nice video not hate or anything, but i see that you only loaded an image on the flash what if some other flash is damaged and the image isnt stored on that flash at all? or a part of a flash is damaged, if you could please do this test again but fill the drive to its max capacity (64 gigs) and then do it (preferrably with a video file) then check its hash before and after test so that if even a single bit has flipped the hash will change, cause a single bit flip in a video might just drop a pixel or two which we cant notice (this same thing mightve happened with the image to idk like a bit flip to the metadata or smth) if the hash before and after are same, then boom water proof, if its different but the entire file seems right, still waterproof but not recommended for some stuff that needs that exact data and not even a single bit should be flipped (a physicist or any home scientist, but if in water for more time then i guess the videos can get corrupted)
How did you format the drive it to get those speeds ? Was it ExFat, or NTFS ! Did you try with different block sizes , do you know HOW to used DiskPart ?
Just checked, I get same speeds with both NTFS or exFAT which is 277 read and 35 write but on my main PC I get 254 read which is a bit weird. On both I use USBC connection directly, without an adapter. Also, not sure why in this video I got 304, maybe the heat tests I've made after this affected the drive a bit. What speeds do you get?
Haha I know. My test PC is a Celeron mini pc, I don't want to risk my main one with potentially faulty USB drives. This doesn't affect the speed test though.
![ТОП-7. Лучшие USB флешки [Flash накопители]. Рейтинг 2024 года!](/img/1.gif)
nice video not hate or anything, but i see that you only loaded an image on the flash
what if some other flash is damaged and the image isnt stored on that flash at all? or a part of a flash is damaged, if you could please do this test again but fill the drive to its max capacity (64 gigs) and then do it (preferrably with a video file) then check its hash before and after test so that if even a single bit has flipped the hash will change, cause a single bit flip in a video might just drop a pixel or two which we cant notice (this same thing mightve happened with the image to idk like a bit flip to the metadata or smth)
if the hash before and after are same, then boom water proof, if its different but the entire file seems right, still waterproof but not recommended for some stuff that needs that exact data and not even a single bit should be flipped (a physicist or any home scientist, but if in water for more time then i guess the videos can get corrupted)
Yeah, I could try doing that next!
Now that would be a proper speed test. And
To evaluate properly, how was the drive formatted.
Block size ??
ExFat, NTFS, HFS+ ?
How did you format the drive it to get those speeds ? Was it ExFat, or NTFS !
Did you try with different block sizes , do you know HOW to used DiskPart ?
Just checked, I get same speeds with both NTFS or exFAT which is 277 read and 35 write but on my main PC I get 254 read which is a bit weird. On both I use USBC connection directly, without an adapter. Also, not sure why in this video I got 304, maybe the heat tests I've made after this affected the drive a bit. What speeds do you get?
@@AudioCuriosity mostly the same as you. I have tried different cables but it stays around 300.
your pc is very slow man
Haha I know. My test PC is a Celeron mini pc, I don't want to risk my main one with potentially faulty USB drives. This doesn't affect the speed test though.
you could've save the water and sent it to the Africans
no hate
Please just use enough water 🥲