Thanks for your insights, Allison. I travel with a very similar kit: 16-35/4, 35/1.8 Macro and 70-200/4. If I’m feeling adventurous, I may substitute a 50/1.2 for the 35/1.8. Either way, with just three lenses, I find I’m ready for anything.
I just went on vacation. Most of the time I had my older 24-70 f4. I wouldnt shoot faster than f4 because I want the background not too blown out so we can show off the background. My other lens was 28 f2. Awesome for night shots and when I wanted better bokeh. I love these two for travel because they are small and light. Perfect for when Im actually on vacation. Everything else is too heavy and just becomes work. The 24-105 is awesome just too big when Im trying to enjoy nature or disneyland with my kids.
I watched many videos trying to figure out which lens to buy for travel. Your video is the best. You are video was concise, to the point and enjoyable to watch. Thank you for your help!
16-35 GM, 24-105 G, 100-400 GM. For a safari trip I’ll add the 200-600 G and 1.4x teleconverter. For night city scape I’ll add my 24mm 1.4 GM and for a botanical garden the 90mm macro G I prefer the 24-105 on the 24-70 because of the OSS and reach, truly all around amazing lens
My favourite lenses for travel are the 16-35 F2.8 GM and the 70-200 F2.8 GM2. Using APS mode on the 16-35 I also have effectively 50mm available. For the 70-200 I also take the 2x teleconverter to give me up to 400mm for wildlife. As this is such a fast lens,that still gives F5.6 at 400, the same as the 100-400, so this is a more useful and adaptable lens.
Ditto. With the a7IV, it delivers. It’s a bit heavy now that I’m older/retired. The pending 16-35mm PZ with crop and electronic zoom might be perfect for travel and long walkabouts.
I’ve been shooting News and Current Affairs with ENG cameras for over 30 years. Now I mostly use an FS7 and A7S3. Lenses I use are very similar to what is in this video. 24-70F2.8 Gmaster, 70-200F4, selp18-110F4, then samyang 14 and 35mm T1.5 cine primes. New 16-35F5PZ is on order, exporting delivery end May.
a-1 w/ 17-40f/4, 85 f1.4, 28f/2, is great for european cities/ wine country, Mediterranean coast, fits in a smallish stealth non-photo bag - 24 isn't wide enough, 35 to 70 isn't long enough, and the 85 has fantastic 3D subject isolation for portraits and short tele architectural/landscape shots with so much crispy sharpness
I've shot primes for most of my photographing life. Although it is a pain to change lenses, I love a 24, 50 & 105 combo. I'm not a pro photographer but splurged and have the 24mm 1.4 and 50mm 1.2 G-master lenses for my A7iii. for the 105mm I'm still using a classic Nikon-P 105mm 2.5. Im planing on a trip to New Zealand in 2023 and will for sure take the 24 & 50. I also have the Batis 85mm 1.8 so it will be a battle not to take it and maybe leave the 105mm home.
Visited NZ last March and suggest you think about adding more reach as there are many occasions where, due to access issues, you might find the nearest positioning leaves you with too much foreground. Just a thought … it depends on your own style. Enjoy the trip - it is a very beautiful country.
For just a light kit for travel, I use the Sony 20mm f1.8 g, Sigma 65mm f2 and Sigma 90mm f 2.8. Very small bag. For events, the Tamron 70-180, Tamron 28-75 g2 and Sigma 85mm f1.4. I’ve had GM lenses before and I find my current lenses give about 95% of the performance at a much lower price for those of us on a budget.
It all depends where you are going and what are going to shoot. What I will say is that you are missing a lens that I love for travel photography - the Sony 24-240mm. Scott Kelby talked about travel zooms in a bunch of videos and it really convinced me to try one. Moment can often be the most important thing in photography - especially when travelling - and not having to change lenses can be priceless (especially when traveling with other people). You should try it :) I typically take a 16-35mm F2.8, 24-70mm F2.8, 35mm and then depending on whether it is a "photo specific" trip - I will take the 100-400mm. Then I choose what I want to take each day / outing.
The 35 f1.4 is my favorite street photography lens, I never invested in the 2.8 lens so I stuck with f4 for the 70-200 and 16-35. I do own the 100-400. Most my interest is in hummingbirds with that lens
Depending on where you are travelling too and for what purpose will of course dictate the camera and lens choice. For me, city breaks and weekend getaways I take Sony A6600 & sigma 18-50 f2.8 contemporary, for any sports or wildlife my trusty and old canon 7dii, sigma 17 -70 contemporary, Canon ef70-300zL IS USM which is a sharp lens ! I also mostly travel with carry on luggage which Limits overall what I take with me ,..lol
I'm traveling to Madagascar in October and I'm really struggling on what lenses I should bring. I also tend to just bring as many lenses as possible which just ends up being too cumbersome, both in weight and the amount of times I end up switching lenses.
Hi Allison, Great content. What lens did you use to shot video (0:11)? And what lens would recommend for this Sony cam to shoot amazing cinematic videos but also great pictures?
For my A7IV if I’m bringing only one lens it the 50 1.2 GM but most of the time I travel with 2 lenses: 35 1.4 GM and 135 1.8 GM I don’t mind the weight when I look at the pictures
Matched with the a7IV, it surely will rival the f2.8 for IQ if not surpass. I’m sure YT will carry many comparison reviews. ISO 3200 is very clean and usable in low-light situations. For travel, the weight/size benefit will make the PZ highly popular. Given how wide these are, the question is how often f2.8 to f4.0 is really necessary for travel. Seldom,IMO. With the a7IV, the 24-104 f4.0 has had a revival in popularity.
My favorites for travel are the 16-35 f2.8 and the 24-105 f4. The 24-105 is the lens that lives on my camera most of the time. I would also include the 100-400 f4 if I know I will be shooting wildlife at a distance. Your selections validated my thoughts! I'm planning for a long-awaited African photo safari, and I think those are the three that will be in my bag. I learned the hard way a long time ago that bringing everything one owns is a royal pain in the back! Too much and too heavy! Thank you for this video!
My system is pretty much the same as yours. I'm planning a trip to the Canadian Rockies for this Fall. I'm thinking about taking two camera bodies with the 16-35mm GM, 24-70mm GM II, 70-200mm GM II, and 100-400mm GM. I'll leave the primes at home.
I happened upon this post again and thought I'd update it. I ended up just taking the 24-70 GM II and the 70-200 GM II. Most of my shots were taken with the 24-70. This year I plan to go to Vancouver and Vancouver Island. I still have the GM lenses, but just bought the 16-35 G PZ, 20-70 G, and 70-200 G II to use as travel lenses.
My travel lenses are the 24-105 f4, 35mm f1.4, and Tamron 17-28 f2.8. If it's travel where landscape is the priority and I'm getting around in a car, then i will bring the 100-400.
Almost all of those lenses are huge- not to mention the most expensive. I too get stuck on what to bring. I just went to Hawaii and I think I found the right combo for me. 24-105 f4 and 20 f1.8. I didn’t miss my other lenses at all. Currently own the 35 1.8, 50 1.8, and 85 1.8 as well. I don’t have a big need for the larger telephoto lenses but I can concur on getting every mm you can get! We drover from Seattle to the east coast and Wyoming and Montana required some zoom!
The Sony 24-105 f4 was too heavy for me. Sold it, and bought the Sigma 28-70 f2.8. I usually bring it plus the Zeiss 55mm f1.8 and one other prime: 24mm f1.4 or 90mm f2.8 prime.
Hi Allison, I personally own the Sony 16-35 f2.8 GM, the Sony 35 f1.4 GM, also own 2 Sigma lenses...(at the time they were just newer lenses than the Sony GMs) the Sigma 24-70 f2.8 Art and the Sigma 85 f1.4 Art, so what would you recommend to get, the 70-200 GM ii maybe with a teleconverter or the 100-400 GM. As a professional creator I mostly shoot my video work with zoom lenses and photograph clients with my primes. Looking for a quality zoom that can be a versatile option and be in my travel kit all the times with 2 other lenses and a drone.
I have a 24mm (for vlogging) and a 50mm (for travel portraits), but I have to say it is a pain switching between them. I honestly wanted something like a 16-50mm F2.4 or wider kinda thing. Any options on that?
Those two I have are those two new G compact lenses. They are very light weight and discrete, but I feel like they are not sharp enough, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
Thanks for video but it seems that you travel with all of the GM lens😄 I was expecting to hear about the BEST lens from your point of view not all focal length from 16mm to 400mm. By the way I suggest you to change your 16-35mm with 12-24mm then you can travel without any overlap 😜
Hello I’m john. Since i travel a lot like a backpacker. I use my 24-105 g master. And my 100-400 sigma I had the Sony 100/400 was great but way to big for traveling I’m happy with the two I just mention and get the job done. From being kissing the cobbler stone ground of old Europe to the elephant of Africa w the 100-400
Iphone for any wide stuff on my pocket, 35mm f1.4 and 85mm or 135mm for street and portraits, I also own 24-70 f2.8 which is awesome but it's kind of a boring lens to me for some reason.
Unfortunately, photography is just one of my hobbies, so I have far from unlimited funds. My 4 "must have" lenses would be the 16-35 f/2.8 GM, the 24-105 f/4 G, the 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 GM and (for astrophotography) the 14mm f/1.8 GM. This would give me from 16mm to 400mm in just 3 lenses with no gaps. Unfortunately, I only have 3 out of the 4 lenses I listed. For one of them, I ended up with a 3rd party lens due largely to my budget at the time. I might have to have a closer look at the recently announced 16-35 f/4 PZ G. I would also love it if a GM version of the 24-105 lens would be released.
Hmmm… wondering who this video is for. I mean the content is obviously tailored to the rank beginner who knows absolutely nothing about photography or camera lenses (wide angle lenses let you see wide, telephoto lenses let you zoom in, etc), but then the recommendations are for half a dozen top of the line professional lenses. 🤔
Exactly. Tons of heavy and expensive gear for sure. I guess if the main point of a trip is to document to profit from it on a RUclips video or some other content then maybe someone could justify a 5 lb camera/lens combo.
Excellent video and excellent explanation. I have an unrelated question about pronunciation. I’ve noticed that the presenter pronounces the last two or three words of each sentence in a very ‘drawn out’ manner. It’s not a criticism, just curiosity. I’d like to know from which part of the United States that accent or way of speaking comes from. English is not my native language, and I’m trying to learn and distinguish the most common accents of people in the United States. I want to clarify that I’m asking this respectfully and out of curiosity.
You call the 35mm f/1.8 "small and lightweight". You're quite mistaken. It's a chunky prime and weighs over half a kilogram (524 grams). That's not small and lightweight. What is small and lightweight is the Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA, which is only 120 grams - less than a quarter of the f/1.4 model.
There is a huge difference between a travel photographer and a traveling person who takes photos. I have in my arsenal over 10 lenses, covering a spectrum of 12-600mm inclusing several primes. On our last trip (famly) to florence, I took 12 2.8, 24-240 and the sony 20 1.8. This covers all possible spectrum, all scenarios and the 12 even has a shift adapter for architecture. Also, the GM lineup is not for everyone (to say the least). carrying almost 6lb of lenses (24-70, 16-35 + 100-400) is NOT lightweight.
Many thanks - My favourite travel lenses are 1. 28-60 2. 24-105 f4 2.8 glass is too cumbersome to carry And if I intend long then will be the 100-400 I don’t own any primes but if I had to have one then it will be the 28mm f2 !
an average of 2,000 euros for a lens plus 2,000 euros for a camera I prefer to buy a Pentax Spotmatic F with a 50/1.4 lens for 150 euros and give the remaining 3850 for negative films with 1000 rolls Ilford HP5 plus ....I can create a history
Thanks for your insights, Allison. I travel with a very similar kit: 16-35/4, 35/1.8 Macro and 70-200/4. If I’m feeling adventurous, I may substitute a 50/1.2 for the 35/1.8. Either way, with just three lenses, I find I’m ready for anything.
I just went on vacation. Most of the time I had my older 24-70 f4. I wouldnt shoot faster than f4 because I want the background not too blown out so we can show off the background. My other lens was 28 f2. Awesome for night shots and when I wanted better bokeh. I love these two for travel because they are small and light. Perfect for when Im actually on vacation. Everything else is too heavy and just becomes work. The 24-105 is awesome just too big when Im trying to enjoy nature or disneyland with my kids.
I love my 55 f1.8 zeiss….so small and has an image quality of it’s own.
For my travel I carry 3 lenses 100-400 , 24-105 and 18mm Batis.
My favorite travel lens is the 24mm f1.4 GM. I use that bad boy all the time.
nice
I watched many videos trying to figure out which lens to buy for travel. Your video is the best. You are video was concise, to the point and enjoyable to watch. Thank you for your help!
You hit the nail on the spot with every lens I have to agree with you about everything. Well done video
16-35 GM, 24-105 G, 100-400 GM. For a safari trip I’ll add the 200-600 G and 1.4x teleconverter. For night city scape I’ll add my 24mm 1.4 GM and for a botanical garden the 90mm macro G
I prefer the 24-105 on the 24-70 because of the OSS and reach, truly all around amazing lens
You're one of the most productive and valuable youtubers there are.
My favourite lenses for travel are the 16-35 F2.8 GM and the 70-200 F2.8 GM2. Using APS mode on the 16-35 I also have effectively 50mm available. For the 70-200 I also take the 2x teleconverter to give me up to 400mm for wildlife. As this is such a fast lens,that still gives F5.6 at 400, the same as the 100-400, so this is a more useful and adaptable lens.
Curious why you don't use the 2x converter with the 16-35GM instead of cropping in and losing resolution.
@@varunkamal91 maybe because it is not possible ;)
@varunkamal91 2x Tele looses aperture. Also sony's teleconverter only fits the super zoom lenes like 70 to 200 or 100 to 400.
24-105 zoom is my workhorse lens. I use it 90 percent of the time.
Same!
Same here!
Ditto. With the a7IV, it delivers. It’s a bit heavy now that I’m older/retired. The pending 16-35mm PZ with crop and electronic zoom might be perfect for travel and long walkabouts.
Ditto!
My Favourite is the Sony FE 1.8 35mm. Small light and sharp.
24-70mm 2.8 sigma + 70-200mm Sony GM ii. Done! Already preordered the 16-35 PZ, though. Hope it is somewhat as sharp as my 20mm 1.8 G.
I’ve been shooting News and Current Affairs with ENG cameras for over 30 years. Now I mostly use an FS7 and A7S3.
Lenses I use are very similar to what is in this video.
24-70F2.8 Gmaster, 70-200F4, selp18-110F4, then samyang 14 and 35mm T1.5 cine primes.
New 16-35F5PZ is on order, exporting delivery end May.
a-1 w/ 17-40f/4, 85 f1.4, 28f/2, is great for european cities/ wine country, Mediterranean coast, fits in a smallish stealth non-photo bag - 24 isn't wide enough, 35 to 70 isn't long enough, and the 85 has fantastic 3D subject isolation for portraits and short tele architectural/landscape shots with so much crispy sharpness
24-70mm + 20/14mm prime is my ultimate travel combo.
I've shot primes for most of my photographing life. Although it is a pain to change lenses, I love a 24, 50 & 105 combo. I'm not a pro photographer but splurged and have the 24mm 1.4 and 50mm 1.2 G-master lenses for my A7iii. for the 105mm I'm still using a classic Nikon-P 105mm 2.5. Im planing on a trip to New Zealand in 2023 and will for sure take the 24 & 50. I also have the Batis 85mm 1.8 so it will be a battle not to take it and maybe leave the 105mm home.
Primes are why I'm leaning toward the fuji X s-10 because of IBIS. I'm not trying to carry a gimbal.
Visited NZ last March and suggest you think about adding more reach as there are many occasions where, due to access issues, you might find the nearest positioning leaves you with too much foreground. Just a thought … it depends on your own style. Enjoy the trip - it is a very beautiful country.
I totally agree. I use a sony 35mm and a sigma 100-400 on my A6400.
OMG, yes! 16-35mm is my fav travel lens.
For just a light kit for travel, I use the Sony 20mm f1.8 g, Sigma 65mm f2 and Sigma 90mm f 2.8. Very small bag. For events, the Tamron 70-180, Tamron 28-75 g2 and Sigma 85mm f1.4. I’ve had GM lenses before and I find my current lenses give about 95% of the performance at a much lower price for those of us on a budget.
It’s not the price for me. It’s the weight.
It all depends where you are going and what are going to shoot. What I will say is that you are missing a lens that I love for travel photography - the Sony 24-240mm. Scott Kelby talked about travel zooms in a bunch of videos and it really convinced me to try one. Moment can often be the most important thing in photography - especially when travelling - and not having to change lenses can be priceless (especially when traveling with other people). You should try it :) I typically take a 16-35mm F2.8, 24-70mm F2.8, 35mm and then depending on whether it is a "photo specific" trip - I will take the 100-400mm. Then I choose what I want to take each day / outing.
I like the Tamron 28-200mm F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD Lens for Sony FE as a go-to travel lens.
The 35 f1.4 is my favorite street photography lens, I never invested in the 2.8 lens so I stuck with f4 for the 70-200 and 16-35. I do own the 100-400. Most my interest is in hummingbirds with that lens
Depending on where you are travelling too and for what purpose will of course dictate the camera and lens choice. For me, city breaks and weekend getaways I take Sony A6600 & sigma 18-50 f2.8 contemporary, for any sports or wildlife my trusty and old canon 7dii, sigma 17 -70 contemporary, Canon ef70-300zL IS USM which is a sharp lens !
I also mostly travel with carry on luggage which Limits overall what I take with me ,..lol
I will choose the 50GM for my trip. It's perfect for my girl and also includes some environment.😻
I'm traveling to Madagascar in October and I'm really struggling on what lenses I should bring. I also tend to just bring as many lenses as possible which just ends up being too cumbersome, both in weight and the amount of times I end up switching lenses.
I travel with 2 bodies, with a lens glued to each. 1st has a fuji 35mm 1.4 (50mm f/2 ff equiv) and second a 16-80mm f/4 (ff 24-120 f/6 equiv).
Very practical review by Sony. Thank you very much.
The Tamron 35-150mm F2.8 is pretty nice too, as is the Tamron 28-200 ;)
Hi Allison,
Great content. What lens did you use to shot video (0:11)?
And what lens would recommend for this Sony cam to shoot amazing cinematic videos but also great pictures?
That was really darn useful thanks.
imo, the samyang tiny lens series can't be beat for it's character and portability. I would recommend 1 zoom and 1 prime imo.
Great Video! thanks for sharing
Same kit just instead of Sony, I have Sigma-Tamron Hybrid with Sony 24-70mm f/4 'G' being the exception for gimbal usage, and it's sharp af.
Excellent presentation!
thanks a lot...very informative
Thanks for the recommendations. Those lenses all looked like full frame. I shoot A6300, Any APS C recommendations ?
This was extremely helpful 👍🏽
16-35gm is my favourite lens.
Ditto on the 16-35.for interiors and walking around.
Thanks for you share experience 👍❤️🙏
Why nobody is talking about APSC cameras? Their bodies and lenses are way lighter and perfect for traveling :)
For my A7IV if I’m bringing only one lens it the 50 1.2 GM but most of the time I travel with 2 lenses: 35 1.4 GM and 135 1.8 GM I don’t mind the weight when I look at the pictures
Thoughts on comparing imagine quality of the new 16-35mm pz f4 g vs the gm 16-35 f2.8? Thanks
Matched with the a7IV, it surely will rival the f2.8 for IQ if not surpass. I’m sure YT will carry many comparison reviews. ISO 3200 is very clean and usable in low-light situations. For travel, the weight/size benefit will make the PZ highly popular. Given how wide these are, the question is how often f2.8 to f4.0 is really necessary for travel. Seldom,IMO.
With the a7IV, the 24-104 f4.0 has had a revival in popularity.
Newer lens is always better regardless of aperture
My favorites for travel are the 16-35 f2.8 and the 24-105 f4. The 24-105 is the lens that lives on my camera most of the time. I would also include the 100-400 f4 if I know I will be shooting wildlife at a distance. Your selections validated my thoughts! I'm planning for a long-awaited African photo safari, and I think those are the three that will be in my bag. I learned the hard way a long time ago that bringing everything one owns is a royal pain in the back! Too much and too heavy! Thank you for this video!
My system is pretty much the same as yours. I'm planning a trip to the Canadian Rockies for this Fall. I'm thinking about taking two camera bodies with the 16-35mm GM, 24-70mm GM II, 70-200mm GM II, and 100-400mm GM. I'll leave the primes at home.
Nice kit
I happened upon this post again and thought I'd update it. I ended up just taking the 24-70 GM II and the 70-200 GM II. Most of my shots were taken with the 24-70. This year I plan to go to Vancouver and Vancouver Island. I still have the GM lenses, but just bought the 16-35 G PZ, 20-70 G, and 70-200 G II to use as travel lenses.
My travel lenses are the 24-105 f4, 35mm f1.4, and Tamron 17-28 f2.8. If it's travel where landscape is the priority and I'm getting around in a car, then i will bring the 100-400.
Almost all of those lenses are huge- not to mention the most expensive. I too get stuck on what to bring. I just went to Hawaii and I think I found the right combo for me. 24-105 f4 and 20 f1.8. I didn’t miss my other lenses at all. Currently own the 35 1.8, 50 1.8, and 85 1.8 as well. I don’t have a big need for the larger telephoto lenses but I can concur on getting every mm you can get! We drover from Seattle to the east coast and Wyoming and Montana required some zoom!
If I have to take only one lens for travel photography it is 24-105 f/4 G. Sony 24-70 GM is too heavy.
I use the Samyang 35mm 1.8, Sony 24 to 240mm, & the Sigma 14 to 24mm 2.8
So nice to see a woman making these videos! I was a little bit tired of seeing only guys. Great video!
Sony 20-70/F4 G and Tamron 50-400 would make an ideal combination for travel photography.
Is thats the best gear money can buy...? Wao, thanks for the video.
Great video
What about the f4 16-35 pz Sony lens?
I use the 24-105 and the Laowa 12 2.8
The Sony 24-105 f4 was too heavy for me. Sold it, and bought the Sigma 28-70 f2.8. I usually bring it plus the Zeiss 55mm f1.8 and one other prime: 24mm f1.4 or 90mm f2.8 prime.
The Zeiss 55mm is awesome...and compact
With all these lenses, is impossible to have money for travel! Very cleverer Sony ambassador 😂
is this sony PZ 18-105 f4 best or not ?
Best e-mount lenses currently: tamron
Hi Allison, I personally own the Sony 16-35 f2.8 GM, the Sony 35 f1.4 GM, also own 2 Sigma lenses...(at the time they were just newer lenses than the Sony GMs) the Sigma 24-70 f2.8 Art and the Sigma 85 f1.4 Art, so what would you recommend to get, the 70-200 GM ii maybe with a teleconverter or the 100-400 GM. As a professional creator I mostly shoot my video work with zoom lenses and photograph clients with my primes. Looking for a quality zoom that can be a versatile option and be in my travel kit all the times with 2 other lenses and a drone.
100-400 GM...wish I could afford it...eagle eye
I have a 24mm (for vlogging) and a 50mm (for travel portraits), but I have to say it is a pain switching between them. I honestly wanted something like a 16-50mm F2.4 or wider kinda thing. Any options on that?
Those two I have are those two new G compact lenses. They are very light weight and discrete, but I feel like they are not sharp enough, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
Sony are releasing at 24-50 f2.8 in a few days
Sigma 18-50 2.8 is the only lens I take away and covers almost everything
where was that mountain shot filmed at???
Why should I get the Sony a6400 instead of the Fuji X s-10? Go!
I only have a f/4 lens :(
Have all that other stuff though.
Even used though that Zeiss was pretty pricey. $350.
what about the 70 350? why is not inoculated.
What are the best lenses? Why, our most expensive ones, of course!
Best bang for your buck is the Sony G 24-105mm. Great all around lens...place to start.
Travel photography and vacation are different. Don’t get confused guys. Enjoy the time off when you can
Thanks for video but it seems that you travel with all of the GM lens😄 I was expecting to hear about the BEST lens from your point of view not all focal length from 16mm to 400mm. By the way I suggest you to change your 16-35mm with 12-24mm then you can travel without any overlap 😜
For versatile lens?
New 24-70 f2.8 GM II should be one of the best choice as well due to smaller size , lighter and shaper.
Beautiful lens...comfort and precision.
Hello I’m john. Since i travel a lot like a backpacker. I use my 24-105 g master. And my 100-400 sigma
I had the Sony 100/400 was great but way to big for traveling
I’m happy with the two I just mention and get the job done. From being kissing the cobbler stone ground of old Europe to the elephant of Africa w the 100-400
very cool
Iphone for any wide stuff on my pocket, 35mm f1.4 and 85mm or 135mm for street and portraits, I also own 24-70 f2.8 which is awesome but it's kind of a boring lens to me for some reason.
Btw, does the youtuber has her own channel? Tell me plz .I like her tone and speeches.
Unfortunately, photography is just one of my hobbies, so I have far from unlimited funds. My 4 "must have" lenses would be the 16-35 f/2.8 GM, the 24-105 f/4 G, the 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 GM and (for astrophotography) the 14mm f/1.8 GM. This would give me from 16mm to 400mm in just 3 lenses with no gaps. Unfortunately, I only have 3 out of the 4 lenses I listed. For one of them, I ended up with a 3rd party lens due largely to my budget at the time. I might have to have a closer look at the recently announced 16-35 f/4 PZ G. I would also love it if a GM version of the 24-105 lens would be released.
Sister iam from India these lens are to use all cameras
Hmmm… wondering who this video is for. I mean the content is obviously tailored to the rank beginner who knows absolutely nothing about photography or camera lenses (wide angle lenses let you see wide, telephoto lenses let you zoom in, etc), but then the recommendations are for half a dozen top of the line professional lenses. 🤔
Exactly. Tons of heavy and expensive gear for sure. I guess if the main point of a trip is to document to profit from it on a RUclips video or some other content then maybe someone could justify a 5 lb camera/lens combo.
They literally just listed their entire GM line lol. The true answer is the 35-150 Tamron probably.
I need one for theme parks, any recommendations?
Budget friendly and very capable Sony F4 24-105mm G.
28mm F2 lightweight, great lens
Nasty lens
For travel. I always only bring 16-35. 35 and 85. Sometimes i swap out the 85 for 70-200.
For the zoom holy Trinity, 24-70
GM, 70-200GM, 200-600G.
For prime, 20G, 50GM, and 135GM.
#bealpha
Why sony don't have 24-105 2.8
I love the way you deliver your speech, very knowledgeable, natural and... cute! Thanks so much for sharing your experience!
Don't make us puke
My Tamron 35-150 is by far the best single I have
how's the weight? Not tiring to carry around?
@@1209jayt not to bad, I use the 150-500 and that get heavy but I carry a monopod all the time
@@mattwruff thanks for the info.
Excellent video and excellent explanation. I have an unrelated question about pronunciation. I’ve noticed that the presenter pronounces the last two or three words of each sentence in a very ‘drawn out’ manner. It’s not a criticism, just curiosity. I’d like to know from which part of the United States that accent or way of speaking comes from. English is not my native language, and I’m trying to learn and distinguish the most common accents of people in the United States. I want to clarify that I’m asking this respectfully and out of curiosity.
The best travel lens is the lens that travels with me. My little friend
24-105mm all the way ! Super versatile
My fav by far.
But I use 24-70mm f2.8 g lens feel too heavy 😅 I don’t used Sony anymore and Switch to Fujifilm GFX 50 S ii and kit lens feel is better then Sony 👍👍👍
Must have lenses when traveling = small enough to fit in a bag, affordable unlike G lenses.
Sal 16-50 2.8 + a77. And rx100. For travel - it's enough.
You call the 35mm f/1.8 "small and lightweight". You're quite mistaken. It's a chunky prime and weighs over half a kilogram (524 grams). That's not small and lightweight. What is small and lightweight is the Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA, which is only 120 grams - less than a quarter of the f/1.4 model.
Would be super nice to finally have the 24-70 GM mk2 😎 like half size and weight
Defies physics.
also the 16-35 lol
Vocal frying reaching new heights
There is a huge difference between a travel photographer and a traveling person who takes photos. I have in my arsenal over 10 lenses, covering a spectrum of 12-600mm inclusing several primes.
On our last trip (famly) to florence, I took 12 2.8, 24-240 and the sony 20 1.8. This covers all possible spectrum, all scenarios and the 12 even has a shift adapter for architecture.
Also, the GM lineup is not for everyone (to say the least). carrying almost 6lb of lenses (24-70, 16-35 + 100-400) is NOT lightweight.
I was in Florence in August last year, absolutely love that city!
also is very risky to take expensive lenses to make tourism
nice send me the a7IV and the 24-70 G master
Many thanks -
My favourite travel lenses are
1. 28-60
2. 24-105 f4
2.8 glass is too cumbersome to carry
And if I intend long then will be the 100-400
I don’t own any primes but if I had to have one then it will be the 28mm f2 !
an average of 2,000 euros for a lens plus 2,000 euros for a camera
I prefer to buy a Pentax Spotmatic F with a 50/1.4 lens for 150 euros and give the remaining 3850 for negative films
with 1000 rolls Ilford HP5 plus ....I can create a history
Batis 25 + zeiss 55. Done
Is this just a G Master ad?