There was a video James Cripen was in, 1491 Americas Before Columbus I have seen about Tlingit Navajo and a language in South America, but it's been so long I can't remember the people in S. America, it would be something to connect all 4 of our languages and show that similarities? Also seems like research our people should be funding our people to do? Gunalchéesh for the presentation and hat's off to Sealaska Heritage brining these videos and so much more out to our people, Gunalchéesh tléin
So... Yeniseian - Na-Dene is Y-haplogroup Q, Burushaski is R2, and Indo-European is R1a (satem) and R1b (kentum). So shouldn't we be looking for the language of R (Buru-Yeni-Na-Dene) and P1 (Indo-European-Buru-Yeni-Na-Dene), P1 being the 'parent' of Q and R?
That's not how language families work. For an effective primer, read Lyle Campbell's "Historical Linguistics". Hint: familial relationships between languages have nothing to do with haplogroups.
@@lexandrosphynx1049 Familial relationships between languages have everything to do with haplogroups. People learn to speak from their parents. Occasionally that is not the case; it could be that your ethnic group is partially wiped out (eg. in the Americas).
@@someopinion2846 I mean, sure. Children literally plug their ears when anyone around them speaks something other than their parents' language, and no one in this world has ever learned a second language. How does your theory work with mtDNA haplogroups, I wonder? Is language only genetically determined by the fathers' Y chromosome, or also the mothers' mitochondrial DNA? Were people in certain Y-haplogroups only permitted to reproduce with people in certain mtDNA-haplogroups so that their language and genetics lined up for future researchers? I can only imagine the inbreeding! Certainly, your theory requires that no linguistic population ever conquer, or be conquered, by another. In fact, it would require that no social change or migration happened ever, just to make sure the same groups didn't mix, either genetically or linguistically. War? Immigration? Colonization? Assimilation? Biracial coupling? Cultural and linguistic contact? Trade networks? None of these have EVER occurred in 12,000 years of anatomically modern human development, right? I mean, even now, no one ever learns a language that doesn't belong to their parents' genetic lineage! On the real, you should never go into linguistics, my friend. It'll be a tough road for you.
@@lexandrosphynx1049 People learn to speak from their parents. Occasionally that is not the case; it could be that your ethnic group, as defined by its Y-DNA haplogroup is wiped out, namely when it is conquered by a group of a different Y-DNA haplogroup. Women usually survive that type of ethnic cleansing. Were people in certain Y-haplogroups only permitted to reproduce with people in certain mtDNA-haplogroups? Yes, that's the outcome of conquests.
3000 miles!? Other countries are closer to Alaska than the Ket are! Mongolia, Korea, China, other parts of Siberia besides the Ket, Japan, etc. are closer to Alaska than the Ket are!
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Amazing lecture! If you have him back please post more
amazing lecture and explaining in an accessible way. here's to compiling additional evidence for this hypothesis!
There was a video James Cripen was in, 1491 Americas Before Columbus I have seen about Tlingit Navajo and a language in South America, but it's been so long I can't remember the people in S. America, it would be something to connect all 4 of our languages and show that similarities? Also seems like research our people should be funding our people to do? Gunalchéesh for the presentation and hat's off to Sealaska Heritage brining these videos and so much more out to our people, Gunalchéesh tléin
Блин, Вайда: до чего ж ты крутой мужик 👍
So...
Yeniseian - Na-Dene is Y-haplogroup Q, Burushaski is R2, and Indo-European is R1a (satem) and R1b (kentum). So shouldn't we be looking for the language of R (Buru-Yeni-Na-Dene) and P1 (Indo-European-Buru-Yeni-Na-Dene), P1 being the 'parent' of Q and R?
That's not how language families work. For an effective primer, read Lyle Campbell's "Historical Linguistics".
Hint: familial relationships between languages have nothing to do with haplogroups.
@@lexandrosphynx1049
Familial relationships between languages have everything to do with haplogroups. People learn to speak from their parents. Occasionally that is not the case; it could be that your ethnic group is partially wiped out (eg. in the Americas).
@@someopinion2846 I mean, sure. Children literally plug their ears when anyone around them speaks something other than their parents' language, and no one in this world has ever learned a second language.
How does your theory work with mtDNA haplogroups, I wonder? Is language only genetically determined by the fathers' Y chromosome, or also the mothers' mitochondrial DNA? Were people in certain Y-haplogroups only permitted to reproduce with people in certain mtDNA-haplogroups so that their language and genetics lined up for future researchers? I can only imagine the inbreeding!
Certainly, your theory requires that no linguistic population ever conquer, or be conquered, by another. In fact, it would require that no social change or migration happened ever, just to make sure the same groups didn't mix, either genetically or linguistically. War? Immigration? Colonization? Assimilation? Biracial coupling? Cultural and linguistic contact? Trade networks? None of these have EVER occurred in 12,000 years of anatomically modern human development, right? I mean, even now, no one ever learns a language that doesn't belong to their parents' genetic lineage!
On the real, you should never go into linguistics, my friend. It'll be a tough road for you.
@@lexandrosphynx1049
People learn to speak from their parents. Occasionally that is not the case; it could be that your ethnic group, as defined by its Y-DNA haplogroup is wiped out, namely when it is conquered by a group of a different Y-DNA haplogroup. Women usually survive that type of ethnic cleansing.
Were people in certain Y-haplogroups only permitted to reproduce with people in certain mtDNA-haplogroups? Yes, that's the outcome of conquests.
@@someopinion2846 I am sorry that your education system has failed you so badly.
Gods must be crazy
3000 miles!? Other countries are closer to Alaska than the Ket are! Mongolia, Korea, China, other parts of Siberia besides the Ket, Japan, etc. are closer to Alaska than the Ket are!
Humana came from Africa and spread around the world, so 3000 miles is nothing, lol
India is pretty far from Iceland too. Isolation can accompany quite conservative tendencies.
Lies
🤣
So?