JUST IN: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Case Concerning Post-Seizure Probable Cause Hearings
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 окт 2023
- On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Culley v. Marshall.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
This is very important for justice
1:20:30 Presumptions unstated cannot be refuted
No they determine if it's constitutional. Anyone can read the constitution. What you think those that write and pass the bills should be the ones that determine if they are constitutional? 😅
32:00 Request a rentension hearing, which is a right of due process?
Lawyer did a good job of summarizing and elaborating, but dropped the ball. SCoTUS can't rule a right be requested.
1:34:20 The case had conflicting conclusions of law, but you should conclude with what I have determined to be correct because I say so😂
1:22:30 The State argues laws should not change because they have existed for 200 years.
Slavery was law for much longer.
Now, they've renamed slaves as citizens
55:35 "yes your honor" he didn't deny the existance of Kangaroo Courts...he agreed they exist