This video was flagged as inappropriate or offensive because it goes against what “mainstream history” has to say on the topic lol your a kitty kat if this video offends you
I wonder why the allies do not declare war on USSR also for invading Poland with Germany ....French /British focused only on half of the two transgressors and I honestly have never found the answer to why that went that way both politically and Strategically??? Any suggestions out there.?. Plz ✌️🙏
Because that is what they wanted. These are very good videos in the causes of WWII. You should check out TIK history channel, he has the very best researched content. Look at what this guy says about Churchill. They wanted this war.
One reason was that Britain and France had guaranteed the protection of Poland only from Germany and not from USSR. Britain and France didn't know about the Secret Plan between Ribbentrop and Stalin about the division of Poland. Anyway, the Allies could not defeat both Germany and Russia. Therefore, they declared war only on Germany. Germany was also the most dangerous and the deadliest enemy of both France and Britain. The Allies were hoping the USSR would attack Germany if the war dragged down several years (which Stalin had plans for an attack on Germany in 1942 or 1943) but Hitler in 1941 beat Stalin to the punch.
They don't go in to it because the first 2 or 3 partitions are done by countries they wish to portray as "victims of aggression" (Russia and Hapsburg Austria). They also forget that Poland participated in the final break up of Czechoslovakia by annexing Teschen from them.
doesn't matter whether the Germans were the good guys or bad guys but they sure did produce some of the most melodious war songs of all time. does anyone else feels so?
123slither Surely you're not gonna tell me what they "taught" ya in the pubic schools wasn't propaganda.? You've been ingesting and regurgitating it for so long you don't know the difference.
tekmekster: You got that right..,. USA never signed nor was part of the Treaty of Versailles. This Nazi ass kissers are trying to put USA as the aggressor when Hitler declared war on us and not the other way around. They talk about the Red Army raping women in Berlin but don't mention all the women and children they raped in all the occupied countries they invaded. They started the bombing with their famous blitzkrieg and are crying when they got bombed the same way. They cried for the rapes by the red army but were laughing when in the Soviet Union they doing the same and killing people in mass. Needless to say about the ones they killed in concentration camps.
Gilded Alliance well there is he said she said and then there is the truth. He said she said are two different things. I believe Mudvayne said there are two sides to every story and 3 when the truth gets told so hurry up and grab your spoon before your soup gets cold. They lost me with that last part...
Thanks for putting this up Vasile Before anyone pours out their vitriol please note this is VERSION TWO and needs to be seen in perspective If as this presentation suggests the british government encouraged poland, promising support right up to the brink of war when there was no plan to actually intervene, then this was a cynical manipulative betrayal.
Emilka PLater WW 2 was started because of the decades long hatred between Germany and Britain. That hatred exists today hence Brexit. The British will never trust the Germans and any rise to power they may endure. Never!!! That co equal distrust is what caused WW 2 and will continue forever
(Nearly every comment on this page) Stongly worded, sarcastic, uninformed comment, aimed at sharing my strong feelings about something i really dont know anything about, because i had a skewed, biased, agendized, bit of 1 sided education on the subject while i was at a very malleable age.
And you got that from a 76 minute documentary?? Do you have any background information which could tell you that this is at all objective, as you say?? You must be easily influenced by video content! The only way to truly grasp what happened from 1929-1945, and to be able to determine the relative objectivity of a documentary, is to read a whole lot of books, which I’ve been doing for more than 30 years. And new archives keeps coming to light, especially from the old Soviet Union, so there is always another stack of excellent books to read. For example, to write the newest, most informative new book on Adolf Eichmann, *author Bettina Stangneth read more than 700 books, in addition to all of the archives she poured through, as well as every moment of his trial in Jerusalem!* most of the trial is even available here on RUclips! Reading books, of course, takes effort, which most people today aren’t willing to exert, so they watch a few documentaries on RUclips-without even knowing whether or not the content is at all accurate-and are suddenly geniuses about WWII!!
It’s pretty clear the Soviet Union was setting up to attack Europe. They annexed Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and attacked Finland. The NKVD files prove the Soviet Union was planning a massive invasion into Europe (Soviet document 103202-06)
Yigit Uysal thank you for your positive comments. However, polish soldiers were fighting tanks with horses is just a communist ( and fascist ) propaganda. Don’t believe these liars.
PolskaWalczaca why shall they do that? Its against the main idea of propaganda. Cause it does not show your opponent weak, but credits them with bravery and masculanity. On the other end, I read and watch these, in allied documentaries and books. By the way, r u polish? That took my attention.
During the "phoney war" when the UK sent the first expeditionary force into France Germany herded the entire compliment to Dunkirk where Germany had troops that could have easily destroyed them but let them leave. Seems more like a warning to the UK to"mind their own business" and calculated to simply keep the UK out of continental affairs.
Because Hitler never wanted war with the West. All that Hitler wanted, is reunite Germany and take back lands lost after WW1. Plus, Russian lands... So, He declare war on Poland, but did not expect that France and Britain will declare war on him. Just look at the events after Poland. Britain and France did nothing, you had the phoney war. Then Britain state that they will send troops to Norway, to cut Germany supplies of ore, and Hitler just take it before. Then he invade France, that declare war to them, and also, leave all Army to go back in England from Dunkerqe, in hope they will sign peace. But Churchill never wanted peace. He knew that Germany is very low on fuel, and only hope for them is to surrender, or try to get oil from Russia. And Stalin already started to demand huge price for oil. So, Churchill, buy not signing peace with Germany, put Hitler in war with Russia. Why Battle of Britain? For Britain, war for Britain, and for Germany, for trying to make them sign peace, that Hitler so desperately wanted... And he was very angry when he realized that they dont want peace, so he started to make drastic moves... He even send his second man, Rudolph Hess, to try to convince them to sign peace. He should get Nobel prize for his efforts...
General Poslije Bitke not to mention he was drip-feeding false intelligence to both the Nazis and the Soviets that the other was planning an imminent invasion. Get the two biggest Kids on the Block to fight and then take out the winner after he's been tired out. It's a story as old as time itself
Looking through Churchill's eyes, all he have to do is open more fronts for Germans after realizing there will be no invasion of England, like in Africa, which was English main front and German secondary, help Russians to get Germans out of Caucasus, and push USA in war. The Germans definitely lost war in Stalingrad. But even if they did take Caucasus, it would take them another year to repair, start producing and transporting oil... So...
British secret communiques in Nov 1941 were aware of the Japanese pearl harbour mission but never informed the US gov't. They needed the US in the war.
@34:00... Stalin was, after all, a Bank Robber. I was not aware of the Polish Attacks on German Speaking Poles. "Sanitized" Version portrays Poles as Primitive Inepts. This is no way ignores the Nazi & Soviet intent to capture Poland. It does "complicate" the Narrative, as England wanted War as the End Game to preserve their fading Empire.
@@DaveSCameron You really believe UK fought Germany for moral reasons? if you do you are hopelessly naive my friend. Churchill fought to preserve the British Empire. But he was a deluded drunk who thought USA would allow Britain to retain her empire. Churchill was a sucker.
This is a nice timeline with lots of detail, but you have to read the books. And you have to understand the history of this history, the 19th Century and the demise of Royalty, the industrial revolution, and the new technology of war making after the US Civil War. Aircraft changed everything, as did radio and the submarine. What caused the war was the resort to military force to enforce a philosophy of national dominance, which sounds stupid/obvious, but in fact Germany could have done better by simply becoming the great engineering & manufacturing power it is today and not attacking anyone after Munich. Cultural superiority by itself is just peculiarity, until you start to move armies into other nations. The philosophy of large scale violence was acceptable to the Germans, Hitler was molded in WW1.
it wasn't just acceptable to Germans but to everyone, there were no hippies in 1939 and still today it's in the nature of states to wage wars for power and dominance, it's unavoidable, there might be extended periods of peace but due to shifts in power eventual return to the natural state of war will always follow to establish a new equilibrium.
Hopefully people can listen to this with an open mind, as opposed to only siding with the interpretation of the victors. Not everything that it suggests may be true but it is still worth analyzing the other sides perspective, if not then you have no credibility on this topic. Just remember, there are no good guys and bad guys in war. Every side of a conflict is responsible, something that the victors will never accept and something the media does not want the masses to understand.
In the simplest terms...sometimes very, very bad people, who do lots of bad things, sometimes do some good things. This does not make them good people.
@@joqqeman Indeed yes just try any main historical channel on this platform and click on the Playlist, from here in England you'll discover the censorship with up to 80% of them verboten, makes one wonder what you war of freedom was necessary for..
From around 8:53 mins Not entirely correct. The Allies also downscale their armed forces, for example the Washington Naval Treaty, or the significant reductions in the strengths of the various air forces. None, however even close to the 100,000 imposed onto Germany though, so that part is correct.
I have not reached it yet but I am looking forward to how the author of this glosses over / excuses Hitler's annexation of the whole of Czechoslovakia.
Rodger Stone After he learned the soviet government was trying to force the Czech president to open Czechoslovakia to the red army he took control of the whole country. Quite a reasonable course of action that was explained in this vid.
@@Horsemanray Lmao Holland is the most justifiable one along with Norway because the British were literally on their way to invade in plan R4 to annex the iron ore and resources, the Norwegian priminister literally invited the Germans in to prevent his country being a war zone. Holland was part of that strategic occultation and was necessary land for fighting against Britain who refused all offers of peace from Germany. The UK also invaded Iceland at this time, it’s just how war works
You have to add to the fact that yes there is 2 side to the story but usually the real truth lies in between the stories given by each side, so with that said the best thing to do if you want the full truth is to get both sides of the story and use any evidence to see where the truth...
Lol the Germans got chewed up and spit out in the end, only people who seem more proud of losing are the confederate traitors here in the US . Glory “wished” is all you have because actual glory did not occur for anyone in the German side unless it was in death, and they ultimately bowed down to the world for the second time in a couple decades. Their so-called leaders offed themselves or ran from their punishment like cowards until many got hunted down like dogs. Glory? 🤣 no wonder you live where you live, and I say that as someone who’s very critical of my own country.
+Michael RedCrow I agree. The points you addressed are utterly unacceptable behavior for a modern state. Sadly though, we have to accept that the causes of WW2 have nothing to do with the atrocities and crimes you mentioned. As a general truth, countries can get away with quite a lot (even ALL the things you mention); as long as they stick to their own borders. This is true even today. Even today, any of the things you mentioned, is generally not a cause for an outside power to use as a reason to intervene. As much as all decent people would want this to be true -- it is not. Countries don't have friends, only interests. WW2 was triggered when Germany invaded Poland, but the CAUSES are far more complicated. The main cause of WW2 was the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact in 1939. The secret protocol was the real reason it was signed in the first place. The secret protocol was a division of East Europe into spheres of interest, and Stalin greedily accepted. He greedily accepted, since his negotiations with the west had turned out to be fruitless, and making a deal with Hitler meant that he could have Finland, Eastern Poland, the Baltic States and Moldavia (from Romania). Stalin knew perfectly well that signing it would leave him with a future common border with Nazi Germany. He did it anyway. He did it voluntarily, no duress, no force applied from outside. The Non-aggression part was merely a pretext, since both dictators signatures weren't worth the ink it was written with. The pact between two mass murderers enabled everything which followed after that, and was therefore the main reason which allowed Hitler to invade Poland, AND Stalin to attack the Balkan States, Poland, and Finland. Kinda embarrassing, having an 'ally' Stalin, aka the 'cute Uncle Joe', which caused WW2., which is why most mainstream historians ignore it. What is your opinion of the role of the nonaggression pact between the two dictators, and the role it played in causing the war?
Michael RedCrow I think we can certainly agree on many things. Your comment was practically the same as I would have written myself. Of course, it would have been foolish for GB and France to declare war on the SU in 1939, since that would (most likely) have resulted in an (at least temporary) full alliance between Hitler and Stalin. Thank God that it turned out to be the lesser evil of any number of bad choices :-) You are entirely correct though. We should not forget the millions of victims in Eastern Europe, who suffered fifty years of communist oppression as a result.
+Michael RedCrow Well said mate. I agree also, thanks for saying it so clearly. I'm reading "the Third Reich in Power" by Richard J. Evans. Hitler was as Catholic as I am the Pope. And how they treated the Seventh Day Adventists who were a threat to on one is just pitiful.
Hans Neumann You should maybe use words like 'some' or ' many' to clarify your statement. The only Czechs who fought openly against the Central Powers, were ex-POWs in the Czech Brigade (around 50,000 if I remember correctly). Others fought in the Austrian-Hungarian army, on the side of the Central Powers. Politically, there were nationalists who wanted independence, who lived in Paris.
I love the way they seem to have forgotten the Nazi-Soviet Nonagrresion Pact of August 1939. I can see how this little item would provide a glitch in the nutty story. And don't those lovely German songs just send a thrill through your system?
The non aggression pact was nullified when the Soviet Union annexed Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and attacked Finland. It was inevitable they were gonna invade Europe as NKVD archives now prove....Germany took preemptive action
How incredibly refreshing for a near Axis/German documentary viewed upload to appear! How did these erstwhile treasonous opinions ( facts!) evade censorship? Best wishes from a freedom seeking Englishman.
Every single thing in all three parts of this series is commonly available in many books. So your surprise is nothing but naivete on your part. You can find 2500 books on this period in a big library, do you think this simple RUclips has anything new? Where do you suppose this author got his info?
@@johnsmith1474 Hah hah! Ok I accept your higher class education but please spare a thought for us comprehensive state educated individuals who require at least a decade to undo the bias before using our spare time to educate ourselves. Best wishes 🙏
@@DaveSCameron - Ha ha talk about arrogant & condescending your whole fucking nation is 500 years of arrogance on steroids. Get the hell out of Ireland! Good heath to you!
WWII started by Munich agreement in 1938. Nazi Germany signed agreement with western countries to start WWII. Poland was involved indirectly. Ambassador Lukashevich discussed with French government and got approval to invade Chehoslowakia. USSR unfortunately did not help Chehoslowakian brothers to retain independence from rude Polish invasion!
This documentary took +1 hour and 16 minutes to say, “Germany”??? Germany started WWII! With Japan in the east, of course. I think this documentary needs a new title, lol!
no matter who started the war, it was the blood British who changed this conflict between them and Germany(their old enemy) into a world war by forcefully bringing the oppressed colonial people into the battlefield , when their plans failed miserably in the battlefield. the Americas always helped the Brits to get monetary benefits.The later was never forced into the war , they waged it (indirectly by their actions) and fuelled it
+Ghost Perry US policy i n the issue you mentioned cannot see seen separately.At that same time they were actively helping the allies in European war(in reality) although they kept on saying that they have nothing to do with war in Europe.
Another strike..The narrator says that in March 1939 Poland, Reinstag (or watever it's called) Brunning meets with Churchill and proposed to avoid a military confrontation with Germany he was brushed off by Churchill that said that he wanted the German economy completedly smashed.. That is another strike a big one for Winston Churchill was not even in the picture yet...Churchill became Prime Minister of the U.K. on May 10th 1940 and had no power at that time to have meetings neither the less to enter negotiations with either Germany or Poland...talking about propaganda
You sure of yourself he was lord of the admiralty so thats a strike against you and yes brunning was in exile in london strike 2 and strike 3 who do you think was in charge of the norway operation hum hum..... CHURCHILL and what happened there you really need a history lesson next youll tell me he just annexed Czechoslovakia ill wait for your answer but wont hold my breath i gave you an extra at bat but it wont help your uneducated ass lmfao
It didn't say he "met with Churchill '. It says he met with the foreign ministry. Also Churchill was to "in the picture". He was very much in the picture at that time. He was a member of parliament, and then at the start of the war, Lord of the Admiralty, then Prime Minister. You should pay closer attention,and get the facts straight before you call bullshit, on the video!!
Also the guy who you say "met with Churchill", was a former member of the Polish government and was living in exile in London. So he wasnt negotiating for anyone.
In this version you hear a tale of how Germany was encouraged to go to was by the western Allies being bulligerent. Its a prospective that adds value to understanding WW2, though its not wholely acceptable to me. Nowhere in this version does the Jewish murders get attention.
The provocation is parallel comparing Polish aggressions with French,Check and sometimes British backing ..It almost Hitler just joined the club finally....not that German semetics we're ok....but I see Polish beating up Germans and barring get.an business in the lead up ...amongst many other ....
Wait I don't understand...or maybe I missed it in the video, but from my knowledge,Germany later invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia. Why did they do that? Wasn't Hitler just asking for the Sudetenland? And to me the killing of his people has no relation to starting the war, but I may be wrong. The only thing I could think of would be to make Hitlers genocide of the Jews seem ..... Less bad...... Just my two cents though
SeanChaos117 Because the people in eastern Czechoslovakia (Slovakia) wanted greater autonomy and allegedly asked Germany for help. So, Slovakia became a German protectorate and the rest of Czechoslovakia was occupied by invitation (apparently). In short, after being forced to give up the Sudetenland to Germany (and their defensive line along with it) they were unable to resist.
SeanChaos117 WW2 for Germany wasn't ever just about getting that parts with strong German majority or even minority. It was about forming a lasting monoethnical and cultural empire. Same situation that you've described about Czechoslovakia happened with Poland - Hitler supposedly wanted to make a smaller Polish state but GB and France didn't let him? Well, it was within his power to make a puppet state like Vichy for serious political and military gains (Polish units against USSR), but it wasn't fitting Great Germany narrative. It was better to exterminate undesirables.
SeanChaos117 We all know what was REALLY going on back then - A Struggle for dominance and jostling for position in World Trade/Routes, Military, Resources and Space/land... Same eternal struggle that has being fought since beginning of Man.. Suez Canal and Panama Canals were both diplomatically negotiated over unsuccessfully so the Interested Empires invaded and Took control of them from the Host countries - that's just a tiny example what played out in WW1, WW2 and TODAY in every War around the Globe.. There is no Good side or Bad side ALL sides are the same.. Japan and America were also involved in a similar but separate squabble of their own at the same time...
arek314 Hitler and the Third Reich was a strong bulwark against Soviet communism. Stalin nd Churchill were more responsible for the war than a Germany trying to re-unite after the crushing terms of Versaiilles. Barbarossa was a pre-emptive strike against Stalin who was very busy staging his armies at the German border. It was obvious he planned to invade western Europe.
If Hitler needed bulwark against USSR why had Germany acted so aggressively against Poland? Up until mid 1930' German-Polish relationship were ok (save for occasional trade disagreement) and Polish-USSR were very hostile. You don't set a bulwark against someone by knocking your probable ally first.
Watched the first one but I wont be watching this. I love alternative views of conflicts but the commentator made a serious factual error in the first two minutes. Good stuff anyway Vasile.
eatenbytheweasel It claims that it was the remnants of the treaty of versaille that blocked peace in europe by August 1939. That treaty had already been broken several times and proved to not be in effect, both by the violations of the germans and the unresponsiveness of the former allies who where to inforce it. Then you have the czechs after Hitler signed a new treaty not to demand or annex more territory after the sudetenland. Mutch of the territory lost to the poles where after all held by referendums after the end of the war and the majority ruled with exception of Katowice. The fact remains that Germany lost world war one and should as the tradition implies cede territory. To then demand the old imperial borders along with the sudetenland and the czechs is really going way to far. Last but not least, Hitler had already signed the molotov ribbentrop pact, ensuring the destruction of Poland and a division of eastern europe between the axies and the soviets. PS: It starts with a speech of Hitler, probably after the defeat of France. About the allies refusal to negotiate and their warmongering policies. Not very partial start right there. I want to see the German viewpoint but most of all I dont want propoganda, angled views or events in the wrong order. I hope thats enough.
eatenbytheweasel You are of course entitled to your opinion. But you asked and I gave you an answer. I certainly hope however that you dont think that Hitler was a great guy just for trying to rectify the injustice of versaille.
I am going to add my comments as I watch this. First off and I am only to 13.08 it stated Germany disarmed according to the treaty of Versailles this is true on the other hand it said France, Britain, and the United States did not disarm. Which is blatantly false. The Navies of the U.S., Britain, and France were limited by the Washington treaty of 1920 in which there was a moratorium on new construction capitol ship. The U.S. Drastically drew down the Army and Marines. Trying to state otherwise is blatantly false.
Thats not what the numbers shows. In 1939 the British had 15 battleships and France had 7, while Germany had only 1. Also the german navy until 1935 were totally destroyed. Did this happened with the British Navy? Also Germany were forbidden to have an Air Force. Did the Royal Air Force and French Air Force were forbidden? Until 1935 Germany were forbidden to have more than 100.000 men in the army. Even after Hitler restored the army and the compulsory draft in 1935, the French army were still the double size of the german army in 1939. If you compares germans army size with the rest of Europe in 1939, including USSR and British you will a proportion of 1/97. Germany also had an inferior number in therms of tanks and aircraft. A comparison of Germany and USSR in numbers of these equipaments, USSR had the advantage of 10/1. And i didnt even mentioned the army, navy and equipaments of the US.
The U.S took soldiers off payroll as the did not need that large of peace time force.U.S also got rid of all obsolete wood vessels burnt them to waterline off shore of charles county MD.20 miles south of D.C .This being said this down grade was to modernize arm forces more than anything
USA did not even signed the Treaty..There are many lies here but I want to ponder that one. USA was not involved at all in any of Europe's machinations. USA entered WW1 after Germany not only bombed an American civilian ship but also sent a letter to the them President of Mexico asking help in the war and in return Germany was going to wage war on USA to help Mexico get back the territories in USA power. (that's when USA entered WW1)but never at the end of the war engaged in any of the Pacts and treaties signed.. In fact USA was again'st the treaty of versailles and tried to help Germany at that time. USA was even sending money to Germany as relief for the treaty of versailles. Money that Hitler used to create his army of thugs. Germany with it's whining about the hardship of the Treaty never got to honor it, other countries took pity on Germany and allied to help. . Finally, Hitler declared war on USA not the other way around. Nazi ass kissers are trying to change the history of WW2 but it does not match. Hitler was a criminal and at the end his army of thugs, looters, rapist and murderers got what they deserved alone with him.... Next
Not true. You don’t know enough. Please research. Too much to explain to you about FDR And his machinations along with Churchill and the usual suspects
Why didn’t France and the UK never declare war on the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland? Why Germany only? After Poland Stalin later on invaded the three small baltic states and after accomplishing that went on to invade Finland. Why were they silent about Stalin’s aggression when in fact Stalin and hitler had signed a treaty that clearly divided the spoils between them. The truth is that hitler was the only one to have the balls to take on Stalin even though he had a country that dwarfed that of hitlers. France the UK and later on the US were scared shit of the Soviet Union and all they managed to do was gang up on countries that were smaller to them. So they picked on Germany Italy and Japan but turned a blind eye to the biggest bully in the campus.
Yes. Churchill stay aside, cause he knew, that his embargo on oil on Hitler, will push Hitler at war with Russia... Cause, ether will Germany buy oil from Russia, for which Russia demand huge industrial payment, or will try, what Britain hoped, to take it by force...
I really hate the stupid clip: History is written by the victors. Not so. History is written by historians. Many of the best, most highly regarded accounts of WWII were written by Germans.
Stalin's was industrializing Russia. When Hitler invaded he caught Stalin with his pants down for Stalin started the preparation of tanks after he read Mein Kampf in which Hitler's wote that he was going to attack the Soviet Union. When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union only 28 t-34 tanks were made. Hitler took over the Ukraine and with it the steel factories making it impossible for Stalin to continue the fabrication of tanks. Stalin then moved the rest of his factories to the Ural mountains and with assistance of Great Britain, Canada and Australia that supplied him with steel, and tanks, (British tanks) planes etc..Hitler was able to advance into the Soviet Union because Stalin was not prepared nor had the right equipment to fight Hitler. In the battle of Berlin old tanks from the U.K and old planes from WW1 were used for the defense of Moscow. Later when USA entered the war the Soviet Ubion received lend lease among that steel, zinc, iron, ore, airplanes tanks, you name it.. with the steel Stalin was able to produce more t-34's and more advance weapons like the Katuscha ( or something like that) This is another propaganda lie... Stalin was not going to attack Germany. Great Britain told Stalin that Hitler was going to attack and Stalin disregarded the U.K thinking that they just wanted to create problems so that he could enter into the war. Russia fought WW2 because Hitler invaded the Soviet Union like he said he was going to do in his book Mein Kampf.
the Soviets did the same. my favorite part was people like kietel and kaltenbrunner and others dancing at the end of a rope. hitler declared war on the u.s. and the Soviet union. he was furious when france declared war on Germany. Kinda reap what you sew
Yes, these things happened but; Hitler had already taken Czechoslovakia and pulled a fast one in Austria. How much trust did Britain and France have for Germany? How much trust did the Poles have for Hitler?
Nobody trusted anyway in Europe in the 19th Century, or the first half of the 20th Century. It was all saber rattling and military build up, with treaty alliances and horse trading. Trust was not part of the process. You made a deal on power and threats.
Do find the number of 98% just a little suspicious? Do you believe everything your told? Do you understand who ran that vote? When was the last time you cracked a book?
Actually though as I live in the US I put up with views that I don’t agree with. I think that Mein Kampf, The Communist Manifesto, The Bible and other works of fiction should be available for anyone. It’s this thing we have about freedom of speech and the press. We have a lot of freedoms that those who were terrorized under National Socialism from 1933 to 1945 in Germany didn’t have. The abuse of these freedoms are what the Nazis used to discredit the Weimar Republic and oversee its ultimate demise and the demise of democracy in Germany. Is Bolshevism any better? If so then not by much. Arguing which one is the greater evil is like choosing your method of execution. Do you want the French guillotine or the German axe?
You've picked a side, and without looking any further than what you've been taught in school, stick to that side. Your society demands it. But notice how the German version of things goes much deeper than the Allied. It makes me wonder who's telling the truth. Still, history is written by the victors, is it not? And as long as you blindly accept their version of things without hearing both sides, you are nothing more than their lapdog
More like sceptics that questions the story that has been drilled into our heads for 70-80 years. I encourage such behaviour. We should never stop questioning history as there is always something we can learn.
No history is written by hisroians and tehre are mnay fine Germans historians who ahve written history. What a stupid slogan " History is written by the victor."
I viewed this as an amusing and curious bit of pro-Hitler propaganda and had to wonder where and when it first aired, until I shut it off at the 1:03:53 mark. "50 cruisers"? This wasn't written by the victors *or* the losers. It was written in ignorance.
read mine kampf, its straight from the horse's ass, then watch Nuremburg trials. anyways, thanks for the doc! needed a good laugh, in the end its admitted, Germany started it.
You really need a history lesson go watch tgsnt or listen to hitlers revolution then get back to me and oh yeah what about leon degrelle ?? Was he evil too ??just asking haha lmfao peep like you are the problem with history sheep
There is a lot of information in this documentary that I have never heard before. Very interesting information indeed.
Me too. I never knew Poland was aggressive towards Germany before ww2
This video was flagged as inappropriate or offensive because it goes against what “mainstream history” has to say on the topic lol your a kitty kat if this video offends you
I wonder why the allies do not declare war on USSR also for invading Poland with Germany ....French /British focused only on half of the two transgressors and I honestly have never found the answer to why that went that way both politically and Strategically???
Any suggestions out there.?. Plz
✌️🙏
Because that is what they wanted. These are very good videos in the causes of WWII. You should check out TIK history channel, he has the very best researched content. Look at what this guy says about Churchill. They wanted this war.
There is no answer except for hypocrisy. So many lies have been fed ro us, and you are a bad person if you question any of them.
One reason was that Britain and France had guaranteed the protection of Poland only from Germany and not from USSR. Britain and France didn't know about the Secret Plan between Ribbentrop and Stalin about the division of Poland. Anyway, the Allies could not defeat both Germany and Russia. Therefore, they declared war only on Germany. Germany was also the most dangerous and the deadliest enemy of both France and Britain. The Allies were hoping the USSR would attack Germany if the war dragged down several years (which Stalin had plans for an attack on Germany in 1942 or 1943) but Hitler in 1941 beat Stalin to the punch.
WW2 was Man vs. Evil and Man lost
0:30 CHURCHILL SAID.
WE NEED A LONG WAR.
Sadly yes..
If Poland being divided in 1939, is a great crime, why do documentaries never reveal how many times that happened before 1939?
They don't go in to it because the first 2 or 3 partitions are done by countries they wish to portray as "victims of aggression" (Russia and Hapsburg Austria). They also forget that Poland participated in the final break up of Czechoslovakia by annexing Teschen from them.
doesn't matter whether the Germans were the good guys or bad guys but they sure did produce some of the most melodious war songs of all time. does anyone else feels so?
it's those trumpets man, groovy
I have to agree.
Panzerlied
Great video
History is always written by the victor
Red King and a biased version of history.
123slither Surely you're not gonna tell me what they "taught" ya in the pubic schools wasn't propaganda.? You've been ingesting and regurgitating it for so long you don't know the difference.
Red King That's why they call it "His story".
+Red King this video is clearly claiming to be telling history by loser....
which is full of bull-crap.
tekmekster: You got that right..,. USA never signed nor was part of the Treaty of Versailles. This Nazi ass kissers are trying to put USA as the aggressor when Hitler declared war on us and not the other way around. They talk about the Red Army raping women in Berlin but don't mention all the women and children they raped in all the occupied countries they invaded. They started the bombing with their famous blitzkrieg and are crying when they got bombed the same way. They cried for the rapes by the red army but were laughing when in the Soviet Union they doing the same and killing people in mass. Needless to say about the ones they killed in concentration camps.
There are 3 sides to every story. One side, the other side and the truth...
ryan case yup there is 3 sides to a story
ryan case wouldnt the truth be within one of the sides?? Am I missing something here??
Gilded Alliance well there is he said she said and then there is the truth. He said she said are two different things. I believe Mudvayne said there are two sides to every story and 3 when the truth gets told so hurry up and grab your spoon before your soup gets cold. They lost me with that last part...
@@anonymousli4204 Mudvayne? As in the band?
Strange - truthful video and still on youtube? I'm surprised...
Тимофей Мочулов ☆ YT placed an Advisory Notice so you don't need to do more than click.
So Convenient!
Thanks for showing the TRUTH 👍🏻
Thanks for putting this up Vasile
Before anyone pours out their vitriol please note this is VERSION TWO and needs to be seen in perspective
If as this presentation suggests the british government encouraged poland, promising support right up to the brink of war when there was no plan to actually intervene, then this was a cynical manipulative betrayal.
CYNICAL AND MANIPULATIVE IS THIS TWISTED VERSION OF WHAT AND WHO STARTED WW2.
Emilka PLater WW 2 was started because of the decades long hatred between Germany and Britain. That hatred exists today hence Brexit. The British will never trust the Germans and any rise to power they may endure. Never!!! That co equal distrust is what caused WW 2 and will continue forever
(Nearly every comment on this page) Stongly worded, sarcastic, uninformed comment, aimed at sharing my strong feelings about something i really dont know anything about, because i had a skewed, biased, agendized, bit of 1 sided education on the subject while i was at a very malleable age.
Welcome to youtube Sir.
(Great comment - 100% true)
It is good to hear a different perspective of our parts in the war, we all contributed to its ultimate downfall.
And you got that from a 76 minute documentary?? Do you have any background information which could tell you that this is at all objective, as you say?? You must be easily influenced by video content! The only way to truly grasp what happened from 1929-1945, and to be able to determine the relative objectivity of a documentary, is to read a whole lot of books, which I’ve been doing for more than 30 years. And new archives keeps coming to light, especially from the old Soviet Union, so there is always another stack of excellent books to read. For example, to write the newest, most informative new book on Adolf Eichmann, *author Bettina Stangneth read more than 700 books, in addition to all of the archives she poured through, as well as every moment of his trial in Jerusalem!* most of the trial is even available here on RUclips! Reading books, of course, takes effort, which most people today aren’t willing to exert, so they watch a few documentaries on RUclips-without even knowing whether or not the content is at all accurate-and are suddenly geniuses about WWII!!
@@voraciousreader3341 it's not objective, it's biased from the German side, maybe a different perspective would have been a better choice of words.
Never knew Hitler's peace proposals so I am stunned. But it is still fuzzy about Soviet intentions to invade.
It’s pretty clear the Soviet Union was setting up to attack Europe. They annexed Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and attacked Finland. The NKVD files prove the Soviet Union was planning a massive invasion into Europe (Soviet document 103202-06)
soviets .
not soviet.
marxist leninists zionites.
hitler mom.
Go watch tgsnt or listen to hitlers revolution by richard tedor
German 1 Sep 39 and Russian 17 Sep 39
Invaded Poland
JONH STOWSKY great polish soldiers have fought against both without any fear. Horses against tanks. RIP, brave polish soldiers.
Yigit Uysal thank you for your positive comments. However, polish soldiers were fighting tanks with horses is just a communist ( and fascist ) propaganda. Don’t believe these liars.
PolskaWalczaca why shall they do that? Its against the main idea of propaganda. Cause it does not show your opponent weak, but credits them with bravery and masculanity. On the other end, I read and watch these, in allied documentaries and books. By the way, r u polish? That took my attention.
Yigit Uysal 100% Polish. However, there is more to this story than meets the eye. Read up on use and tactics:
polish anti tank rifle
@@yigituysal435 the horses against tanks story is a myth. The Poles weren’t stupid they dismounted you take on the Nazis and fought them on foot
Thank u
Thanks for this amazing video.
This second video is much closer to what really happend.
During the "phoney war" when the UK sent the first expeditionary force into France Germany herded the entire compliment to Dunkirk where Germany had troops that could have easily destroyed them but let them leave. Seems more like a warning to the UK to"mind their own business" and calculated to simply keep the UK out of continental affairs.
Because Hitler never wanted war with the West. All that Hitler wanted, is reunite Germany and take back lands lost after WW1. Plus, Russian lands... So, He declare war on Poland, but did not expect that France and Britain will declare war on him. Just look at the events after Poland. Britain and France did nothing, you had the phoney war. Then Britain state that they will send troops to Norway, to cut Germany supplies of ore, and Hitler just take it before. Then he invade France, that declare war to them, and also, leave all Army to go back in England from Dunkerqe, in hope they will sign peace. But Churchill never wanted peace. He knew that Germany is very low on fuel, and only hope for them is to surrender, or try to get oil from Russia. And Stalin already started to demand huge price for oil. So, Churchill, buy not signing peace with Germany, put Hitler in war with Russia.
Why Battle of Britain? For Britain, war for Britain, and for Germany, for trying to make them sign peace, that Hitler so desperately wanted... And he was very angry when he realized that they dont want peace, so he started to make drastic moves... He even send his second man, Rudolph Hess, to try to convince them to sign peace. He should get Nobel prize for his efforts...
General Poslije Bitke not to mention he was drip-feeding false intelligence to both the Nazis and the Soviets that the other was planning an imminent invasion. Get the two biggest Kids on the Block to fight and then take out the winner after he's been tired out. It's a story as old as time itself
Looking through Churchill's eyes, all he have to do is open more fronts for Germans after realizing there will be no invasion of England, like in Africa, which was English main front and German secondary, help Russians to get Germans out of Caucasus, and push USA in war. The Germans definitely lost war in Stalingrad. But even if they did take Caucasus, it would take them another year to repair, start producing and transporting oil... So...
British secret communiques in Nov 1941 were aware of the Japanese pearl harbour mission but never informed the US gov't. They needed the US in the war.
Alternate opinions now require age verification by google/youtube? 🤔
@34:00...
Stalin was, after all, a Bank Robber.
I was not aware of the Polish Attacks on German Speaking Poles. "Sanitized" Version portrays Poles as Primitive Inepts.
This is no way ignores the Nazi & Soviet intent to capture Poland. It does "complicate" the Narrative, as England wanted War as the End Game to preserve their fading Empire.
WW2 actually hastened the collapse of the British empire.
@@HateTheIRS of course however it was an historic moral victory.... not that one hears much gratitude nowadays..
@@DaveSCameron You really believe UK fought Germany for moral reasons? if you do you are hopelessly naive my friend. Churchill fought to preserve the British Empire. But he was a deluded drunk who thought USA would allow Britain to retain her empire. Churchill was a sucker.
Putin seems to follow Stalinistic manner now ....kinda ..🙏✌️
that poor guy at 31:27 first he gets his head smacked in Czechoslovakia and now the polish beat him up, too!!
Yeap, this is the most famous German guy ( after Hitler?). He gets beat up before, during and after the war.
He deserved it, he wouldn't negotiate.
Imagine being a civilian stuck between Stalin and Hitler, two thugs with absolute power and an army!
@@johnschmit6815 - You really are a degenerate..
This is a nice timeline with lots of detail, but you have to read the books. And you have to understand the history of this history, the 19th Century and the demise of Royalty, the industrial revolution, and the new technology of war making after the US Civil War. Aircraft changed everything, as did radio and the submarine. What caused the war was the resort to military force to enforce a philosophy of national dominance, which sounds stupid/obvious, but in fact Germany could have done better by simply becoming the great engineering & manufacturing power it is today and not attacking anyone after Munich. Cultural superiority by itself is just peculiarity, until you start to move armies into other nations. The philosophy of large scale violence was acceptable to the Germans, Hitler was molded in WW1.
it wasn't just acceptable to Germans but to everyone, there were no hippies in 1939 and still today it's in the nature of states to wage wars for power and dominance, it's unavoidable, there might be extended periods of peace but due to shifts in power eventual return to the natural state of war will always follow to establish a new equilibrium.
Britain was determined to destroy Germany for that very reason. They didn’t want economic competition
Hopefully people can listen to this with an open mind, as opposed to only siding with the interpretation of the victors. Not everything that it suggests may be true but it is still worth analyzing the other sides perspective, if not then you have no credibility on this topic. Just remember, there are no good guys and bad guys in war. Every side of a conflict is responsible, something that the victors will never accept and something the media does not want the masses to understand.
Sean Engn there is NOTHING TO BE ANALYZED. This is PURE RUBBISH!
My opinion matters because of “muh ancestors” stfu
Very informative video and disabuses me of some myths of ww2 as told to me by hollywood
Japan started WWII by invading China in 1937, Italy followed and then Germany invaded Poland in 1939.
Erwin Kunze 1937? They had been fighting unofficially since 1931. It Japan it is often called "The 15 years war" because of this.
Ì agree that it's right to hear both sides of the story.
In the simplest terms...sometimes very, very bad people, who do lots of bad things, sometimes do some good things. This does not make them good people.
Yeah...duh 🙄
ty Mr. Luga
Age restrictions on our own history now, what was the fighting for freedom for?
Go back in time and my god, actual censorship! Not mere friendly reminder that some may find this content offensive.
@@joqqeman Indeed yes just try any main historical channel on this platform and click on the Playlist, from here in England you'll discover the censorship with up to 80% of them verboten, makes one wonder what you war of freedom was necessary for..
Very good
From around 8:53 mins
Not entirely correct.
The Allies also downscale their armed forces, for example the Washington Naval Treaty, or the significant reductions in the strengths of the various air forces.
None, however even close to the 100,000 imposed onto Germany though, so that part is correct.
The sound quality is so poor that it renders this video unlistenable. Anything you can do Vasile?
Yeah, press the ‘stop being an entitled pussy’ button and that should clear up the issue mate
@@rhysnichols8608 Thank you, I laughed so hard it was scaring the kids.
@@sleeperawake9818
Haha I’m glad it had that affect on you, but these people piss me off 😂
Why wouldn't they have the same narrator from the first part?
I have not reached it yet but I am looking forward to how the author of this glosses over / excuses Hitler's annexation of the whole of Czechoslovakia.
Rodger Stone
After he learned the soviet government was trying to force the Czech president to open Czechoslovakia to the red army he took control of the whole country. Quite a reasonable course of action that was explained in this vid.
@Jay Schnitzler
Jack wherung?
Look up the ancient lineage of the land of Czechoslovakia. Let us know when you find it.
@Wehrmacht Bear
Do you have any social media my old friend haha ?
@@Horsemanray
Lmao Holland is the most justifiable one along with Norway because the British were literally on their way to invade in plan R4 to annex the iron ore and resources, the Norwegian priminister literally invited the Germans in to prevent his country being a war zone. Holland was part of that strategic occultation and was necessary land for fighting against Britain who refused all offers of peace from Germany. The UK also invaded Iceland at this time, it’s just how war works
You have to add to the fact that yes there is 2 side to the story but usually the real truth lies in between the stories given by each side, so with that said the best thing to do if you want the full truth is to get both sides of the story and use any evidence to see where the truth...
Love, respect and glory wished for all the German people! From Iran 🇮🇷 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
The 7 hertz ☆ Asshole.
Lol the Germans got chewed up and spit out in the end, only people who seem more proud of losing are the confederate traitors here in the US . Glory “wished” is all you have because actual glory did not occur for anyone in the German side unless it was in death, and they ultimately bowed down to the world for the second time in a couple decades. Their so-called leaders offed themselves or ran from their punishment like cowards until many got hunted down like dogs. Glory? 🤣 no wonder you live where you live, and I say that as someone who’s very critical of my own country.
0:35 Finally someone tells the true story of that wily warmonger Neville Chamberlin. He was such a monster.
Yep
At around 27:30 mins
They forget to mention that Hitler occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia on 15th March 1939.
+Michael RedCrow I agree. The points you addressed are utterly unacceptable behavior for a modern state.
Sadly though, we have to accept that the causes of WW2 have nothing to do with the atrocities and crimes you mentioned.
As a general truth, countries can get away with quite a lot (even ALL the things you mention); as long as they stick to their own borders. This is true even today.
Even today, any of the things you mentioned, is generally not a cause for an outside power to use as a reason to intervene. As much as all decent people would want this to be true -- it is not.
Countries don't have friends, only interests.
WW2 was triggered when Germany invaded Poland, but the CAUSES are far more complicated.
The main cause of WW2 was the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact in 1939. The secret protocol was the real reason it was signed in the first place. The secret protocol was a division of East Europe into spheres of interest, and Stalin greedily accepted. He greedily accepted, since his negotiations with the west had turned out to be fruitless, and making a deal with Hitler meant that he could have Finland, Eastern Poland, the Baltic States and Moldavia (from Romania).
Stalin knew perfectly well that signing it would leave him with a future common border with Nazi Germany.
He did it anyway.
He did it voluntarily, no duress, no force applied from outside.
The Non-aggression part was merely a pretext, since both dictators signatures weren't worth the ink it was written with. The pact between two mass murderers enabled everything which followed after that, and was therefore the main reason which allowed Hitler to invade Poland, AND Stalin to attack the Balkan States, Poland, and Finland.
Kinda embarrassing, having an 'ally' Stalin, aka the 'cute Uncle Joe', which caused WW2., which is why most mainstream historians ignore it.
What is your opinion of the role of the nonaggression pact between the two dictators, and the role it played in causing the war?
Michael RedCrow I think we can certainly agree on many things. Your comment was practically the same as I would have written myself.
Of course, it would have been foolish for GB and France to declare war on the SU in 1939, since that would (most likely) have resulted in an (at least temporary) full alliance between Hitler and Stalin.
Thank God that it turned out to be the lesser evil of any number of bad choices :-)
You are entirely correct though. We should not forget the millions of victims in Eastern Europe, who suffered fifty years of communist oppression as a result.
+Michael RedCrow Well said mate. I agree also, thanks for saying it so clearly. I'm reading "the Third Reich in Power" by Richard J. Evans. Hitler was as Catholic as I am the Pope. And how they treated the Seventh Day Adventists who were a threat to on one is just pitiful.
+Ralph Bernhard He was right because the Czechs comploted with Russia
Hans Neumann
You should maybe use words like 'some' or ' many' to clarify your statement.
The only Czechs who fought openly against the Central Powers, were ex-POWs in the Czech Brigade (around 50,000 if I remember correctly). Others fought in the Austrian-Hungarian army, on the side of the Central Powers.
Politically, there were nationalists who wanted independence, who lived in Paris.
Newsflash, that war was happening no matter what . The war arms industry made record profits
I love the way they seem to have forgotten the Nazi-Soviet Nonagrresion Pact of August 1939. I can see how this little item would provide a glitch in the nutty story. And don't those lovely German songs just send a thrill through your system?
The non aggression pact was nullified when the Soviet Union annexed Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and attacked Finland. It was inevitable they were gonna invade Europe as NKVD archives now prove....Germany took preemptive action
Dont forget about how russia said how they were afraid of romania hahaha its sad how many people now so little
Balfour Declaration
I would believe the German side more than the British narrative
Anybody read Mien Kampf lately?
No it's banned... unlike bolshevik crap
It should be banned
along with bolshevik crap
nobody who brings up Mein Kampf has actually read it. They only know what they've been told about it or think it was about.
Which version are we talking about the biased or unbiased makes a big difference???
This is twisted history to the extream.
34:45
25,000,000 Ukrainians Starved
by
?
cant say name or comment deleted .
He messed with the Jews
Question to video poster : did Hitler do anything during WWII that would generally be considered evil?
YES! He poisoned his dog...
Stalin has a big moustache.
Germany was lucky to survive WWI at all.
How incredibly refreshing for a near Axis/German documentary viewed upload to appear! How did these erstwhile treasonous opinions ( facts!) evade censorship? Best wishes from a freedom seeking Englishman.
Every single thing in all three parts of this series is commonly available in many books. So your surprise is nothing but naivete on your part. You can find 2500 books on this period in a big library, do you think this simple RUclips has anything new? Where do you suppose this author got his info?
@@johnsmith1474 Hah hah! Ok I accept your higher class education but please spare a thought for us comprehensive state educated individuals who require at least a decade to undo the bias before using our spare time to educate ourselves. Best wishes 🙏
@@DaveSCameron - Ha ha talk about arrogant & condescending your whole fucking nation is 500 years of arrogance on steroids. Get the hell out of Ireland! Good heath to you!
This video was certainly done by someone other than the person/people who produced the Battlefield Series. I greatly prefer the latter.
Did the Allies agree to reduce their army size in the treaty of Versailles???
I guess if you ignore everybody you are automatically correct
Odd comment, you require any numbers for help?
WWII started by Munich agreement in 1938. Nazi Germany signed agreement with western countries to start WWII. Poland was involved indirectly. Ambassador Lukashevich discussed with French government and got approval to invade Chehoslowakia. USSR unfortunately did not help Chehoslowakian brothers to retain independence from rude Polish invasion!
Come on, Japan, Hitler's stepping over Versailles, UK\German naval agreement, etc...
@Proud Gay Man Wow, you're a frightening man *
This documentary took +1 hour and 16 minutes to say, “Germany”??? Germany started WWII! With Japan in the east, of course. I think this documentary needs a new title, lol!
no matter who started the war, it was the blood British who changed this conflict between them and Germany(their old enemy) into a world war by forcefully bringing the oppressed colonial people into the battlefield , when their plans failed miserably in the battlefield. the Americas always helped the Brits to get monetary benefits.The later was never forced into the war , they waged it (indirectly by their actions) and fuelled it
+Nayan Ranjan Mukerje do you mean US policy in regards to the Chinese/ Japanese war at the time?
+Ghost Perry US policy i n the issue you mentioned cannot see seen separately.At that same time they were actively helping the allies in European war(in reality) although they kept on saying that they have nothing to do with war in Europe.
Nayan Ranjan Mukerje correct especially during the battle of the of Atlantic and arms sales to the British State
Another strike..The narrator says that in March 1939 Poland, Reinstag (or watever it's called) Brunning meets with Churchill and proposed to avoid a military confrontation with Germany he was brushed off by Churchill that said that he wanted the German economy completedly smashed.. That is another strike a big one for Winston Churchill was not even in the picture yet...Churchill became Prime Minister of the U.K. on May 10th 1940 and had no power at that time to have meetings neither the less to enter negotiations with either Germany or Poland...talking about propaganda
You sure of yourself he was lord of the admiralty so thats a strike against you and yes brunning was in exile in london strike 2 and strike 3 who do you think was in charge of the norway operation hum hum..... CHURCHILL and what happened there you really need a history lesson next youll tell me he just annexed Czechoslovakia ill wait for your answer but wont hold my breath i gave you an extra at bat but it wont help your uneducated ass lmfao
It didn't say he "met with Churchill '. It says he met with the foreign ministry. Also Churchill was to "in the picture". He was very much in the picture at that time. He was a member of parliament, and then at the start of the war, Lord of the Admiralty, then Prime Minister. You should pay closer attention,and get the facts straight before you call bullshit, on the video!!
Also the guy who you say "met with Churchill", was a former member of the Polish government and was living in exile in London. So he wasnt negotiating for anyone.
In this version you hear a tale of how Germany was encouraged to go to was by the western Allies being bulligerent. Its a prospective that adds value to understanding WW2, though its not wholely acceptable to me. Nowhere in this version does the Jewish murders get attention.
Thank you for this conspiracy theory speech with a Russian accent.
Whatever you hear first must be the truth...
read book by Victor Suvorov Icebreaker.....
.
I’m so glad that RUclips gets to decide what’s offensive…. Whatever
The provocation is parallel comparing Polish aggressions with French,Check and sometimes British backing ..It almost Hitler just joined the club finally....not that German semetics we're ok....but I see Polish beating up Germans and barring get.an business in the lead up ...amongst many other ....
I know why Hitler attacked Poland because I saw: you tube: Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof on The war that had many fathers (with English subtitles)
UNBELIEVABLE DENIAL OF THE TRUTH !
Uneducated lost you like the. Lies
Wait I don't understand...or maybe I missed it in the video, but from my knowledge,Germany later invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia. Why did they do that? Wasn't Hitler just asking for the Sudetenland? And to me the killing of his people has no relation to starting the war, but I may be wrong. The only thing I could think of would be to make Hitlers genocide of the Jews seem ..... Less bad...... Just my two cents though
SeanChaos117 Because the people in eastern Czechoslovakia (Slovakia) wanted greater autonomy and allegedly asked Germany for help. So, Slovakia became a German protectorate and the rest of Czechoslovakia was occupied by invitation (apparently). In short, after being forced to give up the Sudetenland to Germany (and their defensive line along with it) they were unable to resist.
SeanChaos117 WW2 for Germany wasn't ever just about getting that parts with strong German majority or even minority. It was about forming a lasting monoethnical and cultural empire. Same situation that you've described about Czechoslovakia happened with Poland - Hitler supposedly wanted to make a smaller Polish state but GB and France didn't let him? Well, it was within his power to make a puppet state like Vichy for serious political and military gains (Polish units against USSR), but it wasn't fitting Great Germany narrative. It was better to exterminate undesirables.
SeanChaos117 We all know what was REALLY going on back then - A Struggle for dominance and jostling for position in World Trade/Routes, Military, Resources and Space/land... Same eternal struggle that has being fought since beginning of Man.. Suez Canal and Panama Canals were both diplomatically negotiated over unsuccessfully so the Interested Empires invaded and Took control of them from the Host countries - that's just a tiny example what played out in WW1, WW2 and TODAY in every War around the Globe.. There is no Good side or Bad side ALL sides are the same.. Japan and America were also involved in a similar but separate squabble of their own at the same time...
arek314 Hitler and the Third Reich was a strong bulwark against Soviet communism. Stalin nd Churchill were more responsible for the war than a Germany trying to re-unite after the crushing terms of Versaiilles. Barbarossa was a pre-emptive strike against Stalin who was very busy staging his armies at the German border. It was obvious he planned to invade western Europe.
If Hitler needed bulwark against USSR why had Germany acted so aggressively against Poland? Up until mid 1930' German-Polish relationship were ok (save for occasional trade disagreement) and Polish-USSR were very hostile. You don't set a bulwark against someone by knocking your probable ally first.
"RUclips Community" put a warning on this video?! lol
Watched the first one but I wont be watching this. I love alternative views of conflicts but the commentator made a serious factual error in the first two minutes.
Good stuff anyway Vasile.
Michael RedCrow he was forced! Didn't you hear the man say it! It must be true!!
tyskbulle Just suppose you rectify that "factual error"?
eatenbytheweasel It claims that it was the remnants of the treaty of versaille that blocked peace in europe by August 1939. That treaty had already been broken several times and proved to not be in effect, both by the violations of the germans and the unresponsiveness of the former allies who where to inforce it. Then you have the czechs after Hitler signed a new treaty not to demand or annex more territory after the sudetenland.
Mutch of the territory lost to the poles where after all held by referendums after the end of the war and the majority ruled with exception of Katowice.
The fact remains that Germany lost world war one and should as the tradition implies cede territory. To then demand the old imperial borders along with the sudetenland and the czechs is really going way to far.
Last but not least, Hitler had already signed the molotov ribbentrop pact, ensuring the destruction of Poland and a division of eastern europe between the axies and the soviets.
PS: It starts with a speech of Hitler, probably after the defeat of France. About the allies refusal to negotiate and their warmongering policies. Not very partial start right there. I want to see the German viewpoint but most of all I dont want propoganda, angled views or events in the wrong order.
I hope thats enough.
Sorry. I ain't buying it.
eatenbytheweasel You are of course entitled to your opinion. But you asked and I gave you an answer. I certainly hope however that you dont think that Hitler was a great guy just for trying to rectify the injustice of versaille.
I am going to add my comments as I watch this. First off and I am only to 13.08 it stated Germany disarmed according to the treaty of Versailles this is true on the other hand it said France, Britain, and the United States did not disarm. Which is blatantly false. The Navies of the U.S., Britain, and France were limited by the Washington treaty of 1920 in which there was a moratorium on new construction capitol ship. The U.S. Drastically drew down the Army and Marines. Trying to state otherwise is blatantly false.
Thats not what the numbers shows. In 1939 the British had 15 battleships and France had 7, while Germany had only 1. Also the german navy until 1935 were totally destroyed. Did this happened with the British Navy? Also Germany were forbidden to have an Air Force. Did the Royal Air Force and French Air Force were forbidden? Until 1935 Germany were forbidden to have more than 100.000 men in the army. Even after Hitler restored the army and the compulsory draft in 1935, the French army were still the double size of the german army in 1939. If you compares germans army size with the rest of Europe in 1939, including USSR and British you will a proportion of 1/97. Germany also had an inferior number in therms of tanks and aircraft. A comparison of Germany and USSR in numbers of these equipaments, USSR had the advantage of 10/1. And i didnt even mentioned the army, navy and equipaments of the US.
The U.S took soldiers off payroll as the did not need that large of peace time force.U.S also got rid of all obsolete wood vessels burnt them to waterline off shore of charles county MD.20 miles south of D.C .This being said this down grade was to modernize arm forces more than anything
OH dear, it was always some one else's fault.
For this aecond film of the threelogie you have to sign in RUclips and confirm that you're 18.
Obviously at least half naked scenes are expected.😂😂😂
History is always complicatet
USA did not even signed the Treaty..There are many lies here but I want to ponder that one. USA was not involved at all in any of Europe's machinations. USA entered WW1 after Germany not only bombed an American civilian ship but also sent a letter to the them President of Mexico asking help in the war and in return Germany was going to wage war on USA to help Mexico get back the territories in USA power. (that's when USA entered WW1)but never at the end of the war engaged in any of the Pacts and treaties signed.. In fact USA was again'st the treaty of versailles and tried to help Germany at that time. USA was even sending money to Germany as relief for the treaty of versailles. Money that Hitler used to create his army of thugs. Germany with it's whining about the hardship of the Treaty never got to honor it, other countries took pity on Germany and allied to help. . Finally, Hitler declared war on USA not the other way around. Nazi ass kissers are trying to change the history of WW2 but it does not match. Hitler was a criminal and at the end his army of thugs, looters, rapist and murderers got what they deserved alone with him.... Next
vickssma _ many lies? THIS IS ONE BIG, FAT LIE!
Not true. You don’t know enough. Please research. Too much to explain to you about FDR And his machinations along with Churchill and the usual suspects
Why didn’t France and the UK never declare war on the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland? Why Germany only? After Poland Stalin later on invaded the three small baltic states and after accomplishing that went on to invade Finland. Why were they silent about Stalin’s aggression when in fact Stalin and hitler had signed a treaty that clearly divided the spoils between them. The truth is that hitler was the only one to have the balls to take on Stalin even though he had a country that dwarfed that of hitlers. France the UK and later on the US were scared shit of the Soviet Union and all they managed to do was gang up on countries that were smaller to them. So they picked on Germany Italy and Japan but turned a blind eye to the biggest bully in the campus.
here here...! now that is some TRUTH, THANK YOU KYLA..How can I communicate with you directly??
Yes. Churchill stay aside, cause he knew, that his embargo on oil on Hitler, will push Hitler at war with Russia... Cause, ether will Germany buy oil from Russia, for which Russia demand huge industrial payment, or will try, what Britain hoped, to take it by force...
I really hate the stupid clip: History is written by the victors. Not so. History is written by historians. Many of the best, most highly regarded accounts of WWII were written by Germans.
+Hardtop Harry - Well said. Neo Nazis keep repeating that ridiculous line. They totally ignore all of the excellent German Historians...lol
Stalin's was industrializing Russia. When Hitler invaded he caught Stalin with his pants down for Stalin started the preparation of tanks after he read Mein Kampf in which Hitler's wote that he was going to attack the Soviet Union. When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union only 28 t-34 tanks were made. Hitler took over the Ukraine and with it the steel factories making it impossible for Stalin to continue the fabrication of tanks. Stalin then moved the rest of his factories to the Ural mountains and with assistance of Great Britain, Canada and Australia that supplied him with steel, and tanks, (British tanks) planes etc..Hitler was able to advance into the Soviet Union because Stalin was not prepared nor had the right equipment to fight Hitler. In the battle of Berlin old tanks from the U.K and old planes from WW1 were used for the defense of Moscow. Later when USA entered the war the Soviet Ubion received lend lease among that steel, zinc, iron, ore, airplanes tanks, you name it.. with the steel Stalin was able to produce more t-34's and more advance weapons like the Katuscha ( or something like that) This is another propaganda lie... Stalin was not going to attack Germany. Great Britain told Stalin that Hitler was going to attack and Stalin disregarded the U.K thinking that they just wanted to create problems so that he could enter into the war. Russia fought WW2 because Hitler invaded the Soviet Union like he said he was going to do in his book Mein Kampf.
"age restricted"
Oh heaven forbid you call a socialist a socialist.
the Soviets did the same. my favorite part was people like kietel and kaltenbrunner and others dancing at the end of a rope. hitler declared war on the u.s. and the Soviet union. he was furious when france declared war on Germany. Kinda reap what you sew
Robert Tauzin it’s “sow”, not “sew”
Yes, these things happened but; Hitler had already taken Czechoslovakia and pulled a fast one in Austria. How much trust did Britain and France have for Germany? How much trust did the Poles have for Hitler?
Nobody trusted anyway in Europe in the 19th Century, or the first half of the 20th Century. It was all saber rattling and military build up, with treaty alliances and horse trading. Trust was not part of the process. You made a deal on power and threats.
Do find the number of 98% just a little suspicious? Do you believe everything your told? Do you understand who ran that vote?
When was the last time you cracked a book?
the biggest question I alway wanted to ask was,what does poland and England have in common?
dog heart sun spots _ Poland.
They had treaties with each other, and many Scots had settled in Poland in the previous 2 centuries. Among other reasons.
The jew.
HungryHyena Oh, look Mommy, a puppy can we take it home?
Seems a great series....... but fully pro British. With a the History of imperialist enslavement, pillage and sanctioned murder that goes with it.
So..... in a way Poland and the USSR started WW2
In the mind of a very slow thinking only.
Look at the amount of black French prisoners of war back then , disgusting
The audio on this video sucks. Clean it up.
Who put this piece together....Joe Goebbels family? LOL. Try harder. Then again - give up.
Actually though as I live in the US I put up with views that I don’t agree with. I think that Mein Kampf, The Communist Manifesto, The Bible and other works of fiction should be available for anyone. It’s this thing we have about freedom of speech and the press. We have a lot of freedoms that those who were terrorized under National Socialism from 1933 to 1945 in Germany didn’t have. The abuse of these freedoms are what the Nazis used to discredit the Weimar Republic and oversee its ultimate demise and the demise of democracy in Germany. Is Bolshevism any better? If so then not by much. Arguing which one is the greater evil is like choosing your method of execution. Do you want the French guillotine or the German axe?
Lies in a blunt head.
😂😂😂😂😂
Oh the poor Germans were picked on .....give me a freaking break... I love to hear these Nazi apologists try to rewrite history
ruclips.net/video/Xml4o16H3EM/видео.html
Watch it you might learn something
Some hardcore Nazi apologist action here...
You've picked a side, and without looking any further than what you've been taught in school, stick to that side. Your society demands it. But notice how the German version of things goes much deeper than the Allied. It makes me wonder who's telling the truth. Still, history is written by the victors, is it not? And as long as you blindly accept their version of things without hearing both sides, you are nothing more than their lapdog
char jl
More like sceptics that questions the story that has been drilled into our heads for 70-80 years. I encourage such behaviour. We should never stop questioning history as there is always something we can learn.
No history is written by hisroians and tehre are mnay fine Germans historians who ahve written history. What a stupid slogan " History is written by the victor."
ruclips.net/video/ewTX9bsWVfU/видео.html take a deeper look from the soviet side
Lies and more lies. Germany is the victim in this video. Hahahaha. Lies.
I viewed this as an amusing and curious bit of pro-Hitler propaganda and had to wonder where and when it first aired, until I shut it off at the 1:03:53 mark. "50 cruisers"? This wasn't written by the victors *or* the losers. It was written in ignorance.
Pro hitler cause its the truth funny go watch tgsnt or hitlers revolution by richard tedor might be beyond your iq
read mine kampf, its straight from the horse's ass, then watch Nuremburg trials. anyways, thanks for the doc! needed a good laugh, in the end its admitted, Germany started it.
You really need a history lesson go watch tgsnt or listen to hitlers revolution then get back to me and oh yeah what about leon degrelle ?? Was he evil too ??just asking haha lmfao peep like you are the problem with history sheep
Lol propaganda fail. We had to invade Poland cuz we no wanna pay zlotys? Pull the one with ze bells on Mr Hilter. Some epic moments here.
Your momma!
What an absolute farce.
you sure about that?
The Jewish version.