CONt'd We have less than 90 seconds on the D oo ms d a y Clock in the Garden Of Good & E v i l Your choices matter, still, for now. Maybe. Choose one! 💲 ☣️ ⚡ 🌐 💩🏴☠️ ⚡ ☢️ 💲 V$ 🌎 😍 🌘 Cont'd *NEXT*
@@NuanceOverDogma In the context of Neitzsche, the "will to power" is the vehicle to insanity. Nietzsche was destined for clinical insanity, but his perspective was always irrational because its foundation stone is irrational. (He did NOT find the Philosopher's Stone.) However, because he was so intelligent, his insanity was given the world stage - as if it is legitimate philosophy. Adolph Hitler bought his insanity, Ayn Rand and other "conservatives" bought his insanity, the Republican Party, Libertarians and other "conservative" organizations bought his insanity, Donald Trump RAN with that insanity, and now you will see that insanity result in the destruction of the United States, Israel, and democracy around the globe. But democracy will later rise as a Phoenix from the ashes - in China and Russia, where TRUE Christianity will be re-discovered, which is quite unlike the false Pauline Christianity of the West. For, FATE IS A FACT. ("Will to power," yea, right!) Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
I have to say, this is one of the best and most easy to undertand videos ( no so fast and comprehensible) I have wached. Theres some vidoes out there that the narrative is going so fast that makes it hard to follow. Please keep it at the same pace and thank you so much.
What's really odd to me, is that a lot of people like to say that Nietzsche was arrogant, but I think he was actually one of the most humble philosophers in a way, perhaps the most humble. Instead of claiming to "find the truth" like every other philosopher, he tackles the very notion of that being possible. He thinks we need a new value system clearly, but he never ventures to fully prescribe it himself. Something that other philosophers tried to do, which seems a bit more arrogant to me than anything Nietzsche said.
If you point out that you can say more in one sentence than other writers can in an entire book people will say you're arrogant. When they read your words and realise that it's true, people must acknowledge your genius. This was essentially what happened to Nietsche. It's like Ussain Bolt, LeBron or Messi saying they're the greatest athletes on earth. It sounds arrogant until you watch them compete.
Not odd at all, most ppl are threatened by truth, no one is more hated that the one who speaks the truth - plato. Tho i can understand perspective you mean it from, i have too deep symphaties, sometimes ppls' behavior stop making sense in any framework you know, it is indeed will-to-power and nothing besides. Who would come to known full truth of reality would perish. I saw full extent of human suffering and reality for what it is! And by some miracle i am still here, tho i don't believe on death... There is no escape except to man up and fix it... we need indeed art and make like game sport fun for everyone, otherwise pure dyonesian force is too excessive and not good art and too wild, unrestrained, most ppl would go crazy from it... And to raw/sadistic! YOu should elevate other ppl with you instead of pushing them down! Which is what corporations do today, which creates inimaginable suffering. Torture victims in prisoners say it is not worst the torture (in philippines to add), but uncertainty and stress they don't know how is their family and can't care about them!
"He thinks we need a new value system clearly, but he never ventures to fully prescribe it himself. Something that other philosophers tried to do, which seems a bit more arrogant to me than anything Nietzsche said." I don't agree. He's thinking about what a new value system would even look like in the first place. In fact, I think he questions whether or not a new value system is even possible. If you read Neitzche and come away with an answer, then you've completely missed the point. He's not saying there's not an answer, he's not saying that he's got the answer. Honestly, I think Neitzche is mostly just having fun. I think he's just doing what he does, and I'm just doing what I do by reading him.
@richardhorvatichfitdev6407 Friedrich Jacobi has a similar idea. “Even the greatest mind, if it wants to explain all things absolutely, to make them rhyme with each other… [will] run into absurdities”.
See also: NIETZSCHE: Will to Power Explained (all parts) ruclips.net/video/He6ZC7ZFBt8/видео.html If you found this video helpful, please like & subscribe. It helps out the channel a great deal. Thank you for watching! There's more Nietzsche coming.
Holy shit that perspectivism part blew my mind a little bit... no objective truth just a billion individual perspectives, and the accepted truth of the masses isn't necessarily because its objective, its because the person proclaiming his worldview had the most "Will To Power"
Each and every one of those billion invidual perspectives still have an objective component, because all perspectives agree on certain things. Everybody thinks that what they want, is good. This is objectively true, since there cannot be a perspective in which it is not true. If someone says that they want something bad, they simultaneously admitt that it is good from their perspective by wanting it. It is also objectively true that you cannot miss out on something you don't want, because claiming you missed out is the same as admitting you wanted the thing. Sorry for rambling im just using you to collect my thoughts.
@@cerwile1 that is actually how Plato saw it.. There is no evil, because everything is desired only because it is considered a good. The problem (according to Plato), is ignorance, not evil. Simply Ignorance of the nature of Being., which is beyond the opposites and complete unto itself. In other words, beyond all concepts.
@@michaelmcclure3383 And that brings us to virtue ethics. Whether something is good or bad isnt really arguable, because those value judgements are based on will and not reason. Virtues, on the other hand are arguable. I have the right to destroy my own property, so blowing up my house isnt really a matter of right and wrong, but if we use the language of virtues instead, it isnt really arguable that my act was "reckless" and "wasteful". And whether an act is "wasteful" or "reckless" are a matter of ignorance and wisdom as you said. The are arguable. Good vs bad is not.
I would love to see a Will to Power video separate from Beyond Good and Evil. I have seven of Nietzsche’s books and these videos help me understand him more thoroughly.
Understand Nietzsche thoroughly and you will either decide that you have wasted your time, or he will reinforce your lowest base instincts such that you become as mad as he. Nietzsche was destined for insanity. His perspective was always irrational. But because he was so intelligent, his insanity was given the world stage, as if it is legitimate philosophy. Adolph Hitler bought his insanity, Ayn Rand and other "conservatives" bought his insanity, the Republican Party, Libertarians and other "conservative" organizations bought his insanity, Donald Trump RAN with that insanity, and now you will see that insanity result in the destruction of the United States, Israel, and democracy around the globe. But democracy will later rise as a Phoenix from the ashes- in China and Russia, where TRUE Christianity will be re-discovered, which is quite unlike the false Pauline Christianity of the West. Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
your voice and speaking style just fits to these complicated philosophical subjects. RUclips is full of videos on these subjects where sound, and speaking style becomes a barrier. Your videos are also having the right substance, and time balance. Thank you, and congratulations!
What is happiness ? Absorption What is das source of unhappiness ? Ignoring das source of happiness. What is das source of happiness ? Das source of happiness is from within.
I would watch every single video about philosophy you post. So far on your channel we see high quality understanding and expo of philosophical works and philosophers.
Just stopped a video just to say how superb, step by step explanation you give us instead of fast going through bunch of texts other channels do. Means a lot to us who arent versed in philosophy scripture
Thank you so much. I've been having trouble trying to understand that book, and it sometimes keeps me awake at night. Now I have a greater insight on it
That analogy of the university only being a collection of buildings as the 'self' being only a collection of thoughts or the 'will' being only a collection of drives is brilliant! Decartes too had, as Nietsche put it in the prelude of BG&E, a "faith in grammar". This is revelational stuff!
@@honkahonkanoise Much obliged! "cogito ergo sum" "I think, therefore I am" Decartes believed this to be the rational bedrock on which he could build his entire philosophy. But let's examine this phrase; namely the first part: "I think" What is this "I" *really* ? Well, it's the subject of the sentence, right? It's the cause of the predicate, i.e. the cause of the action of "thinking" itself. But just as a 'university' is only a collection of buildings, and the 'self' is only a collection of thoughts, could this 'I' not also be a reduction of far more complex processes Why do we assume "I" exists? And even assume that it is in fact the cause of "thinking"? How do we *really* know that? Couldn't it be just as easily said that thoughts are merely "coming to us"? Who's to say that they aren't being somehow "implanted" into our awarness by something outside of it? For example, perhaps when I'm thinking about food, it's not because I thought it willingly, but that my hunger drive brought the thought of food to my attention, and I only thought I thought the thought of food completely after the fact? The assumption of "I" being the cause of "thought" may in fact be merely a stone-aged metaphisic preserved in our language. In this light, "I" can be understood in a very similar fashion to how we understand other metaphysical concepts like the "soul", that is to say, merely a supersition. An unreasonable, unwarented reduction of the phenomena of experiencing "thinking". A more resonable, honest statement would be: "There are thoughts" OR "experiences of thinking are occuring" But then there wouldn't be a justification for the existence of an "I" anymore, now would there? It could be said then, that Decartes had a faith in "I", a faith in grammar itself, just like Christians had a faith in a "soul".
I just read the first chapter of Beyond Good and Evil and figured I'd watch some vids explaining wtf I just read ... I'm happy I wasn't too far off.. thank you for the explanation, I look forward to viewing your previous and future vids - Cheers from Alabama (usa)
“The morality of free society can have no application to slave society. . . .Make a man a slave, and you rob him of of moral responsibility. Freedom of choice is the essence of all accountability.” ― Frederick Douglass, My Bondage and My Freedom
What a wonderful video. I feel a certain pull to be a part of the process of formulating the philosophy of the future in my own way, no matter how small or big.
The "will to power" for Nietzsche was the driving force behind all universal events, whether at a cellular or macroscopic level, from the simplest to the most complex phenomena. He describes this will as a creative and dominating force, essential for overcoming obstacles. Although Nietzsche didn't intend to attribute a purely mechanistic character to this concept, it's difficult to imagine how creativity would be associated with simple forms, such as unicellular beings. Therefore, I decided to approach this concept from a more universal perspective, in order to be consistent with its comprehensive explanation of everything in the universe. In summary, according to the concept developed by Nietzsche, the "will to power" would be the pursuit of dominating or shaping the world in our image and likeness. For instance, in Ancient Rome, the relentless quest for territorial conquest reflected this will, the idea of making the world more aligned with the Romans' vision. A writer, by publishing a book, seeks to influence those who read it to become more similar to himself; a singer, upon hearing their music being sung, experiences a sort of gain in the will to power by noticing that those who sing their music become more like them; a parent reproducing abusive behaviors for their child also pursues this will, molding them in their image and likeness; a prisoner, when confined in isolation, cannot exercise this will, as the world around them is not becoming more similar to their own image and likeness. Similarly, seemingly simple actions in nature, such as photosynthesis performed by a plant or the production of fruits by a tree, represent a way of exercising this will, shaping the surrounding world to resemble more their own nature. Likewise, the process of reproduction in living beings, cells multiplying, or even the sun burning an individual's skin are examples that reflect this pursuit of the manifestation of the "will to power," where the world around is shaped in resemblance to the influencing being. In a way, we can perceive creativity and destruction as the convergence of two "wills to power": the sun, by manifesting its will to power over the skin, creates something new; the burnt skin is now more aligned with the image and likeness of the sun. Parents exert their will to power in reproduction, generating something new, their child, reflecting the image and likeness of the parents. When Rome invaded other regions, it exercised its will to power, while the resisting army of the invaded region also exerted its will to power. Rome sought to shape the invaded region in its image and likeness, while the resisting army attempted to preserve the region according to its own image and likeness. Thus, creation, destruction, and overcoming are in tune with what is described as the will to power.
Lots of assumptions here , a writer or singer doesnt do what they love so that they can enforce their will , rather it is an be for several other things
i’ve always wanted to embark on a philosophical journey and really dive deeper into the subject, but i never knew how to begin. so after watching a Jordan Peterson lesson, i noticed his admiration for Nietzche - so the very first book i got to start learning more about philosophy was Beyond Good and Evil. After 10 days of reading, rereading, breaking it down, writing down thoughts and how it applied to the world, i FINALLY got past Part 1. i watched a little bit of your other video regarding Nietzche’s philosophy on perspectivism and i 100% nailed that down. also, hearing the intro to this video - “this book is a very difficult read- it gave me a confidence boost that i can carry on and try to interpret this book on my own, because it’s not just me who is having a mental exercise with this particular book. i’m excited to read more, and will be back here when i’m done, to compare and see what how well i was able to capture his message!
So won't you sacrifice yourself for such a proposition? Should a man laugh to your face on asserting such hollow statement, won't it stiffen you up in your conviction?
im reading beyond good and evil right now and im using this video as a guide to better absorve the ideas and understand more clearly. thank you, you are helping me and this video is amazing and full of details just the way i was searching !!!
Thank you for making this video! I picked up “beyond good and evil” a year ago and after various attempts of reading and re-reading, there were so many thoughts swirling in my head 😅 but this helped me so much with my comprehension
In Nietzsche's own supposition of philosophy, all he says must also be distrusted since by his own admission, his own quest for "truth" is also tainted by his own WILL TO POWER. I take this to mean that Nietzsche accepts that he is also wielding the hammer upon himself and that his own writings should also be put under the same scrutiny with which he seeks tear asunder all other logical argument save for his own. What is safest then? Perhaps not to take all reasoning from any one person with an axe to grind, but in whole with the understanding that all humanity is fundamentally flawed, including Nietzsche.
Great video. I have a question about will to power in terms of digestion and the food. How do you know which will is winning? How is the the food being broken down is a loss of a battle to its will. Moreover how is a long life a strengthing of the will?in general, i can agree we sre driven by will to power, but how do we know that the will is gaining power
We never know strength of Will of power untill the battles end. It's not as simple as rabbit Vs carrot = rabbit win. It's simplified so it easier to understand. We know rabbit must've been won because it's already happen in the past. The battle is over. In modern application it's like America vs Russia. America belief in freedom, Russia belief in control. Which one stronger? We will never know cause the battle isn't over yet.
Great work! I think Beyond Good and Evil is actually a finished work if the intention is not to give answers which take away our power to question but the focus is on giving questions to find our own meaning and power.
I read the book nearly twenty years ago and it seemed to me, at the very least, ambiguous in its philosophical claims: not the slippery word-salad of Derrida, but of little use to an analytical philosopher. But you've given me reason to take another look.
Interesting vid to watch as a practicing Catholic, I enjoy learning about these other ideas tho, help me to doubt my own and strengthen my beliefs through challenge.
Excellent take on Nietzsche's masterpiece. The only important information missing is that Beyond Good and Evil was an explanation or follow-up to Thus Spoke Zarathustra and that Nietzsche regarded his work complete at that time, what may be a clue to his unsuccessful effort in his ambition to revaluation of all of the values later.
Indeed, hearing more about each of the concepts you mentioned would be of great interest here. Amor fati is a favorite subject for me. I'm happy to back the obvious effort you've dedicated to this project.
Everyone speaks his own language of good and evil. He invents this language for himself in custom and tradition. A free man is a warrior Because a warrior is not a slave. He must require strength Because otherwise he will never attain power. What is good ? An increase in power- Power itself: Will Zur Macht
Thank you so much, your summary and explanation has helped me tremendously to read Beyond Good and Evil. Instead of clueless, I feel more prepared and can absorb what his saying with the gist of his points in mind, thanks to this video summary. Like you suggest, "read the book", video summary is not a substitute to actual reading, but it does provide an excellent warm up. I would lose my mind if you explain Myth of Sisyphus. I really love your explanation style, pace and tone!
Thank you so much for breaking this down. Beyond Good and Evil spun my head around pretty good. For potential future projects, please do a break down of how Carl Jung had continue Nietzsche's work as well 🙏
The main idea of Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is that traditional concepts of good and evil are limiting and that people should strive to move beyond them. Nietzsche argues that morality is not fixed and that our concepts of good and evil have had opposite meanings at different times. He believes that the underlying force driving all change is will, and all drives boil down to a will to power, a drive for freedom and domination over other things. Nietzsche's ideal "philosophy of the future" is one that is free enough to shift perspectives and overturn the "truths" and other dogmas of rigid thinking. Nietzsche's ideal philosophers would also turn their will to power inward, struggling constantly against themselves to overcome their own prejudices and assumptions. Nietzsche argues that if we could break free from traditional conceptions of good and evil, people could advance to achieve their greatest potential. The truly great man could define a new morality beyond good and evil.
What doesn’t make sense to me is two things 1. A will implies some kind of identity, and if one thing is competing against another for power, there must be two definable identities. Where does individual identity come from? It cannot be a network, it must be an individual because networks of orgasm for example are too diffuse and cannot clearly compete for power. 2. How can you ever distinguish exertion of power? What defines power? For example, what if the will of the carrot wants to exert its power by occupying maximum space. So, it wants to turn into gas, it must exert its will to manipulate the rabbit into eating it so that it can be dispersed as it wishes. Again, power exertion implies individuality and a will because power is always aimed at a will. This goes against his initial point of morality being a faulty binary system of good and bad. He is using a binary system of me and not me, this and that, power and weakness etc, Any help understanding would be appreciated.
Nietzsche and Jung were both Gnostics. In fact Jung wrote a lot about Gnosticism. One of the goals taught by Gnostic occultist Aleister Crowley was to be beyond good and evil, or to be amoral. Is one has no morals then nothing can hold him back from finding his true will or destiny, wether it be good or evil. It goes back to the garden of Eden with the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the book of Genesis. This is what these "philosophers" are teaching. Nietzsche didn't invent this.
A great performance! You are among the “happy few” who understands Nietzsche, that’s to say to experience him; this may simultaneously place you in the rank of unlucky souls, as Nietzsche has only deep pity for those who might have understood him. With his own inimitable empathy, Nietzsche holds whoever understanding him as his fellow sufferer. The Erdgeist greets here the Weltgeist!
It's not true that "Nietzsche had great pity for those who understood him"! Quite the opposite, as is abundantly apparent. You might consider trying to read him.
@@jamesbarlow6423 he certainly would agree that those of greater intelligence suffer more, so the comment isn't totally out of line in that context, Nietzsche's views on pity notwithstanding
The opposition to and popularity of Friedrich Nietzsche can both be explained in part because of his fundamental opposition to ideas and values of the ruling classes in the centuries before him and in his time. On his own, he challenged everything at once. That is genius.
Nietzsche undoubtedly had a huge influence on french post-modernists hegel had a considerable influence on neitzsche but I think Max Stirner had a greater influence and is the progenitor of nietzsche's philosophy though it remains to be known directly or indirectly thanks for the great videos and helping to making philosophy accessible to greater audiences
@James Henry Smith what are you talking about ? plus if the devil is a creation of God and inferior to him why would God engage in such a meaningless protracted duel God's knowledge is true and limitless so he knows he is stronger and does not need a test to prove himself but thanks for caring about others and trying to save them from a perceived danger. My Regards
Love Patience+ Simplicity are 3 greatest treasures of mankind; But man tends to chase after das ends And forget about das root. Returning to das source is returning to tranquility. There is no happiness higher than rest. Break das flower tipped arrows of Mara And death will never touch me again. Painful is birth. Painful is death. Painful is birth and death over and over again.
19:42. "Supposing that nothing else is a "given" as real but our world of desires and passions". Is it just me or does that seem Schoppenhauer-ian? It almost seems to be referencing Schoppenhauer's "The Will"? Is this correct? I'm not absolutely sure that I understand what Schoppenhauer even means by the "Will", but is this is a reference to his idea of the "Will", right?
No it’s anti-Schopenhauer. The thought experiment is about trying to think of the world of appearance (passions, impressions etc) as the only real world, while Schopenhauer would argue there is a metaphysical world that’s “more real”
@@WeltgeistYT Hmm, I might have misunderstood then. I thought the "will" was desire, sensation, urges/needs, etc, and that what Schopenhauer was telling the world to avoid, this being a similar aspect to the Buddhist goal. Anyways, as always, thanks for the fantastic content!
There's a lot that this video doesn't touch on from the book. For starters, you spend a lot of time dissecting Nietzsche's critique of Christianity, but that's not the real criticism Nietzsche has in Beyond Good and Evil. His real critique is of dogma, and especially dogma to Platonism, which he asserts Christianity is the foremost example of. So his real challenge is pointed at Plato, who has dominated the realm of philosophy for millennia. He sees that Plato went beyond the ideas of Socrates and crafted a philosophy and system of values in a way that matches what you call "perspectivism." Nietzsche thinks Plato shifted philosophy away from the pre-Socratics on purpose to create his own values, and as such, Nietzsche seeks a return to the pre-Socratic philosophy which will lead to the actual truth of things. Another important thing is that Nietzsche points out that culture, and values in particular, are temporal. He uses the analogy of a Greek play to showcase this: the audience sees the costumes that the actors wear and laugh at it, ridiculing the culture and values of past cultures. However, they fail to realize that they also wear "costumes" themselves. Only when this is realized can a new set of values be created, and the philosopher of the future can join Nietzsche in his nakedness, free of values and embodying truth. This new creation of values has become possible due to cosmopolitanism, which allows the study of cultures and values more freely. All people need to do is realize their own costumes. Speaking of values, Nietzsche points out that it was Judaism, not Christianity, that inverted values. Judaism is what established slave morality over master morality; Christianity took those values and spread them across the world. However, Nietzsche admires Judaism because is created its own values, something that he seeks to achieve himself (or at least get someone else to do). Thus, Nietzsche seeks to reinstate master morality, and values greatness and nobility over piety and chastity. The last thing I will mention is that Nietzsche ridiculed nationalism. He broke off his relationship with Wagner because of German nationalism. Nietzsche saw that history had trended towards a united world, and nationalism was undermining it. To elaborate, Nietzsche saw that living conditions were continuously growing throughout history, from villages, to cities, to countries. The next step in the progression in his mind is a united Europe. So he essentially foresaw the EU and UN and other leagues. It doesn't take genius to foresee that the next step is a united world.
"Thus, Nietzsche seeks to reinstate master morality..." I was under the impression that Nietzsche believed it was impossible to return to master morality, thus his 'transvaluation of all values'. Am I wrong? Not a criticism, I genuinely want to learn.
@@SJ-kc6et From my understanding, Nietzsche only provided two types of morality: master and slave. Perhaps the philosopher of the future could create a new form, maybe something of the middling sort somehow, but taken in the context of the rest of his works, that seems unlikely. He praises strength and greatness throughout Beyond Good and Evil and criticizes Judaism for making those things taboo. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra he poses the idea of the Ubermensche and the last man, who embody master and slave morality, respectively, and he pushes for the Ubermensche. With this in mind, I think the transvaluation of values means to flip them back towards the master side
Nice supplemental points enhancing the video content, however, the video never claimed to be the premier and thorough written analysis of this author or his work. Of course there will be gaps, like, y’know, criticizing Christianity rather than Paul is like saying, Heretical rather than Irenaeus of Gaul. Same thing.
I am very grateful of your videos. I watched this one as soon as I finished the book. I plan to do the same with your videos on On the Genealogy of Morals as soon as I finish it. Thanks!
I appreciate your videos, mate. I do have one comment concerning Nietzsche as the “philosopher with a hammer”: I believe he wrote that this does _not_ mean that he intends to deal strong, destructive blows; but rather, like a sculptor, he intends to chisel away a bit here, a bit there where necessary.
I wish I could witness Alan Watts discussing western philosophical prejudices with Nietzsche. I've spent a fair amount of time studying Watts and I know of only one place he mentioned Nietzsche. However I'm pretty sure he was influenced also by him. He speaks a lot about how our language structure deceived us into believing that nature is actually structured in the same way language is. From the Greeks throughout western philosophy. But Watts had I more access to eastern philosophy and he was able to point the incredible differences, derived from language, between east and west in the way the world is viewed
Got 3 pages into the book and thought there has to be an easier way to digest this headache of a read haha! Thank you for presenting and breaking this down in a way I could absorb it. I wonder if he maybe left us to fill in the blanks because our will to find truthful answers is arguably the essence of what he was getting at? Our egos are what drive us to conclusions that have us at the center of them. The world is much bigger than our self centred conclusions of what good or evil are and how these two definitions operate in our little existence. As you say its a deep book but its barely dipping the toe into each subject it touched on.
I often feel that Nietzsche isn't hard to read. The most important meaning is often very accessible. What makes him hard is the amount of subtext. He can express so many different ideas in a small paragraph, which makes it hard to not miss something
Gratitude, good human. The mere idea of Perspectivism is commendable. We have got perspectives rather than a single objective truth, this seems intriguing.
Support us on Patreon, get access to exclusive videos:
▶ www.patreon.com/WeltgeistYT
W H🌐 domestics what?
Man V. Dog
Dog V. Man
The feline house cat
Cannabis
Exploited Workers
How long has alpha and beta man domesticated man?
Not an easy question to answer precisely.
Why?
See
Tyrell Corporation
Omni Consumer Products
GATTICA
Brave New World
Logan's Run
Less Human Than Human™
*COMMERCE*
Brazil (It's A State of Mind)
...and The Mind of The State... regulated so the bottom can't get to the top or hold THEM accountable and governing minds of men in an everlasting battle - one man's PR is another man's education and one man's patriot is another man's lying terrorist extremist - and yet another's radical or root cause analyst.
A purposeful intentional chaotic disharmony antithetical to Life's shared DNA RNA prions and epigenetics AGAINST Nature and its immutable laws.
Now C R | $ P ® ™
It is existential and dozens of those are in play or too likely.
It comes to a brutally bitter end at exponential rates with vicious feedback and points with no return.
Indomitable Western man burdens Earth to death claiming he works for G nosis, Geometry, Genesis and 1 just G*d but all indicates he works for Genocide and and altogether opposing HIGH POWER, likely Earth bound and most twisted, as far as a court, a medical science body or group of theologists and philosophers.can logically conclude, unless THEY are merely embodying their own will to power amongst those they submit to and call Masters or Mister. ‡
A bunch of I V league phonies, poseurs, and wannabe insiders.
One and all!
Phonies!
No help.
No wisdom.
No luck.
By their collective results and losses YOU shall know these fruits and nuts.
Meanwhile any wildlife still free pays no taxes, interest against inflation and does what it wills, without care about entitlements, disease maintenance insurance scams, law enforcement, DoD, lies, vanity or shame.
When nothing else satisfies, only Nature remains.
Enter Zen,
THERE!
Within and without.
Communicate, community,
symbiosis,
harmony,
accord,
good,
Livn
For
Luvn
Where is evil?
Always where We
expect it
LEAST.
ALL WAYS!
_Feeling_ ~ Free‽™
Our Time IS almost up.
-o-
‡
Indomitable Ignorance
Indomitable Arrogance
Indomitable Unaccountably
Indomitable Indifference
Unproductive Uncreative Caste Hooking Exploited
Caste with M.E.D.S
For Global P P P Party Addicts
P ower
P erversions of care, conscience & Nature & Its Immutable Laws
P rotection Rackets
M oney
E entertainment
D rugs
S exploitation (Sado Masochistic)
Bi🌐©ide, Gen🌐©ide, Ec🌐©ide,Totalitarianism
Doubt Division are THEIR chief products and long term devolution.
T H E Y do anything for their addictions.
ANY THING, ALL THE TIME, EVERYWHERE, ALL, AT ONCE!
CONt'd
_NEXT_
CONt'd
We have less than 90 seconds on the D oo ms d a y Clock
in the Garden
Of Good & E v i l
Your choices matter, still, for now. Maybe.
Choose one!
💲 ☣️ ⚡ 🌐 💩🏴☠️ ⚡ ☢️ 💲
V$
🌎 😍 🌘
Cont'd
*NEXT*
Cont'd
Make Americas Nicer,
Natur 🌎 Ally
We The Good Human Kind
Spell THAT
M
A
N
Natur 🌍 Ally!
Would you love to know more?
J US T Ask.
Try it out and find out.
Don't just think about it! Watching a cell from a cell frying cells.
BE about IT.
Know!
Do.
Think. Thank!
Be a part of THE WHOLE Big Beautiful Blue 🌏
Natur🌏Ally!
Why?
Well.
*_WHY NOT_* ‽
If NOT YOU,
W H 0‽
If NOT N🌐W,
NEVERMORE!
Remember
There IS NO PLACE
LIKE
HOME!...
...
.
•
°
o
0
🌐
🕳️
‽
🕳️
😍
🌎
🌘
What's YOUR
State of Mind
ON‽ ©
Have a nice daze,
CON★FUsEd
So Mr Nietzche, What is will & what is power? hmmmm
@@NuanceOverDogma In the context of Neitzsche, the "will to power" is the vehicle to insanity. Nietzsche was destined for clinical insanity, but his perspective was always irrational because its foundation stone is irrational. (He did NOT find the Philosopher's Stone.) However, because he was so intelligent, his insanity was given the world stage - as if it is legitimate philosophy. Adolph Hitler bought his insanity, Ayn Rand and other "conservatives" bought his insanity, the Republican Party, Libertarians and other "conservative" organizations bought his insanity, Donald Trump RAN with that insanity, and now you will see that insanity result in the destruction of the United States, Israel, and democracy around the globe. But democracy will later rise as a Phoenix from the ashes - in China and Russia, where TRUE Christianity will be re-discovered, which is quite unlike the false Pauline Christianity of the West. For, FATE IS A FACT. ("Will to power," yea, right!) Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
Descartes: "I..."
Nietzsche : "Lemme stop you right there"
xD
Death is a great opportunity to be no I
@@satnamo later go
😂
Yes, with an advert for a funeral company, and then an insurance company…carry on…
Making this deeply complex topic as simplifies as you did is gonna change the world man, thank you, the world desperately seems to need more of this
Thank you for the great compliment
I have to say, this is one of the best and most easy to undertand videos ( no so fast and comprehensible) I have wached. Theres some vidoes out there that the narrative is going so fast that makes it hard to follow. Please keep it at the same pace and thank you so much.
Thank you!
Nature does not rush
Yet everything is accomplished.
Slow is smooth.
Smooth is fast.
Fast is powerful because f=ma
@James Henry Smith why do you people make every comment section Sunday school of church ? Chill we don't want to be saved by your Jesus 👍
@@satnamo are you a Daoist?
Ngl i had to go 1.25x speed lol
What's really odd to me, is that a lot of people like to say that Nietzsche was arrogant, but I think he was actually one of the most humble philosophers in a way, perhaps the most humble. Instead of claiming to "find the truth" like every other philosopher, he tackles the very notion of that being possible. He thinks we need a new value system clearly, but he never ventures to fully prescribe it himself. Something that other philosophers tried to do, which seems a bit more arrogant to me than anything Nietzsche said.
If you point out that you can say more in one sentence than other writers can in an entire book people will say you're arrogant. When they read your words and realise that it's true, people must acknowledge your genius. This was essentially what happened to Nietsche. It's like Ussain Bolt, LeBron or Messi saying they're the greatest athletes on earth. It sounds arrogant until you watch them compete.
I mean, he definitely was arrogant. Lol. Sure he was sensitive and intelligent, but certainly arrogant.
Not odd at all, most ppl are threatened by truth, no one is more hated that the one who speaks the truth - plato. Tho i can understand perspective you mean it from, i have too deep symphaties, sometimes ppls' behavior stop making sense in any framework you know, it is indeed will-to-power and nothing besides. Who would come to known full truth of reality would perish. I saw full extent of human suffering and reality for what it is! And by some miracle i am still here, tho i don't believe on death... There is no escape except to man up and fix it... we need indeed art and make like game sport fun for everyone, otherwise pure dyonesian force is too excessive and not good art and too wild, unrestrained, most ppl would go crazy from it... And to raw/sadistic! YOu should elevate other ppl with you instead of pushing them down! Which is what corporations do today, which creates inimaginable suffering. Torture victims in prisoners say it is not worst the torture (in philippines to add), but uncertainty and stress they don't know how is their family and can't care about them!
"He thinks we need a new value system clearly, but he never ventures to fully prescribe it himself. Something that other philosophers tried to do, which seems a bit more arrogant to me than anything Nietzsche said."
I don't agree. He's thinking about what a new value system would even look like in the first place. In fact, I think he questions whether or not a new value system is even possible.
If you read Neitzche and come away with an answer, then you've completely missed the point. He's not saying there's not an answer, he's not saying that he's got the answer.
Honestly, I think Neitzche is mostly just having fun. I think he's just doing what he does, and I'm just doing what I do by reading him.
@richardhorvatichfitdev6407 Friedrich Jacobi has a similar idea. “Even the greatest mind, if it wants to explain all things absolutely, to make them rhyme with each other… [will] run into absurdities”.
See also:
NIETZSCHE: Will to Power Explained (all parts) ruclips.net/video/He6ZC7ZFBt8/видео.html
If you found this video helpful, please like & subscribe. It helps out the channel a great deal. Thank you for watching! There's more Nietzsche coming.
Hello, You didn't indicate about Nietzesche's "quid quid luce fuit, tenebris agit
please do genealogy of morals
Holy shit that perspectivism part blew my mind a little bit... no objective truth just a billion individual perspectives, and the accepted truth of the masses isn't necessarily because its objective, its because the person proclaiming his worldview had the most "Will To Power"
Is perspectivivism objectively true?
Yes,
das whole world is nothing
but Will Zur Macht.
Each and every one of those billion invidual perspectives still have an objective component, because all perspectives agree on certain things. Everybody thinks that what they want, is good. This is objectively true, since there cannot be a perspective in which it is not true. If someone says that they want something bad, they simultaneously admitt that it is good from their perspective by wanting it. It is also objectively true that you cannot miss out on something you don't want, because claiming you missed out is the same as admitting you wanted the thing.
Sorry for rambling im just using you to collect my thoughts.
@@cerwile1 that is actually how Plato saw it.. There is no evil, because everything is desired only because it is considered a good. The problem (according to Plato), is ignorance, not evil. Simply Ignorance of the nature of Being., which is beyond the opposites and complete unto itself. In other words, beyond all concepts.
@@michaelmcclure3383 And that brings us to virtue ethics. Whether something is good or bad isnt really arguable, because those value judgements are based on will and not reason. Virtues, on the other hand are arguable. I have the right to destroy my own property, so blowing up my house isnt really a matter of right and wrong, but if we use the language of virtues instead, it isnt really arguable that my act was "reckless" and "wasteful". And whether an act is "wasteful" or "reckless" are a matter of ignorance and wisdom as you said. The are arguable. Good vs bad is not.
This channel is destined for great things
Thank you very much!
Destiny takes us down new roads and to strange places.
I would love to see a Will to Power video separate from Beyond Good and Evil. I have seven of Nietzsche’s books and these videos help me understand him more thoroughly.
We made one, check the channel! Thx for your interest
Understand Nietzsche thoroughly and you will either decide that you have wasted your time, or he will reinforce your lowest base instincts such that you become as mad as he. Nietzsche was destined for insanity. His perspective was always irrational. But because he was so intelligent, his insanity was given the world stage, as if it is legitimate philosophy. Adolph Hitler bought his insanity, Ayn Rand and other "conservatives" bought his insanity, the Republican Party, Libertarians and other "conservative" organizations bought his insanity, Donald Trump RAN with that insanity, and now you will see that insanity result in the destruction of the United States, Israel, and democracy around the globe. But democracy will later rise as a Phoenix from the ashes- in China and Russia, where TRUE Christianity will be re-discovered, which is quite unlike the false Pauline Christianity of the West. Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
your voice and speaking style just fits to these complicated philosophical subjects.
RUclips is full of videos on these subjects where sound, and speaking style becomes a barrier.
Your videos are also having the right substance, and time balance.
Thank you, and congratulations!
Thank you very much for the great comment
Pleasant speech is das higheste blessing.
you're one of the first people i can actually understand philosophy from .. please keep doing these
I say yes to The Will to Power. So important is this, that it deserves a full video. Thank you Sir.
hopefully you have more coming out on Friedrich Nietzsche and Carl jung. I definitely enjoy the videos.
Thank you. There's definitely more on Nietzsche planned.
Yes please!
@@WeltgeistYT eagerly waiting for more
Yes please
@James Henry Smith I think you are missing Nietzsche's point
thank you for attaching them together in one video!
we can remain more focoused all through the 3👌🙏
You're welcome.
What is happiness ?
Absorption
What is das source of unhappiness ?
Ignoring das source of happiness.
What is das source of happiness ?
Das source of happiness is from within.
I would watch every single video about philosophy you post. So far on your channel we see high quality understanding and expo of philosophical works and philosophers.
Thank you for the great compliment
Just stopped a video just to say how superb, step by step explanation you give us instead of fast going through bunch of texts other channels do. Means a lot to us who arent versed in philosophy scripture
Glad it helped!
Thank you so much. I've been having trouble trying to understand that book, and it sometimes keeps me awake at night. Now I have a greater insight on it
You’re welcome
That analogy of the university only being a collection of buildings as the 'self' being only a collection of thoughts or the 'will' being only a collection of drives is brilliant! Decartes too had, as Nietsche put it in the prelude of BG&E, a "faith in grammar". This is revelational stuff!
Your voice etc = great narrator, don't stop. We'd love to hear you speak on any subject any time. Well done!
that analogy blew my mind wide-open!!!
what do you mean by faith in grammar? sorry for the random question
@@honkahonkanoise Much obliged!
"cogito ergo sum"
"I think, therefore I am"
Decartes believed this to be the rational bedrock on which he could build his entire philosophy.
But let's examine this phrase; namely the first part:
"I think"
What is this "I" *really* ?
Well, it's the subject of the sentence, right? It's the cause of the predicate, i.e. the cause of the action of "thinking" itself.
But just as a 'university' is only a collection of buildings, and the 'self' is only a collection of thoughts, could this 'I' not also be a reduction of far more complex processes
Why do we assume "I" exists? And even assume that it is in fact the cause of "thinking"? How do we *really* know that? Couldn't it be just as easily said that thoughts are merely "coming to us"? Who's to say that they aren't being somehow "implanted" into our awarness by something outside of it? For example, perhaps when I'm thinking about food, it's not because I thought it willingly, but that my hunger drive brought the thought of food to my attention, and I only thought I thought the thought of food completely after the fact?
The assumption of "I" being the cause of "thought" may in fact be merely a stone-aged metaphisic preserved in our language.
In this light, "I" can be understood in a very similar fashion to how we understand other metaphysical concepts like the "soul", that is to say, merely a supersition.
An unreasonable, unwarented reduction of the phenomena of experiencing "thinking".
A more resonable, honest statement would be:
"There are thoughts" OR "experiences of thinking are occuring"
But then there wouldn't be a justification for the existence of an "I" anymore, now would there?
It could be said then, that Decartes had a faith in "I", a faith in grammar itself, just like Christians had a faith in a "soul".
@@a.wenger3964 thank you so much!
I just read the first chapter of Beyond Good and Evil and figured I'd watch some vids explaining wtf I just read ... I'm happy I wasn't too far off.. thank you for the explanation, I look forward to viewing your previous and future vids - Cheers from Alabama (usa)
Thank you!
Cheer me from California state of North America.
This is a great summary of this book. Please keep up this work on such a profound and important writer and philosopher
Thank you for the kind words
This was surprisingly well educational on Nietzsches Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Very professional Video, more views deserved!
Thank you!
“The morality of free society can have no application to slave society. . . .Make a man a slave, and you rob him of of moral responsibility. Freedom of choice is the essence of all accountability.”
― Frederick Douglass, My Bondage and My Freedom
@James Henry Smith bro stop spamming
We get it
These videos are incredible! Please continue your work, much appriciated :)
Thanks!
Thank you for tackling these philosophical thoughts of Nietzsche. Much appreciated... so more please!
Our series on the Genealogy of Morals is coming out. Thanks for watching
What a wonderful video. I feel a certain pull to be a part of the process of formulating the philosophy of the future in my own way, no matter how small or big.
please do a full video on the will to power!! ❤️❤️
Mr. Weltgeist here is a video suggestion, perhaps make a video on Gilbert Ryle "Concept of mind" ?
The "will to power" for Nietzsche was the driving force behind all universal events, whether at a cellular or macroscopic level, from the simplest to the most complex phenomena. He describes this will as a creative and dominating force, essential for overcoming obstacles. Although Nietzsche didn't intend to attribute a purely mechanistic character to this concept, it's difficult to imagine how creativity would be associated with simple forms, such as unicellular beings. Therefore, I decided to approach this concept from a more universal perspective, in order to be consistent with its comprehensive explanation of everything in the universe.
In summary, according to the concept developed by Nietzsche, the "will to power" would be the pursuit of dominating or shaping the world in our image and likeness. For instance, in Ancient Rome, the relentless quest for territorial conquest reflected this will, the idea of making the world more aligned with the Romans' vision. A writer, by publishing a book, seeks to influence those who read it to become more similar to himself; a singer, upon hearing their music being sung, experiences a sort of gain in the will to power by noticing that those who sing their music become more like them; a parent reproducing abusive behaviors for their child also pursues this will, molding them in their image and likeness; a prisoner, when confined in isolation, cannot exercise this will, as the world around them is not becoming more similar to their own image and likeness.
Similarly, seemingly simple actions in nature, such as photosynthesis performed by a plant or the production of fruits by a tree, represent a way of exercising this will, shaping the surrounding world to resemble more their own nature. Likewise, the process of reproduction in living beings, cells multiplying, or even the sun burning an individual's skin are examples that reflect this pursuit of the manifestation of the "will to power," where the world around is shaped in resemblance to the influencing being.
In a way, we can perceive creativity and destruction as the convergence of two "wills to power": the sun, by manifesting its will to power over the skin, creates something new; the burnt skin is now more aligned with the image and likeness of the sun. Parents exert their will to power in reproduction, generating something new, their child, reflecting the image and likeness of the parents. When Rome invaded other regions, it exercised its will to power, while the resisting army of the invaded region also exerted its will to power. Rome sought to shape the invaded region in its image and likeness, while the resisting army attempted to preserve the region according to its own image and likeness.
Thus, creation, destruction, and overcoming are in tune with what is described as the will to power.
Lots of assumptions here , a writer or singer doesnt do what they love so that they can enforce their will , rather it is an be for several other things
Nature do not recognize good or evil. Only the balance and imbalance.
Nature looks upon mankind as stray dogs.
Yeah. And vibrations
Who gives a shit about what nature recognize?
@@rodolfo9916 I do!
@@MarcusViegler bad for you
i’ve always wanted to embark on a philosophical journey and really dive deeper into the subject, but i never knew how to begin. so after watching a Jordan Peterson lesson, i noticed his admiration for Nietzche - so the very first book i got to start learning more about philosophy was Beyond Good and Evil. After 10 days of reading, rereading, breaking it down, writing down thoughts and how it applied to the world, i FINALLY got past Part 1. i watched a little bit of your other video regarding Nietzche’s philosophy on perspectivism and i 100% nailed that down. also, hearing the intro to this video - “this book is a very difficult read- it gave me a confidence boost that i can carry on and try to interpret this book on my own, because it’s not just me who is having a mental exercise with this particular book. i’m excited to read more, and will be back here when i’m done, to compare and see what how well i was able to capture his message!
How is it going so far ?
updates?
Great breakdown. Well paced with the right amount of detail
We seek the truth for the sake of self-control, not power over others.
Perhaps a “power over oneself”, so to speak? 🧐
So won't you sacrifice yourself for such a proposition? Should a man laugh to your face on asserting such hollow statement, won't it stiffen you up in your conviction?
Very correct
Many thanks for all your Nietzche's videos. Best regards from Cancún, México!
Only Nietzche can understand Nietzche
so much .. that he went insane when he realized he can finally understand his own thoughts. He was a genius!!
Thanks for splicing all the videos together
im reading beyond good and evil right now and im using this video as a guide to better absorve the ideas and understand more clearly. thank you, you are helping me and this video is amazing and full of details just the way i was searching !!!
I listened nonstop and thoroughly enjoyed it
Thank you for making this video! I picked up “beyond good and evil” a year ago and after various attempts of reading and re-reading, there were so many thoughts swirling in my head 😅 but this helped me so much with my comprehension
You’re welcome!
Great video, I think your retention would increase significantly if you added some low-volume classical music behind your voice
I enjoyed the video thoroughly. Excellent job done!
Thank you!
Me tooo
Thank you for this content. I've really appreciated that. Very good quality!
In Nietzsche's own supposition of philosophy, all he says must also be distrusted since by his own admission, his own quest for "truth" is also tainted by his own WILL TO POWER. I take this to mean that Nietzsche accepts that he is also wielding the hammer upon himself and that his own writings should also be put under the same scrutiny with which he seeks tear asunder all other logical argument save for his own. What is safest then? Perhaps not to take all reasoning from any one person with an axe to grind, but in whole with the understanding that all humanity is fundamentally flawed, including Nietzsche.
Great video, which explains the main concepts of the book. You helped me a lot to organize my knowledge. Keep up the good work!
Great video. I have a question about will to power in terms of digestion and the food. How do you know which will is winning? How is the the food being broken down is a loss of a battle to its will. Moreover how is a long life a strengthing of the will?in general, i can agree we sre driven by will to power, but how do we know that the will is gaining power
We never know strength of Will of power untill the battles end.
It's not as simple as rabbit Vs carrot = rabbit win. It's simplified so it easier to understand. We know rabbit must've been won because it's already happen in the past. The battle is over.
In modern application it's like America vs Russia. America belief in freedom, Russia belief in control. Which one stronger? We will never know cause the battle isn't over yet.
12:17
13:42
16:36
22:51
25:11 25:12
Wow nice video very entertaining! Can you do the the twilight of idols and the four volumes of this spoke Zarathustra? They are all by Nietzsche!
Great work! I think Beyond Good and Evil is actually a finished work if the intention is not to give answers which take away our power to question but the focus is on giving questions to find our own meaning and power.
I read the book nearly twenty years ago and it seemed to me, at the very least, ambiguous in its philosophical claims: not the slippery word-salad of Derrida, but of little use to an analytical philosopher. But you've given me reason to take another look.
If I know why something is true
Then I know it is das truth.
Das truth will set me free.
This is an exceptionally enlightening video.
Very nice video. Thanks you . This was well explained. Please continue with your videos.
Interesting vid to watch as a practicing Catholic, I enjoy learning about these other ideas tho, help me to doubt my own and strengthen my beliefs through challenge.
Just because I'm Catholic doesn't mean I can't study Existentialism.
Excellent take on Nietzsche's masterpiece. The only important information missing is that Beyond Good and Evil was an explanation or follow-up to Thus Spoke Zarathustra and that Nietzsche regarded his work complete at that time, what may be a clue to his unsuccessful effort in his ambition to revaluation of all of the values later.
Indeed, hearing more about each of the concepts you mentioned would be of great interest here. Amor fati is a favorite subject for me. I'm happy to back the obvious effort you've dedicated to this project.
Thank you for the support
Everyone speaks his own language of good and evil.
He invents this language for himself in custom and tradition.
A free man is a warrior
Because a warrior is not a slave.
He must require strength
Because otherwise he will never attain power.
What is good ?
An increase in power-
Power itself:
Will Zur Macht
2:01 what painting is that?
Thank you so much, your summary and explanation has helped me tremendously to read Beyond Good and Evil. Instead of clueless, I feel more prepared and can absorb what his saying with the gist of his points in mind, thanks to this video summary. Like you suggest, "read the book", video summary is not a substitute to actual reading, but it does provide an excellent warm up. I would lose my mind if you explain Myth of Sisyphus. I really love your explanation style, pace and tone!
We seek the truth for survival and to minimize pain, and maximize pleasure for ourselves and others.
If we learn to enjoy our self better
Then we forget how best to hurt others
And plot revenge for them.
Thank you for benefiting humanity. You earned a subscriber.
Thank you so much for breaking this down. Beyond Good and Evil spun my head around pretty good. For potential future projects, please do a break down of how Carl Jung had continue Nietzsche's work as well 🙏
The main idea of Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is that traditional concepts of good and evil are limiting and that people should strive to move beyond them. Nietzsche argues that morality is not fixed and that our concepts of good and evil have had opposite meanings at different times. He believes that the underlying force driving all change is will, and all drives boil down to a will to power, a drive for freedom and domination over other things. Nietzsche's ideal "philosophy of the future" is one that is free enough to shift perspectives and overturn the "truths" and other dogmas of rigid thinking. Nietzsche's ideal philosophers would also turn their will to power inward, struggling constantly against themselves to overcome their own prejudices and assumptions. Nietzsche argues that if we could break free from traditional conceptions of good and evil, people could advance to achieve their greatest potential. The truly great man could define a new morality beyond good and evil.
Thank you for all your videos on Nietzsche!
Glad you like them!
What doesn’t make sense to me is two things
1. A will implies some kind of identity, and if one thing is competing against another for power, there must be two definable identities. Where does individual identity come from? It cannot be a network, it must be an individual because networks of orgasm for example are too diffuse and cannot clearly compete for power.
2. How can you ever distinguish exertion of power? What defines power? For example, what if the will of the carrot wants to exert its power by occupying maximum space. So, it wants to turn into gas, it must exert its will to manipulate the rabbit into eating it so that it can be dispersed as it wishes. Again, power exertion implies individuality and a will because power is always aimed at a will. This goes against his initial point of morality being a faulty binary system of good and bad. He is using a binary system of me and not me, this and that, power and weakness etc,
Any help understanding would be appreciated.
Nietzsche and Jung were both Gnostics. In fact Jung wrote a lot about Gnosticism. One of the goals taught by Gnostic occultist Aleister Crowley was to be beyond good and evil, or to be amoral. Is one has no morals then nothing can hold him back from finding his true will or destiny, wether it be good or evil. It goes back to the garden of Eden with the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the book of Genesis. This is what these "philosophers" are teaching. Nietzsche didn't invent this.
From tomorrow on!!🎉🎉
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
A great performance! You are among the “happy few” who understands Nietzsche, that’s to say to experience him; this may simultaneously place you in the rank of unlucky souls, as Nietzsche has only deep pity for those who might have understood him. With his own inimitable empathy, Nietzsche holds whoever understanding him as his fellow sufferer. The Erdgeist greets here the Weltgeist!
Thanks for the great comment
WELTGEIST". 👌👍🌹
It's not true that "Nietzsche had great pity for those who understood him"! Quite the opposite, as is abundantly apparent. You might consider trying to read him.
@@jamesbarlow6423 he certainly would agree that those of greater intelligence suffer more, so the comment isn't totally out of line in that context, Nietzsche's views on pity notwithstanding
@@tightbhole420 . Reaching, but ok
Thank you for your work we need people like you in the philosophy community, keep it up 💪
Thank so much for this amazing work I know it take a lot of effort to make them
He who loves what he does
Wears himself out
Doing it.
What ever is done out of love always takes place beyond good and evil.
The opposition to and popularity of Friedrich Nietzsche can both be explained in part because of his fundamental opposition to ideas and values of the ruling classes in the centuries before him and in his time. On his own, he challenged everything at once. That is genius.
Nietzsche undoubtedly had a huge influence on french post-modernists
hegel had a considerable influence on neitzsche but I think Max Stirner had a greater influence and is the progenitor of nietzsche's philosophy though it remains to be known directly or indirectly
thanks for the great videos and helping to making philosophy accessible to greater audiences
@James Henry Smith what are you talking about ?
plus if the devil is a creation of God and inferior to him why would God engage in such a meaningless protracted duel
God's knowledge is true and limitless so he knows he is stronger and does not need a test to prove himself but thanks for caring about others and trying to save them from a perceived danger. My Regards
This was enjoyable and digestible. Thank you so much.
Please talk more about the will to power, this perspective sounds really interesting
We’ve done a full video on it
Thank you for this presentation.
I loved the video. Would love to see the Will to Power concept in Nietzsche's other works.
Wow. I was barely able to comprehend this video! Good work sir, subbed
I also think you can you should do a video on
Nietzsche in His Time: The Struggle Against Socratism and Socialism
With this video
I open my campaign against filosofi+ capitalism.
Extremely helpful and interesting video.
Thank you!!
You're welcome. Glad it helps
Great show and interesting needs to be considered!
Awesome video how does this video not have over 100,000 views?!
Thank you!
Really awesome. This is outstanding content, a real gem.
Thank you Ruben!
Love
Patience+
Simplicity are 3 greatest treasures of mankind;
But man tends to chase after das ends
And forget about das root.
Returning to das source is returning to tranquility.
There is no happiness higher than rest.
Break das flower tipped arrows of Mara
And death will never touch me again.
Painful is birth.
Painful is death.
Painful is birth and death over and over again.
19:42. "Supposing that nothing else is a "given" as real but our world of desires and passions". Is it just me or does that seem Schoppenhauer-ian? It almost seems to be referencing Schoppenhauer's "The Will"? Is this correct? I'm not absolutely sure that I understand what Schoppenhauer even means by the "Will", but is this is a reference to his idea of the "Will", right?
No it’s anti-Schopenhauer. The thought experiment is about trying to think of the world of appearance (passions, impressions etc) as the only real world, while Schopenhauer would argue there is a metaphysical world that’s “more real”
@@WeltgeistYT Hmm, I might have misunderstood then. I thought the "will" was desire, sensation, urges/needs, etc, and that what Schopenhauer was telling the world to avoid, this being a similar aspect to the Buddhist goal. Anyways, as always, thanks for the fantastic content!
I would enjoy a video on The Geneology of Morals.
Coming up
There's a lot that this video doesn't touch on from the book. For starters, you spend a lot of time dissecting Nietzsche's critique of Christianity, but that's not the real criticism Nietzsche has in Beyond Good and Evil. His real critique is of dogma, and especially dogma to Platonism, which he asserts Christianity is the foremost example of. So his real challenge is pointed at Plato, who has dominated the realm of philosophy for millennia. He sees that Plato went beyond the ideas of Socrates and crafted a philosophy and system of values in a way that matches what you call "perspectivism." Nietzsche thinks Plato shifted philosophy away from the pre-Socratics on purpose to create his own values, and as such, Nietzsche seeks a return to the pre-Socratic philosophy which will lead to the actual truth of things.
Another important thing is that Nietzsche points out that culture, and values in particular, are temporal. He uses the analogy of a Greek play to showcase this: the audience sees the costumes that the actors wear and laugh at it, ridiculing the culture and values of past cultures. However, they fail to realize that they also wear "costumes" themselves. Only when this is realized can a new set of values be created, and the philosopher of the future can join Nietzsche in his nakedness, free of values and embodying truth. This new creation of values has become possible due to cosmopolitanism, which allows the study of cultures and values more freely. All people need to do is realize their own costumes.
Speaking of values, Nietzsche points out that it was Judaism, not Christianity, that inverted values. Judaism is what established slave morality over master morality; Christianity took those values and spread them across the world. However, Nietzsche admires Judaism because is created its own values, something that he seeks to achieve himself (or at least get someone else to do). Thus, Nietzsche seeks to reinstate master morality, and values greatness and nobility over piety and chastity.
The last thing I will mention is that Nietzsche ridiculed nationalism. He broke off his relationship with Wagner because of German nationalism. Nietzsche saw that history had trended towards a united world, and nationalism was undermining it. To elaborate, Nietzsche saw that living conditions were continuously growing throughout history, from villages, to cities, to countries. The next step in the progression in his mind is a united Europe. So he essentially foresaw the EU and UN and other leagues. It doesn't take genius to foresee that the next step is a united world.
"Thus, Nietzsche seeks to reinstate master morality..."
I was under the impression that Nietzsche believed it was impossible to return to master morality, thus his 'transvaluation of all values'.
Am I wrong?
Not a criticism, I genuinely want to learn.
@@SJ-kc6et From my understanding, Nietzsche only provided two types of morality: master and slave. Perhaps the philosopher of the future could create a new form, maybe something of the middling sort somehow, but taken in the context of the rest of his works, that seems unlikely. He praises strength and greatness throughout Beyond Good and Evil and criticizes Judaism for making those things taboo. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra he poses the idea of the Ubermensche and the last man, who embody master and slave morality, respectively, and he pushes for the Ubermensche. With this in mind, I think the transvaluation of values means to flip them back towards the master side
@@andrewbowen2837 I appreciate the response.
Nice supplemental points enhancing the video content, however, the video never claimed to be the premier and thorough written analysis of this author or his work. Of course there will be gaps, like, y’know, criticizing Christianity rather than Paul is like saying, Heretical rather than Irenaeus of Gaul. Same thing.
UNITED WORLD...ONE WORLD...😂😂😂🌹 WHAT A VIBRANT SWEEP OF MIND.
LET'S INVOKE THE DIVINE BLESSINGS OF THE DIVINE FREE WILL 👏🔯🕉️☪️✝️🛐👏🌹
I am very grateful of your videos. I watched this one as soon as I finished the book. I plan to do the same with your videos on On the Genealogy of Morals as soon as I finish it. Thanks!
Thank you, that’s great to hear
Your way of explaining things is awesome 🤗🤗
Thanks!
I appreciate your videos, mate. I do have one comment concerning Nietzsche as the “philosopher with a hammer”: I believe he wrote that this does _not_ mean that he intends to deal strong, destructive blows; but rather, like a sculptor, he intends to chisel away a bit here, a bit there where necessary.
I wish I could witness Alan Watts discussing western philosophical prejudices with Nietzsche. I've spent a fair amount of time studying Watts and I know of only one place he mentioned Nietzsche. However I'm pretty sure he was influenced also by him.
He speaks a lot about how our language structure deceived us into believing that nature is actually structured in the same way language is. From the Greeks throughout western philosophy. But Watts had I more access to eastern philosophy and he was able to point the incredible differences, derived from language, between east and west in the way the world is viewed
Got 3 pages into the book and thought there has to be an easier way to digest this headache of a read haha! Thank you for presenting and breaking this down in a way I could absorb it.
I wonder if he maybe left us to fill in the blanks because our will to find truthful answers is arguably the essence of what he was getting at? Our egos are what drive us to conclusions that have us at the center of them. The world is much bigger than our self centred conclusions of what good or evil are and how these two definitions operate in our little existence. As you say its a deep book but its barely dipping the toe into each subject it touched on.
Mission accomplished. Bravo for the video series, and yes continue please to make content. Thank you!
More than any other philosopher Nietzsche has made me think about what it means to be a human being, and what are its drives.
Thanks for the exposition
Thank you so much for sharing this! I really enjoyed learning the concepts and would love to know more (anything) about NIETZSCHE's work!
Im reading Beyond Good and Evil now and I get through like 3 pages every time there is so much there to digest.
I often feel that Nietzsche isn't hard to read. The most important meaning is often very accessible. What makes him hard is the amount of subtext. He can express so many different ideas in a small paragraph, which makes it hard to not miss something
I did not find this video, the recommendation was gifted to me by algorithmic synchronicity and for that I am eternally grateful.
Congrats for the video is incredibly well done and sparks interest to learn more about Nietzsche
Thank you!
A video on the Geneology of Morals would be very much appreaicted
It's out. Part 2 coming up
@@WeltgeistYT yes, watched it today and thank you. looking forward to the next!
@@jeffjalili5660 Glad to hear it man!
amazing homage to the works of Nietzsche. really well presented
Thank you
I‘ve already watched half of a video. Good job! Very well-done! The Explanation is clear! Thank you
Thank you!
Clarity-
That is what weltgeist is aiming for.
What I really lack is
To be clear in my mind
What am I to do today, lh?
Gratitude, good human.
The mere idea of Perspectivism is commendable. We have got perspectives rather than a single objective truth, this seems intriguing.
Christian: *Does some humble work*
Neitzsche: "Still seeking power?"
I have only recently started reading the works of Fredrick Nietzsche and it was quite hard to tango, this video helped me massively!
Thankyou
Tango? More like breakdancing lol.The Nietzsche reader has to drown himself to understand this shit,that's why he is so misunderstood!