt, you can run the game on ultra setting without RT, 1440p for Above 90fps in interior and outside it stays around 60 with intense scenes dropping it around 54fps.
Process: i5 12400f
Ram: 16gb
Really? Good to hear that, thanks for the info! I'll play it on high though.
@@MrJavi94 yes I got home today and found that playing with ultra and fsr 2.0 is best of both world, I get around 87fps outside without much visual difference.
And I was surprised that my games end up using only 10-11gb ram for some reason idk why. Even when fsr was off.
Really not bad for launch, I expect that after a few patches we'll see a way smoother experience. In the mean time I can definitely live with 65-70 avg at 1440p high .
yeah but he's uisng a Ryzen 7 5800X3D and 3533MHz RAM which makes all the difference in the world.
Decent results, considering how good it launched on all platforms it might get even better with some patches
Awesome vid, Kryzzp! Hope you do RX 6600XT next! Also would love to see how the game performs if you have just 16GB RAM
In another benchmark I saw this game easily taking 18 Gb of RAM in 1080p Ultra with no RT. So yeah, I suppose it's either game is badly optimized or the age of 16 Gb RAM is over. Sad, because that's how much RAM I have
@@maksymokolot4648 no the optimization is pretty good actually, if you experience major stutter that's most likely denuvo doing, even the ryzen 5 5600g can run this at 900p with fsr balance at 30fps, pretty mind-blowing
@@arcueid3352 "even 5 5600g runs this at 900p"
*shamefully hide my ryzen 5 3600*
😁😁
@@maksymokolot4648 Bro 16gb is enough
@@LordZeus9313 I know, but not for this game apparently. Or rather not with Ultra settings
You should test more in castle, because sometimes I got huge stutters and frames from 100 to 20 for like about 10 seconds and it's not because of loading textures.
That's probably denuvo's fault
Yeah same here. Hoping it gets better with the day one patch
Especially when you open doors.
Its insane how beautiful medium looks already
Rdr2 looks way better imo
@@michubern1444 :)
@@michubern1444 Both looks good on their own way
@@harithizzuddin i think its just crazy how still nothing comes even close.
@@michubern1444 I like RDR2 but I'd drop my fps to 30 if it meant I could eliminate all of the close foliage LOD changes.
10:55 you are actually hitting the engine bottleneck as it is hardly the cpu's fault, right?
If Rtx 3060ti was at msrp this thing would be loved by everyone.
I grabbed one at msrp from Best Buy (FE) while they were still in stock a couple months ago.
I got it for 500$ 2 weeks ago
@@dolan_plz i have 1080p 144hz so it's really good in my situation
@@dolan_plz The thing is a lot of people are complaining about 8gb of Vram but i find it suitable for 1080p in the coming few years
@@lazymeow3633 my 3080 was 500$ you got ripped off
Came here for the numbers. Stayed for the commentary and game play 😁. Keep up the great work !
Kudos to you for covering this game, even with great production quality! The way you delivered information was fast and precise, your settings used actually made sense (compared to the 60000 articles out there reviewing the performance with Ultra settings + RT on), and having timestamps was a nice touch. After seeing Digital Foundry chickening out of covering this game due to outcries from Twitter nobodies, I think this could be a great time for you to boost this channel's popularity even further. Keep up the good work!
Thank you so much! Glad you enjoyed the video :)
quick tip, You can swap between day and night by opening the map and pressing R3 (on controller) - the exact button to press on PC will be at the bottom right
I’m playing on an RTX 3070 on high with no ray tracing and sometimes the game drops to 30fps and it crashed like 2 times. The game is fun and amazing when it doesn’t crash, but I hope the developers will patch the game with an update later. I don’t know how al they are going to make this thing run on switch though
In Red Dead Redemption at 2560x1440 resolution, plus texture mods, my VRAM is over 8GB and I don't have any stuttering at all.
great video i hope ull do the 3070ti one too if possible, love your content btw keep it up
Thank you! I don't have that one though :(
@@zWORMzGaming what about 4070 ti?
men, you are the doppelganger of "toro tocho reviews". The spaniard tech reviewer.
Awesome video man, I'd love to see a video at some point where you show how to set up your On Screen Display. Like how to get the different colours for GPU, CPU and how to get the gaps between them and also the frametime graph, I really like the way it looks. Anyway, great video man, love the content!
I'm gonna do it at some point :)
@@zWORMzGaming Let's goooo, I'm hyped for that video!
Thanks this has definitely reassured me that it’s definitely my Ram at this point and not my VRAM and once the game’s optimized it’ll be even more enjoyable
No it won't optimize. This is Unreal engine. Ram is the only upgrades
can you do a 1440p video for the rtx 3060 ti in 2023?
Finalmente um jogo que não tem 30 mil problemas de performance
Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk o jogo é extremamente pesado, e nem gráficos muitos bonitos ele tem, a placa precisa de dlss pra rodar em FULLHD e no alto e ainda caí abaixo dos 60 fps, stutterings em todos os lados. Queria saber em mundo vcs vivem
@@capetamenino Ele tem graficos bonitos sim? Roda melhor que muitos jogos que sairam recentemente kkk, tem um problema de stuttering (e o mais calmo que vi recentemente também)
@@capetamenino ué na onde vc viu isso? 3060ti tá rodando até em 1440p no ultra e dlss qualidade, pra mim tá ótimo
@@capetamenino tá achando ruim joga no ps5 a 30 fps jkkkk
@@MasterWy Tá rodando nessa parte, e nem é a mais pesada, deixa ele pegar a vassoura pra voar
You also have to remember than Drivers aren't all out and whatnot so the game isn't at full optimization atm for a lot of cards.
I remember when the min spec was once said to be a 1070 until they changed it to a 960, I wonder what both would be like performance wise on this game. 🤔
GTX 1060 is getting decent performance on 1080p medium, so 1070 would get significantly better.
For 960, I haven't seen benchmarks but I guess the 2Gb version is struggling hard
This video card is truly the best bang for buck out. Such a satisfying purchase.
This game looks great, I assume by the time full release comes out it would have a fullscreen mode. Seems a bit weird that its not there but it doesnt stop this game from looking stunning
@@cliffz9545 Sir did you.. did you watch the first 4 minutes of the video..
I don't normally like blaming bad optimization if it is unclear as to why a game performs worse than expected or a bit more intensive than usual but the gpu usage was dropping regularly below 98% regardless of settings even if only by a few points and cpu usage was never very high, this is a clear indication of bad optimization.
The Castle is very demanding. the game definitly needs a update
I am really interesting to see all your videos for this game and you recommended settings
I’m so glad this game isn’t broken/unoptimised as some may have been fearing, especially after the whole “Foresbroken” situation. Glad to hear no “Hogwarts LAGecy” from Kryzzps :)
It's pretty broken for me. I have 100fps with 55% GPU utilization in one scene, and 25fps with 100% utilization in another. Very strange performance.
This comment wont age well trust me....
Still 7gb vramusage on medium? It has already killed the rtx 3060 laptop lol
@@ryanspencer6778 i play 1080p ultra on rx6600xt, it run fine thoo, just stutter a bit because i install my game on HDD
And cutscene sometime it drop so nothing special, the game look better than expected, even a gtx 1650 can play this game well
@@beataoo I have a rtx 3050 laptop 😭
Please make a video for 3060 ti in 2023!
Hey Kryzzp! Could you test this game on the 4070ti? I've been looking at that gpu for some time now as an upgrade, literally just to play this game.
I will test the 4070ti yes :)
@@zWORMzGaming Thanks!
Was gonna buy this game but will wait for a few months or a year till I can upgrade my ram
I tried my 3070 today with the game with rtx on medium and everything high and experienced huge drops from 90 to 20 fps. I'm curious if you're going to have similar issues. I was on quality DLSS
I have 3060ti card & have the same issue with RT on... so i turn off RT
I got a 3060ti and installing the game as we speak ... but wanted to watch your vid first hehe. The 1030 vid was horrifying with those textures and Jack lol.
Can you try the game with an AMD GPU please ? Like 6600/XT/6700/XT/6800/XT or even 6900, I'm curious of how it runs on these gpus
I hate how fast GPUs can become obsolete. 3060 Ti isn't even 2 years old but will have trouble with AAA games already
of course it will, otherwise there would be no need to upgrade for people.
My brother just sold his less then one year old 3080 for 570€ and bought himself 4080 for 1100€
people are insane
I'm ok with my 3060ti strix and a770le for years to come. Not everyone needs to play the newest AAA titles at 4k. After all the game is the same shit anyway
Few years ago I used to use riva tuner to lock frametime, it worked better than fps cap built in games. Maybe it would fix the stuttering here?
Great video, hope you continue to test out this GPU!
Thanks for the awesome content 👏Do you have an RX 6700 XT, could you please test it as well?
Remember that the actual release date is on Feb 10th. Day 1 patch might fix so many issues.
G'day Kryzzp & Digimoon,
Yeah I agree this game does look so much better than ForsBROKEN! While some of the Textures are a bit lacking the Shadows are Amazing, it will be interesting to see how Textures react with 12GB-16GB VRAM. Also when Harry is moving there is Fluidity rather than the Right foot down/Left foot down clunkiness of the Character in ForBROKEN!
Ps it will be interesting to see how GPUs with 4GB-6GB VRAM like the RX570/580 & GTX1060 do in this one.
The ram usage seems to be rather erratic. Sometimes it’s using 10ish and other times it’s using more than 25gb. (In the same areas).
I’m disappointed in the performance thus far. A lot of stuttering, extremely low dips in nearly single digit fps that require a restart to fix. Fps dips in the beginning of cutscenes with a lot of npc’s around.
I’m confident patches will come out to resolve these eventually. But sadly it’s just another case of a poorly optimized pc title/port. Whether it’s a lack of testing or strict release date windows it still blows my mind studios release games in this kind of state. Though at the very least, it’s not as bad as some other titles we have seen in the past….
Or some of the other titles we have seen in the present.
I think it also has issues on consoles so all around a bad port it seems.
@@speedforce8970 Honestly it seems okay to me, not many games run on 1050Ti or 960 these days.
Ох парень, как я рад что наткнулся на твой канал. Хоть я и плохо знаю английский, но твой посыл в видео понимаю, продолжай в том же духе😊!
P. S. Я думаю многим тут интереснее видеть тесты более слабых видеокарт, нежели средне-топовых, на них и так понятно что все будет более менее хорошо, про топовые решения вообще молчу
I have almost everything same as your except RAM but I can't get the same FPS. But FPS always at 40-70 inside Hogwarts then in the open world around 60-70fps. My NVIDIA only utilise at 30% +- Any idea anyone can help me :') I have tried so many methods.
3060 ti and ryzen processor for me
the issue is with people wanting games to use more of the cpu is it
1. the engine handles a lot of the multithreading but can be done by devs as well
2. the more threads you use for your game the more unstable it makes your operating system and also you have to handle locking the threads so windows doesn't take the thread the game uses vies versa because then it would cause the game to crash or different issues
3. you could run into an issue with diminishing returns because using multithreading each thread waits for another thread to finish as i have seen in a video on how it works compared to multiprocessing
Can you do the rtx 3060 laptop next so I can see how my laptop will perform
Holy moly the RAM consumption
The game was built on unreal 4 so that may explain the stuttering.
its 4am in my country lol btw nice video as always
I've been playing at 1440p dlss quality Ultra settings with a 3070 and 5600x and the stutter and random single digit frame rate when loading ateas or cutscenes with 2 crashes in 8 hours is annoying but it fixes itself quickly. Thinking about saving up for a 4070ti for vram and power as it's the cheapest upgrade and would perfectly make my experience for this game specifically nicer
what do u think is better, 3070 or RX6700 XT ?
@@davidjames3259 From what I've been told and from what I know, the 3070 beats the 6700xt in most games. There are some games that make it closer or make the 6700xt better. The 12gb of vram the 6700xt has makes it better off for games like Hogwarts Legacy where in Ultra settings the more vram is needed. In games like Forza Horizon 5 the 6700xt can beat the 3070 by a lot. When using RT the 3070 wipes the 6700xt though. The price difference is insane though. You can get a 6700xt for almost $200 cheaper than a 3070 rn. A 6800 xt which is closer to 3080 performance, for only $50 more than the cheapest 3070 when looking at PCPartPicker. A 3080 cost $300 more than that right now.
Our boy comes through again
many years ago a GTX460 was considered premium GPU for gaming and nowadays people worry about if a 60 series card can still run the game on high
not sure if i like what Nvidia has been doing
Thank you for your video! This helps a lot!
Glad it helped! Thanks for watching :)
Makes me love my Xbox series x even more now, performance is about on par with an rtx3060ti with this game. I have an rtx3060ti, but haven’t tried the game on that but now I know I don’t need to at all, and now I’ll just keep playing it on the Xbox
Love your uploads💯👌
Just bought the deluxe version. Got the same GPU but with 3900X. Going to play more at the weekend but going to have a quick go tonight :)
I have a completely different experience with the game. Running on a desktop with 3060 12 GB vram, an i5 10500 and 16GB memory I get 40-70 frames. on 1080p resolution always. And the weird part is that it doesn't matter what settings I choose. Whether it's ultra with rtx on or mid with RTX off and DLSS, still 40-70 fps. Even after restarting the game. I'm not sure what's going on but if you have any ideas feel free to share them with me. I'm on the newest nvidia drivers as well
same with me, its the cpu, I guess we need a 5800x3d =)
Probably CPU and RAM, this game seems to like a lot of RAM more than 16 GB at the very least and cache size on the CPU which 5800X3D has a ton of L3
@@ij6708 I see, thanks alot for the answers
This same happened with me in Spiderman
Is your RAM maxed out though?
The best gpu for price to performance accross ALL resolutions
It might very well be!
i wait this video so much !thanks lot!!i love this chanel ...u do nice job!!my salutation from far country Algeria !!u have all my support!!i folow this chanel long long time and every time enjoy any video there!!have fun and VIVA GAMING
OC cpu to 4.2MHz and GPU to 2050MHz and it plays on high like a dream. With 3060ti on 1440p
CPU at 4.2MHz will not even start computer.
26:07 that cape looked weird though.
🤣🤣🤣 I was already tired at the end of it, didn't even notice ahahah
its worth noting that this game doesn't care much about the GPU as it does the CPU. You need a hefty CPU for this game to run on high settings like that. I have the same GPU and my frames are halfed at the same settings.
The goat with a goated video
I thought this would be like forsbroken im surprised, great job bro.
hello, i love your videos and watch every one of them. i have a suggestion for you which i think would be great.
what if you had 2 pcs, one with your 5800x3d and another with something like a 5600 and depending on the video card, you used the most fitting cpu.
i know this is expensive and is probably not practical because the videos are to show the power of the gpu and it should not be limited at all by the cpu, but i really think a few people would appreciate it because for certain people, they will get a more accurate representation of their setup.
keep making videos
The amount of GB's of video memory a card has is not an accurate measurement of how good a card will perform. A card with a larger memory bus can do more with 8GB's than a card with a smaller memory bus. So, just saying "You'll need more than 8gb's of video memory" is not really a sufficient claim. A 3070 with 8GBs does more with that 8GBs than a 3060 does with it's 12GB's.
Just thought I'd throw that out there.
DO NOT TRUST THIS!!!
I have 3060ti and i7 8700k and i can barely maintain 60 fps in this game with medium settings with DLSS.
I do not know if its a problem on the game or epic games store or my pc or what not, but its totally unplayable for me.
It's a CPU bottleneck
@@zWORMzGaming My CPU never goes over 65% usage. I have tested it with the same MSI program ur apperantly using as well.
This was a "magical" benchmarking experience with "krizzp" Frame rates.
that 58003d must be doing a lot of heavy lifting in Hogsmeade because I am running the same card paired with an i5-10400 and I get drops down to the 30s there though not frequently
i have a ASUS STRIX 3060ti OC edition and its a beast of a card, never gets hotter than 60 c thanks to its massive overengineered cooler.
Not sure its a VRAM issue. Since stutters like that have been reported on the console versions as well as higher end GPU's.
Damn... I'm about to test the 4080 now to confirm this.
@@zWORMzGaming looking at posts on reddit it seems all over the place. One guy even claimed to get 120fps locked on a 3080. Not sure i believe that.
timing is perfect! I'm gonna pick this game up on my next paycheck. I ran out of money after buying this GPU lol
Modern day gaming problems 🙃
GPUs are too expensive...
my refurbished 3060 ti for $429 cad seemed too good to be true. paid $100 more for my 1070 back in 2017 and it slaughters that card
Pretty solid port. The developers took more care with this PC version than most AAA ports it's incredible.
You're tripping balls, there's no way this dude is maintaining these percentages. My 3080 not one time has hit 99% in this game. Rdr2 has my GPU at 99
Nice Video, love the rtx 3060 Ti
Best bang per buck card. Good to see it plays 1440p DLS High easily for a modern AAA
With a 6750 xt on 1440 Ultra with FSR 2.0 enabled, I'm getting around 150 fps in the castle and 90-100 fps outside.
Kryzzp can you benchmark with AMD GPU as a comparison to the NVIDIA one? thank you
1440p medium settings with best AA and no DLSS averages in 80 fps? Pretty good. My good old rtx2080 can do this!
hello plsss reply
should I buy 3060ti 8gb or 3060 12gb
will there will be any difference having more vram on upcoming games in the future
4:19 I think its the Tesseract infinity cube thing from avengers endgame.
can you test the 1080 ti? would appreciate it!
Definitely :)
I am happy I went with 32GB of ram rather than 16GB. Games now are using more than 16GB, imagine in a few years it will be nearer to 32GB.
32 GB is nice but its definitely not needed for a long time. Shame people are getting fooled into thinking otherwise.
Doing an upgrade right now 😊 Going to go with a 4080 / i9-13900k / DDR5 6400mhz / and MOBO recommendations???
I really don't know what to think about DLSS anymore. Lately it's starting to bother me a lot. It can enhance some details and degrade the rest and add ghosting.
Nice test... It looks like the specs they released for 1440p 60fps on ultra on RTX 2080 Ti were soon on... Next time maybe show some more intense combat with effects like the one at the beginning in the vault, that'll test the usage just right :D
one of the most intensive spots in the game that i have experienced is within Hogwarts. theres a hallway with some windows and it absolutely tanks for some reason. I can play on ultra ray tracing on and be fine until i hit that specific hall for some reason. I have a 6700xt. that would be a good place to test honestly lol
I knw9 a worse location go to the top of the owl building outside of the school