The truth is that some lions are bigger than tigers, and some tigers are bigger than lions, it’s not like one species is bigger than the other, even though there are some exceptions of oversized ones, but that is not the norm, or the average.
Who would win between a 200pound sloth bear and a tiger head on which I saw tiger backing away from if you can answer that then you will able to answer who would win between a 550 pound lion and a tiger because a black bear cannot defeat an asiatic lion so I wonder what would common sense tells about an African lion and tiger
A wild adult male lion will win against a tiger, but in captivity it all depends upon the individual animals. The lion is a beast and the tiger is a big cat and fight like a house cat, as the lion fights like a Pitbull
Seems someone else corrected you before I could. Not sure where you got that tigers are slightly smaller than lions from. Probably from a lion fanboy video here. In the 50 years I have been reading and watching things about big cats and bears, I have never read or seen anything that says lions are bigger than tigers. Only in a few youi.tube videos have I heard such a ridiculous statement. Saying it is to hard to call who would win means you don't have the education to give the answer. There is no question who would win to those of us who have been educated. All one needs to do is look back in history because man has forced these two animals to fight each other a couple of thousand times. Starting back with the Romans and there events in the coliseum. I don't remember exactly how many different sources I have read about this. My best guess is around 30 or so. All of them indicated in one way or another that the tiger usually won. With that many different sources all saying the same thing, there is no doubt that this is a fact. What I could find out was around 1,900 fights between tigers and lions were staged for the Roman public. The lion won 263 of those fights. That is 14% of the time. That backs up what the other sources stated, the tiger usually won. There has been many fights between the two since Rome. Lions have done a little better winning around 25% of the time. I am only referring to fair fights meaning one on one and both are healthy males. So the only thing these fights had to determine who would win was the tiger and the lion themselves. Many try and answer this by saying it depends on the individual when it just depended on one being a tiger and one being a lion. This subject can even be debated because historical fact clearly show the tiger is superior. This is also supported by what science has been able to tell us. Things like the fact that tigers are bigger, has more muscle mass and density which equals superior strength and power. Tigers are more intelligent, more agility, aggression, longer claws and canines plus a much stronger bite force. 1,050psi for the tiger and 650psi for the lion. Due to the fact that tigers have much stronger rear legs, tigers are able to stand up on them for long periods of time. This allows the tiger to use both front paws in a fight like a boxer. This also gives the tiger good mobility allowing it to avoid strikes. Lions have weak back legs and can only stand up on them for very short periods of time. This means it has to keep one paw on the ground fro balance. This means he can only use one front paw in the fight and makes him much less mobil. This forces the lion to have to absorb many strikes. This means the tiger has superior fighting abilities and because this is a one on one fight, something the tiger always does and the lion rarely does because they always fight as a group. ONe on one fighting is what tigers do and lions rarely do so the tiger has more fighting experience in this type of fight. All of these advantages, it isn't hard to believe the tiger has been so dominate over the lion.
The Romans had trouble getting the tigers to fight is what I read from a life long resident that claims to know the real story, and the lions fought every opponent put in place without fear. This is why lions where title king, and why wasn’t the tiger titled the king if your information is the truth, doesn’t make sense does it. I mean the Roman army’s emblem is the lion and not the tiger. You can read a 100 of different stories about this history and it doesn’t mean anything if it’s just being rewritten from each other, or from the same source, as I found different versions of it and even if a 100 say the same it doesn’t mean it’s true, it could be just a 100 of the same narrative. There’s stories of tigers killing X amount of lions, and stories of lions killing X amount of tigers. The fact is that bias is going to play out in most cases and getting bias or bogus exaggerated stories will make people feel and believe in what they encompass. The tiger averages 400/500 just like lions in the wild. This theory or science saying tigers out weigh lions by a 100 plus pounds is ludicrous, and show me where tigers average over 500 or 600 pound tiger that’s always in sight, you can’t because its just not true. Even in captivity you won’t find any or maybe a couple, and far as the Siberian Tigers is concerned they average 450 pounds also, the Bengals are bigger now for some odd reason, but I seen some big bulky ones reaching 600 pounds in captivity but with a lion that’s even bigger. The size thing is far off just because species reached such and such size doesn’t make it the standard. There tigers bigger or a lot bigger than lions, and there are bigger or a lot bigger lions than tigers period. In battle they don’t come across each other unless they are captive or pitted against each other but that can’t be determined if it is fair or anything really, but a wild 500 pound lion against a wild 500 pound tiger I would give the advantage to the lion due to its big thick mane that is like a armor of 10/12 inches of dreadlocks underneath its neck, and the experience of its nature of combative life structure in its blood from multiple generations, and its ability to fight for a long duration. The tiger is a good boxer but doesn’t have enough leverage to generate power on it’s hind legs which makes its strikes less impactful, as when the lion strikes with its paw with maximum force and leverage while standing on 3 legs. The tiger attacks aggressively and goes all in which tires the tiger out from exhaustion within 2 minutes, this is where the tiger panics and runs or submits and lion is just getting started. This is the case in most of the altercations with the famous big trainer Clyde, but there are stories from other trainers that the tiger wins 50/50, and of course being superior. But who knows what story is true and what is made up or just bias? My personal and honest opinion is pound for pound the Jaguar is the strongest, and if they could reach the same size as lion and tigers, they would be king of the big cats. Well anyways I love and respect all the big cats I just bought a nice framed picture of a tiger submerged halfway in the water up to its nose, and I have a painting of a tiger in some brushes, and a lion, jaguar. I have a video playlist ( lions) with a 827 pound lion and other 700 pound lion, and huge tigers being compared and in the same enclosure, and many others feel free to explore if you’re interested, and there’s a video on a 100 reasons why the lion is superior to the big house cat, and I know the title sounds disrespectful to the tiger but it’s there if you want to dispute any of the claims or agree with some etc. ✌
I had a response pointing out everything you are wrong about and accidently hit some button that deleted all of it. I am not going to rewrite it because I don't have the time or care enough to do it again. Just gonna say you are wrong and leave it at that. I am pretty pissed off right now cause I have no idea which button I accidently hit. I explained why you were wrong which even though I type fast, took a while because you were wrong pretty much about everything you said. I guess you got lucky. I am getting tired of having to correct so many uneducated, ignorant, stupid delusional lion fanboys anyway. There is no end to their stupidity. I am done.
Do some research, even bengal tigers are bigger than african lions let alone a siberian tiger, but rest of the video was good 💌 keep it up
Tigers are not that much bigger than lions, them few pounds don't mean nothing in a fight, the lion isn't called the king of Beasts for no reason
du hast wirklich keine ahnung dumm schwätzer du
The truth is that some lions are bigger than tigers, and some tigers are bigger than lions, it’s not
like one species is bigger than the other, even though there are some exceptions of oversized ones,
but that is not the norm, or the average.
@jimsmith9744 you're right the size is the same pretty much
not always
Who would win between a 200pound sloth bear and a tiger head on which I saw tiger backing away from if you can answer that then you will able to answer who would win between a 550 pound lion and a tiger because a black bear cannot defeat an asiatic lion so I wonder what would common sense tells about an African lion and tiger
A wild adult male lion will win against a tiger, but in captivity it all depends upon the individual animals.
The lion is a beast and the tiger is a big cat and fight like a house cat, as the lion fights like a Pitbull
@jimsmith9744 yep
Seems someone else corrected you before I could. Not sure where you got that tigers are slightly smaller than lions from. Probably from a lion fanboy video here. In the 50 years I have been reading and watching things about big cats and bears, I have never read or seen anything that says lions are bigger than tigers. Only in a few youi.tube videos have I heard such a ridiculous statement. Saying it is to hard to call who would win means you don't have the education to give the answer. There is no question who would win to those of us who have been educated. All one needs to do is look back in history because man has forced these two animals to fight each other a couple of thousand times. Starting back with the Romans and there events in the coliseum. I don't remember exactly how many different sources I have read about this. My best guess is around 30 or so. All of them indicated in one way or another that the tiger usually won. With that many different sources all saying the same thing, there is no doubt that this is a fact. What I could find out was around 1,900 fights between tigers and lions were staged for the Roman public. The lion won 263 of those fights. That is 14% of the time. That backs up what the other sources stated, the tiger usually won. There has been many fights between the two since Rome. Lions have done a little better winning around 25% of the time. I am only referring to fair fights meaning one on one and both are healthy males. So the only thing these fights had to determine who would win was the tiger and the lion themselves. Many try and answer this by saying it depends on the individual when it just depended on one being a tiger and one being a lion. This subject can even be debated because historical fact clearly show the tiger is superior. This is also supported by what science has been able to tell us. Things like the fact that tigers are bigger, has more muscle mass and density which equals superior strength and power. Tigers are more intelligent, more agility, aggression, longer claws and canines plus a much stronger bite force. 1,050psi for the tiger and 650psi for the lion. Due to the fact that tigers have much stronger rear legs, tigers are able to stand up on them for long periods of time. This allows the tiger to use both front paws in a fight like a boxer. This also gives the tiger good mobility allowing it to avoid strikes. Lions have weak back legs and can only stand up on them for very short periods of time. This means it has to keep one paw on the ground fro balance. This means he can only use one front paw in the fight and makes him much less mobil. This forces the lion to have to absorb many strikes. This means the tiger has superior fighting abilities and because this is a one on one fight, something the tiger always does and the lion rarely does because they always fight as a group. ONe on one fighting is what tigers do and lions rarely do so the tiger has more fighting experience in this type of fight. All of these advantages, it isn't hard to believe the tiger has been so dominate over the lion.
The Romans had trouble getting the tigers to fight is what I read from a life long resident that claims
to know the real story, and the lions fought every opponent put in place without fear. This is why lions
where title king, and why wasn’t the tiger titled the king if your information is the truth, doesn’t make
sense does it. I mean the Roman army’s emblem is the lion and not the tiger. You can read a 100
of different stories about this history and it doesn’t mean anything if it’s just being rewritten from each
other, or from the same source, as I found different versions of it and even if a 100 say the same it
doesn’t mean it’s true, it could be just a 100 of the same narrative. There’s stories of tigers killing X amount
of lions, and stories of lions killing X amount of tigers. The fact is that bias is going to play out in most cases
and getting bias or bogus exaggerated stories will make people feel and believe in what they encompass.
The tiger averages 400/500 just like lions in the wild. This theory or science saying tigers out weigh lions
by a 100 plus pounds is ludicrous, and show me where tigers average over 500 or 600 pound tiger that’s
always in sight, you can’t because its just not true. Even in captivity you won’t find any or maybe a couple,
and far as the Siberian Tigers is concerned they average 450 pounds also, the Bengals are bigger now for
some odd reason, but I seen some big bulky ones reaching 600 pounds in captivity but with a lion that’s
even bigger. The size thing is far off just because species reached such and such size doesn’t make it
the standard. There tigers bigger or a lot bigger than lions, and there are bigger or a lot bigger lions than tigers
period. In battle they don’t come across each other unless they are captive or pitted against each other but
that can’t be determined if it is fair or anything really, but a wild 500 pound lion against a wild 500 pound tiger
I would give the advantage to the lion due to its big thick mane that is like a armor of 10/12 inches of dreadlocks
underneath its neck, and the experience of its nature of combative life structure in its blood from multiple generations,
and its ability to fight for a long duration. The tiger is a good boxer but doesn’t have enough leverage to generate power
on it’s hind legs which makes its strikes less impactful, as when the lion strikes with its paw with maximum force and
leverage while standing on 3 legs. The tiger attacks aggressively and goes all in which tires the tiger out from exhaustion
within 2 minutes, this is where the tiger panics and runs or submits and lion is just getting started. This is the case in most
of the altercations with the famous big trainer Clyde, but there are stories from other trainers that the tiger wins 50/50, and
of course being superior. But who knows what story is true and what is made up or just bias? My personal and honest opinion
is pound for pound the Jaguar is the strongest, and if they could reach the same size as lion and tigers, they would be king of the
big cats. Well anyways I love and respect all the big cats I just bought a nice framed picture of a tiger submerged halfway in the
water up to its nose, and I have a painting of a tiger in some brushes, and a lion, jaguar.
I have a video playlist ( lions) with a 827 pound lion and other 700 pound lion, and huge
tigers being compared and in the same enclosure, and many others feel free to explore
if you’re interested, and there’s a video on a 100 reasons why the lion is superior to the
big house cat, and I know the title sounds disrespectful to the tiger but it’s there if you
want to dispute any of the claims or agree with some etc. ✌
I had a response pointing out everything you are wrong about and accidently hit some button that deleted all of it. I am not going to rewrite it because I don't have the time or care enough to do it again. Just gonna say you are wrong and leave it at that. I am pretty pissed off right now cause I have no idea which button I accidently hit. I explained why you were wrong which even though I type fast, took a while because you were wrong pretty much about everything you said. I guess you got lucky. I am getting tired of having to correct so many uneducated, ignorant, stupid delusional lion fanboys anyway. There is no end to their stupidity. I am done.