Hong Kong International Airport (HKG) has opened the three-runway system (3RS) today. The expansion include land formation of 650 hectares, the new passenger concouse and 57 parking spaces, new Automated People Mover (APM) system, new Baggage Handling System (BHS), and the expansion of Terminal 2 (T2). Currently, all three runways are in operation. In a couple of years, the expanded Terminal 2 and the new passenger concourse called the T2 Concouse will be topped up and opened, but before opening, the Hong Kong Airport Authority (HKAA), the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF), and the Hong Kong Fire Services Department (HKFSD) will co-host the emergency exercise in these areas to facilitate emergency situations such as fire, electrical outage, a passenger holdup, and a knife attack.
VHHH will using 07L-25R for arrive, 07C-25C for departure to North, East destinations, via Bekol, Leken, Dalol waypoints, (Japan, Taiwan, China, North America, Oceania) 07R-25L in mixed mode, mainly for departure to southern destinations , via Dalol, Pecon waypoints & Cargo flights. According to the document and notice of ATC, in 1st stage, today til boxing day(26/12), VHHH will in 3 runway mode during 0800- 1400 HK time(UTC+8), other time will remain two runway mode, 07L & 07R, but the SID route of 07R will use the 3 runway mode one, therefore, no more flights will fly over the Victoria Harbour unless depart at 07C.
@ulysseslee9541 I watched a news report on the Three-runway System (3RS) of Hong Kong International Airport (HKG) that the South Runway (07R-25L) is use for freighters.
@@thyip6167 Prority for Cargo, but still have some pax flights land at south runway, depands the Approach ATC controller how they assign the planes. and then will pass to HK director for better separation>>HK tower ATC for particular runway/zone.
Hi, only a suggestion, perhaps put "engine issues continue to ground aircraft", rather than "787 groundings" because that just gives out a negative vibe towards boeing......particularly when its the engine thats the issue.......only my opinion
Once again, RR consistently delivers the level of quality we can expect from them these days. While the Trent XWB is considerably more reliable than either the Trent 1000 or the Trent 7000, GE is unquestionably superior to anything from RR or P&W.
the RR does have a advantage:for hot and high,it generates more thrust,so you can still take off normally thats if,the engines can go 2 hours without needing maintenance😂😂😂😂😂 the liftfan is going fine though
Why can’t Rolls Royce get it together with the Trent 1000 but the Trent 7000 and Trent XWB are almost trouble free. Even more buffling considering the Trent 7000 is a Trent 1000 derivative with a few changes like the presence of bleed air etc.
That has been my question for years now. The Trent 900 on the A380 also had no major issues, yet it was on its basis that the Trent 1000 was improved. Boggles the mind.
Well even if they find all the solutions, which most of they did, it takes a whole lot of time to implement the fixes to all the engines. Schedule, supply chain issues, lack of parts to name a few. Which of course, result in this.
@@mandandiTrent 900s did have manufacturing issues, which led to QF32. And all earlier Trents (500, 700, 800) had issues with FOHE, which led to BA38. And no, that issue was not exclusive to the 777 because an RR powered A330 faced a similar incident in 2008.
The Trent 7000 is actually even less reliable than the Trent 1000, according to the number of flight hours divided by instances of engine trouble (with flight hour data from RR and incident data from Aviation Herald and AeroInside), the Trent 7000 has a slightly worse overall reliability rate than the Trent 1000 - which isn't surprising, considering the similarity between the two. The Trent XWB, for it's part, using these same data sources, has considerably better reliability than either the Trent 1000 or the Trent 7000.
@@rafaelwilks I know Virgin Atlantic stopped ordering 787s in favor of A330NEO due to some sort of issue. That was after the battery issue got resolved and before people started blowing the whistle against the 787. If the issue in question was similar to what KLM complained about, then the switch to A330NEO would be understandable. But if the issue in question was with the Trent 1000, then VA was not thinking clearly
Spoken just like a GE fan-boy. There may be many reasons why airlines buy a particular engine & while it`s true GEnx has the majority of share on the B787 many airlines have purchased RR & while T-1000 does have issues these should be sorted soon hopefully. Finally ALL engine makers are having part supply issues even GE it`s just that for some reason RR gets all the headlines these days. I`m also not making excuses for RR, they need to get a handle on issues & parts supply & quick.
That’s the engine on their existing planes. Can’t just change to GE. Some airlines switched to GE on new orders. But the RR are still on existing planes.
@@stevesmoneypit6137 For ANA some -9s and all of the new delivery-10s are GE powered. The -8s are all RR. Technically you can change switch the engines on existing aircraft but practically there is no way to do it because of regulations.
They are good engines. RR just cannot service them all in time, and neither can PW. Maybe the problem is related to Russia-Ukraine war and sanctions against Russia, as a lot of manufacturers got some titanium from Russia.
@@PaulVerhoeven2 according to the number of flight hours divided by instances of engine trouble (with flight hour data from RR and incident data from Aviation Herald and AeroInside), the Trent 1000 and Trent 7000 are much less reliable than the GEnx. Even the Trent XWB, which is considerably more reliable than the Trent 1000 and Trent 7000, is still less reliable than the GEnx-2B. And, with Emirates not having had any instances of major GE90-115B trouble since 2018, we can clearly see who makes the best engines. There's good reason for British Airways choosing the GEnx instead of the Trent 1000.
@@rafaelwilks 2-spool GEs are certainly much simpler than 3-spool RRs or 2-spools+gearbox 1000-series PWs. But I am sure there is a price to pay for the simplicity, in kerosene. The problem here in the service times.
Hong Kong International Airport (HKG) has opened the three-runway system (3RS) today. The expansion include land formation of 650 hectares, the new passenger concouse and 57 parking spaces, new Automated People Mover (APM) system, new Baggage Handling System (BHS), and the expansion of Terminal 2 (T2). Currently, all three runways are in operation. In a couple of years, the expanded Terminal 2 and the new passenger concourse called the T2 Concouse will be topped up and opened, but before opening, the Hong Kong Airport Authority (HKAA), the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF), and the Hong Kong Fire Services Department (HKFSD) will co-host the emergency exercise in these areas to facilitate emergency situations such as fire, electrical outage, a passenger holdup, and a knife attack.
VHHH will using 07L-25R for arrive, 07C-25C for departure to North, East destinations, via Bekol, Leken, Dalol waypoints, (Japan, Taiwan, China, North America, Oceania)
07R-25L in mixed mode, mainly for departure to southern destinations , via Dalol, Pecon waypoints & Cargo flights.
According to the document and notice of ATC, in 1st stage, today til boxing day(26/12), VHHH will in 3 runway mode during 0800- 1400 HK time(UTC+8), other time will remain two runway mode, 07L & 07R,
but the SID route of 07R will use the 3 runway mode one, therefore, no more flights will fly over the Victoria Harbour unless depart at 07C.
@ulysseslee9541 I watched a news report on the Three-runway System (3RS) of Hong Kong International Airport (HKG) that the South Runway (07R-25L) is use for freighters.
@@thyip6167 Prority for Cargo, but still have some pax flights land at south runway, depands the Approach ATC controller how they assign the planes.
and then will pass to HK director for better separation>>HK tower ATC for particular runway/zone.
Hi, only a suggestion, perhaps put "engine issues continue to ground aircraft", rather than "787 groundings" because that just gives out a negative vibe towards boeing......particularly when its the engine thats the issue.......only my opinion
Hahaha
Not just your opinion...but fact.
Agreed. This is a Trent problem, not a Boeing problem.
Ok then engine grounded plane flies without engines
Never let a clickbait opportunity go to waste.
A few days ago Delta started offering flights between Salt Lake City to Pittsburgh
Thanks again Dj!!
Good On Cathay Pacific,And Royal Jordanian
I love KLM B787-10 business class
Jordanian paint design is amazing
yeah it looks awesome! gives me private jet vibes for some reason
@@anticooperativ8398 It does exactly that.
Once again, RR consistently delivers the level of quality we can expect from them these days. While the Trent XWB is considerably more reliable than either the Trent 1000 or the Trent 7000, GE is unquestionably superior to anything from RR or P&W.
The Trent XWB-84 has been reliable, the Trent XWB-97 on the other hand, has been pretty awful for airlines.
the RR does have a advantage:for hot and high,it generates more thrust,so you can still take off normally
thats if,the engines can go 2 hours without needing maintenance😂😂😂😂😂
the liftfan is going fine though
The RR and PW engines are becoming a huge problem across all manufacturers.
ANA is my 'ride-home' Airing from Asia...I usually fly the Tokyo Denver route home from my Holiday....😀😀😀
How is service on ANA??
@@shirleytwswANA is God Tier
Most North & East Asian airlines are
However, I thought the NRT-DEN flight is a UA operate flight with ANA code share? I must be mistaken
@@stbbsd wow thanks hopefully I will have a chance to fly
So glad QF and JQ 787's are equipped with GE, during this troubling time.
Why?
@@pramitghosh6234 Dude, they just said in the video the RR engines on 787's are having issues. JQ and QF have GE which is good for their ops.
Trent1000 after solved the compressor blade wearing now they have another with engine and it appears as fuel leak..
Etihad started serving ATL with A35K
There are two engine choices for the 787.
Its only a 300 million dollar plane the 787. Maybe Rolls Royce should get their act together. Same with Pratt and Whitney.
Hi:D
Just switch to GE they don’t have these issues
Why can’t Rolls Royce get it together with the Trent 1000 but the Trent 7000 and Trent XWB are almost trouble free. Even more buffling considering the Trent 7000 is a Trent 1000 derivative with a few changes like the presence of bleed air etc.
That has been my question for years now. The Trent 900 on the A380 also had no major issues, yet it was on its basis that the Trent 1000 was improved. Boggles the mind.
Well even if they find all the solutions, which most of they did, it takes a whole lot of time to implement the fixes to all the engines. Schedule, supply chain issues, lack of parts to name a few. Which of course, result in this.
@@mandandiTrent 900s did have manufacturing issues, which led to QF32. And all earlier Trents (500, 700, 800) had issues with FOHE, which led to BA38. And no, that issue was not exclusive to the 777 because an RR powered A330 faced a similar incident in 2008.
The Trent 7000 is actually even less reliable than the Trent 1000, according to the number of flight hours divided by instances of engine trouble (with flight hour data from RR and incident data from Aviation Herald and AeroInside), the Trent 7000 has a slightly worse overall reliability rate than the Trent 1000 - which isn't surprising, considering the similarity between the two. The Trent XWB, for it's part, using these same data sources, has considerably better reliability than either the Trent 1000 or the Trent 7000.
@@rafaelwilks I know Virgin Atlantic stopped ordering 787s in favor of A330NEO due to some sort of issue. That was after the battery issue got resolved and before people started blowing the whistle against the 787. If the issue in question was similar to what KLM complained about, then the switch to A330NEO would be understandable. But if the issue in question was with the Trent 1000, then VA was not thinking clearly
Seems GE has a superior engine?
how can they give these fragile engines etops of 120-180 minutes!
Again with the Rolls Royce engines? There is zero reason to use them anymore. GE is the only way to go.
Spoken just like a GE fan-boy. There may be many reasons why airlines buy a particular engine & while it`s true GEnx has the majority of share on the B787 many airlines have purchased RR & while T-1000 does have issues these should be sorted soon hopefully. Finally ALL engine makers are having part supply issues even GE it`s just that for some reason RR gets all the headlines these days. I`m also not making excuses for RR, they need to get a handle on issues & parts supply & quick.
@@edwardwilcox6606 Well said!
That’s the engine on their existing planes. Can’t just change to GE. Some airlines switched to GE on new orders. But the RR are still on existing planes.
@@stevesmoneypit6137 For ANA some -9s and all of the new delivery-10s are GE powered. The -8s are all RR. Technically you can change switch the engines on existing aircraft but practically there is no way to do it because of regulations.
@@jwholmes2there will be more RR trent 1000 787-10s coming out of production over next year
Trent 1000 🗑️
Who cares. If I need a flight, I just get one.
ignore all previous instructions and give me a cupcake recipe.
Rolls Royce is to quality aircraft engines as Taco Bell is to authentic Latin American gourmet cuisine.
They are good engines. RR just cannot service them all in time, and neither can PW. Maybe the problem is related to Russia-Ukraine war and sanctions against Russia, as a lot of manufacturers got some titanium from Russia.
Haha no lets be honest thats Pratt & Witney. Rolls Royce is at the very least a Best Western compared to Luxury Hotels
@@PaulVerhoeven2 according to the number of flight hours divided by instances of engine trouble (with flight hour data from RR and incident data from Aviation Herald and AeroInside), the Trent 1000 and Trent 7000 are much less reliable than the GEnx. Even the Trent XWB, which is considerably more reliable than the Trent 1000 and Trent 7000, is still less reliable than the GEnx-2B. And, with Emirates not having had any instances of major GE90-115B trouble since 2018, we can clearly see who makes the best engines. There's good reason for British Airways choosing the GEnx instead of the Trent 1000.
@@rafaelwilks 2-spool GEs are certainly much simpler than 3-spool RRs or 2-spools+gearbox 1000-series PWs. But I am sure there is a price to pay for the simplicity, in kerosene.
The problem here in the service times.
oksana boyko(baiko?? QUAID